Genesis 42:37

KJV

And Reuben spake unto his father, saying, Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee: deliver him into my hand, and I will bring him to thee again.

KJV (with Strong's)

And Reuben {H7205} spake {H559} unto his father {H1}, saying {H559}, Slay {H4191} my two {H8147} sons {H1121}, if I bring {H935} him not to thee: deliver {H5414} him into my hand {H3027}, and I will bring him to thee again {H7725}.

Complete Jewish Bible

Re'uven said to his father, "If I don't bring him back to you, you can kill my own two sons! Put him in my care; I will return him to you."

Berean Standard Bible

Then Reuben said to his father, “You may kill my two sons if I fail to bring him back to you. Put him in my care, and I will return him.”

American Standard Version

And Reuben spake unto his father, saying, Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee: deliver him into my hand, and I will bring him to thee again.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Genesis 42:37 records Reuben's desperate and extreme pledge to his father Jacob, offering the lives of his own two sons as surety for the safe return of Benjamin from Egypt. This dramatic vow underscores the family's dire situation due to the severe famine and their urgent need to comply with the Egyptian governor's demand to bring Benjamin, the youngest brother, to secure more food and Simeon's release. Reuben's offer highlights the immense pressure and the lengths to which the brothers felt compelled to go to ensure their survival and maintain familial unity.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse is situated at a critical juncture in the Joseph narrative, immediately following Jacob's profound distress and refusal to send Benjamin to Egypt, fearing that "mischief" would befall him, especially after the presumed loss of Joseph ([Genesis 42:36](/genesis/42-36 "Jacob's lament over Joseph and Benjamin")). The brothers have returned from Egypt with a limited supply of grain and Simeon held captive, facing a renewed demand from the Egyptian governor (Joseph, whom they do not recognize) to bring Benjamin as proof of their honesty. Jacob's deep-seated grief and protective instincts create an impasse, as he clings tightly to Benjamin, the only remaining child of his beloved Rachel. In this moment of familial deadlock and escalating crisis, Reuben, as the eldest, steps forward with an extraordinary and shocking proposition, attempting to assert leadership and responsibility by offering a desperate guarantee to persuade his hesitant father. This scene sets the stage for the eventual journey to Egypt with Benjamin, a pivotal moment in the unfolding narrative of Joseph and his brothers.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** The ancient Near East frequently experienced devastating famines, making the securing of food a matter of life and death, often necessitating migration or desperate measures. Egypt, with its reliance on the Nile, was often a granary for the region, as depicted in this narrative. Within this cultural backdrop, oaths and vows were deeply significant and legally binding commitments. Extreme pledges, such as offering the lives of one's children, while shocking to modern sensibilities, were employed to convey absolute sincerity and an unbreakable commitment, underscoring the gravity of the situation and the speaker's resolve. While not necessarily implying literal execution, the severity of the oath was understood. The cultural emphasis on family lineage, the preservation of sons, and the importance of a patriarch's decision further magnify the weight of Reuben's offer and Jacob's dilemma.
* **Key Themes:** Genesis 42:37 contributes to several overarching themes within the broader Jacob narrative and the book of Genesis. It powerfully illustrates the theme of **divine providence** operating even amidst human desperation, flawed decisions, and seemingly insurmountable obstacles, as God's plan for Jacob's family continues to unfold despite their trials. The verse also highlights the complex dynamics of **familial relationships**, particularly the evolving leadership roles and responsibilities among Jacob's sons, and their ongoing struggle with guilt and the consequences of their past actions towards Joseph ([Genesis 37:18-28](/genesis/37-18-28 "The brothers' plot against Joseph")). Furthermore, it emphasizes the theme of **testing and transformation**, as Joseph's actions in Egypt serve to test his brothers' character, fostering repentance and preparing them for reconciliation, a process ultimately designed to preserve the nascent nation of Israel.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Reuben's plea in Genesis 42:37 is a moment of profound desperation, revealing the immense pressure on Jacob's family. The KJV text states, "And Reuben spake unto his father, saying, Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee: deliver him into my hand, and I will bring him to thee again." This is not merely a promise but an oath of the highest, most shocking magnitude, designed to break through Jacob's resistance.

#### Key Word Analysis
* **father (Hebrew, _ʼâb'_):** H1, referring to Jacob, the patriarch, this term emphasizes the familial hierarchy and the ultimate authority Reuben is attempting to sway. The word signifies not just a biological parent but also a figure of authority, a chief, and the foundational head of the family, whose decision is paramount for the family's survival. Reuben's plea is directed at this revered figure, highlighting the deep respect and desperate need for his consent.
* **sons (Hebrew, _bên'_):** H1121, "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense." Reuben's offer to "Slay my two sons" (literally "my two builders of the family name") underscores the extreme nature of his vow. Sons were critical for perpetuating the family line, inheritance, and identity in ancient Israelite culture. To offer them as collateral demonstrates the ultimate commitment and the profound crisis facing the family, where even the continuation of their lineage seems secondary to immediate survival.
* **hand (Hebrew, _yâd'_):** H3027, referring to "the open one (indicating power, means, direction, etc.)." When Reuben says "deliver him into my hand," he is requesting full responsibility and control over Benjamin's safety. The "hand" here symbolizes his power, ability, and personal guarantee to protect Benjamin and bring him back. It's an assertion of his capability and commitment, appealing to Jacob to trust his capacity to fulfill his promise.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"And Reuben spake unto his father, saying,"**: This opening clause sets the scene for Reuben's dramatic intervention. As the eldest son, Reuben is expected to take initiative and responsibility, particularly in a crisis that threatens the entire family. His direct address to "his father" underscores the patriarchal authority Jacob holds and the gravity of the conversation, indicating a plea of utmost seriousness.
* **"Slay my two sons, if I bring him not to thee:"**: This is the core of Reuben's shocking, conditional oath. He offers the lives of his own children as a guarantee for Benjamin's safe return. While likely hyperbolic and not intended for literal execution, this extreme vow was a culturally understood way to convey absolute sincerity and an unbreakable commitment, designed to overcome Jacob's profound reluctance and fear. It highlights the desperate measures the family felt compelled to consider.
* **"deliver him into my hand, and I will bring him to thee again."**: This final clause articulates Reuben's request and his promise. He asks Jacob to entrust Benjamin into his personal care and responsibility ("into my hand"), signifying his willingness to take full accountability. The accompanying promise, "and I will bring him to thee again," is the desired outcome, emphasizing his unwavering commitment to Benjamin's safe return and the family's survival, which hinges on this perilous journey to Egypt.

#### Literary Devices
The passage employs several significant literary devices to convey the intensity of the moment. **Hyperbole** is central to Reuben's vow, "Slay my two sons," an extreme and shocking declaration not meant to be taken literally but to convey the utmost sincerity and desperation. This exaggeration highlights the severity of the famine and the family's plight. **Foreshadowing** is also present, as Reuben's ultimately ineffective pledge subtly anticipates Judah's later, more compelling and self-sacrificial guarantee for Benjamin ([Genesis 43:8-9](/genesis/43-8-9 "Judah's pledge for Benjamin")). This contrast sets up the evolving leadership dynamics among Jacob's sons, hinting at Judah's eventual prominence. Furthermore, the narrative uses **pathos** to evoke sympathy for Jacob's distress and the brothers' desperation, drawing the reader into the emotional intensity of the family's crisis.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Reuben's desperate vow, while extreme, is a poignant illustration of human attempts to control circumstances and secure outcomes in the face of overwhelming adversity. It highlights the limitations of human pledges, especially when contrasted with God's perfect and unfailing covenant promises. Even in this moment of profound familial crisis and flawed human proposals, God's sovereign hand is at work, orchestrating events for the preservation of Jacob's family and the eventual formation of the nation of Israel. The narrative subtly reveals that true security and deliverance do not ultimately rest on human guarantees, however extreme, but on divine providence, which guides and sustains His people.

* [Genesis 22:1-14](/genesis/22-1-14 "Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac and God's provision")
* [Psalm 46:1](/psalm/46-1 "God as our refuge and strength")
* [Proverbs 3:5-6](/proverbs/3-5-6 "Trust in the Lord with all your heart")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Reuben's desperate offer to sacrifice his sons serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which individuals may go when faced with overwhelming fear, grief, or perceived necessity. It challenges us to consider our own responses in moments of crisis: Do we resort to extreme, self-devised solutions, or do we seek God's wisdom and trust in His provision? While Reuben's intentions were likely noble—to save his family from starvation and secure Simeon's release—his method was both shocking and ultimately ineffective in swaying Jacob. This narrative encourages us to reflect on the nature of our commitments and the source of our security. Instead of relying on human guarantees or desperate measures, we are called to place our trust in God's faithfulness, knowing that His plans for our good are far superior to our own flawed attempts to control outcomes. The larger story of Joseph and his brothers, culminating in reconciliation and preservation, beautifully illustrates that God can work through complex and challenging circumstances, transforming what was meant for evil into good ([Genesis 50:20](/genesis/50-20 "God's redemptive purpose in Joseph's life")). This invites us to cultivate a deeper reliance on divine providence, even when circumstances seem most dire, finding peace in His perfect timing and unfailing care.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **In what ways do I, like Reuben, sometimes resort to extreme or self-devised solutions when faced with difficult circumstances, rather than trusting God fully?**
* **How does this story challenge my understanding of responsibility and leadership within my own family or community, particularly when facing difficult decisions?**
* **What does Reuben's failed pledge teach me about the limitations of human promises and the ultimate reliability of God's unfailing covenants?**

### FAQ
**Why did Reuben make such an extreme vow, offering his own sons?**

Answer: Reuben's vow to sacrifice his two sons was an oath of the highest possible magnitude in ancient Near Eastern culture, designed to convey absolute sincerity and an unbreakable commitment. He was desperate to convince his father, Jacob, of the dire necessity of sending Benjamin to Egypt to secure food for the starving family and Simeon's release. Reuben hoped such a severe pledge would overcome Jacob's profound reluctance and deep-seated fear for his youngest son, given the previous presumed loss of Joseph.

**Was Jacob expected to literally kill Reuben's sons if Benjamin wasn't returned?**

Answer: No, it was not necessarily expected that Jacob would literally execute his grandsons. The severity of the oath was primarily rhetorical and hyperbolic, intended to impress upon Jacob the gravity of the situation and Reuben's unwavering resolve. It was a cultural idiom used to emphasize the absolute certainty of his commitment and the dire consequences he was willing to face, rather than a literal demand for infanticide.

**Did Jacob accept Reuben's offer and send Benjamin with him?**

Answer: No, Jacob initially refused Reuben's offer, as shown in the very next verse ([Genesis 42:38](/genesis/42-38 "Jacob's initial refusal to send Benjamin")). His grief and fear for Benjamin's safety outweighed Reuben's dramatic pledge. It was later that Judah, a younger brother, provided a more persuasive and effective pledge, offering himself as surety for Benjamin, which ultimately convinced Jacob to let Benjamin go ([Genesis 43:8-9](/genesis/43-8-9 "Judah's compelling pledge for Benjamin")).

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Reuben's desperate, yet ultimately ineffective, pledge to sacrifice his sons highlights the profound limitations of human guarantees and the inherent need for a perfect surety. While Reuben offered the lives of his descendants—a promise Jacob did not accept—Jesus Christ, the true and eternal [firstborn over all creation](/colossians/1-15 "Colossians 1:15 - Christ, the firstborn over all creation"), willingly offered His own life as the ultimate and perfect guarantee for humanity. Unlike Reuben's flawed attempt to secure a temporary salvation from famine, Jesus, the [Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world](/john/1-29 "John 1:29 - Jesus, the Lamb of God"), literally gave His life as a perfect sacrifice, not for the return of a brother, but for the eternal redemption and reconciliation of all who believe. His pledge was not a hyperbolic oath but a literal, self-sacrificial act that fully satisfied divine justice ([Romans 3:25-26](/romans/3-25-26 "Romans 3:25-26 - God's righteousness through Christ's sacrifice")) and secured true, lasting life for His people, fulfilling God's covenant promises with absolute certainty ([2_corinthians/1-20](/2_corinthians/1-20 "2 Corinthians 1:20 - God's promises are 'Yes' in Christ")). He is the faithful and true witness ([Revelation 3:14](/revelation/3-14 "Revelation 3:14 - Christ, the faithful and true witness")) whose sacrifice is eternally sufficient, a perfect and complete fulfillment of all that human vows could only imperfectly grasp.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Micah 6:7

Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, [or] with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn [for] my transgression, the fruit of my body [for] the sin of my soul?

Genesis 46:9

And the sons of Reuben; Hanoch, and Phallu, and Hezron, and Carmi.

Genesis 43:9

I will be surety for him; of my hand shalt thou require him: if I bring him not unto thee, and set him before thee, then let me bear the blame for ever:

Genesis 44:32

For thy servant became surety for the lad unto my father, saying, If I bring him not unto thee, then I shall bear the blame to my father for ever.

Genesis 44:34

For how shall I go up to my father, and the lad [be] not with me? lest peradventure I see the evil that shall come on my father.