Skip to content
“Israel's Sin and God's Unilateral Grace”· Isaiah 43:22–28
Translation
King James Version
Thou hast bought me no sweet cane with money, neither hast thou filled me with the fat of thy sacrifices: but thou hast made me to serve with thy sins, thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thou hast bought H7069 me no sweet cane H7070 with money H3701, neither hast thou filled H7301 me with the fat H2459 of thy sacrifices H2077: but thou hast made me to serve H5647 with thy sins H2403, thou hast wearied H3021 me with thine iniquities H5771.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
You have not spent money to buy me sweet cane or filled me with the fat of your sacrifices. Instead, you have burdened me with your sins and wearied me with your crimes.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
You have not bought Me sweet cane with your silver, nor satisfied Me with the fat of your sacrifices. But you have burdened Me with your sins; you have wearied Me with your iniquities.
Ask
American Standard Version
Thou hast bought me no sweet cane with money, neither hast thou filled me with the fat of thy sacrifices; but thou hast burdened me with thy sins, thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
You have bought me no sweet cane with money, nor have you filled me with the fat of your sacrifices; but you have burdened me with your sins. You have wearied me with your iniquities.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thou boughtest mee no sweete sauour with money, neither hast thou made mee drunke with the fatte of thy sacrifices, but thou hast made mee to serue with thy sinnes, and wearied mee with thine iniquities.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Thou hast not bought for Me with money sweet cane, And with the fat of thy sacrifices hast not filled Me, Only--thou hast caused Me to serve with thy sins, Thou hast wearied Me with thine iniquities.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 18,530 of 31,102 · 59.6%

Study This Verse

Summary

Isaiah 43:24 serves as a poignant divine lament, articulating God's profound disappointment and weariness with His covenant people, Israel. Instead of offering Him the costly and sincere worship symbolized by precious "sweet cane" or the choicest "fat of their sacrifices," the nation had continuously burdened Him with their persistent and pervasive sins and iniquities. This verse starkly highlights humanity's failure to uphold covenant responsibilities, underscoring the deep grief and exhaustion that unfaithfulness inflicts upon the Holy God, even as it sets the stage for His subsequent declaration of boundless grace.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is strategically placed within the second major section of the Book of Isaiah (chapters 40-55), often referred to as "The Book of Comfort" or "Deutero-Isaiah." While this section predominantly emphasizes God's incomparable sovereignty, His unique role as Israel's Redeemer, and glorious promises of restoration for His exiled people, chapter 43 masterfully interweaves these themes with a stark reminder of Israel's past and present spiritual failures. Following powerful declarations of God's unique identity and His unwavering promise to deliver and gather His people (e.g., Isaiah 43:1-7), this verse executes a sharp pivot, highlighting their profound spiritual negligence and unfaithfulness. The immediate juxtaposition with Isaiah 43:25 is critically important, as God's expression of weariness is immediately followed by a declaration of His unwavering grace and willingness to forgive, showcasing the paradoxical nature of divine justice and mercy within the covenant relationship.

Historical & Cultural Context

Isaiah prophesied during a tumultuous period for the Southern Kingdom of Judah, leading up to and encompassing the Babylonian exile. The people had consistently engaged in widespread idolatry, pervasive social injustice, and a ritualistic worship system that was largely devoid of true heart devotion. The references to "sweet cane" (Hebrew: qaneh bosem) and the "fat of sacrifices" are deeply embedded in the cultural and religious practices of ancient Israel. "Sweet cane" was an expensive aromatic imported from distant lands, a crucial ingredient in the holy anointing oil (as seen in Exodus 30:23) and used in incense, symbolizing costly and reverent worship. The "fat of sacrifices" was considered the choicest and most valuable part of the animal, exclusively reserved for God as His portion, as meticulously detailed in the Mosaic Law (e.g., Leviticus 3:16). Israel's failure to offer these signifies not merely a lack of material offerings but a deeper spiritual bankruptcy and a deliberate withholding of their best from God, reflecting a widespread cultural and religious apostasy that had plagued the nation for generations.

Key Themes

Isaiah 43:24 contributes significantly to several overarching themes woven throughout the Book of Isaiah. Primarily, it underscores the theme of Israel's Unfaithfulness and Rebellion, starkly contrasting God's steadfast love and redemptive purpose with their persistent and egregious sin. The powerful anthropomorphic language of God being "wearied" highlights the profound Grief and Burden of Sin from a divine perspective, revealing that human disobedience is not merely an abstract violation of law but a deeply personal affront that directly impacts and grieves the Holy One. Furthermore, the verse implicitly yet powerfully sets the stage for the overarching theme of Divine Grace and Forgiveness, as God's lament over their sin immediately precedes His astonishing declaration of blotting out their transgressions (in Isaiah 43:25). This juxtaposition emphasizes that God's ultimate character is one of boundless mercy and redemptive love, even in the face of profound human failure, a tension between divine justice and steadfast love that is a hallmark of the prophetic message.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

bought qânâh' H7069

Meaning "to procure, especially by purchase; by implication to own." In this context, it refers to the act of acquiring or providing. God is lamenting that Israel has not acquired or provided Him with the expected offerings, specifically "sweet cane," which was a valuable commodity used in sacred rituals. This highlights their spiritual negligence, stinginess, and lack of genuine devotion towards God, indicating a failure to invest in their covenant relationship.

fat cheleb' H2459

Meaning "fat, whether literally or figuratively; hence, the richest or choice part." In the Old Testament sacrificial system, the fat was considered the best, most valuable, and most pleasing portion of the animal, exclusively reserved for God as His special share. Its withholding signifies Israel's failure to offer their choicest devotion, their most valuable resources, and their purest worship to the Lord, indicating a profound lack of true reverence, commitment, and honor for the Almighty.

wearied yâgaʻ' H3021

A primitive root meaning "properly, to gasp; hence, to be exhausted, to tire, to toil." This powerful anthropomorphism conveys God's profound emotional state. It is not that the omnipotent God literally experiences physical or emotional fatigue as humans do, but this vivid imagery communicates the deep grief, burden, frustration, and exasperation that Israel's relentless, habitual, and unrepentant sinfulness caused Him. It underscores the immense spiritual cost and the personal affront of human rebellion on the divine heart.

Verse Breakdown

"Thou hast bought me no sweet cane with money,"

This initial clause highlights Israel's profound failure to provide costly, genuine, and sincere offerings. "Sweet cane" (calamus) was an expensive, imported aromatic used in sacred anointing oil and incense, symbolizing valuable and reverent worship that required effort and expenditure. God laments that they have not even expended the money to procure such offerings for Him, indicating a deep-seated neglect of their covenant responsibilities and a profound absence of heartfelt devotion and sacrifice.

"neither hast thou filled me with the fat of thy sacrifices:"

This continues and amplifies the theme of neglected and inadequate worship. The "fat of thy sacrifices" refers to the choicest and most sacred part of the sacrificial animals, which was specifically designated for God as a "pleasing aroma" and His exclusive portion. The phrase "filled me" suggests an expected abundance and completeness of such offerings. Their failure to provide this signifies that their sacrifices, if offered at all, were lacking in quality, quantity, or sincerity, failing to truly honor God or fulfill the spirit of the sacrificial system.

"but thou hast made me to serve with thy sins,"

This marks a sharp and devastating contrast, pivoting from their neglect of worship to their active offense. Instead of serving God through worship, obedience, and devotion, Israel's continuous and pervasive actions have, anthropomorphically speaking, forced God to "serve" their sins. This implies that God, in His infinite patience and long-suffering, has had to bear the burden and consequences of their continuous transgressions, dealing with the fallout of their rebellion rather than receiving honor and joyful service.

"thou hast wearied me with thine iniquities."

This final clause intensifies the previous one, emphasizing the cumulative, exhaustive, and deeply personal effect of Israel's persistent disobedience. The word "wearied" conveys a sense of profound fatigue, exasperation, and even emotional exhaustion. Their "iniquities" (perversity, moral evil, fault, sin, and the punishment thereof) have become an unbearable burden to God, demonstrating the profound grief, sorrow, and emotional toll that human sin takes on the divine heart, even for an omnipotent and immutable God.

Literary Devices

Isaiah 43:24 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its profound message of divine lament and human failure. Anthropomorphism is central, as God is depicted as being "made to serve" and "wearied" by human sin. This attributes human emotions, physical states (like exhaustion), and experiences (like being forced into service) to God, making His disappointment, grief, and burden profoundly relatable and impactful to the human audience. The verse also utilizes stark Contrast, juxtaposing what Israel failed to do (offer costly and sincere worship) with what they did do (burden God with their pervasive sins). This highlights the depth of their spiritual rebellion and the inversion of the covenant relationship. Furthermore, the concept of sin "making God serve" or "wearing" Him functions as a powerful Metaphor, portraying sin not merely as an abstract offense but as a tangible, heavy burden that imposes a significant toll, even on the divine. The language is also highly Emotive, designed to evoke a strong sense of divine lament, sorrow, and a clear indictment of Israel's unfaithfulness and spiritual negligence.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Isaiah 43:24 profoundly illustrates the intimate and demanding nature of God's covenant relationship with His people, revealing both His expectations for genuine, heartfelt worship and the deep, personal impact of human sin on the divine heart. It underscores that God desires not merely ritualistic observance or external compliance, but rather wholehearted devotion and obedience, symbolized by the "choicest" offerings. The anthropomorphic expression of God being "wearied" by sin is a powerful theological statement, emphasizing that sin is not a trivial matter; it grieves the Holy Spirit, burdens the Creator, and disrupts the intended harmony of the relationship. Yet, the immediate context (especially Isaiah 43:25) simultaneously showcases God's boundless grace and unwavering willingness to forgive, revealing a divine character that, despite being burdened by sin, remains committed to redemption and restoration. This profound tension between divine justice, which calls for accountability, and unwavering mercy, which offers reconciliation, is a cornerstone of biblical theology.

Reflection and Application

Isaiah 43:24 serves as a potent mirror for contemporary believers, prompting us to honestly assess the nature of our own worship, obedience, and commitment to God. Are we offering God our "sweet cane" and the "fat of our sacrifices"—that is, our best, our most valuable resources, our sincere devotion, our wholehearted obedience, and our unreserved love? Or are we, through our compromises, apathy, deliberate disobedience, or spiritual negligence, inadvertently "making God serve" and "wearying" Him with our sins? This verse powerfully reminds us that true spirituality extends far beyond mere external rituals or perfunctory duties; it demands a heart fully yielded to God, recognizing that our choices, attitudes, and actions have profound implications for our relationship with Him. The divine lament here calls us to a deeper awareness of the gravity of sin and its capacity to grieve the Holy Spirit. It challenges us to move from a performance-based or self-serving faith to one rooted in genuine love, reverence, and a desire to bring joy to God's heart rather than burdening it with our unfaithfulness.

Questions for Reflection

  1. In what specific ways might my own actions or attitudes be akin to withholding "sweet cane" or the "fat of sacrifices" from God in my worship or daily life?
  2. How does the idea of God being "wearied" by sin deepen my understanding of His holiness, His emotional capacity, and my own responsibility for my actions?
  3. What specific areas of my life might be "making God to serve" my own desires or sinful inclinations rather than truly serving and honoring Him?
  4. Given God's expressed weariness with sin in this verse, how does His immediate and unconditional promise of forgiveness in the very next verse (Isaiah 43:25) deepen my appreciation for His boundless grace and mercy?

FAQ

Does God literally get tired or exhausted by our sins?

No, God, in His infinite, immutable, and omnipotent nature, does not experience physical or emotional exhaustion as finite humans do. The language used in Isaiah 43:24 is a powerful example of anthropomorphism, a literary device that attributes human characteristics, emotions, and experiences to God to make His divine perspectives and feelings comprehensible to us. When God says He is "wearied" or "made to serve" by Israel's sins, it powerfully conveys His profound grief, disappointment, and the immense burden that human rebellion and unfaithfulness place upon His holy character. It emphasizes the extreme gravity of sin and how deeply it offends, grieves, and burdens the heart of a loving and righteous God who desires a pure and devoted relationship with His people. It is a vivid and relatable expression of divine sorrow over human unfaithfulness and spiritual neglect.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Isaiah 43:24, with its lament over Israel's pervasive failure to offer true, costly worship and their burdening of God with their relentless sin, finds its ultimate resolution and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The "sweet cane" and "fat of sacrifices" that Israel failed to provide point forward to the perfect sacrifice and worship offered by Christ. Unlike Israel, who continually withheld their best and burdened God, Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly offered Himself—the ultimate, flawless, and once-for-all sacrifice—thereby fulfilling all the requirements of the Law and establishing a new covenant (Hebrews 10:10-14). He did not burden God with sin but, rather, bore the crushing burden of our sins upon Himself on the cross (1 Peter 2:24), becoming the propitiation for our iniquities. While Israel's iniquities "wearied" God, Christ, through His atoning work, took away that weariness and the penalty of sin, offering true rest to all who are burdened by sin and heavy laden (Matthew 11:28-30). Thus, what Israel failed to do, and the profound burden they imposed, was perfectly and completely addressed by Christ, who became our perfect offering and the one who fully satisfied God's righteous demands, transforming divine weariness into divine pleasure in His beloved Son.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Isaiah 43:22–28. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 7 verses
Passage under commentIsaiah 43:22–28
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

This charge (and a high charge it is which is here exhibited against Jacob and Israel, God's professing people) comes in here, 1. To clear God's justice in bringing them into captivity, and to vindicate that. Were they not in covenant with him? Had they not his sanctuary among them? Why then did the Lord deal thus with his land? Deu 29:24. Here is a good reason given: they had neglected God and had cast him off, and therefore he justly rejected them and gave them to the curse (Isa 43:28); and they must be brought to own this before they are prepared for deliverance; and they did so, Dan 9:5; Neh 9:33. 2. To advance God's mercy in their deliverance and to make that appear more glorious. Many things are before observed to magnify the power of God in it; but this magnifies his goodness, that he should do such great and kind things for a people that had been so very provoking to him and were now suffering the just punishment of their iniquity. The pardoning of their sin was as great an instance of God's power (for so Moses reckons it, Num 14:17, etc.) as the breaking of the yoke of their captivity. Now observe here,

I.What the sins are which they are here charged with.

1.Omissions of the good which God had commanded; and this part of the charge is here much insisted upon. Observe how it comes in with a but; compare Isa 43:21, where God tells them what favours he had bestowed upon them and what his just expectations were from them. He had formed them for himself, intending they should show forth his praise. But they had not done so; they had frustrated God's expectations from them, and made very ill returns to him for his favours. For, (1.) They had cast off prayer: Thou hast not called upon me, O Jacob! Jacob was a man famous for prayer (Hos 12:4); his seed bore his name, but did not tread in his steps, and therefore are justly upbraided with it. God takes it ill when children degenerate from the virtue and devotion of their pious ancestors. To boast of the name of Jacob, and yet live without prayer, is to mock God and deceive ourselves. If Jacob does not call upon God, who will? (2.) They had grown weary of their religion: "Thou art Israel, the seed not only of a praying but of a prevailing father, that was a prince with God; and yet, not valuing his experiences any more than his example, thou hast been weary of me." They had been in relation to God, employed in his service and in communion with him; but they began to snuff at it, and to say, Behold, what a weariness is it! Note, Those who neglect to call upon God do in effect tell him they are weary of him and have a mind to change their Master. (3.) They grudged the expense of their devotion, and were niggardly and penurious in it. They were for a cheap religion; and in those acts of devotion that were costly they desired to be excused. They had not brought, no, not their small cattle, the lambs and kids, which God required for burnt-offerings (Isa 43:23), much less did they bring their greater cattle, pretending they could not spare them, they must have them for the maintenance of their families. So little sense had they of the greatness of God and their obligations to him that they could not find in their hearts to part with a lamb out of their flock for his honour, though he called for it and would graciously have accepted it. Sweet cane, or calamus, was used for the holy oil, incense, and perfume; but they were not willing to be at the charge of that, Isa 43:24. What they had must serve, though it was old and good for nothing; they would not buy fresh. Perhaps it was usual for devout pious persons to bring free-will incense as well as other free-will offerings; but they were not so generous, nor did they fill the altar of God, nor moisten it abundantly, as they should have done, with the fat of their sacrifices; what sacrifices they did bring were of the lean and refuse of their cattle, that had no fat in them to regale the altar with. (4.) What sacrifices they did offer they did not honour God with them, and so they were, in effect, as no sacrifices (Isa 43:23): Neither hast thou honoured me with thy sacrifices. Some of them offered their sacrifices to false gods; others, who offered them to the true God, were either careless in the manner of offering them or hypocritical in their intentions, so that they might be truly said not to honour God with them, but rather to dishonour him. (5.) That which aggravated their neglect of sacrificing was that, as God had appointed it, it was no burdensome thing; it was not a service that they had any reason at all to complain of: "I have not caused thee to serve with an offering; I have not made it a task and drudgery to you, whatever you, through the corruption of your natures, have made it yourselves. I have not wearied thee with incense." None of God's commandments are grievous, no, not those concerning sacrifice and incense. They were not more costly than might be afforded by those that lived in such a plentiful country, nor did their attendance on them require any more time than they could well spare. But that which especially forbade them to call it a wearisome service was that they were required to be cheerful and pleasant, and to rejoice before God in all their approaches to him, Deu 12:12. They had many feasts and good days, but only one day in all the year in which they were to afflict their souls. The ordinances of the ceremonial law, though, in comparison with Christ's easy yoke, they are spoken of as heavy (Act 15:10), yet, in comparison with the service that idolaters did to their false gods, they were light, and not to be called services nor found fault with as wearisome. God did not require them to sacrifice their children, as Moloch did.

2.Commissions of the evil which God had forbidden; and omissions commonly make way for commissions: Thou hast made me to serve with thy sins. When we make God's gifts the food and fuel for our lusts, and his providence the patron of our wicked projects, especially when we encourage ourselves to continue in sin because grace has abounded, then we make God to serve with our sins. Or it may denote what a grief and burden sin is to God; it not only wearies men and makes the creation groan, but it wearies my God also (Isa 7:13) and makes the Creator complain that he is grieved (Psa 95:10), that he is broken (Eze 6:9), that he is pressed with sinners as a cart is pressed that is full of sheaves (Amo 2:13), and to cry out, Ah! I will ease me of my adversaries, Isa 1:24. The antithesis is observable: God had not made them to serve with their sacrifices, but they had made him to serve with their sins. The master had not tired the servants with his commands, but they had tired him with their disobedience. Those are wicked servants indeed that behave so ill to so good a Master. God is tender of our comfort, but we are careless of his honour. Let this engage us to keep close to our duty, that it is easy and reasonable, and no disparagement to us, nor too hard for us.

II.What were the aggravations of their sin, Isa 43:27.

1.That they were children of disobedience; for their first father (that is, their forefathers) had sinned; and they had not only sinned in their loins, but sinned like them. Ezra confesses this: Since the days of our fathers have we been in a great trespass, Ezr 9:7. But their forefathers are called their first father to put us in mind of the apostasy and rebellion of our first father Adam, to which corrupt fountain we must trace up the streams of all our transgressions.

2.That they were scholars of disobedience too: for their teachers had transgressed against God, were guilty of gross scandalous sins, and the people, no doubt, would learn to do as they did. It is ill with a people when their leaders cause them to err, and their teachers, who should reform them, corrupt them.

III.What were the tokens of God's displeasure against them for their sins, Isa 43:23. He brought ruin both upon church and state.

1.The honour of their church was laid in the dust and trampled on: I have profaned the princes of the sanctuary, that is, the priests and Levites who presided with great dignity and power in the temple-service; they profaned themselves, and made themselves vile, by their enormities, and then God profaned them and made them vile, by their calamities and the contempt they fell into, Mal 2:9.

2.The honour of their state was ruined likewise: "I have given Jacob to the curse, that is, to be cursed, and hated, and abused by all their neighbours, and Israel to reproach, to be insulted, ridiculed, and triumphed over by their enemies." They reproached them perhaps for that in them that was good; they mocked at their sabbaths (Lam 1:7); but God gave them up to reproach, to correct them for what was amiss. Note, The dishonour which men at any time do us should humble us for the dishonour we have done to God; and we must bear it patiently because we suffer it justly, and must acknowledge that to us belongs confusion.

IV.What were the riches of God's mercy towards them notwithstanding (Isa 43:25): I even I, am he who notwithstanding all this blotteth out thy transgressions.

1.This gracious declaration of God's readiness to pardon sin comes in very strangely. The charge ran very high: Thou hast wearied me with thy iniquities, Isa 43:24. Now one would think it would follow: "I, even I, am he that will destroy thee, and burden myself no longer with care about thee." No, I, even I, am he that will forgive thee; as if the great God would teach us that forgiving injuries is the best way to make ourselves easy and to keep ourselves from being wearied with them. This comes in here to encourage them to repent, because there is forgiveness with God, and to show the freeness of divine mercy; where sin has been exceedingly sinful grace appears exceedingly gracious. Apply this,

(1.)To the forgiving of the sins of Israel as a people, in their national capacity. When God stopped the course of threatening judgments, and saved them from utter ruin, even then when he had them under severe rebukes, then he might be said to blot out their transgressions. Though he corrected them, he was reconciled to them again, and did not cut them off from being a people. This he did many a time, till they rejected Christ and his gospel, which was a sin against the remedy, and then he would forgive them no more as a nation, but utterly destroyed them.

(2.)To the forgiving of the sins of every particular believing penitent - transgressions and sins, infirmities though ever so numerous, backslidings though ever so heinous. Observe here,

[1.]How the pardon is expressed; he will blot them out, as a cloud is blotted out by the beams of the sun (Isa 44:22), as a debt is blotted out not to appear against the debtor (the book is crossed as if the debt were paid, because it is pardoned upon the payment which the surety has made), or as a sentence is blotted out when it is reversed, as the curse was blotted out with the waters of jealousy, which made it of no effect to the innocent, Num 5:23. He will not remember the sin, which intimates not only that he will remit the punishment of what is past, but that it shall be no diminution to his love for the future. When God forgives he forgets.

[2.]What is the ground and reason of the pardon. It is not for the sake of any thing in us, but for his own sake, for his mercies'-sake, his promise-sake, and especially for his Son's sake, and that he may himself be glorified in it.

[3.]How God glories in it: I, even I, am he. He glories in it as his prerogative. None can forgive sin but God only, and he will do it; it is his settled resolution. He will do it willingly and with delight; it is his pleasure; it is his honour; so he is pleased to reckon it.

2.Those words (Isa 43:26), Put me in remembrance, may be understood either (1.) As a rebuke to a proud Pharisee, that stands upon his own justification before God, and expects to find favour for his merits and not to be beholden to free grace: "If you have any thing to say in your own justification, any thing to offer for the sake of which you should be pardoned, and not for my sake, put me in remembrance of it. I will give you leave to plead your own cause with me; declare what your merits are, that you may be justified by them:" but those who are thus challenged will be speechless. Or, (2.) As a publican. Is God thus ready to pardon sin, and, when he pardons it, will he remember it no more? Let us then put him in remembrance, mention before him those sins which he has forgiven; for they must be ever before us, to humble us, though they are pardoned, Psa 51:3. Put him in remembrance of the promises he has made to penitents, and the satisfaction his Son has made for them. Plead these with him in wrestling for pardon, and declare these things, in order that thou mayest be justified freely by his grace. This is the only way, and it is a sure way, to peace. Only acknowledge thy transgression.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Three Centuries of Reception

4 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

4 quotes · AD 339–604
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 339Eusebius of CaesareaPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON ISAIAH 2:25
For there was no mention at all of such things required from you in the laws of the new covenant that I established through my servant whom I chose. But you did not offer these things to me. If it had been necessary to say such things, you still probably would have done something contrary. “In your sins is your preference” or as the other interpreters put it, “in your sins and in your unrighteous acts you called on me.”
AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Isaiah
(Verse 22, 23 and following) You did not call upon me, Jacob: you did not labor for me, Israel. You did not offer me the ram of your burnt offering, and you did not glorify me with your sacrifices. I did not make you serve in the offering, nor did I require labor from you in the burning of incense. You did not buy for me fragrant reeds with silver, and you did not satisfy me with the fat of your sacrifices. However, you served me in your sins: you provided labor for me in your iniquities. LXX: You have not now called, Jacob, nor have I made you labor, Israel. You have not brought me the sheep of your holocaust; nor have you magnified me with your sacrifices; nor have you made me serve with your offerings; nor have you bestowed upon me labor with frankincense; nor have you purchased for me with silver the sweet odor of your sacrifices; nor have you desired the fat of your victims; but you have defended yourself in your sins, and in your iniquities. The beasts of the field, dragons and ostriches praising me, you, Jacob, did not want to invoke me, nor afterwards did you labor to amend sin through repentance. But what you think you offered me as victims and sacrificed rams, know that they were not accepted by me, because they were common to me and idols. And he repeats the sense that he stated above: Why do I need the multitude of your victims, says the Lord? I am full of burnt offerings of rams, and fat of lambs, and blood of bulls and goats I do not desire. For I have not required anything precious from you, that I would make you labor in acquiring them. I have not required offerings from you, nor have I sought incense: not reed, nor incense, nor diverse kinds of pigments, with which you would intoxicate and satisfy me with their smoke. But I desired obedience, which is above sacrifice: and sacrifice, of which David says in the Psalms: Sacrifice to God is a contrite spirit: a broken and humbled heart God does not despise (Ps. 50:19), that is what I wanted, that is what I sought. But you have made me serve and labor in your sins, so that I am compelled to say: I have labored and endured; and I can no longer bear you. And through Hosea, God says the same: What shall I do to you, Ephraim? I will protect you, Israel. What shall I do? I will make you like Adam, and like Sodom. But what the Septuagint has is, I have defended you in your sins, and in your iniquities, so it can be connected to the previous statements, that it is God's labor and weariness to defend sinners.
In the section we examined and read previously, he delivered a prophecy of the covenant in Christ and the graces bestowed by him, for he said that he would “make a way in the desert and rivers in the dry land,” and because of this he would be blessed by “all the wild animals of the field.” The praise-giving is to be understood as a spiritual sacrifice and fruit of the new covenant in Christ. In the present passage, however, he tries to assure Israel that they had been redeemed from Egypt, rescued from the slavery that they endured there and freed from such intolerable labors, not so that they would offer him calves and thus secure access to him through blood and smoke—for such things are repugnant to God, and shadow rather than reality.That is why he says: “I have not called you now, O Jacob.” The word “now” ought to be understood to mean, “Not when you were offering sacrifices,” that is, “I have not called you when you were sacrificing oxen and slaughtered sheep, so that you should not think that you had been redeemed as a reward for the offerings.” Rather, it was when you were still in sin and guilty of defilement, for you had worshiped the gods of the Egyptians, that I deemed you worthy of mercy and love. So the gift is one of gentleness, and the fruit of loving-kindness is mercy, and the redemption came from love. The sheep of your burnt offering are nothing to me, he says, nor did you glorify me with your sacrifices. After all, how can that which is wholly unacceptable and offered in vain contribute to my glory? You did not serve me with your sacrifices. The one who pursues any good deed, he says, who achieves the character that leads to virtue, who bends his neck in submission to my decrees, who puts the teachings of the prophets into practice, could be said to serve the God who is over all. As for the one who fills the holy tent with incense, who offers oxen or sheep, or who performs successfully any of the other fine actions, that one will not genuinely glorify me. Such a person, in fact, has done nothing at all that pleases me. So then, service does not consist in offering sacrifice, but in being prepared to submit a tender neck, that willingly submits to his wishes. … Everywhere he rejected worship in shadows, leading them away from types, and drawing them to the justification which is in Christ, and teaching them to be refashioned according to the way of life taught by the gospel, by which alone it is possible to do what is pleasing to God, and come to truly blameless and sincere worship—that is, worship that is spiritual. For it says, “God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.”
But because sweat is usually wiped away from workers by a cloth, the labor of God can also be expressed by the name of cloth—He who indeed always remains quiet and unchangeable in Himself, yet nevertheless declares that He labors when He bears the harsh depravities of men. Whence He also says through the prophet: "I have labored in enduring." Now God appeared in the flesh, He labored from our infirmity. When unbelievers saw this labor of His passion, they refused to venerate Him. For they disdained to believe that He whom they saw mortal in the flesh was immortal in His divinity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Isaiah 43:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.