Skip to content
“Vows Regarding Social and Economic Life”· Nehemiah 10:30–31
Translation
King James Version
And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And that we would not give H5414 our daughters H1323 unto the people H5971 of the land H776, nor take H3947 their daughters H1323 for our sons H1121:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"We will not give our daughters as wives to the peoples of the land or take their daughters as wives for our sons.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
We will not give our daughters in marriage to the people of the land, and we will not take their daughters for our sons.
Ask
American Standard Version
and that we would not give our daughters unto the peoples of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and that we would not give our daughters to the peoples of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And that we would not giue our daughters to the people of the lande, neither take their daughters for our sonnes.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and that we give not our daughters to the peoples of the land, and their daughters we take not to our sons;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 12,580 of 31,102 · 40.4%

Study This Verse

Summary

Nehemiah 10:30 records a solemn and foundational vow made by the returned exiles in Jerusalem, forming a critical component of their renewed covenant with God. This specific commitment prohibited intermarriage between the Israelites and the surrounding "people of the land," signifying their profound dedication to spiritual purity, the preservation of their distinct identity as God's chosen people, and a deliberate avoidance of the idolatry and syncretism that had historically plagued their ancestors and led to the Babylonian exile.

Context

Literary Context

Nehemiah 10:30 is strategically placed within the broader narrative of spiritual revival and covenant renewal that immediately follows the successful completion of Jerusalem's walls. Chapters 8-10 detail a pivotal national assembly where Ezra, the scribe, publicly reads the Law of Moses, prompting deep conviction, confession, and worship among the people. Subsequently, the Levites lead the community in a profound prayer of confession and remembrance of God's faithfulness despite Israel's historical rebellion. This culminates in the formal sealing of a binding covenant by the leaders, priests, and Levites, outlining specific, practical commitments to obey God's commands. The vows enumerated in Nehemiah 10 address various aspects of faithfulness, including the financial support of the temple, the observance of the Sabbath, and, crucially, the avoidance of intermarriage. This particular verse is thus part of a series of concrete stipulations designed to prevent a recurrence of past failures and ensure the spiritual integrity and distinctiveness of the re-established covenant community.

Historical & Cultural Context

The setting for this vow is post-exilic Judah, approximately 444 BC, following the return of Jewish exiles from Babylonian captivity. The phrase "people of the land" (Hebrew: ‘am ha'aretz) refers to the non-Israelite inhabitants of the region—a diverse mix of Canaanite remnants, Samaritans, and other peoples who had either remained in the land during the exile or migrated there. These groups typically practiced idolatry, polytheism, and various pagan rituals, posing a constant and significant threat of spiritual contamination to the fragile, newly re-established Jewish community. Israel's history, particularly before the exile, was repeatedly marred by lapses into idolatry, often facilitated by intermarriage with foreign nations, as vividly documented in the books of Judges, Kings, and the prophets. Leaders like Ezra and Nehemiah, acutely aware of these past failures, understood that maintaining a distinct religious and cultural identity was absolutely paramount for the survival of monotheistic Yahwism in a predominantly polytheistic world. This vow was a direct response to the painful lessons of history and a proactive measure to safeguard the community's future spiritual fidelity.

Key Themes

Nehemiah 10:30 contributes significantly to several overarching themes present in the book of Nehemiah and the broader post-exilic narrative. Covenant Fidelity is central, as the verse represents a tangible, communal expression of the people's renewed commitment to God's commands, particularly those concerning holiness and separation. This echoes earlier divine injunctions found in passages like Deuteronomy 7:3-4. It powerfully highlights the theme of Spiritual Purity and Separation, emphasizing the critical need for Israel to remain distinct from the pagan influences of their neighbors to avoid syncretism and idolatry—a lesson painfully learned through the experience of exile. Furthermore, the vow underscores the Protection of Future Generations, aiming to safeguard children and descendants from being drawn away from the worship of the one true God and His covenant. This also reflects the theme of Learning from History, as the community consciously sought to avoid the catastrophic mistakes of their ancestors, whose intermarriage with foreign nations frequently led to national spiritual decline, divine judgment, and ultimately, exile, as vividly recounted in Ezra 9:1-2.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Daughters bath' from H1323

This term, derived from the root meaning "to build" (referencing the building of a family), refers to female children. In this context, "daughters" functions as a synecdoche, representing not only individual females but also the entire family line and the future generations of the Israelite community. The act of "giving" daughters in marriage signifies the initiation of a new family unit and the integration of one family into another. The prohibition thus prevents the blending of Israelite families with non-Israelite families, thereby safeguarding the religious and cultural integrity of the covenant community.

People of the Land ‘am ha'aretz' from H5971 ‘am and H776 'erets H5971

This phrase specifically designates the non-Israelite inhabitants of Canaan and surrounding territories. The term ‘am (H5971) refers to a "people" as a congregated unit or nation, while 'erets (H776) denotes the "land" or country. Unlike the returning exiles who were committed to the God of Israel, these groups typically practiced idolatry, polytheism, and various pagan customs. The use of this specific term highlights the spiritual distinction between the covenant community and those outside it, emphasizing the inherent danger of religious syncretism and spiritual compromise posed by such relationships.

Sons bên' from H1121

Similar to "daughters," "sons" here represents the male offspring and, by extension, the continuity of the family lineage and the future of the nation. The reciprocal prohibition ("nor take their daughters for our sons") emphasizes that the restriction on intermarriage was comprehensive, applying equally to both Israelite men and women. This ensured that no new family units would be formed that could compromise the community's spiritual purity, religious heritage, and unique identity as God's chosen people.

Verse Breakdown

"And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land"

This clause addresses the prohibition for Israelite women marrying non-Israelite men. In ancient patriarchal societies, women were typically "given" in marriage, meaning the fathers or male heads of households arranged these unions. This part of the vow specifically binds the Israelite community to prevent their daughters from entering into relationships that would expose them and their future offspring to pagan influences, idolatry, and a departure from the covenant with Yahweh. It underscores the community's responsibility to protect its female members from spiritual compromise.

"nor take their daughters for our sons"

This reciprocal clause prohibits Israelite men from marrying non-Israelite women. This was a particularly potent threat, as foreign wives were frequently associated with introducing foreign gods and practices into Israelite homes, leading to widespread apostasy, as tragically exemplified by King Solomon's spiritual decline due to his many foreign wives (1 Kings 11:1-8). The inclusion of both prohibitions underscores the comprehensive and absolute nature of the community's commitment to spiritual separation and the diligent protection of their religious heritage for generations to come.

Literary Devices

Nehemiah 10:30 effectively employs several literary devices to convey its significant message and underscore the gravity of the commitment. The most prominent is Antithesis or Parallelism, evident in the balanced and symmetrical structure of the two clauses: "give our daughters unto the people of the land, nor take their daughters for our sons." This precise mirroring emphasizes the comprehensive and reciprocal nature of the prohibition, covering both Israelite women marrying out and Israelite men marrying in. This parallelism underscores the absolute and communal commitment being made by the people. The verse also functions as a Pledge or Vow, a formal declaration of intent made as an integral part of a binding covenant. This is not merely a suggestion but a solemn, public promise, highlighting the gravity and non-negotiable nature of the commitment. Finally, Synecdoche is present, where "daughters" and "sons" stand in for the entire family unit and, by extension, the future generations of Israel. This emphasizes that the implications of intermarriage extend far beyond the individuals involved, impacting the spiritual well-being, identity, and destiny of the entire nation.

Theological and Thematic Connections

The prohibition against intermarriage in Nehemiah 10:30 is deeply rooted in the Old Testament concept of Israel's unique status as God's holy and chosen people. It reflects the divine imperative for separation from the idolatrous practices of surrounding nations, ensuring the purity of worship and the preservation of the covenant. This principle of spiritual distinctiveness is a recurring theme throughout biblical history, emphasizing that God's people are called to be set apart for Him, not conforming to the patterns of the world. While the specific ethnic context of Nehemiah's time is unique, the underlying theological principle of guarding against spiritual compromise in intimate relationships remains eternally relevant, particularly in the context of marriage, which is designed to be a union that fosters godliness and shared devotion to the Lord.

Reflection and Application

Nehemiah 10:30, though rooted in a specific historical and cultural context, offers profound and enduring principles for believers today. While the New Covenant does not command ethnic separation, it unequivocally calls for spiritual separation and holiness. The underlying concern of this verse—the protection of spiritual integrity and the prevention of compromise through intimate relationships—remains critically important. For Christians, this translates most directly to the principle of "unequal yoking" in marriage, as articulated in the New Testament. Marriage between a believer and an unbeliever, while not forbidden in the same ethnic terms, creates fundamental spiritual misalignment, potentially hindering spiritual growth, unity in purpose, and the ability to raise children in a consistently godly environment. This verse challenges us to consider the long-term spiritual implications of our most intimate relationships, urging us to seek partners who share our deepest convictions and commitment to Christ, thereby building a foundation that honors God and safeguards our spiritual heritage for future generations. It also prompts us to examine how we maintain spiritual distinctiveness in all areas of life, ensuring our associations do not compromise our devotion to God.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the principle of "spiritual purity" in Nehemiah 10:30 translate into practical choices for believers today, beyond just marriage?
  2. What are the potential spiritual dangers of forming close, intimate relationships with those who do not share your core faith values?
  3. In what ways can a shared commitment to Christ strengthen a marriage and family, reflecting the desire for unity seen in Nehemiah's vow?
  4. How can we, like the Israelites, learn from past mistakes (personal or historical) to make wiser choices that protect our spiritual integrity and that of future generations?

FAQ

Why was intermarriage so strictly forbidden for the Israelites in the Old Testament?

Intermarriage was strictly forbidden for the Israelites primarily to prevent spiritual apostasy and the corruption of their unique covenant relationship with God. God had chosen Israel to be a holy nation, distinct from the pagan cultures around them, to bear witness to His truth and character. Marrying outside the covenant community often led to the introduction of foreign gods, idolatrous practices, and syncretism, which directly violated the first commandment to have no other gods before the Lord. This prohibition was not based on racial prejudice but on the imperative to maintain spiritual purity and prevent the nation from being drawn away from the worship of the one true God, a lesson painfully learned through their history of spiritual decline and eventual exile. The divine command in Deuteronomy 7:3-4 explicitly states that such unions would turn their children away from following the Lord.

Does Nehemiah 10:30 apply directly to Christians today, meaning believers should not marry non-Christians?

While the specific ethnic and ceremonial laws of the Old Testament do not apply directly to New Covenant believers, the underlying spiritual principle of Nehemiah 10:30 remains profoundly relevant. The New Testament does not forbid intermarriage based on ethnicity, but it strongly cautions against believers entering into marriage with unbelievers. The apostle Paul, in 2 Corinthians 6:14, asks, "Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?" This principle applies most directly and significantly to marriage, as it is the most intimate of human relationships. A shared faith in Christ provides a foundational unity, purpose, and moral compass that is essential for a thriving, God-honoring marriage and for raising children in the faith. Therefore, while the context has changed from ethnic purity to spiritual purity, the wisdom of seeking a partner who shares your deepest spiritual commitment remains a vital biblical principle for Christians.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Nehemiah 10:30, with its emphasis on maintaining a distinct and holy people through the prohibition of intermarriage, finds its ultimate fulfillment and profound transformation in Christ. In the Old Covenant, Israel's separation was largely ethnic and ceremonial, designed primarily to preserve a pure lineage through which the Messiah would ultimately come. Christ, however, transcends and breaks down these earthly distinctions, fulfilling the Law's demands for holiness and creating a new, spiritual people—the Church—composed of believers from "every tribe and language and people and nation" (Revelation 5:9). The purity and distinctiveness sought by Nehemiah's generation are no longer achieved through physical lineage or ethnic separation, but through spiritual union with Christ. Believers are now called to be "holy and blameless before him in love" (Ephesians 1:4), not by avoiding certain ethnic groups, but by being set apart from the world's sinful values, idolatries, and practices. The Church, as the spiritual bride of Christ, is called to absolute spiritual fidelity to her Groom, avoiding "spiritual adultery" with the world's systems and idols (James 4:4). Thus, the spirit of Nehemiah 10:30 is fulfilled in the New Covenant by Christ establishing a people whose identity and purity are defined by their faith in Him, their new birth, and their spiritual separation unto Him, rather than by earthly lineage or external prohibitions. This spiritual separation enables them to live as "a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession" (1 Peter 2:9), proclaiming the excellencies of Him who called them out of darkness into His marvelous light.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Nehemiah 10:1–31. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 31 verses
Passage under commentNehemiah 10:1–31
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

When Israel was first brought into covenant with God it was done by sacrifice and the sprinkling of blood, Ex. 24. But here it was done by the more natural and common way of sealing and subscribing the written articles of the covenant, which bound them to no more than was already their duty. Now here we have,

I.The names of those public persons who, as the representatives and heads of the congregation, set their hands and seals to this covenant, because it would have been an endless piece of work for every particular person to do it; and, if these leading men did their part in pursuance of this covenant, their example would have a good influence upon all the people. Now observe,

1.Nehemiah, who was the governor, signed first, to show his forwardness in this work and to set others a good example, Neh 10:1. Those that are above others in dignity and power should go before them in the way of God.

2.Next to him subscribed twenty-two priests, among whom I wonder we do not find Ezra, who was an active man in the solemnity (Ezr 8:2) which was but the first day of the same month, and therefore we cannot think he was absent; but he, having before done his part as a scribe, now left it to others to do theirs.

3.Next to the priests, seventeen Levites subscribed this covenant, among whom we find all or most of those who were the mouth of the congregation in prayer, Ezr 9:4, Ezr 9:5. This showed that they themselves were affected with what they had said, and would not bind those burdens on others which they themselves declined to touch. Those that lead in prayer should lead in every other good work.

4.Next to the Levites, forty-four of the chief of the people gave it under their hands for themselves and all the rest, chiefly those whom they had influence upon, that they would keep God's commandments. Their names are left upon record here, to their honour, as men that were forward and active in reviving and endeavouring to perpetuate religion in their country. The memory of such shall be blessed. It is observable that most of those who were mentioned, Ezr 7:8, etc., as heads of houses or clans, are here mentioned among the first of the chief of the people that subscribed, whoever was the present head bearing the name of him that was head when they came out of Babylon, and these were fittest to subscribe for all those of their father's house. Here are Parosh, Pahathmoab, Elam, Zatthu, Bani (Neh 10:14), Azgad, Bebai, Bigvai, Adin, Ater, Hashum, Bezai, Hariph, Anathoth, and some others in the following verses, that are all found in that catalogue. Those that have interest must use it for God.

II.The concurrence of the rest of the people with them, and the rest of the priests and Levites, who signified their consent to what their chiefs did. With them joined,

1.Their wives and children; for they had transgressed, and they must reform. Every one that had knowledge and understanding must covenant with God. As soon as young people grow up to be capable of distinguishing between good and evil, and of acting intelligently, they ought to make it their own act and deed to join themselves to the Lord.

2.The proselytes of other nations, all that had separated themselves from the people of the lands, their gods and their worship, unto the law of God, and the observance of that law. See what conversion it; it is separating ourselves from the course and custom of this world, and devoting ourselves to the conduce of the word of God. And, as there is one law, so there is one covenant, one baptism, for the stranger and for him that is born in the land. Observe how the concurrence of the people is expressed, Neh 10:29.

(1.)They clave to their brethren one and all. Here those whom the court blessed the country blessed too! The commonalty agreed with their nobles in this good work. Great men never look so great as when they encourage religion, and are examples of it; and they would by that, as much as any thing, secure an interest in the most valuable of their inferiors. Let but the nobles cordially espouse religious causes, and perhaps they will find people cleave to them therein closer than they can imagine. Observe, Their nobles are called their brethren; for, in the things of God, rich and poor, high and low, meet together.

(2.)They entered into a curse and an oath. As the nobles confirmed the covenant with their hands and seals, so the people with a curse and an oath, solemnly appealing to God concerning their sincerity, and imprecating his just revenge if they dealt deceitfully. Every oath has in it a conditional curse upon the soul, which makes it a strong bond upon the soul; for our own tongues, if false and lying tongues, will fall, and fall heavily, upon ourselves.

III.The general purport of this covenant.

They laid upon themselves no other burden than this necessary thing, which they were already obliged to by all other engagements of duty, interest, and gratitude - to walk in God's law, and to do all his commandments, Neh 10:29. Thus David swore that he would keep God's righteous judgments, Psa 119:106. Our own covenant binds us to this, if not more strongly, yet more sensibly, than we were before bound, and therefore we must not think it needless thus to bind ourselves. Observe, When we bind ourselves to do the commandments of God we bind ourselves to do all his commandments, and therein to have an eye to him as the Lord and our Lord.

IV.Some of the particular articles of this covenant, such as were adapted to their present temptations.

1.That they would not intermarry with the heathen, Neh 10:30. Many of them had been guilty of this, Ezr 9:1. In our covenants with God we should engage particularly against those sins that we have been most frequently overtaken in and damaged by. Those that resolve to keep the commandments of God must say to evil doers, Depart, Psa 119:115.

2.That they would keep no markets on the sabbath day, or any other day of which the law had said, You shall do no work therein. They would not only not sell goods themselves for gain on that day, but they would not encourage the heathen to sell on that day by buying of them, no not victuals, under pretence of necessity; but would buy in their provisions for their families the day before, Neh 10:31. Note, Those that covenant to keep all God's commandments must particularly covenant to keep sabbaths well; for the profanation of them is an inlet to other instances of profaneness. The sabbath is a market day for our souls, but not for our bodies.

3.That they would not be severe in exacting their debts, but would observe the seventh year as a year of release, according to the law, Neh 10:31. In this matter they had been faulty (ch. 5), and here therefore they promise to reform. This was the acceptable fast, to undo the heavy burden, and to let the oppressed go free, Isa 58:6. It was in the close of the day of expiation that the jubilee trumpet sounded. It was for the neglect of observing the seventh year as a year of rest for the land that God had made it enjoy its sabbaths seventy years (Lev 26:35), and therefore they covenanted to observe that law. Those are stubborn children indeed that will not amend the fault for which they have been particularly corrected.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Nehemiah 10:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.