1 Corinthians 11:1
“Christian Liberty and Edification”1 Corinthians 10:23–11:1
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- ΜιμηταίMimētaiImitatorsG3402N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
- μουmouof meG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
- γίνεσθεginesthedo beG1096V-PNM-2PVerb Present Middle Or Passive Deponent Imperative 2nd Plural
- καθὼςkathōseven asG2531CONJConjunction
- κἀγὼkagōI myself also [am]G2532P-1NS + G2532=CONJ
- ΧριστοῦChristouof ChristG5547N-GSM-TNoun Genitive Singular Masculine Title
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Corinthians 11:1–16. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Paul, having answered the cases put to him, proceeds in this chapter to the redress of grievances. The first verse of the chapter is put, by those who divided the epistle into chapters, as a preface to the rest of the epistle, but seems to have been a more proper close to the last, in which he had enforced the cautions he had given against the abuse of liberty, by his own example: Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ (1 Corinthians 11:1), fitly closes his argument; and the way of speaking in the next verse looks like a transition to another. But, whether it more properly belong to this or the last chapter, it is plain from it that Paul not only preached such doctrine as they ought to believe, but led such a life as they ought to imitate. "Be ye followers of me," that is, "Be imitators of me; live as you see me live." Note, Ministers are likely to preach most to the purpose when they can press their hearers to follow their example. Yet would not Paul be followed blindly neither. He encourages neither implicit faith nor obedience. He would be followed himself no further than he followed Christ. Christ's pattern is a copy without a blot; so is no man's else. Note, We should follow no leader further than he follows Christ. Apostles should be left by us when they deviate from the example of their Master. He passes next to reprehend and reform an indecency among them, of which the women were more especially guilty, concerning which observe,
I.How he prefaces it.
He begins with a commendation of what was praiseworthy in them (1 Corinthians 11:2): I praise you, that you remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances as I delivered them to you. Many of them, it is probable, did this in the strictest sense of the expression: and he takes occasion thence to address the body of the church under this good character; and the body might, in the main, have continued to observe the ordinances and institutions of Christ, though in some things they deviated fRom. and corrupted, them. Note, When we reprove what is amiss in any, it is very prudent and fit to commend what is good in them; it will show that the reproof is not from ill-will, and a humour of censuring and finding fault; and it will therefore procure the more regard to it.
II.How he lays the foundation for his reprehension by asserting the superiority of the man over the woman:
I would have you know that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is the man, and the head of Christ is God. Christ, in his mediatorial character and glorified humanity, is at the head of mankind. He is not only first of the kind, but Lord and Sovereign. He has a name above every name: though in this high office and authority he has a superior, God being his head. And as God is the head of Christ, and Christ the head of the whole human kind, so the man is the head of the tow sexes: not indeed with such dominion as Christ has over the kind or God has over the man Christ Jesus; but a superiority and headship he has, and the woman should be in subjection and not assume or usurp the man's place. This is the situation in which God has placed her; and for that reason she should have a mind suited to her rank, and not do any thing that looks like an affectation of changing places. Something like this the women of the church of Corinth seem to have been guilty of, who were under inspiration, and prayed and prophesied even in their assemblies, 1 Corinthians 11:5. It is indeed an apostolical canon, that the women should keep silence in the churches (1 Corinthians 14:34; 1 Timothy 2:12), which some understand without limitation, as if a woman under inspiration also must keep silence, which seems very well to agree with the connection of the apostle's discourse, ch. 14. Others with a limitation: though a woman might not from her own abilities pretend to teach, or so much as question and debate any thing in the church yet when under inspiration the case was altered, she had liberty to speak. Or, though she might not preach even by inspiration (because teaching is the business of a superior), yet she might pray or utter hymns by inspiration, even in the public assembly. She did not show any affectation of superiority over the man by such acts of public worship. It is plain the apostle does not in this place prohibit the thing, but reprehend the manner of doing it. And yet he might utterly disallow the thing and lay an unlimited restraint on the woman in another part of the epistle. These things are not contradictory. It is to his present purpose to reprehend the manner wherein the women prayed and prophesied in the church, without determining in this place whether they did well or ill in praying or prophesying. Note, The manner of doing a thing enters into the morality of it. We must not only be concerned to do good, but that the good we do be well done.
III.The thing he reprehends is the woman's praying or prophesying uncovered, or the man's doing either covered, 1 Corinthians 11:4, 1 Corinthians 11:5.
To understand this, it must be observed that it was a signification either of shame or subjection for persons to be veiled, or covered, in the eastern countries, contrary to the custom of ours, where the being bare-headed betokens subjection, and being covered superiority and dominion. And this will help us the better to understand,
IV.The reasons on which he grounds his reprehension.
1.The man that prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonoureth his head, namely, Christ, the head of every man (1 Corinthians 11:3), by appearing in a habit unsuitable to the rank in which God has placed him. Note, We should, even in our dress and habits, avoid every thing that may dishonour Christ. The woman, on the other hand, who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head, namely, the man, 1 Corinthians 11:3. She appears in the dress of her superior, and throws off the token of her subjection. She might, with equal decency, cut her hair short, or cut it close, which was the custom of the man in that age. This would be in a manner to declare that she was desirous of changing sexes, a manifest affectation of that superiority which God had conferred on the other sex. And this was probably the fault of these prophetesses in the church of Corinth. It was doing a thing which, in that age of the world, betokened superiority, and therefore a tacit claim of what did not belong to them but the other sex. Note, The sexes should not affect to change places. The order in which divine wisdom has placed persons and things is best and fittest: to endeavour to amend it is to destroy all order, and introduce confusion. The woman should keep to the rank God has chosen for her, and not dishonour her head; for this, in the result, is to dishonour God. If she was made out of the man, and for the man, and made to be the glory of the man, she should do nothing, especially in public, that looks like a wish of having this order inverted.
2.Another reason against this conduct is that the man is the image and glory of God, the representative of that glorious dominion and headship which God has over the world. It is the man who is set at the head of this lower creation, and therein he bears the resemblance of God. The woman, on the other hand, is the glory of the man (1 Corinthians 11:7): she is his representative. Not but she has dominion over the inferior creatures, as she is a partaker of human nature, and so far is God's representative too, but it is at second-hand. She is the image of God, inasmuch as she is the image of the man: For the man was not made out of the woman, but the woman out of the man, 1 Corinthians 11:8. The man was first made, and made head of the creation here below, and therein the image of the divine dominion; and the woman was made out of the man, and shone with a reflection of his glory, being made superior to the other creatures here below, but in subjection to her husband, and deriving that honour from him out of whom she was made.
3.The woman was made for the man, to be his help-meet, and not the man for the woman. She was naturally, therefore, made subject to him, because made for him, for his use, and help, and comfort. And she who was intended to be always in subjection to the man should do nothing, in Christian assemblies, that looks like an affectation of equality.
4.She ought to have power on her head, because of the angels. Power, that is, a veil, the token, not of her having the power or superiority, but being under the power of her husband, subjected to him, and inferior to the other sex. Rebekah, when she met Isaac, and was delivering herself into his possession, put on her veil, in token of her subjection, Genesis 24:65. Thus would the apostle have the women appear In Christian assemblies, even though they spoke there by inspiration, because of the angels, that is, say some, because of the evil angels. The woman was first in the transgression, being deceived by the devil (1 Timothy 2:14), which increased her subjection to man, Genesis 3:16. Now, believe evil angels will be sure to mix in all Christian assemblies, therefore should women wear the token of their shamefacedness and subjection, which in that age and country, was a veil. Others say because of the good angels. Jews and Christians have had an opinion that these ministering spirits are many of them present in their assemblies. Their presence should restrain Christians from all indecencies in the worship of God. Note, We should learn from all to behave in the public assemblies of divine worship so as to express a reverence for God, and a content and satisfaction with that rank in which he has placed us.
V.He thinks fit to guard his argument with a caution lest the inference be carried too far (1 Corinthians 11:11, 1 Corinthians 11:12):
Nevertheless, neither is the man without the woman, nor the woman without the man in the Lord. They were made for one another. It is not good for him to be alone (Genesis 2:18), and therefore was a woman made, and made for the man; and the man was intended to be a comfort, and help, and defence, to the woman, though not so directly and immediately made for her. They were made to be a mutual comfort and blessing, not one a slave and the other a tyrant. Both were to be one flesh (Genesis 2:24), and this for the propagation of a race of mankind. They are reciprocal instruments of each other's production. As the woman was first formed out of the man, the man is ever since propagated by the woman (1 Corinthians 11:12), all by the divine wisdom and power of the First Cause so ordaining it. The authority and subjection should be no greater than are suitable to two in such near relation and close union to each other. Note, As it is the will of God that the woman know her place, so it is his will also that the man abuse not his power.
VI.He enforces his argument from the natural covering provided for the woman (1 Corinthians 11:13-15):
"Judge in yourselves - consult your own reason, hearken to what nature suggests - is it comely for a woman to pray to God uncovered? Should there not be a distinction kept up between the sexes in wearing their hair, since nature has made one? Is it not a distinction which nature has kept up among all civilized nations? The woman's hair is a natural covering; to wear it long is a glory to her; but for a man to have long hair, or cherish it, is a token of softness and effeminacy." Note, It should be our concern, especially in Christian and religious assemblies, to make no breach upon the rules of natural decency.
VII.He sums up all by referring those who were contentious to the usages and customs of the churches, 1 Corinthians 11:16.
Custom is in a great measure the rule of decency. And the common practice of the churches is what would have them govern themselves by. He does not silence the contentious by mere authority, but lets them know that they would appear to the world as very odd and singular in their humour if they would quarrel for a custom to which all the churches of Christ were at that time utter strangers, or against a custom in which they all concurred, and that upon the ground of natural decency. It was the common usage of the churches for women to appear in public assemblies, and join in public worship, veiled; and it was manifestly decent that they should do so. Those must be very contentious indeed who would quarrel with this, or lay it aside.
Historical interpretation
Nineteen Centuries of Reception
11 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Wherefore it behoves us also to live according to the will of God in Christ, and to imitate Him as Paul did. For, says he, "Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ."
If you imitate Paul as he imitated Christ, then you will be imitating Christ as he represented God.
And openly and expressly the apostle, in the first Epistle to the Corinthians says, "Be ye followers of me, as also I am of Christ," in order that that may take place. If ye are of me, and I am of Christ, then ye are imitators of Christ, and Christ of God. Assimilation to God, then, so that as far as possible a man becomes righteous and holy with wisdom, he lays down as the aim of faith, and the end to be that restitution of the promise which is effected by faith.
So far, however, as regards the dress of women, the variety of observance compels us-men of no consideration whatever-to treat, presumptuously indeed, after the most holy apostle, except in so far as it will not be presumptuously if we treat the subject in accordance with the apostle.
If he who says so speaks the truth, let us ask him to explain what was the evil which the apostle hated and willed not to do, but did; and the good which he willed to do, but did not; and conversely, whether as often as he willed to do good, so often he did not do the good which he willed, but did the evil which he willed not? And how he can say, when exhorting us to shake off all manner of sin, "Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ? "
What, then, is it? Truly religion is the cultivation of the truth, but superstition of that which is false. And it makes the entire difference what you worship, not how you worship, or what prayer you offer. But because the worshippers of the gods imagine themselves to be religious, though they are superstitious, they are neither able to distinguish religion from superstition, nor to express the meaning of the names.
If, indeed, the goal of Christianity is the imitation of Christ according to the measure of his incarnation, insofar as is conformable with the vocation of each individual, they who are entrusted with the guidance of many others are obliged to animate those still weaker than themselves, by their assistance, to the imitation of Christ.
It is normal that we should imitate those whom God has set over us as teachers. For if they imitate God, why should we not imitate them? For just as God the Father sent Christ as the teacher and author of life, so Christ sent the apostles to be our teachers, so that we should imitate them, for we are unable to imitate him directly.
"Be ye imitators of me, even as I also am of Christ."
This is a rule of the most perfect Christianity, this is a landmark exactly laid down, this is the point that stands highest of all; viz. the seeking those things which are for the common profit: which also Paul himself declared, by adding, "even as I also am of Christ." For nothing can so make a man an imitator of Christ as caring for his neighbors. Nay, though thou shouldest fast, though thou shouldest lie upon the ground, and even strangle thyself, but take no thought for thy neighbor; thou hast wrought nothing great, but still standest far from this Image, while so doing.
However, in the case before us, even the very thing itself is naturally useful, viz; the abstaining from idol-sacrifices. But "I," saith he, "have done many of those things which were unprofitable also: e.g., when I used circumcision, when I offered sacrifice; for these, were any one to examine them in themselves, rather destroy those that follow after them and cause them to fall from salvation: nevertheless, I submitted even to these on account of the advantage therefrom: but here is no such thing. For in that case, except there accrue a certain benefit and except they be done for others' sake, then the thing becomes injurious: but in this, though there be none made to stumble, even so ought one to abstain from the things forbidden.
But not only to things hurtful have I submitted, but also to things toilsome. For, "I robbed other Churches," saith he, "taking wages of them; and when it was lawful to eat and not to work, I sought not this, but chose to perish of hunger rather than offend another." This is why he says, "I please all men in all things." "Though it be against the law, though it be laborious and hazardous, which is to be done, I endure all for the profit of others. So then, being above all in perfection, he became beneath all in condescension."
Cassian told this story about John, who was the father of a community because he was great in his way of life. When he was dying, he was cheerful, and his mind was set upon the Lord; his brothers stood around him and asked for a sentence that would sum up the way to salvation, which he could give them as a legacy by which they might rise to the perfection that is in Christ. With a sigh he said ‘I have never obeyed my own will, and I never taught anyone to do anything which I did not do myself first.’
A perfect practice of Christianity would, of course, consist in a perfect imitation of the life of Christ—I mean, insofar as it was applicable in one's own particular circumstances. Not in an idiotic sense—it doesn't mean that every Christian should grow a beard, or be a bachelor, or become a traveling preacher. It means that every single act and feeling, every experience, whether pleasant or unpleasant, must be referred to God. It means looking at everything as something that comes from Him, and always looking to Him and asking His will first, and saying: "How would He wish me to deal with this?"
Continue studying 1 Corinthians 11:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Paul calls the Corinthians to imitate him as he imitates Christ, who is the measure of every human example.
“Be ye followers of me,”
Become imitators of Paul in the self-giving love he has just described.
“even as I also am of Christ.”
Christ is the pattern Paul follows and the measure of his example.
Passage study1 Corinthians 10:23–11:1
Freedom Used for Others and for God’s Glory
Summary
Paul is finishing the long answer of 1 Corinthians 8–10 about meat that had been offered to idols. He grants the Corinthians’ saying that “all things are lawful”, and then he measures every free act by whether it helps and whether it builds others up. Meat from the market or from an unbeliever’s table may be eaten with thanks and without inquiry, because the earth and everything in it belongs to the Lord. When someone at the table points out that the meat was offered to an idol, love for that person’s conscience sets the freedom aside. Over all of it Paul sets one rule for the whole of life, “do all to the glory of God”, and one example: himself, seeking the good of many so that they may be saved, as he follows Christ.
Lawful, helpful and building up
Paul has already shown that an idol is nothing (1 Corinthians 8:4–6). In 1 Corinthians 9 he set out his own example of giving up his rights for the gospel, and he then warned from Israel’s history in the wilderness that God’s people can fall into idolatry (1 Corinthians 10:1–13). He has forbidden the Corinthians to share the table of idols at their feasts (1 Corinthians 10:14–22). Now he turns to the everyday meals that remain.
“All things are lawful for me” was probably a saying current in the Corinthian church among believers who knew their freedom in Christ. Paul quoted it once before, in 1 Corinthians 6:12, where his concern was the danger of being brought under the power of anything. Here his concern is what our freedom does to other people and to the unity of the church. He repeats the saying and agrees with it each time, then adds a test of his own after it, so that their liberty stands and its use is corrected.
The word for lawful, éxesti, is an impersonal verb meaning “it is permitted” or “it is lawful”. In matters such as food the believer truly is free, because Jesus taught that what enters a man from outside cannot defile him (Mark 7:18–19).
The first test is whether a thing is “expedient”. The Greek symphérō is formed from “together” and “to bear”, and it came to mean what brings advantage and does good. A thing may be allowed and still be of little use to us or to anyone else. The second test is whether it edifies. The verb oikodoméō means to build, and figuratively to build up, and Paul uses it throughout this letter for strengthening the faith of others and the church as a whole: “Let all things be done unto edifying” (1 Corinthians 14:26). With this second word the question moves from what helps me to what helps the body of Christ.
So the believer’s question about a free act has three parts: is it permitted, will it help, and will it build up the people around me? Paul has already warned that liberty used carelessly becomes a stumblingblock to the weak (1 Corinthians 8:9–13), and he gives the same warning in Romans 14:13.
Seeking another’s good
Verse 24 turns the two tests into a command: “Let no man seek his own, but every man another’s wealth.” The verb is zētéō, to seek, a word for actively pursuing something. “His own” is heautoû, the ordinary reflexive pronoun, and “but”, allá, sets the two halves of the verse against each other. “Every man”, hékastos, means each one of us, and what each one seeks is the good of “another”, héteros, the other person.
The word “wealth” is printed in italics in the KJV because the translators supplied it. The Greek says simply “the other’s” (to heterou), and Paul means the other person’s welfare, benefit and advantage, with money out of view. He writes the same to the Philippians: “Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others” (Philippians 2:3–4). He tells the strong in Rome to bear with the weak and please their neighbour for his good (Romans 15:1–3), and he tells the Galatians to use their freedom to serve one another in love (Galatians 5:13). Later in this letter he says that charity “seeketh not her own” (1 Corinthians 13:5). Corinth prized personal honour and rights, so the command cut across the ways of the city.
Eating what the market sells
Corinth was a busy port city full of temples. Animals were sacrificed to idols, and the edible portions were then sold in the public meat market, the macellum. The KJV’s “shambles” translates mákellon, a butcher’s stall or meat market. Paul is speaking of ordinary buying and selling, where the history of a cut of meat was usually unknown to the buyer, and he sets this market apart from the idol’s feast he has just forbidden.
His word is simple: “that eat.” He has already said that food does not commend us to God (1 Corinthians 8:8), and the meat on the stall is simply food. The believer is to buy it “asking no question for conscience sake”. The verb anakrínō means to examine or investigate, and with mēdeís, “not even one”, the phrase rules out any inquiry at all. The conscience, syneídēsis, is the inner moral sense that judges our actions and approves or condemns them. Asking where the meat came from would only load the believer’s conscience with a scruple over something clean, and a question asked aloud in the market could trouble a weaker brother who overheard it.
Jesus put it plainly: “Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man” (Matthew 15:11). Paul says the same in Romans 14:14, that nothing is unclean of itself, and in Titus 1:15, that to the pure all things are pure. He also tells the Colossians to let no man judge them in meat or in drink (Colossians 2:16). These verses free believers from anxious scrupulosity in a matter God has left free.
The earth is the Lord’s
Verse 26 gives the reason, in words taken from Psalm 24:1: “For the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof.” Paul quotes the psalm as it stands in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament. The earth, gē, is the land and ground of the world we live on. “Lord”, kýrios, is the one supreme in authority, a title of God. The fulness, plḗrōma, is what fills a thing: here everything the earth holds, its creatures, its produce and its plenty, the meat on the butcher’s stall among them.
Since all of it is God’s, an idol’s claim on it is empty, and a pagan rite has no power to take from God what is his. Every creature of God is good and is to be received with thanksgiving, for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer (1 Timothy 4:4–5). The New Testament also tells us that all things were created by the Son and for him, and that by him all things consist (Colossians 1:16–17), and that God has appointed him heir of all things (Hebrews 1:2). So the food we eat is the Father’s gift through the Son, and our freedom to enjoy it rests on who owns the world.
Should we care how our food is produced?
Verses 25 and 27 speak of meat that may have been offered to idols, and they teach that the defilement of a pagan rite stays with the rite and leaves the food clean. Questions of fair labour or the care of animals and the land belong to another part of God’s will, the call to act justly and lovingly in everything we do, our buying included. What these verses remove is a needless scruple about ritual impurity, and the rule of verse 23 still governs the rest.
At an unbeliever’s table
Verse 27 moves from the market to a private home. If an unbeliever “bid you to a feast”, using kaléō, to call or invite, “and ye be disposed to go”, the choice is yours. The phrase “disposed to go” joins the Greek words thélō, to will, and poreúomai, to go. Invitations from neighbours, friends and people one did business with were part of life in Corinth, and a guest was expected to accept what was served, so that refusing food or asking pointed questions could give real offence.
Paul’s rule matches the market: “whatsoever is set before you, eat.” “Whatsoever” comes from pâs, all or every, and it covers the whole table. The words “asking no question for conscience sake” close this verse as they closed verse 25, and here they keep the believer’s own conscience clear of a doubt he has no need to raise.
This freedom keeps doors open for the gospel. Jesus ate with publicans and sinners (Matthew 9:10–13), and Paul made himself all things to all men so that he might by all means save some (1 Corinthians 9:19–23). Christ has made us free, and we are to stand fast in that liberty (Galatians 5:1), a freedom that lets a believer sit as a gracious guest at an unbeliever’s table.
When someone says, “This is offered in sacrifice unto idols”
The question Paul first raised in 1 Corinthians 8 comes to its sharpest case in verse 28. If someone at the meal says plainly that the meat is eidōlóthyton, a thing sacrificed to an idol, the believer is to “eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake”. The meat is the same as before. What has changed is that a person has drawn attention to its origin, and eating now would say something to that person.
Who that person is the verse leaves open, and believers differ on it. On one reading he is a fellow believer with a weak conscience, who would be drawn by the example to eat against his own conviction. On another he is an unbeliever, perhaps the host or another guest, who would take the Christian’s eating as approval of the idol. On either reading the conscience in view belongs to the one who spoke, and love for him decides the matter.
Paul then repeats the words of the psalm: “for the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof.” The believer who gives up this dish loses nothing he needs, because every meal in the world is the Lord’s provision. He sets his freedom aside out of love for the other person, free of any fear that the meat could defile him.
Is food offered to idols defiled?
Food offered to an idol still belongs to the Lord, for “an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one” (1 Corinthians 8:4). The reason for abstaining in verse 28 lies wholly with the person who spoke, “for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake”.
Whose conscience, and why liberty is spoken against
Verse 29 makes the point exact: “Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other.” Paul assumes that the believer’s own conscience is clear about the meat. In this moment the conscience that matters is the other person’s, and caring for it is an act of self-denial and of love.
Then Paul asks, “for why is my liberty judged of another man’s conscience?” Liberty is eleuthería, freedom, here the believer’s real freedom from the food laws and from the power of idols. “Judged” is krínō, to distinguish or decide, and by implication to try or condemn. Paul speaks as the free believer would. If I go on eating after I have been told, my liberty, good as it is, will be condemned in another person’s mind, and something meant for God’s honour becomes a cause of division.
Verse 30 presses the same question: “For if I by grace be a partaker, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks?” To be a partaker, metéchō, is to share in the food. “By grace”, cháris, means that the believer’s freedom is God’s favour and gift. “Evil spoken of” is blasphēméō, to speak evil of, defame or revile. “Give thanks” is eucharistéō, to be grateful and to say so. There is an irony here, because the thanksgiving that honours God and sanctifies the food for the believer becomes the very thing others criticise. Paul’s answer follows at once in the “therefore” of verse 31, and it is to give no occasion for such talk.
Must the weakest conscience rule everything?
Paul asks us to give way where our action would truly lead a brother or sister to sin against their own conscience or be drawn away from Christ, and he is speaking of matters that are indifferent in themselves. A believer keeps his convictions and uses them with care, putting the spiritual health of the church ahead of the claim of a right. Every passing preference or unreasonable demand lies outside this rule, and knowing when to use liberty and when to hold it back takes wisdom, prayer and real knowledge of the people involved.
Can I do anything as long as I give thanks?
Thanksgiving sanctifies the food for the one who eats it, as Paul tells Timothy, and here Paul sets it at once under the rule of verses 31 to 33: God’s glory and the good of others. The thankful believer still asks whether his freedom helps and builds up, as verse 23 taught.
Do all to the glory of God
Verse 31 gathers the whole of 1 Corinthians 10 into one rule: “Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God.” The “therefore” ties it to the questions about meat. Eating and drinking are the plainest acts of daily life, and “whatsoever ye do” takes in all the rest: work, rest, home, friendships, decisions and motives. The verb poiéō, to make or do, is a word of very wide use, and pâs, all, leaves nothing outside the rule.
The word for glory, dóxa, speaks of God’s majesty, excellence and honour. To do something to the glory of God is to do it in a way that shows who he is and leads others to acknowledge his worth. God made his people for his glory (Isaiah 43:7). Paul tells the Colossians to do whatever they do, in word or deed, in the name of the Lord Jesus (Colossians 3:17), and he asks the Romans to present their bodies a living sacrifice (Romans 12:1). So the believer’s life is one piece, with ordinary meals and ordinary work as much a place of worship as the gathering of the church.
In daily practice this shows itself in a handful of ways:
Is there room to enjoy God’s gifts?
Enjoying God’s gifts with thanks is itself one way of glorifying him. Food, drink, friendship, work and the beauty of creation all come from his hand, and when our pleasure in them leads us to praise him, it honours him. Pleasure stops glorifying God when it becomes an idol or draws us away from him, so the question is always where the heart is turned.
Christ glorified the Father in everything
Jesus could tell his Father that he had glorified him on the earth and finished the work he was given to do (John 17:4). Every word, work and suffering of his life, down to its ordinary hours, was given to the Father’s glory, and so he fulfils this verse perfectly. We are called to be followers of God as dear children and to walk in love (Ephesians 5:1–2). United to Christ we walk in newness of life (Romans 6:4) and live for him who died for us and rose again (2 Corinthians 5:15). He is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15), and in the end every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Philippians 2:10–11).
Giving no offence to anyone
Verse 32 reads, “Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God.” The key word is apróskopos, formed from a negative and a verb meaning to strike against or stumble. Used actively, as here, it means inoffensive, a person whose conduct is free of anything that would trip another up. Used passively, it means blameless. Paul has in mind an action that leads someone into sin or doubt, or keeps him from receiving the gospel, which is a weightier thing than hurt feelings.
The three groups cover everyone. “The Jews”, Ioudaîos, are those belonging to Judah, Jewish by descent, whether or not they believe in Christ. Unbelieving Jews, who were strict about anything touching idolatry, should find in a Christian’s conduct nothing to keep them from considering Christ, and Jewish believers should have their convictions respected. “The Gentiles” translates Héllēn, Greek, used for the non-Jewish peoples, among them many who might yet come to faith and new believers still finding their way out of paganism. “The church of God” is the ekklēsía, the assembly or congregation of believers, and it belongs to theós, God. Within it our conduct should build unity and growth.
Peter likewise tells believers to keep their conduct honest among the Gentiles (1 Peter 2:12), and Paul prays that the Philippians may discern what is excellent (Philippians 1:10). The gospel does carry an offence of its own. Christ crucified is a stumblingblock to some and the power and wisdom of God to those who are called (1 Corinthians 1:23–24), and Paul speaks of “the offence of the cross” (Galatians 5:11). That offence belongs to the message, and verse 32 forbids the needless offence that our own careless choices would add to it.
Pleasing all men so that they may be saved
Verse 33 sets Paul’s own life before the Corinthians: “Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking mine own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved.” To please, aréskō, is to be agreeable to someone or to seek to be. “Profit” is symphérō, the same word that is translated “expedient” in verse 23, so Paul answers his own test with his own practice: what he weighs is the profit of others. “Many” takes in believers whose faith might be strengthened and unbelievers who might come to faith, and the aim is stated plainly, “that they may be saved”. The verb sṓzō means to save, deliver or protect, and here it is salvation from sin and its eternal end, through faith in Christ.
This is the rule of verse 24, now shown in a life, and it is the love that 1 Corinthians 13 describes. It is also Christ’s own way, for the Son of man came to minister and to give his life a ransom for many (Mark 10:45), and God so loved the world that he gave his Son, that whoever believes in him should have everlasting life (John 3:16).
Does “please all men” mean giving way on the truth?
Paul means a readiness to fit in with others in matters that are indifferent, such as food and social custom, so that nothing needless stands between them and the gospel. His purpose, “that they may be saved”, rules out flattery and the wish to be popular. Where the truth of the gospel was at stake Paul stood firm, and he confronted Peter openly when Peter’s conduct put it at risk (Galatians 2:11–14).
Followers of Paul as he is of Christ
“Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.” This verse closes the argument of chapter 10, and it also leads into the instructions on head coverings and the Lord’s Supper that follow in chapter 11.
The KJV’s “followers” translates mimētḗs, from miméomai, to imitate: one who deliberately patterns his life on another. “Be ye” is gínomai, to become, so Paul calls the Corinthians to become imitators of him. The pattern he has in mind is the one just described, giving up his own profit for the salvation of others. He made the same call earlier in the letter (1 Corinthians 4:16). In the Greek and Roman world a teacher’s disciples commonly copied their master’s way of life, and Paul takes up that familiar practice and ties it to Christ.
“Even as” (kathṓs) sets the limit. Paul is worth following as far as he follows Christ, the Anointed One, Christós, and Christ is the standard by which Paul’s example and every other teacher’s is measured. So the imitation of a godly leader always points past the leader. Peter says that Christ left us an example, that we should follow his steps (1 Peter 2:21), and God’s purpose is that his people be conformed to the image of his Son (Romans 8:29).
Was it proud of Paul to say “follow me”?
Paul offers his life as a pattern because he had lived out the gospel he preached, giving up his rights and bearing hardship for the Corinthians’ salvation. The second half of the verse puts Christ above him, so the Corinthians are to imitate Christ through a faithful human example, and the example itself is never to be worshipped.
Christ, who pleased not himself
Everything this passage asks of us is first true of Jesus. Being in the form of God, he “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant”, and humbled himself to the death of the cross (Philippians 2:5–8). He used his rights for others and sought our good to the uttermost. Christ “pleased not himself” (Romans 15:3), and Paul there applies Psalm 69:9 to him: the reproaches of those who reproached God fell on him. He was evil spoken of, as verse 30 puts it, while he bore the sins of others.
He came to minister and to give his life a ransom for many (Matthew 20:28). He laid down his life for his friends (John 15:13) and bare our sins in his own body on the tree (1 Peter 2:24). God made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin (2 Corinthians 5:21), and his blood purges our conscience (Hebrews 9:14). He is the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world (John 1:29). He too gave thanks over food, at the supper where he gave the bread and the cup as signs of his coming sacrifice (Luke 22:19–20). He is the Word made flesh (John 1:14), who learned obedience by the things which he suffered (Hebrews 5:8).
A freedom held open-handed
In this passage God gives his people a real freedom. The world and everything in it is his, so a believer can sit at any table and eat with thanks, untroubled by idols that are nothing. He also shows us what that freedom is for. The God who owns the earth gave his Son for us, and the Son spent his freedom in serving. So the believer’s liberty is held open-handed for the good of others, ready to be laid down at a word from a troubled conscience and spent on the salvation of many. Paul’s rule, “do all to the glory of God”, reaches every meal and every ordinary day, and his example points past himself to Christ, in whom all of it is fulfilled.
1 Corinthians 10:23
“All things are lawful for me,”
Paul grants the saying. In matters such as food, liberty in Christ is real.
“but all things are not expedient:”
Permission is the first question, and profit to ourselves and others the second.
“all things are lawful for me,”
Paul says it again, so that his readers know their freedom stays in place while he refines its use.
“but all things edify not.”
The third test looks to the whole church and asks whether an act will build others up.
1 Corinthians 10:24
“Let no man seek his own,”
A plain command against making our own advantage the aim of what we do.
“but every man another’s wealth.”
Each believer, with no exceptions, is to look to the other person’s well-being. “Wealth” is the translators’ word for that good.
1 Corinthians 10:25
“Whatsoever is sold in the shambles,”
The public meat market of everyday commerce, where the origin of the meat was usually unknown.
“that eat,”
Permission given as a command. The meat is food and nothing more.
“asking no question for conscience sake:”
Inquiry would create a scruple where God has left freedom.
1 Corinthians 10:26
“For the earth is the Lord’s,”
God owns the world now, as well as having made it, and no rite of men can take it from him.
“and the fulness thereof.”
All that fills the earth is included, the food on the table among it.
1 Corinthians 10:27
“If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast,”
A private meal in an unbeliever’s home, a different setting from a temple feast.
“and ye be disposed to go;”
Going is left to the believer’s own choice, and Paul welcomes such friendships.
“whatsoever is set before you, eat,”
The guest receives the meal graciously, as hospitality expects.
“asking no question for conscience sake.”
He keeps his own conscience free of doubts he has no reason to raise.
1 Corinthians 10:28
“But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols,”
A plain statement from someone present, where before there was only the general possibility.
“eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake:”
The abstaining is for the conscience of the one who spoke.
“for the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof:”
The psalm again, now the reason the believer can give up this dish without loss.
1 Corinthians 10:29
“Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other:”
Paul makes clear whose conscience verse 28 meant.
“for why is my liberty judged of another man’s conscience?”
A question asked from the free believer’s side, about freedom condemned in another’s mind.
1 Corinthians 10:30
“For if I by grace be a partaker,”
Sharing in the food as God’s gift.
“why am I evil spoken of”
Reviled by those who misunderstand what the believer is doing.
“for that for which I give thanks?”
The meal was received with thanks to God, and the criticism falls on the very thing given thanks for.
1 Corinthians 10:31
“Whether therefore ye eat, or drink,”
The most ordinary acts of life, chosen as examples.
“or whatsoever ye do,”
Everything else, with no part of life set apart from God.
“do all to the glory of God.”
The aim of every act, which settles the questions about meat and every question like them.
1 Corinthians 10:32
“Give none offence,”
Be a cause of stumbling to no one.
“neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles,”
Everyone outside the church, named by the two great divisions of the world as Paul knew it.
“nor to the church of God:”
Fellow believers, the people who belong to God.
1 Corinthians 10:33
“Even as I please all men in all things,”
Paul offers himself as the example, adapting to others within the bounds of God’s truth.
“not seeking mine own profit,”
The words of verse 24 lived out. His own advantage takes second place.
“but the profit of many, that they may be saved.”
The goal of all his yielding is the salvation of others.
1 Corinthians 11:1 This verse
“Be ye followers of me,”
Become imitators of Paul in the self-giving love he has just described.
“even as I also am of Christ.”
Christ is the pattern Paul follows and the measure of his example.
Last revised