See on the biblical-era map


Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Corinthians 11 verses 17–22
In this passage the apostle sharply rebukes them for much greater disorders than the former, in their partaking of the Lord's supper, which was commonly done in the first ages, as the ancients tell us, with a love-feast annexed, which gave occasion to the scandalous disorders which the apostle here reprehends, concerning which observe,
I. The manner in which he introduces his charge: "Now in this that I declare to you I praise you not, Co1 11:17. I cannot commend, but must blame and condemn you." It is plain, from the beginning of the chapter, that he was willing and pleased to commend as far as he could. But such scandalous disorders, in so sacred an institution, as they were guilty of, called for a sharp reprehension. They quite turned the institution against itself. It was intended to make them better, to promote their spiritual interests; but it really made them worse. They came together, not for the better, but for the worse. Note, The ordinances of Christ, if they do not make us better, will be very apt to make us worse; if they do not do our souls good, they do us harm; if they do not melt and mend, they will harden. Corruptions will be confirmed in us, if the proper means do not work a cure of them.
II. He enters upon his charge against them in more particulars than one. 1. He tells them that, upon coming together, they fell into divisions, schisms - schismata. Instead of concurring unanimously in celebrating the ordinance, they fell a quarrelling with one another. Note, There may be schism where there is no separation of communion. Persons may come together in the same church, and sit down at the same table of the Lord, and yet be schismatics. Uncharitableness, alienation of affection, especially if it grows up to discord, and feuds, and contentions, constitute schism. Christians may separate from each other's communion, and yet be uncharitable one towards another; they may continue in the same communion, and yet be uncharitable. This latter is schism, rather than the former. The apostle had heard a report of the Corinthians' divisions, and he tells them he had too much reason to believe it. For, adds he, there must be heresies also; not only quarrels, but factions, and perhaps such corrupt opinions as strike at the foundation of Christianity, and all sound religion. Note, No marvel there should be breaches of Christian love in the churches, when such offences will come as shall make shipwreck of faith and a good conscience. Such offences must come. Note that men are necessitated to be guilty of them; but the event is certain, and God permits them, that those who are approved (such honest hearts as will bear the trial) may be set to view, and appear faithful by their constant adherence to the truths and ways of God, notwithstanding the temptations of seducers. Note, The wisdom of God can make the wickedness and errors of others a foil to the piety and integrity of the saints. 2. He charges them not only with discord and division, but with scandalous disorder: For in eating every one taketh before the other his own supper; and one is hungry, and another is drunken, Co1 11:21. Heathens used to drink plentifully at their feasts upon their sacrifices. Many of the wealthier Corinthians seem to have taken the same liberty at the Lord's table, or at least at their Agapai, or love-feasts, that were annexed to the supper. They would not stay for one another; the rich despised the poor, and ate and drank up the provisions they themselves brought, before the poor were allowed to partake; and thus some wanted, while others had more than enough. This was profaning a sacred institution, and corrupting a divine ordinance, to the last degree. What was appointed to feed the soul was employed to feed their lusts and passions. What should have been a bond of mutual amity and affection was made an instrument of discord and disunion. The poor were deprived of the food prepared for them, and the rich turned a feast of charity into a debauch. This was scandalous irregularity.
III. The apostle lays the blame of this conduct closely on them, 1. By telling them that their conduct perfectly destroyed the purpose and use of such an institution: This is not to eat the Lord's supper, Co1 11:20. It was coming to the Lord's table, and not coming. They might as well have staid away. Thus to eat the outward elements was not to eat Christ's body. Note, There is a careless and irregular eating of the Lord's supper which is as none at all; it will turn to no account, but to increase guilt. Such an eating was that of the Corinthians; their practices were a direct contradiction to the purposes of this sacred institution. 2. Their conduct carried in it a contempt of God's house, or of the church, Co1 11:22. If they had a mind to feast, they might do it at home in their own houses; but to come to the Lord's table, and cabal and quarrel, and keep the poor from their share of the provision there made for them as well as rich, was such an abuse of the ordinance, and such a contempt of the poorer members of the church more especially, as merited a very sharp rebuke. Such a behaviour tended much to the shame and discouragement of the poor, whose souls were as dear to Christ, and cost him as much, as those of the rich. Note, Common meals may be managed after a common manner, but religious feasts should be attended religiously. Note, also, It is a heinous evil, and severely to be censured, for Christians to treat their fellow-christians with contempt and insolence, but especially at the Lord's table. This is doing what they can to pour contempt on divine ordinances. And we should look carefully to it that nothing in our behaviour at the Lord's table have the appearance of contemning so sacred an institution.
For he shows us that it was owing to the prospect of the greater evil that he readily believed the existence of the lighter ones; and so far indeed was he from believing, in respect of evils (of such a kind), that heresies were good, that his object was to forewarn us that we ought not to be surprised at temptations of even a worse stamp, since (he said) they tended "to make manifest all such as were approved; " in other words, those whom they were unable to pervert.
If, however, the angels of the rival god are referred to, what fear is there for them? for not even Marcion's disciples, (to say nothing of his angels, ) have any desire for women. We have often shown before now, that the apostle classes heresies as evil among "works of the flesh," and that he would have those persons accounted estimable who shun heresies as an evil thing.
These were the ingenious arts of "spiritual wickednesses," wherewith we also, my brethren, may fairly expect to have "to wrestle," as necessary for faith, that the elect may be made manifest, (and) that the reprobate may be discovered.
"For first of all, when ye come together in the Church, I hear that divisions exist among you."
And he saith not, "For fear that you do not sup together in common;" "for I hear that you feast in private, and not with the poor:" but what was most calculated thoroughly to shake their minds, that he set down, the name of division, which was the cause of this mischief also: and so he reminded them again of that which was said in the beginning of the Epistle, and was "signified by them of the house of Chloe."
"And I partly believe it."
Thus, lest they should say, "But what if the accusers speak falsely?" he neither saith, "I believe it," lest he should rather make them reckless; nor again, on the other hand, "I disbelieve it," lest he should seem to reprove without cause, but, "I partly believe it," saith he, i.e., "I believe it in a small part;" making them anxious and inviting them to return to correction.
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 11:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
In 1 Corinthians 11:18, the Apostle Paul initiates his direct confrontation of the severe disunity plaguing the Corinthian church, specifically as it manifested during their communal gatherings for worship and the Lord's Supper. He reveals that credible reports have reached him concerning the presence of "divisions" among them, a reality he finds partly believable given the Corinthians' demonstrated propensity for factionalism. This verse serves as a crucial pivot, setting the stage for Paul's detailed instructions on proper conduct, reverence, and the profound theological significance of the Eucharist, all aimed at restoring unity and order within the fractured assembly.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Paul employs several rhetorical strategies in this verse. The phrase "For first of all" serves as a marker of emphasis, signaling the paramount importance of the issue he is about to discuss. His declaration, "I hear that there be divisions among you," functions as a direct confrontation, immediately laying bare the painful truth he has received. The subsequent "and I partly believe it" acts as an understatement or litotes, subtly reinforcing the reality of the divisions. By stating he "partly" believes it, Paul implies that the evidence is compelling, and the situation is indeed dire, perhaps even worse than he fully acknowledges, thereby lending credibility to his subsequent rebuke. The very word "divisions" (σχίσματα) itself is a metaphor, drawing on the imagery of a "tear" or "rent" in fabric, vividly portraying the destructive impact of disunity on the cohesive body of Christ.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The presence of divisions within the Corinthian church, particularly during their sacred assemblies, stands in stark opposition to the very nature of the church as the unified body of Christ. Theologically, the church is called to reflect the unity of the Godhead and to be a visible testament to the reconciling power of the Gospel. Divisions not only hinder the church's witness to the world but also undermine its internal health, spiritual growth, and ability to minister effectively. Paul's strong condemnation here sets the stage for his profound teaching on the Lord's Supper as a meal of unity, not division, and underscores the imperative for believers to live in harmony, reflecting the self-giving love of Christ rather than self-serving factionalism.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Paul's direct confrontation of divisions in the Corinthian church serves as a timeless warning and a profound call to unity for believers in every age. The presence of "schisms" during corporate worship highlights how easily human pride, social distinctions, and personal preferences can infiltrate and corrupt even the most sacred of Christian practices. For us today, this verse compels us to critically examine the state of our own church communities. Are our gatherings characterized by genuine love, mutual respect, and a shared devotion to Christ, or do subtle (or not-so-subtle) divisions based on social status, political views, theological preferences, or personal cliques undermine our witness and hinder our spiritual growth? True Christian fellowship demands a commitment to humility, forgiveness, and active pursuit of peace, recognizing that our unity in Christ transcends all earthly distinctions. We are called to be vigilant against anything that would tear the fabric of the body of Christ, striving instead to build up one another in love.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was Paul only "partly" believing the reports of divisions, and what does this imply about his pastoral approach?
Answer: Paul's statement "I partly believe it" (καὶ μέρος τι πιστεύω) does not imply skepticism about the existence of divisions, but rather a discerning and measured approach to the specific details of the reports. It suggests that while the core accusation of "divisions" (σχίσματα) was undeniably true and sufficiently concerning to warrant his apostolic intervention, he might have been reserving judgment on the full extent or specific nuances of every rumor. This approach demonstrates Paul's pastoral wisdom: he doesn't dismiss the reports outright, showing he takes the concerns seriously, but he also avoids reacting solely based on unverified gossip. Instead, he addresses the undeniable reality of disunity that was clearly manifesting in their gatherings, as evidenced by their behavior during the Lord's Supper, which he details in the subsequent verses (e.g., 1 Corinthians 11:20-22). His "partly believe it" serves to validate the reports enough to justify his strong rebuke, while also subtly asserting his apostolic authority to judge the situation accurately.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The divisions in the Corinthian church, which Paul so sharply rebukes, stand in stark contrast to the unifying work of Christ. Jesus himself prayed for the unity of His followers, that "they may be one, just as we are one" (John 17:22). His entire ministry was dedicated to breaking down dividing walls—between Jew and Gentile, slave and free, male and female—to create "one new humanity" in Himself (Ephesians 2:14-16). The cross of Christ is the ultimate display of reconciliation, not just between God and humanity, but also among humanity, bringing together all who believe into a single body. Therefore, when Paul addresses the "divisions" in Corinth, he is not merely correcting a social faux pas but confronting a fundamental contradiction to the very essence of the Gospel and the unifying power of Christ's atoning work. The Lord's Supper, which immediately follows this discussion, is meant to be a profound expression of this Christ-purchased unity, where believers partake in one bread and one cup, symbolizing their shared identity in the one body of Christ (1 Corinthians 10:16-17). Any division within the church, especially during this sacred meal, tragically undermines the very truth that Christ died to establish: a unified people redeemed by His blood, called to live in harmony as members of His body (Romans 12:5).