Skip to content

Joshua 13:32

“Summary of Transjordan Inheritance”· Joshua 13:32–33Read in context
King James Version
These are the countries which Moses did distribute for inheritance in the plains of Moab, on the other side Jordan, by Jericho, eastward.
KJV (with Strong's)
These are the countries which Moses H4872 did distribute for inheritance H5157 in the plains H6160 of Moab H4124, on the other side H5676 Jordan H3383, by Jericho H3405, eastward H4217.
Complete Jewish Bible
These are the inheritances which Moshe distributed in the plains of Mo'av, beyond the Yarden and Yericho, eastward.
Berean Standard Bible
These were the portions Moses had given them on the plains of Moab beyond the Jordan, east of Jericho.
American Standard Version
These are the inheritances which Moses distributed in the plains of Moab, beyond the Jordan at Jericho, eastward.
World English Bible Messianic
These are the inheritances which Moses distributed in the plains of Moab, beyond the Jordan at Jericho, eastward.
Geneva Bible (1599)
These are the heritages, which Moses did distribute in the plaine of Moab beyond Iorden, toward Iericho Eastward.
Young's Literal Translation
These are they whom Moses caused to inherit in the plains of Moab, beyond the Jordan, by Jericho, eastward;
Translation
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,187 of 31,102 · 19.9%

Study this verse

Summary

Joshua 13:32 serves as a pivotal concluding statement for the initial phase of Israel's land inheritance. It meticulously records the territories east of the Jordan River, specifically allotted by Moses to the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh. This verse not only demarcates geographical boundaries but also underscores the divine authority and continuity of God's covenant promises regarding the Promised Land, highlighting Moses' foundational role in the distribution process before Joshua's leadership in Canaan proper.

Context

Literary Context

This verse functions as a precise concluding summary for the preceding section of Joshua (Joshua 13:8-31), which exhaustively enumerates the boundaries and cities of the tribal inheritances situated east of the Jordan River. Its placement is deliberate, serving to clearly delineate this initial phase of land distribution, attributing it explicitly to Moses. This effectively distinguishes it from the subsequent divisions overseen by Joshua for the tribes west of the Jordan (Joshua 14-19). This literary demarcation provides both chronological clarity and authoritative attribution, signaling the completion of a significant aspect of the land allocation before the narrative transitions to the remaining territories under Joshua's direct supervision.

Historical & Cultural Context

The distribution of these Transjordanian lands occurred prior to Israel's crossing of the Jordan River into Canaan. The "plains of Moab" (as referenced in Numbers 22:1) refers to the specific region east of the Jordan, opposite Jericho, where the Israelites encamped before their entry into the Promised Land. Culturally, the act of distributing land was a profoundly significant event, fulfilling ancient promises and establishing the foundational tribal identities and permanent boundaries for the Israelite nation. The phrase "on the other side Jordan" (Hebrew: ʻêber hayYarden), from the perspective of the narrative which often looks back from the west bank, unequivocally refers to the land east of the river. The specific mention of "by Jericho, eastward" further clarifies the geographical orientation, using Jericho (a key landmark on the west bank) as a fixed point of reference to precisely define the location of these eastern inheritances.

Key Themes

This verse powerfully reinforces the theme of Divine Faithfulness, as God meticulously fulfills His ancient promises to Abraham (e.g., Genesis 12:7; Genesis 15:18-21) by granting land to His people. It also highlights Covenant Continuity, demonstrating that God's plan for Israel's inheritance transcends individual leadership, flowing seamlessly from Moses to Joshua. Furthermore, it underscores the Orderly Nature of God's Provision, as the meticulous detailing of boundaries throughout Joshua 13, summarized by this verse, reflects a divine preference for clear, defined inheritances. This precision ensured peace and prevented future disputes over territory, a theme consistently emphasized throughout the land distribution accounts in Joshua 13-19.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Distribute nâchal' H5157

This verb (H5157), often translated as "to inherit," "to possess," or "to apportion as an inheritance," signifies the act of granting a permanent, divinely sanctioned possession. In this context, it emphasizes that the land was not merely conquered but divinely allotted as an enduring heritage, underscoring the theological significance of the land as a gift from God, a fulfillment of His covenant.

Plains ʻărâbâh' H6160

This specific term (H6160) refers to the arid rift valley of the Jordan, a distinct geographical region. Its mention precisely locates the distribution in the low-lying, often barren, area along the Jordan River, historically significant as the final encampment of Israel before entering Canaan. This geographical specificity reinforces the historical accuracy and tangible nature of the inheritance.

Eastward mizrâch' H4217

This noun (H4217), derived from a verb meaning "to rise" (like the sun), denotes direction, specifically "sunrise" or "the east." When used with "by Jericho," it unequivocally specifies the geographical position of these inheritances relative to the prominent city on the west bank, confirming their Transjordanian location with precise directional clarity.

Verse Breakdown

"These [are the countries] which Moses did distribute for inheritance"

This opening clause firmly establishes the subject of the verse as the previously enumerated territories (Joshua 13:8-31). Crucially, it attributes the authority and act of distribution to Moses, not Joshua, emphasizing the pre-Jordan crossing phase of land allocation. The phrase "for inheritance" (nahalah) signifies a permanent, divinely given possession, not a temporary conquest, highlighting God's covenant faithfulness and the enduring nature of His gift.

"in the plains of Moab"

This phrase precisely situates the geographical context of Moses' distribution. The "plains of Moab" ('aravoth Mo'av) refers to the specific area east of the Jordan River, opposite Jericho, where Israel encamped before crossing into Canaan (Numbers 22:1). This detail anchors the historical event to a known and significant location in Israel's wilderness journey, marking the final stage before the conquest.

"on the other side Jordan, by Jericho, eastward."

This final phrase provides a crucial geographical orientation, leaving no ambiguity about the territories in view. "On the other side Jordan" ('ever hayYarden), from the perspective of those later in Canaan, refers to the land east of the river. The reference "by Jericho" (a prominent city on the west bank) serves as a fixed point of reference, with "eastward" confirming the direction of the distributed lands relative to Jericho. This tripartite geographical marker underscores the tangible reality and precise boundaries of the inheritance.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in this verse is Precision in Geographical Description. The repeated and specific geographical markers—"plains of Moab," "on the other side Jordan," "by Jericho," and "eastward"—serve to meticulously define the boundaries and location of the distributed lands. This precision is not merely for factual reporting but reinforces the Veracity and Fulfillment of God's promises. It highlights the tangible reality of the inheritance, demonstrating that God's covenant promises are concrete and geographically verifiable. The verse also functions as a Summary Statement, bringing authoritative closure to the preceding detailed lists and providing an explicit attribution of the distribution to Moses, a common literary technique in historical narratives to mark transitions or conclude significant sections.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Joshua 13:32, though seemingly an administrative detail, profoundly underscores God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. It demonstrates that the land inheritance was not a human achievement but a divine gift, meticulously planned and executed across generations of leadership. This continuity from Moses to Joshua highlights God's overarching sovereignty and His commitment to bringing His redemptive purposes to fruition for His people. The precise allocation of land also speaks to God's orderly nature and His desire for His people to live in peace and security within their divinely appointed spheres, ensuring clear boundaries and preventing future conflict, reflecting His wisdom in governance.

Reflection and Application

This verse, while historical, resonates deeply with timeless spiritual truths. It reminds us that God is a God of order, precision, and faithfulness, meticulously working out His plans even across generations and changes in leadership. Just as the Israelites received a tangible inheritance, believers today are promised an eternal inheritance, not of land, but of spiritual blessings and a future with God. The continuity from Moses to Joshua teaches us the importance of building upon the foundations laid by those who came before us, honoring their contributions while pressing forward in God's ongoing work. It encourages us to trust in God's sovereign plan, knowing that His promises are sure and His provisions are always precise, even when the path ahead seems uncertain. We are called to live in the reality of our spiritual inheritance, knowing that our ultimate dwelling is secured by God's unchanging character and His unfailing love.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the continuity of leadership from Moses to Joshua, as highlighted in this verse, inform our understanding of God's work through different generations of leaders today?
  2. In what ways does the meticulous detailing of land distribution reflect God's character, and how can we apply this understanding to our own lives, seeking order and precision in our stewardship?
  3. What "inheritance" has God promised to you as a believer, and how does the faithfulness demonstrated in Joshua 13:32 encourage your trust in Him for its fulfillment?

FAQ

Why is it important that Moses, not Joshua, distributed this land?

It is crucial because it establishes the continuity and divine authority of the land distribution process. Moses' role in allocating the Transjordanian territories (to Reuben, Gad, and half-Manasseh) predates the crossing of the Jordan and Joshua's leadership in Canaan proper. This highlights that the entire land inheritance was part of God's unified plan, initiated by Moses under divine command (as seen in Numbers 32:33) and seamlessly continued by Joshua. It demonstrates that God's covenant promises are fulfilled consistently, regardless of the specific human leader, underscoring God's overarching sovereignty and faithfulness to His word. It also sets a precedent for the subsequent divisions, affirming that the land was always God's to give.

What does "on the other side Jordan, by Jericho, eastward" mean geographically?

This phrase precisely locates the distributed territories. "On the other side Jordan" (Hebrew: ʻêber hayYarden) refers to the land east of the Jordan River. While this phrase can sometimes mean west of the Jordan depending on the speaker's perspective, in the context of Joshua, particularly after the Israelites have crossed the Jordan, it consistently refers to the Transjordanian region. The addition of "by Jericho" (a prominent city on the west bank of the Jordan, central to the narrative of Israel's entry into Canaan, as in Joshua 6) and "eastward" (relative to Jericho) leaves no doubt that these are the lands situated directly opposite Jericho, on the eastern side of the river. This geographical specificity underscores the tangible fulfillment of God's promise of land and the precise nature of His provision for His people.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Joshua 13:32, detailing the earthly inheritance distributed by Moses, subtly points to the greater, spiritual inheritance secured by Christ. Just as Moses, a foundational lawgiver and mediator, prepared the way for Israel's entry into the Promised Land by distributing initial portions, so too did the Law and Prophets, culminating in John the Baptist, prepare the way for Jesus, who is the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises. Our true inheritance is not a physical territory but a spiritual reality in Christ (as highlighted in Ephesians 1:11), secured through His atoning sacrifice and resurrection. He is the true Joshua (Jesus, meaning "Yahweh saves"), who leads His people into their eternal rest and inheritance (a concept richly developed in Hebrews 4:8-11). The meticulous order of the land distribution foreshadows the divine precision with which God has "blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places" (Ephesians 1:3), guaranteeing our future in the "new heavens and a new earth" (Revelation 21:1) where righteousness dwells. Through Christ, we receive an "inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4), a far greater and more enduring possession than any earthly territory, ensuring that God's promises to His people are eternally fulfilled in Him.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Joshua 13:7–33. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 27 verses
Passage under commentJoshua 13:7–33
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here we have, I. Orders given to Joshua to assign to each tribe its portion of this land, including that which was yet unsubdued, which must be brought into the lot, in a believing confidence that it should be conquered when Israel was multiplied so as to have occasion for it (Jos 13:7): Now divide this land. Joshua thought all must be conquered before any must be divided. "No," said, God, "there is as much conquered as will serve your turn for the present; divide this, and make your best of it, and wait for the remainder hereafter." Note, We must take the comfort of what we have, though we cannot compass all we would have. Observe,

1.The land must be divided among the several tribes, and they must not always live in common, as now they did. Which way soever a just property is acquired, it is the will of that God who has given the earth to the children of men that there should be such a thing, and that every man should know his own, and not invade that which is another's. The world must be governed, not by force, but right, by the law of equity, not of arms.

2.That it must be divided for an inheritance, though they got it by conquest.

(1.)The promise of it came to them as an inheritance from their fathers; the land of promise pertained to the children of promise, who were thus beloved for their fathers' sakes, and in performance of the covenant with them.

(2.)The possession of it was to be transmitted by them, as an inheritance to their children. Frequently, what is got by force is soon lost again; but Israel, having an incontestable title to this land by the divine grant, might see it hereby secured as an inheritance to their seed after them, and that God kept this mercy for thousands.

3.That Joshua must not divide it by his own will. Though he was a very wise, just, and good man, it must not be left to him to give what he pleased to each tribe; but he must do it by lot, which referred the matter wholly to God, and to his determination, for he it is that appoints the bounds of our habitation, and every man's judgment must proceed from him. But Joshua must preside in this affair, must manage this solemn appeal to Providence, and see that the lot was drawn fairly and without fraud, and that every tribe did acquiesce in it. The lot indeed causeth contention to cease, Pro 18:18. But, if upon this lot any controversy should arise, Joshua by his wisdom and authority must determine it, and prevent any ill consequences of it. Joshua must have the honour of dividing the land,

(1.)Because he had undergone the fatigue of conquering it: and when, through his hand, each tribe received its allotment, they would thereby be made the more sensible of their obligations to him. And what a pleasure must it needs be to a man of such a public spirit as Joshua was to see the people that were so dear to him eating of the labour of his hands!

(2.)That he might be herein a type of Christ, who has not only conquered for us the gates of hell, but has opened to us the gates of heaven, and, having purchased the eternal inheritance for all believers, will in due time put them all in possession of it.

II.An account is here given of the distribution of the land on the other side Jordan among the Reubenites, and Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh. Observe,

1.How this account is introduced. It comes in,

(1.)As the reason why this land within Jordan must be divided only to the nine tribes and a half, because the other two and a half were already provided for.

(2.)As a pattern to Joshua in the work he had now to do. He had seen Moses distribute that land, which would give him some aid in distributing this, and thence he might take his measure; only this was to be done by lot, but it should seem Moses did that himself, according to the wisdom given unto him.

(3.)As an inducement to Joshua to hasten the dividing of this land, that the nine tribes and a half might not be kept any longer than was necessary out of their possession, since their brethren of the two tribes and a half were so well settled in theirs; and God their common Father would not have such a difference made between his children.

2.The particulars of this account.

(1.)Here is a general description of the country that was given to the two tribes and a half, which Moses gave them, even as Moses gave them, Jos 13:8. The repetition implies a ratification of the grant by Joshua. Moses settled this matter, and, as Moses settled it, so shall it rest; Joshua will not, under any pretence whatsoever, go about to alter it. And a reason is intimated why he would not, because Moses was the servant of the Lord, and acted in this matter by secret direction from him and was faithful as a servant. Here we have,

[1.]The fixing of the boundaries of this country, by which they were divided from the neighbouring nations, Jos 13:9, etc. Israel must know their own and keep to it, and may not, under pretence of their being God's peculiar people, encroach upon their neighbours, and invade their rights and properties, to which they had a good and firm title by providence, though not, as Israel, a title by promise.

[2.]An exception of one part of this country from Israel's possession, though it was in their grant, namely, the Geshurites and the Maachathites, Jos 13:13. They had not leisure to reduce all the remote and obscure corners of the country in Moses's time, and afterwards they had no mind to it, being easy with what they had. Thus those who are not straitened in God's promises are yet straitened in their own faith, and prayers, and endeavours.

(2.)A very particular account of the inheritances of these two tribes and a half, how they were separated from each other, and what cites, with the towns, villages, and fields, commonly known and reputed to be appurtenances to them, belonged to each tribe. This is very fully and exactly set down in order that posterity might, in reading this history, be the more affected with the goodness of God to their ancestors, when they found what a large and fruitful country, and what abundance of great and famous cities, he put them in possession of (God's grants look best when we descend to the particulars); and also that the limits of every tribe being punctually set down in this authentic record disputes might be prevented, and such contests between the tribes as commonly happen where boundaries have not been adjusted nor this matter brought to a certainty. And we have reason to think that the register here prescribed and published of the lot of each tribe was of great use to Israel in after-ages, was often appealed to, and always acquiesced in, for the determining of meum and tuum - mine and thine.

[1.]We have here the lot of the tribe of Reuben, Jacob's first-born, who, though he had lost the dignity and power which pertained to the birthright, yet, it seems, had the advantage of being first served. Perhaps those of that tribe had an eye to this in desiring to be seated on that side Jordan, that, since they could not expect the benefit of the best lot, they might have the credit of the first. Observe, First, In the account of the lot of this tribe mention is made of the slaughter, 1. Of Sihon, king of the Amorites, who reigned in this country, and might have kept it and his life if he would have been neighbourly, and have suffered Israel to pass through his territories, but, by attempting to oppose them, justly brought ruin upon himself, Num 21:21, etc. 2. Of the princes of Midian, who were slain afterwards in another war (Num 31:8), and yet are here called dukes of Sihon, and are said to be smitten with him, because they were either tributaries to him, or, in his opposition to Israel, confederates with him, and hearty in his interests, and his fall made way for theirs not long after. 3. Of Balaam particularly, that would, if he could, have cursed Israel, and was soon after recompensed according to the wickedness of his endeavour (Psa 28:4), for he fell with those that set him on. This was recorded before (Num 31:8), and is here repeated, because the defeating of Balaam's purpose to curse Israel was the turning of that curse into a blessing, and was such an instance of the power and goodness of God as was fit to be had in everlasting remembrance. See Mic 6:5. Secondly, Within the lot of this tribe was that Mount Pisgah from the top of which Moses took his view of the earthly Canaan and his flight to the heavenly. And not far off thence Elijah was when he was fetched up to heaven in a chariot of fire. The separation of this tribe from the rest, by the river Jordan, was that which Deborah lamented; and the preference they gave to their private interests above the public was what she censured, Jdg 5:15, Jdg 5:16. In this tribe lay Heshbon and Sibmah, famed for their fruitful fields and vineyards. See Isa 16:8, Isa 16:9; Jer 48:32. This tribe, with that of Gad, was sorely shaken by Hazael king of Syria (Kg2 10:33), and afterwards dislodged and carried into captivity, twenty years before the general captivity of the ten tribes by the king of Assyria, Ch1 5:26.

[2.]The lot of the tribe of Gad, Jos 13:24-28. This lay north of Reuben's lot; the country of Gilead lay in this tribe, so famous for its balm that it is thought strange indeed if there be no balm in Gilead, and the cities of Jabesh-Gilead and Ramoth-Gilead which we often read of in scripture. Succoth and Penuel, which we read of in the story of Gideon, were in this tribe; and that forest which is called the wood of Ephraim (from the slaughter Jephthah made there of the Ephraimites), in which Absalom's rebellious army was beaten, while his father David lay at Mahanaim, one of the frontier-cities of this tribe, Jos 13:26. Sharon, famous for roses, was in this tribe. And within the limits of this tribe lived those Gadarenes that loved their swine better than their Saviour, fitter to be called Girgashites than Israelites.

[3.]The lot of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Jos 13:29-31. Bashan, the kingdom of Og, was in this allotment, famous for the best timber, witness the oaks of Bashan - and the best breed of cattle, witness the bulls and rams of Bashan. This tribe lay north of Gad, reached to Mount Hermon, and had in it part of Gilead. Mispeh was in this half-tribe, and Jephthah was one of its ornaments; so was Elijah, for in this tribe was Thisbe, whence he is called the Tishbite; and Jair was another. In the edge of the tribe stood Chorazin, honoured with Christ's wondrous works, but ruined by his righteous woe for not improving them.

[4.]Twice in this chapter it is taken notice of that to the tribe of Levi Moses gave no inheritance (Jos 13:14, Jos 13:33), for so God had appointed, Num 18:20. If they had been appointed to a lot entire by themselves, Moses would have served them first, not because it was his own tribe, but because it was God's; but they must be provided for in another manner; their habitations must be scattered in all the tribes, and their maintenance brought out of all the tribes, and God himself was the portion both of their inheritance and of their cup, Deu 10:9; Deu 18:2.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 13:32 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8