TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 22:7–15. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
These laws are,
I.Concerning trusts, Exo 22:7-13.
If a man deliver goods, suppose to a carrier to be conveyed, or to a warehouse-keeper to be preserved, or cattle to a farmer to be fed, upon a valuable consideration, and if a special confidence be reposed in the person they are lodged with, in case these goods be stolen or lost, perish or be damaged, if it appear that it was not by any fault of the trustee, the owner must stand to the loss, otherwise he that has been false to this trust must be compelled to make satisfaction. The trustee must aver his innocence upon oath before the judges, if the case was such as afforded no other proof, and they were to determine the matter according as it appeared. This teaches us,
1.That we ought to be very careful of every thing we are entrusted with, as careful of it, though it be another's, as if it were our own. It is unjust and base, and that which all the world cries shame on, to betray a trust.
2.That there is such a general failing of truth and justice upon earth as gives too much occasion to suspect men's honesty whenever it is their interest to be dishonest.
3.That an oath for confirmation is an end of strife, Heb 6:16. It is called an oath for the Lord (Exo 22:11), because to him the appeal is made, not only as to a witness of truth, but as to an avenger of wrong and falsehood. Those that had offered injury to their neighbour by doing any unjust thing, yet, it might be hoped, had not so far debauched their consciences as to profane an oath of the Lord, and call the God of truth to be witness to a lie: perjury is a sin which natural conscience startles at as much as any other. The religion of an oath is very ancient, and a plain indication of the universal belief of a God, and a providence, and a judgment to come.
4.That magistracy is an ordinance of God, designed, among other intentions, to assist men both in discovering rights disputed and recovering rights denied; and great respect ought to be paid to the determination of the judges.
5.That there is no reason why a man should suffer for that which he could not help: masters should consider this, in dealing with their servants, and not rebuke that as a fault which was a mischance, and which they themselves, had they been in their servants' places, could not have prevented.
II.Concerning loans, Exo 22:14, Exo 22:15.
If a man (suppose) lent his team to his neighbour, if the owner was with it, or was to receive profit for the loan of it, whatever harm befel the cattle the owner must stand to the loss of: but if the owner was so kind to the borrower as to lend it to him gratis, and put such a confidence in him as to trust it from under his own eye, then, if any harm happened, the borrower must make it good. Let us learn hence to be very careful not to abuse any thing that is lent us; it is not only unjust, but base and disingenuous, inasmuch as it is rendering evil for good; we should much rather choose to lose ourselves than that any should sustain loss by their kindness to us. Alas, master! for it was borrowed, Kg2 6:5.
Continue studying Exodus 22:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 22:14 delineates a crucial civil statute within the Mosaic Covenant, establishing the liability of a borrower for any damage or death incurred by borrowed property while under their care. This law mandates full restitution by the borrower, particularly when the owner is not present at the time of the incident, thereby emphasizing the profound principles of personal responsibility, the sanctity of property rights, and the imperative of integrity in communal dealings. It serves as a foundational element within the comprehensive legal framework designed by God to cultivate justice, trust, and equitable relationships within ancient Israelite society.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 22:14 is embedded within the "Book of the Covenant," a pivotal collection of divine laws found in Exodus 21, Exodus 22, Exodus 23. This section immediately follows the foundational Ten Commandments, transitioning from broad moral principles to specific, practical applications governing daily life in Israel. The laws address a wide array of societal interactions, including personal injury, slavery, and property rights. Specifically, Exodus 22:10-13 deals with the liability of a keeper entrusted with an animal, where certain mitigating circumstances (like theft or natural death) might allow for an oath of innocence. However, Exodus 22:14 introduces a stricter standard for borrowed items, reflecting the direct benefit the borrower receives from the arrangement. The subsequent verses, Exodus 22:15-17, then shift to laws concerning sexual offenses, underscoring the comprehensive nature of the covenantal stipulations that govern both material and moral dimensions of Israelite existence.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was preeminently an agrarian society where livestock (such as oxen, donkeys, and sheep) and essential tools constituted vital assets for livelihood and survival. The practice of borrowing such items from a neighbor for tasks like plowing, transport, or other forms of labor was a common and necessary aspect of community interdependence. However, these arrangements inherently carried risks of damage or loss. The law in Exodus 22:14 specifically addresses the scenario where the borrowed item is harmed or dies while in the borrower's exclusive possession, crucially noting "the owner thereof [being] not with it." This distinction is paramount; if the owner were present, the incident might be construed as a shared risk or even the owner's direct responsibility. The owner's absence places the full burden of meticulous care and liability squarely on the borrower, who directly benefits from the property's use. This provision aligns with broader Near Eastern legal traditions, where property rights were highly esteemed, and legal codes (like the Code of Hammurabi) often included stipulations for borrowed goods, though the Mosaic Law frequently imposed a higher standard of communal responsibility and justice, uniquely rooted in the covenant with Yahweh.
Key Themes
This law contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. Firstly, it highlights Divine Justice and Equity, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for fairness in everyday transactions and His desire to prevent exploitation within the community. Secondly, it underscores Personal Responsibility and Accountability, teaching that individuals are liable for the consequences of their actions and the care of what is entrusted to them. Thirdly, it reinforces the Protection of Property Rights, acknowledging the inherent value of an individual's possessions and providing legal recourse for their loss or damage. Finally, it fosters Community Trust and Integrity, establishing clear expectations for honesty and reliability in neighborly dealings, thereby strengthening the social fabric of the covenant people. These themes collectively reveal a God who is not only concerned with grand theological truths but also with the practical, ethical outworking of righteousness in every aspect of human interaction.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term (H376) refers to a man as an individual or a male person. In this legal context, it signifies any person, highlighting the universal applicability of the law to any individual who engages in the act of borrowing. It underscores that the responsibility is personal and applies to anyone, regardless of status, who initiates such a transaction.
This verb (H7592) means "to inquire; by implication, to request; by extension, to demand; ask (counsel, on), beg, borrow, lay to charge, consult, demand, desire, [idiom] earnestly, enquire, [phrase] greet, obtain leave, lend, pray, request, require, [phrase] salute, [idiom] straitly, [idiom] surely, wish." In the context of Exodus 22:14, it specifically denotes a voluntary transaction initiated by the borrower, implying a request made and the owner's consent to temporarily transfer possession. This act of borrowing establishes a relationship of trust and an implicit agreement for the careful return of the item, setting it apart from theft or accidental finding.
This primitive root (H7665) means "to burst (literally or figuratively); break (down, off, in pieces, up), broken (-hearted), bring to the birth, crush, destroy, hurt, quench, [idiom] quite, tear." In this verse, it indicates that the borrowed item suffered damage or injury, not necessarily resulting in death, but rendering it less valuable, functional, or usable. This covers a spectrum of injuries that might occur due to accident, negligence, or even an attack by another animal, provided the owner was not present.
Derived from the root (H1167) meaning "a master; hence, a husband, or (figuratively) owner." This term designates the rightful possessor of the property, emphasizing their legal claim and authority over the item. The owner's rights are paramount in this law, ensuring that their generosity in lending does not result in personal loss.
This preposition (H5973) means "with (i.e. in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with." The phrase "being not with it" is crucial, signifying that the owner was absent and therefore unable to supervise, protect, or share responsibility for the item. This absence places the full burden of care and liability squarely on the borrower, who had exclusive control and benefited from the item's use.
This primitive root (H7999) means "to be safe (in mind, body or estate); figuratively, to be (causatively, make) completed; by implication, to be friendly; by extension, to reciprocate (in various applications); make amends, (make an) end, finish, full, give again, make good, (re-) pay (again), (make) (to) (be at) peace(-able), that is perfect, perform, (make) prosper(-ous), recompense, render, requite, make restitution, restore, reward, [idiom] surely." In a legal context, shâlam refers to making full restitution or compensation. It implies restoring the owner to their original state before the loss or damage occurred, ensuring that the lender does not suffer financial detriment from their act of generosity. This concept of wholeness, completeness, and restoration is fundamental to biblical justice.
Verse Breakdown
"And if a man borrow [ought] of his neighbour"
This opening clause establishes the specific legal premise: a voluntary agreement wherein one individual requests and receives temporary use of another's property. The term "ought" (as translated in KJV) refers to any item of value, typically livestock or tools in the agrarian context, but the underlying principle extends to any borrowed possession, highlighting a transaction built on trust and mutual agreement.
"and it be hurt, or die"
This specifies the unfortunate outcomes that trigger the borrower's liability. The borrowed item suffers damage ("hurt," implying injury or diminished value) or is completely lost ("die") while under the borrower's care. This covers a spectrum of harm, from minor injury to total destruction, making the borrower accountable for the item's condition.
"the owner thereof [being] not with it"
This is the crucial qualifying condition that delineates the extent of liability. It signifies that the owner was not present to oversee, protect, or share responsibility for the item. The borrower, having exclusive control and deriving direct benefit from the item's use, therefore assumes full and unmitigated liability for its well-being during the period of the owner's absence. This distinguishes it from scenarios where the owner's presence might imply shared risk or a different level of negligence.
"he shall surely make [it] good"
This is the definitive verdict and the command for restitution. The Hebrew emphasizes the certainty and completeness of the compensation through an intensive verbal construction. The borrower is unequivocally obligated to fully restore the value of the damaged or lost item to the owner, ensuring the lender is not penalized for their act of kindness. This "making good" could involve replacing the item, paying its full market value, or compensating for the specific damage incurred, all with the aim of restoring the owner to their original state.
Literary Devices
The legal formulation in Exodus 22:14 is a quintessential example of Casuistic Law, characterized by its "if... then..." structure. This type of law addresses specific cases and outlines the precise legal consequences for each scenario, providing clear, actionable guidance for judicial decisions and ethical conduct within the community. The meticulous precision of the language, particularly the crucial qualifying phrase "the owner thereof [being] not with it," demonstrates profound Legal Precision. This careful delineation of the exact circumstances under which full liability applies prevents ambiguity, ensuring that justice is administered fairly and consistently based on the precise conditions of the incident. Furthermore, the concluding phrase "he shall surely make it good" employs Emphasis through the use of an intensive verbal construction in Hebrew. This linguistic device powerfully underscores the absolute, non-negotiable nature of the required restitution, reinforcing the seriousness of the borrower's responsibility and the covenantal commitment to restoring what is lost or damaged to its rightful owner.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 22:14 profoundly illustrates God's unwavering concern for justice, integrity, and the protection of property rights within the covenant community. It articulates a fundamental principle of personal responsibility, teaching that those who benefit from another's generosity must also bear the burden of diligent care and full accountability. The concept of "making good" (שָׁלֵם, shalem) carries deep theological resonance, reflecting God's own character as one who restores, makes whole, and brings to completion. This law mandates that relationships within the community be characterized by honesty, fairness, and a commitment to preventing exploitation, thereby fostering a climate of trust and mutual respect. This statute, like many others within the Book of the Covenant, reveals a God who is not merely concerned with abstract theological concepts but is meticulously involved in the practical, daily outworking of righteousness, ensuring that even seemingly mundane transactions reflect the values and standards of His holy kingdom.
Reflection and Application
The timeless principles embedded in Exodus 22:14 transcend their ancient Israelite context, offering profound and enduring lessons for contemporary life. At its core, this verse calls us to embrace a high standard of stewardship, integrity, and accountability in all our dealings. Whether we borrow a physical item, utilize a company resource, or are entrusted with a significant responsibility, the underlying principle remains constant: we are morally and often legally accountable for its careful preservation. This demands exercising diligence, foresight, and a profound respect for what belongs to others. If, through our negligence, carelessness, or even unavoidable circumstances while under our direct care, something borrowed is harmed or lost, the moral and spiritual imperative is to "make it good." This is not merely a legal obligation but a reflection of a heart that values justice, honesty, and the well-being of our neighbor. It compels us to be people of our word, to honor agreements, and to prioritize reconciliation and restoration when things go awry, fostering healthy and trustworthy relationships within our communities.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is the owner's absence a critical factor in the borrower's liability in Exodus 22:14?
The owner's absence is a crucial determinant because it signifies that the borrower had exclusive control and full responsibility over the borrowed item at the time of the incident. If the owner were present, the situation might imply shared risk, or the owner might have been able to intervene to prevent the damage or death. The law in Exodus 22:14 specifically distinguishes this scenario from cases where an animal is merely entrusted to a neighbor for safekeeping (as in Exodus 22:10-13), where liability might be mitigated by factors like theft by a third party or an "act of God" if the keeper could swear an oath of innocence. For a borrowed item, the borrower directly benefits from its use, and thus assumes a higher, more stringent degree of care and liability when the owner is not supervising.
Does "make it good" mean replacing the item, or paying its value?
"Make it good" (שָׁלֵם, shalem) implies full and complete restitution, aiming to restore the owner to the precise position they were in before the loss or damage occurred. This could mean replacing the item with an identical or equivalent one, or, more commonly, paying its full market value. If the item was merely "hurt" (injured) but not dead, it would mean compensating for the diminished value or covering the cost of its repair or healing. The overarching goal is always to ensure that the lender suffers no financial loss whatsoever due to their act of generosity, upholding the integrity of the transaction and the well-being of the community member.
How does this ancient law relate to modern concepts of insurance or liability?
While the specific mechanisms and societal structures differ vastly, the underlying principles of Exodus 22:14 resonate profoundly with modern concepts of liability and responsibility. Just as ancient borrowers were held accountable for items in their care, contemporary legal systems assign liability for damages caused by negligence, misuse, or even unavoidable accidents involving borrowed or rented property. Insurance, in essence, serves as a modern mechanism to mitigate the financial risk associated with such liabilities, allowing for compensation when damage or loss occurs. The core principle remains consistent across millennia: those who use or benefit from another's property bear a significant responsibility for its safekeeping and for making appropriate restitution if harm occurs, reflecting a universal ethical demand for accountability.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 22:14, with its emphasis on restitution and the imperative to "make good" what has been damaged or lost, finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. While the Mosaic law mandates human responsibility for borrowed property, it simultaneously points to a deeper, spiritual reality of a debt humanity incurred, a debt we could never repay. Humanity "borrowed" life, stewardship, and a relationship with God, yet through sin, we gravely "hurt" and "lost" our pristine connection with Him, incurring a spiritual debt that led inevitably to death (Romans 6:23). We were utterly unable to "make it good" ourselves, for the divine Owner was not "with" us in our fallen state in the sense of being complicit, yet His perfect standard of justice remained.
Jesus Christ, the perfect Son of God, stepped into this impossible chasm. He became the ultimate "Restorer" who came to "make good" what was irrevocably broken by sin. Through His sinless life, His obedient and sacrificial death on the cross, and His glorious resurrection, He paid the infinite debt we owed, perfectly fulfilling the righteous demands of the Law (Matthew 5:17). He willingly took upon Himself the "hurt" and "death" of humanity's sin, offering His own life as the perfect, unblemished sacrifice (2 Corinthians 5:21). In Christ, God Himself provides the means for complete reconciliation and restoration, making us spiritually whole and bringing us back into a right, living relationship with Him (Colossians 1:19-20). Thus, the principle of restitution in Exodus 22:14 powerfully foreshadows the magnificent truth that in Christ, God has "made good" the ultimate loss, restoring eternal life and hope to all who believe.