2 Samuel 12:31

KJV

And he brought forth the people that [were] therein, and put [them] under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brickkiln: and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon. So David and all the people returned unto Jerusalem.

KJV (with Strong's)

And he brought forth {H3318} the people {H5971} that were therein, and put {H7760} them under saws {H4050}, and under harrows {H2757} of iron {H1270}, and under axes {H4037} of iron {H1270}, and made them pass {H5674} through the brickkiln {H4404}: and thus did {H6213} he unto all the cities {H5892} of the children {H1121} of Ammon {H5983}. So David {H1732} and all the people {H5971} returned {H7725} unto Jerusalem {H3389}.

Complete Jewish Bible

In addition, he expelled the people who were in it and set them to work with saws, iron harrows and iron axes, or had them cross over to work in the brick factory. This is what he did to all the cities of the people of 'Amon. Then David and all the people returned to Yerushalayim.

Berean Standard Bible

David brought out the people who were there and put them to work with saws, iron picks, and axes, and he made them work at the brick kilns. He did the same to all the Ammonite cities. Then David and all his troops returned to Jerusalem.

American Standard Version

And he brought forth the people that were therein, and put them under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, and made them pass through the brickkiln: and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon. And David and all the people returned unto Jerusalem.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
2 Samuel 12:31 concludes David's military campaign against the Ammonites, detailing the severe subjugation of the inhabitants of Rabbah and other Ammonite cities after their conquest. This verse portrays the harsh realities of ancient Near Eastern warfare, where defeated populations faced either forced labor under grueling conditions using various implements or, more grimly, execution by fire, underscoring the devastating consequences of conflict and the often-unforgiving nature of military victory in that era. It marks the successful end of the war, as David and his army return to Jerusalem after decisively subduing the Ammonite kingdom.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse marks an abrupt and jarring return to the military narrative following a profound theological and personal interlude in David's life. The war with Ammon, initiated in [2 Samuel 10](/2_samuel/10 "2 Samuel 10 - David's Messengers Insulted") due to King Hanun's egregious insult to David's envoys, had served as the grim backdrop for David's grievous sins involving Bathsheba and Uriah, comprehensively detailed in [2 Samuel 11](/2_samuel/11 "2 Samuel 11 - David's Sin with Bathsheba and Uriah"). The preceding verses of [2 Samuel 12](/2_samuel/12 "2 Samuel 12 - Nathan's Rebuke and David's Repentance") focus intensely on Nathan's prophetic confrontation of David, David's profound repentance, the tragic death of Bathsheba's first child, and the subsequent birth of Solomon. Verse 31, therefore, shifts the reader sharply back from the personal and theological consequences of David's sin to the geopolitical consequences of the war, presenting a stark and unsettling conclusion to the Ammonite conflict, highlighting the often-brutal realities of David's reign even amidst spiritual restoration.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** Ancient Near Eastern warfare was notoriously brutal, often involving the annihilation, enslavement, or severe subjugation of conquered peoples. The treatment described in 2 Samuel 12:31 reflects common, albeit extreme, practices of the time, which could include forced labor (e.g., in brick-making, quarrying, or agriculture) or various forms of torture and execution. The mention of "saws, harrows of iron, and axes of iron" points to implements that could be used for both arduous labor and, in extreme cases, for dismemberment or torture. The reference to "passing through the brickkiln" is particularly ambiguous, interpreted by some as forced labor in brick factories (a common fate for captives, reminiscent of Israel's bondage in Egypt) and by others as a horrific method of execution by fire, akin to human sacrifice or immolation, which was practiced by some pagan cultures in the region (e.g., Molech worship). Such acts served not only as punishment but also as a powerful deterrent to future rebellion and a stark demonstration of the conquering king's absolute power and dominance. The Ammonites, descendants of Lot, had a long history of animosity with Israel, often engaging in border conflicts and idol worship, which further contextualizes the severity of David's actions in the eyes of his contemporaries.
* **Key Themes:** This verse contributes to several key themes within the book of Samuel and the broader biblical narrative. It vividly illustrates the **brutality and devastating consequences of ancient warfare**, serving as a sobering reminder of human capacity for cruelty in conflict. It also highlights the **complexity of David's character**, revealing a darker, more ruthless side of his reign that occurred after his significant moral failures detailed in [2 Samuel 11](/2_samuel/11 "2 Samuel 11 - David's Sin with Bathsheba and Uriah"). While David is portrayed elsewhere as a "man after God's own heart" ([Acts 13:22](/acts/13-22 "Acts 13:22 - David, a Man After God's Own Heart")), this passage demonstrates that even God's chosen leaders could operate within and sometimes succumb to the harsh cultural norms of their time. Furthermore, it touches upon themes of **divine judgment** (against the Ammonites for their aggression and insult towards David's envoys, as seen in [2 Samuel 10:1-5](/2_samuel/10-1-5 "2 Samuel 10:1-5 - Hanun Insults David's Envoys")) and the **fulfillment of God's promise** to establish David's kingdom, even if achieved through means that are ethically challenging to modern readers. The narrative records these actions as historical events in the unfolding story of Israel, without explicitly endorsing them as divinely commanded.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **put (Hebrew, _sûwm'_ H7760):** A primitive root meaning "to put," used in a great variety of applications, literal and figurative. In this context, it signifies David's direct action in placing the conquered people in a state of subjugation or under the specified implements. The ambiguity of the following preposition "under" (not in provided Strong's) is compounded by this verb, which simply denotes the act of placing or setting, leaving the precise nature of the "putting" open to interpretation as either forced labor or execution.
* **pass (Hebrew, _ʻâbar'_ H5674):** A primitive root meaning "to cross over," used very widely of any transition (literal or figurative). Here, it describes the action of making the people "pass through" the brickkiln. This verb is crucial to understanding the fate of the Ammonites in relation to the brickkiln, implying either a forced movement through a dangerous environment for labor or a horrific passage through fire for execution, aligning with the dual interpretations of the "brickkiln" itself.
* **brickkiln (Hebrew, _malbên'_ H4404):** Derived from a root meaning "to whiten" (referring to the color of bricks), this term refers to a place where bricks are made, typically involving intense heat. The phrase "made them pass through the brickkiln" (וַיַּעֲבֵרֵם בַּמַּלְבֵּן, _vayya'avirem bammalben_) is highly debated. It could mean forced labor, where captives were made to work in the dangerous and arduous conditions of brick-making, a common form of servitude for conquered peoples (cf. Israel's bondage in Egypt, [Exodus 1:14](/exodus/1-14 "Exodus 1:14 - Israelites in Hard Bondage")). Alternatively, it could imply a horrific method of execution by fire, akin to human sacrifice or immolation, which was practiced by some pagan cultures in the region (e.g., Molech worship, [Leviticus 18:21](/leviticus/18-21 "Leviticus 18:21 - Child Sacrifice to Molech")). The parallel account in [1 Chronicles 20:3](/1_chronicles/20-3 "1 Chronicles 20:3 - David's Treatment of Ammonites") omits this specific phrase, adding to the interpretive challenge.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"And he brought forth the people that [were] therein":** This refers to David personally overseeing the disposition of the inhabitants of Rabbah, the Ammonite capital, after its capture. It emphasizes David's direct involvement and authority as the victorious king in determining the fate of the conquered population.
* **"and put [them] under saws, and under harrows of iron, and under axes of iron":** This clause describes the specific implements used in the subjugation. The interpretation hinges on the preposition "under." If literal, it suggests a gruesome form of execution or torture, where people were cut, torn, or hacked to death. If figurative, it implies forced labor, where the Ammonites were subjected to the most arduous and demeaning work using these heavy tools, perhaps as slaves in logging, farming, or mining operations. Both interpretations convey extreme suffering and complete subjugation.
* **"and made them pass through the brickkiln":** This phrase adds another layer of severity to the treatment. As detailed in the key word analysis, this could mean forcing the captives into slave labor in the dangerous and hot environment of brick factories, a common punishment for conquered peoples. Alternatively, and more horrifically, it could describe their execution by burning them alive in the kilns, a practice that, while extreme, was not unknown in ancient warfare and ritualistic practices among some pagan nations.
* **"and thus did he unto all the cities of the children of Ammon":** This crucial detail indicates that the severe treatment described was not an isolated incident confined to Rabbah but was systematically applied to all the conquered cities of the Ammonites. This demonstrates the widespread and comprehensive nature of David's subjugation of the Ammonite kingdom, ensuring their complete submission and preventing future rebellion.
* **"So David and all the people returned unto Jerusalem":** This concluding statement marks the successful completion of the Ammonite campaign. It signifies the triumphant return of David and his army to the capital, bringing the narrative of the conflict to a close. The stark contrast between the preceding brutality and the peaceful return to Jerusalem highlights the harsh realities and accepted norms of the ancient world regarding military conquest.

#### Literary Devices
The passage employs powerful **Imagery** to convey the brutality of David's actions. The explicit mention of "saws," "harrows of iron," "axes of iron," and "brickkiln" creates vivid and disturbing mental pictures of suffering and subjugation, whether through forced labor or execution. There is also a strong element of **Juxtaposition** in the broader narrative of [2 Samuel 12](/2_samuel/12 "2 Samuel 12 - Nathan's Rebuke and David's Repentance"). The chapter begins with Nathan's powerful rebuke of David's sin, leading to David's profound repentance and God's forgiveness, followed by the birth of Solomon, a sign of divine grace. This personal and theological drama is sharply contrasted with the sudden shift back to the military conquest and the severe treatment of the Ammonites in verse 31. This **Narrative Shift** is jarring, forcing the reader to grapple with the complexities of David's character and the harsh realities of his reign, even after his spiritual restoration. The ambiguity surrounding the precise nature of the "under" and "brickkiln" phrases could also be seen as a form of **Euphemism** or **Understatement** if the actions were indeed executions, allowing the text to describe horrific acts without explicit, graphic detail, or it could be a **Metonymy** where the tools represent the forced labor associated with them.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
2 Samuel 12:31 presents a challenging passage for modern readers, forcing us to confront the ethical complexities within the biblical narrative. While God is sovereign and uses imperfect human agents to accomplish His purposes, this verse highlights the brutal realities of ancient warfare and the actions of human kings, which do not always align with the full revelation of God's character, particularly His mercy and justice as revealed in Christ. It reminds us that even "men after God's own heart" can engage in actions that reflect the fallenness of humanity and the harsh norms of their culture, rather than divine standards. The passage serves as a stark reminder of the devastating human cost of sin and conflict, both for the aggressors (Ammon) and those who execute judgment (Israel). It compels us to consider how God works through historical events and human choices, even those that cause discomfort, to achieve His broader redemptive purposes, ultimately pointing to a greater King whose reign is defined by love, peace, and restorative justice.

* [Deuteronomy 20:10-18](/deuteronomy/20-10-18 "Deuteronomy 20:10-18 - Laws Concerning Warfare")
* [1 Chronicles 20:3](/1_chronicles/20-3 "1 Chronicles 20:3 - Parallel Account of Ammonite Treatment")
* [Psalm 137:8-9](/psalm/137-8-9 "Psalm 137:8-9 - Lament for Babylon and Her Destruction")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
This passage, while difficult, offers profound opportunities for reflection and spiritual growth. It prevents us from sanitizing biblical history or creating an idealized, flawless view of its heroes. David, despite his profound spiritual depth, anointing, and genuine repentance, was undeniably a product of his time and capable of great severity. This unflinching honesty in the biblical narrative reminds us that the Bible is a realistic portrayal of human nature, even among those chosen by God. For believers, it underscores the ongoing need for spiritual discernment, to carefully distinguish between cultural practices of a specific historical period and the timeless, unchanging divine mandates for righteousness, mercy, and justice. It calls us to lament the horrors of war and the dehumanization of enemies, while also recognizing that God's justice can manifest in ways that challenge our contemporary sensibilities. Ultimately, this challenging text directs our gaze to the perfect standard of Christ, whose kingdom operates on principles radically different from earthly power structures and whose victory is achieved through self-giving love.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does 2 Samuel 12:31 challenge or deepen your understanding of King David's character and reign, especially in light of his repentance in the preceding verses?**
* **What does this passage reveal about the nature of ancient warfare, and how should believers approach such ethically challenging biblical texts with both intellectual honesty and spiritual humility?**
* **In what ways does this verse highlight the tension between God's perfect will and the imperfect, culturally influenced actions of His people throughout history, ultimately pointing to the need for a perfect King?**

### FAQ

**Was David's treatment of the Ammonites explicitly commanded or justified by God?**

Answer: The biblical text does not explicitly state that God commanded David to treat the Ammonites in this specific, brutal manner. While God had commanded the Israelites to utterly destroy certain Canaanite nations as part of their conquest of the Promised Land (e.g., [Deuteronomy 20:16-18](/deuteronomy/20-16-18 "Deuteronomy 20:16-18 - Command to Destroy Canaanites")), the Ammonites were not among those nations designated for complete annihilation. David's actions here appear to reflect the harsh realities and common practices of ancient Near Eastern warfare, where victorious kings often subjugated or annihilated defeated populations as a display of power, a means of control, and a deterrent to future rebellion. Scholars debate whether the passage describes literal torture and execution or forced labor, but in either case, it represents extreme severity. The narrative records David's actions as historical events without explicit divine endorsement or condemnation, leaving readers to grapple with the moral implications within the broader context of God's character and commands.

**How does the account in 1 Chronicles 20:3 compare to 2 Samuel 12:31, and does it offer a different interpretation?**

Answer: The parallel account in [1 Chronicles 20:3](/1_chronicles/20-3 "1 Chronicles 20:3 - David's Treatment of Ammonites") uses very similar Hebrew phrasing to 2 Samuel 12:31, stating: "And he brought out the people who were in it and put them to work with saws, and with iron picks, and with axes." The key difference lies in the preposition "under" (Hebrew: _tahat_) used in 2 Samuel versus "with" (Hebrew: _b'_) in 1 Chronicles, and the omission of "pass through the brickkiln" in Chronicles, instead using "cut them with saws" or "put them to work with saws" depending on translation. While some scholars argue that 1 Chronicles presents a slightly softer interpretation, implying forced labor *with* tools rather than being *under* them for torture/execution, the overall sense of severe subjugation and harsh treatment remains consistent between the two accounts. Both passages describe a comprehensive and brutal subjugation of the Ammonites by David, emphasizing their complete defeat and reduction to servitude.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The brutal subjugation of the Ammonites by King David in 2 Samuel 12:31 stands in stark contrast to the reign and conquest of the ultimate King, Jesus Christ. David, as an earthly monarch, brought forth a people and subjected them to instruments of iron and fire, conquering through physical might and severe judgment to establish his earthly kingdom. This earthly kingdom, though divinely established, operated within the fallen realities and harsh norms of its time. In stark opposition, Jesus, the Son of David and the true Lamb of God, conquers not with saws, harrows, or axes, but through self-sacrifice on a wooden cross. He does not put His enemies "under" instruments of torture, but rather takes the full weight of judgment upon Himself, conquering sin, death, and the powers of darkness through His suffering and resurrection ([Colossians 2:15](/colossians/2-15 "Colossians 2:15 - Triumph Over Principalities and Powers")). While David's victory over the Ammonites involved physical destruction and forced labor, Christ's victory invites all peoples to freedom from the bondage of sin and into His kingdom of peace, where swords are beaten into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks ([Isaiah 2:4](/isaiah/2-4 "Isaiah 2:4 - Swords into Plowshares")). His kingdom is "not of this world" ([John 18:36](/john/18-36 "John 18:36 - My Kingdom Is Not of This World")), and His call is to love enemies and pray for those who persecute ([Matthew 5:44](/matthew/5-44 "Matthew 5:44 - Love Your Enemies")). Thus, 2 Samuel 12:31, though a difficult passage, ultimately highlights the radical difference between earthly kingship, even that of a divinely chosen king, and the redemptive, merciful, and spiritually transformative reign of Christ, whose victory is for the salvation of all who believe.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

1 Chronicles 20:3

And he brought out the people that [were] in it, and cut [them] with saws, and with harrows of iron, and with axes. Even so dealt David with all the cities of the children of Ammon. And David and all the people returned to Jerusalem.

2 Samuel 8:2

And he smote Moab, and measured them with a line, casting them down to the ground; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and with one full line to keep alive. And [so] the Moabites became David's servants, [and] brought gifts.

Psalms 21:8

Thine hand shall find out all thine enemies: thy right hand shall find out those that hate thee.

Psalms 21:9

Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger: the LORD shall swallow them up in his wrath, and the fire shall devour them.

Amos 1:3

¶ Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: