- English
- King James KJV
- Complete Jewish CJB
- World English WEBM
- Berean Standard BSB
- American Standard ASV
- Geneva GNV
- Young's Literal YLT
- Douay-Rheims DRC
- International
- Shqip ALB
- العربية SVD
- বাংলা BN-IRV
- မြန်မာ Judson
- 简体文 CUV-S
- 繁體中文 CUV-T
- Čeština BKR
- Nederlands STVE
- Français LSG
- Deutsch SCH
- Ελληνικά Vamvas
- ગુજરાતી GU-IRV
- Hausa HCB
- עברית Hebrew
- हिन्दी HCV
- Magyar KAROLI
- Bahasa Indonesia INDO-TB
- Italiano Diodati
- 日本語 Kougo
- 한국어 Korean
- മലയാളം MAL
- मराठी MRCV
- Norsk DNB
- فارسی OPV
- Polski BG
- Português Almeida
- Română Cornilescu
- Русский Synodal
- Español RVG
- Kiswahili Neno
- Svenska SV1917
- Tagalog TAG-ADB
- தமிழ் TCV
- తెలుగు TSA
- ภาษาไทย THAI-KJV
- Українська Ohienko
- Tiếng Việt CADMAN
- Yorùbá YCB
See on the biblical-era map


Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Genesis 5:25–27.
Concerning Methuselah observe, 1. The signification of his name, which some think was prophetical, his father Enoch being a prophet. Methuselah signifies, he dies, or there is a dart, or, a sending forth, namely, of the deluge, which came the very year that Methuselah died. If indeed his name was so intended and so explained, it was fair warning to a careless world, a long time before the judgment came. However, this is observable, that the longest liver that ever was carried death in his name, that he might be reminded of its coming surely, though it came slowly. 2. His age: he lived nine hundred and sixty-nine years, the longest we read of that ever any man lived on earth; and yet he died. The longest liver must die at last. Neither youth nor age will discharge from that war, for that is the end of all men: none can challenge life by long prescription, nor make that a plea against the arrests of death. It is commonly supposed that Methuselah died a little before the flood; the Jewish writers say, "seven days before," referring to Gen 7:10, and that he was taken away from the evil to come, which goes upon this presumption, which is generally received, that all the patriarchs mentioned in this chapter were holy good men. I am loth to offer any surmise to the contrary; and yet I see not that this can be any more inferred from their enrollment here among the ancestors of Christ than that all those kings of Judah were so whose names are recorded in his genealogy, many of whom, we are sure, were much otherwise: and, if this be questioned, it may be suggested as probable that Methuselah was himself drowned with the rest of the world; for it is certain that he died that year.
Historical interpretation
Three Centuries of Reception
5 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
(Verse 25.) And Methuselah lived for 167 years and begot Lamech. And Methuselah lived, after he begot Lamech, for 802 years, and he begot sons and daughters. And all the days of Methuselah, that he lived, were 969 years, and he died. The famous question, and the subject of dispute among all the churches, is that, according to careful calculation, Methuselah is said to have lived fourteen years after the flood. For when Methuselah was sixty-seven years old, he begot Lamech. And again, Lamech, when he was eighty-eight years old, begot Noah. And they lived together until the day of Noah's birth, which was three hundred and fifty-five years after Methuselah's birth. But in the six hundredth year of Noah's life, the flood occurred. And by this calculation, it is proven that the flood happened in the nine hundred and fifty-fifth year of Methuselah's life. However, since he is said to have lived for more than 969 years, there is no doubt that he lived for 14 years after the flood. And how is it true that only eight souls were saved in the ark? Therefore, it remains that just as there is an error in number in many things, there is also an error in this. For in both the Hebrew and Samaritan books, I found it written: And Methuselah lived 187 years and fathered Lamech. And Methuselah lived, after he begot Lamech, seven hundred eighty-two years and begot sons and daughters. And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty-nine years, and he died. And Lamech lived one hundred eighty-two years and begot Noah. From the day of the birth of Methuselah to the day of the birth of Noah, there are three hundred sixty-nine years. Add to these six hundred years of Noah's life: because in the six hundredth year of his life the deluge occurred: and so it happens that in the nine hundred and sixty-ninth year of his life Methuselah died, in that year when the deluge began.
There is a famous question that has been aired by discussion in all churches: that by a careful reckoning it can be shown that Methuselah lived fourteen years after the flood. It appears that in this case as in many others, in the Septuagint translation of the Bible there is an error in the numbers. Among the Hebrews and the books of the Samaritans, I have found the text written thus: “Methuselah lived a hundred and eighty-seven years and became the father of Lamech. Methuselah lived after the birth of Lamech seven hundred and eighty-two years and had other sons and daughters. Thus all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred and sixty-nine years; and he died. And Lamech lived one hundred and eighty two years and begot Noah.” Accordingly, there are 369 years from the day of Methuselah’s birth to the day of Noah’s birth; to these add Noah’s six hundred years, since the flood occurred in the six hundredth year of his life, and so it works out that Methuselah died in the nine hundred sixty-ninth year of his life, in the same year when the flood began.
Moreover the difference in numbers that we find between the Hebrew text and our own constitutes no disagreement about this longevity of the ancients. If any discrepancy is such that the two versions cannot both be true, we must seek the authentic account of events in the language from which our text was translated. Though this opportunity is universally available to those who wish to take it, yet, significantly enough, no one has ventured to correct the Septuagint version from the Hebrew text in the very many places where it seems to offer something different. The reason is that those differences were not considered falsifications, nor do I think that they should be so regarded in any way. Rather, where no error by the copyist is ascertained and where the sense would be harmonious with the truth and would proclaim the truth, we should believe that they were moved by the Holy Spirit to say something differently, not as part of the service that they did as translators but as exercising the freedom that they enjoyed as prophets.
Adam lived for one hundred and thirty years, and he begot a son in his own likeness and image, and he named him Seth. Adam indeed was created in the likeness and image of God, because he was made immortal in both soul and body. However, after he corrupted the image and likeness of God in himself by sinning, he begot a son in his own likeness and image, that is, mortal, corruptible, capable of reason, bound by the guilt of his transgression, and to be freed only by the grace of his Creator. It should be noted that where our Codices, translated from the Hebrew source, say Adam lived for one hundred and thirty years and begot Seth, the ancient translation has, instead of one hundred and thirty, two hundred and thirty; where our Codices continue, "And the days of Adam after he begot Seth were eight hundred years, and he begot sons and daughters," that one has seven hundred instead of eight hundred. And where it concludes, "And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years, and he died," it places the same total, and such a distinction of numbers is preserved in all generations up to the flood between the two editions, so that before the birth of a son each one in the Septuagint is said to have had one hundred years more, and after the birth one hundred years less than in the Hebrew truth. But in the conclusion, both editions place an equal number; except only in the sixth generation; where in both Codices, Jared is found to have begotten Enoch at one hundred and sixty-two years, and after his birth to have lived eight hundred years: and in the ninth, where, according to the Hebrew truth, Lamech begot Noah when he was one hundred and eighty years old, and after he was born, he is found to have survived for five hundred and ninety-five years. However, in the Septuagint, the years before Noah was born are found to be one hundred and eighty-eight, and after he was born, five hundred sixty-five; thus it happens that Lamech is found to have lived twenty-four years longer in Hebrew than in the Septuagint Codices: by which difference of interpretations, it is made that the lifetime of Methuselah seems to extend fourteen years beyond the flood, and so the years before the flood according to the Hebrews are one thousand five hundred and fifty-six; according to the Septuagint, which the chronographers follow, two thousand two hundred and forty-two: although the most learned Augustine professes that even in the Septuagint translation, Methuselah is found in fewer but more accurate Codices to have died six years before the flood: who, when he most diligently investigated the cause of the aforementioned discord in interpretations, and did not wish to derogate from the faith of the Septuagint translators, whom the apostles and evangelists are proven to have followed in many places; and he himself believed they used more a prophetic gift than the office of interpretation in translating the Scriptures; he concluded in this way, saying: "Therefore it is more credible for someone to say that when these first began to be copied from the library of Ptolemy; at that time, something like this could have happened in one Codex, but first copied from there, from which it spread more widely, where indeed the error of the scribe could have happened. However, it is not absurd to suspect this in that question about the life of Methuselah." And after some: "I would not doubt at all that it is rightly done, he says, when something different is found in both Codices, since both cannot be according to the faith of the transactions, that the truth be believed rather to the language from which it is translated into another by interpreters." Therefore, according to Hebrew truth, Adam lived one hundred and thirty years and begot Seth. Seth lived one hundred and five years and begot Enos. Enos lived ninety years and begot Cainan. Cainan lived eighty years and begot Mahalalel. Mahalalel lived sixty-five years and begot Jared. Jared lived one hundred and sixty-two years and begot Enoch.
Methuselah also lived one hundred eighty-seven years, and begot Lamech. Lamech lived one hundred eighty-two years, and begot Noah, saying: "He will comfort us from our works and labors of our hands on the earth which the Lord has cursed." Lamech foresaw in prophetic spirit what kind of person his son would be, of what great virtue he would be, and that in his days the nation of the impious would be exterminated, and that through him, after the flood, the generation of the faithful would be restored. But the works and labors of the hands, which he said, I believe he wanted not to be understood as anything other than those by which the progeny of the elect were oppressed at that time by the wickedness of the evil; he declared that his and their consolation, when the world, which was then lost by the flood, all things of the world and its inhabitants being removed from the midst, would foresee a new race of the just to be born. For even at this time, the consolation of the good is when they see the approaching day of judgment with the ruins of the world increasing, in which, the entirety of the wicked being consumed, they themselves will possess with the Lord the new kingdoms of the future age. But for what our edition has as "he will comfort," the ancient interpreters said: "He will make us rest from our works," which seems to fit the name Noah better. For Noah indeed means Rest. In which, according to the letter, it can be understood that in his times all past works of men rested through the flood. According to the spiritual sense, however, the same rest is which is also the consolation of the saints, namely to behold, with the end of the world approaching, both the destruction of the impious, and their own time of rewards at hand. But Noah, in whose merits a rest and consolation was to be given to the world by the Lord devoutly, is born in the tenth generation from Adam: because clearly, through the fulfillment of the Decalogue of the law, eternal rest and life are granted to us. When Scripture says he begot him well, it by no means wished to name his one son, lest in a perfect man the number eleven, as if a transgression of ten, should appear to have any place, but speaking mystically about a man of virtue, it reports that three sons were born to him together.
Continue studying Genesis 5:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Genesis 5:25 meticulously records Methuselah's age of 187 years at the birth of his son, Lamech, serving as a vital link in the antediluvian genealogy from Adam to Noah. This seemingly simple entry underscores God's sovereign preservation of a chosen lineage and introduces a figure whose extraordinary longevity and prophetically significant name silently bore witness to divine patience before the impending judgment of the Great Flood.
Context
Literary Context
This verse is precisely positioned within Genesis 5, a pivotal genealogical record often referred to as the "Book of the Generations of Adam." This chapter systematically traces the lineage from Adam through Seth, providing precise ages at the birth of their first sons, their subsequent years, and their eventual deaths. Genesis 5:25 specifically details Methuselah's age at Lamech's birth, continuing the unbroken chain that builds towards the narrative of Noah and the Flood, directly following the account of Enoch's unique walk with God. The meticulous nature of these genealogies emphasizes the historical reality and continuity of the pre-Flood world, laying the groundwork for the subsequent narratives of human depravity and divine judgment.
Historical & Cultural Context
The antediluvian period, prior to the Great Flood, is characterized by exceptionally long lifespans, a phenomenon that sets this era apart from all subsequent human history. While the precise reasons for this longevity are debated, it likely reflects a different set of environmental conditions and perhaps a more direct divine sustenance or genetic integrity. Culturally, these genealogies were crucial for establishing identity, lineage, and tribal relationships in ancient Near Eastern societies. The detailed recording of ages at the birth of the first son was a common practice, highlighting the importance of male progeny for the continuation of family lines. The broader context of Genesis 4-6 reveals a rapidly deteriorating moral landscape, where human wickedness was increasing on the earth, leading to God's profound grief and eventual decision to bring the Flood, as described in Genesis 6:5-7.
Key Themes
Genesis 5:25 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights Divine Patience and Longsuffering, as Methuselah's extraordinary lifespan, traditionally linked to the timing of the Flood, symbolizes God's extended grace before judgment. Secondly, the verse underscores God's Sovereign Preservation of a Chosen Lineage, demonstrating His meticulous involvement in human history to maintain the line through which His redemptive plan would unfold, ultimately leading to the Messiah. This is evident throughout the genealogies, ensuring the continuity from Adam to Noah, and later to Abraham and beyond. Lastly, it subtly reinforces the theme of The Progression of Sin and Impending Judgment, as the long lives of the patriarchs stand in stark contrast to the increasing corruption of humanity, foreshadowing the divine reckoning that would come upon the earth (see Genesis 6:11-13).
Exposition and Analysis
Genesis 5:25, stating, "And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech," transcends a mere historical data point; it stands as a profound testament to divine patience and the unfolding of God's redemptive plan. Methuselah, whose name is traditionally interpreted to mean "his death brings judgment," holds a unique and prophetic place in biblical history. His extraordinary lifespan, detailed further in Genesis 5:27, made him the longest-living individual recorded in the Bible, reaching 969 years.
The timing of Methuselah's life and death is deeply significant. According to meticulous biblical chronology, the Great Flood occurred in the very year of Methuselah's passing. This precise alignment suggests that God's judgment was mercifully withheld for nearly a millennium, a period of immense grace symbolized by Methuselah's continued existence. His life thus served as a silent, living prophecy, marking the duration of God's longsuffering before the world's pervasive wickedness necessitated a cleansing judgment, as described in Genesis 6:5-7.
The birth of Lamech, Methuselah's son, is equally crucial within this genealogical progression. Lamech would subsequently become the father of Noah, the one through whom God would preserve humanity from the deluge. Consequently, this verse not only highlights Methuselah's prophetic role but also critically advances the genealogical line towards the chosen family that would survive the Flood and become the new progenitor of humanity. The meticulous detail embedded in these genealogies underscores God's active and sovereign involvement in human history, carefully preserving the lineage through which His ultimate plan of salvation would be realized.
Key Word Analysis
Meaning "man of a dart." This etymology, combined with traditional interpretations, suggests "his death brings judgment." This prophetic nuance is crucial, as his death coincided with the Great Flood, making his life a living testament to God's extended patience before the inevitable judgment.
Meaning "to live, whether literally or figuratively; causatively, to revive." In this context, it emphasizes the literal longevity of Methuselah, highlighting the remarkable lifespans of the antediluvian patriarchs and setting the stage for the prophetic significance of his age.
Meaning "to bear young; causatively, to beget." This term is foundational to the genealogical purpose of Genesis 5. It signifies the unbroken chain of descent, ensuring the continuation of the human line and, more specifically, the messianic line through which God's redemptive plan would be realized.
Verse Breakdown
"And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years"
This clause precisely states Methuselah's age at a pivotal moment in his life. The extraordinary number of years highlights the distinct characteristics of the antediluvian era, where human lifespans were significantly longer than in post-Flood times. It also sets the stage for the calculation of the timing of the Great Flood in relation to his death.
"and begat Lamech"
This concise phrase is of immense genealogical and theological significance. It identifies Lamech as Methuselah's direct descendant, thereby continuing the unbroken lineage from Adam through Seth that leads directly to Noah. This act of "begetting" is not merely a biological event but a divinely orchestrated step in the preservation of the human family and the specific line chosen for God's redemptive purposes.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Genesis 5:25, and indeed throughout Genesis 5, is Genealogy. This meticulous listing of generations, complete with ages at fatherhood and total lifespan, serves not merely as a historical record but as a theological framework. It establishes the historical continuity of humanity from creation and, crucially, traces the specific lineage through which God's covenant promises would be preserved and eventually fulfilled. Beyond the literal record, there is profound Symbolism embedded in Methuselah's name and extraordinary longevity. His name, "his death brings judgment," coupled with his death coinciding with the Flood, transforms his life into a living prophecy, symbolizing God's immense patience while simultaneously Foreshadowing the inevitable judgment that would come upon a wicked world. The stark contrast between the long lives of the patriarchs and the impending global catastrophe also creates dramatic Irony, as the very longevity that seems to promise enduring life instead marks the countdown to widespread death.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Genesis 5:25, though a simple genealogical entry, is rich with theological significance. It powerfully illustrates God's immense patience in the face of escalating human sin, delaying judgment for centuries, yet ultimately demonstrating its certainty. Methuselah's life serves as a living testament to this divine longsuffering, a period of grace before the inevitable reckoning. Furthermore, the meticulous recording of this lineage underscores God's sovereign hand in guiding human history, meticulously preserving a specific line—the Sethic line—vital for the unfolding of His redemptive plan and the eventual advent of the Messiah. This continuity, despite humanity's pervasive corruption, affirms God's faithfulness to His promises, ensuring that His ultimate purpose of salvation would be realized through a chosen people.
Reflection and Application
Genesis 5:25, though concise, invites profound reflection on God's immense patience in the face of human sin and the unwavering certainty of His justice. Methuselah's life serves as a powerful reminder that while divine grace is extended, it is not limitless, and judgment, though delayed, will assuredly come. This should stir in us both gratitude for God's longsuffering and a sober awareness of our accountability. It also encourages us to recognize God's steadfast faithfulness in preserving His purposes across generations, assuring us that His grand redemptive plan for humanity continues to unfold, even through seemingly ordinary lives and meticulous genealogical records. For us today, this means trusting in God's perfect timing, whether in His patience with the world or in the fulfillment of His promises in our own lives. We are called to live wisely in the interim, bearing witness to His grace and warning of His coming judgment, just as Methuselah's life implicitly did.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is Methuselah's age so important?
Methuselah's age is significant for two primary reasons: First, at 969 years, he is the oldest person recorded in the Bible, highlighting the extraordinary longevity characteristic of the pre-Flood world. Second, the traditional interpretation of his name ("his death brings judgment") combined with the fact that the Great Flood occurred in the very year of his death, makes his lifespan a powerful, living symbol of God's extended patience before the inevitable onset of judgment, as described in Genesis 7:6.
What is the significance of the name "Methuselah"?
The Hebrew name "Methuselah" (מְתוּשֶׁלַח, Metushelach) is widely interpreted to mean "his death brings judgment" or "man of the dart/spear." This interpretation holds profound significance because, according to biblical chronology, Methuselah died in the precise year the Great Flood began, effectively making his life a prophetic countdown to God's global judgment upon a wicked world, as detailed in Genesis 6:17.
How does this verse connect to the story of Noah?
Genesis 5:25 states that Methuselah begat Lamech. Lamech, in turn, is the father of Noah, as explicitly stated in Genesis 5:28-29. This verse is therefore a crucial and direct link in the lineage leading to Noah, the one chosen by God to survive the catastrophic Flood and perpetuate humanity, becoming the new progenitor of all post-diluvian peoples, as recorded in Genesis 9:1.
Why are these genealogies so detailed in Genesis?
The detailed genealogies in Genesis serve multiple critical purposes: they establish the historical accuracy and continuity of the biblical narrative, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving a chosen lineage from Adam to the patriarchs. They affirm the literal historical progression of humanity. Ultimately, they trace the precise line through which the promised Messiah would eventually come, ensuring the fulfillment of God's redemptive plan. These are not mere lists but foundational elements of God's unfolding redemptive history, affirming His active involvement in human affairs, as seen in the broader narrative of Genesis 1, Genesis 2, Genesis 3, Genesis 4, Genesis 5, Genesis 6, Genesis 7, Genesis 8, Genesis 9, Genesis 10, Genesis 11.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Genesis 5:25 does not directly speak of Christ, it is an indispensable link in the genealogical chain that ultimately leads to His incarnation. Methuselah's son, Lamech, is the father of Noah, through whom humanity was miraculously preserved from the global judgment of the Flood. This meticulously recorded lineage powerfully demonstrates God's sovereign commitment to His overarching redemptive plan, ensuring the survival of the very line from which the Messiah would eventually come. Methuselah is explicitly named in the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Luke 3:37, highlighting his integral, albeit indirect, role in the unfolding of salvation history that culminates in the person and redemptive work of Jesus, the ultimate deliverer from sin and the final arbiter of judgment. Just as Methuselah's life prophetically marked the duration of God's patience before the Flood, so too does the entire Old Testament narrative, including these genealogies, point forward to Christ as the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises and the one through whom eternal life is offered, as declared in John 3:16.