1 Kings 2:43

KJV

Why then hast thou not kept the oath of the LORD, and the commandment that I have charged thee with?

KJV (with Strong's)

Why then hast thou not kept {H8104} the oath {H7621} of the LORD {H3068}, and the commandment {H4687} that I have charged {H6680} thee with?

Complete Jewish Bible

Why, then, haven't you kept the oath of ADONAI and the mitzvah I charged you with?"

Berean Standard Bible

So why have you not kept your oath to the LORD and the command that I gave you?”

American Standard Version

Why then hast thou not kept the oath of Jehovah, and the commandment that I have charged thee with?

Commentary

### SUMMARY
1 Kings 2:43 records King Solomon's direct and piercing interrogation of Shimei, a man who had previously cursed King David. Solomon's rhetorical question forcefully highlights Shimei's egregious violation of a solemn oath sworn before the LORD, which strictly forbade him from leaving Jerusalem. This pivotal moment demonstrates Solomon's unwavering resolve to consolidate his nascent kingdom, establish divine justice, and hold individuals rigorously accountable for their sworn commitments and adherence to royal decrees, particularly when those commitments involve a sacred oath to God.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** This verse serves as the climactic confrontation in a specific narrative within the broader account of Solomon's strategic consolidation of power at the outset of his reign, detailed in [1 Kings 2](/1-kings/2 "1 Kings 2 - Solomon Consolidates His Kingdom"). The preceding verses establish the background: King David, on his deathbed, had specifically charged Solomon to deal with Shimei due to his past disloyalty ([1 Kings 2:8-9](/1-kings/2-8 "1 Kings 2:8-9 - David's Charge Concerning Shimei")). Solomon, demonstrating initial mercy tempered with shrewdness, confined Shimei to Jerusalem under a strict, divinely-witnessed oath, explicitly warning him that leaving the city would result in his death ([1 Kings 2:36-37](/1-kings/2-36 "1 Kings 2:36-37 - Solomon's Command to Shimei")). Three years later, Shimei deliberately broke this binding oath by traveling to Gath to retrieve runaway servants, a fact that was reported to Solomon ([1 Kings 2:39-40](/1-kings/2-39 "1 Kings 2:39-40 - Shimei Violates His Oath")). Upon learning of this, Solomon summons Shimei, and our verse captures the king's direct and unanswerable accusation, which immediately precedes Shimei's execution ([1 Kings 2:46](/1-kings/2-46 "1 Kings 2:46 - Shimei's Execution")). This meticulously detailed sequence underscores Solomon's firm establishment of justice and authority, fulfilling his father's charge and securing his throne.

* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In the ancient Near East, and particularly within Israelite society, oaths were not mere promises but profoundly serious and legally binding commitments, frequently invoked in the name of a deity. An oath sworn "of the LORD" (YHWH) meant that God Himself was called upon as the supreme witness and guarantor of the agreement, elevating its breach from a human betrayal to a profound offense against the divine. Kings, as God's anointed representatives and earthly vice-regents, bore the sacred responsibility of upholding justice, maintaining social order, and enforcing the law within their kingdoms. Solomon's decisive actions against Shimei reflect the critical necessity for a new monarch to assert absolute authority and demonstrate unequivocally that law, covenant, and royal decrees would be strictly enforced without exception. Shimei's initial confinement to Jerusalem was a form of political probation or house arrest, a common practice to neutralize potential threats to the throne without immediate execution. His flagrant violation of this clearly defined boundary, especially given his documented history of antagonism towards David, constituted a direct challenge to Solomon's nascent authority and the stability of the entire kingdom, demanding a swift and severe response.

* **Key Themes:** The central and overarching theme permeating [1 Kings 2](/1-kings/2 "1 Kings 2 - Solomon Consolidates His Kingdom") and powerfully encapsulated in this verse is the **sanctity and dire consequences of oaths and covenants**. Shimei's oath was not merely a pragmatic promise to Solomon but a solemn vow made before God, thereby imbuing it with a profound divine dimension. This narrative powerfully reinforces the broader biblical theme of **divine justice and human accountability**, illustrating that deliberate disobedience, particularly after explicit warnings and solemn agreements, inevitably carries severe repercussions. Solomon's actions also prominently underscore the theme of **kingly authority and the establishment of order** within the kingdom. By decisively dealing with those who defied his decrees or posed a threat to the kingdom's stability, Solomon demonstrated his wisdom, resolve, and unwavering commitment to securing his throne, thereby fulfilling his father's final charge ([1 Kings 2:9](/1-kings/2-9 "1 Kings 2:9 - David's Final Words to Solomon")). Furthermore, the story subtly highlights the **principle of sowing and reaping**, as Shimei's past disloyalty and cursing of David ([2 Samuel 16:5-13](/2-samuel/16-5-13 "2 Samuel 16:5-13 - Shimei Curses David")) ultimately culminate in his demise, triggered by his own subsequent transgression.

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **kept (Hebrew, _shâmar'_):** From H8104, meaning "to hedge about (as with thorns), i.e. guard; generally, to protect, attend to, etc." In this context, it refers to the act of observing, preserving, or fulfilling a command or an oath. Solomon's accusation highlights Shimei's failure to "guard" or "observe" the terms of his oath and the king's commandment, indicating a deliberate and conscious act of disobedience rather than an oversight.
* **oath (Hebrew, _shᵉbûwʻâh'_):** From H7621, meaning "something sworn, i.e. an oath." This term denotes a solemn declaration or promise, often made under divine sanction. When explicitly linked with "of the LORD," it signifies that God Himself was invoked as the witness and enforcer of the agreement. Shimei's oath was not a casual promise but a sacred vow, a binding commitment made in the presence of the Almighty, making its breach a grave transgression with profound spiritual implications.
* **LORD (Hebrew, _Yᵉhôvâh'_):** From H3068, referring to "the self-Existent or Eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God." This is the covenant name of God (YHWH), emphasizing His personal and covenantal relationship with Israel. Its inclusion here underscores that Shimei's oath was not merely a political agreement with Solomon but a sacred covenant with God Himself. To break an oath made "of the LORD" was to directly defy God's very authority, character, and holiness, thereby inviting divine judgment.
* **commandment (Hebrew, _mitsvâh'_):** From H4687, meaning "a command, whether human or divine (collectively, the Law)." While often referring to God's divine laws, here it refers to the king's specific directive or charge. Solomon's "commandment" to Shimei was a clear, unambiguous instruction, given with the full weight and authority of the throne. Its direct connection to the "oath of the LORD" indicates that Shimei's failure was a dual offense: a breach against a divine covenant and a direct act of insubordination against a royal decree.
* **charged (Hebrew, _tsâvâh'_):** From H6680, a primitive root meaning "(intensively) to constitute, enjoin; appoint, (for-) bid, (give a) charge, (give a, give in, send with) command(-er, -ment), send a messenger, put, (set) in order." This verb emphasizes the authoritative and deliberate nature of Solomon's instruction to Shimei. It was not a suggestion but a formal, binding command, given with the full weight of the king's authority, making Shimei's disobedience a direct affront to the royal mandate.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"Why then hast thou not kept the oath of the LORD,"**: This opening rhetorical question serves as a direct, unanswerable accusation. Solomon is not seeking information but rather highlighting Shimei's blatant, inexcusable, and self-evident transgression. The immediate emphasis on "the oath of the LORD" instantly elevates the severity of Shimei's breach from a mere political misstep to a profound spiritual offense, implying divine witness, divine sanction, and impending divine judgment. It underscores the sacred, binding nature of the vow that Shimei had so carelessly disregarded.
* **"and the commandment that I have charged thee with?"**: This second clause powerfully reinforces the first, emphasizing Shimei's direct and conscious disobedience to Solomon's explicit, authoritative instruction. It serves as a stern reminder to Shimei, and to the reader, that he was fully aware of the precise conditions of his reprieve and the severe consequences that would follow any violation. This demonstrates that Solomon's administration of justice was not arbitrary or capricious but was firmly predicated upon Shimei's own choices and his deliberate failure to honor a clear, binding agreement, which he had willingly entered into.

#### Literary Devices
The verse primarily employs a **Rhetorical Question**, "Why then hast thou not kept...?" This powerful device is not used to elicit an answer, as Shimei's guilt is self-evident, but rather to emphasize the undeniable nature of his transgression and the egregious character of his actions. It serves to highlight Solomon's righteous indignation and the profound gravity of Shimei's offense. There is also a strong element of **Irony** in Shimei's ultimate fate; the man who once audaciously cursed King David and threw stones at him ([2 Samuel 16:5-13](/2-samuel/16-5-13 "2 Samuel 16:5-13 - Shimei Curses David")) now finds himself on the receiving end of severe and inescapable judgment, directly brought about by his own disloyalty and broken word. This narrative also functions as a form of **Foreshadowing**, as David's earlier, prophetic charge to Solomon concerning Shimei ([1 Kings 2:8-9](/1-kings/2-8-9 "1 Kings 2:8-9 - David's Charge Concerning Shimei")) is now definitively and justly fulfilled, demonstrating Solomon's unwavering commitment to securing his kingdom and upholding justice as per his father's dying wishes.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The gravity of Shimei's broken oath in [1 Kings 2:43](/1-kings/2-43 "1 Kings 2:43 - Solomon Confronts Shimei") reverberates with profound theological significance concerning the nature of vows, divine faithfulness, and human accountability. In ancient Israel, an oath sworn in the name of the LORD was considered a sacred act, placing the individual under a direct and weighty divine obligation. God Himself was invoked as the supreme witness and enforcer, meaning that a breach was not merely a human betrayal but a direct affront to God's holy name and His immutable character. This narrative powerfully highlights God's unwavering expectation of integrity, truthfulness, and faithfulness from His people, mirroring His own perfect and unwavering faithfulness to His covenants. Shimei's tragic fate serves as a stark and enduring reminder that while God is abundant in mercy, He is also perfectly just, and He holds His people rigorously accountable for their solemn commitments, especially those made explicitly in His holy name.

* [Numbers 30:2](/numbers/30-2 "The Law Concerning Vows")
* [Deuteronomy 23:21-23](/deuteronomy/23-21-23 "Keeping Vows to the LORD")
* [Ecclesiastes 5:4-5](/ecclesiastes/5-4-5 "Wisdom on Vows")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The compelling account of Shimei's confrontation with Solomon serves as a powerful and enduring lesson on the profound importance of personal integrity, the sanctity of our spoken word, and the inevitable, often severe, consequences of disobedience. In a contemporary world where promises are frequently made lightly and broken with ease, this passage calls us to embrace a far higher standard of ethical and spiritual conduct. It serves as a potent reminder that when we make commitments, particularly those invoked before God or in His holy name, they carry immense divine weight and spiritual significance. Our "yes" should unequivocally mean yes, and our "no" should truly mean no, thereby reflecting the very character of a God who is utterly faithful and true to all His promises. Shimei's dramatic downfall underscores that a casual disregard for legitimate authority, coupled with a flippant attitude towards solemn vows, can lead to devastating repercussions, not only in our earthly relationships and societal standing but profoundly in our spiritual walk and relationship with God. This narrative challenges each of us to deeply consider the long-term impact of our choices and to diligently cultivate a profound reverence for truth, faithfulness, and integrity in every facet of our lives, recognizing that our words and actions have eternal implications.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How seriously do I approach my promises and commitments, both those made to God and those made to other people?**
* **In what specific areas of my life might I be tempted to disregard clear instructions, solemn vows, or sacred obligations?**
* **What profound lessons does Shimei's story impart concerning the principle of accountability and the ultimate consequences of deliberate disobedience?**
* **How can I actively cultivate greater integrity, trustworthiness, and faithfulness in my daily interactions, thereby more accurately reflecting God's own unwavering character?**

### FAQ

**Why was Shimei's punishment so severe for simply leaving the city?**

Answer: Shimei's punishment was severe not simply for the act of leaving Jerusalem, but primarily for breaking a solemn oath he had sworn "of the LORD" before King Solomon ([1 Kings 2:37](/1-kings/2-37 "1 Kings 2:37 - Solomon's Charge to Shimei")). This oath was a binding agreement, made under divine witness, and its violation was considered an extremely grave offense against both God and the king. Furthermore, Shimei had a documented history of disloyalty, having publicly cursed and reviled King David, Solomon's father ([2 Samuel 16:5-13](/2-samuel/16-5-13 "2 Samuel 16:5-13 - Shimei Curses David")). His initial confinement to Jerusalem was an act of conditional mercy, a political probation. His deliberate and knowing breach of the oath, despite explicit warnings of the consequences, demonstrated a continued defiance of royal authority and a profound disregard for sacred commitments. Solomon, in the critical early stages of consolidating his new kingdom, needed to establish firm justice and demonstrate unequivocally that no one, regardless of their past status or influence, was above the law or the king's word, especially when that word was backed by a divine oath. This act was crucial for the stability and security of his reign.

**What does "the oath of the LORD" imply about the nature of Shimei's transgression?**

Answer: "The oath of the LORD" (Hebrew: _shevu'at YHWH_) signifies that God Himself, the covenant-keeping God of Israel, was invoked as the supreme witness and guarantor of Shimei's promise. In ancient Israelite culture, an oath sworn by the divine name was the most sacred and binding form of commitment imaginable. It meant that the individual was placing themselves directly under God's judgment and curse if they failed to uphold their word. Therefore, Shimei's transgression was far more than a mere breach of contract with Solomon; it was a direct and profound offense against God Himself. It implied a deep disrespect for God's holiness, His authority, and His role as the ultimate upholder of truth and justice. This elevated the seriousness of Shimei's actions, transforming his failure to keep his word into a spiritual crime as well as a civil one, thereby warranting divine retribution as administered by God's anointed king.

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The narrative of Shimei's broken oath and its severe consequences in [1 Kings 2:43](/1-kings/2-43 "1 Kings 2:43 - Solomon Confronts Shimei") profoundly illuminates the perfect faithfulness of Christ and the redemptive nature of God's new covenant. Shimei's tragic failure to keep his word, despite a clear command and a solemn oath, stands in stark and absolute contrast to Jesus Christ, who is the ultimate embodiment of perfect obedience and unwavering faithfulness. While Shimei's broken oath led directly to his death, Jesus perfectly fulfilled every promise, every prophecy, and every commandment of God, even to the point of His sacrificial death on the cross ([Philippians 2:8](/philippians/2-8 "Philippians 2:8 - Christ's Obedience to Death")). He is revealed as the "Amen, the faithful and true witness" ([Revelation 3:14](/revelation/3-14 "Revelation 3:14 - Jesus, the Faithful Witness")), in whom all of God's magnificent promises find their resounding "Yes" and "Amen" ([2 Corinthians 1:20](/2-corinthians/1-20 "2 Corinthians 1:20 - God's Promises are Yes in Christ")). The old covenant, under which Shimei's oath fell, served to highlight humanity's inherent inability to perfectly keep God's commands and vows, inevitably leading to judgment. However, through Christ's perfectly righteous life, His atoning sacrifice, and His glorious resurrection, a new and superior covenant is established. This covenant is not based on fallible human works or broken oaths, but entirely on God's unwavering grace, His eternal faithfulness, and the precious blood of Jesus ([Hebrews 8:6-13](/hebrews/8-6-13 "Hebrews 8:6-13 - A Superior Covenant")). In Christ, we find complete forgiveness for our own broken promises and a new, divinely empowered capacity, through the indwelling Holy Spirit, to live lives of profound integrity and faithfulness that truly honor God, thereby fulfilling the spirit of the law that Shimei so tragically violated.

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

2 Samuel 21:2

And the king called the Gibeonites, and said unto them; (now the Gibeonites [were] not of the children of Israel, but of the remnant of the Amorites; and the children of Israel had sworn unto them: and Saul sought to slay them in his zeal to the children of Israel and Judah.)

Romans 13:5

Wherefore [ye] must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

Ecclesiastes 8:2

I [counsel thee] to keep the king's commandment, and [that] in regard of the oath of God.

2 Chronicles 30:12

Also in Judah the hand of God was to give them one heart to do the commandment of the king and of the princes, by the word of the LORD.

Ezekiel 17:18

Seeing he despised the oath by breaking the covenant, when, lo, he had given his hand, and hath done all these [things], he shall not escape.

Ezekiel 17:19

Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; [As] I live, surely mine oath that he hath despised, and my covenant that he hath broken, even it will I recompense upon his own head.