TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 22:7–15. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
These laws are,
I.Concerning trusts, Exo 22:7-13.
If a man deliver goods, suppose to a carrier to be conveyed, or to a warehouse-keeper to be preserved, or cattle to a farmer to be fed, upon a valuable consideration, and if a special confidence be reposed in the person they are lodged with, in case these goods be stolen or lost, perish or be damaged, if it appear that it was not by any fault of the trustee, the owner must stand to the loss, otherwise he that has been false to this trust must be compelled to make satisfaction. The trustee must aver his innocence upon oath before the judges, if the case was such as afforded no other proof, and they were to determine the matter according as it appeared. This teaches us,
1.That we ought to be very careful of every thing we are entrusted with, as careful of it, though it be another's, as if it were our own. It is unjust and base, and that which all the world cries shame on, to betray a trust.
2.That there is such a general failing of truth and justice upon earth as gives too much occasion to suspect men's honesty whenever it is their interest to be dishonest.
3.That an oath for confirmation is an end of strife, Heb 6:16. It is called an oath for the Lord (Exo 22:11), because to him the appeal is made, not only as to a witness of truth, but as to an avenger of wrong and falsehood. Those that had offered injury to their neighbour by doing any unjust thing, yet, it might be hoped, had not so far debauched their consciences as to profane an oath of the Lord, and call the God of truth to be witness to a lie: perjury is a sin which natural conscience startles at as much as any other. The religion of an oath is very ancient, and a plain indication of the universal belief of a God, and a providence, and a judgment to come.
4.That magistracy is an ordinance of God, designed, among other intentions, to assist men both in discovering rights disputed and recovering rights denied; and great respect ought to be paid to the determination of the judges.
5.That there is no reason why a man should suffer for that which he could not help: masters should consider this, in dealing with their servants, and not rebuke that as a fault which was a mischance, and which they themselves, had they been in their servants' places, could not have prevented.
II.Concerning loans, Exo 22:14, Exo 22:15.
If a man (suppose) lent his team to his neighbour, if the owner was with it, or was to receive profit for the loan of it, whatever harm befel the cattle the owner must stand to the loss of: but if the owner was so kind to the borrower as to lend it to him gratis, and put such a confidence in him as to trust it from under his own eye, then, if any harm happened, the borrower must make it good. Let us learn hence to be very careful not to abuse any thing that is lent us; it is not only unjust, but base and disingenuous, inasmuch as it is rendering evil for good; we should much rather choose to lose ourselves than that any should sustain loss by their kindness to us. Alas, master! for it was borrowed, Kg2 6:5.
Continue studying Exodus 22:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 22:13, nestled within the "Book of the Covenant," articulates a specific legal provision concerning the bailment of animals. It stipulates that if an entrusted animal is violently killed by a wild predator, the caretaker is absolved of liability for its loss, provided they present the torn remains as verifiable evidence. This law underscores God's commitment to just and equitable principles, distinguishing between losses attributable to negligence and those resulting from unavoidable natural forces, thereby preventing undue financial burden on the responsible party and promoting integrity in communal dealings.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 22:13 is situated within the expansive legal framework known as the "Book of the Covenant," which commences at Exodus 20:22 and concludes at Exodus 23:33. This section of Exodus delineates civil and ceremonial laws designed to govern the daily life and social interactions of the Israelite community. Specifically, Exodus 22 focuses on property rights, particularly concerning theft, damage, and responsibility for entrusted goods, with a strong emphasis on livestock. The preceding verses, Exodus 22:10-12, establish the general rules of liability for a bailee (one entrusted with another's property). These verses detail scenarios where an animal dies, is injured, or is stolen while in the caretaker's charge, generally holding the caretaker liable unless they can prove their innocence, often through an oath before the Lord or by demonstrating the theft of the animal. Verse 13 then introduces a crucial and specific exception to this general liability, addressing the unique circumstance of an animal being killed by a wild predator.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was fundamentally an agrarian society, where livestock—including cattle, sheep, goats, and donkeys—represented a significant portion of a family's wealth, sustenance, and economic stability. The practice of entrusting animals to neighbors, relatives, or hired shepherds for grazing, safekeeping, or breeding was a common and necessary aspect of daily life. Given this reliance on animals, clear and equitable laws governing their care and loss were essential for maintaining social order, preventing disputes, and ensuring justice within the community. Furthermore, the geographical landscape of ancient Israel was home to a variety of formidable wild predators, such as lions, bears, wolves, and hyenas, which posed a constant and real threat to flocks and herds. The loss of an animal to such a predator was not an uncommon occurrence. The legal provision in Exodus 22:13 therefore reflects the practical realities of this environment, providing a just framework for resolving conflicts arising from such unavoidable incidents. The emphasis on "bringing it for witness" highlights the critical role of tangible evidence and verifiable proof in ancient Near Eastern legal systems, where oral testimony and physical substantiation were paramount for establishing culpability or innocence.
Key Themes
Exodus 22:13 contributes significantly to several overarching themes found throughout the "Book of the Covenant" and the Pentateuch. Foremost among these is God's unwavering commitment to Justice and Equity. This law meticulously distinguishes between losses caused by human negligence or malfeasance and those resulting from forces beyond human control, demonstrating a divine standard of fairness that seeks to protect both the owner and the caretaker. It establishes a framework for Accountability, ensuring that individuals are responsible for their actions and omissions, but are not unjustly penalized for circumstances truly outside their sphere of influence. The requirement to present evidence ("bring it for witness") underscores the theme of Truth and Verifiable Evidence in legal proceedings, a foundational principle for any just society and a recurring motif in biblical law (e.g., Deuteronomy 19:15). Moreover, the law reflects a profound Pastoral Concern for the vulnerable, recognizing the economic hardship that could result from an unjust ruling and providing a mechanism for relief. These themes collectively paint a picture of God as a righteous legislator who cares deeply about the practical welfare and moral integrity of His covenant people.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word (H2963) is a primitive root meaning "to pluck off or pull to pieces." In this context, it describes a violent, destructive act, typically by a wild animal. The Hebrew text employs an emphatic construction, ṭārop ṭorap (lit. "tearing, it was torn"), which intensifies the meaning, leaving no doubt that the animal suffered a brutal and complete dismemberment by a predator, rather than merely dying naturally or being injured. This emphatic phrasing underscores the severity and undeniable nature of the loss, justifying the exemption from liability.
This term (H5707) refers concretely to a person who testifies or abstractly to the testimony or evidence itself. Here, the torn remains of the animal serve as the tangible, irrefutable "witness" or proof that the animal's demise was due to an attack by a wild beast, not the caretaker's negligence or theft. This highlights the ancient Near Eastern legal principle that claims must be substantiated by concrete evidence, preventing fraudulent claims and ensuring that the exemption is granted only when genuinely warranted.
This verb (H7999) means "to be safe, complete," or causatively, "to make completed." In legal contexts, it signifies "to pay, restore, or make restitution." The phrase "he shall not make good" (in the negative) explicitly states that the caretaker is not obligated to compensate the owner for the lost animal. This exemption is pivotal for the fairness of the law, as it distinguishes between preventable losses (for which restitution would be required) and those truly beyond human control, thereby ensuring that liability is justly applied.
Verse Breakdown
"If it be torn in pieces"
This protasis (the "if" clause) establishes the precise condition under which the subsequent exemption applies. The violent nature of the animal's death, specifically its dismemberment by a predator, is the defining factor. This clause meticulously distinguishes this scenario from other forms of loss, such as natural death, injury, or theft, which would incur different levels of liability for the caretaker under the broader laws of bailment in Exodus 22:10-12. The emphasis is on an external, unavoidable force.
"then let him bring it for witness"
This apodosis (the "then" clause) outlines the crucial procedural requirement for the caretaker to claim the exemption. Absolution is not automatic; the caretaker must provide tangible, verifiable proof. The torn remains of the animal, or perhaps even parts of the attacking beast if available, function as irrefutable evidence. This mandate prevents fraudulent claims and ensures that the exemption is applied only when the circumstances are genuinely beyond the caretaker's control, upholding the principle of truth in legal proceedings.
"and he shall not make good that which was torn"
This final clause states the direct legal consequence: the caretaker is released from the obligation to compensate the owner for the lost animal. This demonstrates the law's profound concern for fairness and equity, recognizing that certain losses are truly beyond a person's reasonable control and should not result in financial penalty. It balances the owner's right to their property with the caretaker's limited responsibility in the face of uncontrollable natural forces.
Literary Devices
Exodus 22:13 is a prime example of Casuistic Law, a common legal formulation in the ancient Near East and throughout the "Book of the Covenant." This structure follows an "if... then..." or "when... then..." pattern, presenting a specific case (the animal being torn) and its corresponding legal ruling (the caretaker's absolution from liability). This format provides clear, case-by-case guidance, making the law practical and accessible. The Hebrew phrase for "torn in pieces," ṭārop ṭorap, employs an emphatic repetition known as the Infinitive Absolute, which serves as a powerful form of Intensification. This linguistic device highlights the violent and undeniable nature of the animal's destruction, thereby justifying the unique exemption. Furthermore, the torn remains themselves function as a Symbol of undeniable truth and concrete evidence, underscoring the legal principle that claims must be substantiated by verifiable facts. This emphasis on tangible proof also reflects the broader biblical principle of Justice, which demands clear evidence before judgment or restitution is imposed, ensuring fairness and preventing false accusations.
Theological and Thematic Connections
This seemingly specific legal statute in Exodus 22:13 reveals profound theological insights into the character of God and His design for human society. It powerfully demonstrates God as a God of justice, equity, and discernment, who meticulously distinguishes between losses caused by human negligence or wrongdoing and those resulting from unavoidable, external forces. This principle of fairness prevents undue burdens and promotes a just social order where individuals are held accountable for what is within their control, but are graciously exempted from liability for what is genuinely beyond it. The requirement to "bring it for witness" underscores the divine emphasis on truth and verifiable evidence in legal proceedings, a foundational principle for any just society. It reflects God's desire for transparency, integrity, and the pursuit of objective facts in human dealings, ensuring that judgments are based on reality, not mere accusations, assumptions, or fraud. This law, therefore, is not merely a pragmatic rule but a reflection of God's perfect righteousness applied to the complexities of human interaction and economic life.
Reflection and Application
The ancient law of Exodus 22:13, while rooted in an agrarian society, offers timeless principles that hold profound relevance for contemporary life. It compels us to reflect on the critical importance of fairness, accountability, and clarity in all our agreements, relationships, and professional dealings. Just as God meticulously provided for equitable treatment in ancient Israel, we are similarly called to establish clear expectations, define responsibilities, and, crucially, make provisions for unforeseen circumstances in our contracts, partnerships, and even personal commitments. The emphasis on "bringing it for witness" serves as a powerful reminder of the enduring value of evidence, documentation, and verifiable truth in an age often characterized by misinformation and unsubstantiated claims. Whether navigating business transactions, legal matters, or resolving personal disputes, relying on objective facts and tangible proof, rather than hearsay, speculation, or assumption, is essential for achieving just outcomes, fostering trust, and maintaining integrity. This verse encourages us to live with integrity, acknowledging our responsibilities while also recognizing the limits of our control, and to extend grace, understanding, and compassion when circumstances truly are beyond another's reasonable prevention.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is "bailment" in the context of this verse, and why was it important for ancient Israel?
Bailment refers to the legal concept of entrusting one's property to another person for a specific purpose, such as safekeeping, use, or care. In ancient Israel, where livestock was a primary form of wealth and livelihood, it was common for owners to entrust their animals to neighbors, family members, or hired shepherds for grazing or protection. Laws governing bailment, like those found in Exodus 22, were crucial for defining responsibilities, preventing disputes, and ensuring fair compensation or exemption in cases of loss or damage. They provided a vital framework for trust, accountability, and economic stability within the community.
Why was it so important for the caretaker to "bring it for witness" if the animal was torn in pieces?
The requirement to "bring it for witness" (i.e., the torn remains of the animal) was absolutely vital to prevent fraud and ensure justice. Without tangible proof, a dishonest caretaker could falsely claim that an animal died from a wild beast attack when, in reality, it might have been sold, stolen due to negligence, or died from a preventable cause. The physical evidence served as irrefutable testimony, demonstrating that the loss was indeed due to an unavoidable, violent act of nature, thereby justifying the exemption from liability. This principle underscores the biblical emphasis on verifiable truth in legal matters, as seen in other laws requiring multiple witnesses (e.g., Deuteronomy 19:15).
Does this law apply only to animals, or are there broader principles for other types of property?
While Exodus 22:13 specifically addresses the loss of an animal, the underlying principle of exemption from liability for losses due to "acts of God" or "force majeure" (events genuinely beyond reasonable human control) is a recurring theme in legal systems throughout history, including modern ones. This principle, that one should not be held accountable for damages truly beyond their ability to prevent, can be broadly applied to various types of property, contractual agreements, and even personal responsibilities. It demonstrates the enduring wisdom, fairness, and practical foresight embedded in God's ancient laws, which seek to establish equitable standards for all human interactions.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 22:13, like all Old Testament laws, serves as a profound revelation of God's perfect standard of justice and the inherent inability of humanity to perfectly uphold it. The law's meticulous demand for accountability and verifiable evidence, even while providing for equitable exemptions, points to the flawless righteousness required by a holy God. In Christ, we encounter the ultimate fulfillment of this law's demands, not through our own perfect "making good" or presentation of flawless "witness," but through His perfect life and atoning sacrifice. We, as fallen humanity, are the "entrusted" ones, given stewardship over life and resources, and often, like the caretaker, we fall short, incurring spiritual debt through our sin. The Law, in its full scope, metaphorically tears us "in pieces" by exposing our sin and our utter inability to "make good" the broken covenant with God. However, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, became the ultimate "torn in pieces" sacrifice. He willingly endured the violence of the cross to bear the full penalty for our failures and transgressions. His broken body and shed blood are the perfect "witness" Hebrews 9:22 to God's just wrath against sin and His boundless mercy. Through faith in Him, we are not required to "make good" our spiritual debt, for Christ has fully paid it, canceling the record of debt that stood against us Colossians 2:14. He is our divine exemption, the one who perfectly fulfilled the law's demands, allowing us to stand righteous before God, not by our own merit or performance, but by His imputed righteousness Romans 3:21-22. In Him, the just requirement of the law is met, and we find peace with God Romans 5:1.