TRV
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Deuteronomy 19:14–21. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is a statute for the preventing of frauds and perjuries; for the divine law takes care of men's rights and properties, and has made a hedge about them. Such a friend is it to human society and men's civil interest.
I.A law against frauds, Deu 19:14.
1.Here is an implicit direction given to the first planters of Canaan to fix land-marks, according to the distribution of the land to the several tribes and families by lot. Note, It is the will of God that every one should know his own, and that all good means should be used to prevent encroachments and the doing and suffering of wrong. When right is settled, care must be taken that it be not afterwards unsettled, and that, if possible, no occasion of dispute may arise.
2.An express law to posterity not to remove those land-marks which were thus fixed at first, by which a man secretly got that to himself which was his neighbour's. This, without doubt, is a moral precept, and still binding, and to us it forbids,
(1.)The invading of any man's right, and taking to ourselves that which is not our own, by any fraudulent arts or practices, as by forging, concealing, destroying, or altering deeds and writings (which are our land-marks, to which appeals are made), or by shifting hedges, meer-stones, and boundaries. Though the land-marks were set by the hand of man, yet he was a thief and a robber by the law of God that removed them. Let every man be content with his own lot, and just to his neighbours, and then we shall have no land-marks removed.
(2.)It forbids the sowing of discord among neighbours, and doing any thing to occasion strife and law-suits, which is done (and it is very ill done) by confounding those things which should determine disputes and decide controversies. And,
(3.)It forbids breaking in upon the settled order and constitution of civil government, and the altering of ancient usages without just cause. This law supports the honour of prescriptions. Consuetudo facit jus - Custom is to be held as law.
II.A law against perjuries, which enacts two things:
- 1. That a single witness should never be admitted to give evidence in a criminal cause, so as that sentence should be passed upon his testimony, Deu 19:15. This law we had before, Num 35:30, and in this book, Deu 17:6. This was enacted in favour to the prisoner, whose life and honour should not lie at the mercy of a particular person that had a pique against him, and for caution to the accuser not to say that which he could not corroborate by the testimony of another. It is a just shame which this law puts upon mankind as false and not to be trusted; every man is by it suspected: and it is the honour of God's grace that the record he has given concerning his Son is confirmed both in heaven and in earth by three witnesses, Jo1 5:7. Let God be true and every man a liar, Rom 3:4. 2. That a false witness should incur the same punishment which was to have been inflicted upon the person he accused. If two, or three, or many witnesses, concurred in a false testimony, they were all liable to be prosecuted upon this law. (2.) The person wronged or brought into peril by the false testimony is supposed to be the appellant, Deu 19:17. And yet if the person were put to death upon the evidence, and afterwards it appeared to be false, any other person, or the judges themselves, ex officio - by virtue of their office, might call the false witness to account. (3.) Causes of this kind, having more than ordinary difficulty in them, were to be brought before the supreme court, The priests and judges, who are said to be before the Lord, because, as other judges sat in the gates of their cities, so these at the gate of the sanctuary, Deu 17:12. (4.) There must be great care in the trial, Deu 19:18. A diligent inquisition must be made into the characters of the persons, and all the circumstances of the case, which must be compared, that the truth might be found out, which, where it is thus faithfully and impartially enquired into, Providence, it may be hoped, will particularly advance the discovery of. (5.) If it appeared that a man had knowingly and maliciously borne false witness against his neighbour, though the mischief he designed him thereby was not effected, he must undergo the same penalty which his evidence would have brought his neighbour under, Deu 19:19. Nec lex est justior ulla - Nor could any law be more just. If the crime he accused his neighbour of was to be punished with death, the false witness must be put to death; if with stripes, he must be beaten; if with a pecuniary mulct, he was to be fined the sum. And because to those who considered not the heinousness of the crime, and the necessity of making this provision against it, it might seem hard to punish a man so severely for a few words' speaking, especially when no mischief did actually follow, it is added: Thy eye shall not pity, Deu 19:21. No man needs to be more merciful than God. The benefit that will accrue to the public from this severity will abundantly recompense it: Those that remain shall hear and fear, Deu 19:20. Such exemplary punishments will be warnings to others not to attempt any such mischief, when they see how he that made the pit and digged it has fallen into the ditch which he made.
Historical interpretation
Four Centuries of Reception
6 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
This is the third time I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established. [Deuteronomy 19:15] I told you before, and foretell you, as if I were present, the second time; and being absent now I write to them which heretofore have sinned, and to all other, that, if I come again, I will not spare
Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. [Deuteronomy 19:15] And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.
[Christ] did then truly rise, and after he had risen, he was seen again by his disciples. And the twelve disciples were witnesses of his resurrection, testifying not with words meant to please but contending for the truth of the resurrection even unto torture and death. Further, “on the word of two or three witnesses every word may be confirmed,” according to Scripture. There are twelve witnesses to the resurrection of Christ, and do you still disbelieve in the resurrection?
Therefore if a people composed of a great multitude was found a false witness, how must it be understood, “In the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall stand,” except that in this way. The Trinity, in which is unending stability of truth, was revealed through a mystery. Do you want to have a good case? Have two or three witnesses, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.
As a matter of fact, a single witness generally speaks the truth, while a mob may tell lies. And the world, in its conversion to Christianity, believed one apostle preaching the gospel rather than the mistaken multitude who persecuted him.
At the birth of the Savior, then, there was fulfilled that divine sentence which says, “Every word shall stand with two or three witnesses.” For see, the Word of God is born with the Trinity as witness. For indeed, in the womb of holy Mary—when the Holy Spirit comes upon her, when the Most High overshadows her, when Christ is begotten—there is implied a confession of faith in him.
Continue studying Deuteronomy 19:15 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Deuteronomy 19:15 articulates a foundational principle of justice within ancient Israelite jurisprudence, unequivocally stating that no accusation of wrongdoing, whether described as "iniquity" or "sin," can be sustained or proven against an individual based solely on the testimony of a single witness. Instead, for any legal "matter" to be definitively "established" and held as truth, it absolutely requires the corroborating testimony of at least two, or ideally three, independent witnesses. This divine decree served as a critical safeguard against false accusations, promoting fairness, truthfulness, and integrity within the judicial system of God's covenant people, reflecting His own righteous character.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed within the Deuteronomic Code (chapters 12-26), a comprehensive collection of laws and statutes designed to govern Israel's life in the Promised Land. Specifically, Deuteronomy 19 focuses intently on the administration of justice and the protection of life and property. Immediately preceding this law, the chapter details the establishment of cities of refuge for unintentional homicide (vv. 1-13) and prohibits the illicit moving of boundary markers (v. 14), both of which underscore the sanctity of human life and the integrity of property rights. Following Deuteronomy 19:15, the text swiftly addresses the severe consequences for a false witness, prescribing that the punishment intended for the accused should fall upon the accuser. This immediate juxtaposition highlights the gravity of testimony and the divine demand for absolute truth. Thus, Deuteronomy 19:15 functions as a pivotal legal standard, setting the evidentiary bar for all judicial proceedings within this divinely ordained framework of justice.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the broader ancient Near Eastern context, various legal systems existed, and the concept of witnesses was common. However, the Mosaic Law, as revealed in Deuteronomy, distinguished itself through its divine origin and its profound emphasis on protecting the individual from injustice, thereby reflecting the character of a righteous and just God. Israelite society was fundamentally communal, with legal disputes often resolved by elders gathered at the city gate. In such a society, an individual's reputation and honor were paramount, making false accusations particularly devastating and socially ruinous. The stringent requirement for multiple, corroborating witnesses served as a radical and necessary safeguard against the abuse of power, personal vendettas, or unsubstantiated claims, especially in an era where formal investigative procedures were limited. This law ensured that an individual's life, liberty, and property were not jeopardized by mere allegations, establishing a remarkably high standard for legal proof that set Israel's justice system apart from many of its contemporaries.
Key Themes
Deuteronomy 19:15 contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes found throughout Deuteronomy and the Pentateuch. Central to this verse is the theme of Justice and Righteousness, as God commands His people to administer laws with unwavering fairness, mirroring His own inherently just character. The law's insistence on corroboration directly addresses the theme of Protection of the Innocent, safeguarding individuals from malicious, erroneous, or biased accusations. It vigorously promotes Truthfulness and Veracity in all legal proceedings, making it exceedingly difficult for falsehoods to prevail in matters of consequence. This requirement for multiple witnesses also establishes a foundational principle of Due Process, ensuring that legal matters are "established" on solid, verifiable evidence, rather than mere suspicion or singular testimony. Ultimately, this command powerfully underscores the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Law, where God's commands provide the indispensable framework for a just, orderly, and morally upright society, reflecting His profound desire for His covenant people to live in integrity, equity, and fidelity to His statutes.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term concretely refers to an individual who testifies or provides evidence, and abstractly, to the testimony itself. In Deuteronomy 19:15, it emphasizes the human agent whose verbal declaration is presented in a legal context. The law's focus on the "mouth" of the witness underscores the importance of direct, verbal testimony. The requirement for multiple "witnesses" highlights that the validity of a claim rests not on the word of one, but on the corroboration provided by several independent attestations, thereby safeguarding against individual bias or error.
This word denotes an offense, a transgression, or a missing of the mark, and can also refer to its penalty or even a sin offering. Its inclusion alongside "iniquity" (H5771, ʻâvôn', perversity/moral evil) and the verbal form "sinneth" (H2398, hâṭâʼ', to miss/sin) emphasizes the comprehensive scope of the law. It applies to any and all moral or legal wrongdoings, whether intentional or unintentional, ensuring that no serious accusation, regardless of its specific nature, can be sustained by a single testimony. This breadth underscores the law's protective intent for all accused individuals.
This primitive root means "to rise," "to stand," "to confirm," or "to make firm." It appears twice in the verse, first as "rise up" (against a man, i.e., to bring a charge) and then as "be established" (the matter). This repetition creates a powerful thematic link: for an accusation to truly "stand" or "rise up" as a valid legal claim, it must be "established" or made firm by the corroborating testimonies of multiple witnesses. It signifies that the truth of the matter has been sufficiently demonstrated and confirmed, providing a solid, unshakeable basis for legal judgment and action.
Verse Breakdown
"One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth:"
This opening prohibition unequivocally states that a singular testimony, regardless of the nature or severity of the alleged offense ("any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth"), is insufficient to bring a formal charge, initiate legal proceedings, or secure a conviction against an individual. This clause serves as a fundamental safeguard, protecting the accused from arbitrary, malicious, or erroneous accusations and highlighting the inherent vulnerability of a person facing a single, uncorroborated claim in a legal setting.
"at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses,"
This clause provides the positive requirement and the necessary standard for legal proof. The idiomatic phrase "at the mouth of" literally refers to the verbal testimony, emphasizing that the witnesses must personally speak and attest to the facts of the case. The specification of "two or three" sets a clear minimum threshold (two) while allowing for an even stronger degree of certainty and corroboration (three). This plural requirement significantly reduces the likelihood of error, fabrication, collusion, or misinterpretation, ensuring a more robust and undeniable basis for legal judgment.
"shall the matter be established."
This concluding clause states the ultimate purpose and desired outcome of the multi-witness requirement. "The matter" refers to the accusation, the charge, or the legal case at hand. For this "matter" to be "established" means it must be confirmed, proven, validated, and made legally binding. It signifies that the truth of the accusation has been sufficiently demonstrated through the corroborating testimonies, providing a firm, verifiable foundation upon which a righteous and just judgment can be rendered by the court.
Literary Devices
The language of Deuteronomy 19:15 employs several potent literary devices to convey its legal and theological import. Repetition is prominently featured in the phrase "for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth," which serves to emphasize the comprehensive and universal scope of the law, applying to all conceivable transgressions and leaving no room for exceptions based on the nature of the offense. This precise, prescriptive language is characteristic of Legal Formulary, typical of ancient Near Eastern law codes, clearly stating both the prohibition and the mandatory requirement. The verse also employs a stark Contrast, juxtaposing the inherent insufficiency of a single witness's testimony with the absolute necessity of multiple witnesses, thereby highlighting the fundamental shift in legal standing that corroboration provides. Finally, the strategic use of the same Hebrew root (qûwm) for both "rise up" (to accuse) and "established" (to prove) creates a subtle yet profound Wordplay or Thematic Linkage. This linguistic connection suggests that for an accusation to truly "stand" or be "established" as legitimate in a court of law, it must be firmly supported by multiple testimonies, thereby reflecting the divine standard of truth and justice.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The divine command in Deuteronomy 19:15 transcends a mere practical legal guideline; it is a profound theological statement about God's immutable character and His fervent desire for His people to embody righteousness. This law directly reflects the Lord's absolute justice, His unwavering commitment to truth, and His particular concern for protecting the vulnerable from the devastating impact of false accusations. It underscores the sacredness of human life, reputation, and freedom, asserting that these must never be jeopardized by unsubstantiated claims. The principle teaches that truth is weighty and requires solid, verifiable grounding, mirroring God's own unshakeable truthfulness and reliability. The requirement for multiple witnesses serves as a divine bulwark against inherent human tendencies towards deception, bias, and hasty judgment, calling Israel to embody a divine standard of integrity and meticulousness in all its legal and communal dealings. This law is a tangible outworking of the covenant relationship, where justice and righteousness are paramount expressions of faithfulness to God and love for one's neighbor.
Reflection and Application
Deuteronomy 19:15 offers timeless wisdom that extends far beyond the ancient Israelite courtroom, providing a profound ethical framework for all human interactions and decision-making. In a contemporary world saturated with information, often unverified, and prone to the rapid spread of hearsay and uncorroborated claims, this verse serves as a vital call to discernment, caution, and intellectual humility. It teaches us to be exceedingly slow to believe accusations, especially those originating from a single, uncorroborated source, and to actively resist the urge to participate in gossip, rumor-mongering, or the dissemination of unconfirmed information. This principle compels us to cultivate a culture of integrity, diligently seeking truth and verification before forming judgments, making decisions, or taking actions that could harm another's reputation, livelihood, or emotional well-being. It serves as a powerful reminder that true justice is not merely about punishment but about the meticulous pursuit of truth, the protection of the innocent, and the upholding of fairness, all of which reflect God's own character. In our personal relationships, our professional environments, and our faith communities, embracing this principle fosters trust, promotes accountability, and ensures that critical decisions are made on solid, verifiable ground rather than fleeting claims or personal biases.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does the law specify "two or three" witnesses, not just "two"?
The specification of "two or three" witnesses provides both a minimum standard and a stronger, more robust degree of certainty. Two witnesses are the absolute minimum required to "establish" a matter, offering sufficient corroboration to overcome the inherent doubt associated with a single, unverified testimony. The inclusion of "or three" offers an even more formidable level of confirmation, making it significantly harder for collusion, error, or misrepresentation to occur. It provides an added layer of assurance, particularly in cases of grave consequence, and can also help resolve potential ambiguities or contradictory accounts between two witnesses, allowing a third to provide clarity. This demonstrates the law's profound commitment to thoroughness, undeniable proof, and the highest standard of justice.
How does this ancient law relate to modern legal systems?
The principle articulated in Deuteronomy 19:15 is a foundational cornerstone of many modern legal systems, particularly those influenced by common law traditions. The concept of "corroborating evidence" — requiring additional proof beyond a single testimony to convict in certain serious cases (e.g., perjury, treason, or sexual assault in some jurisdictions) — directly echoes this biblical standard. It underpins fundamental legal principles such as due process and the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt by sufficient, verifiable evidence. While modern systems have evolved with complex rules of evidence, the core idea that a person's fate, liberty, or reputation should not rest on a solitary, unverified claim remains a vital and enduring safeguard against injustice.
Does this apply to all accusations, or only serious ones?
The comprehensive phrasing "for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth" suggests a broad application to all legal or serious accusations that could lead to punishment, significant social consequence, or loss of standing. While practical application might vary for minor infractions or everyday disagreements, the underlying principle of meticulously verifying claims before judgment applies broadly across all aspects of communal life. Historically, this law was most rigorously applied in cases involving capital punishment or severe penalties, as explicitly seen in Deuteronomy 17:6 and Numbers 35:30. However, the profound spirit of the law encourages a general caution against accepting any unverified accusation, promoting truthfulness, fairness, and a high standard of integrity in all interpersonal and communal dealings.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Deuteronomy 19:15, with its divine mandate for multiple witnesses to establish truth and ensure justice, finds its ultimate fulfillment and most profound significance in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. While the Old Testament law established a vital legal precedent for human courts, God Himself, in His supreme act of justice and salvation, provided an overwhelming abundance of witnesses to the truth of His Son. Jesus Himself affirmed this very principle, declaring, "It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true. I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me" (John 8:17-18). The entire narrative of Christ's life, His atoning death, and His glorious resurrection is established not by a single, isolated claim, but by a multitude of divinely appointed and humanly attested witnesses. The apostles were specifically commissioned to be His "witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth" (Acts 1:8). The resurrection, the foundational cornerstone of Christian faith, is powerfully attested by over five hundred people, as recorded in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8. Furthermore, the Holy Spirit bears an internal, divine witness with our spirit that we are indeed children of God (Romans 8:16), providing an undeniable corroboration of our adoption and faith. Thus, the truth of the Gospel, the reality of God's saving work in Christ, is established not merely by two or three human witnesses, but by a symphony of divine and human testimonies, culminating in God's own irrefutable and final witness through His Son (Hebrews 1:1-3), making the "matter" of our salvation eternally and perfectly established in Christ Jesus.