Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when he came to the tower, he took them from their hand, and bestowed them in the house: and he let the men go, and they departed.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when he came H935 to the tower H6076, he took H3947 them from their hand H3027, and bestowed H6485 them in the house H1004: and he let the men H582 go H7971, and they departed H3212.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
On reaching the hill, he took the bags from them and put them away in the house. Then he let the men go, and they left.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
When Gehazi came to the hill, he took the gifts from the servants and stored them in the house. Then he dismissed the men, and they departed.
Ask
American Standard Version
And when he came to the hill, he took them from their hand, and bestowed them in the house; and he let the men go, and they departed.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When he came to the hill, he took them from their hand, and stored them in the house. Then he let the men go, and they departed.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when he came to the towre, he tooke them out of their handes, and laide them in the house, and sent away the men: and they departed.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he cometh in unto the high place, and taketh out of their hand, and layeth up in the house, and sendeth away the men, and they go.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,672 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

2 Kings 5:24 meticulously details Gehazi's surreptitious actions immediately following his deceitful pursuit of Naaman. Having illicitly acquired gifts by fabricating a story to Naaman, Gehazi returns to the vicinity of Elisha's dwelling. This verse describes his calculated efforts to conceal the ill-gotten gains, bringing them to a secluded "tower" or hidden place, then carefully storing them within the house, and finally dismissing Naaman's servants to eliminate any potential witnesses. This deliberate act of concealment underscores his profound guilt and sets the stage for the inevitable exposure of his sin and the severe divine judgment that swiftly follows.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse represents the pivotal moment of Gehazi's personal narrative within the larger account of Naaman's miraculous healing and Elisha's prophetic ministry. Earlier in the chapter, Naaman, a prominent Syrian commander, was miraculously cured of leprosy by faithfully following Elisha's seemingly simple instruction to wash seven times in the Jordan River. Overwhelmed with profound gratitude, Naaman offered Elisha lavish gifts, but the prophet steadfastly refused, emphasizing that God's power and grace are freely given and cannot be bought or sold, a principle powerfully articulated in 2 Kings 5:15-16. However, Gehazi, Elisha's trusted servant, driven by unchecked covetousness, secretly pursued Naaman. He fabricated a deceptive story, claiming Elisha suddenly needed two talents of silver and two changes of garments for two young prophets who had supposedly just arrived, as vividly depicted in 2 Kings 5:21. Naaman, still deeply grateful, not only granted his request but insisted on providing double the silver, even sending two of his servants to help carry the substantial load. Verse 24 then describes Gehazi's calculated return, where he meticulously hides his newly acquired wealth before facing his master, thereby revealing his deliberate intent to deceive and conceal his transgression.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, the exchange of gifts was a deeply embedded practice, serving as a crucial aspect of diplomatic relations, expressions of profound gratitude, and displays of honor. Naaman's generous offer to Elisha was entirely culturally appropriate as a token of immense thanks for his miraculous healing. However, Elisha's resolute refusal, which Gehazi audaciously undermines, served as a powerful theological statement, sharply distinguishing the true God's sovereign and free grace from the transactional nature of pagan worship or human-driven magic. Prophets like Elisha typically had trusted servants, who were expected to embody the integrity, moral purity, and values of their masters. Gehazi's actions thus represent a significant cultural and spiritual breach of trust, not only against Elisha but against the very nature of prophetic ministry. The "tower" mentioned in the verse (Hebrew: ʻôphel) could refer to a common architectural feature of the time—a watchtower, a fortified dwelling, or even a secluded outbuilding or elevated mound on the property—providing a discreet and strategic location for Gehazi to manage the heavy load of silver and garments away from immediate observation, highlighting his careful planning to ensure absolute secrecy.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes within the book of 2 Kings and the broader prophetic narrative. Firstly, it starkly highlights the destructive nature of deception and secrecy. Gehazi's elaborate efforts to hide his illicit gains underscore his profound guilt and deep-seated fear of exposure, directly contrasting with the transparency and integrity expected of a prophet's servant. Secondly, the entire episode serves as a potent illustration of greed and covetousness. Gehazi's overwhelming desire for material wealth stands in sharp opposition to Elisha's selfless refusal of gifts, emphasizing the profound spiritual danger of prioritizing personal gain over divine principles, a theme powerfully echoed in the commandment against coveting found in Exodus 20:17. Finally, Gehazi's actions of meticulous concealment in this verse function as a potent foreshadowing of inevitable consequences. While he believes his actions are hidden from human eyes, the narrative implicitly assures the reader that divine knowledge penetrates all secrets, setting the stage for the unavoidable exposure of his sin and the severe divine judgment pronounced by Elisha in 2 Kings 5:27.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Tower (Hebrew, ʻôphel', H6076): This term (עֹפֶל, H6076) refers to a tumor, but also a mound, i.e., a fortress or strong hold, often an elevated or fortified place. In this context, it likely denotes a specific, perhaps less visible, location near Elisha's dwelling, such as an outbuilding, a secluded part of the property, or even a designated storage area on elevated ground. Its mention emphasizes Gehazi's deliberate choice of a discreet spot to unload and manage the heavy gifts, highlighting his meticulous planning to avoid immediate detection by Elisha or others. It suggests a place where he could momentarily be out of sight before bringing the items into the main house.
  • Took (Hebrew, lâqach', H3947): The verb "took" (לָקַח, H3947) is a primitive root meaning "to take" in the widest variety of applications, including to accept, fetch, get, or seize. Here, it denotes Gehazi's active reception and assumption of possession of the gifts from Naaman's servants. This action marks the moment Gehazi fully commits to his deceptive plan, physically taking control of the illicit gains, thereby solidifying his complicity and setting the stage for their concealment.
  • Bestowed (Hebrew, pâqad', H6485): The verb "bestowed" (פָּקַד, H6485) comes from a primitive root meaning to visit (with friendly or hostile intent), but by analogy, also to oversee, muster, charge, care for, miss, or deposit. In this specific context, it signifies a deliberate and careful act of placing or hiding the items. It is not a casual dropping but a purposeful arrangement, further emphasizing Gehazi's intent to securely conceal the gifts within the house, away from prying eyes, especially Elisha's. This verb choice underscores the premeditated and calculated nature of his deception.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when he came to the tower,": This phrase marks Gehazi's return from his pursuit of Naaman, indicating his arrival at a specific, pre-determined, and likely secluded location near Elisha's home. The "tower" serves as a strategic waypoint, a place where he can discreetly handle the heavy load of silver and garments before bringing them into the main dwelling, thus avoiding immediate scrutiny from anyone at the house.
  • "he took [them] from their hand,": This refers to Gehazi taking the two talents of silver and two changes of garments from the two servants whom Naaman had sent with him. This action signifies Gehazi's assumption of full control over the illicit gains, relieving Naaman's servants of the burden and preparing to manage the concealment himself, ensuring no one else could directly link the gifts to him upon his return to Elisha.
  • "and bestowed [them] in the house:": This is the core act of concealment. Gehazi deliberately and carefully placed or hid the silver and garments within Elisha's house. This act demonstrates his intent to keep his acquisition secret from Elisha, believing he could successfully hide his sin within the very place of prophetic integrity and divine presence.
  • "and he let the men go, and they departed.": By dismissing Naaman's servants, Gehazi eliminates any potential witnesses to his clandestine actions and the presence of the gifts. This final step in his meticulous plan ensures that no one else could report his movements or the presence of the gifts to Elisha, reinforcing his desire for absolute secrecy and his attempt to control the narrative of his return.

Literary Devices

The narrative of 2 Kings 5:24 employs several potent literary devices to heighten its dramatic impact and convey its theological message. Irony is profoundly present, as Gehazi meticulously attempts to hide his ill-gotten gains from Elisha, yet the omniscient reader is acutely aware that Elisha, through divine revelation, already knows or will very soon know every detail of Gehazi's actions. Gehazi's efforts to conceal are ultimately futile in the face of God's perfect knowledge. This verse also functions as a strong piece of Foreshadowing, building palpable tension and anticipation for the inevitable exposure of Gehazi's sin and the severe divine judgment that will swiftly follow in 2 Kings 5:27. The very act of hiding implies a fear of discovery, which indeed comes to pass in a dramatic and public manner. Furthermore, there is a powerful Contrast established between Elisha's selfless integrity in steadfastly refusing Naaman's gifts and Gehazi's covetous deceit. This stark contrast highlights the moral and spiritual chasm between the true prophet of God, who embodies divine principles, and his compromised servant, emphasizing the purity and integrity required in divine service.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Kings 5:24 serves as a potent theological lesson on the futility of hidden sin and the pervasive nature of divine knowledge. Gehazi's meticulous efforts to conceal his ill-gotten gains underscore the universal human tendency to believe that actions performed in secret can escape consequence or detection. However, the biblical narrative consistently affirms that nothing is hidden from God; His eyes are everywhere, observing the wicked and the good. This verse highlights the destructive power of covetousness, which, when left unchecked, inevitably leads to deception, betrayal of trust, and ultimately, severe judgment. It reinforces the profound principle that while humans may attempt to hide their transgressions from others, or even from themselves, God sees and knows all. The story of Gehazi stands as a timeless warning against the deceptive allure of material wealth gained through dishonest means, and a powerful reminder that true integrity involves living transparently before both God and humanity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Gehazi's story in 2 Kings 5:24 offers profound and timeless lessons for contemporary believers. His meticulous efforts to hide his sin—the secret meeting, the careful stowing away of goods, the dismissal of witnesses—mirror the insidious ways we often attempt to conceal our own compromises, greed, or dishonest actions from others and, perhaps, even from ourselves. This verse powerfully reminds us that such efforts are ultimately futile, especially in the all-seeing eyes of an omniscient God. It calls us to a radical transparency and unwavering integrity in all areas of our lives, recognizing that true freedom and peace come not from successfully hiding our misdeeds, but from humbly confessing them, seeking God's forgiveness, and allowing His Spirit to transform our hearts. Gehazi's covetousness led him down a treacherous path of deceit and spiritual compromise, demonstrating how unchecked desires can corrupt our character and lead to devastating, long-lasting consequences. We are challenged to cultivate profound contentment, to trust implicitly in God's faithful provision, and to prioritize spiritual integrity and a pure heart over fleeting material gain, understanding that our true and lasting wealth lies in our intimate relationship with God, not in earthly possessions.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to act in secret, believing my actions will go unnoticed by God or others?
  • How does Gehazi's covetousness serve as a potent warning against the dangers of unchecked desire for material wealth in my own life and the lives of those around me?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate greater transparency, honesty, and integrity in my daily interactions and decisions, both public and private?
  • How does the profound knowledge of God's omniscience (that He sees and knows everything) impact my motivation for righteous living and my pursuit of holiness?

FAQ

Why did Gehazi go to a "tower" to unload the gifts?

Answer: Gehazi went to a "tower" (Hebrew: ʻôphel, H6076) to unload the gifts because it provided a secluded and discreet location away from the immediate view of Elisha's main dwelling. This was a deliberate tactical move to ensure secrecy and avoid detection. The "tower" could have been an outbuilding, a watchtower on the property, or simply a less visible, elevated spot where he could handle the heavy load of silver and garments without attracting attention. His primary goal was to manage the illicit gains privately before bringing them into the house, thereby eliminating any witnesses or immediate discovery by Elisha. This action underscores his premeditated intent to deceive his master and carefully hide his sin.

What was the significance of Gehazi hiding the gifts "in the house"?

Answer: Hiding the gifts "in the house" signifies Gehazi's attempt to fully integrate his illicit gains into his personal possessions and conceal them within what should have been a place of integrity, prophetic purity, and divine presence. This act reveals his deep-seated covetousness and his misguided belief that he could successfully hide his transgression from Elisha. It contrasts sharply with Elisha's earlier selfless refusal of Naaman's gifts, highlighting Gehazi's profound betrayal of the prophetic standard and the trust placed in him. The profound irony is that while he successfully hid them from human eyes for a brief period, his actions and motives were fully known to God, leading to his eventual exposure and severe punishment in 2 Kings 5:27.

How does this verse foreshadow Gehazi's ultimate punishment?

Answer: 2 Kings 5:24 powerfully foreshadows Gehazi's ultimate punishment by emphasizing his deliberate and meticulous acts of concealment and deceit. His careful efforts to hide the silver and garments, coupled with his dismissal of Naaman's servants, vividly reveal his profound guilt and his deep-seated fear of discovery. This meticulous attempt to cover up his sin sets up the dramatic revelation that follows, where Elisha, by divine insight and prophetic revelation, exposes Gehazi's every step and every thought, as seen in 2 Kings 5:25-26. The very act of hiding implies a truth that needs to be concealed, and the narrative powerfully demonstrates that no secret can be kept from an omniscient God. Thus, Gehazi's careful concealment in this verse directly anticipates the divine judgment that brings his hidden sin into the light, resulting in him being afflicted with Naaman's leprosy, as detailed in 2 Kings 5:27.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Gehazi's tragic failure in 2 Kings 5:24, marked by unchecked covetousness, calculated deceit, and the futile attempt to hide sin, stands in stark and illuminating contrast to the perfect integrity, radical selflessness, and transparent holiness of Jesus Christ. While Gehazi sought personal gain and earthly treasures, even at the cost of his spiritual calling and integrity, Christ, though eternally rich in glory and divine majesty, for our sake became poor, so that by his voluntary poverty we might become spiritually rich, as beautifully articulated in 2 Corinthians 8:9. Gehazi's actions exemplify the fallen human tendency to grasp, hoard, and deceive for material benefit, but Jesus consistently taught against the fleeting pursuit of earthly treasures, where moth and rust destroy, encouraging instead the eternal laying up of treasures in heaven (Matthew 6:19-20). Furthermore, Gehazi's desperate attempt to hide his sin from Elisha, a man of God, highlights the pervasive nature of sin and its inherent desire for darkness and concealment. Yet, Christ is the very light of the world, who came not to hide sin but to expose it and offer true freedom and forgiveness to all who walk in His glorious light (John 8:12; John 3:19-21). Unlike Gehazi, who served for personal profit and self-aggrandizement, Jesus came not to be served but to serve, and to give His very life as a ransom for many (Matthew 20:28). His life perfectly fulfills the standard of integrity, self-sacrificial love, and divine transparency that Gehazi so tragically failed to uphold, offering a new covenant where believers are called to purity of heart and a life lived openly and honestly before God and man (Matthew 5:8).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 5 verses 20–27

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Naaman, a Syrian, a courtier, a soldier, had many servants, and we read how wise and good they were, Kg2 5:13. Elisha, a holy prophet, a man of God, has but one servant, and he proves a base, lying, naughty fellow. Those that heard of Elisha at a distance honoured him, and got good by what they heard; but he that stood continually before him, to hear his wisdom, had no good impressions made upon him either by his doctrine or miracles. One would have expected that Elisha's servant should be a saint (even Ahab's servant, Obadiah, was), but even Christ himself had a Judas among his followers. The means of grace cannot give grace. The best men, the best ministers have often had those about them that have been their grief and shame. The nearer the church the further from God. Many come from the east and west to sit down with Abraham when the children of the kingdom shall be cast out. Here is,

I. Gehazi's sin. It was a complicated sin. 1. The love of money, that root of all evil, was at the bottom of it. His master contemned Naaman's treasures, but he coveted them, Kg2 5:20. His heart (says bishop Hall) was packed up in Naaman's chests, and he must run after him to fetch it. Multitudes, by coveting worldly wealth, have erred from the faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows. 2. He blamed his master for refusing Naaman's present, condemned him as foolish in not taking gold when he might have it, envied and grudged his kindness and generosity to this stranger, though it was for the good of his soul. In short, he thought himself wiser than his master. 3. When Naaman, like a person of accomplished manners, alighted from his chariot to meet him (Kg2 5:21), he told him a deliberate lie, that his master sent him to him, and so he received that courtesy to himself that Naaman intended to his master. 4. He abused his master, and basely misrepresented him to Naaman as one that had soon repented of his generosity, that was fickle, and did not know his own mind, that would say and unsay, swear and unswear, that would not do an honourable thing but he must presently undo it again. his story of the two sons of the prophets was as silly as it was false; if he would have begged a token for two young scholars, surely less than a talent of silver might serve them. 5. There was danger of his alienating Naaman from that holy religion which he had espoused, and lessening his good opinion of it. he would be ready to say, as Paul's enemies suggested concerning him (Co2 12:16, Co2 12:17), that, though Elisha himself did not burden him, yet being crafty he caught him with guile, sending those that made a gain of him. We hope that he understood afterwards that Elisha's hand was not in it, and that Gehazi was forced to restore what he had unjustly got, else it might have driven him to his idols again. 6. His seeking to conceal what he had unjustly got added much to his sin. (1.) He hid it, as Achan did his gain, by sacrilege, in the tower, a secret place, a strong place, till he should have an opportunity of laying it out, Kg2 5:24. Now he thought himself sure of it, and applauded his own management of a fraud by which he had imposed, not only upon the prudence of Naaman, but upon Elisha's spirit of discerning, as Ananias and Sapphira upon the apostles. (2.) He denied it: He went in, and stood before his master, ready to receive his orders. None looked more observant of his master, though really none more injurious to him; he thought, as Ephraim, I have become rich, but they shall find no iniquity in me, Hos 12:8. His master asked him where he had been, "Nowhere, sir" (said he), "out of the house." Note, One lie commonly begets another: the way of that sin is down-hill; therefore dare to be true.

II. The punishment of this sin. Elisha immediately called him to an account for it; and observe,

1.How he was convicted. he thought to impose upon the prophet, but was soon given to understand that the Spirit of prophecy could not be deceived, and that it was in vain to lie to the Holy Ghost. Elisha could tell him, (1.) What he had done, though he had denied it. "Thou sayest thou wentest nowhere, but went not my heart with thee?" Kg2 5:26. Had Gehazi yet to learn that prophets had spiritual eyes? or could he think to hide any thing from a seer, from him with whom the secret of the Lord was? Note, It is folly to presume upon sin in hopes of secresy. When thou goest aside into any by-path does not thy own conscience go with thee? Does not the eye of God go with thee? He that covers his sin shall not prosper, particularly a lying tongue is but for a moment, Pro 12:19. Truth will transpire, and often comes to light strangely, to the confusion of those that make lies their refuge. (2.) What he designed, though he kept that in his own breast. He could tell him the very thoughts and intents of his heart, that he was projecting, now that he had got these two talents, to purchase ground and cattle, to leave Elisha's service, and to set up for himself. Note, All the foolish hopes and contrivances of carnal worldlings are open before God. And he tells him also the evil of it: "Is it a time to receive money? Is this an opportunity of enriching thyself? Couldst thou find no better way of getting money than by belying thy master and laying a stumbling-block before a young convert?" Note, Those that are for getting wealth at any time, and by any ways and means whatsoever, right or wrong, lay themselves open to a great deal of temptation. Those that will be rich (per fas, per nefas; rem, rem, quocunque modo rem - by fair means, by foul means; careless of principle, intent only on money) drown themselves in destruction and perdition, Ti1 6:9. War, and fire, and plague, and shipwreck, are not, as many make them, things to get money by. It is not a time to increase our wealth when we cannot do it but in such ways as are dishonourable to God and religion or injurious to our brethren or the public.

2.How he was punished for it: The leprosy of Naaman shall cleave to thee, Kg2 5:27. If he will have his money, he shall take his disease with it, Transit cum onere - It passes with this incumbrance. He was contriving to entail lands upon his posterity; but, instead of them, he entails a loathsome disease on the heirs of his body, from generation to generation. The sentence was immediately executed on himself; no sooner said than done: He went out from his presence a leper as white as snow. Thus he is stigmatized and made infamous, and carries the mark of his shame wherever he goes: thus he loads himself and family with a curse, which shall not only for the present proclaim his villany, but for ever perpetuate the remembrance of it. Note, The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of those that seek death, Pro 21:6. Those who get wealth by fraud and injustice cannot expect either the comfort or the continuance of it. What was Gehazi profited, though he gained his two talents, when thereby he lost his health, his honour, his peace, his service, and, if repentance prevented not, his soul for ever? See Job 20:12, etc.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 5:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.