TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 2:18–55.
The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:54 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 2:54 continues the meticulous genealogical record of the tribe of Judah, specifically detailing the descendants of Salma, a son of Caleb. Unlike earlier verses listing individuals, this verse enumerates various towns, clans, and communal entities—such as Bethlehem, the Netophathites, Ataroth, the house of Joab, half of the Manahethites, and the Zorites—as if they were Salma's "sons." This unique presentation highlights the Chronicler's interest not just in individual lineage but in the establishment and identity of the communities and geographical regions that comprised the tribal inheritance of Judah, laying the groundwork for the Davidic monarchy and the future of God's covenant people.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is deeply embedded within the extensive genealogies of Judah, which span from 1 Chronicles 2:3 through 1 Chronicles 4:23. The Chronicler's primary purpose in beginning the book with such detailed lists was to establish the identity, heritage, and legitimate claims of the post-exilic community returning to Judah. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 2:18 introduces Caleb, a prominent figure whose descendants are meticulously traced. Verse 54 continues this lineage through Salma, one of Caleb's sons, but significantly shifts from naming individuals to identifying communities and places. This transition underscores that the genealogies were not merely about personal ancestry but about the formation and structure of the tribal landscape, indicating settlement patterns and the establishment of key Judahite localities vital for the re-establishment of the nation.
Historical & Cultural Context
For the returning exiles in the post-Babylonian period, genealogies were far from dry lists; they were vital documents. They served as legal records, confirming land ownership, tribal affiliation, and the right to participate in the restored community and temple worship. The mention of towns like Bethlehem and groups like the Netophathites signifies the re-establishment of the Judahite presence in their ancestral lands after the devastation of the exile. The "house of Joab" refers to a powerful and influential family, likely descended from Joab, King David's formidable general, indicating their deep and ancient roots within this lineage and their continued prominence. The meticulous preservation of such records reflects a cultural emphasis on continuity, heritage, and the divine promises tied to the land and the people, essential for rebuilding national identity and order.
Key Themes
1 Chronicles 2:54 contributes to several overarching themes in Chronicles. First, it emphasizes the importance of lineage and identity, demonstrating how God preserved the tribal structures and familial ties through generations, even through periods of exile. The Chronicler meticulously traces the line of Judah because it is the royal tribe, destined to produce the Davidic dynasty. Second, the naming of specific towns and clans highlights geographical and communal connections, showing the tangible establishment of God's people within the promised land. The inclusion of Bethlehem is particularly significant, as it was the hometown of King David (1 Samuel 17:12) and, prophetically, the birthplace of the Messiah. This meticulous record also underscores God's faithfulness in preservation, illustrating His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of a perpetual dynasty through Judah, which would ultimately lead to the Messiah.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the roots meaning "house" and "bread," Bethlehem literally means "house of bread." In this verse, it is listed as a "son" of Salma, indicating that it was either founded by or heavily populated by Salma's descendants, effectively becoming a familial or clan entity. Its inclusion underscores its ancient and integral connection to the tribe of Judah, predating its fame as David's birthplace and its prophetic significance.
This term is a patronymic, referring to the inhabitants of Netophah, a town located near Bethlehem. The listing of "Netophathites" rather than an individual name signifies that the genealogy here is tracking established communities or clans that originated from Salma's lineage. This demonstrates the expansion and settlement of his descendants into distinct geographical and social units, highlighting the communal aspect of Israelite identity.
This collective noun, like Netophathites, refers to the people of Manaheth, indicating a community or clan. The phrase "half of the Manahethites" suggests a division or a shared lineage with another group, highlighting the complex interrelationships and subdivisions within the larger tribal structure of Judah. It implies a specific segment of this community traced its ancestry to Salma.
Verse Breakdown
"The sons of Salma; Bethlehem"
This phrase introduces the descendants of Salma, a son of Caleb. The immediate listing of "Bethlehem" as a "son" is a prime example of metonymy, where the name of a place stands for the people or clan associated with it. It indicates that Bethlehem was a significant settlement or clan group that traced its origins back to Salma, signifying its early establishment within the Judahite tribal framework.
"and the Netophathites"
This refers to the inhabitants of Netophah, a town situated near Bethlehem. The use of a collective noun ("the Netophathites") rather than an individual name further emphasizes that the genealogy is tracking established communities and their geographical affiliations, indicating the spread and settlement of Salma's lineage into distinct, recognized groups.
"Ataroth, the house of Joab"
"Ataroth" is likely a place or clan name, possibly referring to Ataroth-beth-Joab. "The house of Joab" signifies a powerful and prominent family or clan, likely descended from Joab, King David's renowned general. This inclusion highlights the deep roots of influential families within these ancient Judahite lineages, demonstrating their established presence and connection to the tribal structure.
"and half of the Manahethites"
This phrase refers to a portion of the inhabitants or clan of Manaheth. The specification of "half" suggests a division of territory, a shared ancestral claim, or a particular segment of the Manahethite population linked to Salma's line, illustrating the intricate details of tribal and clan organization and their specific affiliations.
"the Zorites"
This refers to the inhabitants of Zorah, another town in Judah. Like the Netophathites and Manahethites, the Zorites represent a community or clan that traced its heritage through Salma, further detailing the geographical dispersion and communal identity of his descendants and highlighting the comprehensive nature of the Chronicler's record.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:54 is Metonymy, where a place name (like Bethlehem) or a collective noun for inhabitants (like Netophathites) stands in for the people or clan associated with that location or group. This reflects the ancient practice of identifying individuals and families by their geographical origins or the communities they founded, emphasizing communal identity over individual names in this specific context. The entire chapter, including this verse, functions as a Genealogy, a literary form crucial for establishing lineage, tribal identity, land rights, and the historical continuity of God's covenant people. The meticulous nature of these lists, even when seemingly dry, underscores the Chronicler's theological purpose in demonstrating God's faithfulness in preserving the chosen line through which His promises would be fulfilled, particularly the Davidic dynasty.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 2:54, though a seemingly obscure genealogical entry, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous and sovereign care for His covenant people. It demonstrates that God's plan unfolds not just through prominent individuals but through the establishment and preservation of entire communities and geographical locations. The Chronicler's painstaking detail in recording these lineages and their associated settlements underscores the divine commitment to maintaining the identity and inheritance of Judah, the tribe from which the Davidic monarchy would arise. This seemingly dry list is, in fact, a testament to God's faithfulness in preparing the way for His redemptive purposes, ensuring the continuity of the chosen line and the places integral to His unfolding narrative, ultimately pointing towards the Messiah.
Reflection and Application
While a list of names and places might initially seem distant from modern experience, 1 Chronicles 2:54 offers profound insights into God's character and His engagement with human history. It reminds us that our identity is not merely individual but often deeply intertwined with our heritage—familial, cultural, and spiritual. God's meticulous attention to detail in preserving these ancient lineages reflects His sovereign care for every person and every community, demonstrating that even the seemingly mundane aspects of life are part of His grand, unfolding narrative. This verse encourages us to consider how our own roots and the places we inhabit contribute to our story and, more importantly, to God's larger story of redemption. It fosters an appreciation for the long arc of God's faithfulness, assuring us that His purposes will always be fulfilled, often through the most unexpected or overlooked channels, building a profound sense of security in His divine plan.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does the text list towns and groups as "sons" of Salma?
In ancient Hebrew genealogical practices, the term "sons of" (Hebrew: b'nei) was not exclusively limited to direct biological offspring. It could also refer to descendants, clans, inhabitants of a particular place, or even the founders of a community. So, when 1 Chronicles 2:54 lists "Bethlehem" or "the Netophathites" as "sons of Salma," it signifies that these towns or groups were either founded by Salma's descendants, or their primary inhabitants traced their lineage back to him. This method of recording genealogies served to establish communal identity, land rights, and the historical connections of various settlements within the broader tribal structure of Judah. It highlights a focus on the collective "house" or "family" as a foundational unit, encompassing both individuals and the communities they formed, demonstrating the intricate social and geographical organization of ancient Israel.
What is the significance of Bethlehem being mentioned here?
The inclusion of Bethlehem in this ancient genealogy is profoundly significant, establishing its deep roots within the tribe of Judah long before it gained prominence. Bethlehem was the hometown of King David (1 Samuel 17:12), and its mention here underscores its ancient connection to the lineage that would produce Israel's greatest king. More importantly, it foreshadows Bethlehem's pivotal role in God's redemptive plan as prophesied in Micah 5:2, where it is declared the birthplace of the Messiah. Its presence in this detailed tribal record confirms its status as a divinely chosen location, integral to the unfolding of God's promises and the eventual coming of the Christ, linking the mundane details of a genealogy to the grand narrative of salvation history.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The meticulous detail of 1 Chronicles 2:54, seemingly a dry list of names and places, finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person of Jesus of Nazareth. The Chronicler's painstaking preservation of the Judahite lineage, particularly through Salma's descendants and the inclusion of Bethlehem, serves as a vital thread in the tapestry of God's redemptive plan. These ancient records establish the historical and genealogical credentials of the Messiah. Jesus, as recorded in the genealogies of Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, is explicitly identified as a descendant of Judah and David. Furthermore, the prophecy of Micah 5:2 explicitly states that the Ruler of Israel would come from Bethlehem, the very town rooted in Salma's lineage here. Thus, 1 Chronicles 2:54 is not just about historical record-keeping; it is a profound testament to God's sovereign faithfulness in meticulously preparing the way, through specific people and places, for the arrival of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, who would be born in the "house of bread" (Luke 2:4-7) and fulfill all the promises made to Judah and David, establishing His eternal kingdom.