TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 10:15–44.
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ezra 10:25 presents a specific entry within a meticulous register of individuals who had contracted forbidden foreign marriages during the post-exilic period and subsequently complied with the decree to separate from them. This verse precisely names seven men from the influential family of Parosh, illustrating the pervasive nature of this spiritual transgression across various segments of the Israelite community that had returned from Babylonian captivity and committed to covenant renewal.
Context
Literary Context
Ezra 10:25 is situated within the climactic final chapter of the book of Ezra, which meticulously details the drastic measures undertaken to address the widespread sin of intermarriage. Following Ezra's profound lament and prayer in Ezra 9, the people, prompted by Shecaniah, confessed their transgression and proposed a solemn covenant to put away their foreign wives and children, acknowledging the severity of their disobedience (Ezra 10:1-5). The remainder of chapter 10, beginning from Ezra 10:18 onwards, provides a comprehensive register of the men—categorized by their familial and professional groups (priests, Levites, gatekeepers, and then the general populace)—who had committed this offense and subsequently complied with the difficult but necessary decree. This detailed enumeration, including the specific names in Ezra 10:25, serves not merely as a historical record but as a powerful testament to the seriousness of the reform and the personal accountability involved in the community's commitment to spiritual purity and covenant fidelity.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Ezra 10 transpire in Jerusalem during the critical post-exilic period, approximately 458 BC, following the second wave of exiles who had returned from Babylon under the spiritual leadership of Ezra. At this juncture, the Jewish community was earnestly striving to re-establish its distinct identity and renew its covenant relationship with Yahweh in the land of Judah. Intermarriage with the surrounding "peoples of the lands" (e.g., Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Jebusites) was explicitly and repeatedly forbidden by Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4). This prohibition was not rooted in ethnic prejudice but in a profound theological imperative: to preserve Israel's spiritual purity, prevent assimilation into idolatrous practices, and safeguard the unique lineage through which God's redemptive plan would unfold. The cultural context reveals a community grappling with the immense temptation to compromise their distinctiveness for social or economic integration, a challenge met with severe measures to reassert their exclusive allegiance to Yahweh and His covenant.
Key Themes
This verse, as an integral part of the broader narrative of Ezra 10, significantly contributes to several profound theological and narrative themes. The most prominent is Spiritual Purity and Separation, emphasizing the non-negotiable imperative for God's people to maintain their distinct identity and holiness, avoiding any influences that could lead them away from covenant loyalty and into idolatry. The intermarriage was perceived as a direct and existential threat to the spiritual health and very continuation of the covenant community. Another crucial theme is Obedience to God's Law, as the drastic actions described in Ezra 10 vividly demonstrate a renewed, albeit painful, commitment to obey God's commandments, even when it demanded immense personal sacrifice. This act of putting away foreign wives was a tangible, costly expression of repentance and adherence to the Mosaic Law, reflecting a deep desire to restore a right relationship with God after generations of disobedience that led to exile. Finally, the Accountability and Specificity inherent in the meticulous listing of individual names, such as those in Ezra 10:25, underscores personal responsibility within the communal context and the thoroughness of the reform. It highlights that the purification was not a vague, abstract decree but involved specific individuals taking concrete, often agonizing, steps to align their lives with God's revealed will, contributing to a larger movement of national repentance and spiritual renewal, as seen in the broader post-exilic reforms detailed in Nehemiah.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This term refers not to a personal name but to a prominent family or clan, listed first among those from the general population who had taken foreign wives in Ezra 10:25. According to the provided Strong's data (H6551), it is "the same as פַּרְעֹשׁ; Parosh, the name of our Israelite; Parosh, Pharosh." The sons of Parosh were among the first and most numerous to return with Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:3) and continued to play a significant role in the community, with some even helping to rebuild the wall in Nehemiah's time (Nehemiah 3:25). Their inclusion in this list underscores that the sin of intermarriage was not confined to marginalized groups but affected even leading and established families, highlighting the pervasive nature of the problem across all strata of society.
Meaning "God (is) helper," Eleazar is a common and highly significant name in Israelite history, perhaps most famously borne by Aaron's son and successor as High Priest (Numbers 3:32). The presence of such a name, carrying a profound theological meaning of divine assistance, among those who had sinned by intermarriage creates a poignant irony. It serves as a powerful reminder that even individuals whose names declare God's help and intervention can fall into disobedience, emphasizing the constant human need for vigilance, humility, and repentance in maintaining covenant fidelity.
Meaning "Jah has built" or "Yahweh has established," Benaiah is another name with a clear theological connection to God's creative, sustaining, and establishing power. It was famously the name of one of David's mighty men and Solomon's chief commander (2 Samuel 23:20). Similar to Eleazar, the inclusion of Benaiah in this list highlights the widespread nature of the transgression and the fact that even those whose names reflected a deep connection to God's work were not immune to spiritual compromise. The act of "putting away" their foreign wives was, in a profound sense, a painful but necessary act of rebuilding or re-establishing their covenant relationship with the God who had built and established their nation.
Verse Breakdown
"Moreover of Israel:"
This introductory phrase serves to broaden the scope of the preceding lists, which had focused on priests, Levites, and gatekeepers (Ezra 10:18-24). By stating "of Israel," the text indicates that the following list pertains to the general population, signifying that the problem of intermarriage was not limited to the religious leadership but extended throughout the broader community. This underscores the national scope of the sin and the subsequent, comprehensive repentance required for spiritual restoration.
"of the sons of Parosh;"
This clause precisely specifies the particular family or clan from which the subsequent individuals originated. As noted in the Key Word Analysis, the sons of Parosh constituted a prominent and numerous group among the returnees from exile. Identifying them by their clan emphasizes the communal nature of the transgression and the collective responsibility within the family unit, even as individual names are listed. It highlights that the reform touched even the most established and influential segments of post-exilic society, demonstrating the thoroughness of the purification process.
"Ramiah, and Jeziah, and Malchiah, and Miamin, and Eleazar, and Malchijah, and Benaiah."
This is the precise enumeration of seven specific men from the family of Parosh who were found to have taken foreign wives. The meticulous listing of names serves several critical functions: it provides a verifiable, historical record of those who had sinned and subsequently complied with the decree; it powerfully highlights personal accountability within the community; and it demonstrates the thoroughness and seriousness of the purification process. Each name represents an individual act of repentance and obedience, contributing to the larger national restoration and a renewed commitment to covenant fidelity.
Literary Devices
Ezra 10:25 primarily employs Enumeration (or Cataloging), a widely used literary device in biblical historical and legal texts. This technique involves the systematic listing of names, places, or items. In this verse, the enumeration of seven specific individuals from the family of Parosh serves to provide a precise and verifiable record of those implicated in the intermarriage crisis. This detailed listing underscores the Specificity and Accountability inherent in the reform movement; the pervasive problem was not abstract but involved real people, and the solution demanded concrete actions from individuals. The meticulous list also functions as a form of Historical Record-keeping, documenting both the extent of the transgression and the thoroughness of the community's response. By naming each person, the text emphasizes the personal cost and commitment involved in the national repentance, transforming a general decree into a series of individual acts of difficult but necessary obedience.
Theological and Thematic Connections
The specific listing in Ezra 10:25, within the broader context of the intermarriage crisis, powerfully illustrates the Old Testament emphasis on covenant fidelity and the preservation of Israel's distinct identity as God's chosen people. Theologically, the separation from foreign wives was not merely a social or cultural act but a profound spiritual imperative, designed to safeguard the purity of the worship of Yahweh and prevent the syncretism and idolatry that had plagued Israel in previous generations and led to their exile. This painful act underscored the seriousness of God's covenant commands and the dire consequences of disobedience, while also highlighting the grace of God in providing a path to repentance and restoration. It serves as a stark reminder that true devotion to God often requires difficult choices to separate from anything that compromises one's spiritual integrity or exclusive allegiance to Him.
Reflection and Application
While the specific cultural context of intermarriage with pagan nations may differ significantly today, the underlying principles of Ezra 10:25 remain profoundly relevant for believers in every age. This passage calls us to critically examine our own lives and relationships, asking what influences, entanglements, or compromises might subtly undermine our devotion to God or draw us away from the clear teaching of His Word. The timeless need for spiritual discernment and a courageous willingness to separate from ungodly influences or practices extends far beyond marital relationships to encompass our choices in friendships, entertainment, business partnerships, and the values we embrace. True repentance often involves difficult decisions and personal sacrifice, requiring us to prioritize God's will and holiness above personal comfort, social acceptance, or worldly gain. The men in Ezra's time made painful choices to align themselves with God's covenant; similarly, following Christ may require us to forsake certain comforts, relationships, or worldly pursuits for the sake of higher spiritual values and the purity of our walk with Him. The detailed record in Ezra 10 also highlights the importance of accountability within a faith community, reminding us that we are called to encourage one another in righteousness and address sin seriously for the health, integrity, and witness of the body of Christ.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is this list of names so important in the book of Ezra?
The meticulous listing of names in Ezra 10, including those in Ezra 10:25, serves several crucial purposes. Firstly, it provides a historical record of the individuals involved in the widespread sin of intermarriage, confirming the pervasive nature of the problem across various social strata. Secondly, it powerfully emphasizes personal accountability; each named individual was personally implicated in the transgression and personally committed to the act of repentance and separation. This specificity underscores that the reform was not a vague decree but a concrete, individual-by-individual process. Thirdly, it highlights the seriousness and thoroughness of the purification effort. By documenting every person, the text demonstrates the community's unwavering commitment to fully address the sin and restore covenant fidelity, ensuring that the painful lessons of the exile—which was partly due to idolatry and spiritual compromise—were truly learned. It also served as a public testament to their renewed commitment to God's law, as seen in the broader covenant renewal in Nehemiah 9-10.
Was it fair to make them put away their wives and children?
This is undeniably one of the most ethically challenging aspects of Ezra's reform for modern readers. From a biblical-theological perspective within the Old Covenant, the command to separate was understood as a necessary, albeit painful and severe, measure to preserve the spiritual purity and very existence of the covenant community. Intermarriage with pagan nations was seen as a direct violation of God's explicit commands (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4) because it invariably led to idolatry, syncretism, and the corruption of Israel's unique identity as God's chosen people. The previous exile was a direct consequence of such spiritual compromise. Therefore, the drastic action was viewed as a matter of national survival and spiritual integrity, preventing a repeat of past failures and ensuring the preservation of the holy lineage through which the Messiah would eventually come. While undeniably harsh and difficult to reconcile with modern sensibilities, it was considered a covenant requirement essential for the nation's spiritual health and its future role in God's redemptive plan.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
The painful separation described in Ezra 10:25 and the broader chapter, though rooted in the specific demands of the Old Covenant law, ultimately points forward to the superior and more profound purification found in Christ. While the Israelites sought external purity through physical separation from foreign wives to maintain their distinct identity, Christ offers an internal and spiritual cleansing that transforms the very heart and nature of humanity. The Old Testament's emphasis on a holy people, set apart from the nations, finds its ultimate fulfillment in the Church, which is called to be a holy bride for Christ, "without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless" (Ephesians 5:25-27). Jesus, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, provides a perfect and once-for-all sacrifice that cleanses us from all unrighteousness, making external measures of separation secondary to internal transformation by the Holy Spirit (Hebrews 9:11-14). Believers are now called to be a "holy nation, a people for God's own possession" (1 Peter 2:9-10), not by literally putting away physical spouses, but by putting off the old self and its sinful desires (Colossians 3:5-10) and being spiritually united to Christ, who is our true purity, identity, and righteousness. The covenant loyalty demanded in Ezra is fulfilled in our unwavering allegiance to Jesus, who has established a new and better covenant through His shed blood, writing His laws on our hearts and minds (Hebrews 8:6-13).