TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 22:7–15. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
These laws are,
I.Concerning trusts, Exo 22:7-13.
If a man deliver goods, suppose to a carrier to be conveyed, or to a warehouse-keeper to be preserved, or cattle to a farmer to be fed, upon a valuable consideration, and if a special confidence be reposed in the person they are lodged with, in case these goods be stolen or lost, perish or be damaged, if it appear that it was not by any fault of the trustee, the owner must stand to the loss, otherwise he that has been false to this trust must be compelled to make satisfaction. The trustee must aver his innocence upon oath before the judges, if the case was such as afforded no other proof, and they were to determine the matter according as it appeared. This teaches us,
1.That we ought to be very careful of every thing we are entrusted with, as careful of it, though it be another's, as if it were our own. It is unjust and base, and that which all the world cries shame on, to betray a trust.
2.That there is such a general failing of truth and justice upon earth as gives too much occasion to suspect men's honesty whenever it is their interest to be dishonest.
3.That an oath for confirmation is an end of strife, Heb 6:16. It is called an oath for the Lord (Exo 22:11), because to him the appeal is made, not only as to a witness of truth, but as to an avenger of wrong and falsehood. Those that had offered injury to their neighbour by doing any unjust thing, yet, it might be hoped, had not so far debauched their consciences as to profane an oath of the Lord, and call the God of truth to be witness to a lie: perjury is a sin which natural conscience startles at as much as any other. The religion of an oath is very ancient, and a plain indication of the universal belief of a God, and a providence, and a judgment to come.
4.That magistracy is an ordinance of God, designed, among other intentions, to assist men both in discovering rights disputed and recovering rights denied; and great respect ought to be paid to the determination of the judges.
5.That there is no reason why a man should suffer for that which he could not help: masters should consider this, in dealing with their servants, and not rebuke that as a fault which was a mischance, and which they themselves, had they been in their servants' places, could not have prevented.
II.Concerning loans, Exo 22:14, Exo 22:15.
If a man (suppose) lent his team to his neighbour, if the owner was with it, or was to receive profit for the loan of it, whatever harm befel the cattle the owner must stand to the loss of: but if the owner was so kind to the borrower as to lend it to him gratis, and put such a confidence in him as to trust it from under his own eye, then, if any harm happened, the borrower must make it good. Let us learn hence to be very careful not to abuse any thing that is lent us; it is not only unjust, but base and disingenuous, inasmuch as it is rendering evil for good; we should much rather choose to lose ourselves than that any should sustain loss by their kindness to us. Alas, master! for it was borrowed, Kg2 6:5.
Continue studying Exodus 22:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 22:10 delineates a specific civil statute within the Mosaic Covenant, addressing the responsibilities of a bailee—a person entrusted with another's livestock. This law meticulously outlines scenarios where an entrusted animal, such as an ass, ox, sheep, or any other beast, suffers harm, death, or disappears while under the neighbor's care, particularly when no human witnesses are present. This legal provision is foundational for understanding accountability, fostering trust within the Israelite community, and highlighting the indispensable role of a divine oath in resolving disputes lacking direct evidence.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 22:10 is embedded within the "Book of the Covenant," a comprehensive legal corpus presented in Exodus 20:22-23:33. This section immediately follows the Ten Commandments, serving as their practical application in daily life, governing civil, social, and religious conduct. Specifically, this verse is part of a series of laws concerning property rights and the responsibilities associated with bailment—the temporary transfer of possession of goods. It appears after regulations on theft and damage to fields (Exodus 22:1-9) and directly precedes Exodus 22:11, which prescribes the crucial role of an oath before the Lord as the means of adjudication when no human witnesses can attest to the circumstances of loss or harm. This sequential arrangement underscores the legal framework's reliance on divine attestation in cases of ambiguity.
Historical & Cultural Context
Ancient Israel was fundamentally an agrarian society, where livestock constituted significant wealth, serving as primary assets for labor, transportation, food, and trade. The practice of entrusting animals to neighbors for temporary care was a common and necessary aspect of communal life, reflecting a deep-seated interdependence and mutual trust. However, such arrangements inherently carried risks of loss or damage. The legal systems of the ancient Near East, including Israel's, heavily relied on direct eyewitness testimony to establish facts and determine guilt or innocence. In situations where no human witness was present, as explicitly stipulated by this verse, the legal framework faced a significant challenge in ensuring justice. This necessitated the institution of the divine oath, a solemn declaration made before God, invoking divine judgment as the ultimate arbiter of truth. This practice was not unique to Israel but was a widely accepted legal and religious mechanism in the broader ancient Near Eastern world, emphasizing the sacredness of truth and the pervasive belief in divine oversight.
Key Themes
This verse, though a specific civil law, contributes to several overarching themes within Exodus and the broader Pentateuch. It highlights the theme of Justice and Righteousness, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for fair dealings and the protection of property within the covenant community, even in ambiguous circumstances. It reinforces the principle of Accountability and Stewardship, emphasizing that individuals are responsible for what is entrusted to their care, whether it be property, resources, or relationships. The phrase "no man seeing [it]" profoundly underscores the theme of Divine Omniscience and Sovereignty, reminding the Israelites that even when human eyes are absent, God is the ultimate witness and judge, seeing all actions and intentions. This awareness promotes Integrity and Trust within the community, fostering a society where honesty is upheld not merely out of fear of human reprisal, but out of reverence for God, who ultimately judges all hidden matters, as further elaborated in Exodus 22:11. These themes collectively underscore the holistic nature of the Mosaic Law, which sought to govern every aspect of Israelite life in accordance with God's character.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word (H5414) is a primitive root meaning "to give," "to place," or "to set." In the context of Exodus 22:10, it signifies the deliberate act of entrusting or handing over property, specifically an animal, to another for temporary safekeeping. This voluntary transfer establishes a formal relationship of bailment, imposing a duty of care and responsibility on the recipient (the bailee). It implies a trust extended by the owner to the neighbor.
The Hebrew verb (H8104) denotes "to guard," "to watch over," "to preserve," or "to attend to." This term emphasizes an active, diligent, and protective responsibility. The bailee is not merely holding the animal passively but is expected to exercise reasonable vigilance and care to prevent harm or loss. This word underscores the ethical and legal obligation of stewardship inherent in the agreement, ensuring the well-being of the entrusted property.
This primitive root (H7200) means "to see," "to behold," or "to discern," literally or figuratively. In the phrase "no man seeing [it]," this word is critical. It highlights the absence of direct human observation or eyewitness testimony regarding the incident (the animal's death, injury, or disappearance). This lack of human evidence is the precise condition that necessitates the subsequent legal procedure involving a divine oath, as human courts cannot ascertain fault without a witness, thus appealing to God's all-seeing knowledge.
Verse Breakdown
"If a man deliver unto his neighbour an ass, or an ox, or a sheep, or any beast, to keep;"
This initial clause establishes the legal premise: a gratuitous bailment. It describes a scenario where an owner (the "man") voluntarily entrusts valuable livestock—specifically enumerated as "an ass, or an ox, or a sheep" to emphasize their economic significance, followed by the broader category "or any beast"—to a "neighbor" for temporary care ("to keep"). This act creates a relationship of trust and a corresponding duty of diligent care on the part of the neighbor (the bailee), even without explicit compensation for the service.
"and it die, or be hurt, or driven away,"
This part of the verse specifies the various negative outcomes that might befall the entrusted animal while in the bailee's care. "Die" refers to the animal's demise, "be hurt" indicates injury or harm, and "driven away" implies the animal has gone missing, either strayed, lost, or stolen. These outcomes represent a significant loss to the owner and immediately raise questions about the bailee's diligence, negligence, or whether the event was an unavoidable accident or the act of a third party.
"no man seeing [it]:"
This crucial concluding phrase defines the specific legal context and the unique challenge this law addresses. It stipulates that the incident occurred without any human eyewitnesses. In a legal system heavily reliant on testimony, the absence of direct observation makes it impossible for human courts to determine the cause of the loss or harm, or the bailee's culpability. This condition is the trigger for the subsequent legal procedure detailed in Exodus 22:11, which necessitates an appeal to divine omniscience through an oath before the Lord.
Literary Devices
Exodus 22:10 is a prime example of Casuistic Law, a prevalent legal form in the ancient Near East and throughout the "Book of the Covenant." It follows a conditional, "if... then..." structure, outlining a specific case ("If a man deliver... and it die...") and implying a legal consequence (though the full consequence is detailed in the subsequent verse, Exodus 22:11). This precise, case-by-case approach ensures clarity and addresses common societal situations. The law also employs Specificity by listing particular types of valuable livestock ("ass, or an ox, or a sheep") before generalizing to "any beast." This serves to illustrate the economic value at stake and provides concrete examples for the broader principle. There is an implicit Contrast between situations where human witnesses are present (allowing for direct human testimony and judgment) and the unique scenario presented here, where the explicit absence of witnesses ("no man seeing [it]") necessitates a different, divinely attested, legal procedure. This highlights the comprehensive and adaptable nature of God's law, providing guidance even in ambiguous and unobservable circumstances.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 22:10, though a civil statute concerning property, is profoundly rooted in the theological framework of the Mosaic Covenant. It underscores God's unwavering concern for justice, truth, and the integrity of human relationships within the covenant community. The law implicitly teaches the principle of stewardship, reminding individuals that they are ultimately accountable to God for everything entrusted to their care—whether it be property, resources, or even the trust placed in them by others. The critical phrase "no man seeing [it]" powerfully highlights God's omniscience and omnipotence as the ultimate, ever-present witness and judge. This elevates the concept of truthfulness, demanding absolute integrity even when no human eye is present, because God always sees. The requirement of an oath before the Lord (as detailed in Exodus 22:11) transforms a seemingly mundane civil dispute into a matter of divine accountability, reinforcing the foundational idea that all dealings among people are ultimately conducted before God. This fosters a society built on trust, honesty, and a profound awareness of divine oversight, reflecting the holy character of God Himself.
Reflection and Application
The ancient legal provision in Exodus 22:10, while specifically addressing livestock in an agrarian society, offers timeless and profound principles for contemporary life. It serves as a powerful challenge to our personal responsibility and integrity, particularly in situations where our actions are not subject to human scrutiny. In modern life, we are constantly entrusted with various forms of "property" or responsibilities: financial resources, borrowed items, professional duties, confidential information, or the invaluable trust placed in us by friends, family, and colleagues. This verse calls us to a high standard of stewardship, reminding us that true accountability extends far beyond what is observable by others. It compels us to act with diligence, honesty, and ethical uprightness, even when "no man seeing [it]," because our ultimate accountability is to God, who sees all things—our intentions, our efforts, and our failures. This principle cultivates a deep sense of moral integrity, encouraging us to be trustworthy in all our dealings and to honor the trust others place in us, recognizing that our actions not only impact our personal reputation but also reflect on the broader community of faith and our relationship with God.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is "bailment" in the context of this verse?
In the context of Exodus 22:10, "bailment" refers to the legal arrangement where an owner (the bailor) temporarily entrusts their property, in this specific case, livestock (such as an ass, ox, or sheep), to another person (the bailee) for safekeeping or care. This verse describes a gratuitous bailment, meaning the bailee is not compensated for their service. The law then outlines the bailee's responsibilities for the well-being of the animal and the legal procedures to follow if the animal is harmed, dies, or goes missing while in their care, particularly under the specific condition where there are no witnesses to the event, as further detailed in Exodus 22:11.
Why is "no man seeing [it]" so significant?
The phrase "no man seeing [it]" is profoundly significant because it defines the unique legal and theological challenge that this law addresses. In ancient legal systems, human witnesses were paramount for establishing facts and determining guilt or innocence. When no human eye observed the incident (the animal's death, injury, or disappearance), it became impossible for human courts to ascertain whether the bailee was negligent, if it was an unavoidable accident, or if a third party was responsible for the loss. This explicit lack of human evidence shifts the burden of proof from human testimony to a divine oath, as mandated in Exodus 22:11. It highlights God's role as the ultimate, all-seeing witness and righteous judge, ensuring that justice can still be sought and truth revealed even when human evidence is absent, thereby reinforcing the importance of integrity before God.
Does this law apply to modern situations beyond livestock?
While the specific context of Exodus 22:10 is ancient agrarian society and livestock, the underlying principles are profoundly applicable to a wide array of modern situations. The core themes of stewardship, personal responsibility, integrity, and accountability for entrusted property or duties are universal and timeless. Whether it involves borrowing a friend's car, managing company funds, caring for a neighbor's pet, fulfilling a professional contract, or keeping a promise, the principle remains: we are called to be diligent, honest, and responsible in managing what is placed in our care, especially when our actions are not directly observed by others. The law reminds us that our ultimate accountability is to God, who sees all, fostering a deep and pervasive sense of moral integrity in all aspects of life, extending beyond the letter of the law to the spirit of trustworthiness.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Exodus 22:10, with its profound emphasis on accountability, integrity, and the divine witness in the absence of human testimony, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Christ. The law exposes humanity's inherent need for perfect truthfulness and justice, qualities that fallen humanity consistently fails to uphold, particularly "when no man seeing [it]." Jesus, however, perfectly embodied these principles throughout His earthly life. He lived a life of absolute integrity, always doing the will of His Father, even in the most hidden moments, for He knew that His Father was always with Him and never left Him alone. He is the ultimate "keeper" and Shepherd of His own, declaring that He gives His sheep eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall any man pluck them out of His hand. Furthermore, Christ is the ultimate judge and witness, before whom all hidden things will eventually be brought to light, for nothing is hidden from His sight. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, bearing the righteous judgment for our failures in stewardship and integrity. Through His atoning sacrifice, He provides the means for us to be reconciled to God, enabling us, by the power of the Holy Spirit, to live lives of integrity that honor God, who sees what is done in secret. The law's call for an oath before the Lord in unseen circumstances points forward to the glorious reality that all our lives are lived before the eyes of Him to whom we must give account, and Christ is the one who will ultimately render that perfect and just judgment.