2 Chronicles 18:15

KJV

And the king said to him, How many times shall I adjure thee that thou say nothing but the truth to me in the name of the LORD?

KJV (with Strong's)

And the king {H4428} said {H559} to him, How many times {H6471} shall I adjure {H7650} thee that thou say {H1696} nothing but the truth {H571} to me in the name {H8034} of the LORD {H3068}?

Complete Jewish Bible

The king said to him, "How many times do I have to warn you to tell me nothing but the truth in the name of ADONAI?"

Berean Standard Bible

But the king said to him, “How many times must I make you swear not to tell me anything but the truth in the name of the LORD?”

American Standard Version

And the king said to him, How many times shall I adjure thee that thou speak unto me nothing but the truth in the name of Jehovah?

Commentary

### SUMMARY
King Ahab's frustrated and solemn demand compels the prophet Micaiah to speak unvarnished truth under a binding oath, marking a crucial moment of confrontation. This pivotal verse encapsulates the profound tension between human desire for favorable outcomes and the divine imperative for uncompromised truth, setting the stage for Micaiah's unpopular but accurate prophecy concerning Ahab's impending demise.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse is deeply embedded within a critical narrative found in [2 Chronicles 18](/2_chronicles/18 "2 Chronicles 18 - Ahab and Jehoshaphat at Ramoth-Gilead"), which has a parallel account in [1 Kings 22](/1_kings/22 "1 Kings 22 - The Death of Ahab"). The immediate preceding verses detail the alliance between King Jehoshaphat of Judah, a generally righteous monarch, and the notoriously wicked King Ahab of Israel, for the purpose of reclaiming Ramoth-gilead from the Arameans. Jehoshaphat, demonstrating his spiritual discernment, insists on seeking divine counsel before battle ([2 Chronicles 18:4-6](/2_chronicles/18-4-6 "2 Chronicles 18:4-6 - Jehoshaphat Seeks Divine Counsel")). Ahab, in response, gathers 400 of his own court prophets who, in unison, prophesy victory and success ([2 Chronicles 18:5](/2_chronicles/18-5 "2 Chronicles 18:5 - The 400 False Prophets Prophesy Victory")). Unsatisfied by their uniform and seemingly self-serving pronouncements, Jehoshaphat presses for a genuine prophet of the LORD ([2 Chronicles 18:6](/2_chronicles/18-6 "2 Chronicles 18:6 - Jehoshaphat's Discernment of False Prophets")). Ahab reluctantly points to Micaiah, whom he openly despises because Micaiah consistently prophesies ill concerning him ([2 Chronicles 18:7](/2_chronicles/18-7 "2 Chronicles 18:7 - Ahab's Hatred for Micaiah")). When Micaiah is finally brought before the kings, he initially offers a sarcastic affirmation of the false prophets' message, echoing their words of "Go up, and prosper" ([2 Chronicles 18:14](/2_chronicles/18-14 "2 Chronicles 18:14 - Micaiah's Initial Sarcasm")). This deliberate irony prompts Ahab's exasperated and forceful demand for honesty under solemn oath in [2 Chronicles 18:15](/2_chronicles/18-15 "2 Chronicles 18:15 - Ahab's Demand for Truth"), thereby clearing the path for Micaiah's true, albeit unwelcome, prophecy.

* **Historical & Cultural Context:** The narrative unfolds during the period of the divided monarchy in ancient Israel, with Ahab reigning over the northern kingdom of Israel and Jehoshaphat over the southern kingdom of Judah. Ahab's reign was characterized by rampant idolatry, particularly the promotion of Baal worship, and the persecution of Yahweh's prophets. In stark contrast, Jehoshaphat was largely committed to the worship of the LORD and initiated religious reforms in Judah. The alliance between these two kings, while politically pragmatic, underscores the spiritual chasm between their respective kingdoms. Prophets in ancient Israel functioned as vital intermediaries, delivering divine messages to kings, leaders, and the populace, often influencing political and military decisions. The act of "adjuring" someone "in the name of the LORD" was the most profound and legally binding oath one could take, invoking the authority and potential judgment of the covenant God of Israel upon any falsehood. It represented an appeal to the highest spiritual authority, emphasizing the extreme gravity of the expected truth. Ramoth-gilead, the contested city, was a strategically crucial location in Transjordan, frequently a point of contention between Israel and the Aramean kingdom (Syria).

* **Key Themes:** This narrative profoundly illustrates several enduring theological and narrative themes. Firstly, it highlights **The Inescapable Pursuit of Truth**, even by those who habitually reject it. Ahab's desperate demand, despite his deep-seated wickedness, reveals an inherent human need for genuine truth, particularly when facing momentous, life-or-death decisions, even if that truth directly contradicts his desired outcomes. Secondly, **Prophetic Integrity and Courage** are central to Micaiah's character. He stands as a singular figure of unwavering conviction against 400 compliant false prophets and immense royal pressure, choosing to deliver God's unadulterated message regardless of personal cost or popular opinion. His courage to speak divine truth to earthly power serves as an exemplary model for all who would faithfully represent God. Thirdly, the passage underscores **The Sacredness and Authority of God's Name**. By adjuring Micaiah "in the name of the LORD," Ahab invokes the most solemn oath available, emphasizing the gravity and divine authority expected from a true prophet of Yahweh. This act highlights the profound seriousness of invoking the divine name for truth-telling and the expectation that a true prophet would speak only what God commanded, not what humans desired. Finally, the narrative serves as a stark and timeless lesson in **Discerning True vs. False Prophecy**. The 400 false prophets offered comforting flattery that aligned with the king's desires, while Micaiah delivered a challenging, yet ultimately true, word from God. This stark contrast vividly demonstrates the profound difference between genuine divine revelation and self-serving or politically motivated pronouncements, a theme echoed in passages like [Jeremiah 14:14](/jeremiah/14-14 "Jeremiah 14:14 - False Prophets Speak Lies") and [Jeremiah 23:28-32](/jeremiah/23-28-32 "Jeremiah 23:28-32 - True vs. False Prophets").

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
#### Key Word Analysis
* **Adjure (Hebrew, _shâbaʻ'_):** This verb (H7650, שָׁבַע, _shâbaʻ'_) means "to swear (as if by repeating a declaration seven times); to take an oath, to cause to swear." In this context, it signifies a solemn and binding appeal, akin to placing someone under the most serious spiritual obligation. Ahab is not merely asking for information; he is demanding a truthful response under the weight of divine authority, compelling Micaiah to speak with full, unreserved honesty, as if bound by an unbreakable oath.
* **Truth (Hebrew, _ʼemeth'_):** The Hebrew word for "truth" (H571, אֱמֶת, _ʼemeth'_) denotes more than mere factual accuracy; it encompasses stability, certainty, trustworthiness, and reality. It refers to a word that is consistent with God's character and will, a message that can be relied upon because it originates from the ultimate source of faithfulness. Ahab is not just seeking a correct prediction, but a divinely authoritative word, one that stands in stark contrast to the deceptive words of his 400 prophets.
* **LORD (Hebrew, _Yᵉhôvâh'_):** This term (H3068, יְהוָה, _Yᵉhôvâh'_) refers to the self-Existent or Eternal God, Jehovah, the Jewish national name of God. When invoked "in the name of the LORD" (which includes H8034, שֵׁם, _shêm',_ for "name"), it is a powerful invocation of God's personal, covenantal name. To speak or swear "in the name of the LORD" meant to do so under His supreme authority, with His backing, and with the understanding that He would hold the speaker accountable. It was the highest form of oath, signifying that the words spoken were not merely human opinion but divine revelation. Ahab's use of this phrase, despite his idolatry, highlights his desperate recognition of the unique authority associated with the true God's name, especially in prophetic utterance.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"And the king said to him":** This opening clause immediately establishes the direct interaction between King Ahab and the prophet Micaiah. It sets the scene for a pivotal confrontation, emphasizing the power dynamic at play—royal authority confronting prophetic integrity. Ahab's tone, implied by the subsequent rhetorical question, is one of mounting frustration and a desperate desire to elicit a straightforward answer from Micaiah.
* **"How many times shall I adjure thee":** This rhetorical question powerfully conveys Ahab's exasperation and the repeated nature of his attempts to compel Micaiah to speak plainly. It suggests a history of Micaiah's evasiveness or Ahab's persistent efforts to extract a desired prophecy, highlighting the king's growing impatience and his determination to receive a "real" answer. It underscores the king's recognition that Micaiah's previous responses were not genuine.
* **"that thou say nothing but the truth to me":** This clause articulates the core of Ahab's demand: unvarnished, unmanipulated truth. He is weary of Micaiah's sarcasm or veiled responses and desires a clear, unambiguous prophetic word that is not influenced by political expediency or personal feelings, but is genuinely from God. This demand for "nothing but the truth" stands in stark contrast to the flattering falsehoods delivered by the 400 court prophets.
* **"in the name of the LORD?":** This concluding phrase is the most critical element of the verse. It signifies the profound solemnity and binding nature of Ahab's adjuration. By invoking the divine name, Ahab places Micaiah under the highest possible spiritual obligation, demanding that he speak as a true messenger of Yahweh, with all the authority and accountability that entails. It is a desperate appeal to a divine standard that Ahab himself largely ignored in his life, revealing a fleeting recognition of the true God's ultimate authority.

#### Literary Devices
The verse is rich with several potent literary devices that amplify its meaning and impact. **Irony** is profoundly evident, as Ahab, a king notorious for his consistent idolatry and rejection of Yahweh, now desperately demands truth "in the name of the LORD." This highlights his hypocrisy and the inherent, perhaps subconscious, human need for divine truth, even when one actively suppresses or denies it. **Dramatic Tension** is palpable, skillfully built through Ahab's exasperated rhetorical question ("How many times shall I adjure thee?") and Micaiah's preceding sarcastic response, which necessitates this solemn adjuration. The scene functions as a verbal duel, a clash between royal power seeking control and prophetic authority submitting only to God. The verse also employs powerful **Contrast**, setting Ahab's desperate demand for divine truth against the backdrop of the 400 false prophets who had just delivered a message of human-pleasing lies. This contrast underscores the unique nature, authority, and often uncomfortable reality of true prophecy. Furthermore, the scene subtly **Foreshadows** the dire consequences of rejecting God's truth, as Micaiah's subsequent, divinely revealed prophecy will directly lead to Ahab's death in battle.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
This verse powerfully illuminates the nature of divine truth and the complex human response to it. God, as the ultimate source of all reality, faithfulness, and unwavering truth, desires His truth to be spoken, heard, and received. Ahab's desperate plea, even from a heart steeped in idolatry and rebellion, reveals an inherent human recognition of the profound weight and necessity of genuine divine revelation, especially in moments of existential crisis. It underscores that truth from God is often uncomfortable, challenging human desires, exposing sin, and overturning meticulously crafted plans, yet it is ultimately the path to true understanding and, potentially, salvation. The narrative serves as a timeless reminder that God's word, faithfully delivered through His true messengers, stands in stark contrast to human flattery, self-serving pronouncements, or politically motivated lies, always demanding a response of faith, obedience, or outright rejection.

* [Deuteronomy 18:20-22](/deuteronomy/18-20-22 "Deuteronomy 18:20-22 - Testing a Prophet's Authenticity")
* [Jeremiah 23:28-32](/jeremiah/23-28-32 "Jeremiah 23:28-32 - Distinguishing True from False Prophets")
* [John 8:44-47](/john/8-44-47 "John 8:44-47 - Jesus on Truth and Lies")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The intense scene in [2 Chronicles 18:15](/2_chronicles/18-15 "2 Chronicles 18:15 - Ahab's Demand for Truth") offers profound and enduring lessons for contemporary believers. Like King Ahab, we are often tempted to seek God's truth only when it aligns with our preconceived plans, offers comfort, or validates our desires. Yet, genuine spiritual growth, profound discernment, and true freedom come from humbly embracing God's unvarnished word, even—and especially—when it challenges our assumptions, exposes our sin, or calls us to difficult, counter-cultural paths. This verse compels us to cultivate a deep hunger for authentic divine revelation, rather than settling for palatable platitudes or self-affirming messages. It also calls us to exercise rigorous discernment in the spiritual counsel we receive, critically asking whether it genuinely aligns with God's revealed will or merely caters to our desires, biases, or the prevailing cultural winds. Furthermore, Micaiah's unwavering courage in the face of immense pressure serves as a powerful and timeless model. In a world that often pressures conformity and compromise, believers are called to speak God's truth with integrity, conviction, and love, even when it is unpopular, carries personal risk, or invites opposition. This requires a profound reliance on the Holy Spirit's empowerment and an unshakeable commitment to God's word above all human opinions, political pressures, or personal fears.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **In what areas of my life am I tempted to seek comfortable lies or convenient half-truths rather than challenging, transformative truths from God?**
* **How do I actively discern between genuine spiritual counsel that is rooted in God's Word and advice that merely caters to my desires or biases?**
* **What might it look like for me to speak God's truth with courage and integrity in my current spheres of influence, even when it is unpopular or carries personal cost?**
* **How does my reverence for "the name of the LORD" impact my commitment to radical truthfulness and integrity in my own words and actions?**

### FAQ
**Why did Ahab demand truth "in the name of the LORD" if he was a wicked king?**

Answer: Ahab's demand for truth "in the name of the LORD" is deeply ironic and paradoxical, given his consistent idolatry and rebellion against Yahweh throughout his reign. However, it highlights several significant possibilities. First, even a wicked king like Ahab understood the profound weight, authority, and binding nature associated with invoking the name of the covenant God of Israel. In a moment of existential crisis, facing a life-or-death decision, he instinctively turned to the highest known authority for a reliable word, recognizing that the 400 false prophets, while pleasing, ultimately lacked true divine backing or accountability. Second, it could reflect a cultural formality; swearing by a deity was a common practice in the ancient Near East, and even if he rejected Yahweh personally, he knew that a prophet of Yahweh would be bound by this specific, most solemn oath. Third, it might reveal a desperate, albeit fleeting, moment of spiritual honesty or a subconscious acknowledgment of God's ultimate sovereignty, where he truly wanted to know the divine will, even if he ultimately intended to disregard it. This moment powerfully underscores the inescapable reality of God's authority and the inherent human need for divine truth, even for those who actively reject Him.

**What was Micaiah's initial sarcastic response that prompted Ahab's demand?**

Answer: When first brought before the kings, Micaiah was asked if they should proceed to battle against Ramoth-gilead. He initially responded, "Go ye up, and prosper; for the LORD shall deliver it into the hand of the king" ([2 Chronicles 18:14](/2_chronicles/18-14 "2 Chronicles 18:14 - Micaiah's Initial Sarcasm")). This statement was a direct, word-for-word echo of the unanimous message delivered by the 400 false prophets ([2 Chronicles 18:5](/2_chronicles/18-5 "2 Chronicles 18:5 - The 400 False Prophets' Prophecy")). However, Micaiah's tone, manner, and perhaps a subtle smirk, must have conveyed profound sarcasm or irony, indicating that he was not speaking genuinely. He was effectively mocking the false prophets and, more importantly, forcing Ahab to acknowledge that he knew Micaiah possessed a different, true word to deliver. Ahab's subsequent exasperated adjuration confirms that he recognized Micaiah's initial statement as disingenuous and was pressing for the actual, divinely revealed truth, regardless of how unwelcome it might be.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The desperate plea of King Ahab for "nothing but the truth... in the name of the LORD" in [2 Chronicles 18:15](/2_chronicles/18-15 "2 Chronicles 18:15 - Ahab's Demand for Truth") finds its ultimate fulfillment and resolution in the person and work of Jesus Christ. Humanity, in its fallen state, often seeks comfort in lies, partial truths, or self-serving narratives, much like Ahab preferred the flattering words of the 400 false prophets. Yet, deep within the human spirit, there remains an innate, albeit often suppressed, longing for genuine, unadulterated truth. Jesus declares, "I am the way, the **truth**, and the life" ([John 14:6](/john/14-6 "John 14:6 - Jesus is the Way, Truth, and Life")). He is not merely a prophet who speaks truth on God's behalf; He is the very embodiment of truth, the eternal Word made flesh ([John 1:14](/john/1-14 "John 1:14 - The Word Became Flesh")). Unlike Micaiah, who had to be adjured to speak the truth, Jesus always spoke the Father's words perfectly, without reservation, and with absolute authority, because He and the Father are one ([John 10:30](/john/10-30 "John 10:30 - Jesus and the Father are One")). He is the ultimate Prophet, delivering God's final and complete revelation to humanity ([Hebrews 1:1-2](/hebrews/1-1-2 "Hebrews 1:1-2 - God's Final Word in Christ")). The truth He brings is not just information about the future, but a liberating reality that sets us free from the bondage of sin and spiritual blindness ([John 8:32](/john/8-32 "John 8:32 - The Truth Sets You Free")). In Christ, the desperate human search for truth "in the name of the LORD" is fully and eternally satisfied, for He is the faithful and true witness ([Revelation 3:14](/revelation/3-14 "Revelation 3:14 - The Faithful and True Witness")), through whom God's ultimate truth, salvation, and eternal life are revealed.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Acts 19:13

¶ Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, took upon them to call over them which had evil spirits the name of the Lord Jesus, saying, We adjure you by Jesus whom Paul preacheth.

Matthew 26:63

But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.

Mark 5:7

And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, [thou] Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.

1 Kings 22:16

And the king said unto him, How many times shall I adjure thee that thou tell me nothing but [that which is] true in the name of the LORD?

1 Samuel 14:24

¶ And the men of Israel were distressed that day: for Saul had adjured the people, saying, Cursed [be] the man that eateth [any] food until evening, that I may be avenged on mine enemies. So none of the people tasted [any] food.