Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thus saith H559 the LORD H3068; For three H7969 transgressions H6588 of Damascus H1834, and for four H702, I will not turn away H7725 the punishment thereof; because they have threshed H1758 Gilead H1568 with threshing instruments H2742 of iron H1270:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Here is what ADONAI says: "For Dammesek's three crimes, no, four - I will not reverse it - because they threshed Gil'ad with an iron-spiked threshing-sledge;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
This is what the LORD says: “For three transgressions of Damascus, even four, I will not revoke My judgment, because they threshed Gilead with sledges of iron.
Ask
American Standard Version
Thus saith Jehovah: For three transgressions of Damascus, yea, for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Thus says the LORD: “For three transgressions of Damascus, yes, for four, I will not turn away its punishment; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thus saith the Lord, For three transgressions of Damascus, and for foure I will not turne to it, because they haue threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of yron.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And thus said Jehovah: For three transgressions of Damascus, And for four, I do not reverse it, Because of their threshing Gilead with sharp-pointed irons,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 22,368 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Amos 1:3 introduces the first in a series of divine pronouncements of judgment against the nations surrounding Israel, specifically targeting Damascus, the capital of Aram (Syria). The verse declares that because of Damascus's extreme and repeated acts of brutality against Gilead, a region east of the Jordan River, the Lord's patience has been exhausted, and His irreversible punishment will be unleashed. This oracle establishes God's universal sovereignty and His unwavering commitment to justice, holding even pagan nations accountable for their inhumane actions.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Amos 1:3 marks the beginning of the "Oracles Against the Nations" (Amos 1:3-2:16), a distinct literary unit within the book of Amos. Following the superscription (Amos 1:1-2) which sets the prophetic stage, this verse initiates a structured series of judgments. Each oracle follows a similar pattern: "Thus says the LORD; For three transgressions... and for four, I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof; because..." This repetitive formula builds suspense and emphasizes the cumulative nature of sin before culminating in the judgments against Judah and Israel themselves. By starting with foreign nations, Amos strategically prepares his Israelite audience to accept God's judgment, gradually drawing them into the realization that they, too, are accountable.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The prophecy of Amos is set during the reigns of Uzziah king of Judah and Jeroboam II king of Israel (Amos 1:1), a period of relative peace and prosperity for both kingdoms, but also one marked by social injustice and moral decay. Damascus, the capital of Aram, was a powerful and long-standing adversary of Israel, with a history of military conflicts and territorial disputes, particularly over the Transjordanian region of Gilead. The specific act of "threshing Gilead with threshing instruments of iron" refers to a particularly cruel military tactic, likely during the Aramean incursions under Hazael or Ben-Hadad III (2 Kings 10:32-33 and 2 Kings 13:7). Threshing sledges were agricultural tools designed to separate grain from straw by crushing and tearing; their application to human beings signifies an act of extreme, dehumanizing brutality, akin to systematic torture or annihilation.
  • Key Themes: Amos 1:3 powerfully introduces several overarching themes that resonate throughout the book. Firstly, it underscores Divine Justice and Universal Accountability, demonstrating that God's moral law extends beyond His covenant people to all nations, holding them responsible for their actions, especially those involving cruelty and oppression. Secondly, the vivid imagery highlights the Severity of Inhumanity, emphasizing God's condemnation of extreme violence and barbarity. The "three transgressions... and for four" idiom introduces the theme of the Full Measure of Sin, indicating that a nation's cumulative wickedness can reach a tipping point where divine judgment becomes inevitable. Finally, the declaration "Thus saith the LORD" asserts God's Absolute Sovereignty over all earthly powers and events, portraying Him as the supreme Judge of all peoples, whose word is authoritative and unchallengeable. This sets the stage for the book's broader message that God's justice will ultimately prevail, even against those who believe themselves beyond reproach.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • transgressions (Hebrew, peshaʻ, H6588): This word (H6588) denotes a revolt, rebellion, or trespass. It signifies a deliberate breaking of a covenant or moral standard, implying a willful act of defiance against what is right. In this context, it refers to Damascus's egregious violations of universal moral norms, not necessarily a covenant with Yahweh, but the inherent moral order.
  • threshed (Hebrew, dûwsh, H1758): This primitive root (H1758) means to trample or thresh. It evokes the violent action of crushing and tearing, typically applied to grain. Its use here in relation to human beings underscores the brutal, dehumanizing, and utterly destructive nature of the violence inflicted by Damascus, likening people to inanimate crops.
  • threshing instruments of iron (Hebrew, chărûwtsot habbarzel, H2742): This phrase combines chărûwts (H2742), referring to a threshing-sledge with sharp teeth, and barzel (H1270), meaning iron. The combination emphasizes the extreme hardness, sharpness, and destructive capability of these tools. When applied to people, it paints a picture of merciless, grinding, and tearing violence, signifying a deliberate and systematic effort to inflict maximum pain and destruction.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Thus saith the LORD;": This opening phrase, a prophetic formula, establishes the divine authority behind the message. It asserts that the following declaration is not merely the prophet's opinion but the direct, authoritative word of Yahweh, the sovereign God of Israel and indeed, of all nations. It underscores the certainty and inevitability of the pronouncement.
  • "For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof;": This clause employs a numerical proverb (a merism) indicating a complete, overflowing measure of sin, not a literal count. "Three... and for four" signifies that Damascus's wickedness has reached its full capacity, exceeding God's patience. The phrase "I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof" means that God's determined judgment is irreversible and will certainly be executed. It highlights the divine resolve to bring justice.
  • "because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron:": This final clause provides the specific reason for God's judgment. It details the horrific act of cruelty perpetrated by Damascus against the inhabitants of Gilead. The imagery of "threshing" people with "iron instruments" vividly portrays an act of extreme, systematic, and dehumanizing brutality, where human beings were treated with the same destructive force as grain on a threshing floor, signifying a complete disregard for human life and dignity.

Literary Devices

Amos 1:3 is rich in Literary Devices that amplify its message. The most prominent is the Numerical Proverb or Merism in "For three transgressions... and for four." This idiomatic expression is not meant to be a literal tally but rather signifies a complete, overflowing, or excessive amount, indicating that Damascus's cumulative wickedness has reached a point of no return. It builds a sense of escalating culpability. Secondly, the verse employs a powerful Metaphor or Simile in "they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron." This agricultural imagery is applied to human beings, creating a visceral and horrifying picture of extreme brutality. The people of Gilead are likened to grain being crushed and torn apart by heavy, spiked tools, emphasizing the dehumanizing and utterly destructive nature of the violence. This vivid imagery serves to shock the audience and underscore the severity of the crime. Additionally, the phrase "Thus saith the LORD" functions as a Prophetic Formula, asserting divine authority and emphasizing the certainty and inevitability of the judgment that follows.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Amos 1:3 profoundly asserts God's universal sovereignty and His unwavering commitment to justice, extending His moral authority beyond Israel to all nations. It reveals that humanity is held accountable to a divine standard, regardless of whether they possess a covenant relationship with Yahweh. The specific condemnation of extreme brutality highlights God's abhorrence of inhumanity and oppression, demonstrating that He is a God who sees and responds to the suffering of the innocent. This verse sets the stage for the entire book of Amos, which consistently emphasizes that privilege (like Israel's covenant relationship) does not exempt one from judgment when moral and social righteousness are abandoned. God's justice is impartial and absolute, ensuring that all wrongs will ultimately be rectified.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Amos 1:3 serves as a stark reminder that God is neither blind nor indifferent to the injustices and cruelties perpetrated in the world. His moral law transcends national boundaries and religious affiliations, holding all humanity accountable for their actions, especially those that inflict suffering and dehumanize others. This ancient oracle challenges us to examine our own attitudes and actions toward those who are vulnerable or marginalized. It calls us to cultivate a deep empathy for victims of oppression and to actively oppose all forms of "threshing" – whether physical violence, systemic injustice, or emotional abuse – that crush the human spirit. Furthermore, it invites us to trust in the ultimate triumph of divine justice, finding solace in the knowledge that even when human systems fail, God's righteous judgment will prevail, ensuring that every wrong will eventually be made right. This should inspire us to participate in God's work of justice and compassion in our spheres of influence.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the concept of God's universal justice in Amos 1:3 challenge our understanding of accountability, both individually and corporately?
  • In what ways might we, even unintentionally, "thresh" or dehumanize others in our contemporary society, and how can we actively resist such tendencies?
  • How does the certainty of God's judgment against injustice strengthen our faith and motivate us to seek justice and mercy in the world?

FAQ

What is the significance of the phrase "For three transgressions... and for four"?

Answer: This phrase is a common Hebrew numerical proverb, also known as a merism or an ascending numerical proverb. It's not meant to be a literal count (e.g., exactly four sins) but rather a rhetorical device signifying a complete, overflowing, or excessive measure of something. In this context, it means that Damascus's wickedness has accumulated to such an extent that it has reached a tipping point; God's patience is exhausted, and irreversible judgment is now due. It emphasizes the cumulative nature of sin and the inevitability of divine response once a certain threshold of iniquity is crossed. This pattern is also seen in wisdom literature, such as Proverbs 30:15-31.

What does "threshing Gilead with threshing instruments of iron" mean?

Answer: This vivid imagery describes an act of extreme military brutality. A "threshing instrument" or "sledge" was a heavy wooden board or cart embedded with sharp stones or iron teeth, pulled by oxen over harvested grain to separate the kernels from the stalks. Applying this agricultural implement to human beings signifies a horrific, grinding, and utterly destructive form of violence. It portrays the people of Gilead being systematically crushed, torn, and annihilated, much like grain on a threshing floor. This illustrates the merciless and dehumanizing nature of the war crimes committed by Damascus, highlighting their complete disregard for human life and dignity. The "iron" emphasizes the unyielding hardness and destructive power of these tools.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Amos 1:3 speaks of God's judgment against a pagan nation for its cruelty, it ultimately points to the broader biblical narrative of divine justice and the ultimate solution found in Christ. The "threshing" of Gilead foreshadows the ultimate suffering and "threshing" that Christ endured on the cross, not for His own transgressions, but as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. He bore the full measure of humanity's transgressions, including all forms of injustice and cruelty, so that those who believe might escape the judgment that is due. Furthermore, Jesus Christ is presented in the New Testament as the righteous Judge, the one to whom all judgment has been committed by the Father. The impartial justice declared by the Lord in Amos finds its perfect and final expression in Christ, who will ultimately rectify all wrongs and establish a kingdom where righteousness and peace prevail. Thus, Amos's oracle, while a message of condemnation, implicitly highlights the profound need for a Savior who can address the root of human sin and establish true justice and peace, a need perfectly met in Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Amos 1 verses 3–15

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

What the Lord says here may be explained by what he says Jer 12:14, Thus said the Lord, against all my evil neighbours that touch the inheritance of my people Israel, Behold, I will pluck them out. Damascus was a near neighbour to Israel on the north, Tyre and Gaza on the west, Edom on the south, Ammon and (in the next chapter) Moab on the east; and all of them had been, one time, one way, or other, pricking briers and grieving thorns to Israel, evil neighbours to them; and, because God espouses his people's cause, he there calls them his evil neighbours, and here comes forth to reckon with them. The method is taken in dealing with each of them is, in part, the same, and therefore we put them together, and yet in each there is something peculiar.

I. Let us see what is repeated, both by way of charge and by way of sentence, concerning them all. The controversy God has with each of them is prefaced with, Thus said the Lord, Jehovah the God of Israel. Though those nations will not worship him as their God, yet they shall be made to know that they are accountable to him as their Judge. The God of Israel is the God of the whole earth, and has something to say to them that shall make them tremble. Against them the Lord roars out of Zion. And before God, by the prophet, threatens Israel and Judah, he denounces judgments against those nations whom he made use of as scourges to them for their being so, which might serve for a check to their pride and insolence and a relief to his people under their dejections; for hereby they might see that God had not quitted his interest in them, and therefore might hope they had not lost their interest in him. Now as to all these nations here arraigned,

1.The indictment drawn up against them all is thus far the same, (1.) That they are charged in general with three transgressions, and with four, that is, with many transgressions (as by one or two we mean a few, so by three or four we mean many, as in Latin a man that is very happy is said to be terque quarterque beatus - three and four times happy); or with three and four, that is, with seven transgressions, a number of perfection, intimating that they have filled up the measure of their iniquities, and are ripe for ruin; or with three (that is, a variety of sins) and with a fourth especially, which is specified concerning each of them, though the other three are not, as Pro 30:15, Pro 30:18, Pro 30:21, Pro 30:29, where we read of three things, yea, four, generally one seems to be more especially intended. (2.) That the particular sin which is fastened upon as the fourth, and which alone is specified, is the sin of persecution: it is some mischief or other done to the people of God that is particularly charged upon every one of them, for persecution is the measure-filling sin of any people, and it is this sin that will be particularly reckoned for - I was hungry, and you gave me no meat; much more if it may be said, I was hungry, and you took my meat from me.

2.The judgment given against them all is thus far the same, (1.) That, their sin having risen to such a height, God will not turn away the punishment thereof. Though he has granted them a long reprieve, and has often turned away their punishment, yet now he will turn it away no longer, but justice shall take its course. "I will not revoke it (so some read it); I will not recall the voice which has gone forth from Zion to Jerusalem (Amo 1:2), speaking death and terror to the sinful nations." It is an irrevocable sentence. God has spoken it, and he will not call it back. Note, Though God bear long, he will not bear always, with those that provoke him; and, when the decree brings forth, it will bring up. (2.) That God will kindle a fire among them; this is said concerning all these evil neighbours, Amo 1:4, Amo 1:7, Amo 1:10, Amo 1:12, Amo 1:14. God will send a fire into their cities. When fires are kindled that lay cities, towns, and houses in ashes, whether designedly or casually, God must be acknowledged in it; they are of his sending. Sin stirs up the fire of his jealousy, and that kindles other fires.

II. Let us see what is mentioned, both by way of charge and by way of sentence, that is peculiar to each of them, that every one may take his portion.

1.Concerning Damascus, the head-city of Syria, a kingdom that was often vexatious to Israel. (1.) The peculiar sin of Damascus was using the Gileadites barbarously: They threshed Gilead with threshing-instruments of iron (Amo 1:3), which may be understood literally of their putting to the torture, or to cruel deaths, the inhabitants of Gilead whom they got into their hands, as David put the Ammonites under saws and harrows Sa2 12:31. We read with what inhumanity Hazael king of Syria prosecuted his wars with Israel (Kg2 8:12); he dashed their children, and ripped up their women with child; and see what desolations he made in their land, Kg2 10:32, Kg2 10:33. Or it may be taken figuratively, for his laying the country waste, and this very similitude is used in the history of it. Kg2 13:7, He destroyed them, and made them like the dust by threshing. Note, Men often do that unjustly and wickedly, and shall be severely reckoned with for it, which yet God just permits them to do. The church is called God's threshing, and the corn of his floor (Isa 21:10); but if men make it their threshing, and the chaff of their floor, they shall be sure to hear of it. (2.) The peculiar punishment of Damascus is [1.] That the fire which shall be sent shall fasten upon the court in the first place, not on the chief city, nor the country towns, but on the house of Hazael, which he built; and it shall devour the palaces of Ben-hadad, the royal palaces inhabited by the kings of Syria, many of whom were of that name. Note, Even royal palaces are no defence against the judgments of God, though ever so richly furnished, though ever so strongly fortified. [2.] That the enemy shall force his way into the city (Amo 1:5): I will break the bar of Damascus, and then the gate flies open. Or it may be understood figuratively: all that which is depended upon as the strength and safety of that great city shall fail, and prove insufficient. When God's judgments come with commission it is in vain to think of turning them out. [3.] That the people shall be destroyed with the sword: I will cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, the valley of idolatry, for the gods of the Syrians were gods of the valleys (Kg1 20:23), were worshipped in valleys; as the idols of Israel were worshipped on the hills; him also that holdeth the sceptre of power, some petty king or other that used to boast of the sceptre he held from Beth-Eden, the house of pleasure. Both those that were given to idolatry and those that were given to sensuality should be cut off together. [4.] That the body of the nation shall be carried off. The people shall go into captivity unto Kir, which was in the country of the Medes. We find this fulfilled (Kg2 16:9) about fifty years after this, when the king of Assyria went up against Damascus, and took it, and carried the people of it captive to Kir, and slew Rezin, at the instigation of Ahaz king of Judah.

2.Concerning Gaza, a city of the Philistines, and now the metropolis of that country. (1.) The peculiar sin of the Philistines was carrying away captive the whole captivity, either of Israel or Judah, which some think refers to that inroad made upon Jehoram when they took away all the king's sons and all his substance (Ch2 21:17), or, perhaps, it refers to their seizing those that fled to them for shelter when Sennacherib invaded Judah, and selling them to the Grecians (Joe 3:4-6), or (as here) to the Edomites, who were always sworn enemies to the people of God. They spared none, but carried off all they could lay their hands on, designing, if possible, to cut off the name of Israel, Psa 83:4-7. (2.) The peculiar punishment of the Philistines is that the fire which God will send shall devour the palaces of Gaza, and that the inhabitants of the other cities of the Philistines, Ashdod (or Azotus), Ashkelon, and Ekron, shall all be cut off, and God will make as thorough work with them in their ruin as they would have made with God's people when they carried away the whole captivity; for even the remnant of them shall perish, Amo 1:8. Note, God will make a full end of those that think to make a full end of his church and people.

3.Concerning Tyre, that famous city of wealth and strength, that was itself a kingdom, Amo 1:9. (1.) The peculiar sin of Tyre is delivering up the whole captivity to Edom, that is, selling to the Edomites those of Israel that fled to them for shelter, or in any way fell into their hands; not caring what hardships they put upon them, so that they could but make gain of them to themselves. Herein they forgot the brotherly covenant, the league that was between Solomon and Hiram king of Tyre (Kg1 5:12), which was intimate that Hiram called Solomon his brother, Kg1 9:13. Note, It is a great aggravation of enmity and malice when it is the violation of friendship and of a brotherly covenant. (2.) Here is nothing peculiar in the punishment of Tyrus but that the palaces thereof shall be devoured, which was done when Nebuchadnezzar took it after thirteen years' siege. Their merchants were all princes, and their private houses were as palaces; but the fire shall make no more of them than of cottages.

4.Concerning Edom, the posterity of Esau. (1.) Their peculiar sin was an unmerciful, unwearied, pursuit of the people of God, and their taking all advantages against them to do them a mischief, Amo 1:11. He did pursue his brother with the sword, not only of old, when the king of Edom took up arms to oppose the children of Israel's passage through his border (Num 20:18), but ever since upon all occasions; they had not strength and courage enough to face them in the field of battle, but, whenever any other enemy had put Judah or Israel to flight, then the Edomites set in with the pursuers, fell upon the rear, slew those that were half dead already, and (as is usual with cowards when they have an enemy at an advantage) they did cast off all pity. Those that are least courageous are commonly most cruel. Edom was so; his malice destroyed his compassion (so the word is); he stripped himself of the tenderness of a man, and put on the fierceness of a beast of prey; and, as such a one, he did tear, his anger did tear perpetually. His cruelty was insatiable, and he never knew when he had sucked enough of the blood of Israel, but, like the horse-leech, still cried, Give, give. Nay, he kept his wrath for ever; when he wanted objects of his wrath, and opportunity to show it, yet he kept it in reserve (it rested in his bosom), he rolled it under his tongue as a sweet morsel, and had it ready to spit in the face of Israel upon the next occasion. Cursed be such cruel wrath, and anger so fierce, so outrageous, which makes men like the devil, who continually seeks to devour, and unlike to God, who keeps not his anger for ever. Edom's malice was unnatural, for thus he pursued his brother, whom he ought to have protected: it was hereditary, as if it had been entailed upon the family ever since Esau hated Jacob, and time itself could not wear it out, no, nor the brotherly conduct of Israel towards them (Deu 2:4), and the express law given to Israel (Deu 23:7), Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, for he is thy brother. (2.) Here is nothing peculiar in their punishment; but (Amo 1:12) a fire shall be sent to devour their palaces. Note, The fire of our anger against our brethren kindles the fire of God's anger against us.

5.Concerning the Ammonites, Amo 1:13-15. (1.) See how violently the fire of their anger turned against the people of God; they not only triumphed in their calamities (as we find, Eze 25:2, Eze 25:6), but they did themselves use them barbarously; they ripped up the women with child of Gilead, a piece of cruelty the very mention of which strikes a horror upon one's mind; one would think it is not possible that any of the human race should be so inhuman. Hazael was guilty of it, Kg2 8:12. It was done not only in a brutish rage, which falls without consideration upon all that comes before it, but with a devilish design to extirpate the race of Israel by killing not only all that were born, but all that were to be born, worse than Egyptian cruelty. It was that they might enlarge their border, that they might make the land of Gilead their own, and there might be none to lay claim to it or given them any disturbance in the possession of it. We find (Jer 49:1) that the Ammonites inherited Gad (that is, Gilead) under pretence that Israel had no sons, no heirs. We know how heavy the doom of those was, and how heinous their crime, who said, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours by occupancy. See what cruelty covetousness is the cause of, and what horrid practices those are often put upon that are greedy to enlarge their own border. (2.) See how violently the fire of God's anger burned against them; shall not God visit for these things done to any of mankind, especially when they are done to his own people? Shall not his soul be avenged on such a nation as this? No doubt, it shall. The fire shall be kindled with shouting in the day of battle, that is, war shall kindle the fire; it shall be a fire accompanied with the sword, or a roaring fire, which shall make a noise like that of soldiers ready to engage, and it shall be as a tempest in the day of the whirlwind, which comes swiftly, furiously, and bears down all before it. Or this tempest and whirlwind shall be as bellows to the fire, to make it burn the stronger, and spread the further. It is particularly threatened that their king and his princes shall go together into captivity, carried away by the king of Babylon, not long after Judah was. See what changes God's providence often makes with men, or rather their own sin; kings become captives, and princes prisoners. Milchom shall go into captivity; some understand it of the god of the Ammonites, whom they called Moloch - a king. He, and his princes, and his priests that attended him, shall to into captivity; their idol shall be so far from protecting them that it shall itself go into captivity with them. Note, Those who by violence and fraud seek to enlarge their own border will justly be expelled and excluded their own border; nor is it strange if those who make no conscience of invading the rights of others be able to make no resistance against those who invade theirs.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 3–15. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Homily 1, on Psalm 1
'Happy the man who follows not the counsel of the wicked.' [Psalm 1:1] In Genesis, we read how Adam was cursed: 'Cursed be the ground because of you;' but the first malediction pronounced against man is absolved and replaced with a benediction. The Old Law lays down, as it were, only one condition of blessedness; the Gospel, on the other hand, announces simultaneously eight beatitudes. 'Happy the man who follows not the counsel of the wicked.' Happy the man, not any man, but the man who has reached the perfection of the manhood of Christ: 'Who follows not the counsel of the wicked.'

Here, Scripture describes the three usual ways of committing sin: we entertain sinful thoughts; we commit sin in act; or we teach what is sinful. First, we entertain a sinful thought; then, after we have reflected upon it, we convert that thought into action. When we commit sin, moreover, we multiply sin by teaching others to do what we have done. 'Happy the man who follows not the counsel of the wicked' - who thinks no evil; 'nor has stood in the way of sinners' - who does no evil; 'nor sits in the company of the insolent' - who has not taught others to sin. He has not consorted with the scornful, 'nor has stood in the way of sinners.'

It is difficult for one not to sin. John the Evangelist says, in fact, that anyone who denies that he has sinned is a liar. [1 John 1:8] If, therefore, we all sin, what do the words mean, 'nor has stood in the way of sinners'? If we all sin, no one is happy, except, of course, the one who has not sinned. But we all sin, every last one of us, and so no one is blessed.

Consider, however, just what the Scripture says: 'nor has stood in the way of sinners.' Scripture did not say happy the man who has not sinned, but rather, happy the man who has not persevered in sin. 'Nor has stood in the way of sinners.' Yesterday I committed sin. I am not happy. If, however, I do not remain in the state of sin, but withdraw from sin, I become happy once more. 'Nor sits in the company of the insolent.' Why does it say 'sits' in this verse and 'has stood' in the preceding one? For this reason: just as he who has not stood - persisted - in sin is happy, so he who has not sat - persisted - in evil doctrine is happy. What does that mean? You see yourselves that the three determinants of beatitude consist in not thinking evil, in not persevering in sin, and in not teaching evil. This is really what the Prophet Amos says: 'For three crimes and for four, I will not revoke my word, says the Lord.' [Amos 1:3] Moreover, he says this same thing eight times. Now, this is what he actually is saying: you have entertained sin, I have pardoned you; you have done evil, I have forgiven you; you have not repented of your sins, I have excused you: did you also have to teach evil? What the Scripture implies is this: For three sins and for four, I shall not be angered against you, says the Lord. [Isaiah 57:16]
JeromeAD 420
LETTER 8
You must slay the allurements to vice while they are still only thoughts and dash the little ones of the daughter of Babylon against the stones where the serpent can leave no trail. Be wary and lay claim to the Lord’s promise: “Let them not have dominion over me: then shall I be upright and I shall be innocent from the great transgression.” For elsewhere also the Scripture testifies, “I will visit the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation.” That is to say, God will not punish us at once for our thoughts and resolves but will send retribution upon their offspring or upon the evil deeds and habits of sin, which arise out of the offspring. As he says by the mouth of Amos, “For three transgressions of such and such a city and for four I will not turn away the punishment thereof.”
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Amos
(Version 3.) Thus says the Lord: Because of three transgressions of Damascus, and because of four, I will not revoke the punishment; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing sledges of iron. LXX: And the Lord said: Because of three transgressions of Damascus, and because of four, I will not turn away from them; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing sledges of iron. Regarding the tribes, which are called Arsoth in Hebrew (), and have been translated by Theodotion as iron wheels, which we have interpreted as iron sledges, the Seventy have translated as threshing sledges of iron. But there is a type of wagon that is propelled by iron and toothed wheels, which, after the grain has been beaten out, crushes the straw in the threshing floor, and grinds the straw into food for animals due to the scarcity of hay. Furthermore, in the Hebrew language, where it is written Benadad (), and it is one name, the Seventy translated it as the sons of Ader, Res and Daleth by the similarity of false elements. In that place also where we said, concerning the house of pleasure, which is called Mebbeth Eden () in Hebrew, and they all translated it similarly, the Seventy translated it as from the men of Haran, considering Daleth as the middle letter of the name Res, and according to their custom, placing the Greek letter Chi (Χ) before the first Hebrew letter Ain. They also translated Cyrene, which is called Cira in Hebrew (ἑπήκλητον), that is, called or named, because of the similarity of the word, because Chares (Χάρης) can be called a calling, and they understood it as a proper name, an appellative. We have briefly mentioned the reasons for different translations: now let us move on to the meaning of what has been said. First, the word of God is directed against Damascus, where Azazel was reigning, who at that time when Amos was prophesying, was severely oppressing Israel, that is, the ten tribes: to such an extent that, after King Ahab of Israel was defeated in Ramoth-gilead, he would slaughter and crush all the region that was called Gilead, and had passed into the possession of the half tribe of Manasseh, like the wheat of tribulation in the threshing floors. What the prophet Elisha says more fully in the book of Kings, where we read: And he stood with him, and was troubled even to the reddening of his face, and the man of God wept. To whom Hazael said: Why does my lord weep? And he answered: Because I know the evil that you will do to the children of Israel. You will burn their fortified cities with fire, and you will slay their young men with the sword, and you will dash their little ones against the stones, and you will rip up their pregnant women. And Azazel said, 'For what am I, your servant, but a dog, that I should do this great thing?' And Elisha said, 'The Lord has shown me that you will be king over Syria.' (2 Kings 8:11ff). And what follows in the prophet.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Amos 1:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.