Luke 2:51
“The Boy Jesus in the Temple”Luke 2:41–52
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
- κατέβηkatebēHe went downG2597V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- μετ᾽met᾽withG3326PREPPreposition
- αὐτῶνautōnthemG846P-GPMPersonal pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- ἦλθενēlthenHe cameG2064V-2AAI-3SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- εἰςeistoG1519PREPPreposition
- ΝαζαρὲθNazarethNazarethG3478N-ASF-LNoun Accusative Singular Feminine Location
- καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
- ἦνēnHe wasG1510V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- ὑποτασσόμενοςhupotassomenossubjectG5293V-PPP-NSMVerb Present Passive Participle Nominative Singular Masculine
- αὐτοῖςautoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
- καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
- ἡhētheG3588T-NSFDefinite article Nominative Singular Feminine
- μήτηρmētērmotherG3384N-NSFNoun Nominative Singular Feminine
- αὐτοῦautouof HimG846P-GSMPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Masculine
- διετήρειdietēreiwas treasuring upG1301V-IAI-3SVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Singular
- πάνταpantaallG3956A-APNAdjective Accusative Plural Neuter
- τὰta[the]G3588T-APNDefinite article Accusative Plural Neuter
- ῥήματαrhēmatadeclarationG4487N-APNNoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- ταῦταtautatheseG3778D-APNDemonstrative pronoun Accusative Plural Neuter
- ἐνeninG1722PREPPreposition
- τῇtēatheG3588T-DSFDefinite article Dative Singular Feminine
- καρδίᾳkardiaheartG2588N-DSFNoun Dative Singular Feminine
- αὐτῆςautēsof herG846P-GSFPersonal pronoun Genitive Singular Feminine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 2:41–52. He set out his notes in a three-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have here the only passage of story recorded concerning our blessed Saviour, from his infancy to the day of his showing to Israel at twenty-nine years old, and therefore we are concerned to make much of this, for it is in vain to wish we had more. Here is,
I.Christ's going up with his parents to Jerusalem, at the feast of the passover, Luke 2:41, Luke 2:42.
1.It was their constant practice to attend there, according to the law, though it was a long journey, and they were poor, and perhaps not well able, without straitening themselves, to bear the expenses of it. Note, Public ordinances must be frequented, and we must not forsake the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is. Worldly business must give way to spiritual concerns. Joseph and Mary had a son in the house with them, that was able to teach them better than all the rabbin at Jerusalem; yet they went up thither, after the custom of the feast. The Lord loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob, and so should we. We have reason to suppose that Joseph went up likewise at the feasts of pentecost and tabernacles; for all the males were to appear there thrice a year, but Mary only at the passover, which was the greatest of the three feasts, and had most gospel in it.
2.The child Jesus, at twelve years old, went up with them. The Jewish doctors say that at twelve years old children must begin to fast from time to time, that they may learn to fast on the day of atonement; and that at thirteen years old a child begins to be a son of the commandment, that is, obliged to the duties of adult church-membership, having been from his infancy, by virtue of his circumcision, a son of the covenant. It is not said that this was the first time that Jesus went up to Jerusalem to worship at the feast: probably he had done it for some years before, having spirit and wisdom above his years; and all should attend on public worship that can hear with understanding, Nehemiah 8:2. Those children that are forward in other things should be put forward in religion. It is for the honour of Christ that children should attend on public worship, and he is pleased with their hosannas; and those children that were in their infancy dedicated to God should be called upon, when they are grown up, to come to the gospel passover, to the Lord's supper, that they make it their own act and deed to join themselves to the Lord.
II.Christ's tarrying behind his parents at Jerusalem, unknown to them, in which he designed to give an early specimen of what he was reserved for.
1.His parents did not return till they had fulfilled the days; they had staid there all the seven days at the feast, though it was not absolutely necessary that they should stay longer than the two first days, after which many went home. Note, It is good to stay to the conclusion of an ordinance, as becomes those who say, It is good to be here, and not to hasten away, as if we were like Doeg, detained before the Lord.
2.The child tarried behind in Jerusalem, not because he was loth to go home, or shy of his parents' company, but because he had business to do there, and would let his parents know that he had a Father in heaven, whom he was to be observant of more than of them; and respect to him must not be construed disrespect to them. Some conjecture that he tarried behind in the temple, for it was the custom of the pious Jews, on the morning that they were to go home, to go first to the temple, to worship God; there he staid behind, and found entertainment there till they found him again. Or, perhaps, he staid at the house where they lodged, or some other friend's house (and such a child as he was could not but be the darling of all that knew him, and every one would court his company), and went up to the temple only at church-time; but so it was that he staid behind. It is good to see young people willing to dwell in the house of the Lord; they are then like Christ.
3.His parents went the first day's journey without any suspicion that he was left behind, for they supposed him to have been in the company, Luke 2:44. On these occasions, the crowd was very great, especially the first day's journey, and the roads full of people; and they concluded that he came along with some of their neighbours, and they sought him among their kindred and acquaintance, that were upon the road, going down. Pray did you see our Son? or, Did you see him? Like the spouses's inquiry, Saw ye him whom my soul loveth? This was a jewel worth seeking after. They knew that every one would be desirous of his company, and that he would be willing to do good among his kinsfolk and acquaintance, but among them they found him not, Luke 2:45. There are many, too many, who are our kinsfolk and acquaintance, that we cannot avoid conversing with, among whom we find little or nothing of Christ. When they could not hear of him in this and the other company upon the road, yet they hoped they should meet with him at the place where they lodged that night; but there they could learn no tidings of him. Compare this with Job 23:8, Job 23:9.
4.When they found him not at their quarters at night, they turned back again, next morning, to Jerusalem, seeking him. Note, Those that would find Christ must seek till they find; for he will at length be found of those that seek him, and will be found their bountiful rewarder. Those that have lost their comforts in Christ, and the evidences of their interest in him, must bethink themselves where, and when, and how, they lost them, and must turn back again to the place where they last had them; must remember whence they are fallen, and repent, and do their first works, and return to their first love, Revelation 2:4, Revelation 2:5. Those that would recover their lost acquaintance with Christ must go to Jerusalem, the city of our solemnities, the place which he has chosen to put his name there; must attend upon him in his ordinances, in the gospel-passover, there they may hope to meet him.
5.The third day they found him in the temple, in some of the apartments belonging to the temple, where the doctors of the law kept, not their courts, but their conferences rather, or their schools for disputation; and there they found him sitting in the midst of them (Luke 2:46), not standing as a catechumen to be examined or instructed by them, for he had discovered such measures of knowledge and wisdom that they admitted him to sit among them as a fellow or member of their society. This is an instance, not only that he was filled with wisdom (Luke 2:40), but that he had both a desire to increase it and a readiness to communicate it; and herein he is an example to children and young people, who should learn of Christ to delight in the company of those they may get good by, and choose to sit in the midst of the doctors rather than in the midst of the players. Let them begin at twelve years old, and sooner, to enquire after knowledge, and to associate with those that are able to instruct them; it is a hopeful and promising presage in youth to be desirous of instruction. Many a youth at Christ's age now would have been playing with the children in the temple, but he was sitting with the doctors in the temple.
(1.)He heard them. Those that would learn must be swift to hear.
(2.)He asked them questions; whether, as a teacher (he had authority so to ask) or as a learner (he had humility so to ask) I know not, or whether as an associate, or joint-searcher after truth, which must be found out by mutual amicable disquisitions.
(3.)He returned answers to them, which were very surprising and satisfactory, Luke 2:47. And his wisdom and understanding appeared as much in the questions he asked as in the answers he gave, so that all who heard him were astonished: they never heard one so young, no indeed any of their greatest doctors, talk sense at the rate that he did; like David, he had more understanding than all his teachers, yea, than the ancients, Psalm 119:99, Psalm 119:100. Now Christ showed forth some rays of his glory, which were presently drawn in again. He gave them a taste (says Calvin) of his divine wisdom and knowledge. Methinks this public appearance of Christ in the temple, as a teacher, was like Moses's early attempt to deliver Israel, which Stephen put this construction upon, that he supposed his brethren would have understood, by that, how God by his hand would deliver them, Acts 7:24, Acts 7:25. They might have taken the hint, and been delivered then, but they understood not; so they here might have had Christ (for aught I know) to enter upon his work now, but they were only astonished, and understood not the indication; and therefore, like Moses, he retires into obscurity again, and they hear no more of him for many years after.
6.His mother talked with him privately about it. When the company broke up, she took him aside, and examined him about it with a deal of tenderness and affection, Luke 2:48. Joseph and Mary were both amazed to find him there, and to find that he had so much respect showed him as to be admitted to sit among the doctors, and to be taken notice of. His father knew he had only the name of a father, and therefore said nothing. But,
(1.)His mother told him how ill they took it: "Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? Why didst thou put us into such a fright?" They were ready to say, as Jacob of Joseph, "A wild beast has devoured him; or, He is fallen into the hands of some more cruel enemy, who has at length found out that he was the young child whose life Herod had sought some years ago." A thousand imaginations, we may suppose, they had concerning him, each more frightful than another. "Now, why hast thou given us occasion for these fears? Thy father and I have sought thee, sorrowing; not only troubled that we lost thee, but vexed at ourselves that we did not take more care of thee, to bring thee along with us." Note, Those may have leave to complain of their losses that think they have lost Christ. But their weeping did not hinder sowing; they did not sorrow and sit down in despair, but sorrowed and sought. Note, If we would find Christ, we must seek him sorrowing, sorrowing that we have lost him, that we have provoked him to withdraw, and that we have sought him no sooner. They that thus seek him in sorrow shall find him, at length, with so much the greater joy.
(2.)He gently reproved their inordinate solicitude about him (Luke 2:49): "How is it that you sought me? You might have depended upon it, I would have followed you home when I had done the business I had to do here. I could not be lost in Jerusalem. Wist ye not that I ought to be, en tois tou patros mou; - in my Father's house?" so some read it; "where else should the Son be, who abideth in the house for ever? I ought to be," [1.] "Under my Father's care and protection; and therefore you should have cast the care of me upon him, and not have burdened yourselves with it." Christ is a shaft hid in his Father's quiver, Isaiah 49:2. He takes care of his church likewise, and therefore let us never despair of its safety. [2.] "At my Father's work" (so we take it): "I must be about my Father's business, and therefore could not go home as soon as you might. Wist ye not? Have you not already perceived that concerning me, that I have devoted myself to the service of religion, and therefore must employ myself in the affairs of it?" Herein he hath left us an example; for it becomes the children of God, in conformity to Christ, to attend their heavenly Father's business, and to make all other business give way to it. This word of Christ we now think we understand very well, for he hath explained it in what he hath done and said. It was his errand into the world, and his meat and drink in the world, to do his Father's will, and finish his work: and yet at that time his parents understood not this saying, Luke 2:50. They did not understand what business he had to do then in the temple for his Father. They believed him to be the Messiah, that should have the throne of his father David; but they thought that should rather bring him to the royal palace than to the temple. They understood not his prophetical office; and he was to do much of his work in that.
Lastly, Here is their return to Nazareth. This glimpse of his glory was to be short. It was now over, and he did not urge his parents either to come and settle at Jerusalem or to settle him there (though that was the place of improvement and preferment, and where he might have the best opportunities of showing his wisdom), but very willingly retired into his obscurity at Nazareth, where for many years he was, as it were, buried alive. Doubtless, he came up to Jerusalem, to worship at the feast, three times a year, but whether he ever went again into the temple, to dispute with the doctors there, we are not told; it is not improbable but he might. But here we are told,
1.That he was subject to his parents. Though once, to show that he was more than a man, he withdrew himself from his parents, to attend his heavenly Father's business, yet he did not, as yet, make that his constant practice, nor for many years after, but was subject to them, observed their order, and went and came as they directed, and, as it should seem, worked with his father at the trade of a carpenter. Herein he hath given an example to children to be dutiful and obedient to their parents in the Lord. Being made of a woman, he was made under the law of the fifth commandment, to teach the seed of the faithful thus to approve themselves to him a faithful seed. Though his parents were poor and mean, though his father was only his supposed father, yet he was subject to them; though he was strong in spirit, and filled with wisdom nay though he was the Son of God, yet he was subject to his parents; how then will they answer it who, though foolish and weak, yet are disobedient to their parents?
2.That his mother, though she did not perfectly understand her son's sayings, yet kept them in her heart, expecting that hereafter they would be explained to her, and she should fully understand them, and know how to make use of them. However we may neglect men's sayings because they are obscure (Si non vis intelligi debes negligi - If it be not intelligible, it is not valuable), yet we must not think so of God's sayings. That which at first is dark, so that we know not what to make of it, may afterwards become plain and easy; we should therefore lay it up for hereafter. See John 2:22. We may find use for that another time which now we see not how to make useful to us. A scholar keeps those grammar rules in memory which at present he understands not the use of, because he is told that they will hereafter be of use to him; so we must do by Christ's sayings.
3.That he improved, and came on, to admiration (Luke 2:52): He increased in wisdom and stature. In the perfections of his divine nature there could be no increase; but this is meant of his human nature, his body increased in stature and bulk, he grew in the growing age; and his soul increased in wisdom, and in all the endowments of a human soul. Though the Eternal Word was united to the human soul from his conception, yet the divinity that dwelt in him manifested itself to his humanity by degrees, ad modum recipientis - in proportion to his capacity; as the faculties of his human soul grew more and more capable, the gifts it received from the divine nature were more and more communicated. And he increased in favour with God and man, that is, in all those graces that rendered him acceptable to God and man. Herein Christ accommodated himself to his estate of humiliation, that, as he condescended to be an infant, a child, a youth, so the image of God shone brighter in him, when he grew up to be a youth, than it did, or could, while he was an infant and a child. Note, Young people, as they grow in stature, should grow in wisdom, and then, as they grow in wisdom, they will grow in favour with God and man.
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
13 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
(ubi sup.) All that time of the life of Christ which He passed between His manifestation in the temple and His baptism, being devoid of any great public miracles or teaching, the Evangelist sums up in one word, saying, And he went down with them.
(ubi sup.) Sometimes by His word He first institutes laws, and He afterwards confirms them by His work, as when He says, The good shepherd layeth down his life for his sheep. (John 10:11) For shortly after seeking our salvation He poured out His own life. But sometimes He first sets forth in Himself an example, and afterwards, as far as words can go, draws therefrom rules of life, as He does here, showing forth by His work these three things above the rest, the love of God, honour to parents, but the preferring God also to our parents. For when He was blamed by His parents, He counts all other things of less moment than those which belong to God; again, He gives His obedience also to His parents.
(Amphilochius.) He increased then in age, His body growing to the stature of man; but in wisdom through those who were taught divine truths by Him; in grace, that is, whereby we are advanced with joy, trusting at last to obtain the promises; and this indeed before God, because having put on the flesh, He performed His Father's work, but before men by their conversion from the worship of idols to the knowledge of the Most High Trinity.
Or they knew not whether when He said about my Father's business, He referred to the temple, or something higher and more edifying; for every one of us who doeth good, is the seat of God the Father; but whoso is the seat of God the Father, has Christ in the midst of him.
Jesus frequently went down with His disciples, for He is not always dwelling on the mount, for they who were troubled with various diseases were not able to ascend the mount. For this reason now also He went down to them who were below. It follows: And he was subject to them, &c.
Let us then also ourselves be subject to our parents. But if our fathers are not, let us be subject to those who are our fathers. Jesus the Son of God is subject to Joseph and Mary. But I must be subject to the Bishop who has been constituted my father. It seems that Joseph knew that Jesus was greater than he, and therefore in awe moderated his authority. But let every one see, that oftentimes he who is subject is the greater. Which if they who are higher in dignity understand, they will not be clated with pride, knowing that their superior is subject to them.
Children, we should learn to be subject to our parents. The greater is subject to the lesser. Jesus understood that Joseph was greater than he in age, and therefore he gave him the honor due a parent. He gave an example to every son.… I think Joseph understood that Jesus, who was subject to him, was greater than he. He knew that the one subject to him was greater than he and, out of reverence, restrained his authority. So each one should realize that often a lesser man is put in charge of better men.
(in Const. Mon. 4.) But from His very first years being obedient to His parents, He endured all bodily labours, humbly and reverently. For since His parents were honest and just, yet at the same time poor, and ill supplied with the necessaries of life, (as the stable which administered to the holy birth bears witness,) it is plain that they continually underwent bodily fatigue in providing for their daily wants. But Jesus being obedient to them, as the Scriptures testify, even in sustaining labours, submitted Himself to a complete subjection.
He who had commanded to honour our parents, was Himself subject to them.
(Orat. in 1 Cor. 15:28.) Further, since the young have not yet perfect understanding, and have need to be led forward by those who have advanced to a more perfect state; therefore when He arrived at twelve years, He is obedient to His parents, to show that whatever is made perfect by moving forward, before that it arrives at the end profitably embraces obedience, (as leading to good.)
(Hom. 3. in Cant.) The word also increases in different degrees in those who receive it; and according to the measure of its increase a man appears either an infant, grown up, or a perfect man.
And can you wonder if He who is subject to His mother, also submits to His Father? Surely that subjection is a mark not of weakness but of filial duty. Let then the heretic so raise his head as to assert that He who is sent has need of other help; yet why should He need human help, in obeying His mother's authority? He was obedient to a handmaid, He was obedient to His pretended father, and do you wonder whether He obeyed God? Or is it a mark of duty to obey man, of weakness to obey God?
How does he who is Wisdom receive understanding? “Jesus advanced in wisdom and age and grace before God and men.” This means not so much that the Son was instructed by the Father but that his human nature was instructed by his own divinity. There is the seer’s prophecy of him who blossomed from the root of Jesse, “The spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him: a spirit of wisdom and of understanding.”
Be not therefore offended, considering perchance within thyself, How can God increase? or how can He Who gives grace to angels and to men receive fresh wisdom? Rather reflect upon the great skill wherewith we are initiated into His mystery. For the wise Evangelist did not introduce the Word in His abstract and incorporeal nature, and so say of Him that He increased in stature and wisdom and grace, but after having shewn that He was born in the flesh of a woman, and took our likeness, he then assigns to Him these human attributes, and calls Him a child, and says that He waxed in stature, as His body grow little by little, in obedience to corporeal laws. And so He is said also to have increased in wisdom, not as receiving fresh supplies of wisdom,----for God is perceived by the understanding to be entirely perfect in all things, and altogether incapable of being destitute of any attribute suitable to the Godhead:----but because God the Word gradually manifested His wisdom proportionably to the age which the body had attained.
For what is the teacher of virtue, unless he fulfil his duty to his parents? What else did He do among us, than what He wished should be done by us?
The Virgin, whether she understood or whether she could not yet understand, equally laid up all things in her heart for reflection and diligent examination. Hence it follows, And his mother laid up all these things, &c. Mark the wisest of mothers, Mary the mother of true wisdom, becomes the scholar or disciple of the Child. For she yielded to Him not as to a boy, nor as to a man, but as unto God. Further, she pondered upon both His divine words and works, so that nothing that was said or done by Him was lost upon her, but as the Word itself was before in her womb, so now she conceived the ways and words of the same, and in a manner nursed them in her heart. And while indeed she thought upon one thing at the time, another she wanted to be more clearly revealed to her; and this was her constant rule and law through her whole life. It follows, And Jesus increased in wisdom.
And his mother kept all these words in her heart. Whether what she understood, or what she could not yet understand of the words of the Gospel, she kept all in her heart to be pondered upon and diligently examined. Let us then learn the chastity of the holy virgin in all things, who, no less modest in speech than in body, kept the arguments of faith in her heart. And if she kept silent before the apostolic precepts, why do you, after the apostolic precepts, more desire to teach than to learn?
He is said to have progressed in wisdom and age and grace, because he did increase in age and by this increase in age brought more into evidence the wisdom inherent in him further. By making what is ours altogether his own, he made his own the progress of people in wisdom and grace, as well as the fulfillment of the Father’s will, which is to say, people’s knowledge of God and their salvation. Now, those who say that he progressed in wisdom and grace in the sense of receiving an increase in these are saying that the union was not made from the first instant of the flesh’s existence. Neither are they holding the hypostatic union, but, misled by the empty-headed Nestorius, they are talking falsely of a relative union and simple indwelling, “understanding neither the things they say, nor whereof they affirm.” For, if from the first instant of its existence the flesh was truly united to God the Word—rather, had existence in him and identity of person with him—how did it not enjoy perfectly all wisdom and grace? It did not share the grace, and neither did it participate by grace in the things of the Word. Rather, because the human and divine things had become proper to the one Christ by the hypostatic union, then, since the same was at once God and man, it gushed forth with the grace and the wisdom and the fullness of all good things for the world.
Not that He became wise by making progress, but that by degrees He revealed His wisdom. As it was when He disputed with the Scribes, asking them questions of their law to the astonishment of all who heard Him. You see then how He increased in wisdom, in that He became known to many, and caused them to wonder, for the showing forth of His wisdom is His increase. But mark how the Evangelist, having interpreted what it is to increase in wisdom, adds, and in stature, declaring thereby that an increase or growth in age is an increase in wisdom.
He says before God and men, because we must first please God, then man.
Continue studying Luke 2:51 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.



Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
Jesus went home to Nazareth and lived in obedience to his parents, and Mary treasured all these things in her heart.
“And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth,”
From Jerusalem back to an ordinary life in a small Galilean town.
“and was subject unto them:”
Willing obedience to his parents, kept up through the years that followed.
“but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.”
As she had done after his birth, she held on to all that happened and pondered it.
Passage studyLuke 2:41–52
The Boy Jesus in His Father’s House
Summary
Every year Mary and Joseph went up to Jerusalem for the Passover, and when Jesus was twelve he went with them. On the way home they discovered he was missing, went back, and after three days found him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions, while all who heard him were astonished at his understanding. To his mother’s anguished question he gave his first recorded words: “wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?” The saying was beyond his parents at the time. He went home with them to Nazareth and was subject to them, his mother kept all these things in her heart, and he grew in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man. This one glimpse of his boyhood shows us the Son of God, who knew God as his own Father, living a real human childhood in a faithful home.
Why the family went up to Jerusalem every year
The law of Moses commanded every man in Israel to appear before the LORD three times a year, at the feast of unleavened bread, the feast of weeks and the feast of tabernacles (Deuteronomy 16:16, Exodus 23:14–17). Passover, or Pesach, was one of these three great pilgrim feasts, with Pentecost and Tabernacles. Only the men were strictly required to go, but devout families often travelled together, and Luke tells us that Jesus’ parents went “every year”. Nazareth in Galilee lies roughly seventy to eighty miles from Jerusalem, several days’ walk each way, so the journey cost them planning, time and money every time they made it. Luke’s verb, poreúomai, is the ordinary word for travelling or making one’s way, and with “every year” it describes a settled habit of obedience.
Luke calls Mary and Joseph Jesus’ goneús, his “parents”, a word built on the same base as gínomai, “to become” or “to be born”, for those who bring a child into the world and raise him. Luke has already told us that Jesus is the Son of God, and he still names Mary and Joseph together as the parents who brought him up in a devout Jewish home.
The word páscha, which comes from Aramaic, covers the whole of the festival: the meal, the day, the feast and the sacrifices that belonged to it. Passover remembered the night the LORD brought Israel out of slavery in Egypt, when the blood of a lamb marked the houses of his people (Exodus 12). The law also made it a feast for teaching children. When they asked, “What mean ye by this service?”, their parents were to answer, “It is the sacrifice of the LORD’s passover, who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt” (Exodus 12:26–27). Mary and Joseph’s yearly journey was this same handing on of faith from one generation to the next.
Luke says the family “went up” to Jerusalem. The city stands in the hills, so travellers always climbed to reach it, and going up to the holy city for worship carried a weight of its own. They went “after the custom of the feast”, and the word for custom, éthos, means an established habit or practice. Their journey was the expected practice of devout families, shared with the whole community of Israel.
Paul says that God sent forth his Son, “made of a woman, made under the law” (Galatians 4:4). Here we see that in practice, as the Son of God grows up in a household that keeps the law, among the customs of his own people. He later said that he came to fulfil the law and the prophets (Matthew 5:17), and his life carried Israel’s story forward to the fulfilment of its promises.
The Passover and the Lamb of God
The feast this family kept each year pointed to the boy who travelled with them. John the Baptist would one day see Jesus coming and say, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Jesus would come up to Jerusalem at Passover again as a man, and at the Passover meal he would give his disciples the cup as “the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20). The deliverance from Egypt that Mary and Joseph remembered each year was a picture of the greater deliverance from sin and death that he would bring by his own sacrifice, as the true Passover Lamb.
Why Luke tells us Jesus was twelve
Luke dates the visit precisely: “when he was twelve years old”. His verb, gínomai, means to become or come to be, and it fits a boy who had reached that age through the real years of a human childhood. The number itself, dṓdeka, is a weighty one in Scripture, with the twelve tribes of Israel and the twelve apostles, but here it marks a stage of life.
In Jewish custom twelve was the threshold of religious maturity, the age at which a boy began to take more personal responsibility for keeping the commandments of the law. Later Judaism set this at thirteen and marked it with the bar mitzvah, when a boy becomes a “son of the commandment”, and that ceremony took its formal shape after Jesus’ day. The idea of a boy coming of age under the law was already there, though, and Jesus came to the temple at that threshold. A visit to Jerusalem and its temple at such an age was a formative time in a boy’s life.
Luke has just told us that “the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him” (Luke 2:40). He ends this account with a sentence very like it in verse 52, and the scene in the temple, set between the two, shows that wisdom at work. It is the only event the Gospels record from the years between Jesus’ infancy and the start of his ministry.
How Jesus came to be left behind
When the family “had fulfilled the days”, they had stayed for the whole feast, which with the days of unleavened bread ran for seven days. The verb teleióō means to complete or bring to its end, so everything the feast required of them had been done before they set out for home.
Then “the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem”. The verb hypoménō means to stay behind or remain, and it can also mean to endure or hold firm. Luke reports only that he stayed, and he leaves the reason for the boy’s own words in the temple. “Joseph and his mother knew not of it” pairs ginṓskō, the common verb for knowing, with the negative ou, so they were wholly unaware.
Pilgrims travelled to the feasts in large companies of relatives, friends and neighbours, for safety and companionship on the road. Luke’s word for such a company, synodía, joins syn, “with”, and hodos, “way”, and means fellow travellers on a journey, a caravan. In a group like that, a twelve-year-old nearing manhood could move freely from one family to another, and his parents went on “supposing him to have been in the company”. The verb nomízō comes from nomos, “law” or “custom”, and means to reckon a thing by what is usual. Their assumption was a reasonable one in that setting.
“A day’s journey” meant walking from dawn to dusk, perhaps fifteen to thirty miles. Most likely it was when the company stopped for the night and families gathered that Jesus was missed. They looked first “among their kinsfolk and acquaintance”, that is, among their relatives (syngenḗs) and the people they knew well (gnōstós, “well known”, from ginōskō, “to know”). The search reached beyond their own family to everyone they knew in the company.
“And when they found him not” joins heurískō, “to find”, to the negative mḗ, and then they “turned back again to Jerusalem”. The verb hypostréphō means to turn back or return, and here it meant giving up the road home and walking the whole day’s distance again. They went “seeking him”, and zētéō is the word for an earnest and persistent search. Mary uses the same verb in verse 48 when she says “thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing”. Jerusalem was crowded with pilgrims at the feast, which made finding one boy there a daunting task.
Did Jesus do wrong by staying behind?
It is fair to ask whether a boy who caused his parents three days of anguish acted rightly. Jesus answers it himself in verse 49. He stayed because he belonged in his Father’s house, and he expected his parents to know where to find him. Scripture says that he was “in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15), and Jesus said of his Father, “I do always those things that please him” (John 8:29). His staying behind was devotion to his Father’s will, already at twelve, and Luke immediately adds that he went home with his parents and was subject to them. Mary and Joseph’s distress was real and understandable, and it came from a purpose of God they were yet to grasp. Even the most devoted parents can lose track of a child in a crowd, and Luke tells it plainly, without blame on either side.
Found in the temple among the teachers
“After three days they found him in the temple.” The word for temple here, hierón, means the whole sacred precinct, with its courts and porticoes, as distinct from the naos, the sanctuary itself. The outer courts were where teachers of the law gathered to teach and discuss, so this was the natural place for such a conversation, at the very centre of Israel’s worship and learning.
The KJV’s “doctors” translates didáskalos, from the verb “to teach”, which means teachers or masters. These were the scribes and experts in the law of Moses and its traditions, the most learned men of the nation. A devout boy listening to them in the temple courts was an ordinary sight. What astonished everyone was this boy’s understanding.
Jesus was “sitting in the midst” of them, “both hearing them, and asking them questions”. The verb for hearing, akoúō, covers listening attentively and understanding what is heard, and the verb for asking, eperōtáō, means to inquire or question. He listened and he questioned, as a learner does, and the questions themselves showed how deeply he understood.
It is hard to read of a son lost for three days and found in his Father’s house without thinking of the three days before the resurrection. Luke leaves that connection unspoken, so it is best held lightly.
The wisdom that astonished the teachers
“All that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.” The hearers take in the teachers and very likely the other pilgrims and onlookers in the courts as well. The verb exístēmi comes from ek, “out of”, and hístēmi, “to stand”, and means to be put out of one’s wits, so amazed as to be beside oneself. It is a strong word for overwhelming wonder.
They marvelled at his sýnesis, “understanding”, a noun from syníēmi, “to bring together”. It means the kind of insight that puts truths together and sees how they connect, a grasp of the things of God that goes far beyond memorised facts. They marvelled too at his apókrisis, “answers”, from apokrínomai, “to answer”. The plural shows a real exchange, in which he asked the teachers questions and also answered theirs.
This is the wisdom Isaiah foretold for the Messiah: “the spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding”, and he “shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the LORD” (Isaiah 11:2–3). All such wisdom comes from God, for “the LORD giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding” (Proverbs 2:6). The same astonishment followed Jesus all through his ministry. “The people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes” (Matthew 7:28–29). The Jews marvelled, saying, “How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?” (John 7:15), and the officers sent to take him came back saying, “Never man spake like this man” (John 7:46).
The source of such understanding is who Jesus is. He is the Word who was with God in the beginning and by whom all things were made (John 1:1–5), the one “in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:2–3), and “Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God” (1 Corinthians 1:24). The boy in the temple courts was the wisdom of God in human flesh, and yet, as verse 52 tells us, he still grew.
Mary’s question
“When they saw him, they were amazed.” The verb ekplḗssō means to be struck with astonishment, and their amazement was relief and awe at once. Their lost son was safe, and he was holding his own among the teachers of Israel.
Mary speaks for both of them. She begins tenderly with “Son”, and her question is direct: “why hast thou thus dealt with us?” It is a mother’s bewildered hurt, with a gentle reproach in it, because his absence had cost them so much. “Behold” (idoú) calls him to look at what it has meant for them, and “thy father and I” shows that Joseph, as the father of the household, shared the search and the fear. Her last word, “sorrowing”, translates odynáō, a verb for being in pain or anguish. For three days they had searched (zētéō again) in real distress.
When Mary says “thy father”, she means Joseph. Jesus’ answer turns on that word, for in the next breath he speaks of “my Father”, and he means God.
Jesus’ first words about his Father
These are the first words of Jesus recorded in the Gospels, and they are two questions: “How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?” He is gently surprised that they searched at all, since to him the place to find him was plain.
“Wist” is the old English for “knew”, and it translates eídō, a verb that means to see and so to know. His question implies that his parents, after all that had been revealed to them about him, had good reason to know where he would be. “Must” translates deî, “it is necessary”, the language of a binding obligation. Jesus stayed because there was something he had to do, a necessity that came from who he is and what he came to do.
“My Father’s” is patḗr, “father”, with moû, “my”. This is the earliest recorded time Jesus calls God his Father, and he speaks of God as his own Father in a way that belongs to him alone. Mary had said “thy father”, meaning Joseph, and Jesus gently and plainly names who his Father is.
The Greek behind “about my Father’s business” is en tois tou patros mou, literally “in the things of my Father”. The phrase can mean his Father’s house or his Father’s affairs, and faithful translations render it both ways. The KJV has “about my Father’s business”, and many modern versions have “in my Father’s house”. Both are true of this moment, because he was in the temple, his Father’s house, and he was about his Father’s work. The words reach beyond the temple to the whole of his mission, to reveal the Father, to do his will and to accomplish the work of redemption.
He spoke the same way all his life. “My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work,” he told his disciples (John 4:34). “The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do” (John 5:19). “For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me” (John 6:38). Hebrews gives his words as he comes into the world: “Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God” (Hebrews 10:7). The obedience he spoke of at twelve he carried through to the cross, where he said, “It is finished” (John 19:30). The Word who was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14) came to declare the Father (John 1:18), and at twelve he already knows it.
The temple remained his Father’s house in his eyes. When he drove out the traders he said, “make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise” (John 2:16), and in Matthew he says, “My house shall be called the house of prayer” (Matthew 21:12–13). He also spoke of the temple of his body, which would be destroyed and raised up in three days (John 2:19–21), so that he himself became the place where God dwells among his people.
Did Jesus put his Father ahead of his family?
He did, and he always would. His first loyalty belonged to his Father, and he later called his disciples to put him before even father and mother (Luke 14:26) and to “seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness” (Matthew 6:33). At the wedding in Cana he answered his mother, “Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come” (John 2:4), and during his ministry those closest to him once went out to lay hold on him, saying, “He is beside himself” (Mark 3:21). Yet in this very scene he goes straight home and obeys his parents. In him, putting God first and honouring father and mother belong together.
Why the saying was beyond Mary and Joseph
“And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.” The verb syníēmi means to put together, to grasp with the mind. They heard every word, and only later could they put it together with what they knew of him. The “saying” is rhēma, a particular spoken word, here the words of verse 49 about his Father. “Spake” is laléō, to talk or utter words.
This can be surprising, since Mary had heard the angel’s message (Luke 1:26–38), Joseph had been told in a dream (Matthew 1:18–25), and both had heard the shepherds, Simeon and Anna. They knew he was the promised Son. What his Sonship meant, and how his mission would unfold, came to them gradually, as it did to everyone around him. The LORD says, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways” (Isaiah 55:8–9). The disciples, too, “understood not that saying, and were afraid to ask him” when he foretold his death (Mark 9:32), and later “this saying was hid from them” (Luke 18:34). Their puzzlement was a first sign of how hard his own people would find him to understand, for John says, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10–11). Full understanding came after his death and resurrection, when the Holy Spirit taught his followers all things and brought his words to their remembrance (John 14:26), and guided them into all truth (John 16:13).
Was this a failure on their part?
It was no failure. Mary and Joseph were faithful and chosen by God, and what Jesus spoke of was greater than anyone could take in at once. Mary’s response in the next verse shows the right way to hold a word from God that is beyond us. She kept it and pondered it, and waited for God to make it plain.
Subject to his parents in Nazareth
“He went down with them, and came to Nazareth.” From the hills of Judea the road to Galilee goes down, and the boy who had astonished the teachers of Israel went back to an ordinary home in a small town. Nazareth was obscure enough that Nathanael asked, “Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?” (John 1:46).
There he “was subject unto them”. The verb hypotássō means to place under, and it describes a willing submission to rightful authority. The one who had just called God his Father freely put himself under the care and direction of Mary and Joseph. In doing so he kept the commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother” (Exodus 20:12), as one “made under the law” (Galatians 4:4). His submission was humility and strength in one, and it began the obedience that ran through his whole life.
Paul describes where that obedience led. Christ “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant”, and “became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:5–8, 2:7–8). Hebrews says, “Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered” (Hebrews 5:8), and Jesus said that “the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45).
Luke’s next glimpse of Jesus comes when he begins his ministry at about thirty years of age (Luke 3:23), some eighteen years later. Those hidden years in Nazareth, spent growing up, learning a trade as young men of his day did, and taking his place in family and town, were part of God’s plan and timing as surely as the years of ministry.
Mary kept these sayings in her heart
“But his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.” The verb diatēréō means to watch over thoroughly, to guard carefully, so Mary held on to these words and turned them over. The word for “sayings”, rhēma, can take in the events as well as the words, everything she had seen and heard. The heart, kardía, is in Scripture the centre of the whole person, mind, will and feelings together, so she pondered these things in the depths of her being and let them shape her faith.
Luke said the same of her after the shepherds came: “But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart” (Luke 2:19). Hers is the faith of the psalmist who says, “Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee” (Psalm 119:11). As she watched her Son grow up, she was a faithful witness to the mystery of who he is.
How Jesus grew in wisdom and stature
“And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.” The verb for increased, prokóptō, pictures driving or cutting one’s way forward, and so means to advance or make progress. It describes steady, continuing growth.
Luke names four ways he grew. In wisdom, sophia, he grew in practical understanding and discernment, in knowing how to apply truth, and this deepened with the years. Wisdom in Israel was rooted in God’s law, for “the fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). In stature, hēlikía, he grew in body. The word can mean age as well as height, and here it refers mainly to his growth from a boy into a man, with a body as truly human as ours. In favour, cháris, the word often translated grace, he grew in God’s approval and delight, and in the goodwill and respect of the people of Nazareth, who watched him grow up among them.
The verse echoes what Scripture says of the boy Samuel: “And the child Samuel grew on, and was in favour both with the LORD, and also with men” (1 Samuel 2:26). Proverbs promises the same favour to those who hold to mercy and truth: “So shalt thou find favour and good understanding in the sight of God and man” (Proverbs 3:3–4). The Father’s favour on his Son was spoken aloud at his baptism, “Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased” (Luke 3:22), and again on the mountain, “This is my beloved Son: hear him” (Luke 9:35).
Did Jesus really grow in wisdom if he is God?
He did. Jesus is fully God and fully man, one person with two natures, and in becoming man he took a true human mind as well as a human body. As a man he learned, understood and gained insight step by step, as we do, while his divine nature remained unchanged. This union of the two natures in the one person of Christ is called the hypostatic union. Luke 2:52 guards us against the old error, called Docetism, that Christ only appeared to be human. He shared our growing up as well as our flesh, and so he is a high priest who can “be touched with the feeling of our infirmities” (Hebrews 4:15). Paul speaks of believers coming “unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:13), and the one who grew perfectly in every way is the pattern for our own growth.
Seeking him and keeping his sayings
Jesus grew up in a home where the worship of God was a yearly, costly habit, and where parents brought their children to the feasts and explained them. Faith is still handed on that way, through steady worship together and through parents who answer their children’s questions about the things of God.
Mary and Joseph travelled a whole day assuming Jesus was somewhere in the company. It is easy for us, too, to take his presence for granted amid busy days and even amid religious routine. When they realised he was missing, they turned back and searched until they found him. The LORD promises, “And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart” (Jeremiah 29:13), and Jesus says, “seek, and ye shall find” (Matthew 7:7). The psalmist prays, “With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander from thy commandments” (Psalm 119:10). Behind all our seeking is his own. The parables of Luke 15 tell of a shepherd and a woman who search until they find what was lost (Luke 15:8–10), and Jesus says, “For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10).
When God’s ways are beyond you, you can do what Mary did: keep his word, ponder it, and wait for him to make it plain. The hidden years in Nazareth also give worth to quiet seasons. Most of the earthly life of the Son of God was spent in an ordinary town, obeying his parents and growing, and through those years he grew in favour with God and man.
Luke 2:41
“Now his parents”
Mary and Joseph together, the ones who raised him, named as his parents even though Luke has told us he is the Son of God.
“went to Jerusalem every year”
A long, demanding journey from Nazareth, made year after year out of obedience to the law.
“at the feast of the passover.”
The feast of Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, which Jesus himself would fulfil as the Lamb of God.
Luke 2:42
“And when he was twelve years old,”
The age at which a Jewish boy began to take the law on himself. This is the only event recorded between Jesus’ infancy and his ministry.
“they went up to Jerusalem”
Up into the hills to the holy city, the whole family together.
“after the custom of the feast.”
As devout families always did, the feast here being the Passover of verse 41.
Luke 2:43
“And when they had fulfilled the days,”
They stayed until the feast was complete.
“as they returned,”
Joseph, Mary and their company set out for Nazareth among the crowds leaving the city.
“the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem;”
He stayed on in the city, and the reason comes out in his own words in verse 49. It is the first time we see him act apart from his parents.
“and Joseph and his mother knew not of it.”
In so large a company this was easy, and they had every reason to think he was nearby.
Luke 2:44
“But they, supposing him to have been in the company,”
A natural assumption, given how such caravans travelled.
“went a day’s journey;”
A full day on the road, which put them far from Jerusalem before they missed him.
“and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance.”
Their first, sensible search was among the people they knew, family and friends alike.
Luke 2:45
“And when they found him not,”
Their easy assumption gave way to alarm.
“they turned back again to Jerusalem,”
They gave up the journey home and retraced the road.
“seeking him.”
Finding him was now their one purpose.
Luke 2:46
“And it came to pass, that after three days”
Three days of searching and fear for his parents.
“they found him in the temple,”
In the temple courts, his Father’s house, where he would tell them they should have looked first.
“sitting in the midst of the doctors,”
Among the teachers of the law, taking his part in their discussion.
“both hearing them, and asking them questions.”
He listened and questioned like a learner, and his questions showed a deep understanding.
Luke 2:47
“And all that heard him”
Everyone present, teachers and onlookers alike.
“were astonished”
Amazed to the point of being beside themselves.
“at his understanding and answers.”
His grasp of the things of God and the replies he gave to their questions, the same wisdom that would amaze the crowds in his ministry.
Luke 2:48
“And when they saw him, they were amazed:”
Relief at finding him safe, mixed with wonder at where they found him.
“and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us?”
Mary speaks for both, tenderly and directly, out of a mother’s hurt.
“behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.”
Joseph shared the anguish. “Thy father” sets up Jesus’ answer about “my Father”.
Luke 2:49
“And he said unto them,”
His first recorded words, spoken to both his parents.
“How is it that ye sought me?”
A gentle question about their search, with a mild rebuke in it.
“wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business?”
“Wist” means knew. He names God as his own Father, and his Father’s house and work as where he must be.
Luke 2:50
“And they understood not”
The meaning was beyond them for now, though they heard every word.
“the saying which he spake unto them.”
His words about his Father, which Mary would treasure until their meaning became clear.
Luke 2:51 This verse
“And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth,”
From Jerusalem back to an ordinary life in a small Galilean town.
“and was subject unto them:”
Willing obedience to his parents, kept up through the years that followed.
“but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.”
As she had done after his birth, she held on to all that happened and pondered it.
Luke 2:52
“And Jesus increased in wisdom”
Real growth in understanding, steady and continuing.
“and stature,”
Growth in body and in years, from a boy into a man.
“and in favour with God”
The Father’s approval, later spoken aloud at his baptism.
“and man.”
The goodwill and respect of the people of Nazareth who knew him.
Last revised