Skip to content

1 Corinthians 11:4

“Headship and Distinctions in Worship”1 Corinthians 11:2–16

King James Version
Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Every G3956 man G435 praying G4336 or G2228 prophesying G4395, having G2192 his head G2776 covered G2596, dishonoureth G2617 his G846 head G2776.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoreth his head.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonors his head.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Euery man praying or prophecying hauing any thing on his head, dishonoureth his head.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
Every man praying or prophesying, having the head covered, doth dishonour his head,

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
12 Greek words
  1. ΠᾶςPasEveryG3956A-NSMAdjective Nominative Singular Masculine
  2. ἀνὴρanērmanG435N-NSMNoun Nominative Singular Masculine
  3. προσευχόμενοςproseuchomenosprayingG4336V-PNP-NSMVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  4. ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
  5. προφητεύωνprophēteuōnprophesyingG4395V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  6. κατὰkata[anything] onG2596PREPPreposition
  7. κεφαλῆςkephalēs[his] headG2776N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
  8. ἔχωνechōnhavingG2192V-PAP-NSMVerb Present Active Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
  9. καταισχύνειkataischuneihe dishonorsG2617V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  10. τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
  11. κεφαλὴνkephalēnheadG2776N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
  12. αὐτοῦautouof himG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 28,605 of 31,102 · 92.0%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

A man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonours his head, both his own head and Christ, who is his head.

“Every man praying or prophesying,”

Pâs, “every”, with anḗr. Proseúchomai is prayer to God and prophēteúō is inspired speech for the church, both spoken aloud in the assembly.

“having his head covered,”

Échō, “having”, with katá, “down”: something hanging down over the head.

“dishonoureth his head.”

Kataischýnō, to disgrace. Autós gives “his”, and the head shamed is his own head and also Christ.

Passage study1 Corinthians 11:2–16

Headship and Head Coverings in Worship

Summary

Paul opens a new part of his letter by praising the Corinthians for holding to the teaching he handed on to them. Then he sets out an order that runs from God to Christ, from Christ to the man, and from the man to the woman, and he applies it to the way men and women pray and prophesy in the gathered church. A man prays with his head uncovered, because he is the image and glory of God. A woman prays with her head covered, as a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels. Paul grounds this in creation, and then at once adds that in the Lord the man and the woman each need the other, and that all things are of God. He asks the Corinthians to judge what is fitting, points to what nature teaches about long hair, and closes with the practice of all the churches of God. In this passage we learn that God made man and woman distinct, made them for each other, and is honoured by the way his people come before him.

Paul praises the church for keeping what he delivered

Paul begins with praise. The verb epainéō means to commend or applaud, and it is a welcome word in a letter that has already had to deal with divisions, immorality and lawsuits (1 Corinthians 1:10–17, 5:1–13, 6:1–11). He commends them first because they “remember me in all things”. The verb mnáomai means to bear in mind or keep in memory, and it tells us the Corinthians had held on to Paul and to all he taught them while he was with them. “In all things” is warm and broad, and the rest of the chapter shows that some matters still need setting right. Paul affirms what is good before he corrects, which is his pastoral way throughout.

He commends them also because they “keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you”. “Ordinances” translates parádosis, a handing over, and so a precept or tradition passed from one to another. It comes from paradídōmi, to hand over, the verb behind “delivered”. Paul received the teaching, handed it on, and the church kept it. In this same letter he speaks this way of the Lord’s Supper, which he “received of the Lord” and delivered to them (1 Corinthians 11:23–26), and of the gospel of Christ’s death and resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3–4).

These traditions are the teaching of Christ’s apostle, a steward of the mysteries of God (1 Corinthians 4:1–2). Jesus rebuked those who were “laying aside the commandment of God” to “hold the tradition of men” (Mark 7:8), and the traditions Paul delivered carry God’s commandment to the church. So the New Testament tells believers to hold fast the traditions they were taught (2 Thessalonians 2:15), to “Hold fast the form of sound words” (2 Timothy 1:13), and to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3). Jesus sent his apostles to teach all that he had commanded (Matthew 28:19–20), so keeping what they delivered is keeping the word of Christ himself.

From here Paul takes up two matters of public worship, the covering of the head in these verses and the Lord’s Supper after them (1 Corinthians 11:17–34).

The order of headship: God, Christ, man and woman

Verse 3 is the foundation for everything that follows. “But I would have you know” joins the connective dé (“but” or “now”) to thélō, to will or wish, and eídō, to know, properly to see. Paul wants this understood before he gives any instruction: “the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.”

The word kephalḗ means the head of the body, and Paul often uses it figuratively. He calls Christ head over all things to the church, which is his body (Ephesians 1:22–23, Colossians 1:18), and there it plainly speaks of authority and leadership. Believers differ on the exact sense in this verse. Some hold that “head” here means authority, so that Christ leads every man, the man leads the woman, and the Father is head of the Son. Others give weight to the sense of source or origin, because Paul goes on to say that the woman was taken out of the man (Genesis 2:18–24). Many hold that Paul means both, and verses 8 and 9 support that, since they ground the order in where the woman came from and why she was made.

The word for man is anḗr, an adult male, and it can also mean a husband. Paul uses it here in place of anthrōpos, the general word for a human being. The word for woman, gynḗ, means a woman or a wife. So the order runs between men and women, and some believers read it chiefly of husbands and wives, as in Ephesians 5:21–33, where the husband is head of the wife as Christ is head of the church, and is told to love her as Christ loved the church and gave himself for it.

Does headship make the man worth more than the woman?

Headship in this verse is an order of relationship between persons of equal worth, and the last clause of the verse shows it. The Son is fully God, equal with the Father, and still “the head of Christ is God”. If headship meant lesser worth, that clause would make the Son less than God, so the order Paul describes stands alongside full equality. Man and woman were both made in God’s image, “male and female created he them” (Genesis 1:27), and in Christ they stand together: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). Paul guards this himself in verses 11 and 12.

What does “the head of Christ is God” mean?

It means that the Son, who shares the Father’s divine nature, gladly does the Father’s will. Jesus said, “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do” (John 5:19), and “my Father is greater than I” (John 14:28). He humbled himself and “became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:5–8), and at the end the Son himself will be subject to the Father, “that God may be all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:28). This is the pattern for every headship beneath it. Christ leads his people by grace, self-giving love and humble service, so a man whose head is Christ learns from Christ what it is to lead.

Why a man prays uncovered and a woman covered

Paul applies the order to “every man praying or prophesying” and “every woman that prayeth or prophesieth” (verses 4 and 5). Proseúchomai means to pray to God, and prophēteúō means to speak by inspiration for the building up of the church. Both were done aloud in the assembly, and verse 5 takes for granted that women in Corinth were praying and prophesying there, as the men were.

A man who prays or prophesies “having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.” The Greek has no separate verb for “covered” here. It reads, word for word, “having down the head”, with the preposition katá, “down”, for something hanging down over the head like a veil. The verb kataischýnō means to shame or disgrace, to put to the blush. “His head” stands twice in the verse with two meanings. The first is the man’s own head, and the second, after verse 3, is Christ. A man who covers his head as he speaks to God or for God dishonours Christ, whose image and glory he bears (verse 7). Christ himself is “the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person” (Hebrews 1:3), the one who shows the Father openly.

The woman is the reverse. “Every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head.” Akatakályptos means unveiled, uncovered down. She shames her own head, and she shames her head in the sense of verse 3, the man. Paul adds, “that is even all one as if she were shaven.” Xyráō means to shave, with a razor. Among the Greeks and Romans a respectable woman, especially a married one, covered her head or wore her hair bound up in public, and appearing unveiled could mark her as immodest. A shaven head was a deep public disgrace, sometimes a punishment for adultery and sometimes a sign of mourning. For a woman to pray uncovered in the church was, Paul says, as shameful as that.

Verse 6 presses the comparison: “For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn.” Katakalýptō means to cover wholly, to veil. Keírō means to shear, to cut the hair short, and xyráō, to shave it off altogether. Paul says this as a challenge, and its answer follows: “but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.” The word for “shame”, aischrón, means a shameful or unseemly thing. Since everyone agrees that a shorn head disgraces a woman, she should be covered. Believers differ on what the covering was, a veil of cloth or hair bound up on the head, and both fit the words “covered” and “uncovered”.

Behind these verses lies Paul’s care for honour in God’s house and for the church’s witness. He has just told the Corinthians to do all to the glory of God and to keep from offending Jews, Greeks or the church of God (1 Corinthians 10:31–33), to take heed lest their liberty become a stumblingblock (1 Corinthians 8:9), and he does all things “for the gospel’s sake” (1 Corinthians 9:23). Elsewhere he urges believers to keep every stumblingblock out of a brother’s way (Romans 14:13) and asks women to adorn themselves “in modest apparel” and with good works (1 Timothy 2:9–10). He sums up the rule for worship later in this letter: “Let all things be done decently and in order” (1 Corinthians 14:40).

The reason from creation

Verse 7 gives the reason for the man’s uncovered head: “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God.” Gár, “for”, gives the reason for what came before. The verb opheílō means to owe, to be bound, and with ou, “not”, it says what the man is bound to keep from doing. Eikṓn, “image”, is a likeness or representation, and it takes us back to the day God made man in his own image. Dóxa, “glory”, means honour, splendour and dignity. The man shows God’s honour in the world, and to cover his head in worship would hide what God put there.

“But the woman is the glory of the man.” Genesis 1:27 says that God created both male and female in his image, so the woman bears God’s image as truly as the man. Here Paul speaks of glory in relation to the order of creation in Genesis 2. The woman was made from the man and for him, and so she is his honour. Paul is speaking of her origin and her place, and the worth of her person rests where his does, in God. The image of God is seen most fully in Christ, “the image of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15–17), and men and women in Christ are both being renewed in knowledge after the image of their Creator (Colossians 3:10).

Verses 8 and 9 explain why the woman is the glory of the man. “For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.” The preposition ek, “of”, means from or out of. Adam was formed by God from the dust of the ground, and Eve was formed from a rib taken out of Adam as he slept (Genesis 2:21–22). Paul argues from the same order of creation in 1 Timothy 2:11–14, where he writes, “For Adam was first formed, then Eve.”

“Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.” Ktízō means to create or to found, and it names God’s own act of making. The “for” is diá in the sense “for the sake of”. God made the woman because, as he said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” So “for the man” means for his good, as his helper and companion, in a partnership God designed. It gives no licence to treat her as less, and verses 11 and 12 follow at once to make that plain.

What is the power on her head, and why the angels?

The “power” on the woman’s head is a sign that she stands within the order God has set, and believers differ on exactly how. “For this cause” points back to verses 7 to 9. “Ought” is opheílō again, the same verb as in verse 7, so the woman is bound to this as the man is bound to his uncovered head. The word for “power”, exousía, means authority or right, and it can also mean plain power or ability.

  • A sign of authority. On this reading the “power” is the covering itself, called by the name of what it stands for. It shows that the woman accepts the headship of verse 3, and wearing it she prays and prophesies with dignity and honour within that order.
  • Her own authority. On this reading the exousía is the woman’s own right to pray and prophesy in the assembly, and she exercises it with her head covered, in a way that honours the order Paul has set out.

“Because of the angels” uses diá in the sense “because of”. Ángelos means a messenger, from a verb meaning to bring tidings, and in Scripture it names the spiritual beings who serve God, “ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation” (Hebrews 1:14). Paul leaves the reason unstated, and believers have given three answers. Some hold that angels watch the worship of the church and that its order shows them God’s wisdom, since God makes known his manifold wisdom to the principalities and powers in heavenly places by the church (Ephesians 3:10). Some hold that angels are present as guardians of holiness and order in worship, and that disorder offends them. Others hold that the angels themselves submit gladly to God’s authority, so that the church’s order matches theirs. On every reading the gathered church worships in the sight of heaven.

Man and woman need each other in the Lord

Verses 11 and 12 keep all that Paul has said about headship in its place. “Nevertheless” is plḗn, a word that brings in a qualification: “neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.” Chōrís means without, apart from, independent of. Man and woman belong to each other, and in the Lord, that is in Christ, each depends on the other. The God who said it was not good for the man to be alone made the two to complete each other. In Christ both are heirs of God (Romans 8:17) and members of the one body in which every member is needed (1 Corinthians 12:12–27).

“For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman.” The woman came out of (ek) the man at the beginning, and since then every man has come into the world through (diá) a woman, by being born. The Son of God himself was “made of a woman” (Galatians 4:4). “But all things of God” uses ek once more, the same preposition as “of the man”, and now it names the source of everything. Theós is the word for God. Every man and every woman, the order between them and the life they pass on, comes from him: “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things” (Romans 11:36). All things were made through the eternal Word (John 1:1–3), and by him all things consist.

These verses answer anyone who would take verses 8 and 9 as a ground for pride. The man came first and the woman was made for him, and still each owes life to the other and both owe everything to God.

What nature and long hair teach

In verse 13 Paul asks the Corinthians to weigh the matter themselves: “Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?” Krínō means to distinguish and decide, to come to a judgment. Prépō means to be fitting, suitable or becoming. Paul trusts them to see the answer, and the question expects them to say that it is unfitting, all the more when she is speaking to God. Scripture asks God’s people to think on whatever is honest, lovely and of good report (Philippians 4:8), and Peter praises the adorning of “a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price” (1 Peter 3:3–4).

Verse 14 asks a second question, and this one expects the answer yes: “Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?” Phýsis means growth, and so the natural make of a thing, its native disposition, and also settled usage. Didáskō means to teach, komáō to wear the hair long, and atimía means dishonour or disgrace. In the world of Corinth short hair was the respectable look for a man, and long hair on a man was thought dishonourable. Israel knew an honourable exception in the Nazirite, who let the locks of his hair grow as a sign of his vow to God (Numbers 6:5).

Believers differ on what “nature” means here. Some hold that it is the order God built into creation, which people can perceive, as Paul says the invisible things of God are clearly seen from the creation of the world (Romans 1:20) and speaks elsewhere of what is “against nature” (Romans 1:26–27). On this reading the distinction God made between men and women shows itself even in how they wear their hair. Others hold that “nature” here means the settled custom of Paul’s world, the sense of what is fitting that the Corinthians had grown up with, so that the lesson was true for them while its outward form belongs to that time and place.

Verse 15 completes the thought: “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.” “Glory” is dóxa, the same word as in verse 7, and long hair brings a woman honour and beauty. Her hair, kómē, is “given” (dídōmi), a gift from God. The “for” is antí, “instead of” or “in place of”, and the word for covering, peribólaion, means something thrown around a person, a mantle or wrap. It is a different word from katakalýptō, the verb for being “covered” in verse 6. God has given the woman a natural mantle, and the covering she wears when she prays agrees with what he has already given her.

No such custom in the churches of God

Paul ends with an appeal to the churches: “But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.” Dokéō means to think, suppose or seem, and here it describes anyone who is minded to argue. Philóneikos means fond of strife, quarrelsome. Hēmeîs, “we”, is emphatic and means Paul and those who stand with him. Synḗtheia is a custom, a settled practice. Ekklēsía means an assembly or congregation, and “the churches of God” are the congregations beyond Corinth.

Believers read “no such custom” in two ways. Some hold that the apostles and the churches have no custom of contention, so a quarrelsome spirit has no place among God’s people. Others hold that they have no custom of women praying uncovered, so the Corinthians who wanted it would stand apart from every other church. On either reading Paul settles the matter by setting the one congregation within the whole church of God.

Strife had already wounded Corinth (1 Corinthians 1:10–17), and God is the author of peace, “as in all churches of the saints” (1 Corinthians 14:33). Paul urges believers to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:1–3), to follow after the things which make for peace and build one another up (Romans 14:19), and to avoid foolish questions and contentions (Titus 3:9–11). Christ himself, of whom it was written, “He shall not strive, nor cry” (Matthew 12:19), prayed that his people would be one as he and the Father are one (John 17:20–23).

Should women cover their heads in worship today?

Believers differ on this question, and both answers come from a faithful reading of the passage.

  • A lasting command. Some believers hold that a woman should cover her head when she prays in public worship in every age. Paul grounds the covering in the headship of verse 3, in creation (verses 7 to 9) and in the angels (verse 10), and all of these are the same now as they were in Corinth.
  • A lasting truth in a sign of its time. Other believers hold that Paul applies an unchanging truth through a sign that carried its meaning in first-century Corinth. They point to the shame of an unveiled head in that society (verses 5 and 6), to what is “comely” (verse 13), to nature’s teaching (verse 14) and to the custom of the churches (verse 16). On this reading the covering itself belongs to that setting, and the truth it carried is kept today by modesty, good order and honour toward the order God has set. The same reading applies to verse 14, since in many places long hair on a man carries no shame.

Both hold to the order of verse 3, the equal worth and mutual need of verses 11 and 12, worship that honours God, and a peaceable spirit in the church.

Christ, the head who bore our shame

This passage speaks much of honour and shame, and Christ stands at the centre of both. He is the head of every man, and he honoured his own head perfectly. He did nothing of himself, sought his Father’s glory, and humbled himself to the cross. There he took the shame that was ours. He “endured the cross, despising the shame” (Hebrews 12:2), for “even Christ pleased not himself” (Romans 15:3). His headship is the headship of one who gave himself, and it can be trusted.

The passage also shows us a God of order and peace. He made man and woman distinct, made each for the other, and holds both in his hand, for “all things” are “of God”. When his people gather, they pray and prophesy in his presence and before his angels, and the way they come before him matters to him. Men and women who take their places in that order give honour to Christ, their head, who gave everything to honour the Father.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 11:1–16. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 16 verses
Passage under comment1 Corinthians 11:1–16
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Paul, having answered the cases put to him, proceeds in this chapter to the redress of grievances. The first verse of the chapter is put, by those who divided the epistle into chapters, as a preface to the rest of the epistle, but seems to have been a more proper close to the last, in which he had enforced the cautions he had given against the abuse of liberty, by his own example: Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1), fitly closes his argument; and the way of speaking in the next verse looks like a transition to another. But, whether it more properly belong to this or the last chapter, it is plain from it that Paul not only preached such doctrine as they ought to believe, but led such a life as they ought to imitate. "Be ye followers of me," that is, "Be imitators of me; live as you see me live." Note, Ministers are likely to preach most to the purpose when they can press their hearers to follow their example. Yet would not Paul be followed blindly neither. He encourages neither implicit faith nor obedience. He would be followed himself no further than he followed Christ. Christ's pattern is a copy without a blot; so is no man's else. Note, We should follow no leader further than he follows Christ. Apostles should be left by us when they deviate from the example of their Master. He passes next to reprehend and reform an indecency among them, of which the women were more especially guilty, concerning which observe,

I.How he prefaces it.

He begins with a commendation of what was praiseworthy in them (1 Corinthians 11:2): I praise you, that you remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances as I delivered them to you. Many of them, it is probable, did this in the strictest sense of the expression: and he takes occasion thence to address the body of the church under this good character; and the body might, in the main, have continued to observe the ordinances and institutions of Christ, though in some things they deviated fRom. and corrupted, them. Note, When we reprove what is amiss in any, it is very prudent and fit to commend what is good in them; it will show that the reproof is not from ill-will, and a humour of censuring and finding fault; and it will therefore procure the more regard to it.

II.How he lays the foundation for his reprehension by asserting the superiority of the man over the woman:

I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man, and the head of Christ is God. Christ, in his mediatorial character and glorified humanity, is at the head of mankind. He is not only first of the kind, but Lord and Sovereign. He has a name above every name: though in this high office and authority he has a superior, God being his head. And as God is the head of Christ, and Christ the head of the whole human kind, so the man is the head of the tow sexes: not indeed with such dominion as Christ has over the kind or God has over the man Christ Jesus; but a superiority and headship he has, and the woman should be in subjection and not assume or usurp the man's place. This is the situation in which God has placed her; and for that reason she should have a mind suited to her rank, and not do any thing that looks like an affectation of changing places. Something like this the women of the church of Corinth seem to have been guilty of, who were under inspiration, and prayed and prophesied even in their assemblies, 1 Corinthians 11:5. It is indeed an apostolical canon, that the women should keep silence in the churches (1 Corinthians 14:34; 1 Timothy 2:12), which some understand without limitation, as if a woman under inspiration also must keep silence, which seems very well to agree with the connection of the apostle's discourse, ch. 14. Others with a limitation: though a woman might not from her own abilities pretend to teach, or so much as question and debate any thing in the church yet when under inspiration the case was altered, she had liberty to speak. Or, though she might not preach even by inspiration (because teaching is the business of a superior), yet she might pray or utter hymns by inspiration, even in the public assembly. She did not show any affectation of superiority over the man by such acts of public worship. It is plain the apostle does not in this place prohibit the thing, but reprehend the manner of doing it. And yet he might utterly disallow the thing and lay an unlimited restraint on the woman in another part of the epistle. These things are not contradictory. It is to his present purpose to reprehend the manner wherein the women prayed and prophesied in the church, without determining in this place whether they did well or ill in praying or prophesying. Note, The manner of doing a thing enters into the morality of it. We must not only be concerned to do good, but that the good we do be well done.

III.The thing he reprehends is the woman's praying or prophesying uncovered, or the man's doing either covered, 1 Corinthians 11:4, 1 Corinthians 11:5.

To understand this, it must be observed that it was a signification either of shame or subjection for persons to be veiled, or covered, in the eastern countries, contrary to the custom of ours, where the being bare-headed betokens subjection, and being covered superiority and dominion. And this will help us the better to understand,

IV.The reasons on which he grounds his reprehension.

1.The man that prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonoureth his head, namely, Christ, the head of every man (1 Corinthians 11:3), by appearing in a habit unsuitable to the rank in which God has placed him. Note, We should, even in our dress and habits, avoid every thing that may dishonour Christ. The woman, on the other hand, who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head, namely, the man, 1 Corinthians 11:3. She appears in the dress of her superior, and throws off the token of her subjection. She might, with equal decency, cut her hair short, or cut it close, which was the custom of the man in that age. This would be in a manner to declare that she was desirous of changing sexes, a manifest affectation of that superiority which God had conferred on the other sex. And this was probably the fault of these prophetesses in the church of Corinth. It was doing a thing which, in that age of the world, betokened superiority, and therefore a tacit claim of what did not belong to them but the other sex. Note, The sexes should not affect to change places. The order in which divine wisdom has placed persons and things is best and fittest: to endeavour to amend it is to destroy all order, and introduce confusion. The woman should keep to the rank God has chosen for her, and not dishonour her head; for this, in the result, is to dishonour God. If she was made out of the man, and for the man, and made to be the glory of the man, she should do nothing, especially in public, that looks like a wish of having this order inverted.

2.Another reason against this conduct is that the man is the image and glory of God, the representative of that glorious dominion and headship which God has over the world. It is the man who is set at the head of this lower creation, and therein he bears the resemblance of God. The woman, on the other hand, is the glory of the man (1 Corinthians 11:7): she is his representative. Not but she has dominion over the inferior creatures, as she is a partaker of human nature, and so far is God's representative too, but it is at second-hand. She is the image of God, inasmuch as she is the image of the man: For the man was not made out of the woman, but the woman out of the man, 1 Corinthians 11:8. The man was first made, and made head of the creation here below, and therein the image of the divine dominion; and the woman was made out of the man, and shone with a reflection of his glory, being made superior to the other creatures here below, but in subjection to her husband, and deriving that honour from him out of whom she was made.

3.The woman was made for the man, to be his help-meet, and not the man for the woman. She was naturally, therefore, made subject to him, because made for him, for his use, and help, and comfort. And she who was intended to be always in subjection to the man should do nothing, in Christian assemblies, that looks like an affectation of equality.

4.She ought to have power on her head, because of the angels. Power, that is, a veil, the token, not of her having the power or superiority, but being under the power of her husband, subjected to him, and inferior to the other sex. Rebekah, when she met Isaac, and was delivering herself into his possession, put on her veil, in token of her subjection, Genesis 24:65. Thus would the apostle have the women appear In Christian assemblies, even though they spoke there by inspiration, because of the angels, that is, say some, because of the evil angels. The woman was first in the transgression, being deceived by the devil (1 Timothy 2:14), which increased her subjection to man, Genesis 3:16. Now, believe evil angels will be sure to mix in all Christian assemblies, therefore should women wear the token of their shamefacedness and subjection, which in that age and country, was a veil. Others say because of the good angels. Jews and Christians have had an opinion that these ministering spirits are many of them present in their assemblies. Their presence should restrain Christians from all indecencies in the worship of God. Note, We should learn from all to behave in the public assemblies of divine worship so as to express a reverence for God, and a content and satisfaction with that rank in which he has placed us.

V.He thinks fit to guard his argument with a caution lest the inference be carried too far (1 Corinthians 11:11, 1 Corinthians 11:12):

Nevertheless, neither is the man without the woman, nor the woman without the man in the Lord. They were made for one another. It is not good for him to be alone (Genesis 2:18), and therefore was a woman made, and made for the man; and the man was intended to be a comfort, and help, and defence, to the woman, though not so directly and immediately made for her. They were made to be a mutual comfort and blessing, not one a slave and the other a tyrant. Both were to be one flesh (Genesis 2:24), and this for the propagation of a race of mankind. They are reciprocal instruments of each other's production. As the woman was first formed out of the man, the man is ever since propagated by the woman (1 Corinthians 11:12), all by the divine wisdom and power of the First Cause so ordaining it. The authority and subjection should be no greater than are suitable to two in such near relation and close union to each other. Note, As it is the will of God that the woman know her place, so it is his will also that the man abuse not his power.

VI.He enforces his argument from the natural covering provided for the woman (1 Corinthians 11:13-15):

"Judge in yourselves - consult your own reason, hearken to what nature suggests - is it comely for a woman to pray to God uncovered? Should there not be a distinction kept up between the sexes in wearing their hair, since nature has made one? Is it not a distinction which nature has kept up among all civilized nations? The woman's hair is a natural covering; to wear it long is a glory to her; but for a man to have long hair, or cherish it, is a token of softness and effeminacy." Note, It should be our concern, especially in Christian and religious assemblies, to make no breach upon the rules of natural decency.

VII.He sums up all by referring those who were contentious to the usages and customs of the churches, 1 Corinthians 11:16.

Custom is in a great measure the rule of decency. And the common practice of the churches is what would have them govern themselves by. He does not silence the contentious by mere authority, but lets them know that they would appear to the world as very odd and singular in their humour if they would quarrel for a custom to which all the churches of Christ were at that time utter strangers, or against a custom in which they all concurred, and that upon the ground of natural decency. It was the common usage of the churches for women to appear in public assemblies, and join in public worship, veiled; and it was manifestly decent that they should do so. Those must be very contentious indeed who would quarrel with this, or lay it aside.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

5 quotes · AD 202–425
Ante-NicenePost-Nicene
200300400

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 202IrenaeusAnte-NiceneSourceAgainst Heresies Book III
We must conclude, moreover, that these men (the Montanists) can not admit the Apostle Paul either. For, in his Epistle to the Corinthians,
d. AD 220TertullianAnte-NiceneSourceOn Prayer
What is "every woman, but woman of every age, of every rank, of every condition? By saying" every" he excepts nought of womanhood, just as he excepts nought of manhood either from not being covered; for just so he says, "Every man." As, then, in the masculine sex, under the name of" man" even the" youth" is forbidden to be veiled; so, too, in the feminine, under the name of "woman," even the "virgin" is bidden to be veiled. Equally in each sex let the younger age follow the discipline of the elder; or else let the male "virgins," too, be veiled, if the female virgins withal are not veiled, because they are not mentioned by name. Let "man" and "youth" be different, if "woman" and "virgin" are different. For indeed it is "on account of the angels" that he saith women must be veiled, because on account of "the daughters of men" angels revolted from God.
Thus much in answer to the heretics: but we must also orderly go over the whole passage. For perhaps some one might here have doubt also, questioning with himself, what sort of a crime it was for the woman to be uncovered, or the man covered? What sort of crime it is, learn now from hence.

Symbols many and diverse have been given both to man and woman; to him of rule, to her of subjection: and among them this also, that she should be covered, while he hath his head bare. If now these be symbols, you see that both err when they disturb the proper order, and transgress the disposition of God, and their own proper limits, both the man falling into the woman's inferiority, and the woman rising up against the man by her outward habiliments.

For if exchange of garments be not lawful, so that neither she should be clad with a cloak, nor he with a mantle or a veil: ("for the woman," saith He, "shall not wear that which pertaineth to a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garments:") much more is it unseemly for these things to be interchanged. For the former indeed were ordained by men, even although God afterwards ratified them: but this by nature, I mean the being covered or uncovered. But when I say Nature, I mean God. For He it is Who created Nature. When therefore thou overturnest these boundaries, see how great injuries ensue.

And tell me not this, that the error is but small. For first, it is great even of itself: being as it is disobedience. Next, though it were small, it became great because of the greatness of the things whereof it is a sign. However, that it is a great matter, is evident from its ministering so effectually to good order among mankind, the governor and the governed being regularly kept in their several places by it.

So that he who transgresseth disturbs all things, and betrays the gifts of God, and casts to the ground the honor bestowed on him from above; not however the man only, but also the woman. For to her also it is the greatest of honors to preserve her own rank; as indeed of disgraces, the behavior of a rebel. Wherefore he laid it down concerning both, thus saying,

"Every man praying or prophesying having his head covered, dishonoreth his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled. dishonoreth her head."

For there were, as I said, both men who prophesied and women who had this gift at that time, as the daughters of Philip, as others before them and after them: concerning whom also the prophet spake of old: "your sons shall prophesy, and your daughters shall see visions."

Well then: the man he compelleth not to be always uncovered, but only when he prays. "For every man," saith he, "praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoreth his head." But the woman he commands to be at all times covered. Wherefore also having said, "Every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head unveiled, dishonoreth her head," he stayed not at this point only, but also proceeded to say, "for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven." But if to be shaven is always dishonorable, it is plain too that being uncovered is always a reproach. And not even with this only was he content, but added again, saying, "The woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels." He signifies that not at the time of prayer only but also continually, she ought to be covered. But with regard to the man, it is no longer about covering but about wearing long hair, that he so forms his discourse. To be covered he then only forbids, when a man is praying; but the wearing long hair he discourages at all times. Wherefore, as touching the woman, he said, "But if she be not veiled, let her also be shorn;" so likewise touching the man, "If he have long hair, it is a dishonor unto him." He said not, "if he be covered" but, "if he have long hair." Wherefore also he said at the beginning, "Every man praying or prophesying, having any thing on his head, dishonoreth his head." He said not, "covered," but "having any thing on his head;" signifying that even though he pray with the head bare, yet if he have long hair, he is like to one covered. "For the hair," saith he, "is given for a covering."
d. AD 418PelagiusPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 11
Paul was complaining because men were fussing about their hair and women were flaunting their locks in church. Not only was this dishonoring to them, but it was also an incitement to fornication.
d. AD 425Severian of GabalaPost-NiceneSourcePAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
There is a difference between ancient and recent prophets, as follows. The ancients prophesied about the redemption of Israel, the calling of the Gentiles and the incarnation of Christ, whereas recent prophets prophesy about particular things or people, as Peter prophesied about Ananias, for example..
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 11:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8