TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 22:1–6.
Here are the laws,
I.Concerning theft, which are these:
- 1. If a man steal any cattle (in which the wealth of those times chiefly consisted), and they be found in his custody, he must restore double, Exo 22:4. Thus he must both satisfy for the wrong and suffer for the crime. But it was afterwards provided that if the thief were touched in conscience, and voluntarily confessed it, before it was discovered or enquired into by any other, then he should only make restitution of what he had stolen, and add to it a fifth part, Lev 6:4, Lev 6:5. 2. If he had killed or sold the sheep or ox he had stolen, and thereby persisted in his crime, he must restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep (Exo 22:1), more for an ox than for a sheep because the owner, besides all the other profit, lost the daily labour of his ox. This law teaches us that fraud and injustice, so far from enriching men, will impoverish them: if we unjustly get and keep that which is another's, it will not only waste itself, but it will consume that which is our own. 3. If he was not able to make restitution, he must be sold for a slave, Exo 22:3. The court of judgment was to do it, and it is probable that the person robbed had the money. Thus with us, in some cases, felons are transported into plantations where alone Englishmen know what slavery is. 4. If a thief broke a house in the night, and was killed in the doing of it, his blood was upon his own head, and should not be required at the hand of him that shed it, Exo 22:2. As he that does an unlawful act bears the blame of the mischief that follows to others, so likewise of that which follows to himself. A man's house is his castle, and God's law, as well as man's, sets a guard upon it; he that assaults it does so at his peril. Yet, if it was in the day-time that the thief was killed, he that killed him must be accountable for it (Exo 22:3), unless it was in the necessary defence of his own life. Note, We ought to be tender of the lives even of bad men; the magistrate must afford us redress, and we must not avenge ourselves.
II.Concerning trespass, Exo 22:5.
He that wilfully put his cattle into his neighbour's field must make restitution of the best of his own. Our law makes a much greater difference between this and other thefts than the law of Moses did. The Jews hence observed it as a general rule that restitution must always be made of the best, and that no man should keep any cattle that were likely to trespass upon his neighbours or do them any damage. We should be more careful not to do wrong than not to suffer wrong, because to suffer wrong is only an affliction, but to do wrong is a sin, and sin is always worse than affliction.
III.Concerning damage done by fire, Exo 22:6.
He that designed only the burning of thorns might become accessory to the burning of corn, and should not be held guiltless. Men of hot and eager spirits should take heed, lest, while they pretend only to pluck up the tares, they root out the wheat also. If the fire did mischief, he that kindled it must answer for it, though it could not be proved that he designed the mischief. Men must suffer for their carelessness, as well as for their malice. We must take heed of beginning strife; for, though it seem but little, we know not how great a matter it may kindle, the blame of which we must bear, if, with the madman, we cast fire-brands, arrows, and death, and pretend we mean no harm. It will make us very careful of ourselves, if we consider that we are accountable, not only for the hurt we do, but for the hurt we occasion through inadvertency.
Continue studying Exodus 22:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 22:5 establishes a pivotal civil law within the Mosaic covenant, meticulously detailing the liability of an individual whose livestock damages another's agricultural property. This statute profoundly underscores the principles of personal accountability, the sanctity of private property and livelihood, and the imperative of generous restitution within ancient Israelite society, ensuring that the wronged party is not merely compensated but made truly whole, even to the point of receiving "the best" as both a deterrent against negligence and a measure of restorative justice.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 22:5 is intricately woven into the fabric of the "Book of the Covenant" (Exodus 20:22-23:33), a comprehensive collection of civil, social, and ceremonial laws divinely imparted to Moses immediately following the foundational Ten Commandments. This section of Exodus marks a crucial transition from broad moral imperatives to specific, practical legal applications, meticulously outlining the societal framework for the nascent nation of Israel. The laws within this book span a wide spectrum of issues, encompassing statutes on slavery, personal injury, property rights, social justice, and religious observance. Specifically, Exodus 21 and 22 delve extensively into regulations concerning property damage and personal injury, vividly demonstrating God's meticulous concern for justice, order, and the well-being of His people in their daily interactions. This particular verse follows laws addressing various forms of theft and precedes regulations concerning other forms of negligence and financial responsibility, thereby reinforcing a consistent overarching theme of accountability for one's actions and the proper stewardship of one's possessions.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was fundamentally an agrarian society, where fields, vineyards, and livestock represented the bedrock of wealth, sustenance, and family livelihood. The destruction of crops, whether through human negligence or animal trespass, could precipitate devastating economic hardship for a family or even an entire community, potentially leading to famine or destitution. While fences and enclosures were common, they were not always impenetrable, and animals, particularly cattle and sheep, were frequently grazed in communal or open pasturage, rendering accidental trespass a significant and recurring concern. Laws such as Exodus 22:5 were therefore indispensable for maintaining social order, mitigating potential feuds, and ensuring the economic stability of the Israelite populace. The explicit emphasis on providing restitution "of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard" powerfully highlights the immense value placed on agricultural output and the severe impact of its destruction. This stipulation served not only as a potent deterrent against carelessness but also as a robust mechanism to restore the victim beyond mere equivalence, reflecting a society where communal welfare and individual responsibility were deeply intertwined, all undergirded by divine mandate, as evidenced by other laws concerning property and liability found throughout the Mosaic Law.
Key Themes
Exodus 22:5 contributes significantly to several key theological and narrative themes prevalent in the Book of Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost among these is the theme of Divine Justice and Righteousness, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for equitable dealings among His people and His desire for a society governed by fairness. It also underscores the theme of Personal Accountability, emphasizing that individuals are responsible not only for their direct actions but also for the consequences of their negligence and the proper management of their property. The law highlights the Sanctity of Property and Livelihood, recognizing that a person's ability to sustain themselves and their family is a fundamental right and a blessing from God, thus requiring robust protection. Furthermore, the explicit demand for "the best" in restitution introduces the theme of Restorative Justice and Wholeness (Shalom), aiming not merely to repay a debt but to fully restore the wronged party, fostering peace and preventing lingering resentment. This principle of generous restitution is a recurring motif in Old Testament law, aiming to establish a just and harmonious community under God's covenant, reflecting the divine character of a God who desires wholeness for His people, as seen in other legal provisions like those in Deuteronomy 22.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root signifies "to consume," often specifically "by eating." In the context of Exodus 22:5, it denotes the destructive grazing or devouring of crops by animals, implying a thorough and damaging consumption that results in significant loss for the field or vineyard owner. It conveys the complete destruction of agricultural produce.
Derived from the root meaning "to eat," this noun specifically refers to domestic animals, particularly cattle or livestock, which are typically used for grazing. Its use here precisely identifies the instrument of the damage and, by extension, highlights the owner's responsibility for controlling these valuable yet potentially destructive assets.
This primitive root carries the fundamental meaning "to be complete," "to be sound," or "to be whole." In legal contexts, it denotes making full payment or compensation, restoring what was lost, and bringing about a state of wholeness or peace (shalom). The addition of "of the best" in this verse elevates the meaning beyond simple equivalence, implying a generous and complete restoration that may include a punitive element or compensation for indirect losses, thereby making the injured party more than whole.
Verse Breakdown
"If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten"
This initial clause establishes the conditional premise of the offense, setting the stage for the legal consequence. The phrase "cause... to be eaten" implies a degree of culpability, whether through direct negligence (e.g., failing to secure a gate) or perhaps even intentional action (e.g., deliberately pasturing animals in another's field). The focus is squarely on the result of the action—the destruction of valuable crops in a field or vineyard, which were absolutely vital for sustenance and economic well-being in ancient Israel.
"and shall put in his beast, and shall feed in another man's field"
This segment clarifies the precise mechanism of the damage. The "beast" (livestock) is identified as the direct instrument of destruction, and the act of "feeding" in "another man's field" is the immediate cause of the crops being "eaten." This phrasing unequivocally emphasizes the owner's responsibility for controlling their animals and respecting established property boundaries. It draws a clear causal link between the owner's action (or culpable inaction) and the animal's destructive behavior.
"of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard, shall he make restitution"
This concluding clause prescribes the nature and extent of the compensation required. The offender is commanded not merely to repay the exact monetary or agricultural value of the damaged crops but to give from "the best" of his own produce. This stipulation transcends simple equivalence, serving as a significant deterrent against future negligence and ensuring that the wronged party receives not just compensation, but a premium that acknowledges the severity of the loss, the disruption it caused, and perhaps even the emotional distress. It powerfully underscores a principle of generous justice, aiming to fully restore the victim and impress upon the offender the gravity of their negligence and the high value placed on a neighbor's livelihood.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Exodus 22:5 is Casuistic Law. This is a pervasive legal formulation in the ancient Near East and a hallmark of the Book of the Covenant, characterized by its distinctive "if... then..." structure. It presents a specific case or scenario ("If a man shall cause a field or vineyard to be eaten...") and then precisely prescribes the legal consequence or judgment ("...of the best of his own field... shall he make restitution"). This device renders the law highly practical, directly applicable to real-life situations, and easily comprehensible for the community. The specific detail regarding "the best" also employs a form of Legal Precision and perhaps a mild Hyperbole or Emphasis to underscore the severity of the penalty and the immense value placed on agricultural property. This ensures that the restitution is not merely adequate but overwhelmingly restorative, serving both compensatory and punitive functions, thereby reinforcing the gravity of the offense and the importance of personal responsibility.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 22:5 profoundly articulates God's unwavering concern for justice, personal responsibility, and the holistic well-being of the community. It reflects a divine mandate for individuals to be held accountable for their actions and the consequences stemming from their property, underscoring that carelessness or negligence leading to harm must be met with significant, and even generous, restitution. This law highlights the inherent sanctity of private property and the means of livelihood, recognizing that an individual's ability to provide for themselves and their family is a fundamental aspect of human dignity and societal stability. The explicit requirement for "the best" of restitution reveals God's desire for a justice that not only restores what was lost but also actively deters future wrongdoing and fosters a community where individuals are truly made whole. This principle extends far beyond mere agricultural damage, embodying a broader ethic of making comprehensive amends and profoundly valuing one's neighbor.
Reflection and Application
While specifically tailored to an ancient agrarian context, the timeless principles embedded within Exodus 22:5 retain profound relevance for contemporary life. This passage issues a compelling call to a high standard of personal responsibility, urging us to be acutely mindful of how our actions, our possessions, and even our inadvertent negligence can significantly impact others. It challenges us to deeply consider the potential ripple effects of our carelessness, whether it pertains to our physical property (such as pets, vehicles, or homes), our digital footprint and online interactions, or even the thoughtless words we speak. When harm is caused, whether intentionally or inadvertently, this divine law compels us not merely to offer a superficial apology but to actively and diligently seek to make comprehensive amends, and to do so with a spirit of generosity. This means going beyond the bare minimum of compensation to truly restore the wronged party, reflecting a commitment to justice that unequivocally prioritizes the well-being and wholeness of the victim. Ultimately, it serves as a powerful reminder that valuing our neighbor's livelihood, peace, and security is a tangible, practical expression of love and an indispensable cornerstone of a healthy, God-honoring community.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does the law require "of the best" for restitution, rather than just an equal amount?
The requirement for restitution "of the best of his own field, and of the best of his own vineyard" goes beyond simple equivalence for several profound theological and practical reasons. Theologically, it reflects God's standard of generous justice, aiming not just to compensate for a quantifiable loss but to truly make the wronged party whole, perhaps even better off than before the damage occurred. This premium serves as a significant deterrent against future negligence or intentional harm, impressing upon the offender the severe consequences of their actions and fostering a greater sense of responsibility. Practically, it might also account for indirect losses (e.g., lost labor, emotional distress, or the time and effort required to re-establish the field or vineyard) that are difficult to quantify precisely. By demanding "the best," the law ensures that the victim is fully restored, that justice is manifestly served, and that the community understands the high value placed on agricultural livelihood and the sanctity of property rights, as seen in other comprehensive laws concerning restitution, such as those found in Leviticus 6.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 22:5, with its profound emphasis on personal responsibility, comprehensive restitution, and generous justice, finds its ultimate fulfillment and deepest meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the Mosaic Law meticulously demands restitution for damage caused by human negligence, Christ offers the ultimate and perfect restitution for the damage caused by sin—a damage infinitely more profound than any physical or economic loss. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, providing a perfect, complete, and superabundant atonement that makes us whole, not just "of the best" but with the very best of God's own being—His Son. Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is the supreme act of "making restitution," fully restoring humanity's broken relationship with God and profoundly reconciling us to the Father (2 Corinthians 5:18-19). Furthermore, Jesus' teachings elevate the spirit of this ancient law, moving beyond mere legal compliance to a heart of radical generosity, reconciliation, and proactive love. He teaches us to "go the extra mile" (Matthew 5:41), to earnestly seek reconciliation with our brother before offering our gifts to God (Matthew 5:23-24), and to love our neighbor as ourselves, embodying the very essence of the law and the prophets (Mark 12:31). Thus, the principle of generous restitution in Exodus 22:5 powerfully foreshadows the abundant grace and transformative, restorative work of Christ, who not only pays our immense debt but also empowers us, through His Spirit, to live lives of profound accountability, divine justice, and sacrificial love towards others, thereby reflecting the very character of God's kingdom.