1 Corinthians11
Imitate Paul as He Follows Christ
Headship and Distinctions in Worship
Condemnation of Divisions at Meals
The Institution of the Lord’s Supper
Warning Against Unworthy Participation
Study Notes for 1 Corinthians 11
Verse 1
Paul establishes his authority and example, grounding his instructions not in personal preference but in the pattern set by Christ, setting the tone for the practical commands that follow.
Verse 2
Paul offers initial praise for their adherence to traditions, softening the approach before he addresses the serious disorder and abuses that follow.
Verse 3
This verse establishes a theological hierarchy (God -> Christ -> Man -> Woman), foundational to Paul's argument about maintaining appropriate distinctions and roles in public worship.
Verse 4
A man praying or prophesying uncovered signifies respect for Christ, his ultimate head. Covering the head was often a sign of subordination in Greco-Roman culture, inappropriate for the man who represents God’s glory (v. 7).
Verse 5
To pray or prophesy uncovered dishonors the woman's head (her husband or the authority structure). Shaving the head was a sign of shame, often associated with prostitution or severe punishment.
Verse 7
Paul connects the man’s uncovered head to the creation narrative (Genesis 1), where man is created directly as the 'image and glory of God,' while the woman’s glory is derived from the man.
Verse 10
The phrase 'power on her head' refers to the covering, symbolizing her authority (or subjection to authority). The reference to 'because of the angels' is debated, possibly meaning angels observe proper order in worship.
Verse 11
Paul balances the hierarchy (vv. 3-10) with the essential mutuality of men and women 'in the Lord,' emphasizing their interdependence and equal spiritual standing in Christ.
Verse 15
Paul introduces a cultural/natural argument: long hair functions as a natural covering. This suggests that the custom Paul advocates is rooted in modesty and gender distinction apparent in creation.
Verse 16
This serves as a concluding statement, emphasizing that if anyone wishes to argue, the consistent practice ('custom') of the universal church supports Paul’s directive.
Verse 17
Paul shifts topics abruptly to address a more grievous fault: their communal gatherings are causing harm rather than spiritual benefit.
Verse 18
The 'church' (Gk. *ekklesia*) here refers specifically to the gathering of believers. The divisions (*schismata*) were visible during corporate worship, particularly at the communal meal.
Verse 19
Paul suggests that factions (*haireseis*, often translated ‘heresies’) serve a positive, albeit unintended, purpose: revealing who is genuine and approved by God.
Verse 20
The communal meal was so corrupted by selfish behavior (v. 21) that it no longer resembled the sacred commemoration of Christ’s sacrifice, thus it was 'not to eat the Lord’s supper.'
Verse 21
The wealthy were arriving early and consuming their own abundant provisions, leaving the poorer members hungry and shaming them, contradicting the spirit of Christian fellowship.
Verse 23
Paul asserts the apostolic authority of his teaching by citing direct tradition received 'from the Lord,' confirming the divine origin of the communion practice.
Verse 25
The 'new testament' (or covenant) emphasizes that Christ’s blood inaugurated the new covenant relationship between God and humanity, fulfilling the promises of Jeremiah 31:31.
Verse 26
The Lord’s Supper is both a commemorative act and a public proclamation ('show the Lord’s death') of the gospel, active until Christ’s return (*parousia*).
Verse 27
To partake 'unworthily' is not about personal sinlessness, but about treating the elements irreverently or participating without regard for the unity of the church (the Body of Christ).
Verse 29
The word 'damnation' (Gk. *krima*) means judgment or condemnation, referring to God's temporal discipline. Failing to 'discern the Lord’s body' means failing to recognize the sacred nature of the elements and the unity of the church community.
Verse 30
Paul attributes the physical sickness and deaths ('sleep') in the community directly to God's corrective judgment upon those who profaned the Lord's Supper through selfish behavior.
Verse 32
God’s judgment on believers (chastening) is corrective discipline, intended to prevent eternal condemnation alongside the unbelieving world.
Verse 33
This provides a practical solution: the Corinthians must restore fellowship by waiting for one another, ensuring the meal is a shared, unifying experience.
Verse 34
Paul separates the function of satisfying hunger (which should be done at home) from the sacred observance of the Lord’s Supper, restoring reverence and order to the communion service.