Luke20

Jesus' authority is challenged by the chief priests and scribes, whom he silences with a counter-question about John's baptism. He then tells the parable of the wicked husbandmen, foretelling his rejection and the transfer of the kingdom. Jesus also deftly answers questions about paying tribute to Caesar and the resurrection, before warning against the hypocrisy of the scribes.

Jesus's Authority Challenged

One day, as Yeshua was teaching the people at the Temple, making known the Good News, the head cohanim and the Torah-teachers, along with the elders, came up to him

and said, “Tell us, what s’mikhah do you have that authorizes you to do these things? Who gave you this s’mikhah?”

He answered, “I too will ask you a question. Tell me,

the immersion of Yochanan — was it from Heaven or from a human source?”

They discussed it among themselves, saying, “If we say, ‘From Heaven,’ he will say, ‘Then why didn’t you believe him?’

But if we say, ‘From a human source,’ all the people will stone us, because they’re convinced that Yochanan was a prophet.”

So they answered, “We don’t know where it came from.”

Yeshua said to them, “Then I won’t tell you by what s’mikhah I do these things.”

Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers

Next Yeshua told the people this parable: “A man planted a vineyard, rented it to tenant-farmers and went away for a long time.

When the time came, he sent a servant to the tenants to receive his share of the crop from the vineyard; but the tenants beat him up and sent him away empty-handed.

He sent another servant; they beat him too, insulted him and sent him away empty-handed.

He sent yet a third; this one they wounded and threw out.

“Then the owner of the vineyard said, ‘What am I to do? I will send my son, whom I love; maybe they will respect him.’

But when the tenants saw him, they discussed it among themselves and said, ‘This is the heir; let’s kill him, so that the inheritance will be ours!’

And they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. “Now what will the owner of the vineyard do to them?

He will come and put an end to those tenants and give the vineyard to others!” When the people heard this, they said, “Heaven forbid!”

But Yeshua looked searchingly at them and said, “Then what is this which is written in the Tanakh, ‘The very rock which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone’?

Whoever falls on that stone will be broken in pieces; but if it falls on him, he will be crushed to powder!”

The Torah-teachers and the head cohanim would have seized him at that very moment, because they knew that he had aimed this parable at them, but they were afraid of the people.

Tribute to Caesar

So they kept a close watch on the situation. They sent spies who hypocritically represented themselves as righteous, so that they might seize hold of something Yeshua said, as an excuse to hand him over to the jurisdiction and authority of the governor.

They put to him this sh’eilah: “Rabbi, we know that you speak and teach straightforwardly, showing no partiality but really teaching what God’s way is.

Does Torah permit us to pay taxes to the Roman Emperor or not?”

But he, spotting their craftiness, said to them,

“Show me a denarius! Whose name and picture does it have?” “The Emperor’s,” they replied.

“Then,” he said to them, “give the Emperor what belongs to the Emperor. And give God what belongs to God!”

They were unable to trap him by anything he said publicly; indeed, amazed at his answer, they fell silent.

The Sadducees and the Resurrection

Some Tz’dukim, who say there is no resurrection, came to Yeshua

and put to him a sh’eilah: “Rabbi, Moshe wrote for us that if a man dies leaving a wife but no children, his brother must take the wife and have children to preserve the man’s family line.

Now there were seven brothers. The first took a wife and died childless,

then the second

and third took her, and likewise all seven, but they all died without leaving children.

Lastly, the woman also died.

In the Resurrection, which one’s wife will she be? For all seven were married to her.”

Yeshua said to them, “In this age, men and women marry;

but those judged worthy of the age to come, and of resurrection from the dead, do not get married,

because they can no longer die. Being children of the Resurrection, they are like angels; indeed, they are children of God.

“But even Moshe showed that the dead are raised; for in the passage about the bush, he calls Adonai ‘the God of Avraham, the God of Yitz’chak and the God of Ya‘akov.’

Now he is not God of the dead, but of the living — to him all are alive.”

Some of the Torah-teachers answered, “Well spoken, Rabbi.”

For they no longer dared put to him a sh’eilah.

Whose Son is the Christ?

But he said to them, “How is it that people say the Messiah is David’s son?”

For David himself says in the book of Psalms,

‘Adonai said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool.” ’

David thus calls him ‘Lord.’ So how can he be David’s son?”

Warning Against the Scribes

Within the hearing of all the people, Yeshua said to his talmidim,

“Watch out for the kind of Torah-teachers that like to walk around in robes and be greeted deferentially in the marketplaces, the kind that like to have the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets,

the kind that swallow up widows’ houses while making a show of davvening at great length. Their punishment will be all the worse!”

Study Notes for Luke 20

Verse 1

This scene occurs during the final week of Jesus's ministry in Jerusalem. The chief priests and scribes confront Jesus because his public teaching and actions (like cleansing the Temple) usurped their established religious authority.

Verse 2

The core question is one of *exousia* (authority). The leaders sought a legal or political basis for Jesus’s actions, aiming to force him to claim either divine or revolutionary power, thereby providing grounds for arrest.

Verse 4

Jesus employs a brilliant counter-question, putting the leaders in an impossible dilemma. John the Baptist, whom the leaders rejected, directly testified to Jesus’s authority.

Verse 5

The leaders’ internal debate reveals their motivation: they are not seeking truth, but calculating the political and social risks of their answer.

Verse 9

This parable is a clear allegory drawn from Isaiah 5:1–7, where the vineyard represents Israel. Jesus is speaking directly to the crowd, but the message is aimed squarely at the chief priests and scribes.

Verse 13

The term 'beloved son' distinguishes Jesus from the previous messengers (the prophets). It asserts his unique, divine identity as the heir, whose arrival should have commanded reverence.

Verse 14

The vinedressers' motivation is greed and usurpation of the inheritance. This represents the Jewish leaders’ desire to maintain control over Israel, even if it meant rejecting the Son of God.

Verse 16

The destruction of the tenants and the granting of the vineyard to 'others' is a prophecy of judgment against the unfaithful leaders and the eventual transfer of covenant privileges to the Church (including believing Gentiles).

Verse 17

Jesus quotes Psalm 118:22, identifying himself as the 'stone which the builders rejected.' This emphasizes that his rejection and subsequent exaltation were foretold in Scripture.

Verse 18

This verse warns of two levels of judgment: stumbling over the stone (rejecting Christ) results in brokenness, while the stone falling on someone (final judgment) results in complete destruction.

Verse 19

The religious authorities understood the parable perfectly, recognizing that Jesus accused them of rejecting God’s messengers and planning to murder the Son.

Verse 20

The leaders sent spies who pretended to be morally upright or unbiased. Their goal was to force Jesus into making a treasonous statement against Rome that could be used by the Governor (Pilate).

Verse 22

The question concerns the *tributum capitis* (poll tax), a deeply resented tax paid directly to Rome. A 'yes' answer would alienate the Jewish populace; a 'no' answer was sedition.

Verse 25

Jesus resolves the dilemma by establishing two distinct realms of obligation. Since the coin bears Caesar’s image, it belongs to him; since humanity bears God’s image (Genesis 1:27), ultimate loyalty belongs to God.

Verse 27

The Sadducees were an aristocratic sect who accepted only the Pentateuch (the Law of Moses) and denied doctrines like the resurrection, angels, and spirits.

Verse 28

Their question is based on the law of levirate marriage (Deuteronomy 25:5), which required a brother to marry his deceased brother’s widow to maintain the family line. They use this extreme hypothetical case to ridicule the idea of resurrection.

Verse 34

Jesus corrects their fundamental error: they projected the conditions of the temporary, physical world onto the eternal, resurrected world.

Verse 36

In the resurrection, believers will share an immortal, non-procreative existence, likened to the angels. The purpose of marriage (procreation and continuity) ceases when death is overcome.

Verse 37

Jesus proves the resurrection using the Sadducees’ own accepted text (Exodus 3:6). By referring to the patriarchs in the present tense ('God of Abraham...'), Moses shows that they are not annihilated but are presently alive with God.

Verse 41

Jesus now shifts from defense to offense, challenging the leaders’ understanding of the Messiah's identity, which they typically limited to a political descendant of David.

Verse 42

Jesus quotes Psalm 110:1, a highly recognized Messianic psalm. The question hinges on how David could call his own descendant 'Lord' (Gr. *Kyrios*).

Verse 44

The question forces the leaders to confront the dual nature of the Messiah: he must be both a human descendant of David ('son') and a divine sovereign ('Lord').

Verse 45

Having silenced his antagonists, Jesus gives a public warning to the disciples and the crowd regarding the hypocrisy of the religious elites.

Verse 46

Jesus condemns the scribes for seeking outward status (long robes, greetings) and honorific titles, prioritizing public recognition over genuine humility and service.

Verse 47

To 'devour widows’ houses' means exploiting the vulnerable through legal or financial manipulation, while masking this injustice with ostentatious displays of 'long prayers.' This hypocrisy merits 'greater damnation' (severer judgment).

Use ← → arrow keys to navigate

Luke20

Jesus's Authority Challenged

Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers

Tribute to Caesar

The Sadducees and the Resurrection

Whose Son is the Christ?

Warning Against the Scribes

Reading Style

Typeface

Font Size 19px

Reading Width 45 chars

Options