See on the biblical-era map


Study This Verse
Commentary on 2 Kings 15 verses 32–38
We have here a short account of the reign of Jotham king of Judah, of whom we are told, 1. That he reigned very well, did that which was right in the sight of the Lord, Kg2 15:34. Josephus gives him a very high character, stating that he was pious towards God, just towards men, and laid out himself for the public good, - that, whatever was amiss, he took care to have it rectified, - and, in short, wanted no virtue that became a good prince. Though the high places were not taken away, yet to draw people from them, and keep them close to God's holy place, he showed great respect to the temple, and built the higher gate which he went through to the temple. If magistrates cannot do all they would for the suppressing of vice and profaneness, let them do so much the more for the support and advancement of piety and virtue, and the bringing of them into reputation. If they cannot pull down the high places of sin, yet let them build and beautify the high gate of God's house. 2. That he died in the midst of his days, Kg2 15:33. Of most of the kings of Judah we are told how old they were when they began their reign, and by that may compute how old they were when they died; but no account is kept of the age of any of the kings of Israel that I remember, only of the years of their reigns. This honour God would put upon the kings of the house of David above those of other families. And by these accounts it appears that there was none of all the kings of Judah that reached David's age, seventy, the common age of man. Asa's age I do not find. Uzziah lived to be sixty-eight, Manasseh sixty-seven, and Jehoshaphat sixty; and these were the three oldest; many of those that were of note did not reach fifty. This Jotham died at forty-one. He was too great a blessing to be continued long to such an unworthy people. His death was a judgment, especially considering the character of his son and successor. 3. That in his days the confederacy was formed against Judah by Rezin and Remaliah's son, the king of Syria and the king of Israel, which appeared so very formidable in the beginning of the reign of Ahaz that, upon notice of it, the heart of that prince was moved and the heart of the people, as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind, Isa 7:2. The confederates were unjust in the attempt, yet it is here said (Kg2 15:37), The Lord began to send them against Judah, as he bade Shimei curse David, and took away from Job what the Sabeans robbed him of. Men are God's hand - the sword, the rod in his hand - which he makes use of as he pleases to serve his own righteous counsels, though men be unrighteous in their intentions. This storm gathered in the reign of pious Jotham, but he came to his grave in peace and it fell upon his degenerate son.
“In the second year of King Pekah son of Remaliah of Israel, King Jotham son of Uzziah of Judah began to reign.” After rising to power in that year, Jotham administered the government [of Judah] for sixteen years, earning great praise. While the second book of the Annals has shown all the feats illustriously accomplished by him, the Scripture never reproaches him in this passage for any error, except for his toleration of the high places, which was a fault common to all the most praised kings of Judah. In the first place, he strengthened Jerusalem with new fortifications and built towers and castles in desert places. He conquered the Ammonites, who were perpetual enemies of the Jews, and ordered them for the future to pay the kings of Judah an annual tribute.
Continue studying 2 Kings 15:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Second Kings 15:35 offers a succinct yet profound assessment of King Jotham's reign in Judah, highlighting a paradox typical of many otherwise righteous kings: his commendable efforts in fortifying the Jerusalem Temple contrasted sharply with his failure to eradicate the pervasive and compromising practice of worship at the "high places." This verse underscores a persistent spiritual struggle within Judah, where official piety coexisted with unauthorized worship, revealing a deep-seated popular adherence to practices that diluted exclusive devotion to Yahweh.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs Juxtaposition as its primary literary device, placing Jotham's failure to remove the high places in direct contrast with his initiative to build the "higher gate of the house of the LORD." This sharp contrast underscores the king's paradoxical reign: a commitment to the physical structure of legitimate worship coexisting with a tolerance for unauthorized spiritual practices. Furthermore, the mention of "high places" serves as a Repetition of a recurring motif throughout the Deuteronomistic history, signaling a persistent spiritual problem that kings were repeatedly challenged, and often failed, to address. This repetition emphasizes the chronic nature of Judah's spiritual compromise. There is also a subtle Irony at play: a king praised for doing "right in the sight of the LORD" nevertheless permits a practice explicitly condemned by divine law, revealing the complexities and compromises inherent in human leadership.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The account of King Jotham in 2 Kings 15:35 offers profound theological insights into the nature of obedience, spiritual compromise, and the challenge of radical reform. It reveals that outward acts of piety, even significant ones like Temple construction, do not negate the necessity of addressing deeper, systemic spiritual impurities. The persistence of the high places, despite the presence of generally righteous kings, underscores the pervasive nature of human sin and the difficulty of uprooting deeply entrenched cultural and religious practices that deviate from God's revealed will. This narrative serves as a timeless warning against partial obedience, illustrating that God desires wholehearted, exclusive devotion, not merely adherence to certain aspects of His command while neglecting others. It highlights the constant tension between God's ideal for His people and their persistent inclination towards syncretism and self-devised worship.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
King Jotham's story in 2 Kings 15:35 serves as a potent mirror for contemporary believers, challenging us to examine the areas of our lives where we might exhibit partial obedience or tolerate spiritual compromise. It's easy to focus on outward expressions of faith—attending church, serving in ministry, giving financially—our "higher gates" that are commendable and visible. Yet, this verse compels us to ask if we are simultaneously neglecting our "high places"—those hidden areas of our hearts or habits where we allow competing loyalties, unconfessed sin, or diluted devotion to persist. True spiritual health demands a radical, comprehensive commitment to God's will, not just in the public sphere but in the private corners of our lives. We are called to be vigilant against syncretism, not just with pagan gods, but with the idols of materialism, self-reliance, comfort, or approval that subtly erode our exclusive devotion to Christ. Jotham's failure reminds us that even good intentions and visible acts of piety are insufficient if we fail to actively dismantle anything that competes with God's rightful place as supreme in our lives.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What exactly were "high places" and why were they a problem?
Answer: "High places" (Hebrew: bamot) were elevated sites, often hills or constructed mounds, used for religious worship. While some may have been used for legitimate Yahwistic worship in earlier periods (e.g., 1 Samuel 9:12), they became problematic after the establishment of the central Temple in Jerusalem. God commanded centralized worship at the Temple in Deuteronomy 12. The high places were a problem because they often led to syncretism (mixing Yahwistic worship with pagan practices), encouraged idolatry, and undermined the exclusive, centralized worship of Yahweh, fostering a diluted and unauthorized form of devotion.
Did all "good" kings fail to remove the high places?
Answer: No, not all. While many righteous kings, like Asa (1 Kings 15:14), Jehoshaphat (1 Kings 22:43), and Jotham, are noted for failing to remove them, there were exceptions. King Hezekiah (2 Kings 18:4) and King Josiah (2 Kings 23:8) are explicitly praised for their thorough reforms, which included the destruction of the high places, demonstrating a more complete obedience to God's commands.
What is the significance of Jotham building "the higher gate of the house of the LORD" in contrast to the high places?
Answer: This detail highlights a striking juxtaposition in Jotham's reign. Building or improving a gate of the Jerusalem Temple, the legitimate center of Yahwistic worship, was a commendable act of piety and dedication to God's house. It demonstrated his zeal for official, centralized worship. However, this positive action is immediately contrasted with his failure to remove the high places, which represented unauthorized, decentralized, and often syncretistic worship. The contrast underscores that outward acts of religious devotion, while good, do not excuse or compensate for a lack of comprehensive obedience in other areas, particularly concerning the purity of worship and the eradication of spiritual compromise.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The narrative of King Jotham, caught between commendable outward piety and a failure to eradicate deep-seated spiritual compromise, finds its ultimate resolution and fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The "high places" represent humanity's persistent inclination to worship God on our own terms, in our own chosen places, often mixing truth with human tradition or self-serving practices, rather than in the way God has prescribed. This reflects the universal problem of idolatry and partial obedience. Jesus, however, is the perfect King who completely fulfills God's will, demonstrating absolute and unblemished obedience, even unto death on the cross (Philippians 2:8). He did not merely build a "higher gate" to the house of the Lord; He himself is the true "gate" and the "way" to God, through whom all genuine worship and access to the Father is made possible (John 10:9 and John 14:6). Furthermore, Jesus did not tolerate any "high places" in His ministry or teaching; He consistently called for worship "in spirit and in truth," transcending geographical locations and demanding complete devotion of the heart (John 4:23-24). Through His perfect sacrifice, He cleansed the true temple—His own body and, by extension, the church—removing the spiritual "high places" of sin, self-righteousness, and false worship, making true and uncompromised communion with God possible for all who believe (Hebrews 10:19-22). Thus, where Jotham's reign revealed a persistent spiritual struggle, Christ's work offers complete victory and the path to unreserved, pure devotion.