TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 2:18–55.
The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:22 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 2:22 is a concise yet historically significant genealogical entry, detailing the lineage of Jair, son of Segub, and his notable acquisition of twenty-three cities within the Transjordanian region of Gilead. Embedded within the extensive genealogies of Israel, this verse serves not merely as a record of descent but as a vital affirmation of ancient land claims, tribal identity, and the enduring legacy of key figures within the broader Israelite framework, particularly highlighting the intertwined heritage of Judah and Manasseh.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is meticulously placed within the comprehensive genealogies that initiate the book of 1 Chronicles, specifically within the detailed lineage of Judah in chapter 2. Following a broader enumeration of Israel's sons in 1 Chronicles 2:1, the Chronicler's focus narrows to the tribe of Judah, from which the promised Davidic monarchy would emerge. The preceding verse, 1 Chronicles 2:21, is crucial as it establishes Segub's birth to Hezron (of Judah) and the daughter of Machir (of Manasseh), thereby setting the stage for Jair's unique dual tribal connection. The Chronicler's emphasis on these detailed family records was paramount for the post-exilic community, serving to reaffirm national identity, validate ancestral land claims, and confirm the legitimacy of both priestly and royal lines after the profound disruption of the Babylonian captivity.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, genealogies transcended simple family trees; they functioned as indispensable legal and cultural documents. They were fundamental for establishing tribal identity, confirming rights to inherited land (a fulfillment of God's covenant promises, as seen in passages like Genesis 12:7), and maintaining the purity of lineage, particularly for those in the priesthood and kingship. The mention of "Gilead" situates Jair's acquisition in the Transjordan region, east of the Jordan River. This area was strategically vital and frequently contested, renowned for its fertile pasturelands. Jair's ability to possess "three and twenty cities" signifies a substantial act of conquest or settlement, reflecting tribal expansion and the consolidation of territory during the period of the Judges or early monarchy. This historical detail is corroborated in other biblical books, such as Numbers 32:41 and Deuteronomy 3:14.
Key Themes
This verse significantly contributes to several overarching themes pervasive in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it underscores Genealogical Precision and Divine Order, illustrating God's meticulous attention to detail in His overarching plan for His people, extending even to specific family lines and territorial possessions. Secondly, it highlights the profound theme of Inheritance and Possession of the Promised Land, showcasing the tangible fulfillment of God's covenant promises to Israel through the establishment of their tribes in divinely allotted territories. Jair's acquisition of cities in Gilead stands as a concrete example of this divine faithfulness. Thirdly, it touches upon Leadership and Legacy, presenting Jair as a figure of considerable influence and power whose actions left an indelible mark on the landscape and history of Israel, as evidenced by the naming of cities after him (Havoth-jair). This exemplifies the importance of individuals within God's grand narrative and their role in the unfolding of His redemptive purposes.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "aloft" or "exalted," Segub is presented here as the father of Jair. While the name's meaning isn't directly elaborated in the verse, it places Jair within a specific lineage that connects the tribes of Judah and Manasseh, highlighting the intertribal relationships and the complex tapestry of Israelite identity.
Derived from a root meaning "enlightener," Jair is the central figure of this verse. His name suggests one who brings light or prominence. In this context, Jair's actions in acquiring numerous cities certainly brought him prominence and established a lasting legacy, indicating a figure of significant influence and leadership in the early history of Israel's territorial settlement.
This term refers to a city, a place guarded by watching or a watch, in its widest sense, encompassing even encampments or fortified posts. The mention of "cities" signifies established settlements or strategic locations, underscoring the substantial nature of Jair's territorial control and the administrative significance of his acquisitions within the land of Gilead.
Verse Breakdown
"And Segub begat Jair"
This initial clause establishes the direct paternal lineage, explicitly connecting Jair to Segub. As detailed in 1 Chronicles 2:21, Segub was the son of Hezron (from the tribe of Judah) and the daughter of Machir (from the tribe of Manasseh). This dual tribal heritage is pivotal for understanding Jair's unique position within both the Judahite and Manassehite genealogies, illustrating the complex intermarriage and relationships that wove together the larger Israelite family.
"who had three and twenty cities"
This phrase quantifies Jair's significant territorial acquisition. The precise number "twenty-three" is a hallmark of meticulous record-keeping in biblical genealogies and historical accounts. It underscores the extensive nature of his influence and the tangible reality of his inheritance, implying a substantial domain. This detail suggests Jair was a figure of considerable power, leadership, or military prowess, capable of establishing control over such a large number of settlements.
"in the land of Gilead"
This concluding clause specifies the geographical location of these cities. By situating them in Gilead, the verse firmly connects Jair's achievements to the eastern territories of Israel, which were settled by the Transjordanian tribes. This detail reinforces the fulfillment of God's promise of land to His people, demonstrating how specific individuals contributed to the tribal establishment and expansion within the divinely allotted territories.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:22, and indeed throughout the opening chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This systematic listing of ancestors and descendants serves multiple critical purposes: it establishes national identity, validates land claims, and reinforces the historical continuity of God's covenant people. The inclusion of specific details like the precise number of cities and their geographical location in Gilead demonstrates Numerical Precision and Geographical Specificity, which lend historical verisimilitude and administrative credibility to the ancient record. While remarkably concise, the verse also employs Conciseness to convey significant historical and genealogical information efficiently, a characteristic feature of ancient Near Eastern record-keeping. The mention of Jair's possession of cities further highlights the theme of Legacy, as his actions and influence are permanently etched into the historical and geographical record of Israel.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 2:22, though a brief genealogical note, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous faithfulness to His covenant promises. The precise recording of Jair's lineage and his acquisition of cities in Gilead is not merely a historical detail but a powerful testament to God's unwavering commitment to establish His people securely in the land He promised them. It reveals that even in the seemingly mundane details of tribal expansion and settlement, the divine hand is actively at work, orchestrating the fulfillment of His word. This verse reminds us that God cares deeply about the individual lives and contributions of His people, weaving their unique stories into the grander tapestry of His redemptive plan. It underscores the tangible blessings that accompany obedience and the undeniable reality of God's provision for His chosen nation, demonstrating His faithfulness across generations.
Reflection and Application
While a simple genealogical entry, 1 Chronicles 2:22 offers profound insights for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of intricate order and meticulous detail, who carefully records and remembers every individual and their unique place in His grand narrative. Just as Jair had a specific inheritance and sphere of influence, so too do we, as spiritual heirs in Christ, receive a spiritual inheritance and are called to steward areas of influence for God's kingdom. This verse encourages us to deeply value our spiritual heritage, understanding that we are part of a continuous, unfolding story of God's faithfulness across generations. It challenges us to prayerfully consider what "cities" – what areas of responsibility, spiritual gifts, relationships, or ministry – God has entrusted to us, and how we are actively building a lasting legacy that honors Him, not for personal renown, but for the advancement of His divine purposes and the flourishing of His people. Our lives, no matter how seemingly small or insignificant in the grand scheme, are intricately woven into God's magnificent design, and He remembers every act of faithfulness.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Who was Jair, and why is he mentioned here with such specific detail?
Jair was a significant figure in early Israelite history, renowned for his territorial conquests and settlement in the Transjordan region of Gilead. He is specifically mentioned here in 1 Chronicles 2:22 because he represents a unique genealogical link between the tribe of Judah (through his grandfather Hezron) and the tribe of Manasseh (through his grandmother, Machir's daughter, as seen in 1 Chronicles 2:21). The specific detail about his "three and twenty cities" is crucial for several reasons: it served to validate tribal land claims in the post-exilic period when 1 Chronicles was written, it highlights his historical importance as a leader or conqueror, and it provides a tangible example of God's faithfulness in granting the promised land to His people. His exploits are also recorded in Numbers 32:41 and Deuteronomy 3:14, where the cities are even named "Havoth-jair" (the towns of Jair), underscoring his lasting legacy.
Why are genealogies so important in 1 Chronicles, especially a verse like this?
The genealogies in 1 Chronicles, including 1 Chronicles 2:22, served a critical purpose for the Jewish community returning from Babylonian exile. They were not merely historical records but foundational documents for re-establishing national identity and continuity. Genealogies confirmed tribal affiliations, which were essential for legitimate land claims (as seen with Jair's cities in Gilead), for determining who could serve in the priesthood (only descendants of Aaron), and for tracing the lineage of the Davidic kings, upon whom the hope of a restored monarchy rested. This meticulous record-keeping underscored God's faithfulness to His covenants, demonstrating that despite exile and displacement, His promises regarding land, lineage, and leadership remained intact and were being fulfilled through specific individuals and families throughout Israel's history.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Chronicles 2:22 meticulously details an earthly lineage and a tangible inheritance of cities in Gilead, it subtly points towards the infinitely greater spiritual lineage and inheritance found exclusively in Christ. Jair's acquisition of "three and twenty cities" represents a temporal, physical possession within the promised land, serving as a type or foreshadowing of God's faithfulness to His people. However, in Christ, believers are divinely grafted into a spiritual lineage, becoming true spiritual descendants of Abraham by faith, inheriting not just a piece of land but the boundless fullness of God's spiritual blessings and promises (as powerfully articulated in Galatians 3:29). Our true "cities" are not earthly territories but the eternal spiritual kingdom of God and the glorious promise of the New Jerusalem, a city with unshakable foundations whose architect and builder is God Himself (Hebrews 11:10). Christ Himself is the ultimate fulfillment of all promises of land, rest, and inheritance, offering His followers an eternal dwelling place and a spiritual dominion that transcends any earthly possession (Ephesians 1:11). Through Him, we are not merely recorded in human genealogies but are eternally written in the Lamb's Book of Life (Revelation 21:27), receiving an imperishable inheritance that never fades away, kept in heaven for us (1 Peter 1:4).