TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Samuel 8:1–3.
Two sad things we find here, but not strange things: - 1. A good and useful man growing old and unfit for service (Sa1 8:1): Samuel was old, and could not judge Israel, as he had done. He is not reckoned to be past sixty years of age now, perhaps not so much; but he was a man betimes, was full of thoughts and cared when he was a child, which perhaps hastened the infirmities of age upon him. The fruits that are the first ripe keep the worst. He had spent his strength and spirits in the fatigue of public business, and now, if he think to shake himself as at other times, he finds he is mistaken: old age has cut his hair. Those that are in the prime of their time ought to be busy in doing the work of life: for, as they go into years, they will find themselves less disposed to it and less able for it. 2. The children of a good man turning aside, and not treading in his steps. Samuel had given his sons so good an education, and they had given him such good hopes of their doing well, and gained such a reputation in Israel, that he made them judges, assistants to him awhile, and afterwards deputies under him at Beersheeba, which lay remote from Ramah, Sa1 8:2. Probably the southern countries petitioned for their residence there, that they might not be necessitated to travel far with their causes. We have reason to think that Samuel gave them their commissions, not because they were his sons (he had no ambition to entail the government upon his family, any more than Gideon had), but because, for aught that yet appeared, they were men very fit for the trust; and none so proper to ease the aged judge, and take some of the burden off him, as (coeteris paribus - other things being equal) his own sons, who no doubt were respected for their good father's sake, and, having such an advantage at setting out, might soon have been great if they had but been good. But, alas! his sons walked not in his ways (Sa1 8:3), and, when their character was the reverse of his, their relation to so good a man, which otherwise would have been their honour, was really their disgrace. Degeneranti genus opprobrium - A good extraction is a reproach to him that degenerates from it. Note, Those that have the most grace themselves cannot give grace to their children. It has often been the grief of good men to see their posterity, instead of treading in their steps, trampling upon them, and, as Job speaks, marring their path. Nay, many that have begun well, promised fair, and set out in the right path, so that their parents and friends have had great hopes of them, yet afterwards have turned aside to by-paths, and been the grief of those of whom they should have been the joy. When Samuel's sons were made judges, and settled at a distance form him, then they discovered themselves. Thus, (1.) Many that have been well educated, and have conducted themselves well while they were under their parents' eye, when they have gone abroad into the world and set up for themselves have proved bad. Let none therefore be secure either of themselves or theirs, but depend on divine grace. (2.) Many that have done well in a state of meanness and subjection have been spoiled by preferment and power. Honours change men's minds, and too often for the worse. It does not appear that Samuel's sons were so profane and vicious as Eli's sons; but, whatever they were in other respects, they were corrupt judges, they turned aside after lucre, after the mammon of unrighteousness, so the Chaldee reads it. Note, The love of money is the root of all evil. It is pernicious in any, but especially in judges. Samuel had taken no bribes (Job 12:3), but his sons had, though, no doubt, he warned them against it when he made them judges; and then they perverted judgment. In determining controversies, they had an eye to the bribe, not to the law, and enquired who bid highest, not who had right on his side. It is sad with a people when the public justice that should do them right, being perverted, does them the greatest wrong.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
But possibly you flatter yourself that since the bishop who has made you a deacon is a holy man, his merits will atone for your transgressions. I have already told you that the father is not punished for the son or the son for the father. “The soul that sins shall itself die.” Samuel too had sons who forsook the fear of the Lord and “turned aside after lucre” and iniquity.
Continue studying 1 Samuel 8:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
First Samuel 8:3 marks a pivotal moment in Israel's history, detailing the profound moral failure of Samuel's sons, Joel and Abiah, whom he had appointed as judges. In stark contrast to their father's integrity, they flagrantly deviated from righteous leadership, driven by avarice and a blatant disregard for justice. Their actions—specifically, turning aside after dishonest gain, accepting bribes, and corrupting the legal process—directly precipitated the elders' demand for a king, thereby instigating the monumental shift from the era of judges to the monarchy in Israel. This verse powerfully underscores the enduring challenge of integrity in leadership and the far-reaching consequences that inevitably arise from its absence.
Context
Literary Context
This verse immediately follows the depiction of Samuel's exemplary and faithful judgeship over Israel, highlighted in 1 Samuel 7:15. As Samuel ages, he attempts to delegate his judicial authority by appointing his sons, Joel and Abiah, as judges in Beer-sheba. However, 1 Samuel 8:3 presents a stark and devastating contrast to their father's integrity, revealing their profound corruption. Their unrighteous conduct serves as the direct catalyst for the elders of Israel to approach Samuel in 1 Samuel 8:4-5 with their momentous demand for a king, "like all the nations," explicitly stating that Samuel's sons "walked not in his ways." This critical failure of inherited leadership is therefore the immediate narrative trigger for the foundational shift in Israel's governmental structure, moving from a theocracy led by divinely appointed judges to a human monarchy.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Israel, judges functioned as multifaceted leaders, encompassing spiritual, military, and judicial responsibilities. They were divinely appointed to deliver the people from oppression and administer justice according to God's law, serving as a vital link between the Lord and His covenant people. The concept of "judgment" (Hebrew: mishpat) was foundational to Israelite society, encompassing not only legal rulings but also the broader administration of righteousness and equity. The Mosaic Law unequivocally prohibited the taking of bribes (Hebrew: shochad), as such actions inherently perverted justice and oppressed the vulnerable, as explicitly stated in Exodus 23:8 and reiterated in Deuteronomy 16:19. The corruption of judges was thus considered a grave offense, undermining the very bedrock of a society built upon divine law and covenant faithfulness. This period was characterized by significant internal instability and external pressures from surrounding nations, making the presence of righteous and incorruptible leadership even more crucial for Israel's survival and spiritual well-being.
Key Themes
The primary themes powerfully illustrated in 1 Samuel 8:3 include the failure of human leadership and the corrupting influence of greed. Samuel's sons exemplify a recurring and tragic pattern throughout Israel's history where those entrusted with authority deviate from God's righteous ways, leading to societal decay and a crisis of faith. Their relentless pursuit of "lucre" (dishonest gain) starkly highlights the destructive and insidious power of avarice, which inevitably compromises integrity and perverts justice. This verse also serves as the direct impetus for the emergent theme of the people's desire for a king, a demand driven by the immediate and palpable failure of Samuel's sons, but also reflecting a deeper, underlying rejection of God's direct rule, as God Himself laments in 1 Samuel 8:7. Fundamentally, it underscores the paramount importance of righteous judgment and the devastating consequences that ensue when it is abandoned, echoing the consistent warnings found in the Mosaic Law about upholding impartial justice for all, regardless of social status, as powerfully articulated in Leviticus 19:15.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term refers to a son, in the widest sense. While typically denoting biological offspring, its inclusion here emphasizes the direct lineage and the expectation of inherited virtue or responsibility. The fact that Samuel's own sons, from a lineage of judges and prophets, failed so spectacularly underscores the personal and generational nature of their moral deviation, highlighting that spiritual inheritance does not guarantee personal righteousness.
This word specifically denotes plunder or gain, almost invariably implying unjust or dishonest profit. It points to wealth acquired through illicit means, often through exploitation, corruption, or extortion. In this context, it powerfully reveals the avaricious motivation of Samuel's sons, indicating that their primary aim was personal enrichment rather than faithful service or the impartial administration of justice. The pursuit of betsaʻ stands in direct and irreconcilable opposition to the righteous conduct expected of God's appointed leaders.
This primitive root means "to stretch or spread out," but also, by strong implication, "to bend away" or "to incline." When combined with "judgment" (mishpat), it powerfully conveys the idea of twisting, distorting, or bending justice away from its straight, righteous, and intended course. It implies a deliberate act of corruption, where legal decisions are no longer based on truth, divine law, or equity, but rather on personal gain, bias, or external influence, thereby fundamentally undermining the very foundation of equitable governance and societal order.
Verse Breakdown
"And his sons walked not in his ways"
This opening clause immediately establishes a profound and tragic contrast between Samuel's exemplary integrity and the conduct of Joel and Abiah. "His ways" refers to Samuel's righteous, impartial, and faithful adherence to God's commands in his role as judge, characterized by devotion, justice, and selflessness. The phrase "walked not" (Hebrew: hâlak loʼ) indicates a deliberate, persistent, and fundamental deviation from this established path, signifying a deep moral and spiritual departure from the high standards set by their father and, implicitly, by God Himself.
"but turned aside after lucre"
This clause precisely identifies the corrupting motivation behind their unrighteous conduct. "Turned aside" (Hebrew: nâṭâh) here denotes a significant deviation or deflection from the proper and expected course of a judge. The object of their deviation is "lucre," emphasizing that their actions were driven by an insatiable desire for dishonest gain. This pursuit of illicit wealth became their guiding principle, fundamentally supplanting their sacred duty to God and their solemn responsibility to the people of Israel.
"and took bribes"
This action is presented as a direct, tangible manifestation of their turning aside after lucre. Taking bribes (Hebrew: lâqach shachad) was a practice explicitly and severely prohibited under Mosaic Law, as it inherently corrupted the judicial process and led to injustice. It implies that their decisions were no longer based on the merits of the case, the principles of justice, or divine law, but rather on financial inducements, making them susceptible to manipulation by the wealthy, the influential, or the guilty.
"and perverted judgment"
This final clause describes the devastating and systemic consequence of their greed and bribe-taking. "Perverted judgment" means they twisted, distorted, or bent the legal and moral principles of justice away from their righteous standard. Instead of administering fair and impartial rulings in accordance with God's law, they rendered verdicts that were biased, unjust, and contrary to truth, causing harm to the innocent, allowing the guilty to go unpunished, and thereby undermining the very fabric of society and the divine order.
Literary Devices
The verse primarily employs Contrast and Irony to highlight the moral failure. The contrast is starkly drawn between the righteous "ways" of Samuel, who faithfully judged Israel according to God's law, and the corrupt, self-serving path taken by his sons. This immediate juxtaposition powerfully underscores the moral decay and the tragic failure of inherited leadership. There is also a profound sense of irony in that Samuel, a prophet and judge dedicated to upholding God's law and administering justice, has sons who fundamentally undermine that very law through their avarice and perversion of judgment. Their actions serve as a tragic foreshadowing of the future struggles Israel will face under flawed human kings, despite the people's initial hope that a monarchy would solve their problems. The language used is direct, concise, and condemnatory, emphasizing the severity and gravity of their transgressions.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The moral failure of Samuel's sons in 1 Samuel 8:3 resonates deeply with broader biblical themes concerning the pervasive nature of sin, the indispensable importance of righteous leadership, and the inevitable consequences of human rebellion against divine standards. Their actions—greed, bribe-taking, and the perversion of justice—are not merely personal failings but represent a systemic corruption that undermines God's covenant with Israel and the foundational principles of His law. This verse powerfully illustrates that even within a divinely ordained system, human sin and moral compromise can lead to profound societal and spiritual decay, necessitating a change that, while seemingly a solution (the demand for a king), also introduces its own set of challenges and complexities. It highlights God's unwavering demand for justice and integrity from all those who represent Him, and the severe repercussions that inevitably follow when such divine standards are abandoned.
Reflection and Application
The tragic account of Samuel's sons serves as a timeless and sobering reminder of the insidious, corrupting power of greed and the critical, non-negotiable importance of integrity in all forms of leadership. Whether in public office, religious institutions, business enterprises, or even within the sphere of our families, the temptation to prioritize personal gain over principle, justice, and the well-being of others remains a constant and potent threat. This verse challenges each of us to deeply examine our own motivations and actions, honestly asking whether we are faithfully "walking in God's ways" or subtly "turning aside after lucre." It powerfully underscores that authentic leadership is characterized by selfless service, unwavering impartiality, and an unyielding commitment to truth and righteousness, even when such commitment demands personal sacrifice or comes at a significant cost. The perversion of judgment, whether manifested in a courtroom, a boardroom, or in our daily interactions and decision-making, inevitably erodes trust, undermines the fabric of community, and inflicts harm. We are therefore called to be vigilant agents of justice, actively advocating for fairness, upholding truth, and defending the rights of the vulnerable and marginalized, steadfastly resisting any temptation to compromise our principles for personal advantage or fleeting gain.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why were Samuel's sons so corrupt, especially given their father's righteousness?
The biblical text does not explicitly provide a detailed explanation for their corruption, but it strongly implies a profound moral and spiritual failure on their part, primarily driven by greed ("turned aside after lucre"). While Samuel was undeniably a righteous and faithful judge, personal righteousness is not automatically inherited or guaranteed through lineage. Each individual is ultimately responsible for their own walk with God and their adherence to His ways. The Bible frequently illustrates that even the children of godly parents can tragically stray, as seen with Eli's wicked sons in 1 Samuel 2:12-17, highlighting the profound reality of individual moral choice and accountability before God. Their positions of power and authority likely amplified their susceptibility to temptation, leading them to abuse their sacred trust and authority for personal gain.
What was the significance of "perverting judgment" in ancient Israel?
"Perverting judgment" (Hebrew: nâṭâh mishpâṭ) was an extremely grave offense in ancient Israel, constituting a direct and severe violation of God's commands for justice, impartiality, and righteousness. God's law explicitly forbade judges from taking bribes or showing any form of partiality, as powerfully articulated in Deuteronomy 16:19. Justice was considered a fundamental reflection of God's own character and His divine order for society. Its perversion therefore undermined the very covenant relationship between God and His people, leading to widespread social instability, the oppression of the poor and vulnerable, and a catastrophic breakdown of trust in the legal and governing systems. It was an act of profound injustice against both God and humanity, severely impacting the most vulnerable members of society and bringing divine displeasure.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The glaring failure of Samuel's sons, leading directly to Israel's desperate demand for a human king, profoundly highlights humanity's inherent and desperate need for a perfect, incorruptible, and eternally righteous leader—a need ultimately and gloriously fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The long line of flawed judges and kings of Israel, including Samuel's sons who notoriously "perverted judgment," collectively underscores the inherent inadequacy of all human leadership to deliver true justice and perfectly uphold God's righteous standards. This narrative powerfully foreshadows the coming of a King who would not "walk not in his ways" like Samuel's sons, but would perfectly embody God's ways in every thought, word, and deed. Jesus, the Son of God and the righteous King, stands in stark and absolute contrast to all human leaders. He never turned aside after "lucre" or dishonest gain; instead, He emptied himself, taking on the form of a servant. He never took bribes but rather gave His very life as a ransom for many (Mark 10:45). Most importantly, Jesus never "perverted judgment"; rather, He is the righteous Judge who will administer perfect justice, judging the living and the dead with absolute truth and unwavering equity (Acts 17:31). The corruption of Samuel's sons ultimately points to the indispensable necessity of the King of kings and Lord of lords, whose eternal reign is marked by perfect righteousness, inviolable justice, and an unwavering commitment to His people, providing a stark and glorious contrast to the fleeting and flawed leadership of fallen humanity.