Exodus 22:15
[But] if the owner thereof [be] with it, he shall not make [it] good: if it [be] an hired [thing], it came for his hire.
But if the owner {H1167} thereof be with it, he shall not make it good {H7999}: if it be an hired {H7916} thing, it came {H935} for his hire {H7939}.
If the owner was present, he need not make good the loss. If the owner hired it out, the loss is covered by the hiring fee.
If the owner was present, no restitution is required. If the animal was rented, the fee covers the loss.
If the owner thereof be with it, he shall not make it good: if it be a hired thing, it came for its hire.
Cross-References
-
Zechariah 8:10
For before these days there was no hire for man, nor any hire for beast; neither [was there any] peace to him that went out or came in because of the affliction: for I set all men every one against his neighbour.
Commentary
Exodus 22:15 continues the discussion of legal principles concerning borrowed or entrusted property within the Mosaic Law, specifically addressing exceptions to liability for damage or loss. This verse highlights situations where the borrower or keeper of an animal or item is not required to make restitution, emphasizing principles of shared risk and the nature of a hired agreement.
Context
This verse is part of a series of civil laws found in Exodus 21-23, often referred to as the "Book of the Covenant." These statutes elaborate on the Ten Commandments, providing practical applications for daily life in ancient Israel. Specifically, Exodus 22:10-15 deals with cases involving animals entrusted to a neighbor for keeping, borrowing, or hiring. The preceding verses establish the general rule that if an entrusted animal is injured or dies without the keeper's fault (e.g., by wild beasts), an oath before the Lord absolves them (see Exodus 22:10-11). However, if it was stolen while with the keeper, restitution was required (Exodus 22:12). Verse 15 then presents two specific scenarios where the keeper is exempt from liability, adding nuance to the legal framework.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The Hebrew term for "hired thing" (ืฉึธืืึดืืจ - sฤkhรฎr) refers to something rented or hired, and the phrase "it came for his hire" (ืึผึธื ืึผึดืฉืึฐืึธืจืึน - bฤ' biลkฤrรด) essentially means "it came within the scope of its hire" or "its loss/damage is covered by its rental fee." This highlights the contractual nature of the agreement, where the payment inherently includes acceptance of certain risks by the owner for the use of their property.
Cross-References & Connections
The principles outlined here resonate with broader biblical themes of responsibility and fair dealings. Similar concepts of liability and restitution for property are found throughout the Mosaic Law. The idea that a hired fee covers risk can be seen as a precursor to modern contractual agreements, where consideration is given for goods or services. These laws emphasize community welfare and the importance of integrity in all transactions, a theme echoed in Proverbs 11:1 regarding honest dealings.
Practical Application
Though these laws pertain to ancient agricultural society, the underlying principles remain relevant. They teach us about:
Conclusion
Exodus 22:15 provides specific exemptions to the general rule of restitution for damaged or lost property, based on the owner's presence or the item being a hired good. It reflects the practical wisdom and equitable nature of the Mosaic Law, establishing principles of shared risk and contractual understanding that remain foundational to just interactions.
Please remember that only the commentary section is AI-generated. The main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are sourced from trusted and verified materials.