Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
I will take H3947 H8799 no bullock H6499 out of thy house H1004, nor he goats H6260 out of thy folds H4356.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
I have no need for a bull from your farm or for male goats from your pens;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
I have no need for a bull from your stall or goats from your pens,
Ask
American Standard Version
I will take no bullock out of thy house, Nor he-goats out of thy folds.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
I have no need for a bull from your stall, nor male goats from your pens.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
I will take no bullocke out of thine house, nor goates out of thy foldes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
I take not from thy house a bullock, From thy folds he goats.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Psalms 50:9 delivers a powerful divine declaration from God, spoken through the Psalmist Asaph, fundamentally challenging the prevalent, often ritualistic, understanding of worship and sacrifice in ancient Israel. This verse emphatically asserts God's absolute self-sufficiency and sovereignty, stating that He neither needs nor acquires material offerings such as bullocks or he-goats from human hands. It subtly yet profoundly redirects the focus from external religious acts to a deeper, more sincere form of worship rooted in a right heart and genuine devotion, thereby laying the groundwork for the psalm's broader critique of superficial religious practice.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Psalm 50 is structured as a dramatic "divine lawsuit" or prophetic oracle, where God Himself, appearing in majestic glory from Zion, summons heaven and earth to witness His judgment upon His covenant people, Israel. The verses immediately preceding verse 9, specifically Psalms 50:7-8, establish a crucial premise: God is not rebuking His people for a lack of sacrifices ("I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings, to have been continually before me"). This sets up a profound distinction, indicating that the problem lies not with the act of sacrifice itself, which God commanded, but with the attitude, understanding, and heart condition behind it. Verse 9 then serves as a pivotal, declarative statement, directly confronting the erroneous belief that God is somehow dependent on or enriched by human offerings. This declaration logically precedes and reinforces the expansive statement of God's universal ownership in Psalms 50:10-12, where He declares, "For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills." The psalm then transitions from critique to instruction, outlining the true nature of worship in Psalms 50:14-15 before addressing the wicked.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israelite society was intrinsically linked to the Mosaic Law, which meticulously prescribed a comprehensive system of animal sacrifices. These rituals, extensively detailed in books like Leviticus, served multiple purposes: atonement for sin, expression of thanksgiving, fulfillment of vows, and fostering communion with Yahweh. The Tabernacle, and later the Temple, served as the central place for these sacrificial rites, which were fundamental to their covenant relationship with God. However, a recurring problem, frequently denounced by the prophets, was the tendency for the people to externalize their religion. They would perform the rituals as mere obligations, or even as a means to manipulate God, believing that the act itself appeased Him, irrespective of their inner spiritual state, moral conduct, or genuine faith. Psalms 50:9, therefore, speaks directly into a context where ritualistic formalism had begun to eclipse true devotion. The "house" and "folds" refer to the personal dwellings and animal enclosures of the Israelites, from which they would bring their sacrificial animals to the sacred precincts for offering.
  • Key Themes: This verse is foundational to several profound theological and narrative themes within Psalm 50 and the broader biblical canon. Firstly, it powerfully asserts God's absolute sovereignty and ownership over all creation, dismantling any anthropocentric notion that human offerings could somehow fulfill a deficiency in the divine. The subsequent verses, Psalms 50:10-12, explicitly elaborate on this, declaring God's ownership of "every beast of the forest" and "the cattle upon a thousand hills." Secondly, the verse delivers a sharp critique of ritualism and externalism, emphasizing that outward religious acts, when divorced from genuine faith, obedience, and a transformed heart, are utterly meaningless to God. The issue was never the sacrifices themselves, which God had commanded, but the perverted attitude with which they were offered, turning a spiritual act into a mere transaction. Finally, by rejecting the need for material sacrifices, the verse sets the stage for defining the nature of true worship, which is not transactional but profoundly relational, involving heartfelt thanksgiving, the keeping of vows, and a sincere calling upon God in times of trouble, as powerfully articulated in Psalms 50:14-15.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • take (Hebrew, לָקַח, lâqach', H3947): This primitive root means "to take," "to receive," or "to acquire." The use of the negative ("I will take no") is profoundly significant. It asserts God's complete independence and self-sufficiency, implying that He lacks nothing and is not dependent on human provision to sustain Himself or His divine essence. His refusal to "take" is a declaration of His absolute fullness.
  • bullock (Hebrew, פַּר, par', H6499): Refers to a young bull, often specifically a male calf. This was a significant and costly animal, frequently prescribed for burnt offerings (Leviticus 1:3) and sin offerings, particularly for priests or the entire congregation. Its mention here signifies a valuable and common sacrificial animal, underscoring that even the most substantial and prescribed offerings are not needed by God.
  • he goats (Hebrew, עַתּוּד, ʻattûwd', H6260): Refers to male goats, often described as full-grown or leaders of the flock. These were also used in various sacrificial contexts, including peace offerings (Leviticus 3:12) and sin offerings. Paired with "bullock," it represents the full range of common, valuable animal sacrifices, emphasizing that God's declaration applies universally to all such offerings, regardless of their specific type or value.
  • folds (Hebrew, מִכְלָאָה, miklâʼâh', H4356): This word denotes a pen or enclosure specifically for flocks. Its inclusion emphasizes that the animals being discussed are those belonging to the worshipper, animals that would be taken from their personal property to be offered. This detail reinforces the idea that God is rejecting the notion of human provision for His needs.

Verse Breakdown

  • "I will take no bullock out of thy house": This clause is a direct, emphatic statement from God to His covenant people. The phrase "thy house" refers to the Israelite's personal dwelling or property, from which they would bring their animals for sacrifice. God's declaration that He will "take no bullock" directly confronts the transactional mindset that may have developed, where people believed their offerings somehow benefited or supplied God. It asserts His absolute self-sufficiency and independence from human provision.
  • "[nor] he goats out of thy folds": This second clause functions as a powerful parallel reinforcement of the first. "Thy folds" specifically refers to the enclosures where flocks of sheep and goats were kept, further emphasizing the source of these animals from the worshipper's own possessions. The conjunction "nor" strengthens the negation, making it unequivocally clear that this divine independence applies to all forms of animal sacrifice, regardless of the specific animal or its origin from their personal wealth. It underscores the comprehensive nature of God's rejection of a need for human offerings.

Literary Devices

Psalms 50:9 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound message with clarity and impact. Foremost is Anthropomorphism, where God speaks in human terms ("I will take") only to negate the very human need implied. This rhetorical strategy makes His point more relatable and impactful, allowing the audience to grasp the absurdity of thinking God needs anything from them. The verse also features clear Parallelism, specifically Synonymous Parallelism, where the phrases "bullock out of thy house" and "he goats out of thy folds" convey the same core idea through different, yet closely related, imagery. This repetition intensifies the message of God's independence and the futility of a purely external offering. Furthermore, the use of Rhetorical Negation ("I will take no...") is highly effective. It is not merely a statement of fact but a direct challenge to a prevailing misconception, designed to provoke thought, correct a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of God, and redefine the essence of true worship.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Psalms 50:9 stands as a cornerstone verse in the biblical argument for the primacy of the heart over mere ritual in worship. It powerfully dismantles any transactional theology that might creep into religious practice, where individuals mistakenly believe they can "give" God something He needs or that their external acts obligate Him. Instead, this verse aligns seamlessly with a consistent prophetic theme throughout Scripture: God desires genuine relationship, heartfelt obedience, and a contrite spirit far more than the prescribed sacrifices themselves. The offerings, divinely instituted, were always intended to be expressions of a devoted heart, not substitutes for one. This verse, therefore, serves as a potent reminder that our worship, giving, and service are not about fulfilling any perceived lack in God, but rather about expressing our profound love, boundless gratitude, and humble submission to His sovereign will and absolute ownership of all things.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Psalms 50:9 serves as an enduring and penetrating challenge to all believers across generations. In an age where religious activity can easily devolve into performance, obligation, or even a means of self-justification, this verse calls us back to the very heart of authentic worship. It compels us to deeply examine our motivations: are our acts of service, our financial contributions, our regular attendance at church, or our public displays of piety offered out of a genuine, overflowing love for God, or are they mere rituals we perform to assuage guilt, gain favor, or maintain a respectable image? God is not dependent on our "bullocks" or "he-goats"—our time, talents, or treasures—as if He lacks anything or needs our provision to be complete. He invites us to offer them as expressions of devotion, gratitude, and obedience, recognizing His absolute ownership of all things. True worship, then, is not about what we give to God to make Him complete, but about what we offer of ourselves in response to who He already is: the self-sufficient, sovereign Creator and Sustainer of all. This profound understanding liberates us from the burden of trying to impress God and invites us into the liberating joy of simply loving and obeying Him from a transformed heart.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I be offering "sacrifices" to God (e.g., time, money, service) that are devoid of genuine heart devotion or a true understanding of His sovereignty?
  • How does understanding God's absolute self-sufficiency and ownership change my perspective on giving and serving within my community or church?
  • What does it mean for me to "offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High" (Psalms 50:14) in my daily life, beyond mere ritualistic adherence?

FAQ

Does this verse mean God doesn't want us to give offerings or serve Him?

Answer: No, absolutely not. This verse is not a rejection of offerings or service, but a profound clarification of the motivation and understanding behind them. God is not dependent on human offerings; He is the Creator and Owner of everything. Therefore, when we give or serve, it is not to supply a lack in God, but rather an act of worship, gratitude, and obedience that flows from a heart devoted to Him. The psalm itself goes on to say, "Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High" (Psalms 50:14). The issue was the Israelite's heart attitude: performing rituals without genuine faith or obedience. God desires a relationship, not a transaction. Our giving and service are invited as expressions of our love and recognition of His sovereignty, as seen in passages like Romans 12:1.

How does this relate to the Old Testament sacrificial system? Was it all pointless?

Answer: The Old Testament sacrificial system, as detailed in books like Leviticus, was divinely ordained by God and served crucial purposes. It provided a means for atonement for sin, taught the seriousness of sin and the need for a substitute, and offered a way for people to express thanksgiving, make vows, and commune with God. It was never pointless. However, the prophets consistently highlighted that the effectiveness of these rituals was tied to the heart condition of the worshipper. When people performed the sacrifices as mere external acts, devoid of genuine repentance, faith, or obedience to God's moral law, the rituals became empty and displeasing to God. Psalms 50:9, along with other prophetic critiques (e.g., 1 Samuel 15:22, Hosea 6:6), emphasizes that God always desired the heart behind the offering, not just the offering itself. The system ultimately foreshadowed the ultimate, perfect sacrifice of Christ.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Psalms 50:9, with its declaration of God's independence from animal sacrifices, finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament sacrificial system, while divinely instituted and crucial for its time, was always a temporary and typological shadow, pointing forward to the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!. Jesus's death on the cross completely fulfilled the need for "bullocks" and "he-goats," rendering them obsolete as a means of atonement for sin. As the author of Hebrews powerfully argues, Christ, through His own blood, entered the holy places once for all, having obtained eternal redemption (Hebrews 9:11-14). Therefore, our worship in the New Covenant is no longer centered on animal offerings but on spiritual sacrifices, offered through Christ. We are now called to present our bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is our spiritual worship (Romans 12:1). Furthermore, we are to offer "the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name" (Hebrews 13:15), and to "do good and to share, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased" (Hebrews 13:16). This aligns perfectly with Jesus's teaching that true worship is "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24), a worship that flows from an internal transformation wrought by the Spirit, rather than external rituals or material offerings.

Copy as

Commentary on Psalms 50 verses 7–15

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

God is here dealing with those that placed all their religion in the observances of the ceremonial law, and thought those sufficient.

I. He lays down the original contract between him and Israel, in which they had avouched him to be their God, and he them to be his people, and so both parties were agreed (Psa 50:7): Hear, O my people! and I will speak. Note, It is justly expected that whatever others doe, when he speaks, his people should give ear; who will, if they do not? And then we may comfortably expect that God will speak to us when we are ready to hear what he says; even when he testifies against us in the rebukes and threatenings of his word and providences we must be forward to hear what he says, to hear even the rod and him that has appointed it.

II. He puts a slight upon the legal sacrifices, Psa 50:8, etc. Now,

1.This may be considered as looking back to the use of these under the law. God had a controversy with the Jews; but what was the ground of the controversy? Not their neglect of the ceremonial institutions; no, they had not been wanting in the observance of them, their burnt-offerings had been continually before God, they took a pride in them, and hoped by their offerings to procure a dispensation for their lusts, as the adulterous woman, Pro 7:14. Their constant sacrifices, they thought, would both expiate and excuse their neglect of the weightier matters of the law. Nay, if they had, in some degree, neglected these institutions, yet that should not have been the cause of God's quarrel with them, for it was but a small offence in comparison with the immoralities of their conversation. They thought God was mightily beholden to them for the many sacrifices they had brought to his altar, and that they had made him very much their debtor by them, as if he could not h have maintained his numerous family of priests without their contributions; but God here shows them the contrary, (1.) That he did not need their sacrifices. What occasion had he for their bullocks and goats who has the command of all the beasts of the forest, and the cattle upon a thousand hills (Psa 50:9, Psa 50:10), has an incontestable propriety in them and dominion over them, has them all always under his eye and within his reach, and can make what use he pleases of them; they all wait on him, and are all at his disposal? Psa 104:27-29. Can we add any thing to his store whose all the wild fowl and wild beasts are, the world itself and the fulness thereof? Psa 50:11, Psa 50:12. God's infinite self-sufficiency proves our utter insufficiency to add any thing to him. (2.) That he could not be benefited by their sacrifices. Their goodness, of this kind, could not possibly extend to him, nor, if they were in this matter righteous, was he the better (Psa 50:13): Will I eat the flesh of bulls? It is as absurd to think that their sacrifices could, of themselves, and by virtue of any innate excellency in them, add any pleasure of praise to God, as it would be to imagine that an infinite Spirit could be supported by meat and drink, as our bodies are. It is said indeed of the demons whom the Gentiles worshipped that they did eat the fat of their sacrifices, and drink the wine of their drink-offerings (Deu 32:38): they regaled themselves in the homage they robbed the true God of; but will the great Jehovah be thus entertained? No; to obey is better than sacrifice, and to love God and our neighbour better than all burnt-offerings, so much better that God by his prophets often told them that their sacrifices were not only not acceptable, but abominable, to him, while they lived in sin; instead of pleasing him, he looked upon them as a mockery, and therefore an affront and provocation to him; see Pro 15:8; Isa 1:11, etc.; Isa 66:3; Jer 6:20; Amo 5:21. They are therefore here warned not to rest in these performances; but to conduct themselves, in all other instances, towards God as their God.

2.This may be considered as looking forward to the abolishing of these by the gospel of Christ. Thus Dr. Hammond understands it. When God shall set up the kingdom of the Messiah he shall abolish the old way of worship by sacrifice and offerings; he will no more have those to be continually before him (Psa 50:8); he will no more require of his worshippers to bring him their bullocks and their goats, to be burnt upon his altar, Psa 50:9. For indeed he never appointed this as that which he had any need of, or took any pleasure in, for, besides that all we have is his already, he has far more beasts in the forest and upon the mountains, which we know nothing of nor have any property in, than we have in our folds; but he instituted it to prefigure the great sacrifice which his own Son should in the fulness of time offer upon the cross, to make atonement for sin, and all the other spiritual sacrifices of acknowledgment with which God, through Christ, will be well pleased.

III. He directs to the best sacrifices of prayer and praise as those which, under the law, were preferred before all burnt-offerings and sacrifices, and on which then the greatest stress was laid, and which now, under the gospel, come in the room of those carnal ordinances which were imposed until the times of reformation. He shows us here (Psa 50:14, Psa 50:15) what is good, and what the Lord our God requires of us, and will accept, when sacrifices are slighted and superseded. 1. We must make a penitent acknowledgment of our sins: Offer to God confession, so some read it, and understand it of the confession of sin, in order to our giving glory to God and taking shame to ourselves, that we may never return to it. A broken and contrite heart is the sacrifice which God will not despise, Psa 51:17. If the sin was not abandoned the sin-offering was not accepted. 2. We must give God thanks for his mercies to us: Offer to God thanksgiving, every day, often every day (seven times a day will I praise thee), and upon special occasions; and this shall please the Lord, if it come from a humble thankful heart, full of love to him and joy in him, better than an ox or bullock that has horns and hoofs, Psa 69:30, Psa 69:31. 3. We must make conscience of performing our covenants with him: Pay thy vows to the Most High, forsake thy sins, and do thy duty better, pursuant to the solemn promises thou has made him to that purport. When we give God thanks for any mercy we have received we must be sure to pay the vows we made to him when we were in the pursuit of the mercy, else our thanksgivings will not be accepted. Dr. Hammond applies this to the great gospel ordinance of the eucharist, in which we are to give thanks to God for his great love in sending his Son to save us, and to pay our vows of love and duty to him, and to give alms. Instead of all the Old Testament types of a Christ to come, we have that blessed memorial of a Christ already come. 4. In the day of distress we must address ourselves to God by faithful and fervent prayer (Psa 50:15): Call upon me in the day of trouble, and not upon any other god. Our troubles, though we see them coming from God's hand, must drive us to him, and not drive us from him. We must thus acknowledge him in all our ways, depend upon his wisdom, power, and goodness, and refer ourselves entirely to him, and so give him glory. This is a cheaper, easier, readier way of seeking his favour than by a peace-offering, and yet more acceptable. 5. When he, in answer to our prayers, delivers us, as he has promised to do in such way and time as he shall think fit, we must glorify him, not only by a grateful mention of his favour, but by living to his praise. Thus must we keep up our communion with God, meeting him with our prayers when he afflicts us and with our praises when he delivers us.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–15. Public domain.
Copy as
Augustine of HippoAD 430
Exposition on Psalm 50
What then: Do You not accept my sacrifices? "But your holocausts are always in My sight." Certain holocausts concerning which it is said in another Psalm, "If You had desired sacrifice, I would surely have given, with holocausts You will not be delighted:" and again he turns himself, "Sacrifice to God is a troubled spirit, a heart broken and humbled God does not despise." Which be then holocausts that He despises not? Which holocausts that are always in His sight? "Kindly, O Lord," he says, "deal in Your good will with Sion, and be the walls of Jerusalem built, then shall You accept the sacrifice of righteousness, oblations, and holocausts." He says that certain holocausts God will accept. But what is a holocaust? A whole consumed with fire: causis is burning, holon is whole: but a "holocaust" is a whole consumed with fire. There is a certain fire of most burning love: be the mind inflamed with love, let the same love hurry off the limbs to its use, let it not allow them to serve cupidity, in order that we may wholly glow with fire of divine love that will offer to God a holocaust. Such "holocausts of yours are in My sight always."
Augustine of HippoAD 430
EXPLANATIONS OF THE PSALMS 50:16
He is foretelling the New Covenant, under which all those old sacrifices have ceased. They had a part to play in prefiguring a special sacrifice that was to come, by the blood of which we would be cleansed.
Hesychius of JerusalemAD 450
Large COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 50:8
The Jews, hearing these things, did not believe, and they doubted they were able to happen. Now the word is proven. They no longer have the place of their sacrifice, since the temple has been destroyed, the altar collapsed and all their administration carried away, even the city overturned, in which it was necessary to sacrifice according to law.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Psalms 50:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.