Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Hath not the same Hezekiah taken away his high places and his altars, and commanded Judah and Jerusalem, saying, Ye shall worship before one altar, and burn incense upon it?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Hath not the same Hezekiah H3169 taken away H5493 his high places H1116 and his altars H4196, and commanded H559 Judah H3063 and Jerusalem H3389, saying H559, Ye shall worship H7812 before H6440 one H259 altar H4196, and burn incense H6999 upon it?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Isn't this the same Hizkiyahu who removed [your God's] high places and altars and ordered Y'hudah and Yerushalayim to worship before one altar and offer sacrifices only on it?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Did not Hezekiah himself remove His high places and His altars and say to Judah and Jerusalem, ‘You must worship before one altar, and on it you shall burn sacrifices’?
Ask
American Standard Version
Hath not the same Hezekiah taken away his high places and his altars, and commanded Judah and Jerusalem, saying, Ye shall worship before one altar, and upon it shall ye burn incense?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Hasn’t the same Hezekiah taken away his high places and his altars, and commanded Judah and Jerusalem, saying, ‘You shall worship before one altar, and on it you shall burn incense?’
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Hath not the same Hezekiah taken away his hie places and his altars, and commanded Iudah and Ierusalem, saying, Ye shall worshippe before one altar, and burne incense vpon it?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Hath not Hezekiah himself turned aside His high places, and His altars, and speaketh to Judah and to Jerusalem, saying, Before one altar ye bow yourselves, and on it ye make perfume?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Hezekiah and Sennacherib
Hezekiah and Sennacherib View full PDF
Hezekiah Purifies the Temple
Hezekiah Purifies the Temple View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 11,888 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse captures the audacious taunt of the Assyrian field commander, Rabshakeh, during Sennacherib's siege of Jerusalem. He accuses King Hezekiah of offending his God by removing local "high places" and altars, consolidating worship to a single altar in Jerusalem. Intended to undermine Judah's faith and loyalty, this accusation ironically highlights Hezekiah's righteous reforms, which were, in fact, acts of obedience to Yahweh's covenant commands for centralized and pure worship. The Assyrians, operating from a polytheistic worldview, fundamentally misunderstood the unique nature of Israel's God and the principles of true worship, believing that Hezekiah's fidelity was an act of sacrilege.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within Sennacherib's psychological warfare against Jerusalem, as vividly detailed in 2 Chronicles 32:9-19. Following Hezekiah's initial preparations for defense and his encouragement to the people in 2 Chronicles 32:1-8, Sennacherib dispatches his officials, including Rabshakeh, to demoralize the inhabitants of Jerusalem. Rabshakeh's speeches are meticulously designed to sow doubt in Hezekiah's leadership and, more critically, in the power and faithfulness of Judah's God. This specific taunt directly challenges Hezekiah's religious reforms, attempting to convince the people that their king's actions have alienated their deity, thereby making their dire situation a divine punishment rather than a test of faith. It sets the stage for Hezekiah's desperate prayer and God's miraculous intervention, culminating in the dramatic deliverance recorded in 2 Chronicles 32:20-22.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events unfold around 701 BC, during the reign of King Hezekiah in Judah and King Sennacherib of Assyria. The Assyrian Empire was the dominant superpower of the ancient Near East, renowned for its brutal military campaigns and effective psychological tactics aimed at demoralizing besieged populations. Their worldview was inherently polytheistic, believing in a pantheon of gods associated with specific nations, places, or natural phenomena. From this perspective, removing local altars would be perceived as an act of disrespect or limitation towards a deity, potentially angering it and leading to national misfortune. They could not comprehend the concept of a single, transcendent God who commanded exclusive worship at a single, designated location—the Temple in Jerusalem—as stipulated in the Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 12:5-7). Hezekiah's reforms, which included the destruction of "high places" (bamot) and the centralization of worship, were a direct response to this Mosaic command and an effort to purify Judah from syncretistic practices that had plagued the nation for centuries.
  • Key Themes:
    • Misunderstanding of True Worship: Sennacherib's accusation vividly illustrates a profound ignorance of the God of Israel. While he perceived Hezekiah's removal of altars as an act of impiety that would provoke divine wrath, Hezekiah's actions were, in fact, acts of profound obedience to God's command for centralized and exclusive worship at the Temple in Jerusalem. This highlights the stark contrast between polytheistic, localized worship and the monotheistic, covenantal worship of Yahweh, as mandated in Deuteronomy 12.
    • Righteous Reform: Hezekiah's reign was a pivotal period of spiritual revival and a return to covenant fidelity. His systematic removal of the "high places" (unauthorized local shrines often used for syncretistic worship, mixing Yahweh worship with pagan practices) and his insistence on worship at the Jerusalem Temple were crucial steps in purifying the worship of God in Judah. This commitment to reform is well-documented in passages like 2 Kings 18:4 and 2 Chronicles 29:3-19.
    • The Enemy's Deception: This verse serves as a powerful example of how adversaries often twist truth, misrepresent righteous actions, or sow doubt and fear to achieve their objectives. Rabshakeh's taunt was strategically designed to make the people believe that Hezekiah's piety was the cause of their suffering, rather than the path to their salvation, thereby attempting to break their morale and trust in God's protection. This tactic of deception is a recurring theme in the biblical narrative, often seen in the spiritual warfare described throughout Scripture.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • High places (Hebrew, bâmâh', H1116): From an unused root meaning "to be high," this term refers to elevated places or shrines, often built on hills or mounds, where religious rituals and sacrifices were performed. While some might have been dedicated to Yahweh, many were associated with Canaanite idolatry or unauthorized worship that deviated from the Mosaic Law's command for a single, central place of worship. Hezekiah's destruction of these was an act of covenant faithfulness, aimed at purifying Judah's religious practices.
  • One (Hebrew, ʼechâd', H259): This numeral, meaning "united" or "one," emphasizes the singularity and exclusivity of the altar. In the context of the Mosaic Law, it underscores the principle of monotheistic worship—the worship of the one true God, Yahweh—at His one designated sanctuary, the Temple in Jerusalem. Rabshakeh's mention of "one altar" inadvertently highlights the unique, non-polytheistic nature of Israel's faith.
  • Altar (Hebrew, mizbêach', H4196): Derived from a root meaning "to sacrifice," this word denotes a structure upon which sacrifices were offered to a deity. In this verse, it refers both to the illegitimate altars on the "high places" that Hezekiah removed and, crucially, to the single, legitimate altar of burnt offering located within the Jerusalem Temple. The contrast between the multiplicity of pagan altars and the singularity of Yahweh's altar is central to the theological conflict.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Hath not the same Hezekiah taken away his high places and his altars": This rhetorical question, posed by Rabshakeh, is framed as an accusation. From the Assyrian polytheistic perspective, removing numerous altars would be seen as an act of disrespect or limitation towards a deity, potentially angering it and causing it to withdraw favor. This clause deliberately misrepresents Hezekiah's righteous actions, which were in accordance with God's commands, as impious.
  • "and commanded Judah and Jerusalem, saying, Ye shall worship before one altar": This part of the accusation highlights Hezekiah's command for centralized worship at the Jerusalem Temple. For the Assyrians, this would seem illogical and restrictive, as they believed more altars meant more access to various gods or greater favor from one's own god. For Hezekiah, however, it was strict obedience to the Mosaic Law, which mandated exclusive worship of Yahweh at His chosen sanctuary.
  • "and burn incense upon it?": This final clause reinforces the command for exclusive and centralized worship at the Jerusalem Temple. By consolidating all legitimate sacrificial and incense offerings to this single location, Hezekiah was purifying Judah's worship. This act, which was an expression of deep fidelity to Yahweh, the Assyrian commander, steeped in his own polytheistic religious worldview, could only interpret as an offense to God, thereby attempting to sow discord and fear among the people of Judah.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in this verse is Irony. Rabshakeh intends to accuse Hezekiah of impiety and foolishness, suggesting that his religious reforms have angered his God and led to Jerusalem's precarious situation. However, from the divine and biblical perspective, Hezekiah's actions were precisely what Yahweh commanded and desired—a return to pure, centralized worship. Thus, what the enemy presents as a weakness is, in fact, an act of profound strength and faithfulness, inadvertently highlighting Hezekiah's righteousness. This also functions as Psychological Warfare, as Rabshakeh's speech is designed to demoralize the people of Judah by twisting their king's virtuous deeds into a cause for their impending doom, aiming to break their morale and trust in God's protection. Furthermore, there is clear Misrepresentation of truth, as Rabshakeh either ignorantly or deliberately distorts the nature of Yahweh and the requirements of His covenant, viewing them through a pagan lens that cannot grasp the concept of exclusive monotheistic worship.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse powerfully underscores the nature of true worship: it is not defined by human preferences, convenience, or the proliferation of shrines, but by obedience to God's specific commands and His revealed will. Hezekiah's reforms, though misunderstood and maligned by the world, were a testament to his unwavering commitment to covenant fidelity and a courageous stand against syncretism. The Assyrian taunt reveals a fundamental theological clash: the world's polytheistic, pragmatic view of divinity versus Israel's unique monotheistic, covenantal relationship with Yahweh, who demands exclusive devotion and prescribed worship. God's ultimate deliverance of Jerusalem, despite the overwhelming odds and the enemy's psychological warfare, serves as a powerful vindication of Hezekiah's faithfulness and the truth that obedience, even when it appears foolish or counter-intuitive to the world, is the pathway to divine favor and protection.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

This passage serves as a potent reminder that what the world perceives as weakness, foolishness, or even an offense can, in God's eyes, be an act of profound faith and righteousness. Believers today may face similar accusations or misunderstandings when they strive to obey God's commands, especially when those commands run contrary to popular opinion, cultural norms, or worldly wisdom. It challenges us to critically examine our own worship practices, ensuring they are aligned with God's Word and not influenced by syncretistic tendencies or the desire for worldly approval. Just as Hezekiah removed the "high places" from Judah, we are called to identify and remove any "high places"—idols, distractions, or unauthorized practices—from our lives and churches that divert our exclusive devotion from the one true God. In times of difficulty or accusation, this narrative encourages us to discern truth from deception, to trust in God's sovereignty, and to remain steadfast in obedience, knowing that He ultimately vindicates His faithful servants and brings about His purposes through their fidelity.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do modern "high places" or unauthorized forms of worship manifest in our lives or churches today, potentially diverting our exclusive devotion to God?
  • In what ways might the world misinterpret or criticize our obedience to God's commands, particularly when our actions go against prevailing cultural norms or secular values?
  • How can we discern truth from deception when faced with accusations or arguments that undermine our faith, the integrity of our spiritual leaders, or the purity of our worship?
  • What does Hezekiah's example teach us about leading or participating in spiritual reform in challenging times, even when it involves unpopular decisions or significant personal cost?

FAQ

Why was Hezekiah removing "high places" considered a good thing, even though Sennacherib used it as an accusation?

Answer: Hezekiah's removal of "high places" was a righteous act of obedience to God's covenant commands. The Mosaic Law, particularly in Deuteronomy 12, explicitly commanded Israel to worship God exclusively at one central location—the Temple in Jerusalem—after they entered the Promised Land. The "high places" were local shrines that often became sites of syncretistic worship, mixing the worship of Yahweh with pagan practices, or simply unauthorized worship that deviated from God's prescribed ways. By destroying them, Hezekiah was purifying Judah's worship and bringing the nation back into alignment with God's Law, demonstrating his faithfulness and commitment to true monotheism. Sennacherib, from his polytheistic worldview, could not comprehend this, assuming that more altars meant more access to divine favor, and thus Hezekiah's actions were an offense to his deity rather than an act of fidelity.

What was the outcome of this Assyrian siege, and how does it relate to Hezekiah's reforms?

Answer: The outcome of the Assyrian siege was a miraculous deliverance by God. Despite Sennacherib's overwhelming military might and psychological tactics, God intervened directly. In response to Hezekiah's and the prophet Isaiah's prayers, the angel of the Lord struck down 185,000 Assyrian soldiers in one night, forcing Sennacherib to retreat in shame (as recounted in 2 Chronicles 32:21-22). This divine intervention served as a powerful vindication of Hezekiah's faith and his righteous reforms. It demonstrated that God honors obedience and protects those who faithfully follow His commands, even when facing seemingly insurmountable odds and the world's misunderstanding or scorn. The deliverance confirmed that Hezekiah's actions were not a cause for divine wrath but a path to divine blessing and a testament to God's sovereign power over all earthly kingdoms.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Hezekiah's zealous reform, centralizing worship to "one altar" in Jerusalem, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect centralization of all true worship in Jesus Christ. Just as the physical "high places" were removed to purify worship in Judah, Christ, through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, removes all "high places" of human devising—all self-righteous efforts, false gods, and unauthorized means of approaching God. He is the true and ultimate "one altar" (as hinted in Hebrews 13:10), the singular and exclusive means by which humanity can draw near to the Father. Our worship is no longer tied to a physical temple or a specific geographical location, but is now to be offered "in spirit and truth" through Him (John 4:23-24). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), the High Priest who offered Himself as the perfect and final sacrifice, making all other altars and sacrifices obsolete and unnecessary (Hebrews 9:11-12). Sennacherib's taunt, intended to accuse Hezekiah and undermine faith, ultimately highlights the king's fidelity. Similarly, the accusations of the world and the spiritual accuser are rendered powerless against those who are in Christ, for He has triumphed over all principalities and powers (Colossians 2:15), securing our access to God through His singular, perfect work, and uniting all believers into one body, worshiping the one true God through the one Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32 verses 9–23

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

This story of the rage and blasphemy of Sennacherib, Hezekiah's prayer, and the deliverance of Jerusalem by the destruction of the Assyrian army, we had more at large in the book of Kings, 2 Kings 18 and 19. It is contracted here, yet large enough to show these three things: -

I. The impiety and malice of the church's enemies. Sennacherib has his hands full in besieging Lachish (Ch2 32:9), but hears that Hezekiah is fortifying Jerusalem and encouraging his people to stand it out; and therefore, before he come in person to besiege it, he sends messengers to make speeches, and he himself writes letters to frighten Hezekiah and his people into a surrender of the city. See, 1. His great malice against the king of Judah, in endeavouring to withdraw his subjects from their allegiance to him. He did not treat with Hezekiah as a man of honour would have done, nor propose fair terms to him, but used mean and base artifices, unbecoming a crowned head, to terrify the common people and persuade them to desert him. he represented Hezekiah as one who designed to deceive his subjects into their ruin and betray them to famine and thirst (Ch2 32:11), as one who had done them great wrong and exposed them already to the divine displeasure by taking away the high places and altars (Ch2 32:12), and who, against the common interest of his people, held out against a force that would certainly be their ruin, Ch2 32:15. 2. His great impiety against the God of Israel, the God of Jerusalem he is called (Ch2 32:19), because that was the place he had chosen to put his name there, and because that was the place which was now threatened by the enemy and which the divine Providence had under its special protection. This proud blasphemer compared the great Jehovah, the Maker of heaven and earth, with the dunghill gods of the nations, the work of men's hands, and thought him no more able to deliver his worshippers than they were to deliver theirs (Ch2 32:19), as if an infinite and eternal Spirit had no more wisdom and power than a stone or the stock of a tree. He boasted of his triumphs over the gods of the nations, that they could none of them protect their people (Ch2 32:13-15), and thence inferred not only, How shall your God deliver you? (Ch2 32:14), but, as if he were inferior to them all, How much less shall your God deliver you? as if he were less able to help than any of them. Thus did they rail, rail in writing (which, being more deliberate, is so much the worse), on the Lord God of Israel, as if he were a cipher and an empty name, like all the rest, Ch2 32:17. Sennacherib, in the instructions he gave, said more than enough; but, as if his blasphemies had been too little, his servants, who learned insolence from their master, spoke yet more than he bade them against the Lord God and his servant Hezekiah, Ch2 32:16. And God resents what is said against his servants, and will reckon for it, as well as what is said against himself. All this was intended to frighten the people from their hope in God, which David's enemies sought to take him off from (Psa 11:1; Psa 42:10), saying, There is no help for him in God, Psa 3:2; Psa 71:11. Thus they hoped to take the city by weakening the hands of those that should defend it. Satan, in his temptations, aims to destroy our faith in God's all-sufficiency, knowing that he shall gain his point if he can do that; as we keep our ground if our faith fail not, Luk 22:32.

II. The duty as well as the interest of the church's friends, and that is in the day of distress to pray and cry to Heaven. So Hezekiah did, and the prophet Isaiah, Ch2 32:20. It was a happy time when the king and the prophet joined thus in prayer. Is any troubled? Is any terrified? Let him pray. So we engage God for us; so we encourage ourselves in him. Praying to God is here called crying to Heaven, because we are, in prayer, to eye him as our Father in heaven, whence he beholds the children of men, and where he has prepared his throne.

III. The power and goodness of the church's God. He is able both to control his enemies, be they ever so high, and to relieve his friends, be they ever so low.

1.As the blasphemies of his enemies engage him against them (Deu 32:27), so the prayers of his people engage him for them. They did so here. (1.) The army of the Assyrians was cut off by the sword of an angel, which triumphed particularly in the slaughter of the mighty men of valour, and the leaders and captains, who defied the sword of any man. God delights to abase the proud and secure. The Targum says, The Word of the Lord (the eternal Word) sent Gabriel to do this execution, and that it was done with lightning, and in the passover night: that was the night in which the angel destroyed the first-born of Egypt. But that was not all. (2.) The king of the Assyrians, having received this disgrace, was cut off by the sword of his own sons. Those that came forth of his own bowels slew him, Ch2 32:21. Thus was he mortified first, and then murdered - shamed first, and then slain. Evil pursues sinners; and, when they escape one mischief, they run upon another unseen.

2.By this work of wonder, (1.) God was glorified, as the protector of his people. Thus he saved Jerusalem, not only from the hand of Sennacherib, but from the hand of all others, Ch2 32:22; for such a deliverance as this was an earnest of much mercy in store; and he guided them, that is, he guarded them, on every side. God defends his people by directing them, shows them what they should do, and so saves them from what is designed or done against them. For this many brought gifts unto the Lord, when they saw the great power of God in the defence of his people. Strangers were thereby induced to supplicate his favour and enemies to deprecate his wrath, and both brought gifts to his temple, in token of their care and desire. (2.) Hezekiah was magnified as the favourite and particular care of Heaven. Many brought presents to him (Ch2 32:22, Ch2 32:23), in token of the honour they had for him, and to make an interest in him. By the favour of God enemies are lost and friends gained.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 9–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Chronicles 32:12 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.