Exodus 22:12

KJV

And if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.

KJV (with Strong's)

And if it be stolen {H1589}{H1589} from him, he shall make restitution {H7999} unto the owner {H1167} thereof.

Complete Jewish Bible

But if it was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner.

Berean Standard Bible

But if the animal was actually stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner.

American Standard Version

But if it be stolen from him, he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Exodus 22:12, a foundational statute within the "Book of the Covenant," addresses the specific legal obligation of an individual entrusted with another's animal if that animal is subsequently stolen while under their care. This law mandates that the keeper, despite the theft being an external act, must make full restitution to the original owner, thereby underscoring a profound principle of diligent stewardship, unwavering accountability, and the vital importance of restoring justice and wholeness within ancient Israelite society.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Exodus 22:12 is embedded within a comprehensive collection of civil laws (Exodus 21:1-23:19) known as the "Book of the Covenant," which immediately follows the Decalogue given at Mount Sinai. This section meticulously elaborates on the practical implications of God's covenant with Israel, providing detailed statutes concerning property rights, social justice, and personal injury. Specifically, this verse follows closely after laws concerning entrusted animals where the loss is due to natural causes or accident (e.g., [Exodus 22:10-11](/exodus/22-10 "Exodus 22:10-11 - Laws Concerning Entrusted Animals")), which permit the keeper to be absolved by an oath before the Lord. By contrast, verse 12 introduces a critical distinction: if the loss is due to theft, the keeper's liability shifts, demanding full restitution. This progression highlights a nuanced legal framework that differentiates between various forms of loss, placing a higher degree of responsibility on the keeper for preventing theft, thus ensuring the protection of property and the maintenance of trust within the community.
* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In ancient Israel, an agrarian society, livestock such as cattle, sheep, and donkeys represented significant wealth, economic capital, and a primary source of sustenance. The practice of entrusting animals to another for pasturing, breeding, or temporary safekeeping was common, reflecting the interdependent and communal nature of their economy. Consequently, laws governing such arrangements were crucial for maintaining social order, protecting individual assets, and fostering trust. The strict stipulation in [Exodus 22:12](/exodus/22-12 "Exodus 22:12 - Law on Stolen Entrusted Animals") reflects a legal system that placed a substantial burden of proof and responsibility on the one who accepted entrusted property. Unlike scenarios of natural death or accident where an oath might suffice to clear the keeper, theft implied a failure in diligent oversight or protection, thereby necessitating full compensation. This rigorous approach ensured that property rights were upheld and that those who assumed responsibility for others' goods did so with the utmost seriousness, reinforcing accountability and stability within the Israelite community.
* **Key Themes:** Exodus 22:12 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the "Book of the Covenant" and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost among these is **Justice** (מִשְׁפָּט, _mishpat_), as the law aims to ensure equitable outcomes and protect the vulnerable, particularly property owners. It underscores the divine expectation for fair dealings and the restoration of what is lost, aligning with God's own righteous character. Another prominent theme is **Stewardship and Accountability**. The law holds the keeper accountable for the entrusted animal, even in the event of theft, emphasizing the moral and legal obligation to diligently care for another's possessions. This principle extends beyond material goods to encompass all forms of responsibility, reflecting the idea that all we possess ultimately belongs to God (cf. [Psalm 24:1](/psalm/24-1 "Psalm 24:1 - The Earth is the Lord's")). Furthermore, the concept of **Restitution** (from _shâlam_) is central, highlighting that true justice involves making the injured party whole again, restoring balance and peace (_shalom_) to the community, rather than merely punishing the wrongdoer. This emphasis on restoration is a hallmark of biblical law, distinguishing it from other ancient legal codes.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
#### Key Word Analysis
* **stolen (Hebrew, _gânab'_):** From the root H1589, this verb means "to thieve (literally or figuratively); by implication, to deceive; carry away, secretly bring, steal (away), get by stealth." Its use here specifically denotes an act of illicit appropriation by a third party, emphasizing that the loss was due to a criminal act, not negligence or natural disaster. Despite the external nature of the crime, the law still assigns responsibility to the keeper, implying a duty to actively guard against such occurrences.
* **restitution (Hebrew, _shâlam'_):** Derived from H7999, this primitive root means "to be safe (in mind, body or estate); figuratively, to be (causatively, make) completed; by implication, to be friendly; by extension, to reciprocate (in various applications)." In a legal context, it signifies "to make amends, make good, repay (again), make restitution, restore, reward." This term is foundational to biblical justice, aiming not just for punishment but for the restoration of the victim to their original state of "wholeness" or "completeness." The profound connection to _shalom_ (peace, completeness) suggests that societal peace is achieved when wrongs are rectified and balance is restored.
* **owner (Hebrew, _baʻal'_):** From H1167, this noun means "a master; hence, a husband, or (figuratively) owner." It denotes the legitimate possessor or lord of the property. The inclusion of "owner" explicitly clarifies the party to whom the restitution is due, emphasizing their inherent right to their property and the keeper's obligation to restore what was lost to its rightful master.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"And if it be stolen from him":** This protasis (the "if" clause) establishes the precise condition under which the keeper's liability is invoked. It specifically refers to the loss of the entrusted animal due to theft, distinguishing this scenario from other forms of loss like natural death or injury (as covered in [Exodus 22:10-11](/exodus/22-10 "Exodus 22:10-11 - Laws Concerning Entrusted Animals")). The phrase "from him" clearly indicates that the theft occurred while the animal was under the care and responsibility of the keeper, implying a failure in their duty to adequately protect the entrusted property.
* **"he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.":** This apodosis (the "then" clause) states the direct legal consequence and the core command. The keeper, despite not being the thief, is held fully accountable for the loss and is legally obligated to compensate the original owner. "Make restitution" signifies the act of restoring the full value of the stolen animal, ensuring that the owner does not suffer financial detriment due to the keeper's failure to prevent the theft. This highlights the strict nature of the duty of care and the paramount importance placed on the owner's property rights within the Israelite legal system.

#### Literary Devices
Exodus 22:12 is a prime example of **Casuistic Law**, a prevalent legal form in the ancient Near East characterized by its "if... then..." structure. This format addresses specific hypothetical cases and prescribes their corresponding legal outcomes, providing a clear framework for judicial decisions and societal order. The verse also demonstrates the principle of **Legal Precedent**, as it establishes a definitive ruling for a particular scenario (theft of entrusted property), which could then be applied to similar situations involving the loss of other entrusted goods. Furthermore, the law implicitly conveys **Responsibility Transfer**, where the burden of loss, despite originating from a third-party criminal act, is ultimately borne by the one who assumed stewardship. This underscores the high value placed on property rights and the diligent execution of entrusted duties within the Israelite legal system, emphasizing that accepting responsibility carries significant obligations.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Exodus 22:12 profoundly illustrates God's unwavering concern for justice, accountability, and the protection of property rights within His covenant community. It reveals that true righteousness extends beyond personal piety to encompass ethical conduct in all social and economic dealings. The principle of restitution, deeply rooted in the Hebrew concept of _shalom_ (wholeness, peace), underscores that divine justice is not merely about punitive measures but fundamentally about making things whole, restoring balance to relationships, and ensuring the well-being of society. This divine mandate for integrity in stewardship reflects God's own character as a faithful and just provider, who expects His people to reflect His attributes in their interactions, fostering trust and order.

* [Leviticus 6:1-5](/leviticus/6-1 "Leviticus 6:1-5 - Laws of Restitution and Guilt Offerings")
* [Proverbs 6:30-31](/proverbs/6-30 "Proverbs 6:30-31 - Consequences of Theft")
* [Luke 19:8](/luke/19-8 "Luke 19:8 - Zacchaeus's Pledge of Restitution")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The ancient law of Exodus 22:12, though specific to an agrarian context, offers profound and timeless principles for contemporary life. It challenges us to deeply consider the gravity of our responsibilities when we are entrusted with anything—be it a tangible possession, a financial resource, a professional task, sensitive information, or even the emotional well-being of another in a relationship. The expectation of restitution in the face of loss, even when not directly caused by our malicious intent, calls us to embrace a higher standard of diligence, integrity, and proactive accountability. It prompts us to move beyond passive custodianship to become active, vigilant stewards of all that has been placed in our care. This principle encourages us to genuinely make amends and seek restoration when our actions, or even our inactions, lead to another's loss or harm, fostering a culture of honesty, responsibility, and restorative justice that prioritizes making things right and preserving the holistic well-being of others.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **What does "stewardship" truly mean in your daily life, extending beyond just financial resources?**
* **In what specific areas of your life are you entrusted with something belonging to another (e.g., a friend's confidence, a company's reputation, a child's spiritual development)? How diligently do you guard it?**
* **How might the principle of "making restitution" apply in situations where the loss isn't material, such as a broken trust, a damaged relationship, or a tarnished reputation?**
* **What concrete steps can you take to cultivate greater diligence, foresight, and accountability in your personal, professional, and spiritual responsibilities?**

### FAQ
**Why is the keeper held responsible for theft, which seems beyond their control?**

Answer: While theft is an external act committed by a third party, the law in [Exodus 22:12](/exodus/22-12 "Exodus 22:12 - Law on Stolen Entrusted Animals") places responsibility on the keeper because accepting entrusted property implies a fundamental duty of diligent care and protection. Unlike cases of natural death or accidental injury where an oath before the Lord might suffice to absolve the keeper (as detailed in [Exodus 22:10-11](/exodus/22-10 "Exodus 22:10-11 - Laws Concerning Entrusted Animals")), theft suggests a failure in the keeper's active safeguarding of the property. This strict liability was designed to ensure that those who took on the role of a keeper were highly motivated to prevent loss, thereby protecting the owner's valuable assets and fostering a strong sense of trust and reliability within the community. It underscores that responsibility is not merely about direct causation but about the diligent fulfillment of an assumed duty and the maintenance of societal order.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While Exodus 22:12 functions as a civil law for ancient Israel, its underlying principles of responsibility, restitution, and the restoration of what is lost find profound and ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The very existence of such laws highlights humanity's inherent failure to perfectly steward what has been entrusted to us, ultimately leading to pervasive loss, brokenness, and the profound alienation caused by sin. Christ, however, stands as the ultimate Restorer and the perfect Steward. He did not merely make restitution for our sins in a legalistic sense; He became the perfect, atoning sacrifice, fully paying the immense debt we owed to God, thereby making us spiritually whole and reconciling us to the Father ([2 Corinthians 5:19](/2_corinthians/5-19 "2 Corinthians 5:19 - God Reconciling the World to Himself")). Through His complete and sufficient work on the cross, Jesus "makes restitution" for the catastrophic damage caused by sin, not just by repaying a debt, but by transforming our very nature and restoring us to a right, vibrant relationship with God ([Romans 5:8-10](/romans/5-8 "Romans 5:8-10 - Reconciliation Through Christ")). Furthermore, the New Testament calls believers, as those who have received Christ's restorative grace, to embody this principle of restorative justice in their own lives, not through legalistic obligation, but through love, forgiveness, and active reconciliation, diligently seeking to make things right with those they have wronged or from whom they have taken ([Matthew 5:23-24](/matthew/5-23 "Matthew 5:23-24 - Reconciliation Before Worship")). In Christ, the demand for perfect restitution is met, and the path to true wholeness and peace (_shalom_) is opened for all who believe and follow Him.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Genesis 31:39

That which was torn [of beasts] I brought not unto thee; I bare the loss of it; of my hand didst thou require it, [whether] stolen by day, or stolen by night.

Exodus 22:7

¶ If a man shall deliver unto his neighbour money or stuff to keep, and it be stolen out of the man's house; if the thief be found, let him pay double.