TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Ezra 10:15–44.
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Ezra 10:26 serves as a precise record of six men from the "sons of Elam" who were identified as having taken foreign wives, a practice explicitly forbidden by God's covenant law. This verse is part of a comprehensive and solemn register in Ezra 10, documenting individuals who, in a profound act of national repentance and renewed obedience, confessed their sin of intermarriage and committed to dissolving these unlawful unions. It powerfully underscores the deeply personal and communal cost inherent in the spiritual purification of post-exilic Judah, emphasizing the gravity of their covenant relationship with God and the necessity of radical adherence to His commands.
Context
Literary Context
Ezra 10:26 is situated within the climactic narrative of repentance and reform that concludes the book of Ezra. Following Ezra's deeply moving prayer of confession and lament in Ezra 9, the assembled community, profoundly impacted by his anguish, resolves to make a solemn covenant with God. This covenant involves a painful but necessary commitment to put away their foreign wives and children, as articulated in Ezra 10:3. This resolution initiates a meticulous judicial process to investigate and address the widespread issue of intermarriage throughout the community. Verses Ezra 10:18-44 then present an exhaustive and somber list of the men found guilty of this transgression, organized systematically by their family lines. Our specific verse, Ezra 10:26, contributes to this detailed roster, highlighting the thoroughness of the reform efforts and the pervasive nature of the problem within the returning remnant. The inclusion of specific names underscores both personal accountability and the public, communal nature of their repentance.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events described in Ezra 10 unfold in Jerusalem during the critical post-exilic period, likely around 458 BC, following the return of a significant contingent of Jewish exiles from Babylon under the spiritual leadership of Ezra. The Jewish community was in a fragile state, having only recently re-established itself in Judah after seventy years of captivity—a punishment widely understood to be a consequence of their ancestors' idolatry and persistent covenant unfaithfulness. The divine command against intermarriage with pagan nations was not new; it was an ancient and foundational principle, clearly articulated in texts such as Deuteronomy 7:3-4. This prohibition was vital because such unions invariably led to syncretism, idolatry, and the dilution of Israel's unique identity as God's chosen, holy people. In this precarious post-exilic era, maintaining a distinct national and spiritual identity, along with covenant purity, was paramount for the survival of the fragile community and the preservation of their monotheistic faith against the constant threat of assimilation by surrounding polytheistic cultures.
Key Themes
The meticulous listing of names in Ezra 10 and specifically in Ezra 10:26 powerfully reinforces several key themes central to the book of Ezra and the broader Old Testament narrative. First, Obedience to God's Law is presented as non-negotiable; the people's willingness to undertake such a painful separation demonstrates a profound, renewed commitment to the Torah, even when it demands immense personal and familial sacrifice. Second, Spiritual Purity and Separation from pagan influences is highlighted as absolutely essential for the covenant community's survival and spiritual health, reflecting God's consistent desire for a holy people, as expressed in passages like Leviticus 11:44. Third, the narrative powerfully underscores the theme of Repentance and Restoration, showing that genuine repentance involves not merely sorrow for sin but concrete, decisive actions to rectify wrongdoing and restore a right relationship with God. Finally, the communal nature of the sin and the public listing of names emphasize Community Accountability and Corporate Responsibility, illustrating that the spiritual well-being of the entire body is intricately dependent on the faithfulness of its individual members, a principle vividly seen in the corporate confession in Ezra 9:6-7.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From the root meaning "to build," this term signifies a son as a "builder of the family name." In its widest sense, it encompasses literal and figurative relationships, including descendants, subjects, or members of a nation or group. Here, "sons of Elam" denotes individuals belonging to a specific ancestral line or clan, emphasizing their familial identity and the collective nature of their transgression and subsequent repentance within their lineage.
Possibly meaning "hidden" or "distant," Elam refers to a son of Shem and his descendants, as well as their ancient country, located east of Mesopotamia. In this context, it identifies a specific tribal or family line within the Jewish community that had returned from Babylonian exile. Its inclusion signifies that the problem of intermarriage was widespread, affecting various established families, and that the reform was systematically applied across these distinct family units.
Meaning "gift of Jah" or "gift of the Lord," this is a common Hebrew name appearing multiple times in the Old Testament. The presence of a man bearing a name signifying God's gracious provision, yet involved in a practice that defiled the covenant relationship with that very God, creates a poignant irony. This inclusion highlights that even individuals with seemingly pious or divinely connected names were implicated in the transgression, underscoring the pervasive depth of the spiritual compromise.
Verse Breakdown
"And of the sons of Elam;"
This introductory phrase functions as a clear heading, precisely identifying the specific family or clan from which the following individuals originated. It structures the list of offenders by their ancestral lineage, highlighting the organized and thorough nature of the investigation and the subsequent record-keeping process. This detail underscores that the problem of intermarriage was not random but affected specific, identifiable segments of the community, requiring a systematic response.
"Mattaniah, Zechariah, and Jehiel, and Abdi, and Jeremoth, and Eliah."
This is a straightforward enumeration of six distinct male names. Each name represents an individual who had taken a foreign wife and was now publicly identified as part of the group committing to the painful act of separation. The deliberate listing of names, rather than a general statement, imparts a sense of solemnity, personal accountability, and historical precision to the record, making the repentance concrete and deeply personal for each man involved.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in Ezra 10:26, and indeed throughout the entire list in Ezra 10:18-44, is Enumeration or Cataloguing. The meticulous listing of names serves to underscore the pervasive nature of the sin of intermarriage and the thoroughness and gravity of the community's response. This detailed enumeration transforms an abstract problem into a concrete reality, demonstrating the painful but absolutely necessary extent of the reform. It also functions as a form of Public Record, serving as a solemn testament to the community's corporate repentance and unwavering commitment to covenant fidelity. The very act of naming each individual emphasizes Accountability, ensuring that no one's transgression or subsequent act of obedience went unacknowledged. Furthermore, the presence of many theophoric names (names containing a divine element, such as "Yah" for Yahweh) among those listed creates a subtle Irony, as individuals bearing names that honor God were found to be in direct violation of His explicit commands.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Ezra 10:26, as an integral part of the larger Ezra 10 narrative, profoundly illustrates the Old Testament emphasis on covenant fidelity and the sanctity of Israel's distinct identity as God's chosen people. The drastic action of putting away foreign wives, while culturally specific to ancient Israel's unique role as a holy nation set apart by God, underscores a timeless theological principle: God demands holiness and separation from anything that compromises one's exclusive relationship with Him. This event serves as a stark reminder that true repentance often requires painful, costly actions that align one's life with God's revealed will, prioritizing divine commands over personal comfort, societal norms, or even familial ties. It highlights the corporate dimension of sin and repentance, where the actions of individuals profoundly impact the spiritual well-being of the entire community, and collective action is often necessary for corporate restoration and renewal.
Reflection and Application
The stark record of Ezra 10:26, meticulously listing men who put away their foreign wives, confronts us with the challenging demands of true obedience and the profound cost of spiritual purity. While the specific command against intermarriage was unique to ancient Israel's covenant identity and their role as a distinct nation, the underlying principles resonate deeply with the Christian call to holiness and separation from the world's defiling influences. We are challenged to honestly examine areas in our own lives where compromise with worldly values, ungodly influences, or cultural norms might be subtly eroding our spiritual integrity and our exclusive devotion to Christ. This verse calls us to a radical commitment to God's Word, even when it requires us to make difficult, counter-cultural choices that may involve significant personal pain, social disapproval, or deep sacrifice. It reminds us that genuine repentance is not merely an emotional feeling or an intellectual assent but a decisive turning away from sin, often requiring tangible actions to align our lives fully with Christ's Lordship. Our spiritual health, both individually and corporately as the church, depends on our willingness to separate ourselves from anything that would defile our devotion to God and compromise our witness in a fallen world.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was intermarriage such a serious sin for the Israelites in the post-exilic period?
For ancient Israel, intermarriage with people from surrounding pagan nations was strictly forbidden by God's Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4) primarily because it posed an existential threat to their spiritual identity and their unique covenant relationship with Yahweh. These foreign wives would inevitably introduce their idolatrous practices and gods into Israelite homes, leading the Israelites away from the worship of the one true God. This spiritual defilement had historically been a major cause of Israel's apostasy and subsequent divine judgment, including the Babylonian exile from which they had just returned. In the precarious post-exilic period, maintaining spiritual purity and a distinct national identity was absolutely crucial for the survival and unique mission of the fragile Jewish remnant as God's chosen people.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Ezra 10:26 details a specific act of Old Covenant obedience and purification—the painful putting away of foreign wives—it powerfully points forward to the ultimate and perfect separation achieved through Christ. This Old Testament event foreshadows the radical call of the New Covenant to separate from the "world" not primarily by physical divorce, but by spiritual transformation and exclusive allegiance to Christ alone. Jesus himself calls for a similar radical commitment, stating that those who would follow Him must deny themselves, take up their cross daily, and follow Him. The New Testament church, as the new Israel, is called to be a holy people, set apart for God, explicitly warned not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers (as seen in 2 Corinthians 6:14-18). Instead, believers are to live as lights in the darkness, reflecting the purity and holiness of Christ. Ultimately, Christ is the true "temple" in whom God dwells, and through His perfect sacrifice on the cross, He provides the means for radical cleansing from sin and reconciliation with God, making us a holy people, a spiritual house built on Him (as profoundly described in 1 Peter 2:5). The painful separation in Ezra points to the joyous reality that in Christ, we are made truly pure and united to God, no longer needing to physically separate from specific people groups, but spiritually separating from sin and the world's corrupt system to live for Him who bought us with His precious, unblemished blood (as in 1 Peter 1:18-19).