1 Kings 22:7
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וַיֹּאמֶרvai·Yo·merand he saidH559Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecImperf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculineוַandיֹּאמֶרhe said
- יְהוֹשָׁפָטye·Ho·o·sha·FatJehoshaphatH3092N-proper-mNoun Proper Masculine
- הַאֵיןha·'Ein¿ [is] there notH369Interrog ¦ N-mscNoun Singular Masculine Constructהַ¿אֵין[is] there not
- פֹּהpohhereH6311AdvAdverb
- נָבִיאna·Vi'a prophetH5030N-msNoun Singular Masculine Absolute
- לַיהוָהla·Yah·wehof YahwehH3068Prep-l ¦ N-properNoun Proper TitleלַofיהוָהYahweh
- עוֹדodstillH5750Adj-msAdjective Numerical Singular Masculine Absolute
- וְנִדְרְשָׁהve·nid·re·Shahso we may enquireH1875Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-Imperf-1cpVerb Qal Imperfect 1st Plural common genderוְsoנִדְרְשָׁהwe may enquire
- מֵאוֹתוֹme·'o·Tofrom [obj.] himH853Prep-m ¦ DirObjM ¦ 3msParticle Object Indicatorמֵfromאוֹת[obj.]וֹhim
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers 1 Kings 22:1–14. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
Though Ahab continued under guilt and wrath, and the dominion of the lusts to which he had sold himself, yet, as a reward for his professions of repentance and humiliation, though the time drew near when he should descend into battle and perish, yet we have him blessed with a three years' peace (1 Kings 22:1) and an honourable visit made him by Jehoshaphat king of Judah, 1 Kings 22:2. The Jews have a fabulous conceit, that when Ahab humbled himself for his sin, and lay in sackcloth, he sent for Jehoshaphat to come to him, to chastise him; and that he staid with him for some time, and gave him so many stripes every day. This is a groundless tradition. He came now, it is probable, to consult him about the affairs of their kingdoms. It is strange that so great a man as Jehoshaphat would pay so much respect to a kingdom revolted from the house of David, and that so good a man should show so much kindness to a king revolted from the worship of God. But, though he was a godly man, his temper was too easy, which betrayed him into snares and inconveniences. The Syrians durst not give Ahab any disturbance. But,
I.Ahab here meditates a war against the Syrians, and advises concerning it with those about him, 1 Kings 22:3.
The king of Syria gave him the provocation; when he lay at his mercy, he promised to restore him his cities (1 Kings 20:34), and Ahab foolishly took his word, when he ought not to have dismissed him till the cities were put into his possession. But now he knows by experience, what he ought before to have considered, that as the kisses, so the promises, of an enemy are deceitful, and there is no confidence to be put in leagues extorted by distress. Benhadad is one of those princes that think themselves bound by their word no further and no longer than it is for their interest. Whether any other cities were restored we do not find, but Ramoth-Gilead was not, a considerable city in the tribe of Gad, on the other side Jordan, a Levites' city, and one of the cities of refuge. Ahab blames himself, and his people, that they did not bestir themselves to recover it out of the hands of the Syrians, and to chastise Ben-hadad's violation of his league; and resolves to let that ungrateful perfidious prince know that as he had given him peace he could give him trouble. Ahab has a good cause, yet succeeds not. Equity is not to be judged of by prosperity.
II.He engages Jehoshaphat, and draws him in, to join with him in this expedition, for the recovery of Ramoth-Gilead, 1 Kings 22:4.
And here I do not wonder that Ahab should desire the assistance of so pious and prosperous a neighbour. Even bad men have often coveted the friendship of the good. It is desirable to have an interest in those that have an interest in heaven, and to have those with us that have God with them. But it is strange that Jehoshaphat will go so entirely into Ahab's interests as to say, I am as thou art, and my people as thy people. I hope not; Jehoshaphat and his people are not so wicked and corrupt as Ahab and his people. Too great a complaisance to evildoers has brought many good people, through unwariness, into a dangerous fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness. Jehoshaphat had like to have paid dearly for his compliment when, in battle, he was taken for Ahab. Yet some observe that in joining with Israel against Syria he atoned for his father's fault in joining with Syria against Israel, 1 Kings 15:19, 1 Kings 15:20.
III.At the special instance and request of Jehoshaphat, he asks counsel of the prophets concerning this expedition.
Ahab thought it enough to consult with his statesmen, but Jehoshaphat moves that they should enquire of the word of the Lord, 1 Kings 22:5. Note,
1.Whithersoever a good man goes he desires to take God along with him, and will acknowledge him in all his ways, ask leave of him, and look up to him for success.
2.Whithersoever a good man goes he ought to take his religion along with him, and not be ashamed to own it, no, not when he is with those who have no kindness for it. Jehoshaphat has not left behind him, at Jerusalem, his affection, his veneration, for the word of the Lord, but both avows it and endeavours to introduce it into Ahab's court. If Ahab drew him into his wars, he will draw Ahab into his devotions.
IV.Ahab's 400 prophets, the standing regiment he had of them (prophets of the groves they called them), agreed to encourage him in this expedition and to assure him of success, 1 Kings 22:6. He put the question to them with a seeming fairness: Shall I go or shall I forbear? But they knew which way his inclination was and designed only to humour the two kings. To please Jehoshaphat, they made use of the name Jehovah: He shall deliver it into the hand of the king; they stole the word from the true prophets (Jeremiah 23:30) and spoke their language. To please Ahab they said, Go up. They had indeed probabilities on their side: Ahab had, not long since, beaten the Syrians twice; he had now a good cause, and was much strengthened by his alliance with Jehoshaphat. But they pretended to speak by prophecy, not by rational conjecture, by divine, not human, foresight: "Thou shalt certainly recover Ramoth-Gilead." Zedekiah, a leading man among these prophets, in imitation of the true prophets, illustrated his false prophecy with a sign, 1 Kings 22:11. He made himself a pair of iron horns, representing the two kings, and their honour and power (both of which were signified by horns, exaltation and force), and with these the Syrians must be pushed. All the prophets agreed, as one man, that Ahab should return from this expedition a conqueror, 1 Kings 22:12. Unity is not always the mark of a true church and a true ministry. Here were 400 men that prophesied with one mind and one mouth, and yet all in an error.
V.Jehoshaphat cannot relish this sort of preaching; it is not like what he was used to.
The false prophets cannot so mimic the true but that he who had spiritual senses exercised could discern the fallacy, and therefore he enquired for a prophet of the Lord besides, 1 Kings 22:7. He is too much of a courtier to say any thing by way of reflection on the king's chaplains, but he waits to see a prophet of the Lord, intimating that he could not look upon these to be so. They seemed to be somewhat (whatever they were, it made no matter to him), but, in conference, they added nothing to him, they gave him no satisfaction, Galatians 2:6. One faithful prophet of the Lord was worth them all.
VI.Ahab has another, but one he hates, Micaiah by name, and, to please Jehoshaphat, he is willing to have him sent for, 1 Kings 22:8-10.
Ahab owned that they might enquire of the Lord by him, that he was a true prophet, and one that knew God's mind. And yet,
1.He hated him, and was not ashamed to own to the king of Judah that he did so, and to give this for a reason. He doth not prophesy good concerning me, but evil. And whose fault was that? If Ahab had done well, he would have heard nothing but good from heaven; if he do ill, he may thank himself for all the uneasiness which the reproofs and threats of God's word gave him. Note, Those are wretchedly hardened in sin, and are ripening apace for ruin, who hate God's ministers because they deal plainly with them and faithfully warn them of their misery and danger by reason of sin, and reckon those their enemies that tell them the truth.
2.He had (it should seem) imprisoned him; for, when he committed him (1 Kings 22:26), he bade the officer carry him back, namely, to the place whence he came. We may suppose that this was he that reproved him for his clemency to Ben-hadad (1 Kings 20:38, etc.) and for so doing was cast into prison, where he had lain these three years. This was the reason why Ahab knew where to find him so readily, 1 Kings 22:9. But his imprisonment had not excluded him for divine visits: the spirit of prophecy continued with him there. He was bound, but the word of the Lord was not. Nor did it in the lease abate his courage, nor make him less confident or faithful in delivering his message. Jehoshaphat gave too gentle a reproof to Ahab for expressing his indignation against a faithful prophet: Let not the king say so, 1 Kings 22:8. He should have said, "Thou art unjust to the prophet, unkind to thyself, and puttest an affront upon his Lord and thine, in saying so." Such sinners as Ahab must be rebuked sharply. However he so far yielded to the reproof that, for fear of provoking Jehoshaphat to break off from his alliance with him, he orders Micaiah to be sent for with all speed, 1 Kings 22:9. The two kings sat each in their robes and chairs of state, in the gate of Samaria, ready to receive this poor prophet, and to hear what he had to say; for many will give God's word the hearing that will not lend it an obedient ear. They were attended with a crowd of flattering prophets, that could not think of prophesying any thing but what was very sweet and very smooth to two such glorious princes now in confederacy. Those that love to be flattered shall not want flatterers.
VII.Micaiah is pressed by the officer that fetches him to follow the cry, 1 Kings 22:13.
That officer was unworthy the name of an Israelite who pretended to prescribe to a prophet; but he thought him altogether such a one as the rest, who studied to please men and not God. He told Micaiah how unanimous the other prophets were in foretelling the king's good success, how agreeable it was to the king, intimating that it was his interest to say as they said - he might thereby gain, not only enlargement, but preferment. Those that dote upon worldly things themselves think every body else should do so too, and true or false, right or wrong, speak and act for their secular interest only. He intimated likewise that it would be to no purpose to contradict such a numerous and unanimous vote; he would be ridiculed, as affecting a foolish singularity, if he should. But Micaiah, who knows better things, protests, and backs his protestation with an oath, that he will deliver his message from God with all faithfulness, whether it be pleasing or displeasing to his prince (1 Kings 22:14): "What the Lord saith to me, that will I speak, without addition, diminution, or alteration." This was nobly resolved, and as became one who had his eye to a greater King than either of these, arrayed with brighter robes, and sitting on a higher throne.
Continue studying 1 Kings 22:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
Summary
Jehoshaphat asks for another prophet because he had asked for the word of the LORD, and after hearing 400 men promise victory he still wanted a prophet of the LORD. The text never says what made him ask, but the story proves him right, because Micaiah, the man named in answer, foretold disaster, and the battle went as Micaiah said.
Who Is Speaking
Jehoshaphat king of Judah is speaking to Ahab king of Israel, who is called only “the king of Israel” here and is named later in the chapter (1 Kings 22:20). The two kings are about to march on Ramothgilead, a city Ahab claims as Israel’s and the king of Syria still holds (1 Kings 22:3). Jehoshaphat has already promised his help with the words “I am as thou art, my people as thy people, my horses as thy horses”, so a wrong answer would cost him as well as Ahab.
What It Means
Jehoshaphat’s question is courteous, and he does not call the 400 liars. He simply asks if there is one more man to hear, and he names the kind of man he wants. Ahab understands him at once, because he replies with the name of the man he hates: “There is yet one man, Micaiah the son of Imlah”.
The text does not tell us why Jehoshaphat was uneasy, but it gives us several things that fit. The 400 were men Ahab himself had gathered, and they all gave the same answer, the one the king wanted (1 Kings 22:13). Ahab had built an altar to Baal (1 Kings 16:30-33), and in his reign Jezebel had killed the LORD’s prophets (1 Kings 18:4). Jehoshaphat himself sought the God of his father and turned from the Baals, and he removed high places and groves from Judah (2 Chronicles 17:3-6). A king like that had good reason to want more than Ahab’s own prophets.
Scripture does not say exactly who the 400 were. They were not openly prophets of Baal, because they spoke in the LORD’s name (1 Kings 22:11-12). The 450 prophets of Baal had been killed after Carmel (1 Kings 18:40). Elijah’s challenge also mentions 400 prophets of the groves (1 Kings 18:19), but the text does not connect them with these men. Many Christians think they served the mixed worship set up at Bethel and Dan (1 Kings 12:28-33), where the LORD’s name was used alongside the golden calves, which fits the story, though the text does not state it.
The chapter does settle whether they spoke truly. Micaiah saw that the LORD had allowed a lying spirit into the mouths of all of them, and he told Ahab so to his face (1 Kings 22:22-23).
Why It Matters
This question is what brings the LORD’s word into the room. Without it, the kings would have gone up with only the answer of the 400. Micaiah is fetched, sees Israel scattered like sheep without a shepherd (1 Kings 22:17), and is struck and jailed for saying so (1 Kings 22:24-27). So the chapter sets 400 agreeing voices against one man, and the one man is right. The truth of a word from God did not depend on how many said it.
The story also shows that asking is only half of the matter. Jehoshaphat asked for the true word and heard it, and he still went up to the battle (1 Kings 22:29).
A Hard Question
Why was a godly king allied with a wicked one? Scripture gives the facts without giving his reasons, and it does not approve of the alliance. Judah and Israel had been at war in earlier years (1 Kings 15:16), and Jehoshaphat made peace with Israel (1 Kings 22:44). He also joined himself to Ahab by marriage (2 Chronicles 18:1), and his son married Ahab’s daughter (2 Kings 8:18).
When he came home from this battle, Jehu the seer rebuked him for helping the ungodly, while also saying that good had been found in him (2 Chronicles 19:1-3). The cost was real. He nearly died at Ramothgilead, and Athaliah, the mother of his grandson Ahaziah, later destroyed the royal family of Judah, leaving only the child who was hidden from her (2 Kings 11:1-2).
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
A man who speaks by God’s inspiration. Ahab’s 400 were called prophets as well, so Jehoshaphat adds “of the LORD” to say which kind he means.
The name of Israel’s God, which the KJV prints in capitals. When the 400 first answer, the KJV prints “the Lord”, which is a title, and Jehoshaphat says “the LORD”. It would be a mistake to build much on that, because they use the name itself a few verses later.
This means still, or further. Jehoshaphat is asking for one more.
To seek or ask, and here to seek an answer from God. It is the same word as his first request in the verse “Enquire, I pray thee, at the word of the LORD to day”, and Ahab uses it in his reply. The word “we” in this verse includes Ahab, so Jehoshaphat wants both kings to hear the answer.
Reflection and Application
Many voices agreeing is no proof that God has spoken, and neither is the fact that they say what we were hoping to hear. Scripture warns of a way that looks right to a man and ends in death (Proverbs 14:12), and of people who gather teachers to suit their own desires (2 Timothy 4:3).
We do not need to send for a prophet as the two kings did. God has now spoken by his Son (Hebrews 1:1-2), who is the prophet Moses promised (Acts 3:22), and we have the Scriptures God breathed (2 Timothy 3:16). So we can bring our plans to him in prayer and in his Word, as David asked the LORD to show him his ways (Psalm 25:4-5). Jehoshaphat’s mistake is a warning here too, because we can ask for the truth, hear it clearly, and still go up to Ramothgilead.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does it mean to enquire of the LORD, and how was it done?
It means asking God for his answer on a real decision. In Micaiah’s day that usually meant going to a prophet, which is why Ahab speaks of a man “by whom we may enquire of the LORD”. Scripture also tells of people going to the seer to enquire of God (1 Samuel 9:9), of David asking through the priest and the ephod (1 Samuel 23:9-12), and of the LORD answering by dreams, Urim or prophets (1 Samuel 28:6).
How can you tell a true prophet from a false one?
Scripture gives clear tests. If what a man says in the LORD’s name does not come to pass, the LORD did not speak it (Deuteronomy 18:20-22), and Micaiah staked his own word on that same test (1 Kings 22:28). Even a sign that comes true proves nothing if the prophet leads people after other gods (Deuteronomy 13:1-3). The LORD also says of false prophets that he did not send them and that they speak peace to those who despise him (Jeremiah 14:14, Jeremiah 23:16-17). A pleasant message is not false for that reason alone, but a message that only ever pleases deserves care. Jesus says to look at the fruit (Matthew 7:15-16), and John tells believers to test the spirits (1 John 4:1).
What happened in the battle at Ramothgilead?
It went as Micaiah said. Ahab disguised himself and let Jehoshaphat ride in his royal robes. The Syrian captains had orders to fight only the king of Israel, so they chased Jehoshaphat until he cried out and they saw he was the wrong man, and Chronicles says the LORD helped him (1 Kings 22:30-33, 2 Chronicles 18:31). Then a man drew his bow without aiming at anyone in particular, and the arrow found the gap in Ahab’s armour. He died that evening, the army was sent home, and dogs licked his blood in Samaria, as the LORD had said through Elijah (1 Kings 22:34-38, 1 Kings 21:19). The battle is usually dated about 853 BC.
Is it wrong to seek a second opinion from God, or does it show a lack of faith?
Jehoshaphat’s question was faithful, because he was checking whether God had spoken at all. He did the same thing in another war (2 Kings 3:11), asking, “Is there not here a prophet of the LORD, that we may enquire of the LORD by him?” The wrong kind of asking is going back after God has clearly answered, hoping for a different reply, as Balaam did (Numbers 22:12, Numbers 22:19).
Why does Ahab say he hates Micaiah?
He gives his own reason: “I hate him; for he doth not prophesy good concerning me, but evil”. Jehoshaphat’s reply is a mild correction: “Let not the king say so”.
Is this verse told anywhere else?
Yes. 2 Chronicles 18:6 gives the same scene, and Jehoshaphat’s question there is word for word the same apart from its opening: “But Jehoshaphat said, Is there not here a prophet of the LORD besides, that we might enquire of him?”
Last revised