TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Kings 22:1–14. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Though Ahab continued under guilt and wrath, and the dominion of the lusts to which he had sold himself, yet, as a reward for his professions of repentance and humiliation, though the time drew near when he should descend into battle and perish, yet we have him blessed with a three years' peace (Kg1 22:1) and an honourable visit made him by Jehoshaphat king of Judah, Kg1 22:2. The Jews have a fabulous conceit, that when Ahab humbled himself for his sin, and lay in sackcloth, he sent for Jehoshaphat to come to him, to chastise him; and that he staid with him for some time, and gave him so many stripes every day. This is a groundless tradition. He came now, it is probable, to consult him about the affairs of their kingdoms. It is strange that so great a man as Jehoshaphat would pay so much respect to a kingdom revolted from the house of David, and that so good a man should show so much kindness to a king revolted from the worship of God. But, though he was a godly man, his temper was too easy, which betrayed him into snares and inconveniences. The Syrians durst not give Ahab any disturbance. But,
I.Ahab here meditates a war against the Syrians, and advises concerning it with those about him, Kg1 22:3.
The king of Syria gave him the provocation; when he lay at his mercy, he promised to restore him his cities (Kg1 20:34), and Ahab foolishly took his word, when he ought not to have dismissed him till the cities were put into his possession. But now he knows by experience, what he ought before to have considered, that as the kisses, so the promises, of an enemy are deceitful, and there is no confidence to be put in leagues extorted by distress. Benhadad is one of those princes that think themselves bound by their word no further and no longer than it is for their interest. Whether any other cities were restored we do not find, but Ramoth-Gilead was not, a considerable city in the tribe of Gad, on the other side Jordan, a Levites' city, and one of the cities of refuge. Ahab blames himself, and his people, that they did not bestir themselves to recover it out of the hands of the Syrians, and to chastise Ben-hadad's violation of his league; and resolves to let that ungrateful perfidious prince know that as he had given him peace he could give him trouble. Ahab has a good cause, yet succeeds not. Equity is not to be judged of by prosperity.
II.He engages Jehoshaphat, and draws him in, to join with him in this expedition, for the recovery of Ramoth-Gilead, Kg1 22:4.
And here I do not wonder that Ahab should desire the assistance of so pious and prosperous a neighbour. Even bad men have often coveted the friendship of the good. It is desirable to have an interest in those that have an interest in heaven, and to have those with us that have God with them. But it is strange that Jehoshaphat will go so entirely into Ahab's interests as to say, I am as thou art, and my people as thy people. I hope not; Jehoshaphat and his people are not so wicked and corrupt as Ahab and his people. Too great a complaisance to evildoers has brought many good people, through unwariness, into a dangerous fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness. Jehoshaphat had like to have paid dearly for his compliment when, in battle, he was taken for Ahab. Yet some observe that in joining with Israel against Syria he atoned for his father's fault in joining with Syria against Israel, Kg1 15:19, Kg1 15:20.
III.At the special instance and request of Jehoshaphat, he asks counsel of the prophets concerning this expedition.
Ahab thought it enough to consult with his statesmen, but Jehoshaphat moves that they should enquire of the word of the Lord, Kg1 22:5. Note,
1.Whithersoever a good man goes he desires to take God along with him, and will acknowledge him in all his ways, ask leave of him, and look up to him for success.
2.Whithersoever a good man goes he ought to take his religion along with him, and not be ashamed to own it, no, not when he is with those who have no kindness for it. Jehoshaphat has not left behind him, at Jerusalem, his affection, his veneration, for the word of the Lord, but both avows it and endeavours to introduce it into Ahab's court. If Ahab drew him into his wars, he will draw Ahab into his devotions.
IV.Ahab's 400 prophets, the standing regiment he had of them (prophets of the groves they called them), agreed to encourage him in this expedition and to assure him of success, Kg1 22:6. He put the question to them with a seeming fairness: Shall I go or shall I forbear? But they knew which way his inclination was and designed only to humour the two kings. To please Jehoshaphat, they made use of the name Jehovah: He shall deliver it into the hand of the king; they stole the word from the true prophets (Jer 23:30) and spoke their language. To please Ahab they said, Go up. They had indeed probabilities on their side: Ahab had, not long since, beaten the Syrians twice; he had now a good cause, and was much strengthened by his alliance with Jehoshaphat. But they pretended to speak by prophecy, not by rational conjecture, by divine, not human, foresight: "Thou shalt certainly recover Ramoth-Gilead." Zedekiah, a leading man among these prophets, in imitation of the true prophets, illustrated his false prophecy with a sign, Kg1 22:11. He made himself a pair of iron horns, representing the two kings, and their honour and power (both of which were signified by horns, exaltation and force), and with these the Syrians must be pushed. All the prophets agreed, as one man, that Ahab should return from this expedition a conqueror, Kg1 22:12. Unity is not always the mark of a true church and a true ministry. Here were 400 men that prophesied with one mind and one mouth, and yet all in an error.
V.Jehoshaphat cannot relish this sort of preaching; it is not like what he was used to.
The false prophets cannot so mimic the true but that he who had spiritual senses exercised could discern the fallacy, and therefore he enquired for a prophet of the Lord besides, Kg1 22:7. He is too much of a courtier to say any thing by way of reflection on the king's chaplains, but he waits to see a prophet of the Lord, intimating that he could not look upon these to be so. They seemed to be somewhat (whatever they were, it made no matter to him), but, in conference, they added nothing to him, they gave him no satisfaction, Gal 2:6. One faithful prophet of the Lord was worth them all.
VI.Ahab has another, but one he hates, Micaiah by name, and, to please Jehoshaphat, he is willing to have him sent for, Kg1 22:8-10.
Ahab owned that they might enquire of the Lord by him, that he was a true prophet, and one that knew God's mind. And yet,
1.He hated him, and was not ashamed to own to the king of Judah that he did so, and to give this for a reason. He doth not prophesy good concerning me, but evil. And whose fault was that? If Ahab had done well, he would have heard nothing but good from heaven; if he do ill, he may thank himself for all the uneasiness which the reproofs and threats of God's word gave him. Note, Those are wretchedly hardened in sin, and are ripening apace for ruin, who hate God's ministers because they deal plainly with them and faithfully warn them of their misery and danger by reason of sin, and reckon those their enemies that tell them the truth.
2.He had (it should seem) imprisoned him; for, when he committed him (Kg1 22:26), he bade the officer carry him back, namely, to the place whence he came. We may suppose that this was he that reproved him for his clemency to Ben-hadad (Kg1 20:38, etc.) and for so doing was cast into prison, where he had lain these three years. This was the reason why Ahab knew where to find him so readily, Kg1 22:9. But his imprisonment had not excluded him for divine visits: the spirit of prophecy continued with him there. He was bound, but the word of the Lord was not. Nor did it in the lease abate his courage, nor make him less confident or faithful in delivering his message. Jehoshaphat gave too gentle a reproof to Ahab for expressing his indignation against a faithful prophet: Let not the king say so, Kg1 22:8. He should have said, "Thou art unjust to the prophet, unkind to thyself, and puttest an affront upon his Lord and thine, in saying so." Such sinners as Ahab must be rebuked sharply. However he so far yielded to the reproof that, for fear of provoking Jehoshaphat to break off from his alliance with him, he orders Micaiah to be sent for with all speed, Kg1 22:9. The two kings sat each in their robes and chairs of state, in the gate of Samaria, ready to receive this poor prophet, and to hear what he had to say; for many will give God's word the hearing that will not lend it an obedient ear. They were attended with a crowd of flattering prophets, that could not think of prophesying any thing but what was very sweet and very smooth to two such glorious princes now in confederacy. Those that love to be flattered shall not want flatterers.
VII.Micaiah is pressed by the officer that fetches him to follow the cry, Kg1 22:13.
That officer was unworthy the name of an Israelite who pretended to prescribe to a prophet; but he thought him altogether such a one as the rest, who studied to please men and not God. He told Micaiah how unanimous the other prophets were in foretelling the king's good success, how agreeable it was to the king, intimating that it was his interest to say as they said - he might thereby gain, not only enlargement, but preferment. Those that dote upon worldly things themselves think every body else should do so too, and true or false, right or wrong, speak and act for their secular interest only. He intimated likewise that it would be to no purpose to contradict such a numerous and unanimous vote; he would be ridiculed, as affecting a foolish singularity, if he should. But Micaiah, who knows better things, protests, and backs his protestation with an oath, that he will deliver his message from God with all faithfulness, whether it be pleasing or displeasing to his prince (Kg1 22:14): "What the Lord saith to me, that will I speak, without addition, diminution, or alteration." This was nobly resolved, and as became one who had his eye to a greater King than either of these, arrayed with brighter robes, and sitting on a higher throne.
Continue studying 1 Kings 22:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Kings 22:10 meticulously establishes the formal and solemn setting for a pivotal consultation between King Ahab of Israel and King Jehoshaphat of Judah. Convening in a public, open space—specifically, the threshing floor at the entrance of the gate of Samaria—the two monarchs sat each on his throne, adorned in their royal robes. This scene sets the stage for a critical inquiry into divine will, as a multitude of prophets gathered before them to deliver their pronouncements concerning the impending military campaign against Ramoth-Gilead, underscoring the gravity of the national decision and the ancient practice of seeking prophetic counsel.
Context
Literary Context
This verse serves as the dramatic and highly formalized introduction to one of the Old Testament's most profound examinations of true versus false prophecy. Immediately preceding this scene, King Ahab, having been urged by Jehoshaphat to inquire of the Lord before engaging in battle, has gathered his court prophets. The detailed description of the kings' posture, attire, and location in 1 Kings 22:10 elevates the impending prophetic encounter to a state affair of immense public and spiritual significance. It directly sets up the subsequent narrative where 400 prophets deliver a unified, yet ultimately deceptive, message of victory, which is then starkly contrasted by the solitary, unpopular, but truthful prophecy of Micaiah ben Imlah. The formality of this verse underscores the high stakes: the lives of kings, the fate of nations, and the very integrity of divine revelation are about to be tested in a very public arena.
Historical & Cultural Context
In the ancient Near East, city gates were far more than mere entry points; they were the vibrant epicenters of civic life. Functioning as marketplaces, judicial courts, administrative centers, and public assembly grounds, the gate area was where significant communal decisions were made and publicly declared. The "threshing floor" (Hebrew: goren), often a large, open, paved area located just outside or near the city gate, was primarily for agricultural processing but frequently served as an ideal venue for large public gatherings due to its open space and accessibility. The act of kings sitting "each on his throne, having put on their robes" was a universally recognized symbol of formal authority, royal dignity, and the official nature of the proceedings. Prophets, in Israelite society, held a unique and crucial role as divine intermediaries, delivering God's messages to kings and the populace, particularly concerning matters of national policy, war, and justice. This scene accurately reflects the cultural expectation that major state decisions, especially military campaigns, would be preceded by an inquiry into the divine will, often through prophetic pronouncements.
Key Themes
1 Kings 22:10 introduces and underscores several critical themes that permeate the entire chapter and resonate throughout biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Royal Authority and Responsibility, as two monarchs, representing their respective kingdoms, convene to make a weighty decision concerning war, emphasizing the profound burden of leadership and the imperative for divine guidance. Secondly, it immediately foregrounds the Role of Prophets and the Challenge of Prophetic Discernment. The presence of "all the prophets" sets the stage for a dramatic test of authenticity, raising the crucial question of how to distinguish true prophecy from false, a theme central to the subsequent narrative and a recurring concern in Israel's history (Deuteronomy 13:1-5). Finally, the "void place in the entrance of the gate of Samaria" symbolizes a Public Forum for Truth and Deception, where the spiritual battle for the kings' souls and the nation's future will be publicly waged, illustrating the perennial challenge of discerning God's true voice amidst popular consensus, political pressure, or self-serving counsel, a challenge that echoes warnings found in Jeremiah 14:14.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
The KJV translation "void place" can be somewhat misleading, suggesting an empty or desolate area. The Hebrew word גֹּרֶן (gôren) literally refers to a "threshing-floor." This was typically an open, flat, and often circular area, sometimes paved, used for the threshing of grain. Its common location near the city gate made it a natural and frequently utilized site for public assemblies, judicial proceedings, and official pronouncements due to its accessibility and open nature. Therefore, far from being "void," it was a bustling, communal, and highly visible public space, perfectly suited for a royal consultation and the delivery of prophetic declarations.
The Hebrew word כִּסֵּא (kiççêʼ) denotes a seat of authority, specifically a throne. The mention of both kings sitting "each on his throne" powerfully emphasizes their sovereign power, the extreme formality of the occasion, and the official nature of the inquiry. It signifies that this was not a casual or private meeting, but a high-level state affair, imbued with the full weight of their royal offices and the expectations of their respective kingdoms.
The term נָבִיא (nâbîyʼ) refers to an inspired individual, one who speaks on behalf of God, acting as His mouthpiece or herald. In this context, "all the prophets" suggests a significant number, likely comprising the official court prophets of King Ahab. Their collective presence and immediate "prophesying" indicate a customary practice of seeking divine counsel before military campaigns. However, the subsequent narrative in 1 Kings 22 dramatically reveals the critical distinction between true and false prophets, highlighting that not all who claim to speak for God truly deliver His message.
Verse Breakdown
"And the king of Israel and Jehoshaphat the king of Judah sat each on his throne"
This opening clause immediately introduces the two central figures—King Ahab of Israel and King Jehoshaphat of Judah—and establishes their authoritative posture. Their individual seating "on his throne" underscores their distinct royal authority and the formal, official nature of their joint consultation, signifying a weighty matter of state.
"having put on their robes"
The act of donning royal robes further accentuates the formality, solemnity, and public nature of the occasion. These garments were potent symbols of their office, power, and status, indicating that the proceedings were official state business and not a private or informal discussion.
"in a void place in the entrance of the gate of Samaria"
This phrase precisely locates the assembly. As clarified in the "Key Word Analysis," the "void place" is more accurately understood as the threshing floor, a public, open area commonly situated at the city gate. Samaria, as the capital of the northern kingdom of Israel, provided a central and highly visible location for such an important gathering, ensuring public witness to the events.
"and all the prophets prophesied before them"
This final clause introduces the central activity of the scene: the collective declaration of the prophets. The phrase "all the prophets" implies a large group, likely the court prophets in Ahab's employ, who immediately began to deliver their messages. This sets the stage for the dramatic conflict between their unified, yet ultimately false, message and the solitary, true word of Micaiah, which will soon follow.
Literary Devices
1 Kings 22:10 masterfully employs Setting to establish a solemn, formal, and public atmosphere, immediately conveying the gravity of the impending decision. The choice of the threshing floor at the city gate of Samaria, a bustling hub of civic life, underscores that this was a formal, state-level inquiry, not a private consultation. This Setting also functions as a symbolic arena where truth and deception will publicly contend for the allegiance of the kings and the nation. Furthermore, the verse utilizes Foreshadowing by introducing "all the prophets" who immediately "prophesied before them." This collective, seemingly unified prophetic voice subtly foreshadows the dramatic conflict that will ensue when Micaiah, the lone true prophet, stands against this multitude, highlighting the critical theme of discerning true prophecy amidst a chorus of false voices. The kings' "robes" and "thrones" also serve as powerful Symbolism, representing their royal authority, the formality of the occasion, and the weighty responsibility they bore in seeking divine counsel for their kingdoms.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Kings 22:10 is a foundational verse for understanding the critical importance of discerning divine truth, especially in matters of leadership and national direction. It highlights the inherent danger when leaders, even those with good intentions like Jehoshaphat, align themselves with those who disregard God's revealed will. The assembly of prophets, seemingly offering divine guidance, sets the stage for a profound theological lesson: not all who claim to speak for God are true prophets, and popular consensus does not equate to divine truth. This scene underscores the responsibility of leaders to seek genuine divine counsel and to possess the spiritual discernment to distinguish it from flattery, political expediency, or outright deception. It also reminds the reader that God's truth often comes through a solitary, unpopular voice, challenging prevailing norms and comfortable lies, ultimately calling for a steadfast commitment to God's word above all other voices.
Reflection and Application
The scene at the gate of Samaria, where kings sit robed and prophets speak, carries profound implications for contemporary life. It compels us to critically examine the sources of counsel we seek for significant decisions, whether personal, familial, or communal. Just as Ahab and Jehoshaphat were confronted with a multitude of voices, some speaking truth and others deception, we too navigate a world saturated with information, opinions, and "prophecies" from various sources—media, social circles, self-help gurus, and even religious leaders. This narrative challenges us to cultivate spiritual discernment, to test every spirit and every word against the unchanging standard of God's revealed truth in Scripture. It warns against the dangers of seeking counsel that merely confirms our desires or aligns with popular opinion, rather than challenging us with uncomfortable truths. Ultimately, it calls us to prioritize God's wisdom, even when it comes through an unexpected or unpopular voice, and to recognize that true wisdom often involves separating ourselves from ungodly influences and alliances that compromise our walk with the Lord and our commitment to His kingdom.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was the "void place" (threshing floor) at the city gate a significant location for this royal consultation?
The "void place," more accurately translated as "threshing floor" (Hebrew: goren), was a highly significant location for this royal consultation because of its multi-functional role in ancient Near Eastern cities. Located at the "entrance of the gate of Samaria," it was a public, open, and accessible area. City gates served as the primary hub for civic life, including commerce, judicial proceedings, and official assemblies. By holding the consultation on the threshing floor at the gate, the kings ensured that the proceedings were public, formal, and transparent to the citizens. This setting underscored the gravity of the decision regarding the military campaign against Ramoth-Gilead and allowed for a public display of the prophetic inquiry, setting the stage for the dramatic confrontation between true and false prophecy that would soon unfold before the entire community. It was a place where justice was administered and important communal decisions were made, making it a fitting stage for a national inquiry into the will of the Lord, as seen in 1 Kings 22:10-28.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Kings 22:10 describes an Old Testament scene of kings seeking prophetic counsel, it powerfully foreshadows the ultimate King and Prophet, Jesus Christ, and the nature of true divine revelation. The scene at the gate of Samaria, with its multitude of false prophets and the solitary voice of truth, finds its ultimate contrast and fulfillment in Jesus. Unlike the deceptive prophets who spoke "a lying spirit" (1 Kings 22:23), Jesus is the very Word of God incarnate (John 1:1), the Prophet par excellence whom Moses foretold (Deuteronomy 18:15). He does not merely speak God's word; He is God's Word, full of grace and truth (John 1:14). The kings sought counsel from fallible prophets; humanity's greatest need was met by the perfect King, who sits on an eternal throne, not in a temporary threshing floor, but at the right hand of the Father (Hebrews 1:8). The challenge of discerning true prophecy in 1 Kings 22 ultimately points to the singular, unmistakable truth found in Christ, who is "the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6), and whose words are spirit and life (John 6:63). He is the true and faithful witness (Revelation 3:14), providing ultimate guidance and judgment, unlike the flawed and often deceptive human prophets of old.