TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 9:10–14.
What agreement was made between Solomon and Hiram, when the building-work was to be begun, we read before, ch. 5. Here we have an account of their fair and friendly parting when the work was done. 1. Hiram made good his bargain to the utmost. He had furnished Solomon with materials for his buildings, according to all his desire (Kg1 9:11), and with gold, Kg1 9:15. So far was he from envying Solomon's growing greatness and reputation, and being jealous of him, that he helped to magnify him. Solomon's power, with Solomon's wisdom, needs not be dreaded by any of his neighbours. God honours him; therefore Hiram will. 2. Solomon, no doubt, made good his bargain, and gave Hiram food for his household, as was agreed, Kg1 5:9. But here we are told that, over and above that, he gave him twenty cities (small ones we may suppose, like those mentioned here, Kg1 9:19) in the land of Galilee, Kg1 9:11. It should seem, these were not allotted to any of the tribes of Israel (for the border of Asher came up to them, Jos 19:27, which intimates that it did not include them), but continued in the hands of the natives till Solomon made himself master of them, and then made a present of them to Hiram. It becomes those that are great and good to be generous. Hiram came to see these cities, and did not like them (Kg1 9:12): They pleased him not. He called the country the land of Cabul, a Phoenician word (says Josephus) which signifies displeasing, Kg1 9:13. He therefore returned them to Solomon (as we find, Ch2 8:2), who repaired them, and then caused the children of Israel to inhabit them, which intimates that before they did not; but, when Solomon received back what he had given, no doubt he honourably gave Hiram an equivalent in something else. But what shall we think of this? Did Solomon act meanly in giving Hiram what was not worth his acceptance? Or was Hiram humoursome and hard to please? I am willing to believe it was neither the one nor the other. The country was truly valuable, and so were the cities in it, but not agreeable to Hiram's genius. The Tyrians were merchants, trading men, that lived in fine houses, and became rich by navigation, but knew not how to value a country that was fit for corn and pasture (that was business that lay out of their way); and therefore Hiram desired Solomon to take them again, he knew not what to do with them, and, if he would please to gratify him, let it be in his own element, by becoming his partner in trade, as we find he did, Kg1 9:27. Hiram, who was used to the clean streets of Tyre, could by no means agree with the miry lanes in the land of Cabul, whereas the best lands have commonly the worst roads through them. See how the providence of God suits both the accommodation of this earth to the various dispositions of men and the dispositions of men to the various accommodations of the earth, and all for the good of mankind in general. Some take delight in husbandry, and wonder what pleasure sailors can take on a rough sea; others take as much delight in navigation, and wonder what pleasure husbandmen can take in a dirty country, like the land of Cabul. It is so in many other instances, in which we may observe the wisdom of him whose all souls are and all lands.
Continue studying 1 Kings 9:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
First Kings 9:11 records a significant diplomatic and economic transaction between King Solomon of Israel and King Hiram of Tyre, where Solomon cedes twenty cities in the region of Galilee to Hiram. This transfer serves as a substantial payment for the vast quantities of cedar and fir timber, along with gold, that Hiram had faithfully supplied over a twenty-year period for the construction of the Jerusalem Temple and Solomon's royal palace. The verse highlights the culmination of Solomon's monumental building endeavors and the considerable financial and territorial implications of such grand projects, setting the stage for subsequent narrative developments regarding the nature and reception of this payment.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is strategically placed immediately following the completion of Solomon's extensive building program, which spanned two decades: seven years for the Temple (1 Kings 6:38) and thirteen years for his own palace complex (1 Kings 7:1). The preceding verse, 1 Kings 9:10, explicitly states the twenty-year duration, establishing the timeline for the obligation Solomon now fulfills. The alliance between Solomon and Hiram was initially forged in 1 Kings 5, detailing Hiram's agreement to provide materials and skilled labor in exchange for food provisions. Therefore, 1 Kings 9:11 marks the formal settlement of this long-standing debt, transitioning the narrative from construction achievements to the intricate diplomatic and economic consequences, particularly Hiram's unexpected reaction to the payment in 1 Kings 9:12-13.
Historical & Cultural Context
The relationship between the burgeoning Israelite kingdom under Solomon and the powerful Phoenician city-state of Tyre was a cornerstone of regional stability and economic prosperity during this era. Tyre, a prominent maritime trading power, controlled access to vital timber resources from the Lebanese mountains and possessed highly skilled artisans, particularly in stone masonry and metalwork. Conversely, Israel, primarily an agrarian society, had abundant agricultural produce. This symbiotic relationship, characterized by reciprocal agreements and treaties, was common in the ancient Near East, facilitating large-scale projects that no single nation could undertake alone. The payment of cities, rather than solely precious metals or goods, underscores the immense value of the materials provided and the strategic importance of land in the ancient world. Galilee, a fertile northern region bordering Phoenicia, held potential strategic and economic value for Tyre, possibly offering agricultural land or access to inland trade routes, though its ultimate worth to Hiram would become a point of contention.
Key Themes
The transaction in this verse encapsulates several significant themes within the book of 1 Kings. Firstly, it exemplifies International Alliance and Trade, showcasing Solomon's diplomatic acumen and Israel's integration into the broader regional economy through a sustained, mutually beneficial relationship with Tyre. Secondly, it starkly illustrates The Cost of Grandeur: Solomon's magnificent building projects, symbols of his divinely bestowed wisdom and wealth, came at a substantial price, demanding not only immense labor and materials but also significant territorial concessions. This highlights that even divinely sanctioned endeavors carry earthly costs. Thirdly, the verse addresses the Fulfillment of Agreements, as Solomon honors his long-standing obligation to Hiram. However, the subsequent narrative in 1 Kings 9:12-13 introduces the theme of Disappointment and Imperfect Human Dealings, revealing that even among powerful allies, human expectations and satisfaction can diverge. Finally, the specific mention of "the land of Galilee" carries a subtle Geographic Significance, foreshadowing its later prominence as a crucial region for prophetic activity and, ultimately, the primary locus of Jesus' earthly ministry, as highlighted in the New Testament (e.g., Matthew 4:15-17).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This verb (H5375) means "to lift" or "to bear," but in this context, it carries the nuance of providing or supplying in abundance. It emphasizes the continuous and comprehensive nature of Hiram's provision, indicating that he "lifted up" or "carried" the burden of supplying all the necessary materials for Solomon's projects. This highlights the immense scale of the resources involved and Hiram's faithful adherence to the covenant.
This noun (H2656) denotes pleasure, delight, or deep longing. When applied to Solomon's "desire," it signifies that Hiram provided everything Solomon could possibly want or need for his ambitious building plans, without reservation or limitation. This underscores the extraordinary extent of the materials supplied and the depth of the alliance, where Hiram sought to fulfill Solomon's every architectural and material aspiration.
This term (H5892), though singular in the Strong's entry, refers to "cities" in the plural in the verse. It denotes fortified settlements, implying not just undeveloped land but established communities with existing infrastructure, populations, and agricultural resources. The transfer of twenty such cities signifies a substantial territorial, demographic, and economic concession, emphasizing the magnitude of Solomon's debt and the significant value Hiram initially placed on such assets, even if he later found these specific cities unsatisfactory.
Verse Breakdown
"([Now] Hiram the king of Tyre had furnished Solomon with cedar trees and fir trees, and with gold, according to all his desire,)"
This parenthetical clause serves as a crucial explanatory backdrop and justification for Solomon's subsequent action. It meticulously details the extensive and long-term provision by King Hiram, emphasizing his unwavering commitment and the vast scale of materials—cedar, fir, and gold—supplied over the entire twenty-year building period. The phrase "according to all his desire" powerfully conveys the comprehensive and unreserved nature of Hiram's supply, indicating that he met every single one of Solomon's needs for the construction of the Temple and palace.
"that then king Solomon gave Hiram twenty cities in the land of Galilee."
This is the main clause, presenting Solomon's reciprocal action as a direct consequence of Hiram's extensive provision. The payment of twenty cities, rather than a mere monetary sum, underscores the immense economic value of the materials and services rendered by Hiram. The specific geographical designation, "the land of Galilee," establishes the precise location of this significant territorial transfer, a detail that becomes pivotal in the subsequent narrative as it sets the stage for Hiram's reaction to the quality of the given cities.
Literary Devices
The verse employs several effective literary devices to convey its message. The parenthetical structure at the beginning, "(Now Hiram... desire,)", serves as a concise yet comprehensive summary of Hiram's long-standing contribution, providing the necessary context and justification before the main action of Solomon's payment is presented. The phrase "according to all his desire" can be interpreted as hyperbole, emphasizing the extraordinary extent of Hiram's generosity and the seemingly limitless resources at Solomon's disposal, thereby highlighting the grandeur of the completed projects. The specific mention of "twenty cities in the land of Galilee" functions as foreshadowing, subtly hinting at the subsequent narrative of Hiram's dissatisfaction with these cities in 1 Kings 9:12-13. This introduces a note of human imperfection and the complexities inherent even in divinely blessed endeavors. Furthermore, the entire exchange—a material payment for material provision—demonstrates a clear pattern of reciprocity, a foundational principle in ancient Near Eastern treaties and a reflection of the covenantal relationship established between these two powerful kings.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This verse, while appearing to be a straightforward record of a commercial transaction, carries significant theological weight. It underscores the immense resources, human ingenuity, and international cooperation that were dedicated to the building of God's Temple—a project divinely sanctioned and blessed by Yahweh. Yet, it simultaneously highlights that even the most sacred undertakings require vast earthly wealth and intricate diplomatic relations. The verse implicitly raises questions about the cost of fulfilling divine mandates and the practicalities of governance for a king under God's authority. The subsequent narrative of Hiram's dissatisfaction with the payment subtly introduces the profound theological truth that human efforts and agreements, even when well-intentioned and divinely guided, often fall short of perfect satisfaction or complete harmony. This serves as a poignant reminder that true and lasting fulfillment ultimately transcends earthly transactions and human arrangements, pointing to a higher, spiritual economy.
Reflection and Application
The transaction detailed in 1 Kings 9:11 offers profound insights for contemporary life, reminding us that even the grandest and most spiritually significant endeavors, such as building a house for God, involve practicalities, immense costs, and complex human negotiations. It challenges us to critically evaluate the true price of our own ambitions and achievements, whether personal, professional, or communal. Are we willing to pay the full cost, not only in tangible resources but also in time, effort, and relational capital? The subsequent narrative of Hiram's dissatisfaction serves as a powerful reminder that not all agreements, even those between trusted allies, perfectly meet every expectation. This calls us to cultivate integrity, clear communication, and a spirit of grace in our dealings, recognizing that human relationships are inherently imperfect. It also encourages us to reflect on what truly satisfies—is it the accumulation of earthly possessions and power, or something more enduring and spiritually profound? Ultimately, it prompts us to consider where our true treasures lie and what constitutes genuine, lasting value.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Solomon give cities instead of gold or other goods?
Solomon's decision to give cities to Hiram likely stemmed from the sheer magnitude of the debt incurred for the vast quantities of cedar, fir, and gold supplied over two decades for his monumental building projects. While Solomon possessed immense wealth, the value of these materials and the craftsmanship would have been astronomical. Giving territory, specifically twenty established cities, represented a substantial transfer of assets that was perhaps more feasible or equitable than a direct gold payment of such scale. In the ancient world, land, including its agricultural output and the population within it (which could be taxed), was a primary form of wealth and a strategic asset. It is also plausible that this form of payment was a pre-arranged part of their long-term agreement, though the specific terms are not fully detailed in 1 Kings 5.
What was Hiram's reaction to receiving these cities?
Hiram's reaction, detailed in the very next verses, 1 Kings 9:12-13, was one of disappointment and dissatisfaction. When he came from Tyre to inspect the cities Solomon had given him, he was displeased, calling them "Cabul." This name, which sounds like the Hebrew word for "good-for-nothing" or "worthless," indicates that the cities were not of the quality, strategic value, or perhaps even geographical location he had anticipated or desired. Despite this initial displeasure, the strong alliance between the two kings remained intact, though the incident highlights the complexities and potential for unmet expectations in even the most significant diplomatic relationships.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The narrative of Solomon's grand building projects and the subsequent payment to Hiram, while a historical account, subtly points to the greater, eternal work of Christ. Solomon's magnificent Temple, built with the finest earthly materials and immense human effort, served as a temporary dwelling place for God's presence, a tangible shadow of a more profound spiritual reality. The immense cost, even to the point of ceding valuable territory, underscores the human effort and finite resources poured into establishing an earthly kingdom and a physical sanctuary. In stark contrast, Christ's work establishes an eternal, spiritual kingdom, not built with human hands or purchased with earthly cities, but through His own perfect and ultimate sacrifice on the cross. The "cost" of our redemption was paid not by Solomon's vast wealth or land, but by the precious blood of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world. Furthermore, while Solomon's payment to Hiram ultimately led to dissatisfaction and the naming of the region "Cabul" (worthless), God's covenant with humanity through Christ is one of perfect fulfillment and boundless grace. Through Christ, the "payment" for sin is fully satisfied, and we receive an inheritance that is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). The mention of "Galilee" is also profoundly significant, as this region, deemed "worthless" by Hiram, became the primary stage for Jesus' earthly ministry, where He began to proclaim the good news of the true, eternal kingdom, fulfilling ancient prophecy that "Galilee of the Gentiles" would see a great light (Matthew 4:15-17). Thus, the imperfect, costly, and ultimately unsatisfactory transactions of Solomon's earthly kingdom are transcended and perfected in the person and work of Jesus Christ, who truly furnishes us "according to all His desire" for our salvation, eternal glory, and an everlasting dwelling place with God.