1 Kings 15:28

KJV

Even in the third year of Asa king of Judah did Baasha slay him, and reigned in his stead.

KJV (with Strong's)

Even in the third {H7969} year {H8141} of Asa {H609} king {H4428} of Judah {H3063} did Baasha {H1201} slay {H4191} him, and reigned {H4427} in his stead.

Complete Jewish Bible

It was in the third year of Asa king of Y'hudah that Ba'sha killed Nadav and became king in his place.

Berean Standard Bible

In the third year of Asa’s reign over Judah, Baasha killed Nadab and reigned in his place.

American Standard Version

Even in the third year of Asa king of Judah did Baasha slay him, and reigned in his stead.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
1 Kings 15:28 meticulously records a pivotal and violent transfer of power in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, detailing the assassination of King Nadab by Baasha, a commander from the tribe of Issachar. This momentous event, precisely dated to the third year of Judah's King Asa, not only highlights the chronic instability and ruthless ambition that plagued Israel's early monarchy but also serves as a stark fulfillment of divine prophecy regarding the judgment against the house of Jeroboam I due to his profound idolatry and leading the nation into sin. It powerfully underscores God's sovereign oversight and unwavering justice, even amidst the most chaotic human wickedness and political turmoil.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse is strategically placed within a broader narrative that contrasts the reigns of kings in the divided monarchy. It immediately follows the brief and wicked two-year reign of Nadab, son of Jeroboam I (1 Kings 15:25-26), and precedes the detailed account of Baasha's subsequent actions, including his complete eradication of Jeroboam's lineage (1 Kings 15:29). The chapter meticulously tracks the parallel reigns of Asa in Judah and various tumultuous kings in Israel, emphasizing the stark difference between the relatively stable Davidic dynasty in the south and the volatile, coup-ridden successions in the north. Crucially, verse 28 explicitly presents Baasha's coup not merely as a political power grab but as the direct and undeniable fulfillment of the divine judgment pronounced by the prophet Ahijah against Jeroboam's house in [1 Kings 14:10-11](/1_kings/14-10-11 "1 Kings 14:10-11 - Ahijah's Prophecy Against Jeroboam"), underscoring the certainty of God's word and His active involvement in human history.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** The period depicted in 1 Kings 15 is set within the turbulent era of the divided monarchy, which commenced after the death of King Solomon. Unlike the Southern Kingdom of Judah, which maintained a continuous, divinely promised Davidic line, the Northern Kingdom of Israel lacked a stable, hereditary dynasty. This fundamental difference frequently led to military coups, assassinations, and rapid changes in leadership, as kings often ascended to power through force rather than legitimate succession. Baasha's act of slaying Nadab and then systematically eliminating all of Jeroboam's descendants (1 Kings 15:29) was a brutal but common practice in the ancient Near East, known as "damnatio memoriae," designed to prevent any future claims to the throne from the deposed dynasty. This violent method of securing power was a hallmark of Israel's early history, starkly contrasting with the more stable and enduring Davidic line in Judah, which continued through Asa's reign and beyond, highlighting the theological implications of covenant faithfulness.
* **Key Themes:** The events chronicled in [1 Kings 15](/1_kings/15 "1 Kings 15 - The Reigns of Asa, Nadab, and Baasha") powerfully illustrate several pervasive themes found throughout the Books of Kings. Foremost among these is the theme of **Divine Judgment and Prophecy Fulfillment**, as Baasha's ruthless act is explicitly presented as the direct execution of God's pronouncement against Jeroboam's idolatrous house. This demonstrates God's active sovereignty over human affairs and the unwavering certainty of His word, even when carried out by wicked human agents. Second, the narrative vividly portrays the **Instability and Violence of the Northern Kingdom**, revealing a monarchy perpetually plagued by internal strife, regicide, and a lack of legitimate, enduring succession, standing in stark contrast to the divinely promised stability of the Davidic line in Judah (cf. [2 Samuel 7:16](/2_samuel/7-16 "2 Samuel 7:16 - God's Eternal Covenant with David's House")). Finally, the chapter highlights **Human Ambition and Ruthlessness**, as Baasha seizes power through bloodshed, illustrating the corrupting influence of power when pursued apart from divine guidance and moral constraint.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **Baasha (Hebrew, _Baʻshâʼ'_):** From an unused root meaning "to stink" or "offensiveness," this name, H1201, ironically describes the man who becomes king through a bloody coup. While the name itself may not directly comment on his character, the context of his actions—assassinating the king and eradicating his lineage—certainly aligns with a sense of moral offensiveness. Baasha's rise to power is marked by violence and a disregard for established order, setting a tone for his own reign which would later be condemned by God.
* **slay (Hebrew, _mûwth'_):** The KJV "slay" translates the Hebrew root H4191, _mûwth_, a primitive root meaning "to die" or, causatively, "to kill." In this context, it is used in the causative sense, emphasizing that Baasha actively brought about Nadab's death. This is not a passive or accidental event but a deliberate, violent act of homicide, underscoring the brutal nature of the coup. The term highlights the finality and decisiveness of Nadab's demise, a direct fulfillment of the divine judgment against his father's house.
* **reigned (Hebrew, _mâlak'_):** The Hebrew root H4427, _mâlak_, means "to reign" or "to be king," and inceptively, "to ascend the throne." The use of this verb immediately following the act of slaying indicates a direct and immediate succession achieved through violence. Baasha's kingship is presented as a direct consequence of his usurpation, emphasizing the illegitimate and forceful nature of his claim to the throne. This contrasts sharply with the divinely sanctioned and hereditary succession within the Davidic line in Judah.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"Even in the third year of Asa king of Judah":** This initial clause provides a precise chronological marker, synchronizing the events in the Northern Kingdom of Israel with the reign of the contemporary king of the Southern Kingdom of Judah. This synchronism is a characteristic feature of the Books of Kings, allowing the reader to track the parallel histories of the two nations. It also subtly highlights the relative stability and longer duration of Asa's reign in Judah (which would last 41 years) in contrast to the rapid and violent changes in Israel.
* **"did Baasha slay him":** This is the core action of the verse, identifying the perpetrator and the victim. Baasha, previously introduced as the son of Ahijah, from the tribe of Issachar (1 Kings 15:27), is the agent of the assassination. The pronoun "him" refers to Nadab, the son and successor of Jeroboam I. This act is presented not merely as a political coup but as the direct fulfillment of the divine prophecy against Jeroboam's house, demonstrating God's sovereign hand in bringing judgment through human agents, even those driven by their own wicked ambition.
* **"and reigned in his stead":** This concluding clause states the immediate consequence of the assassination: Baasha's usurpation of the throne. The phrase "in his stead" explicitly emphasizes the direct replacement of Nadab by Baasha, solidifying the transfer of power through violence. This marks the abrupt end of the dynasty of Jeroboam and the beginning of a new, equally unstable, royal line in the Northern Kingdom of Israel.

#### Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices to convey its powerful message. **Conciseness** is evident in the direct, unadorned reporting of a momentous and violent event, allowing the stark facts to speak for themselves without elaborate description. This terse style is characteristic of the historical narrative in Kings, focusing on actions and their theological implications. **Foreshadowing** is present, as this violent coup establishes a recurring pattern of instability, regicide, and short-lived dynasties in the Northern Kingdom, which stands in stark contrast to the more stable and divinely ordained succession in Judah. The narrative implicitly uses **Juxtaposition** or **Contrast** by situating the turbulent reign of Nadab and the violent rise of Baasha within the chronological framework of Asa's reign in Judah. This contrast highlights the theological distinction between the two kingdoms: one plagued by sin and chaos, the other striving for covenant faithfulness and experiencing relative stability. Furthermore, there is a strong element of **Irony** in Baasha's actions: while he fulfills God's judgment against Jeroboam's house, he does so out of his own ambition and wickedness, not piety. The text later reveals that Baasha himself would commit similar sins to Jeroboam, ultimately incurring divine judgment upon his own house (1 Kings 16:1-4), demonstrating a cyclical pattern of sin and judgment.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
1 Kings 15:28 profoundly illustrates the principle of divine sovereignty over human affairs, even amidst the most chaotic and morally reprehensible acts. Baasha's violent usurpation of the throne, though undoubtedly driven by human ambition and ruthlessness, is presented as the direct fulfillment of God's prophetic word against Jeroboam's idolatrous dynasty. This demonstrates that God's justice is certain, His word is unfailing, and He actively intervenes in history to bring judgment upon those who lead His people into sin and rebellion. The chronic instability of the Northern Kingdom, marked by such frequent and bloody transitions of power, serves as a theological commentary on the devastating consequences of rejecting God's established order and pursuing self-serving leadership. It highlights the stark difference between a kingdom founded on human might and one rooted in divine covenant and faithfulness, emphasizing that true stability and blessing derive from obedience to God.

* [1 Kings 14:10-11](/1_kings/14-10-11 "1 Kings 14:10-11 - Prophecy of Ahijah Against Jeroboam's House")
* [1 Kings 16:1-4](/1_kings/16-1-4 "1 Kings 16:1-4 - Prophecy Against Baasha's House")
* [Hosea 8:4](/hosea/8-4 "Hosea 8:4 - Israel's Self-Appointed Kings")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The brief, stark account of Baasha's coup in 1 Kings 15:28 offers profound lessons for believers today, reminding us that even in the most tumultuous and seemingly chaotic human events—political upheavals, shifts in power, acts of violence—God remains absolutely sovereign. His overarching purposes are never thwarted by human wickedness; rather, He can even use the ambition and sin of individuals to bring about His righteous judgments and fulfill His infallible word. This truth should instill in us a deep and abiding trust in God's ultimate control, even when circumstances appear overwhelming, unjust, or beyond human comprehension. Furthermore, the narrative serves as a powerful warning against the corrupting influence of unchecked ambition and the devastating consequences of leading others astray through idolatry and disobedience. It calls us to examine our own hearts, ensuring that our pursuit of influence or power, whether in personal life, work, or ministry, is aligned with God's will and not driven by selfish motives. Our true stability, security, and hope are found not in fleeting earthly power structures, but in faithful obedience to the unchanging King of kings and His eternal kingdom.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does the precise fulfillment of prophecy in this verse strengthen your trust in God's word and His sovereign control over history, even amidst human sin?**
* **What parallels, if any, can you draw between the political instability and leadership struggles of ancient Israel and challenges facing leaders or nations in our contemporary world?**
* **In what specific ways might unchecked ambition manifest in your own life or community, and how can a deep focus on Christ's kingdom and His values counteract such tendencies?**
* **How does the theological contrast between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms' stability inform your understanding of the enduring importance of covenant faithfulness and obedience to God?**

### FAQ

**Who was Nadab and why was he slain?**

Answer: Nadab was the son and immediate successor of Jeroboam I, the first king of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, reigning for only two years (1 Kings 15:25). Like his father, Nadab "did evil in the sight of the LORD, and walked in the way of his father, and in his sin wherewith he made Israel to sin" (1 Kings 15:26), perpetuating the idolatry introduced by Jeroboam. He was slain by Baasha, a commander, during a siege of Gibbethon. His assassination was not merely a political coup but a direct fulfillment of the prophecy given by the prophet Ahijah against Jeroboam's house, declaring that his entire lineage would be cut off due to their grievous idolatry and leading Israel into sin (cf. [1 Kings 14:10-11](/1_kings/14-10-11 "1 Kings 14:10-11 - Ahijah's Prophecy")).

**How does this event fulfill prophecy?**

Answer: The slaying of Nadab by Baasha directly fulfills the severe prophecy delivered by the prophet Ahijah to Jeroboam's wife in [1 Kings 14:10-11](/1_kings/14-10-11 "1 Kings 14:10-11 - Prophecy Against Jeroboam's House"). God declared, "Behold, I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam every male, bond and free, in Israel, and will take away the remnant of the house of Jeroboam, as a man takes away dung, till it be all gone." He further specified that "Him that dieth of Jeroboam in the city shall the dogs eat; and him that dieth in the field shall the fowls of the air eat: for the LORD hath spoken it." Baasha's subsequent act of striking down all of Jeroboam's house, leaving none alive (1 Kings 15:29), precisely executed this divine judgment, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His word and His righteous response to profound sin.

**What was the significance of Asa's reign in Judah at this time?**

Answer: The mention of Asa's reign in Judah provides a crucial chronological and theological contrast within the narrative. While Israel was experiencing violent coups, regicide, and profound instability due to its kings' persistent idolatry and rejection of God's covenant, Judah, under King Asa, was undergoing a period of significant religious reform and relative stability. Asa "did that which was good and right in the eyes of the LORD his God" (1 Kings 15:11), actively removing idols, male cult prostitutes, and even deposing his own grandmother from her position for her idolatry (1 Kings 15:12-13). This juxtaposition powerfully highlights a key theological message of the Books of Kings: faithfulness to God brings blessing and stability to a nation and its leadership, while disobedience and idolatry inevitably lead to chaos, judgment, and the collapse of human-established power. The enduring Davidic covenant provided a foundational stability for Judah that was conspicuously absent in the Northern Kingdom.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The turbulent succession in 1 Kings 15:28, where human ambition, violence, and sin dictate the rise and fall of kings, powerfully underscores humanity's desperate need for a truly righteous, stable, and eternal King. The failure of Nadab's short, wicked reign and Baasha's bloody ascent to power reveal the inherent brokenness, transience, and instability of earthly kingdoms established by human might and flawed leadership. This constant cycle of sin, judgment, and political upheaval in ancient Israel points forward with profound theological significance to the ultimate, perfect King, Jesus Christ. Unlike the kings of Israel who were prone to idolatry and consistently led their people astray, Jesus, the true Son of David, reigns in perfect righteousness and establishes a kingdom that "shall have no end" ([Luke 1:33](/luke/1-33 "Luke 1:33 - Jesus' Eternal Kingdom")). His kingship is not seized through violence or human maneuvering but is inaugurated through His willing self-sacrifice on the cross, where He conquered sin, death, and all opposing powers ([Colossians 2:15](/colossians/2-15 "Colossians 2:15 - Christ's Triumph Over Powers")). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world ([John 1:29](/john/1-29 "John 1:29 - Jesus, the Lamb of God")), and His reign brings true peace, eternal justice, and unshakable stability, fulfilling all the promises of God for a perfect ruler and a lasting kingdom ([Revelation 11:15](/revelation/11-15 "Revelation 11:15 - The Kingdom of the World Becomes the Kingdom of Christ")). The instability and tragic cycles of 1 Kings 15:28 thus serve as a dark, yet essential, backdrop against which the glorious, unshakable, and redemptive kingdom of Christ shines ever brighter, offering the only true hope for humanity.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Deuteronomy 32:35

To me [belongeth] vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in [due] time: for the day of their calamity [is] at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste.