Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar;) and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And there went out H3318 the king H4428 of Sodom H5467, and the king H4428 of Gomorrah H6017, and the king H4428 of Admah H126, and the king H4428 of Zeboiim H6636, and the king H4428 of Bela H1106(the same H1931 is Zoar H6820;) and they joined H6186 battle H4421 with them in the vale H6010 of Siddim H7708;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Then the kings of S'dom, 'Amora, Admah, Tzvoyim and Bela (that is, Tzo'ar) came out and arrayed themselves for battle in the Siddim Valley
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then the king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, the king of Admah, the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (that is, Zoar) marched out and arrayed themselves for battle in the Valley of Siddim
Ask
American Standard Version
And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar); and they set the battle in array against them in the vale of Siddim;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar) went out; and they set the battle in array against them in the valley of Siddim;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then went out the King of Sodom, and the King of Gomorah, and the King of Admah, and the King of Zeboiim, and the King of Bela, which is Zoar: and they ioyned battell with them in the vale of Siddim:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the king of Sodom goeth out, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar; and they set the battle in array with them in the valley of Siddim,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Abraham's Wars
Abraham's Wars View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 345 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

The formation of a crucial defensive alliance among five local kings—those of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela (identified as Zoar)—who united to confront the formidable invading Mesopotamian coalition. This verse sets the immediate geographical and political stage for a pivotal conflict in the ancient Near East, specifically naming the rulers and the strategic battleground, the Vale of Siddim, thereby leading directly to events that profoundly impact Lot, Abraham's nephew, and subsequently trigger Abraham's heroic intervention.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis 14 presents the first detailed account of a major military conflict in the biblical narrative, serving as a crucial interlude within the patriarchal history of Abraham. Prior to Genesis 14:8, the text establishes the geopolitical backdrop: for twelve years, the kings of the "Cities of the Plain" (Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Bela/Zoar) had been vassals to Chedorlaomer, king of Elam, and his allied Mesopotamian rulers. In the thirteenth year, these local kings rebelled, setting the stage for the punitive expedition described in the preceding verses. Verse 8 marks the local kings' proactive decision to confront their overlords, leading directly to the battle whose outcome results in Lot's capture, which in turn precipitates Abram's decisive intervention and his subsequent encounter with the enigmatic Melchizedek.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The ancient Near East was characterized by a mosaic of city-states, each with its own local ruler, often referred to as "king" (Hebrew: melek). These city-states frequently formed alliances or became vassals to larger, more powerful empires, paying tribute for protection or to avoid conquest. Rebellion against an overlord was a common catalyst for punitive military campaigns, as seen here with Chedorlaomer's expedition. The "Cities of the Plain" were strategically located in the fertile Jordan Valley, a region known for its agricultural wealth and access to trade routes. The mention of the Vale of Siddim as the battleground is significant; as Genesis 14:10 later reveals, it was full of "slimepits" (bitumen or tar pits), which would prove to be a treacherous natural hazard for the fleeing armies, highlighting the practical realities of ancient warfare and geography.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several overarching themes within Genesis. It underscores the theme of divine sovereignty operating even amidst human geopolitical conflicts, as this seemingly secular war ultimately serves God's purposes in the life of Abraham and his lineage. It introduces the moral decay of the Cities of the Plain through their association with rebellion and their later infamous destruction, foreshadowing the divine judgment detailed in Genesis 19. Furthermore, the conflict sets the stage for Abraham's faith and courage, providing the context for him to demonstrate his commitment to family and justice, thereby solidifying his role as a pivotal figure in God's redemptive plan. The detailed geographical and political descriptions also highlight the historical verisimilitude of the biblical narrative, grounding its theological truths in a tangible ancient world.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Genesis 14:8 provides a succinct yet impactful account of the unified front presented by the kings of the Jordan Valley. The specific identification of each king and their cities underscores the gravity and scale of the impending conflict, highlighting a crucial moment of resistance.

Key Word Analysis

  • went out (Hebrew, yâtsâʼ', H3318): This verb (H3318) signifies a proactive and deliberate departure, often with a purpose such as war or a mission. Here, it indicates that the kings of the plain were not merely reacting defensively within their cities but actively chose to sally forth and engage the invading forces on open ground, demonstrating a calculated, albeit ultimately unsuccessful, military strategy.
  • king (Hebrew, melek', H4428): The term (H4428) denotes a monarch or ruler. In the context of the ancient Near East, these "kings" were typically rulers of city-states, exercising authority over a limited territory and its inhabitants. The repeated mention of "the king of" emphasizes the collective, organized nature of this local alliance against the foreign invaders.
  • joined (Hebrew, ʻârak', H6186): This root (H6186) means "to set in a row," "arrange," or "put in order." When used in a military context, as it is here in conjunction with "battle," it specifically refers to "setting the battle in array" or "preparing for battle." It conveys the organized deployment of forces, indicating a formal and intentional engagement rather than a chaotic skirmish.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same [is] Zoar;)": This initial clause meticulously lists the five allied kings and their respective city-states. The verb "went out" (Hebrew: yâtsâʼ) implies a deliberate, organized movement from their fortified cities to meet the enemy. The parenthetical note "(the same [is] Zoar;)" clarifies the identity of Bela, a city that will later play a unique role in the narrative of divine judgment, distinguishing it from the other cities of the plain. This enumeration underscores the formation of a united front, highlighting the regional political landscape and the collective response to the Mesopotamian invasion.
  • "and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim;": This second clause describes the decisive action taken by the allied kings: they "joined battle" (Hebrew: ʻârak milchâmâh), meaning they arrayed themselves for combat and engaged the opposing forces. The specific location, the "vale of Siddim," is crucial. This valley, later described as being full of bitumen pits in Genesis 14:10, served as the chosen field of engagement, a strategic yet treacherous terrain that would significantly influence the battle's outcome. This detail grounds the narrative in a specific geographical reality, setting the stage for the ensuing conflict and its consequences.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices to enhance its impact. Repetition of the phrase "the king of" for each city emphasizes the unified, yet distinct, leadership of the five allied city-states, creating a rhythmic and formal tone that highlights the gravity of the alliance. The precise naming of each city and its king, along with the specific geographical location ("the vale of Siddim"), serves as an example of Geographical and Onomastic Specificity, lending a sense of historical verisimilitude and grounding the narrative in a tangible ancient world. Furthermore, the mention of Bela as "the same [is] Zoar" functions as a subtle Foreshadowing, hinting at Zoar's unique destiny and its eventual sparing from the divine destruction that would later befall Sodom and Gomorrah, thereby adding a layer of dramatic irony for the reader familiar with the broader Genesis narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While Genesis 14:8 describes a seemingly secular military event, it is deeply embedded within God's unfolding redemptive plan, demonstrating His providential oversight even in the midst of human conflict and geopolitical maneuvering. The rebellion of these kings, particularly those of Sodom and Gomorrah, against an earthly overlord subtly introduces their character before their more infamous portrayal as centers of grave sin, establishing a pattern of defiance that extends beyond political subjugation to moral and spiritual rebellion against God Himself. This war, leading to Lot's capture, serves as a divine catalyst, forcing Abraham out of his settled life to act decisively, thereby providing a crucial opportunity for him to demonstrate faith, courage, and commitment to his family, and ultimately setting the stage for his encounter with Melchizedek, a pivotal moment in the unfolding covenant narrative.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 14:8, though a brief account of ancient warfare, offers profound insights into the interconnectedness of human actions and divine providence. It reminds us that even in the chaos and ambition of human conflicts, God's sovereign hand is at work, orchestrating events to fulfill His greater purposes. The decision of these kings to "go out" and "join battle" reflects human agency and strategic choice, yet the ultimate outcome and its subsequent impact on Abraham's life reveal a divine narrative unfolding. This passage encourages us to look beyond immediate circumstances and recognize that God can use seemingly mundane or even tragic events to advance His redemptive plan. For believers today, it underscores the truth that our lives, our struggles, and even the broader geopolitical landscape are not outside of God's watchful care, and He is continually working all things for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose, often in ways we cannot immediately discern.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the detailed naming of kings and cities in this verse highlight the historical reality of the biblical narrative, and what significance does this hold for our faith?
  • In what ways does this seemingly secular battle foreshadow later divine judgments or interventions in the biblical narrative?
  • How can we discern God's providential hand at work in the seemingly chaotic or challenging events of our own lives or in the world today?

FAQ

What is the significance of the "Vale of Siddim" in this battle?

Answer: The "Vale of Siddim" was strategically crucial because, as Genesis 14:10 explains, it was "full of slimepits" (bitumen or tar pits). These natural hazards became a significant trap during the battle, as many of the fleeing kings of Sodom and Gomorrah and their armies fell into them, contributing directly to their defeat and capture by the invading Mesopotamian forces.

Why are the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah specifically mentioned?

Answer: The kings of Sodom and Gomorrah are prominently mentioned because their cities, along with Admah and Zeboiim, are the infamous "Cities of the Plain" known for their extreme wickedness. Their involvement in this initial rebellion and subsequent defeat sets the stage for their later, more significant interactions with Abraham and Lot, ultimately leading to their divine destruction as recorded in Genesis 19.

Did Bela (Zoar) suffer the same fate as Sodom and Gomorrah?

Answer: No, Bela, which is explicitly identified as Zoar in Genesis 14:8, was uniquely spared the divine destruction that befell Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot specifically fled to Zoar at the angels' instruction before the judgment, as detailed in Genesis 19:20-23.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 14:8 describes an earthly conflict, the broader narrative of Genesis 14 profoundly points to Christ, primarily through the figure of Melchizedek. Following this battle and Abram's victorious rescue of Lot, Abram encounters Melchizedek, king of Salem and priest of God Most High, who blesses Abram and receives a tithe from him. Melchizedek serves as a remarkable type or prefigurement of Christ, being both king and priest, without recorded genealogy or end of days, thus foreshadowing Christ's eternal and superior priesthood (as extensively elaborated in Hebrews 7). Furthermore, Abram's decisive action to rescue Lot from captivity and oppression, a deliverance achieved through strength and courage, broadly echoes Christ's ultimate work of salvation, freeing humanity from the bondage of sin and death (as seen in passages like Colossians 1:13-14 and Hebrews 2:14-15). Thus, even in this ancient account of war, we glimpse the shadows and patterns of God's redemptive plan culminating in Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 14 verses 1–12

We have here an account of the first war that ever we read of in scripture, which (though the wars of the nations make the greatest figure in history) we should not have had the history of if Abram and Lot had not been concerned in it. Now, concerning this war, we may observe,

I. The parties engaged in it. The invaders were four kings, two of them no less than kings of Shinar and Elam (that is, Chaldea and Persia), yet probably not the sovereign princes of those great kingdoms in their own persons, but either officers under them, or rather the heads and leaders of some colonies which came out of those great nations, and settled themselves near Sodom, but retained the names of the countries from which they had their origin. The invaded were the kings of five cities that lay near together in the plain of Jordan, namely, Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Zoar. Four of them are named, but not the fifth, the king of Zoar or Bela, either because he was much more mean and inconsiderable or because he was much more wicked and inglorious than the rest, and worthy to be forgotten.

II. The occasion of this war was the revolt of the five kings from under the government of Chedorlaomer. Twelve years they served him. Small joy they had of their fruitful land, while thus they were tributaries to a foreign power, and could not call what they had their own. Rich countries are a desirable prey, and idle luxurious countries are an easy prey, to growing greatness. The Sodomites were the posterity of Canaan whom Noah had pronounced a servant to Shem, from whom Elam descended; thus soon did that prophecy begin to e fulfilled. In the thirteenth year, beginning to be weary of their subjection, they rebelled, denied their tribute, and attempted to shake off the yoke and retrieve their ancient liberties. In the fourteenth year, after some pause and preparation, Chedorlaomer, in conjunction with his allies, set himself to chastise and reduce the rebels, and, since he could not have it otherwise, to fetch his tribute from them on the point of his sword. Note, Pride, covetousness, and ambition, are the lusts from which wars and fightings come. To these insatiable idols the blood of thousands has been sacrificed.

III. The progress and success of the war. The four kings laid the neighbouring countries waste and enriched themselves with the spoil of them (Gen 14:5-7), upon the alarm of which it had been the wisdom of the king of Sodom to submit, and desire conditions of peace; for how could he grapple with an enemy thus flushed with victory? But he would rather venture the utmost extremity than yield, and it sped accordingly. Quos Deus destruet eos dementat - Those whom God means to destroy he delivers up to infatuation. 1. The forces of the king of Sodom and his allies were routed; and, it should seem, many of them perished in the slime-pits who had escaped the sword, Gen 14:10. In all places we are surrounded with deaths of various kinds, especially in the field of battle. 2. The cities were plundered, Gen 14:11. All the goods of Sodom, and particularly their stores and provisions of victuals, were carried off by the conquerors. Note, When men abuse the gifts of a bountiful providence to gluttony and excess, it is just with God, and his usual way, by some judgment or other to strip them of that which they have so abused, Hos 2:8, Hos 2:9. 3. Lot was carried captive, Gen 14:12. They took Lot among the rest, and his goods. Now Lot may here be considered, (1.) As sharing with his neighbours in this common calamity. Though he was himself a righteous man, and (which is here expressly noticed) Abram's brother's son, yet he was involved with the rest in all this trouble. Note, All things come alike to all, Ecc 9:2. The best of men cannot promise themselves an exemption from the greatest troubles in this life; neither from our own piety nor our relation to those that are the favourites of heaven will be our security, when God's judgments are abroad. Note, further, Many an honest man fares the worse for his wicked neighbours. It is therefore our wisdom to separate ourselves, or at least to distinguish ourselves, from them (Co2 6:17), and so deliver ourselves, Rev 18:4. (2.) As smarting for the foolish choice he made of a settlement here. This is plainly intimated when it is said, They took Abram's brother's son, who dwelt in Sodom. So near a relation of Abram should have been a companion and disciple of Abram, and should have abode by his tents; but, if he choose to dwell in Sodom, he must thank himself if he share in Sodom's calamities. Note, When we go out of the way of our duty we put ourselves from under God's protection, and cannot expect that the choices which are made by our lusts should issue to our comfort. Particular mention is made of their taking Lot's goods, those goods which had occasioned his contest with Abram and his separation from him. Note, It is just with God to deprive us of those enjoyments by which we have suffered ourselves to be deprived of our enjoyment of him.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–12. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On Abraham
We have seen now the prog-ress of the noble mind, which, finding itself in perilous deviation from the path of virtue, immediately arose to search for the reward of wisdom, the inheritance of justice. The readings that follow will show how harmful are the vices connected with frivolity. For those four kings who defeated the five kings and took captive the whole cavalry of the Sodomites captured Lot the son of Abraham’s brother as well and went on their way. The five kings are our five bodily senses: sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing. The four kings are the seductions of the body and of the world, because human flesh and the world are composed of four elements. Rightly are they called kings, because sin has a sovereignty of its own, has its own great kingdom. For this reason, the apostle says, “Let not sin reign in your mortal body.” Our senses, then, easily yield to the pleasures of the body and of the world and become as it were subject to their dominion. Indeed, the pleasures of the body and the seductions of the world are conquered only by a mind that is spiritual, that clings to God and separates itself totally from earthly things—for every perversion is subjection to these allurements. Hence John says, “Woe to the inhabitants of the world!” He was certainly not referring to every human being living on earth at that time—for there are those who live on earth but whose citizenship is in heaven—but rather to those who had been overcome by attachment to this earthly citizenship and the seduction of the world. We are not then inhabitants of this world but pilgrims. Pilgrims live in hope of finding a temporary lodging, but inhabitants seem to place every hope and every use of their goods where they believe they are living by right. Thus one who is a pilgrim on earth is an inhabitant of heaven, but the inhabitant of earth is an owner of death.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON GENESIS 35.9
Let us not idly pass these words by, dearly beloved, or consider the account to be of no value. It was of set purpose that sacred Scripture recounted everything to us with precision so that we should learn the might of these barbarians and the degree of valor they displayed and with how much ferocity they involved themselves in war so as to clash even with the giants—that is, men powerful in bodily stature—and put to flight all the peoples dwelling there. You see, just as a swollen torrent sweeps away everything in its path and destroys it, in the same way the barbarians fell on these peoples and destroyed them completely with the result that they put to flight the rulers of the Amalekites and all the others. But perhaps someone may say, “What good is it for me to know about the might of the barbarians?” It was not idly or to no purpose that Scripture mixed these matters in with its account. Nor is it without point that we are now bringing it to your attention and directing you in turn to recall their valor. Rather, our purpose is that from the ensuing instruction you may learn the extraordinary degree of God’s power and also the patriarch’s virtue.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron)
And they drew up in battle array against them in the wooded valley. Instead of the wooded valley, in Hebrew it has in the Valley of Siddim, which signifies pleasant and wooded places. For such indeed was the Pentapolis which, because of the wickedness of its inhabitants, deserved not only to be consumed by fires, but also to be hidden in the abyss of waters from the sight of all living beings forever.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 14:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.