Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Abraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Abimelech; and both of them made a covenant.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Abraham H85 took H3947 sheep H6629 and oxen H1241, and gave H5414 them unto Abimelech H40; and both of them H8147 made H3772 a covenant H1285.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Avraham took sheep and cattle and gave them to Avimelekh, and the two of them made a covenant.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So Abraham brought sheep and cattle and gave them to Abimelech, and the two men made a covenant.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Abraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Abimelech; and they two made a covenant.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Abraham took sheep and cattle, and gave them to Abimelech. Those two made a covenant.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Abraham tooke sheepe and beeues, and gaue them vnto Abimelech: and they two made a couenant.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Abraham taketh sheep and oxen, and giveth to Abimelech, and they make, both of them, a covenant;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Genesis 21:22-34, Genesis 22:1-18
Genesis 21:22-34, Genesis 22:1-18 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 541 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 21:27 records a pivotal moment in the life of Abraham, detailing his presentation of sheep and oxen to Abimelech, which formally sealed a covenant between the two men. This act resolved a prior dispute over a well at Beer-sheba, establishing a binding agreement that secured Abraham's rights to the land and water, fostering peace and reconciliation between their respective peoples.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a significant narrative arc in the book of Genesis, specifically following the birth of Isaac and the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael. The immediate preceding verses (Genesis 21:22-26) detail Abimelech's approach to Abraham, acknowledging God's favor upon him, and Abraham's subsequent complaint regarding a well seized by Abimelech's servants. The covenant in Genesis 21:27 serves as the formal resolution to this conflict, leading directly into the naming of Beer-sheba in Genesis 21:31 as the "well of the oath," commemorating this very agreement. It marks a period of peace and stability for Abraham in the land of Gerar before his ultimate test in Genesis 22.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, covenants (Hebrew: berith) were foundational to social, political, and economic life. They were solemn, binding agreements, often ratified through symbolic actions such as the exchange of gifts, shared meals, or the cutting of animals (as seen in Genesis 15:9-10). The giving of sheep and oxen, as described in Genesis 21:27, was a common practice to solemnize such pacts, signifying a material pledge, a transfer of assets, and a demonstration of good faith. The dispute over water rights was also a common and critical issue in arid regions, making the resolution of the well conflict particularly vital for the survival and prosperity of both Abraham's nomadic group and Abimelech's settled kingdom.

  • Key Themes: This passage contributes to several overarching themes in Genesis. It reinforces the theme of God's faithfulness to Abraham's covenant by demonstrating how God's blessing on Abraham allows him to secure his position and rights even among foreign kings, as seen in Abimelech's recognition of God's presence with Abraham in Genesis 21:22. The resolution of the well dispute highlights the theme of peacemaking and reconciliation, emphasizing the importance of formal agreements to prevent conflict and establish stable relationships. Furthermore, Abraham's actions reflect the theme of integrity and witness, as his righteous conduct and God's evident blessing lead a pagan king to seek a binding agreement with him, demonstrating the impact of a life lived in accordance with God's will. The establishment of rights over the well also touches upon the theme of land and inheritance, a recurring motif throughout the patriarchal narratives, as Abraham begins to secure tangible claims in the land promised to his descendants.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • took (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): This primitive root signifies "to take" in a wide variety of applications, including to accept, acquire, or receive. In this context, Abraham actively "took" (H3947) the livestock from his own possessions, highlighting his initiative and the intentionality of his gift as a formal act of covenant-making, rather than a casual exchange.
  • oxen (Hebrew, bâqâr', H1241): Referring to beef cattle or animals of the ox family (H1241), this term denotes substantial wealth and utility in an agrarian society. The inclusion of oxen, alongside sheep, indicates a significant offering, underscoring the gravity and value Abraham placed on the covenant being established. It was a tangible transfer of valuable assets.
  • made (Hebrew, kârath', H3772): This primitive root means "to cut (off, down or asunder)," and by implication, "to destroy" or "to covenant" (H3772). The specific usage here, "to make a covenant," refers to the ancient practice of cutting flesh and passing between the pieces to solemnize an agreement, symbolizing the dire consequences for breaking the pact. This emphasizes the binding and serious nature of the agreement between Abraham and Abimelech.
  • covenant (Hebrew, bᵉrîyth', H1285): Derived from a root meaning "to cut" (H1285), this term refers to a compact or solemn agreement. The etymology itself points to the ancient practice of cutting animals to ratify a covenant, signifying a deeply binding and often sacred oath. In this verse, it denotes a formal, mutual, and legally recognized agreement that establishes a lasting relationship and defines mutual obligations and rights.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Abraham took sheep and oxen": This phrase describes Abraham's deliberate action of selecting and preparing a substantial offering from his own wealth. The mention of both sheep (tsôʼn, H6629) and oxen (bâqâr, H1241) indicates a significant gift, far beyond a mere token. In the ancient Near East, such livestock represented valuable assets, and their presentation served as a tangible demonstration of Abraham's sincerity, generosity, and commitment to the impending agreement. It was a material pledge, signifying the value he placed on resolving the dispute and establishing peace.
  • "and gave them unto Abimelech;": This clause emphasizes the transfer of these valuable assets from Abraham to Abimelech. The verb "gave" (nâthan, H5414) signifies a formal presentation, not merely a casual hand-off. This act of giving was integral to the covenant-making ritual, serving as a material ratification of the agreement. It was a public and observable demonstration of goodwill and a pledge of fidelity, establishing a foundation of trust between the two parties.
  • "and both of them made a covenant.": This concluding clause states the ultimate outcome of the preceding actions: the formal establishment of a berith (H1285), a solemn and binding agreement. The phrase "both of them" (shᵉnayim, H8147) highlights the mutual consent and participation in the covenant. The verb "made" (kârath, H3772) often implies "cutting" a covenant, referring to the ancient practice of cutting animals and passing between the halves, symbolizing the consequences of breaking the oath. This covenant was not a casual promise but a legally and socially binding pact, securing peace and defining rights, particularly concerning the disputed well at Beer-sheba.

Literary Devices

The passage employs several literary devices to convey its meaning and significance. Action-oriented language is prominent, with verbs like "took," "gave," and "made" emphasizing the concrete, deliberate steps taken by Abraham and Abimelech to formalize their agreement. This highlights the practical and tangible nature of ancient Near Eastern covenants. The use of Symbolism is also central, as the "sheep and oxen" are not merely gifts but potent symbols of wealth, peace, and the material ratification of a solemn pact. Their exchange underscores the value and permanence of the agreement. Furthermore, the narrative employs Foreshadowing, as this covenant, which establishes Abraham's rights to a well in the land, subtly anticipates the greater promise of land and inheritance that God has made to Abraham and his descendants, a theme that will be continually developed throughout the patriarchal narratives.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 21:27 profoundly illustrates the biblical emphasis on the power and importance of covenants, not only as human agreements but also as a reflection of God's own covenantal relationship with humanity. This human-to-human covenant, sealed through tangible gifts, underscores the principles of peace, justice, and reconciliation that are deeply embedded in God's character and His dealings with His people. It demonstrates that even in the midst of potential conflict, a path to mutual understanding and lasting peace can be forged through integrity and formal agreement.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The covenant between Abraham and Abimelech in Genesis 21:27 offers timeless lessons for navigating disputes and fostering harmony in our own lives. It reminds us that true reconciliation often requires more than just words; it demands tangible actions, clear agreements, and a willingness to offer valuable resources—whether time, effort, or material goods—to establish trust and secure peace. In our personal relationships, workplaces, and communities, how often do misunderstandings escalate because we shy away from direct, honest communication and the establishment of clear boundaries or agreements? Abraham's proactive approach to resolving the well dispute, culminating in a formal covenant, challenges us to be peacemakers who are willing to invest in lasting solutions, not just temporary ceasefires. This passage calls us to cultivate integrity in our dealings, ensuring that our word is our bond and that our commitments are backed by demonstrable good faith, thereby building bridges of trust and fostering environments of mutual respect.

Questions for Reflection

  • What current conflict or misunderstanding in your life might benefit from a more formal or explicit "covenant" of understanding and commitment?
  • In what ways can you tangibly demonstrate your commitment to peace and reconciliation in a difficult relationship?
  • How does Abraham's integrity in dealing with Abimelech challenge your own approach to resolving disputes with those outside your immediate circle of trust?
  • What "sheep and oxen"—resources, time, or effort—are you willing to offer to secure lasting peace and clarity in your relationships?

FAQ

What is the significance of "sheep and oxen" in this covenant?

Answer: The giving of sheep and oxen was a customary and profoundly significant practice in the ancient Near East for solemnizing a treaty or covenant. It was not merely a casual gift but a tangible demonstration of good faith, commitment, and the material ratification of the agreement. These animals represented considerable wealth and utility, symbolizing the value and permanence of the pact. By offering such a substantial gift, Abraham underscored the gravity of the agreement and pledged his resources to its fulfillment, ensuring its binding nature and fostering trust between the parties. This act was a common way to seal alliances and secure peace in a world where formal legal systems were often based on personal oaths and public displays of commitment, as seen in other ancient Near Eastern treaties.

Why did Abraham and Abimelech need a formal covenant if Abimelech denied knowing about the well dispute?

Answer: While Abimelech denied direct knowledge of his servants' actions regarding the well, the dispute had created significant tension and uncertainty regarding property rights and future interactions. A formal covenant was essential to move beyond mere verbal assurances and establish a legally and socially binding agreement. It provided a clear framework for defining boundaries, securing Abraham's rightful claim to the well, and ensuring future peace and stability between their respective peoples. Without such a formal pact, the underlying mistrust and potential for future conflicts over resources would have remained, jeopardizing the peaceful coexistence that both parties ultimately desired. The covenant served as a public, undeniable commitment to a new, peaceful relationship, preventing similar disputes from arising again.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The covenant established between Abraham and Abimelech, which secured peace and defined rights through a tangible exchange, serves as a profound earthly shadow of the ultimate covenant of peace established through Jesus Christ. While Abraham's covenant resolved a temporal dispute over a well, Christ's New Covenant, inaugurated by His sacrificial death, resolves humanity's deepest conflict with God—the problem of sin and separation. This divine covenant is sealed not with the blood of sheep and oxen, but with the precious blood of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world. Through Christ, God offers eternal peace, complete forgiveness, and the promise of an everlasting inheritance to all who believe, fulfilling the deepest human need for lasting harmony with God and one another. Abraham's pursuit of reconciliation and a binding agreement with Abimelech points to the greater reconciliation accomplished by Christ, who is our peace and the mediator of a superior covenant, one that is eternal and transforms hearts, as prophesied in Jeremiah 31:33.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 21 verses 22–32

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an account of the treaty between Abimelech and Abraham, in which appears the accomplishment of that promise (Gen 12:2) that God would make his name great. His friendship is valued, is courted, though a stranger, though a tenant at will to the Canaanites and Perizzites.

I. The league is proposed by Abimelech, and Phichol his prime-minister of state and general of his army.

1.The inducement to it was God's favour to Abraham (Gen 21:22): "God is with thee in all that thou doest, and we cannot but take notice of it." Note, (1.) God in his providence sometimes shows his people such tokens for good that their neighbours cannot but take notice of it, Psa 86:17. Their affairs do so visibly prosper, and they have such remarkable success in their undertakings, that a confession is extorted from all about them of God's presence with them. (2.) It is good being in favour with those that are in favour with God, and having an interest in those that have an interest in heaven, Zac 8:23. We will go with you, for we have heard that God is with you. We do well for ourselves if we have fellowship with those that have fellowship with God, Jo1 1:3.

2.The tenour of it was, in general, that there should be a firm and constant friendship between the two families, which should not upon any account be violated. This bond of friendship must be strengthened by the bond of an oath, in which the true God was appealed to, both as a witness of their sincerity and an avenger in case either side were treacherous, Gen 21:23. Observe, (1.) He desires the entail of this league upon his posterity and the extension of it to his people. He would have his son, and his son's son, and his land likewise, to have the benefit of it. Good men should secure an alliance and communion with the favourites of Heaven, not for themselves only, but for theirs also. (2.) He reminds Abraham of the fair treatment he had found among them: According to the kindness I have done unto thee. As those that have received kindness must return it, so those that have shown kindness may expect it.

II. It is consented to by Abraham, with a particular clause inserted about a well. In Abraham's part of this transaction observe,

1.He was ready to enter into this league with Abimelech, finding him to be a man of honour and conscience, and that had the fear of God before his eyes: I will swear, Gen 21:24. Note, (1.) Religion does not make men morose and unconversable; I am sure it ought not. We must not, under colour of shunning bad company, be sour to all company, and jealous of every body. (2.) An honest mind does not startle at giving assurances: if Abraham say that he will be true to Abimelech, he is not afraid to swear it; an oath is for confirmation.

2.He prudently settled the matter concerning a well, about which Abimelech's servants had quarrelled with him. Wells of water, it seems, were choice goods in that country: thanks be to God, that they are not so scarce in ours. (1.) Abraham mildly told Abimelech of it, Gen 21:25. Note, If our brother trespass against us, we must, with the meekness of wisdom, tell him his fault, that the matter may be fairly accommodated and an end made of it, Mat 18:15. (2.) He acquiesced in Abimelech's justification of himself in this matter: I wot not who has done this thing, Gen 21:26. Many are suspected of injustice and unkindness that are perfectly innocent, and we ought to be glad when they clear themselves. The faults of servants must not be imputed to their masters, unless they know of them and justify them; and no more can be expected from an honest man than that he be ready to do right as soon as he knows that he has done wrong. (3.) He took care to have his title to the well cleared and confirmed, to prevent any disputes or quarrels for the future, Gen 21:30. It is justice, as well as wisdom, to do thus, in perptuam rei memoriam - that the circumstance may be perpetually remembered.

3.He made a very handsome present to Abimelech, Gen 21:27. It was not any thing curious or fine that he presented to him, but that which was valuable and useful - sheep and oxen, in gratitude for Abimelech's kindness to him, and in token of hearty friendship between them. The interchanging of kind offices is the improving of love: that which is mine is my friend's.

4.He ratified the covenant by an oath, and registered it by giving a new name to the place (Gen 21:31), Beer-sheba, the well of the oath, in remembrance of the covenant they swore to, that they might be ever mindful of it; or the well of seven, in remembrance of the seven lambs given to Abimelech, as a consideration for his confirming Abraham's title to that well. Note, Bargains made must be remembered, that we may make them good, and may not break our word through oversight.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 21:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.