Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Then all the elders H2205 of Israel H3478 gathered themselves together H6908, and came H935 to Samuel H8050 unto Ramah H7414,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
All the leaders of Isra'el gathered themselves together, approached Sh'mu'el in Ramah
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
So all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah.
Ask
American Standard Version
Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel unto Ramah;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together, and came to Samuel to Ramah;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Wherefore all the Elders of Israel gathered them together, and came to Samuel vnto Ramah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And all the elders of Israel gather themselves together, and come in unto Samuel to Ramath,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 7,374 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Samuel 8:4 records the pivotal moment when all the elders of Israel, acting as the nation's collective representatives, assembled and journeyed to Samuel in Ramah. This gathering signaled a profound crisis in Israel's leadership structure, directly prompted by the corruption of Samuel's sons, and served as the formal initiation of their demand for a king, thereby setting the stage for a monumental shift from the era of judges to the monarchy.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as a crucial hinge point in the book of 1 Samuel, immediately following the detailed account of Samuel's old age and the severe misconduct of his sons, Joel and Abiah. 1 Samuel 8:1-3 meticulously outlines their perversion of justice, acceptance of bribes, and turning aside after dishonest gain. This moral failure directly precipitates the elders' decisive action described in 1 Samuel 8:4. The elders' arrival at Ramah sets the immediate scene for their explicit demand for a king "like all the nations" in 1 Samuel 8:5, marking the formal commencement of Israel's transition from a theocratic tribal confederacy led by judges to a human monarchy. Thus, this passage bridges the narratives of Samuel's judgeship and the subsequent anointing of Israel's first kings, fundamentally altering the nation's trajectory.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, the "elders" (Hebrew: zeqenim) were not merely older individuals but highly respected leaders within their respective tribes and communities. They functioned as judges, administrators, and spokesmen for the people, embodying the collective wisdom and authority of the nation. Their unified gathering, as depicted in this verse, represented a powerful, national voice, underscoring the widespread nature and gravity of the leadership crisis. The system of judges, which had governed Israel since the time of Joshua, relied on charismatic, divinely appointed leaders who emerged to address specific threats or administer justice. However, this system lacked a clear, hereditary succession plan, often leading to periods of instability and vulnerability. Samuel, as the last of the great judges and a revered prophet, held unparalleled authority. Ramah, his hometown, was a significant center for his judicial and prophetic ministry, making it the natural and respectful location for the elders to present their grievances and demands directly to him. The underlying cultural aspiration was a desire for greater stability and conformity to the governmental structures of surrounding nations, which typically operated under monarchical rule.
  • Key Themes: 1 Samuel 8:4 powerfully introduces and develops several key themes central to the book of 1 Samuel and broader biblical theology. Firstly, it highlights a profound Crisis of Leadership, stemming directly from the moral failings of Samuel's sons. Their corruption undermined public trust in the existing divine-human leadership model, emphasizing the critical importance of integrity in those who govern God's people. Secondly, the phrase "all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together" underscores Corporate Action and National Unity. This was not a localized complaint but a concerted effort by the representatives of the entire nation, signifying a collective desire for fundamental change. Thirdly, and most significantly, this verse is the immediate prelude to the Transition of Authority from the judges to the monarchy. It marks the beginning of Israel's journey towards a new form of governance, driven by a human desire for a king "like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:5), rather than a full reliance on God's unique covenantal relationship with them as His chosen people. This tension between divine sovereignty and human preference for visible, worldly leadership becomes a dominant motif throughout the historical books.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • elders (Hebrew, zâqên, H2205): From the root meaning "old," this term refers not merely to age but to recognized leaders, heads of families, clans, and tribes within Israelite society. These were individuals who held significant judicial, administrative, and representative authority. The use of "all the elders" in this context signifies a comprehensive, national consensus, representing the unified voice and widespread concern of the twelve tribes, not merely a localized grievance. Their collective presence indicates a formal and authoritative delegation.
  • gathered themselves together (Hebrew, qâbats, H6908): This verb, used here in a reflexive form (Hithpael), emphasizes a deliberate, intentional, and self-initiated assembly. It conveys a sense of formal deliberation and unified purpose among the elders, indicating that their meeting was not spontaneous but a planned, organized delegation. This active gathering underscores the gravity of the situation and the collective resolve of the nation's leadership to address the crisis at hand.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Then all the elders of Israel": This phrase identifies the authoritative body initiating the action. The inclusion of "all" emphasizes the comprehensive and unified nature of their representation, indicating that this was a national, rather than a regional or factional, movement. These elders were the established, respected leaders and spokesmen for the people, holding legitimate authority to address the nation's concerns and articulate its collective will.
  • "gathered themselves together,": This clause highlights the deliberate and organized nature of their assembly. It was a formal convention, signifying the gravity of the situation and their unified purpose. The reflexive act of gathering suggests a prior consultation or agreement among them, leading to a concerted and intentional effort to confront the leadership crisis facing Israel.
  • "and came to Samuel unto Ramah,": This specifies their destination and the object of their visit. Ramah was Samuel's hometown and the central hub of his judicial and prophetic ministry. Their journey to him signifies their respect for his established authority as the last great judge and prophet, and their intent to present their grievances and demands directly to the highest spiritual and judicial leader of the land, seeking his counsel and action.

Literary Devices

The verse employs Foreshadowing, as the gathering of the elders in Ramah is the direct catalyst for Israel's demand for a king, thereby foreshadowing the end of the judgeship and the establishment of the monarchy, a major thematic arc of 1 Samuel. The phrase "all the elders of Israel" functions as a form of Synecdoche, where a part (the elders, as representatives) represents the whole (the entire nation of Israel), emphasizing the widespread nature of the discontent and the collective will of the people. The specific mention of "Ramah" serves as an important Setting, grounding the narrative in a familiar and significant location associated with Samuel's authority and ministry, thereby lending weight and authenticity to the elders' formal appeal and the momentous decision that would follow.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse introduces a pivotal moment where Israel, facing a crisis of leadership and a perceived instability in their theocratic system, turns to human solutions rather than seeking divine guidance for the existing structure. The elders' demand for a king, while seemingly pragmatic, subtly reveals a deeper theological tension: a desire to conform to the nations around them, potentially undermining their unique identity as God's chosen people governed directly by Him through judges and prophets. This action raises profound questions about trust in God's unconventional ways versus the human inclination towards conventional, visible authority. It sets the stage for a complex relationship between human monarchy and divine sovereignty, a theme explored throughout the Old Testament, demonstrating how human choices can impact divine plans, yet God's ultimate purposes prevail.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The gathering of the elders in 1 Samuel 8:4 serves as a powerful reminder of the profound impact of leadership, particularly when integrity is compromised. When those in positions of trust, whether in spiritual communities, families, or public life, fail in their moral duties, it can create a crisis of confidence that ripples through the entire community, prompting a desire for radical change. This passage challenges us to reflect on our own responses to perceived instability or dissatisfaction. Do we, like the elders, immediately seek solutions that conform to worldly patterns, or do we first seek God's wisdom and trust in His often unconventional, yet perfect, plans? It underscores the importance of holding leaders accountable for their integrity and, more profoundly, of cultivating a deep reliance on God's sovereign provision rather than succumbing to the human tendency to mimic external norms for security or prestige. For believers today, it prompts introspection on where our ultimate trust lies: in human systems and structures, or in the unfailing faithfulness of God, who often works in ways that defy human expectations but always for our ultimate good and His glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the failure of leadership, as seen with Samuel's sons, impact the trust and stability of a community today, whether in the church or society?
  • In what ways might we, like the elders, be tempted to seek "solutions like all the nations" (i.e., worldly solutions) rather than trusting in God's unique design for our lives or communities?
  • What is the balance between seeking wise human counsel and leadership, and relying solely on divine guidance and intervention in times of crisis?
  • How can we, as individuals and communities of faith, cultivate integrity in leadership and foster a culture of accountability that honors God and serves others?

FAQ

Who were "all the elders of Israel" mentioned in this verse?

Answer: The "elders of Israel" were the recognized and respected leaders of the various tribes and clans within Israelite society. They were typically older, experienced men who held significant authority in judicial, administrative, and representative capacities. Their collective gathering, as described in 1 Samuel 8:4, indicates that they represented the unified voice and widespread concerns of the entire nation, not just a local faction. They acted as the official spokesmen for the people in matters of national importance and were empowered to bring serious grievances to figures like Samuel.

Why did the elders gather and come to Samuel in Ramah?

Answer: The elders gathered and came to Samuel in Ramah primarily because of the severe corruption and perversion of justice by Samuel's sons, Joel and Abiah, whom Samuel had appointed as judges in Beersheba (1 Samuel 8:1-3). This crisis in leadership, coupled with Samuel's old age and the apparent lack of a worthy successor in his sons, led the elders to seek a more stable and reliable form of governance. Ramah was Samuel's hometown and the center of his prophetic and judicial ministry, making it the natural and respectful place for them to present their grievances and their subsequent demand for a king (1 Samuel 8:5) directly to him, as the highest spiritual and judicial authority.

What was the significance of this meeting for Israel's history?

Answer: This meeting, described in 1 Samuel 8:4, was profoundly significant as it marked the formal initiation of Israel's transition from the era of judges to the monarchy. It was the moment when the nation, through its representatives, formally articulated its desire for a king "like all the nations" (1 Samuel 8:5). This demand, though displeasing to Samuel and ultimately to God (1 Samuel 8:6-7), set in motion the events that would lead to the anointing of Saul as Israel's first king, fundamentally altering Israel's political, social, and spiritual landscape for centuries to come. It represented a turning point from a direct theocracy to a monarchy, with profound theological implications for Israel's covenant relationship with God.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The elders' demand for a human king in 1 Samuel 8:4-5 reflects humanity's deep-seated yearning for visible, tangible leadership, often preferring worldly models over divine provision. This desire, born out of the failure of human judges and a lack of trust in God's unique covenantal rule, ultimately points to the profound need for a perfect, incorruptible King. While Israel sought a king "like all the nations," the Old Testament narrative, particularly through the Davidic covenant (2 Samuel 7:12-16), continually points forward to a greater King, one whose reign would be eternal and whose justice would be perfect. Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of this longing. He is the true King of Israel, not just a human monarch, but the Son of God, whose kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36), yet rules over all creation as the "King of kings and Lord of lords" (Revelation 19:16). Unlike Samuel's corrupt sons or the flawed human kings that followed, Jesus perfectly embodies righteousness and justice, being the "Prince of Peace" whose government will never end (Isaiah 9:6-7). He is the Good Shepherd who lays down His life for His sheep (John 10:11), fulfilling the leadership Israel truly needed but often failed to recognize in their pursuit of worldly conformity. In Christ, we find the perfect, eternal King who addresses the deepest crisis of humanity—our sin—and establishes a kingdom of everlasting peace and righteousness (Luke 1:32-33).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Samuel 8 verses 4–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the starting of a matter perfectly new and surprising, which was the setting up of kingly government in Israel. Perhaps the thing had been often talked of among them by those that were given to change and affected that which looked great. But we do not find that it was ever till now publicly proposed and debated. Abimelech was little better than a titular king, though he is said to reign over Israel (Jdg 9:22), and perhaps his fall had for a great while rendered the title of king odious in Israel, as that of Tarquinius did among the Romans; but, if it had, by this time the odium was worn off, and some bold steps are here taken towards so great a revolution as that amounted to. Here is,

I. The address of the elders to Samuel in this matter (Sa1 8:4, Sa1 8:5): They gathered themselves together, by common consent; and not in a riotous tumultuous manner, but with the respect due to his character, they came to him to his house as Ramah with their address, which contained,

1.A remonstrance of their grievances: in short, Thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways. Many a fairer occasion that people had had to ask a king, when they were oppressed by their neighbours or embroiled at home for want of a king in Israel, but a small thing will serve factious spirits for a colour to desire a change. (1.) It was true that Samuel was old; but if that made him less able to ride the circuit, and sit long on the bench, yet it made him the more wise and experienced, and, upon that account, the fitter to rule. If he was old, had he not grown old in their service? And it was very unkind, ungrateful, nay, and unjust, to cast him off when he was old, who had spent his days in doing them good. God had saved his youth from being despicable (Sa1 3:20), yet they make his old age so, which should have been counted worthy of double honour. If old people be upbraided with their infirmities, and laid aside for them, let them not think it strange; Samuel himself was so. (2.) It was true that his sons did not walk in his ways; the more was his grief, but they could not say it was his fault: he had not, like Eli, indulged them in their badness, but was ready to receive complaints against them. And, if that had been the thing desired, we may well suppose, upon the making out of the charge of bribery against them he would have superseded their commissions and punished them. But this would not content the elders of Israel; they had another project in their head.

2.A petition for the redress of these grievances, by setting a king over them: Make us a king to judge us like all the nations. Thus far it was well, that they did not rise up in rebellion against Samuel and set up a king for themselves, vi et armis - by force; but they applied to Samuel, God's prophet, and humbly begged of him to do it. But it appears by what follows that it was an evil proposal and ill made, and was displeasing to God. God designed them a king, a man after his own heart, when Samuel was dead; but they would anticipate God's counsel, and would have one now that Samuel was old. They had a prophet to judge them, that had immediate correspondence with heaven, and therein they were great and happy above any nation, none having God so nigh unto them as they had, Deu 4:7. But this would not serve; they must have a king to judge them with external pomp and power, like all the nations. A poor prophet in a mantle, though conversant in the visions of the Almighty, looked mean in the eyes of those who judged by outward appearance; but a king in a purple robe, with his guards and officers of state, would look great: and such a one they must have. They knew it was in vain to court Samuel to take upon him the title and dignity of a king, but he must appoint them one. They do not say, "Give us a king that is wise and good, and will judge better than thy sons do," but, "Give us a king," any body that will but make a figure. Thus foolishly did they forsake their own mercies, and, under pretence of advancing the dignity of their nation to that of their neighbours, did really thrust themselves down from their own excellency, and profane their crown by casting it to the ground.

II. Samuel's resentment of this address, Sa1 8:6. Let us see how he took it. 1. It cut him to the heart. Probably it was a surprise to him, and he had not any intimation before of their design, which made it the more grievous. The thing displeased Samuel; not when they upbraided him with his own infirmities and his children's irregularities (he could patiently bear what reflected on himself and his own family), but it displeased him when they said, Give us a king to judge us, because that reflected upon God and his honour. 2. It drove him to his knees; he gave them no answer for the present, but took time to consider of what they proposed, and prayed unto the Lord for direction what to do, spreading the case before him and leaving it with him, and so making himself easy. Samuel was a man much in prayer, and we are encouraged in every thing to make our requests known to God, Phi 4:6. When any thing disturbs us, it is our interest, as well as our duty, to show before God our trouble, and he gives us leave to be humbly free with him.

III. The instruction God gave him concerning this matter. Those that in straits seek to God shall find him nigh unto them, and ready to direct them. He tells him,

1.That which would be an allay to his displeasure. Samuel was much disturbed at the proposal: it troubled him greatly to see his prophetic office thus slighted, and all the good turns he had done to Israel thus ungratefully returned; but God tells him he must not think it either hard or strange. (1.) He must not think it hard that they had put this slight upon him, for they had herein put a slight upon God himself: "They have not rejected thee only, but they have rejected me. I share with thee in the affront," Sa1 8:7. Note, If God interest himself in the indignities that are done us, and the contempts that are put upon us, we may well afford to bear them patiently; nor need we think the worse of ourselves if for his sake we bear reproach (Psa 69:7), but rather rejoice and count it an honour, Col 1:24. Samuel must not complain that they were weary of his government, though just and gentle, for really they were weary of God's government; this was what they disliked: They have rejected me, that I should not reign over them. God reigns over the heathen (Psa 47:8), over all the world, but the government of Israel had hitherto been, in a more peculiar manner than ever any government was, a Theocracy, a divine government; their judges had their call and commission immediately from God; the affairs of their nation were under his peculiar direction. As the constitution, so the administration of their government, was by Thus saith the Lord; this method they were weary of, though it was their honour and safety, above any thing, so long as they kept in with God. They were indeed so much the more exposed to calamities if they provoked God to anger by sin, and found they could not transgress at so cheap a rate as other nations could, which perhaps was the true reason why they desired to stand upon the same terms with God that other nations did. (2.) He must not think it strange, nor marvel at the matter, for they do as they always have done: According to all the works which they have done, since the day that I brought them out of Egypt, so do they unto thee, Sa1 8:8; They had at first been so very respectful and obsequious to Samuel that he began to hope they were cured of their old stubborn disposition; but now he found himself deceived in them, and must not be surprised at it. They had always been rude to their governors, witness Moses and Aaron; nay, They have forsaken me and served other gods; the greatness of their crime, in affecting new gods, may make this crime of affecting new governors seem little. Samuel might expect they would deal treacherously, for they were called transgressors from the womb, Isa 48:8. This had been their manner from their youth up, Jer 22:21.

2.He tells him that which would be an answer to their demand. Samuel would not have known what to say if God had not instructed him. Should he oppose the motion, it would bespeak a greater fondness of power and dominion than did become a prophet, and an indulgence of his sons. Should he yield to the motion, it would look like the betraying of his trust, and he would become accessory to all the bad consequences of a change. Aaron sinned in gratifying the people when they said, Make us gods; Samuel dares not therefore comply with them when they say, Make us a king, but he gives them, with assurance, the answer God sent them.

(1.)He must tell them that they shall have a king. Hearken to the voice of the people, Sa1 8:7, and again, Sa1 8:9. Not that God was pleased with their request, but, as sometimes he crosses us in love, so at other times he gratifies us in wrath; he did so here. When they said, Give us a king and princes he gave them a king in his anger (see Hos 13:10, Hos 13:11), as he gave them quails, Psa 106:15; Psa 78:29. God bade Samuel humour them in this matter, [1.] That they might be beaten with their own rod, and might feel, to their cost, the difference between his government and the government of a king; see Ch2 12:8. It soon appeared how much worse their condition was, in all respects, under Saul, than it had been under Samuel. [2.] To prevent something worse. If they were not gratified, they would either rise in rebellion against Samuel or universally revolt from their religion and admit the gods of the nations, that they might have kings like them. Rather than so, let them have a king. [3.] God knows how to bring glory to himself out of it, and to serve his own wise purposes even by their foolish counsels.

(2.)But he must tell them, withal, that when they have a king they will soon have enough of him, and will, when it is too late, repent of their choice. This he must protest solemnly to them (Sa1 8:9), that, if they would have a king to rule them, as the eastern kings ruled their subjects, they would find the yoke exceedingly heavy. They looked only at the pomp or magnificence of a king, and thought that would make their nation great and considerable among its neighbours, and would strike a terror upon their enemies; but he must bid them consider how they would like to bear the charges of that pomp, and how they would endure that arbitrary power which the neighbouring kings assumed. Note, Those that set their hearts inordinately upon any thing in this world ought, for the moderating of their desires, to consider the inconveniences as well as the conveniences that will attend it, and to set the one over against the other in their thoughts. Those that submit to the government of the world and the flesh are told plainly what hard masters they are, and what a tyranny the dominion of sin is; and yet they will exchange God's government for it.

IV. Samuel's faithful delivery of God's mind to them, Sa1 8:10. He told them all the words of the Lord, how ill he resented it, that he construed it a rejecting of him, and compared it with their serving other gods, - that he would grant their request if they insisted on it, but withal had ordered him to represent to them the certain consequences of their choice, that they would be such that if they had any reason left them, and would allow themselves to consult their own interest, they would withdraw their petition, and beg to continue as they were. Accordingly he lays before them, very particularly, what would be, not the right of a king in general, but the manner of the king that should reign over them, according to the pattern of the nations, Sa1 8:11. Samuel does not speak (as bishop Patrick expounds it) of a just and honest right of a king to do these things, for his right is quite otherwise described in that part of Moses's law which concerns the king's duty, but such a right as the kings of the nations had then acquired. This shall be the manner of the king, that is, "thus he must support his dignity at the expense of that which is dearest to you, and thus he will abuse his power, as those that have power are apt to do; and, having the militia in his hand, you will be under a necessity of submitting to him."

1.If they will have such a king as the nations have, let them consider, (1.) That king must have a great retinue, abundance of servants to wait on him, grooms to look after his chariots and horses, gentlemen to ride about with him, and footmen to run before his chariots. This is the chief grandeur of princes, and the imaginary glory of great men, to have a multitude of attendants. And whence must he have these? "Why, he will take your sons, who are free-born, have a liberal education, and whom you now have at your own disposal, and will appoint them for himself," Sa1 8:11. They must wait upon him, and be at his beck; those that used to work for their parents and themselves must work for him, ear his ground, and reap his harvest (Sa1 8:12), and count it their preferment too, Sa1 8:16. This would be a great change. (2.) He must keep a great table; he will not be content to dine with his neighbours upon a sacrifice, as Samuel used to do (Sa1 9:13); but he must have a variety of dainty dishes, forced meats, and sweet-meats, and delicate sauces; and who must prepare him these? "Why, he will take your daughters, the most ingenious and handy of them, whom you hoped to prefer to houses and tables of their own; and, whether you be willing or no, they must be his confectioners, and cooks, and bakers, and the like." (3.) "He must needs have a standing army, for guards and garrisons; and your sons, instead of being elders of your cities, and living in quiet and honour at home, must be captains over thousands and captains over fifties, and must be disposed of at the pleasure of the sovereign." (4.) "You may expect that he will have great favourites, whom, having dignified and ennobled, he must enrich, and give them estates suitable to their honour; and which way can he do that, but out of your inheritances? Sa1 8:14. He will take your fields and vineyards, which descended to you from your ancestors, and which you hoped to leave to your posterity after you, even the best of them; and will not only take them to himself (you could bear that better), but he will give them to his servants, who will be your masters, and bear rule over that for which you have laboured, How will you like that?" (5.) "He must have great revenues to maintain his grandeur and power with; and whence must he have them but from you? He will take the tenth of the fruits of your ground (Sa1 8:15), and your cattle, Sa1 8:17. You think the tenths, the double tenths, which the law of God has appointed for the support of the church, grievous enough, and grudge the payment of them; but, if you have a king, there must issue another tenth out of your estates, which will be levied with more rigour, for the support of the royal dignity. Consider the expense with the magnificence, and whether it will quit cost."

2.These would be their grievances, and, (1.) They would have none but God to complain to. Once they complained to the prince himself, and were answered, according to the manner of the king, Your yoke is heavy, and I will add to it, Kg1 12:11. (2.) When they complained to God he would not hear them, Sa1 8:18. Nor could they expect that he should, both because they had been deaf to his calls and admonitions, and this trouble, in particular, they had brought upon themselves by rejecting him, and would not believe when he told them what would come of it. Note, When we bring ourselves into distress by our own irregular desires and projects we justly forfeit the comfort of prayer and the benefit of divine aids, and, if God be not better to us than we deserve, must have our relief in our own hands, and then it is bad with us.

V. The people's obstinacy in their demand, Sa1 8:19, Sa1 8:20. One would think such a representation of the consequences as this was, coming from God himself, who can neither deceive by his word nor be deceived in his knowledge, should have prevailed with them to waive their request: but their hearts were upon it, right or wrong, good or evil: "We will have a king over us, whatever God or Samuel say to the contrary; we will have a king, whatever it cost us, and whatever inconvenience we bring upon ourselves or our posterity by it." See their folly. 1. They were quite deaf to reason and blind to their own interest. They could not answer Samuel's arguments against it, nor deny the force of them, and yet they grow more violent in their request, and more insolent. Before it was, "Pray, make us a king;" now it is, "Nay, but we will have a king; yea, that we will, because we will; nor will we bear to have any thing said against it." See the absurdity of inordinate desires, and how they rob men of their reason. 2. They could not stay God's time. God had intimated to them in the law that, in due time, Israel should have a king (Deu 17:14, Deu 17:15), and perhaps they had some intimation that the time was at hand; but they are all in haste: "We, in our day, will have this king over us." Could they but have waited ten or twelve years longer they would have had David, a king of God's giving in mercy, and all the calamities that attended the setting up of Saul would have been prevented. Sudden resolves and hasty desires make work for a long and leisurely repentance. 3. That which they aimed at in desiring a king was not only, as before, that they might be like the nations, and levelled with the one above whom God had so far advanced them, but that they might have one to judge them, and to go out before them when they took the field, and to fight their battles. Foolish people and unwise! Could they ever desire a battle better fought for them that the last was, by Samuel's prayer and God's thunder? Sa1 7:10. Was victory hereby too sure to them? And were they fond of trying the chance of war at the same uncertainty that others did? So sick, it seems, were they of their privileges: and what was the issue? Their first king was slain in a battle, which none of their judges ever were; so was Josiah, one of the last and best.

VI. The dismissing of them with an intimation that very shortly they should have what they asked. 1. Samuel rehearsed all their words in the ears of the Lord, v. 21. Not but that God perfectly knew it, without Samuel's report; but thus he dealt faithfully between God and Israel, as a prophet, returning the answer to him that sent him; and thus he waited on God for further direction. God is fully acquainted with the state of the case we are in care and doubt about, but he will know it from us. His rehearsing it in the ears of the Lord intimates that it was done in private; for the people were not disposed to join with him in prayer to God for direction in this matter; also it bespeaks a holy familiarity, to which God graciously admits his people: they speak in the ears of the Lord, as one friend whispers with another; their communion with God is meat they have to eat which the world knows not of, Joh 4:32. 2. God gave direction that they should have a king, since they were so inordinately set upon it (Sa1 8:22): "Make them a king, and let them make their best of him, and thank themselves if that very pomp and power which they are so eager to see their sovereign in be their plague and burden." So he gave them up to their own hearts' lusts. Samuel told them this, but sent them home for the present, every man to his city; for the designation of the person must be left to God; they had now no more to do. When God saw fit to notify the choice to Samuel they should hear further from him; in the mean time let them keep the peace and expect the issue.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 4–22. Public domain.
Copy as
CyprianAD 258
Epistle LXIV
And that we may know that this voice of God came forth with His true and highest majesty to honour and avenge His priests; when three of the ministers -Korah, Dathan, and Abiram-dared to deal proudly, and to exalt their neck against Aaron the priest, and to equal themselves with the priest set over them; they were swallowed up and devoured by the opening of the earth, and so immediately suffered the penalty of their sacrilegious audacity. Nor they alone, but also two hundred and fifty others, who were their companions in boldness, were consumed by a fire breaking forth from the Lord, that it might be proved that God's priests are avenged by Him who makes priests. In the book of Kings also, when Samuel the priest was despised by the Jewish people on account of his age, as you are now, the Lord in wrath exclaimed, and said, "They have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me." And that He might avenge this, He set over them Saul as a king, who afflicted them with grievous injuries, and trod on the people, and pressed down their pride with all insults and penalties, that the despised priest might he avenged by divine vengeance on a proud people.
Pseudo-IgnatiusAD 400
LETTER TO THE MAGNESIANS 3
It is becoming, therefore, that you also should be obedient to your bishop and contradict him in nothing; for it is a fearful thing to contradict any such person. For no one does [by such conduct] deceive him that is visible but does [in reality] seek to mock him that is invisible, who, however, cannot be mocked by anyone. And every such act has respect not to man but to God. For God says to Samuel, “They have not mocked you, but me.”
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Samuel
Therefore, all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel, etc. Therefore, after the ascension of the Lord, all the elders of carnal Israel gathered together against him, and sent out to follow him into Ramah, that is, into the heights of heaven, where whatever we do on earth is quickly revealed, saying: 'We do not want this man to reign over us' (Luke 19); and as if speaking to him who can hide nothing, they said: 'Behold, they said, your faith and love in us have grown old, and the sons whom you have nurtured and lifted up, they have despised you' (Isaiah 1). Therefore, we preferred, like the nations that did not know you, and the kingdoms that did not call on your name, to remain strangers to your leadership rather than be deprived of the kingdom, faith, and homeland of your grace. For if, leaving the skill of fighting, we follow the simplicity of your doctrine, the Romans will come and take away our place and our nation. This indeed the Jews, though not in voice, at least in their depraved mind and intention, spoke against the Lord and against His Christ.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Samuel 8:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.