TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Malachi 2:10–17. His four-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Corrupt practices are the genuine fruit and product of corrupt principles; and the badness of men's hearts and lives is owing to some loose atheistical notions which they have got and which they govern themselves by. Now, in these verses, we have an instance of this; we here find men dealing falsely with one another, and it is because they think falsely of their God. Observe,
I.How corrupt their practices were.
In general, they dealt treacherously every man against his brother, Mal 2:10. It cannot be expected that he who is false to his God should be true to his friend. They had dealt treacherously with God in his tithes and offerings, and had defrauded him, and thus conscience was debauched, its bonds and cords were broken, a door was opened to all manner of injustice and dishonesty, and the bonds of relation and natural affection are broken through likewise and no difficulty made of it. Some think that the treacherous dealings here reproved are the same with those instances of oppression and extortion which we find complained of to Nehemiah about this time, Neh 5:3-7. Therein they forgot the God of their fathers, and the covenant of their fathers, and rendered their offerings unacceptable, Isa 1:11. But it seems rather to refer to what was amiss in their marriages, which was likewise complained of, Neh 13:23. Two things they are here charged with, as very provoking to God in this matter - taking strange wives of heathen nations, and abusing and putting away the wives they had of their own nation; in both these they dealt treacherously and violated a sacred covenant; the former was in contempt of the covenant of peculiarity, the latter of the marriage-covenant.
1.In contempt of the covenant God made with Israel, as a peculiar people to himself, they married strange wives, which was expressly prohibited, and provided against, in that covenant, Deu 7:3. Observe here,
(1.)What good reason they had to deal faithfully with God and one another in this covenant, and not to make marriages with the heathen.
[1.]They were expressly bound out from such marriages by covenant. God engaged to do them good upon this condition, that they should not mingle with the heathen; this was the covenant of their fathers, the covenant made with their fathers, denoting the antiquity and the authority of it, and its being the great charter by which that nation was incorporated. They lay under all possible obligations to observe it strictly, yet they profaned it, as if they were not bound by it. Those profane the covenant of their fathers who live in disobedience to the command of the God of their fathers.
[2.]They were a peculiar people, united in one body, and therefore ought to have united for the preserving of the honour of their peculiarity: Have we not all one Father? Yes, we have, for has not one God created us? Are we not all his offspring? And are we not made of one blood? Yes, certainly we are. God is a common Father to all mankind, and, upon that account, all we are brethren, members one of another, and therefore ought to put away lying (Eph 4:25), and not to deal treacherously, no, not any man against his brother. But here it seems to refer to the Jewish nation: Have we not all one father, Abraham, or Jacob? This they prided themselves in, We have Abraham to our father; but here it is turned upon them as an aggravation of their sin in betraying the honour of their nation by intermarrying with heathens: "Has not one God created us, that is, formed us into a people, made us a nation by ourselves, and put a life into us, distinct from that of other nations? And should not this oblige us to maintain the dignity of our character?" Note, The consideration of the unity of the church in Christ, its founder and Father, should engage us carefully to preserve the purity of the church and to guard against all corruptions.
[3.]They were dedicated to God, as well as distinguished from the neighbouring nations. Israel was holiness to the Lord (Jer 2:3), taken into covenant with him, set apart by him for himself, to be to him for a name and a praise, and upon this account he loved them and delighted in them; the sanctuary set up among them was the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, of which he said, It is my rest for ever, here will I dwell, for I have desired it; but by marrying strange wives they profaned this holiness, and laid the honour of it in the dust. Note, Those who are devoted to God, and beloved of him, are concerned to preserve their integrity, that they may not throw themselves out of his love, nor lose the honour, or defeat the end, of their dedication to him.
(2.)How treacherously they dealt, notwithstanding, They profaned themselves in that very thing which was prescribed to them for the preserving of the honour of their singularity: Judah has married the daughter of a strange god. The harm was not so much that she was the daughter of a strange nation (God has made all nations of men, and is himself King of nations), but that she was the daughter of a strange god, trained up in the service and worship of false gods, at their disposal, as a daughter at her father's disposal, and having a dependence upon them; hence some of the rabbin (quoted by Dr. Pocock) say, He that marries a heathen woman is as if he made himself son-in-law to an idol. The corruption of the old world began with the intermarriages of the sons of God with the daughters of men, Gen 6:2. It is the same thing that is here complained of, but as it is expressed it sounds worse: The sons of God married the daughters of a strange god. Herein Judah is said to have dealt treacherously, for they basely betrayed their own honour and profaned that holiness of the Lord which they should have loved (so some read it); and it is said to be an abomination committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; it was hateful to God, and very unbecoming those that were called by his name. Note, it is an abominable thing for those who profess the holiness of the Lord to profane it, particularly by yoking themselves unequally with unbelievers.
(3.)How severely God would reckon with them for it (Mal 2:12): The Lord will cut off the man that doeth this, that marries the daughter of a strange god. He has, in effect, cut himself off from the holy nation, and joined in with foreigners and aliens to the commonwealth of Israel, and so shall his doom be; God will cut him off, him and all that belongs to him; so the original intimates. He shall be cut off from Israel and from Jerusalem, and not be written among the living there. The Lord will cut off both the master and the scholar, that are guilty of this sin, both the teachers and the taught. The blind leaders and the blind followers shall fall together into the ditch, both him that wakeneth and him that answereth (so it is in the margin), for the master calls up his scholar to his business, and stirs him up in it. They shall be cut off together out of the tabernacles of Jacob. God will no more own them as belonging to his nation; nay, and the priest that offers an offering to the Lord, if he marry a strange wife (as we find many of the priests did, Ezr 10:18), shall not escape; the offering he offers shall not atone for him, but he shall be cut off from the temple of the Lord, as others from the tabernacles of Jacob. Nehemiah chased away from him, and from the priesthood, one of the sons of the high priest, whom he found guilty of this sin, Neh 13:28.
2.In contempt of the marriage-covenant, which God instituted for the common benefit of mankind, they abused and put away the wives they had of their own nation, probably to make room for those strange wives, when it was all the fashion to marry such (Mal 2:13): This also have you done; this is the second article of the charge. For the way of sin is down-hill, and one violation of the covenant is an inlet to another.
(1.)Let us see what it is that is here complained of. they did not behave as they ought to have done towards their wives.
[1.]They were cross with them, froward and peevish, and made their lives bitter to them, so that when they came with their wives and families to worship God at the solemn feasts, which they should have done with rejoicing, they were all out of humour; the poor wives were ready to break their hearts, and, not daring to make their case known to any other, they complained to God, and covered the altar of the Lord with tears, with weeping, and with crying. This is illustrated by the instance of Hannah, who, upon the account of her husband's having another wife (though otherwise a kind husband), and the discontent thence arising, whenever they went up to the house of the Lord to worship fretted and wept, and was in bitterness of soul, and would not eat, Sa1 1:6, Sa1 1:7, Sa1 1:10. So it was with these wives here; and this was so contrary to the cheerfulness which God requires in his worshippers that it spoiled the acceptableness of their devotions: God regards not their offering any more. See here what a good Master we serve, who will not have his altar covered with tears, but compassed with songs. This condemns those who left his worship for that of idols, among the rites of which we find women weeping for Tammuz (Eze 8:14), and the blood of the worshippers gushing out upon the altar, Kg1 18:28. See also what a wicked thing it is to put others out of frame for the cheerful worship of God; though it is their fault by their fretfulness to indispose themselves for their duty, yet it is much more the fault of those who provoked them to make them to fret. It is a reason given why yoke-fellows should live in holy love and joy - that their prayers may not be hindered, Pe1 3:7.
[2.]They dealt treacherously with them, Mal 2:14-16. They did not perform their promises to them, but defrauded them of their maintenance or dower, or took in concubines, to share in the affection that was due to their wives only.
[3.]They put them away, gave them a bill of divorce, and turned them off, nay, perhaps they did it without the ceremony that the law of Moses prescribed, Mal 2:16.
[4.]In all this they covered violence with their garment; they abused their wives, and were vexatious to them, and yet, in the sight of others, they pretended to be very loving to them and tender of them, and to cast a skirt over them. It is common for those who do violence to advance some specious pretence or other wherewith to cover it as with a garment.
(2.)Let us see the proof and aggravations of the charge.
[1.]It is sufficiently proved by the testimony of God himself: "The Lord has been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth (Mal 2:14), has been witness to the marriage-covenant between thee and her, for to him you appealed concerning your sincerity in it and fidelity to it; he has been a witness to all the violations of it, and all thy treacherous dealings in contempt of it, and is ready to judge between thee and her." Note, This should engage us to be faithful both to God and to all with whom we have to do, that God himself is a witness both to all our covenants and to all our covenant-breaches; and he is a witness against whom there lies no exception.
[2.]It is highly aggravated by the consideration of the person wronged and abused. First, "She is thy wife; thy own, bone of thy bone and flesh of thy flesh, the nearest to thee of all the relations thou hast in the world, and to cleave to whom thou must quit the rest." Secondly, "She is the wife of thy youth, who had thy affections when they were at the strongest, was thy first choice, and with whom thou hast lived long. Let not the darling of thy youth be the scorn and loathing of thy age." Thirdly, "She is thy companion; she has long been an equal sharer with thee in thy cares, and griefs, and joys." The wife is to be looked upon, not as a servant, but as a companion to the husband, with whom he should freely converse and take sweet counsel, as with a friend, and in whose company he should take delight more than in any other's; for is she not appointed to be thy companion? Fourthly, "She is the wife of thy covenant, to whom thou art so firmly bound that, while she continues faithful, thou canst not be loosed from her, for it was a covenant for life. It is the wife with whom thou hast covenanted, and who has covenanted with thee; there is an oath of God between you, which is not to be trifled with, is not to be played fast and loose with." Married people should often call to mind their marriage-vows, and review them with all seriousness, as those that make conscience of performing what they promised.
(3.)Let us see the reasons given why man and wife should continue together, to their lives' end, in holy love and peace, and neither quarrel with each other nor separate from each other.
[1.]Because god has joined them together (Mal 2:15): Did not he make one, one Eve for one Adam, that Adam might never take another to her to vex her (Lev 18:18), nor put her away to make room for another? It is great wickedness to complain of the law of marriage as a confinement, when Adam in innocency, in honour, in Eden, in the garden of pleasure, was confined to one. Yet God had the residue of the Spirit; he could have made another Eve, as amiable as that he did make, but, designing Adam a help meet for him, he made him one wife; had he made him more, he would not have had a meet help. And wherefore did he make but one woman for one man? It was that he might seek a godly seed - a seed of God (so the word is), a seed that should bear the image of God, be employed in the service of God, and be devoted to his glory and honour, - that every man having his own wife, and but one, according to the law, (Co1 7:2), they might live in chaste and holy love, under the directions and restraints of the divine law, and not, as brute beasts, under the dominion of lust, and thus might propagate the nature of man in such a way as might make it most likely to participate of a divine nature, - that the children, being born in holy matrimony, which is an ordinance of God, and by which the inclinations of nature are kept under the regulations of God's command, might thus be made a seed to serve him, and be bred, as they are born, under his direction and dominion. Note, The raising up of a godly seed, which shall be accounted to the Lord for a generation, is one great end of the institution of marriage; but that is a good reason why the marriage-bed should be kept undefiled and the marriage bond inviolable. Husbands and wives must therefore live in the fear of God, that their seed may be a godly seed, else were they unclean, but now they are holy, as children of the covenant, the marriage-covenant, which was a type of the covenant of grace, and the conjugal union, when thus preserved entire, of the mystical union between Christ and his church, in which he seeks and secures to himself a godly seed; see Eph 5:25, Eph 5:32.
[2.]Because he is much displeased with those who go about to put asunder what he has joined together (Mal 2:16): The God of Israel saith that he hateth putting away. He hath indeed permitted it to the Jews, for the hardness of their hearts, or, rather, limited and clogged it (Mat 19:8); but he hated it, especially as those practised it who put away their wives for every cause, Mat 19:3. Let those wives that elope from their husbands and put themselves away, those husbands that are cruel to their wives and turn them away, or take their affections off from their wives and place them upon others, yea, and those husbands and wives that live asunder by consent, for want of love to each other, let such as these know that the God of Israel hates such practices, however vain men may make a jest of them.
(4.)Let us see the caution inferred from all this. We have it twice (Mal 2:15): Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously against the wife of his youth; and again, Mal 2:16. Note, Those that would be kept from sin must take heed to their spirits, for there all sin begins; they must keep their hearts with all diligence, must keep a jealous eye upon them and a strict hand, and must watch against the first risings of sin there. We shall act as we are spirited; and therefore, that we may regulate our actions, we must consider what manner of spirit we are of; we must take heed to our spirits with reference to our particular relations, and see that we stand rightly affected to them and be of a good temper, for otherwise we shall be in danger of dealing treacherously. If our own hearts deal treacherously with us, whom will they not deal treacherously with?
II.Observe how corrupt their principles were, to which were owing all these corrupt practices.
Let us trace up the streams to the fountain (Mal 2:17): You have wearied the Lord with your words. They thought to evade the convictions of the word, and to justify themselves by cavilling with God's proceedings; but their defence was their offence, and their vindication of themselves was the aggravation of their crime; they affronted the Lord with their words, and repeated them so often, and persisted so long in their contradictions, that they even wearied him; see Isa 7:13. They made him weary of doing them good as he had done, and stopped the current of his favours; or they represented him as weary of governing the world, and willing to quit it and lay aside the care of it. Note, It is a wearisome thing, even to God himself, to hear people insist upon their own justification in their corrupt and wicked practices, and plead their atheistical principles in vindication of them. But, as if God by his prophet had done them wrong, see how impudently they ask, Wherein have we wearied him? What are those vexatious words whereby we have wearied him? Note, Sinful words are more offensive to the God of heaven than they are commonly thought to be. But God has his proofs ready; two things they had said, at least in their hearts (and thoughts are words to God), with which they had wearied him: - 1. They had denied him to be a holy God, and had asserted that concerning him which is directly contrary to the doctrine of his holiness. As he is a holy God, he hates sin, is of purer eyes than to behold it, and cannot endure to look upon it, Hab 1:13. He is not a God that has pleasure in wickedness, Psa 5:4. And yet they had the impudence to say, in direct contradiction to this, Every one that does evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and he delights in them. This wicked inference they drew, without any reason, from the prosperity of sinners in their sinful courses (see Mal 3:15), as if God's love or hatred were to be known by that which is before us, and those must be concluded good in the sight of the Lord who are rich in the world. Or this they said because they wished it might be so; they were resolved to do evil, and yet to think themselves good in the sight of the Lord, and to believe that he delighted in them, notwithstanding; and therefore, under pretence of making God not so severe as he was commonly represented, they said as they would have it, and thought he was altogether such a one as themselves. Note, Those who think God a friend to sin affront him and deceive themselves. 2. They had denied him to be the righteous governor of the world. If he did not delight in sin and sinners, yet it would serve their turn to believe that he would never punish it or them. They said, "Where is the God of judgment? That God who, we have been so often told, would call us to an account, and reckon with us for what we have said and done - where is he? He has forsaken the earth, and takes no notice of what is said and done there; he has said that he will come to judgment; but where is the promise of his coming? We may do what we please; he sees us not, nor will regard us." It is such a challenge to the Judge of the whole earth as bids defiance to his justice, and, in effect, dares him to do his worst. Such scoffers as these there were in the latter days of the Jewish church, and such there shall be in the latter days of the Christian church; but their unbelief shall not make the promise of God of no effect; for the day of the Lord will come. Behold, the Judge stands before the door; the God of judgment is at hand.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
And if you wish to see more clearly how utterly unlawful it is for a Christian woman to marry a Gentile, consider what the same apostle says, “A wife is bound for so long time as her husband lives. But if the husband be dead, she is freed to be married to whom she will, only in the Lord,” that is, to a Christian. The one who allows second and third marriages in the Lord forbids first marriages with a Gentile. Whence Abraham also makes his servant swear upon his thigh, that is, on Christ, who was to spring from his seed, that he would not bring an alien-born as a wife for his son Isaac. And Ezra checked an offense of this kind against God by making his countrymen put away their wives. And the prophet Malachi thus speaks, “Judah has dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah has profaned the holiness of the Lord which he loves and has married the daughter of a strange god. The Lord will cut off the man that does this, him that teaches and him that learns, out of the tents of Jacob, and him that offers an offering to the Lord of hosts.” I have said this that they who compare marriage with virginity may at least know that such marriages as these are on a lower level than digamy and trigamy.
(Verse 10 and following) Is not the Father one of us all? Is not God one who created us? Why then does each one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers? Judah has transgressed, and abomination has been made in Israel and in Jerusalem: because Judah has defiled the sanctification of the Lord, which he loved, and has taken the daughter of a foreign god. The Lord will destroy the man who does this, the master and the disciple from the tents of Jacob, and the one who offers an offering to the Lord of hosts. LXX: Is not the Father of you all one? Did not one God create you? Why have you each forsaken his brother, making the abominable testament of your fathers? Judas has been abandoned, and abomination has been made in Israel and in Jerusalem, because Judas defiled the holy things of the Lord, in which he loved, and he discovered foreign gods. May the Lord destroy the man who does these things, until he is driven out from the tents of Jacob, and from those who offer sacrifice to the Almighty Lord. Before we discuss the current chapter, the tradition of the Hebrews must be presented, indeed the truth of the Scriptures must be explained. We read in a volume titled Ezra, spoken in the person of Ezra himself: The leaders approached me, saying: The people of Israel, as well as the priests and Levites, have not separated themselves from the peoples of the lands and from their abominations, namely the Canaanites, Ethiopians, Persians, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, and Amorites. For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: and the holy seed is mixed with the people of those lands. Moreover the hand of the princes and magistrates hath been first in this transgression. And when I had heard this thing, I rent my mantle and my coat, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down mourning (1 Esdras 9:1). And again in the following: And there were found of the sons of the priests that had taken strange wives: of the sons of Jesus, the son of Josedec, and his brethren, Maasia, and Eleazar, and Jarib, and Godolia: and they gave their hands to put away their wives, and to offer for their offence a ram of the flock (1 Esdras 10:18-19). At the end of the chapter, after listing those who had taken foreign wives ((or had taken)), the Scripture states: All of these took foreign wives, and there were women among them who gave birth to sons. Therefore, upon their return from the Babylonian captivity, both the leaders, priests, and Levites, as well as the rest of the people, rejected their wives of Israelite descent, who, due to poverty and the injustice of a long journey, as well as the frailty of their gender, could not bear the labor and had become worn out, and had contracted physical weakness and deformity. And they had entered into matrimony with foreigners, who were either in the prime of life or possessed more attractive physical appearances, or were the daughters of the powerful and wealthy. So Ezra the prophet rebukes them and challenges them to reject their new wives and take back the wives they had divorced. He says, 'Is not Abraham our father? Didn't Isaiah write about him: Look to Abraham your father, and to Sarah, who bore you; for he was one, and I called him.' Isn't it one God who created us, who chose our lineage from Abraham? Why then do we despise our old wives and cast aside the daughters of our brothers, in order to abandon the covenant of our fathers and not take wives according to the Law? Juda transgressed (for this tribe alone returned from Babylon with the priests and Levites, and abomination was committed in Israel and in Jerusalem. Not from the ten tribes which were held by the Assyrians did this happen, but from those who returned under the authority of King Cyrus, Zerubbabel, Ezra, and Nehemiah from Babylon. Because Judah defiled the sanctification of the Lord, which he loved, and took a daughter of a foreign god, mixing Israel's seed with foreigners and the daughters of the nations, that is, with non-Israelite women who served idols, by marrying them. Therefore, the word of the prophets is directed towards them, and they are drawn away from sin by curses. May the Lord destroy the man who does this. How beautifully he does not pardon the error, nor does he say, 'May the Lord curse the one who did this,' but the one who does it, stretching the curse towards the future, in order to provoke sinners to repentance. The teacher, he says, the disciple from the tents of Jacob, whether he be a priest or a layperson, they shall be struck with the same curse, and there shall be no difference in punishment for those in whom the sins are equal. And the one offering a gift to the Lord of hosts: it is understood that the Lord will destroy him as well, who wishes to offer a gift at the altar for men of this kind, whose only remedy is not to do what they have done. Some, not understanding this passage, nor knowing the truth of history, understand what he says: 'Is not the father of us all one?' concerning Abraham, so as to also mention Abraham as the father of the Gentiles, according to what is written: 'God is able from these stones to raise up children of Abraham' (Matt. 3:9). Certainly they affirm one God the Father according to what we read in Deuteronomy: Is not this the same Father who possessed you, and made you, and created you (Deut. XXXII, 6)? And again: You have deserted the God who created you (Ibid., 18). And elsewhere: I have begotten sons and exalted them, but they have forsaken me (Isaiah I, 2). And in the Book of Psalms: The sons of strangers have lied to me: the sons of strangers have grown old and stumbled from their paths (Ps. XVII, 46). 964 From this one father, who sinned, departing, they made many fathers of their vices: For everyone who commits sin is born of the devil. And this is what follows: Therefore each one of us despises his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers, they interpreted it in such a way as to say: We who are all generated from one father ought to be one, and to have one confession of faith; but afterwards by pride and the building of the tower against God, they were divided into many languages and opinions (Gen. XI). They also refer to acts of charity, saying: Let us despise our brothers when we do not share with them what we have received from God for sustaining life. And they further allege that our brother is called Lord according to the Scriptures, who commanded Mary Magdalene to announce to his brothers that the Lord has risen (John 20), and he speaks in the Psalm: I will declare your name to my brothers, in the midst of the Church I will sing praise to you (Psalm 22:23). So the Jews deserted their brother and contaminated the covenant of their fathers, which God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, that in their descendants, who is interpreted as Christ, all the nations would be blessed. They suspect these things in various ways because they do not find a certain way. Finally, even this which follows according to the Septuagint: Judas has been forsaken, and abomination has been made in Israel and in Jerusalem, they explain thus: The Jews have been deserted because they have blasphemed the Lord Savior and have endured what is written: According to the multitude of their wickedness, drive them out, for they have provoked you, O Lord (Ps. 5:11), so that they would be scattered as wanderers and fugitives into all the provinces. For they have polluted the holy things of the Lord, being devoted to the Son of God, and approaching foreign gods: For whoever does not accept the Son, does not accept the Father who sent him (Luke IX, 43). And because they have done this, they will continue to be destroyed until they are humbled, either by the injustice of captivity, or by the guilt of their conscience: and they will be cast out from the tents of Jacob, so that with the temple and altar destroyed, no sacrifices may be offered among them (or by them). Not content with this explanation (because Judas is interpreted as the confession of the Lord), they transfer understanding to the penitent, who, after confessing the Lord, if he sins, commits an abomination in Israel, and in Jerusalem, in the sense of seeing God, and in the vision of peace. For he pollutes the mysteries of Christ, unworthily receiving his body and blood (I Cor. XI), because he loves vices and finds for himself foreign gods, having the number of gods according to the number of sins. According to the Apostle Paul: God is a voracious belly (Phil. III), and according to Peter (also James). Whoever is conquered by him, is subjected to him (II Petr. II, 19). And whoever does this, will be exterminated from the Church, and from the tents of Jacob, who supplants vices and sins, until he is humbled for his own good, and a victim is offered for him to the Almighty Lord.
Continue studying Malachi 2:11 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Malachi 2:11 delivers a severe prophetic indictment against the people of Judah, condemning their profound spiritual and social treachery. The verse highlights an "abomination" committed in Israel and Jerusalem: Judah's profanation of the Lord's holiness through intermarriage with those who worship foreign deities. This act of marrying "the daughter of a strange god" symbolized a deep betrayal of their covenant relationship with Yahweh, defiling their sacred identity and provoking divine displeasure.
Context
Literary Context
Malachi 2:11 is situated within a broader section (Malachi 2:10-16) where the prophet transitions from condemning the priests' unfaithfulness in worship and teaching (Malachi 1:6-2:9) to addressing the people's covenant breaking, particularly concerning marriage and divorce. The preceding verses lament the breaking of the "covenant of our fathers" and the defilement of God's sanctuary. This verse specifically identifies intermarriage with foreign women as a grave manifestation of this covenant betrayal, linking it directly to the profanation of God's sacred character and the sacred identity of Israel as His chosen people. The subsequent verses continue to condemn the treachery involved in divorcing Israelite wives to marry foreign women, reinforcing the theme of covenant fidelity in all aspects of life.
Historical & Cultural Context
The prophecy of Malachi is set in the post-exilic period, likely in the mid-5th century BCE, after the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylon. The community had rebuilt the Temple and re-established themselves in the land, but spiritual apathy and moral compromise quickly set in. Intermarriage with foreign peoples was a recurring problem throughout Israel's history, explicitly forbidden by Mosaic Law to prevent idolatry and preserve the purity of the covenant community (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4). This issue was a major concern for post-exilic leaders like Ezra and Nehemiah, who undertook drastic measures to address it, seeing it as a direct threat to Israel's spiritual survival and national identity (see Ezra 9 and Nehemiah 13:23-27). The "strange god" refers to the pagan deities worshipped by the surrounding nations, whose religious practices were antithetical to the monotheistic worship of Yahweh.
Key Themes
This verse powerfully encapsulates several key themes prevalent in Malachi and the broader prophetic tradition. Firstly, Covenant Betrayal is central, as Judah's actions are presented as a deliberate violation of their sacred covenant relationship with God, who had chosen them to be a holy nation set apart for Him. Secondly, the concept of Spiritual Abomination and Idolatry is highlighted, as marrying "the daughter of a strange god" directly symbolizes spiritual adultery and the adoption of idolatrous practices, which were detestable in God's sight (compare Deuteronomy 18:9-12). Thirdly, the Profanation of Holiness is a critical theme; by intermarrying and embracing foreign customs, Judah defiled the sacred character of God and their own identity as His holy people, whom the Lord "loved." Finally, the verse underscores Divine Displeasure and Judgment, revealing God's deep anger and righteous indignation over their unfaithfulness, which demonstrated a profound lack of respect for His commands and His unique relationship with them, echoing warnings found in passages like Leviticus 26.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This primitive root signifies to cover (with a garment); figuratively, to act covertly; by implication, to pillage. It conveys a profound act of betrayal, faithlessness, or disloyalty, often implying a breach of trust or covenant. In Malachi 2:11, it describes Judah's deliberate and insidious violation of their sacred bond with the Lord, acting in a way that was deceitful and unfaithful to their covenant obligations.
This root literally means "to bore" or "to wound," and by implication, "to dissolve." Figuratively, it means to profane, defile, or make common that which is sacred. It can also mean to begin, as if by an "opening wedge." Here, it indicates that Judah's actions, specifically their intermarriage, stripped away the sacredness and distinctiveness of God's holiness and the holy identity of His people, treating what was set apart as ordinary or defiled.
This word, derived from the noun "baal" (meaning "master" or "owner"), functions as a verb meaning "to be master" or "to own." Consequently, it means "to marry," implying the husband's mastery or ownership over his wife. In this context, it highlights the deliberate act of forming a marital union, emphasizing the choice Judah made to enter into a relationship with "the daughter of a strange god," thereby acknowledging and submitting to the influence of foreign deities.
Verse Breakdown
"Judah hath dealt treacherously"
This opening clause immediately establishes the core accusation. Judah, representing the covenant people, is charged with a profound act of betrayal against God. This treachery is not merely a mistake but a deliberate and faithless violation of the trust and covenant relationship God had established with them. It implies a deliberate turning away from loyalty and fidelity.
"and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem"
The consequence and nature of Judah's treachery are here defined as an "abomination" (Hebrew, tôwʻêbah'). This term denotes something utterly detestable, morally disgusting, and abhorrent to God, often associated with idolatry and pagan practices. Its commission "in Israel and in Jerusalem" signifies that this sin was widespread and affected the entire spiritual and political heart of the nation, indicating a systemic moral decay.
"for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved"
This clause explains how Judah's treachery constitutes an abomination. By their actions, they have "profaned" (made common or defiled) the very "holiness of the LORD." This refers to God's inherent, majestic purity, His absolute separateness from all sin and impurity, and the sacred character of His covenant relationship with Israel. The phrase "which he loved" underscores God's deep affection and commitment to His people and His holiness, making Judah's defilement all the more grievous.
"and hath married the daughter of a strange god"
This final clause provides the specific action that embodies Judah's treachery and profanation. "Marrying the daughter of a strange god" is a literal description of intermarriage with foreign women who worshipped pagan deities. Metaphorically, it represents spiritual adultery and syncretism—the blending of Yahweh worship with idolatrous practices. This act directly undermined the exclusive devotion required by the covenant and introduced corrupting influences into the holy community, thereby defiling God's name and His people.
Literary Devices
Malachi 2:11 employs several powerful literary devices to convey its message. Personification is evident in "Judah hath dealt treacherously," attributing a human action of betrayal to the entire nation, emphasizing corporate responsibility. The phrase "daughter of a strange god" functions as a potent metonymy or symbolism, where "daughter" stands for the foreign woman herself, and "strange god" represents the idolatrous system and pagan worldview she embodies. This creates a vivid image of spiritual impurity and the insidious nature of syncretism. The term "abomination" (Hebrew tôwʻêbah) is a form of hyperbole or strong, evocative language, highlighting the extreme detestability of the act in God's eyes. Furthermore, the verse utilizes contrast by juxtaposing Judah's unfaithfulness and profanation with "the holiness of the LORD which he loved," emphasizing the stark opposition between human sin and divine purity, and underscoring the gravity of defiling what is sacred to God.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Malachi 2:11 serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of God's holiness, the sanctity of the covenant, and the dangers of spiritual compromise. It underscores that God's holiness demands exclusive devotion and separation from anything that would defile His name or His people. The act of intermarriage, while seemingly a social issue, is presented as a theological one because it directly led to the adoption of foreign gods and practices, thus polluting the pure worship of Yahweh and breaking the covenant. This passage reveals God's deep pain and righteous anger over His people's unfaithfulness, demonstrating that true relationship with Him requires unwavering loyalty and a commitment to spiritual purity, not merely outward religious observance. It highlights that God's love for His people is intertwined with His expectation of their faithfulness and their preservation of the distinct identity He bestowed upon them.
Reflection and Application
Malachi 2:11, though rooted in ancient Israel's specific context, offers timeless spiritual warnings and profound calls to faithfulness for believers today. The "daughter of a strange god" can be understood metaphorically as any influence, philosophy, relationship, or pursuit that competes with or undermines our singular devotion to the Lord. Just as ancient Judah allowed worldly customs and idolatrous practices to infiltrate their sacred community, we too can be tempted to compromise our faith by embracing cultural norms, ideologies, or desires that are antithetical to God's truth and holiness. This verse challenges us to examine our loyalties, urging us to maintain spiritual purity and undivided allegiance to Christ. It reminds us that true holiness involves a conscious separation from anything that would profane God's name, dilute our witness, or draw our hearts away from His perfect will. Our commitment to God must be exclusive, reflecting His own unwavering love and faithfulness to us.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What does "the daughter of a strange god" literally mean in Malachi 2:11?
Literally, "the daughter of a strange god" refers to foreign women who worshipped pagan deities. In the post-exilic context of Malachi, the Jewish people had returned from Babylon and were forbidden by God's law to intermarry with the surrounding nations (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4). This prohibition was not based on ethnicity but on the religious and spiritual threat that such marriages posed. These foreign wives brought their idolatrous practices and beliefs into the Israelite community, thereby corrupting the pure worship of Yahweh and leading the people away from their covenant with Him. The phrase vividly portrays the spiritual danger and impurity associated with these forbidden alliances.
Why was intermarriage such a serious offense, described as an "abomination" and a "profanation of holiness"?
Intermarriage was considered a grave offense because it directly threatened the spiritual purity and distinct identity of Israel as God's chosen people. God had set Israel apart as a holy nation, a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation" (Exodus 19:6). Marrying those who worshipped "strange gods" inevitably led to syncretism—the blending of Yahweh worship with pagan idolatry—which was explicitly forbidden and seen as spiritual adultery. This act "profaned the holiness of the LORD" because it defiled the sacred covenant relationship, brought unholy influences into the community, and undermined the exclusive devotion God demanded. It was an "abomination" (tôwʻêbah) because it was morally disgusting and detestable in God's sight, a direct violation of His character and commands, and a betrayal of the unique love He had for His people.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Malachi 2:11, with its stark indictment of Judah's treachery and profanation through spiritual compromise, finds its ultimate resolution and fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The Old Covenant people repeatedly failed to maintain their purity and exclusive devotion to God, constantly "dealing treacherously" and marrying "the daughter of a strange god" through idolatry and syncretism. However, Jesus, the true Israel, perfectly embodies the faithfulness that Israel failed to uphold. He is the one who never "profaned the holiness of the LORD," but rather perfectly honored and revealed God's holy character (e.g., John 17:4). In the New Covenant, Christ accomplishes what Israel could not: He cleanses His people from their spiritual defilement. Through His atoning sacrifice, He takes away the "abomination" of our sin and makes us holy, setting us apart for God (e.g., Hebrews 9:14). Believers, now part of the Church, are called to be Christ's pure bride, without "spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she would be holy and blameless" (Ephesians 5:27). This calls us to a renewed commitment to spiritual purity and undivided loyalty, rejecting any "strange gods" or worldly compromises that would defile our relationship with Him, just as Paul urged the Corinthians to be presented as a "pure virgin to Christ" (2 Corinthians 11:2). Thus, Christ not only condemns the treachery but also provides the means for true holiness and unwavering faithfulness, making us a people truly set apart for the Lord whom He loves.