Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Therefore G3767 in G1722 the resurrection G386 whose G5101 wife G1135 of them G846 is she G1096? for G1063 seven G2033 had G2192 her G846 to wife G1135.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
In the Resurrection, which one’s wife will she be? For all seven were married to her.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So then, in the resurrection, whose wife will she be? For all seven were married to her.”
Ask
American Standard Version
In the resurrection therefore whose wife of them shall she be? for the seven had her to wife.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them will she be? For the seven had her as a wife.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Therefore at the resurrection, whose wife of them shall she be? for seuen had her to wife.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
in the rising again, then, of which of them doth she become wife? --for the seven had her as wife.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,813 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 20:33 presents the Sadducees' hypothetical question to Jesus, designed to undermine the concept of the resurrection. They propose a scenario involving a woman who, according to the Mosaic law of levirate marriage, marries seven brothers sequentially, all of whom die childless. Their query, "Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife," highlights their fundamental misunderstanding of the transformed nature of resurrected life, projecting earthly social structures and limitations onto the eternal realm.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a series of confrontations between Jesus and various Jewish religious leaders in Jerusalem, immediately preceding His passion. Following challenges from the chief priests, scribes, and elders regarding His authority (Luke 20:1-8), and a parable exposing their rejection of God's Son (Luke 20:9-19), the Sadducees, known for their denial of the resurrection, engage Jesus. Their question in Luke 20:33 is part of a deliberate attempt to trap Jesus with a seemingly unanswerable theological dilemma, thereby discrediting His teaching and authority before the crowds. Jesus's subsequent response in Luke 20:34-38 masterfully refutes their premise and reveals a deeper truth about the afterlife.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Sadducees were a prominent Jewish sect during the Second Temple period, primarily composed of aristocratic priests and wealthy landowners. Unlike the Pharisees, they rejected the oral law and adhered strictly to the written Torah (the Pentateuch), denying the resurrection of the dead, the existence of angels, and the concept of a future life or divine retribution beyond this world. Their question in Luke 20:33 is rooted in the Mosaic law of levirate marriage, found in Deuteronomy 25:5-6. This law mandated that if a man died childless, his brother should marry the widow to "raise up seed unto his brother," ensuring the deceased's name and inheritance continued. The Sadducees' hypothetical scenario, while extreme, was designed to expose what they perceived as the logical absurdity of resurrection belief when applied to earthly social structures like marriage and family lineage.
  • Key Themes: Luke 20:33 serves as a critical entry point for several overarching themes in Luke's Gospel and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights the nature of the resurrection, challenging the Sadducees' materialistic and anthropocentric view of the afterlife. Their question reveals a fundamental misconception that the resurrected state is merely an extension of earthly existence, rather than a transformed reality. Secondly, the passage underscores the clash between human wisdom and divine revelation. The Sadducees, relying on their limited human logic and a literalistic interpretation of earthly laws, attempt to trap Jesus, but His response transcends their framework, revealing the profound wisdom of God's plan for eternity. Finally, this encounter contributes to the theme of Jesus's authoritative teaching as He corrects theological error and unveils deeper spiritual truths, demonstrating His unique insight into the divine realm, a theme consistent with His teachings throughout Luke's Gospel.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Resurrection (Greek, anástasis', G386): From anístēmi (to stand up again); meaning "a standing up again" or "a rising again." This term specifically refers to a resurrection from death, whether individual or, by implication, its author. The Sadducees' question hinges on a very physical, earthly interpretation of this "standing up again," assuming a direct continuation of physical and social structures.
  • Wife (Greek, gynḗ', G1135): Probably from the base of gínomai (to become); meaning "a woman" or, specifically, "a wife." The Sadducees' entire argument revolves around the continuity of this earthly relationship—the status of a woman as a wife—into the resurrected state, which Jesus directly addresses and corrects.
  • For (Greek, gár', G1063): A primary particle assigning a reason. In this context, it introduces the justification or explanation for the Sadducees' question, "for seven had her to wife." It indicates that the subsequent clause provides the premise or the "problem" they believe their hypothetical scenario poses for the concept of resurrection.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Therefore in the resurrection": This opening phrase immediately sets the context for the Sadducees' challenge. "Therefore" (G3767, oûn) acts as a connective, linking their question to the preceding hypothetical scenario of the woman and seven brothers. The phrase "in the resurrection" (G1722, en + G386, anástasis) establishes the specific domain of their inquiry, indicating their focus on the nature of life after death and the implications for human relationships within that state.
  • "whose wife of them is she?": This is the core of the Sadducees' rhetorical question. "Whose wife" (G5101, tís + G1135, gynḗ) highlights their concern about the ownership or relational status of the woman in the afterlife, assuming that earthly marital bonds would persist and create an insoluble dilemma. The verb "is she" (G1096, gínomai) here functions as a copula, linking the woman to her potential marital status among the seven brothers.
  • "for seven had her to wife.": This clause provides the justification or premise for their question. "For" (G1063, gár) introduces the reason, explaining the complex marital history of the woman. "Seven" (G2033, heptá) emphasizes the extreme nature of the hypothetical situation, designed to make the problem seem insurmountable. "Had her to wife" (G2192, échō + G846, autós + G1135, gynḗ) describes the successive marital relationships, underscoring the Sadducees' assumption that such earthly arrangements would continue into eternity, leading to an absurd polygamous situation.

Literary Devices

Luke 20:33 employs several literary devices. The Sadducees' question itself is a prime example of Rhetorical Question, designed not to elicit information but to make a point and expose what they perceive as a logical flaw in the resurrection doctrine. There is also significant Irony at play: the Sadducees, in their attempt to trap Jesus and demonstrate the absurdity of resurrection, inadvertently set the stage for Jesus to reveal a profound truth about the transformed nature of eternal life, exposing their own theological ignorance. The entire scenario functions as a Test Case or Hypothetical Scenario, a common argumentative technique used in rabbinic discourse, where an extreme example is presented to challenge a theological position.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Luke 20:33, rooted in the Sadducees' skepticism, serves as a crucial theological pivot point, inviting a deeper understanding of the resurrection. Their question reveals a common human tendency to project earthly limitations and social constructs onto the divine and eternal realm. Jesus's subsequent response (Luke 20:34-38) transcends this limited perspective, clarifying that the resurrected state is not merely an extension of earthly life but a transformed existence, where believers "neither marry, nor are given in marriage" but "are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection." This profound teaching underscores God's power to create a new reality that surpasses human comprehension and earthly conventions.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 20:33, and Jesus's subsequent teaching, offers a powerful reminder that our understanding of God's eternal plan should not be confined by our present experiences or human logic. The Sadducees' error lay in their inability to conceive of a reality beyond their earthly frame of reference, particularly regarding marriage and family. For believers today, this passage encourages us to embrace the mystery and transformative power of the resurrection. It teaches us that while earthly relationships are precious and divinely ordained for this life, they are not eternal in their current form. The hope of the resurrection is not merely an extension of our current existence but a radical, glorious transformation into a new, spiritual reality where our relationship with God and with one another will be perfected in ways we cannot fully grasp now. This should inspire us to live with an eternal perspective, trusting in God's wisdom and power to bring about a future far grander than we can imagine.

Questions for Reflection

  • How might our own assumptions about heaven or the afterlife be limited by our earthly experiences and understanding?
  • What does Jesus's response to the Sadducees teach us about the nature of God's wisdom versus human logic?
  • How does the concept of a transformed, non-marital existence in the resurrection impact our view of earthly relationships and their ultimate purpose?
  • In what ways does this passage encourage us to trust in God's power to do "far more abundantly than all that we ask or think" (Ephesians 3:20) regarding our eternal future?

FAQ

Did the Sadducees genuinely want to understand the resurrection, or were they trying to trap Jesus?

Answer: The Sadducees' primary motivation was to trap Jesus and discredit Him publicly. As a sect that denied the resurrection, they sought to expose what they considered logical absurdities in the concept of an afterlife, particularly concerning the continuation of earthly relationships like marriage. Their question was a calculated attempt to force Jesus into a dilemma that would either contradict the Law of Moses or present a ridiculous scenario, thereby undermining His authority and teachings before the crowds. Jesus's response, however, turned their trap into an opportunity to teach a profound truth about the nature of the resurrected life, demonstrating their ignorance of both the Scriptures and the power of God (Matthew 22:29).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 20:33, though presenting a challenge to Jesus, ultimately serves to highlight the profound truth of the resurrection, which finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ. Jesus Himself is the embodiment of the resurrection, declaring, "I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live" (John 11:25). His own bodily resurrection from the dead is the foundational event that validates His claims and guarantees the future resurrection of all who believe in Him (1 Corinthians 15:20-22). The Sadducees' limited understanding of the afterlife, confined to earthly paradigms, is shattered by Jesus's teaching that in the resurrection, believers will be "like angels" (Luke 20:36), a transformed state made possible through His victory over death. Through Christ, the promise of a new creation and a new order of existence, free from the limitations and conventions of the present age, is secured, inviting all to partake in the glorious life that He alone provides (Revelation 21:1-5).

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 20 verses 27–38

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

This discourse with the Sadducees we had before, just as it is here, only that the description Christ gives of the future state is somewhat more full and large here. Observe here,

I. In every age there have been men of corrupt minds, that have endeavoured to subvert the fundamental principles of revealed religion. As there are deists now, who call themselves free-thinkers, but are really false-thinkers; so there were Sadducees in our Saviour's time, who bantered the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come, though they were plainly revealed in the Old Testament, and were articles of the Jewish faith. The Sadducees deny that there is any resurrection, any future state, so anastasis may signify; not only no return of the body to life, but no continuance of the soul in life, no world of spirits, no state of recompence and retribution for what was done in the body. Take away this, and all religion falls to the ground.

II. It is common for those that design to undermine any truth of God to perplex it, and load it with difficulties. So these Sadducees did; when they would weaken people's faith in the doctrine of the resurrection, they put a question upon the supposition of it, which they thought could not be answered either way to satisfaction. The case perhaps was matter of fact, at least it might be so, of a woman that had seven husbands. Now in the resurrection whose wife shall she be? whereas it was not at all material whose she was, for when death puts an end to that relation it is not to be resumed.

III. There is a great deal of difference between the state of the children of men on earth and that of the children of God in heaven, a vast unlikeness between this world and that world; and we wrong ourselves, and wrong the truth of Christ, when we form our notions of that world of spirits by our present enjoyments in this world of sense.

1.The children of men in this world marry, and are given in marriage, huioi tou aiōnos toutou - the children of this age, this generation, both good and bad, marry themselves and give their children in marriage. Much of our business in this world is to raise and build up families, and to provide for them. Much of our pleasure in this world is in our relations, our wives and children; nature inclines to it. Marriage is instituted for the comfort of human life, here in this state where we carry bodies about with us. It is likewise a remedy against fornication, that natural desires might not become brutal, but be under direction and control. The children of this world are dying and going off the stage, and therefore they marry and give their children in marriage, that they may furnish the world of mankind with needful recruits, that as one generation passeth away another may come, and that they may have some of their own offspring to leave the fruit of their labours to, especially that the chosen of God in future ages may be introduced, for it is a godly seed that is sought by marriage (Mal 2:15), a seed to serve the Lord, that shall be a generation to him.

2.The world to come is quite another thing; it is called that world, by way of emphasis and eminency. Note, There are more worlds than one; a present visible world, and a future invisible world; and it is the concern of every one of us to compare worlds, this world and that world, and give the preference in our thoughts and cares to that which deserves them. Now observe,

(1.)Who shall be the inhabitants of that world: They that shall be accounted worthy to obtain it, that is, that are interested in Christ's merit, who purchased it for us, and have a holy meetness for it wrought in them by the Spirit, whose business it is to prepare us for it. They have not a legal worthiness, upon account of any thing in them or done by them, but an evangelical worthiness, upon account of the inestimable price which Christ paid for the redemption of the purchased possession. It is a worthiness imputed by which we are glorified, as well as righteousness imputed by which we are justified; kataxiōthentes, they are made agreeable to that world. The disagreeableness that there is in the corrupt nature is taken away, and the dispositions of the soul are by the grace of God conformed to that state. They are by grace made and counted worthy to obtain that world; it intimates some difficulty in reaching after it, and danger of coming short. We must so run as that we may obtain. They shall obtain the resurrection from the dead, that is, the blessed resurrection; for that of condemnation (as Christ calls it, Joh 5:29), is rather a resurrection to death, a second death, an eternal death, than from death.

(2.)What shall be the happy state of the inhabitants of that world we cannot express or conceive, Co1 2:9. See what Christ here says of it. [1.] They neither marry nor are given in marriage. Those that have entered into the joy of their Lord are entirely taken up with that, and need not the joy of the bridegroom in his bride. The love in that world of love is all seraphic, and such as eclipses and loses the purest and most pleasing loves we entertain ourselves with in this world of sense. Where the body itself shall be a spiritual body, the delights of sense will all be banished; and where there is a perfection of holiness there is no occasion for marriage as a preservative from sin. Into the new Jerusalem there enters nothing that defiles. [2.] They cannot die any more; and this comes in as a reason why they do not marry. In this dying world there must be marriage, in order to the filling up of the vacancies made by death; but, where there are no burials, there is no need of weddings. This crowns the comfort of that world that there is no more death there, which sullies all the beauty, and damps all the comforts, of this world. Here death reigns, but thence it is for ever excluded. [3.] They are equal unto the angels. In the other evangelists it was said, They are as the angels - ōs angeloi, but here they are said to be equal to the angels, isangeloi - angels' peers; they have a glory and bliss no way inferior to that of the holy angels. They shall see the same sight, be employed in the same work, and share in the same joys, with the holy angels. Saints, when they come to heaven, shall be naturalized, and, though by nature strangers, yet, having obtained this freedom with a great sum, which Christ paid for them, they have in all respects equal privileges with them that were free-born, the angels that are the natives and aborigines of that country. They shall be companions with the angels, and converse with those blessed spirits that love them dearly, and with an innumerable company, to whom they are now come in faith, hope, and love. [4.] They are the children of God, and so they are as the angels, who are called the sons of God. In the inheritance of sons, the adoption of sons will be completed. Hence believers are said to wait for the adoption, even the redemption of the body, Rom 8:23. For till the body is redeemed from the grave the adoption is not completed. Now are we the sons of God, Jo1 3:2. We have the nature and disposition of sons, but that will not be perfected till we come to heaven. [5.] They are the children of the resurrection, that is, they are made capable of the employments and enjoyments of the future state; they are born to that world, belong to that family, had their education for it here, and shall there have their inheritance in it. They are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection. Note, God owns those only for his children that are the children of the resurrection, that are born from above, are allied to the world of spirits, and prepared for that world, the children of that family.

IV. It is an undoubted truth that there is another life after this, and there were eminent discoveries made of this truth in the early ages of the church (Luk 20:37, Luk 20:38): Moses showed this, as it was shown to Moses at the bush, and he hath shown it to us, when he calleth the Lord, as the Lord calleth himself, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, were then dead as to our world; they had departed out of it many years before, and their bodies were turned into dust in the cave of Machpelah; how then could God say, not I was, but I am the God or Abraham? It is absurd that the living God and Fountain of life should continue related to them as their God, if there were no more of them in being than what lay in that cave, undistinguished from common dust. We must therefore conclude that they were then in being in another world; for God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. Luke here adds, For all live unto him, that is, all who, like them, are true believers; though they are dead, yet they do live; their souls, which return to God who gave them (Ecc 12:7), live to him as the Father of spirits: and their bodies shall live again at the end of time by the power of God; for he calleth things that are not as though they were, because he is the God that quickens the dead, Rom 4:17. But there is more in it yet; when God called himself the God of these patriarchs, he meant that he was their felicity and portion, a God all-sufficient to them (Gen 17:1), their exceeding great reward, Gen 15:1. Now it is plain by their history that he never did that for them in this world which would answer the true intent and full extent of that great undertaking, and therefore there must be another life after this, in which he will do that for them that will amount to a discharge in full of that promise - that he would be to them a God, which he is able to do, for all live to him, and he has wherewithal to make every soul happy that lives to him; enough for all, enough for each.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 27–38. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215
The Stromata Book 3
If anyone ponders over this answer about the resurrection of the dead, he will find that the Lord is not rejecting marriage but is purging the expectation of physical desire in the resurrection. The words “the children of this age” were not spoken in contrast to the children of some other age. It is like saying, “those born in this generation,” who are children by force of birth, being born and engendering themselves, since without the process of birth no one will pass into this life. This process of birth is balanced by a process of decay and is no longer in store for the person who has once been cut off from life here.
TertullianAD 220
Against Marcion Book IV
For the question submitted to Christ had nothing to do with the god, but only with the state, of that world. It was: "Whose wife should this woman be in that world after the resurrection? " They thus subvert His answer respecting the essential question of marriage, and apply His words, "The children of this world marry and are given in marriage," as if they referred to the Creator's men, and His permission to them to marry; whilst they themselves whom the god of that world-that is, the rival god-accounted worthy of the resurrection, do not marry even here, because they are not children of this world.
CyprianAD 258
Treatise II. On the Dress of Virgins 22
Virgins, persevere in what you have begun to be. Persevere in what you will be. A great reward, a glorious prize for virtue, and an excellent reward for purity are reserved for you. Do you wish to know from what misery the virtue of continence is free and what advantage it provides? “I will multiply,” said God to the woman, “your sorrows and your groans, and in sorrow you will bring forth your children, and your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall have dominion over you.” You are free from this sentence. You do not fear the sorrows of women and their groans. You have no fear about the birth of children, nor is your husband your master, but your master and head is Christ, in the likeness of and in place of the man. Your fortune and condition are in common. The voice of the Lord says, “The children of this world give birth and are born. Those who will be found worthy of that world and of the resurrection from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage. They will not die anymore, for they are equal to the angels of God since they are the children of the resurrection.” What we shall be, you already have begun to be. You already have in this world the glory of the resurrection. You pass through the world without the pollution of the world. While you remain chaste and virgins, you are equal to the angels of God.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON TATIAN’S DIATESSARON 16.22
“The Sadducees came and were saying to him, ‘There is no resurrection of the dead.’ ” They are called Sadducees, that is “the just,” because they say, “We do not serve God for the sake of reward.” They do not await the resurrection, and for this reason they call themselves “the just,” since they say, “We should love God without a reward.”
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
According to the letter of the law, a woman is compelled to marry, however unwilling, in order that a brother may raise up seed to his brother who is dead. The letter therefore killeth, but the Spirit is the master of charity.

Mystically, this woman is the synagogue, which had seven husbands, as it is said to the Samaritan, Thou hadst five husbands, (John 4:18.) because the Samaritan follows only the five books of Moses, the synagogue for the most part seven. And from none of them has she received the seed of an hereditary offspring, and so can have no part with her husbands in the resurrection, because she perverts the spiritual meaning of the precept into a carnal. For not any carnal brother is pointed at, who should raise seed to his deceased brother, but that brother who from the dead people of the Jews should claim unto himself for wife the wisdom of the divine worship, and from it should raise up seed in the Apostles, who being left as it were unformed in the womb of the synagogue, have according to the election of grace been thought worthy to be preserved by the admixture of a new seed.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Anna, Serm. 4.) As the saints claim as their own the common Lord of the world, not as derogating from His dominion, but testifying their affection after the manner of lovers, who do not brook to love with many, but desire to express a certain peculiar and especial attachment; so likewise does God call Himself especially the God of these, not thereby narrowing but enlarging His dominion; for it is not so much the multitude of His subjects that manifests His power, as the virtue of His servants. Therefore He does not so delight in the name of the God of heaven and earth, as in that of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Now among men servants are thus denominated by their masters; for we say, 'The steward of such a man,' but on the contrary God is called the God of Abraham.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
SERMON 362.18
The Sadducees were a particular sect of the Jews that did not believe in the resurrection. When the Sadducees posed this problem, the Jews were uncertain, hesitant and could not really answer it, because they assumed that flesh and blood could possess the kingdom of God, that is, the perishable could possess imperishability. Along comes Truth. The misguided and misguiding Sadducees questioned him and posed that problem to the Lord. The Lord, who knew what he was saying and who wished us to believe what we did not know, gives an answer by his divine authority which we are to hold by faith. The apostle, for his part, explained it to the extent that it was granted him. We must try to understand this as fully as we can.
Philoxenus of MabbugAD 523
ON THE INDWELLING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT 1
The prophet’s words are applicable to those who sin without perceiving their sin. A sinner who has received baptism, although he may be dead toward his soul because he does not perceive his sin, he is alive to God because of the grace of baptism that he possesses. This agrees with the words “God is not of the dead but of the living, for they are all living in him.”
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
In the resurrection, therefore, of which of them will she be the wife? For the seven had her as wife. They oppose with the disgrace of the story, so that they may deny the truth of the resurrection. But mystically, these seven brothers who died without children correspond to the reprobate of all kinds, who, throughout the entirety of this life's span, which revolves in seven days, are barren of good works. When these are individually swept away by miserable death, ultimately even the worldly way of life itself, which they led without vital work, will pass away like an unfruitful wife.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
There were two heresies among the Jews, one of the Pharisees, who boasted in the righteousness of their traditions, and hence they were called by the people, "separated;" the other of the Sadducees, whose name signified "righteous," claiming to themselves that which they were not. When the former went away, the latter came to tempt Him.

(ut sup.) They devise this story in order to convict those of folly, who assert the resurrection of the dead. Hence they object a base fable, that they may deny the truth of the resurrection.

Or these seven brothers answer to the reprobate, who throughout the whole life of the world, which revolves in seven days, are fruitless in good works, and these being carried away by death one after another, at length the course of the evil world, as the barren woman, itself also passes away.

Which must not be taken as if only they who are worthy were either to rise again or be without marriage, but all sinners also shall rise again, and abide without marriage in that new world. But our Lord wished to mention only the elect, that He might incite the minds of His hearers to search into the glory of the resurrection.

Or they are equal to the angels, and the children of God, because made new by the glory of the resurrection, with no fear of death, with no spot of corruption, with no quality of an earthly condition, they rejoice in the perpetual beholding of God's presence.

Or He says this, that after having proved that the souls abide alter death, (which the Sadducees denied,) He might next introduce the resurrection also of the bodies, which together with the souls have done good or evil. But that is a true life which the just live unto God, even though they are dead in the body. Now to prove the truth of the resurrection, He might have brought much more obvious examples from the Prophets, but the Sadducees received only the five books of Moses, rejecting the oracles of the Prophets.

And since they had been defeated in argument, they ask Him no further questions, but seize Him, and deliver Him up to the Roman power. From which we may learn, that the poison of envy may indeed be subdued, but it is a hard thing to keep it at rest.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
This was their main object, to rebuke Him before the people, which they were unable to do because of the wonderful wisdom of His answer.

Now the Sadducees resting upon a weak foundation, did not believe in the doctrine of the resurrection. For imagining the future life in the resurrection to be carnal, they were justly misled, and hence reviling the doctrine of the resurrection as a thing impossible they invent the story, There were seven brothers, &c.

But our Lord shows that in the resurrection there will be no fleshly conversation, thereby overthrowing their doctrine together with its slender foundation; as it follows, And Jesus said unto them, The children of this world marry, &c.

As if He said, Because it is God who worketh in the resurrection, rightly are they called the sons of God, who are regenerated by the resurrection. For there is nothing carnal seen in the regeneration of them that rise again, there is neither coming together, nor the womb, nor birth.

Or to the reason above given the Lord added the testimony of Scripture, Now that the dead are raised, Moses also showed at the bush, (Exod. 3:6.) as the Lord saith, I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. As if he said, If the patriarchs have once returned to nothing so as not to live with God in the hope of a resurrection, He would not have said, I am, but, I was, for we are accustomed to speak of things dead and gone thus, I was the Lord or Master of such a thing; but now that He said, I am, He shows that He is the God and Lord of the living. This is what follows, But he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him. For though they have departed from life, yet live they with Him in the hope of a resurrection.

But when the Sadducees were silenced, the Scribes commend Jesus, for they were opposed to them, saying to Him, Master, thou hast well said.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 20:33 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.