Skip to content
“Headship and Distinctions in Worship”· 1 Corinthians 11:3–16
Translation
King James Version
But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
But G1161 every G3956 woman G1135 that prayeth G4336 or G2228 prophesieth G4395 with her head G2776 uncovered G177 dishonoureth G2617 her G1438 head G2776: for G1063 that is G2076 even G2532 all one G1520 as if G846 she were shaven G3587.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
but every woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled brings shame to her head — there is no difference between her and a woman who has had her head shaved.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, for it is just as if her head were shaved.
Ask
American Standard Version
But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonoreth her head; for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonors her head. For it is one and the same thing as if she were shaved.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But euery woman that prayeth or prophecieth bare headed, dishonoureth her head: for it is euen one very thing, as though she were shauen.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and every woman praying or prophesying with the head uncovered, doth dishonour her own head, for it is one and the same thing with her being shaven,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 28,606 of 31,102 · 92.0%

Study This Verse

Summary

1 Corinthians 11:5 is a pivotal verse within Paul's instructions to the Corinthian church concerning appropriate conduct and appearance during public worship. It specifically addresses the practice of women praying or prophesying without a head covering, asserting that such an action dishonors her "head," a term carrying both physical and metaphorical significance, and equates this perceived dishonor to the extreme cultural shame associated with a shaven head.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is embedded within Paul's broader discourse in 1 Corinthians 11, where he addresses issues of order and decorum in the Corinthian church's public assemblies. Paul begins the chapter by establishing a divine hierarchy of headship—God as the head of Christ, Christ as the head of man, and man as the head of woman (1 Corinthians 11:3). Following this foundational principle, he immediately transitions to the practical implications for men and women's appearance during prayer and prophecy, with 1 Corinthians 11:5 specifically focusing on women. This section precedes his detailed instructions regarding the proper observance of the Lord's Supper, indicating a sustained emphasis on respectful and orderly worship practices.

Historical & Cultural Context

Ancient Corinth was a bustling, cosmopolitan Roman city, a melting pot of diverse cultures and religious practices. In Greco-Roman society, a woman's public appearance, particularly her head covering, was deeply intertwined with her social status, honor, and respectability. For a respectable woman, especially a married one, appearing unveiled in public could be seen as a sign of immodesty, a lack of self-control, or even an indication of prostitution or adultery. Conversely, a shaven head was a severe mark of public disgrace, often imposed as a punishment for adultery or as a sign of deep mourning, signifying extreme shame and dishonor. Paul's instructions, therefore, must be understood within this specific cultural framework, where visual symbols carried immense social weight and could easily lead to misinterpretation or scandal.

Key Themes

The passage in 1 Corinthians 11 and specifically 1 Corinthians 11:5 contributes to several overarching themes in the broader book. A primary theme is Honor and Shame, a pervasive cultural value in the ancient world, where maintaining one's honor and avoiding public shame was paramount. Paul's assertion that an uncovered head "dishonoureth her head" directly invokes this concept, implying a breach of culturally understood decorum that would bring shame upon the woman and potentially the Christian community. Another crucial theme is Order and Decorum in Worship, which Paul consistently emphasizes throughout his letters, particularly in 1 Corinthians 14, where he calls for all things to be done "decently and in order" (1 Corinthians 14:40). This instruction ensures that Christian worship reflects God's character and does not cause confusion or scandal. Finally, the verse touches upon Cultural Sensitivity and Witness, highlighting how the church's practices should be mindful of the surrounding culture to avoid bringing disrepute to the gospel message or creating unnecessary stumbling blocks for believers and non-believers alike.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

kephalḗ kephalē' G2776

This word, translated as "head," is central to the verse's meaning and Paul's broader argument in 1 Corinthians 11. It refers not only to the literal physical head but also carries a metaphorical sense of source, origin, or authority. In this verse, "uncovered" refers to the physical head, while "dishonoureth her head" likely plays on both meanings: dishonoring her physical appearance/honor and potentially dishonoring her "head" in the sense of her husband or the male figure in the divine order established in 1 Corinthians 11:3.

akatakályptos akatakályptos' G177

Translated as "uncovered," this word literally means "unveiled" or "not covered down." It describes the state of a woman's head lacking the customary covering or veil during public prayer or prophecy. The absence of this covering was culturally significant in Corinth, signaling a departure from accepted norms of modesty and respectability.

kataischýnō kataischýnō' G2617

This verb, rendered "dishonoureth," means "to shame down, disgrace, or put to the blush." It conveys the severe negative consequence of the woman's action. The use of this strong term underscores the profound cultural offense and social disgrace that an uncovered head would represent, equating it to the ultimate public shame of having one's head shaven.

Verse Breakdown

"But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth"

This clause identifies the specific subjects of the instruction – Christian women – and the particular activities in which they are engaged: public prayer and prophecy. This indicates that women were indeed participating audibly and actively in the spiritual life of the Corinthian church's assemblies.

"with [her] head uncovered"

This specifies the problematic action. The "uncovered" state refers to the absence of the customary head covering or veil that was a symbol of modesty and respectability for women in Greco-Roman society, particularly when in public or engaging in formal activities.

"dishonoureth her head"

This states the immediate consequence of the action. The dishonor applies both to the woman's physical head (making her appear immodest or disrespectful) and, by extension, to her "head" in the metaphorical sense, which could refer to her husband, the man, or even the divine order of headship established by Paul earlier in the chapter. It implies a public shaming.

"for that is even all one as if she were shaven"

This powerful comparison highlights the severity of the dishonor. In the cultural context of Corinth, a shaven head was a universally recognized mark of extreme disgrace, often imposed on women as punishment for grave offenses like adultery or prostitution. By equating an uncovered head with a shaven head, Paul emphasizes the profound cultural offense and the depth of shame it would bring upon the woman and the Christian community's witness.

Literary Devices

Paul employs several Literary Devices to convey his message with force and clarity. The most prominent is Simile, evident in the phrase "as if she were shaven." This direct comparison vividly illustrates the severity of the dishonor, drawing on a culturally understood symbol of extreme shame to underscore the gravity of appearing unveiled in public worship. Furthermore, Paul utilizes Metonymy or Synecdoche in his repeated use of "head" (kephalē). While initially referring to the physical head that is uncovered, the term quickly expands to represent the woman's honor, her social standing, and even the established divine order of authority (her "head" being man, and ultimately Christ). This dual meaning allows Paul to weave together physical appearance with theological principles. The overall argument also relies on Rhetorical Analogy, where Paul draws parallels between the cultural implications of appearance and the spiritual principles of order and honor, urging the Corinthians to consider how their actions reflect on God and the gospel in their specific context.

Theological and Thematic Connections

The instruction in 1 Corinthians 11:5, while culturally specific in its manifestation, is deeply rooted in timeless theological principles concerning order, honor, and the church's witness. It underscores the importance of conducting ourselves in ways that reflect God's design for creation and redemption, avoiding actions that would bring disrepute to the gospel or cause unnecessary offense within a given cultural context. The underlying call is for believers to live and worship in a manner that prioritizes the glory of God, the edification of the body, and the effective proclamation of Christ to a watching world. While the specific form of head coverings may not be universally applied today, the principle of thoughtful decorum and sensitivity to cultural perceptions for the sake of the gospel remains profoundly relevant.

Reflection and Application

1 Corinthians 11:5 presents a fascinating challenge for modern believers: how do we faithfully apply ancient, culturally specific instructions to our contemporary lives? The key lies in discerning the timeless, underlying principles that transcend the particular cultural forms. This verse invites us to reflect on how our actions, appearance, and conduct in corporate worship and public life contribute to or detract from the honor of God and the effective witness of the gospel. It prompts us to consider what "decorum" looks like in our own cultural context, ensuring that our practices do not inadvertently cause scandal, confusion, or division, but rather foster an atmosphere of reverence, unity, and respect. Ultimately, the passage calls for a thoughtful and humble engagement with our cultural surroundings, always seeking to honor God and build up the body of Christ, even if it means adjusting our preferences for the sake of a greater good.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do we discern timeless biblical principles from their specific cultural expressions, as exemplified in 1 Corinthians 11:5?
  2. What are contemporary "cultural coverings" or forms of decorum that communicate respect for God, others, and the sanctity of worship in our specific contexts?
  3. In what ways might our appearance or behavior in public worship inadvertently hinder the gospel message or cause disunity within our community today?

FAQ

Does 1 Corinthians 11:5 mandate head coverings for women in all churches today?

This verse is one of the most debated passages in the New Testament regarding its contemporary application. While some Christian traditions interpret it as a timeless command for women to wear head coverings in worship, many scholars and traditions view the specific instruction regarding head coverings as culturally conditioned. Paul's reasoning heavily relies on the cultural understanding of honor and shame in first-century Corinth, where an uncovered head was a public sign of disrespect or immodesty, akin to having one's head shaven. The underlying principles of the passage—maintaining order, avoiding scandal, honoring God, and respecting the cultural context for the sake of the gospel—are timeless. Therefore, many churches today focus on applying these principles by encouraging modesty, decorum, and actions that do not cause offense or confusion within their own cultural settings, rather than enforcing a literal head covering.

What does Paul mean by "dishonoureth her head" in this verse?

The phrase "dishonoureth her head" carries a rich double meaning, playing on the Greek word kephalē (head). Firstly, it refers to the woman's physical head; by appearing uncovered, she dishonors her own person in a way that was culturally perceived as shameful or immodest in Corinth. Secondly, and more profoundly, it refers to her "head" in the metaphorical sense, which, according to Paul's preceding argument in 1 Corinthians 11:3, is man (and ultimately Christ). Thus, appearing uncovered could be seen as a dishonor to the established divine order of headship, or to her husband, or even to the community's reputation. The comparison to a shaven head emphasizes the depth of this dishonor, as a shaven head was a public mark of extreme disgrace in that society.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

While 1 Corinthians 11:5 addresses a specific cultural practice, its underlying principles find their ultimate fulfillment and illumination in Christ. Jesus Christ is the perfect embodiment of divine order and submission, demonstrating complete obedience to God the Father, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:5-8). He is the true "head" of all creation and, more specifically, the head of the church, His body (Ephesians 1:22; Colossians 1:18). Therefore, the call for order, honor, and decorum in worship, as seen in this verse, ultimately points to the church's identity as the bride of Christ, called to reflect His glory and character in all things. Our actions in worship, including our appearance, should always be aimed at honoring Him and building up His body, ensuring that nothing detracts from the purity of the gospel message or brings disrepute to His holy name. The emphasis on avoiding "dishonor" in the Corinthian context can be seen as a shadow of the ultimate honor we are called to bring to Christ, who has covered us with His righteousness (Isaiah 61:10) and calls us to live in a manner worthy of His calling (Ephesians 4:1).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 11 verses 1–16

Paul, having answered the cases put to him, proceeds in this chapter to the redress of grievances. The first verse of the chapter is put, by those who divided the epistle into chapters, as a preface to the rest of the epistle, but seems to have been a more proper close to the last, in which he had enforced the cautions he had given against the abuse of liberty, by his own example: Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ (Co1 11:1), fitly closes his argument; and the way of speaking in the next verse looks like a transition to another. But, whether it more properly belong to this or the last chapter, it is plain from it that Paul not only preached such doctrine as they ought to believe, but led such a life as they ought to imitate. "Be ye followers of me," that is, "Be imitators of me; live as you see me live." Note, Ministers are likely to preach most to the purpose when they can press their hearers to follow their example. Yet would not Paul be followed blindly neither. He encourages neither implicit faith nor obedience. He would be followed himself no further than he followed Christ. Christ's pattern is a copy without a blot; so is no man's else. Note, We should follow no leader further than he follows Christ. Apostles should be left by us when they deviate from the example of their Master. He passes next to reprehend and reform an indecency among them, of which the women were more especially guilty, concerning which observe,

I. How he prefaces it. He begins with a commendation of what was praiseworthy in them (Co1 11:2): I praise you, that you remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances as I delivered them to you. Many of them, it is probable, did this in the strictest sense of the expression: and he takes occasion thence to address the body of the church under this good character; and the body might, in the main, have continued to observe the ordinances and institutions of Christ, though in some things they deviated fRom. and corrupted, them. Note, When we reprove what is amiss in any, it is very prudent and fit to commend what is good in them; it will show that the reproof is not from ill-will, and a humour of censuring and finding fault; and it will therefore procure the more regard to it.

II. How he lays the foundation for his reprehension by asserting the superiority of the man over the woman: I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man, and the head of Christ is God. Christ, in his mediatorial character and glorified humanity, is at the head of mankind. He is not only first of the kind, but Lord and Sovereign. He has a name above every name: though in this high office and authority he has a superior, God being his head. And as God is the head of Christ, and Christ the head of the whole human kind, so the man is the head of the tow sexes: not indeed with such dominion as Christ has over the kind or God has over the man Christ Jesus; but a superiority and headship he has, and the woman should be in subjection and not assume or usurp the man's place. This is the situation in which God has placed her; and for that reason she should have a mind suited to her rank, and not do any thing that looks like an affectation of changing places. Something like this the women of the church of Corinth seem to have been guilty of, who were under inspiration, and prayed and prophesied even in their assemblies, Co1 11:5. It is indeed an apostolical canon, that the women should keep silence in the churches (Co1 14:34; Ti1 2:12), which some understand without limitation, as if a woman under inspiration also must keep silence, which seems very well to agree with the connection of the apostle's discourse, ch. 14. Others with a limitation: though a woman might not from her own abilities pretend to teach, or so much as question and debate any thing in the church yet when under inspiration the case was altered, she had liberty to speak. Or, though she might not preach even by inspiration (because teaching is the business of a superior), yet she might pray or utter hymns by inspiration, even in the public assembly. She did not show any affectation of superiority over the man by such acts of public worship. It is plain the apostle does not in this place prohibit the thing, but reprehend the manner of doing it. And yet he might utterly disallow the thing and lay an unlimited restraint on the woman in another part of the epistle. These things are not contradictory. It is to his present purpose to reprehend the manner wherein the women prayed and prophesied in the church, without determining in this place whether they did well or ill in praying or prophesying. Note, The manner of doing a thing enters into the morality of it. We must not only be concerned to do good, but that the good we do be well done.

III. The thing he reprehends is the woman's praying or prophesying uncovered, or the man's doing either covered, Co1 11:4, Co1 11:5. To understand this, it must be observed that it was a signification either of shame or subjection for persons to be veiled, or covered, in the eastern countries, contrary to the custom of ours, where the being bare-headed betokens subjection, and being covered superiority and dominion. And this will help us the better to understand,

IV. The reasons on which he grounds his reprehension. 1. The man that prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonoureth his head, namely, Christ, the head of every man (Co1 11:3), by appearing in a habit unsuitable to the rank in which God has placed him. Note, We should, even in our dress and habits, avoid every thing that may dishonour Christ. The woman, on the other hand, who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head, namely, the man, Co1 11:3. She appears in the dress of her superior, and throws off the token of her subjection. She might, with equal decency, cut her hair short, or cut it close, which was the custom of the man in that age. This would be in a manner to declare that she was desirous of changing sexes, a manifest affectation of that superiority which God had conferred on the other sex. And this was probably the fault of these prophetesses in the church of Corinth. It was doing a thing which, in that age of the world, betokened superiority, and therefore a tacit claim of what did not belong to them but the other sex. Note, The sexes should not affect to change places. The order in which divine wisdom has placed persons and things is best and fittest: to endeavour to amend it is to destroy all order, and introduce confusion. The woman should keep to the rank God has chosen for her, and not dishonour her head; for this, in the result, is to dishonour God. If she was made out of the man, and for the man, and made to be the glory of the man, she should do nothing, especially in public, that looks like a wish of having this order inverted. 2. Another reason against this conduct is that the man is the image and glory of God, the representative of that glorious dominion and headship which God has over the world. It is the man who is set at the head of this lower creation, and therein he bears the resemblance of God. The woman, on the other hand, is the glory of the man (Co1 11:7): she is his representative. Not but she has dominion over the inferior creatures, as she is a partaker of human nature, and so far is God's representative too, but it is at second-hand. She is the image of God, inasmuch as she is the image of the man: For the man was not made out of the woman, but the woman out of the man, Co1 11:8. The man was first made, and made head of the creation here below, and therein the image of the divine dominion; and the woman was made out of the man, and shone with a reflection of his glory, being made superior to the other creatures here below, but in subjection to her husband, and deriving that honour from him out of whom she was made. 3. The woman was made for the man, to be his help-meet, and not the man for the woman. She was naturally, therefore, made subject to him, because made for him, for his use, and help, and comfort. And she who was intended to be always in subjection to the man should do nothing, in Christian assemblies, that looks like an affectation of equality. 4. She ought to have power on her head, because of the angels. Power, that is, a veil, the token, not of her having the power or superiority, but being under the power of her husband, subjected to him, and inferior to the other sex. Rebekah, when she met Isaac, and was delivering herself into his possession, put on her veil, in token of her subjection, Gen 24:65. Thus would the apostle have the women appear In Christian assemblies, even though they spoke there by inspiration, because of the angels, that is, say some, because of the evil angels. The woman was first in the transgression, being deceived by the devil (Ti1 2:14), which increased her subjection to man, Gen 3:16. Now, believe evil angels will be sure to mix in all Christian assemblies, therefore should women wear the token of their shamefacedness and subjection, which in that age and country, was a veil. Others say because of the good angels. Jews and Christians have had an opinion that these ministering spirits are many of them present in their assemblies. Their presence should restrain Christians from all indecencies in the worship of God. Note, We should learn from all to behave in the public assemblies of divine worship so as to express a reverence for God, and a content and satisfaction with that rank in which he has placed us.

V. He thinks fit to guard his argument with a caution lest the inference be carried too far (Co1 11:11, Co1 11:12): Nevertheless, neither is the man without the woman, nor the woman without the man in the Lord. They were made for one another. It is not good for him to be alone (Gen 2:18), and therefore was a woman made, and made for the man; and the man was intended to be a comfort, and help, and defence, to the woman, though not so directly and immediately made for her. They were made to be a mutual comfort and blessing, not one a slave and the other a tyrant. Both were to be one flesh (Gen 2:24), and this for the propagation of a race of mankind. They are reciprocal instruments of each other's production. As the woman was first formed out of the man, the man is ever since propagated by the woman (Co1 11:12), all by the divine wisdom and power of the First Cause so ordaining it. The authority and subjection should be no greater than are suitable to two in such near relation and close union to each other. Note, As it is the will of God that the woman know her place, so it is his will also that the man abuse not his power.

VI. He enforces his argument from the natural covering provided for the woman (Co1 11:13-15): "Judge in yourselves - consult your own reason, hearken to what nature suggests - is it comely for a woman to pray to God uncovered? Should there not be a distinction kept up between the sexes in wearing their hair, since nature has made one? Is it not a distinction which nature has kept up among all civilized nations? The woman's hair is a natural covering; to wear it long is a glory to her; but for a man to have long hair, or cherish it, is a token of softness and effeminacy." Note, It should be our concern, especially in Christian and religious assemblies, to make no breach upon the rules of natural decency.

VII. He sums up all by referring those who were contentious to the usages and customs of the churches, Co1 11:16. Custom is in a great measure the rule of decency. And the common practice of the churches is what would have them govern themselves by. He does not silence the contentious by mere authority, but lets them know that they would appear to the world as very odd and singular in their humour if they would quarrel for a custom to which all the churches of Christ were at that time utter strangers, or against a custom in which they all concurred, and that upon the ground of natural decency. It was the common usage of the churches for women to appear in public assemblies, and join in public worship, veiled; and it was manifestly decent that they should do so. Those must be very contentious indeed who would quarrel with this, or lay it aside.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–16. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215Ante-Nicene
And she will never fall, who puts before her eyes modesty, and her shawl; nor will she invite another to fall into sin by uncovering her face. For this is the wish of the Word, since it is becoming for her to pray veiled.
TertullianAD 220Ante-Nicene
In precisely the same manner, when enjoining on women silence in the church, that they speak not for the mere sake of learning (although that even they have the right of prophesying, he has already shown when he covers the woman that prophesies with a veil), he goes to the law for his sanction that woman should be under obedience.
TertullianAD 220Ante-Nicene
For they who allow to virgins immunity from head-covering, appear to rest on this; that the apostle has not defined "virgins" by name, but "women," as "to be veiled; "nor the sex generally, so as to say "females," but a class of the sex, by saying "women: "for if he had named the sex by saying "females," he would have made his limit absolute for every woman; but while he names one class of the sex, he separates another class by being silent.
TertullianAD 220Ante-Nicene
But, withal, the declaration is plain: "Every woman," saith he, "praying and prophesying with head uncovered, dishonoureth her own head." What is "every woman, but woman of every age, of every rank, of every condition? By saying" every" he excepts nought of womanhood, just as he excepts nought of manhood either from not being covered; for just so he says, "Every man.
TertullianAD 220Ante-Nicene
What is the meaning of the expression “every woman” except women of every age, every rank and every circumstance? No one is excepted.
Victorinus of PettauAD 304Ante-Nicene
"Seven thunders uttered their voices." The seven thunders uttering their voices signify, the Holy Spirit of sevenfold power, who through the prophets announced all things to come, and by His voice John gave his testimony in the world; but because he says that he was about to write the things which the thunders had uttered, that is, whatever things had been obscure in the announcements of the Old Testament; he is forbidden to write them, but he was charged to leave them sealed, because he is an apostle, nor was it fitting that the grace of the subsequent stage should be given in the first. "The time," says he, "is at hand." For the apostles, by powers, by signs, by portents, and by mighty works, have overcome unbelief. After them there is now given to the same completed Churches the comfort of having the prophetic Scriptures subsequently interpreted, for I said that after the apostles there would be interpreting prophets.

For the apostle says: "And he placed in the Church indeed, first, apostles; secondly, prophets; thirdly, teachers," and the rest. And in another place he says: "Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the others judge." And he says: "Every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered, dishonoureth her head" And when he says, "Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the others judge," he is not speaking in respect of the Catholic prophecy of things unheard and unknown, but of things both announced and known. But let them judge whether or not the interpretation is consistent with the testimonies of the prophetic utterance. It is plain, therefore, that to John, armed as he was with superior virtue, this was not necessary, although the body of Christ, which is the Church, adorned with His members, ought to respond to its position.
John ChrysostomAD 407Post-Nicene
Thus much in answer to the heretics: but we must also orderly go over the whole passage. For perhaps some one might here have doubt also, questioning with himself, what sort of a crime it was for the woman to be uncovered, or the man covered? What sort of crime it is, learn now from hence.

Symbols many and diverse have been given both to man and woman; to him of rule, to her of subjection: and among them this also, that she should be covered, while he hath his head bare. If now these be symbols, you see that both err when they disturb the proper order, and transgress the disposition of God, and their own proper limits, both the man falling into the woman's inferiority, and the woman rising up against the man by her outward habiliments.

For if exchange of garments be not lawful, so that neither she should be clad with a cloak, nor he with a mantle or a veil: ("for the woman," saith He, "shall not wear that which pertaineth to a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garments:") much more is it unseemly for these things to be interchanged. For the former indeed were ordained by men, even although God afterwards ratified them: but this by nature, I mean the being covered or uncovered. But when I say Nature, I mean God. For He it is Who created Nature. When therefore thou overturnest these boundaries, see how great injuries ensue.

And tell me not this, that the error is but small. For first, it is great even of itself: being as it is disobedience. Next, though it were small, it became great because of the greatness of the things whereof it is a sign. However, that it is a great matter, is evident from its ministering so effectually to good order among mankind, the governor and the governed being regularly kept in their several places by it.

So that he who transgresseth disturbs all things, and betrays the gifts of God, and casts to the ground the honor bestowed on him from above; not however the man only, but also the woman. For to her also it is the greatest of honors to preserve her own rank; as indeed of disgraces, the behavior of a rebel. Wherefore he laid it down concerning both, thus saying,

"Every man praying or prophesying having his head covered, dishonoreth his head. But every woman praying or prophesying with her head unveiled. dishonoreth her head."

For there were, as I said, both men who prophesied and women who had this gift at that time, as the daughters of Philip, as others before them and after them: concerning whom also the prophet spake of old: "your sons shall prophesy, and your daughters shall see visions."

Well then: the man he compelleth not to be always uncovered, but only when he prays. "For every man," saith he, "praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoreth his head." But the woman he commands to be at all times covered. Wherefore also having said, "Every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head unveiled, dishonoreth her head," he stayed not at this point only, but also proceeded to say, "for it is one and the same thing as if she were shaven." But if to be shaven is always dishonorable, it is plain too that being uncovered is always a reproach. And not even with this only was he content, but added again, saying, "The woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head, because of the angels." He signifies that not at the time of prayer only but also continually, she ought to be covered. But with regard to the man, it is no longer about covering but about wearing long hair, that he so forms his discourse. To be covered he then only forbids, when a man is praying; but the wearing long hair he discourages at all times. Wherefore, as touching the woman, he said, "But if she be not veiled, let her also be shorn;" so likewise touching the man, "If he have long hair, it is a dishonor unto him." He said not, "if he be covered" but, "if he have long hair." Wherefore also he said at the beginning, "Every man praying or prophesying, having any thing on his head, dishonoreth his head." He said not, "covered," but "having any thing on his head;" signifying that even though he pray with the head bare, yet if he have long hair, he is like to one covered. "For the hair," saith he, "is given for a covering."
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Corinthians 11:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.