TRV
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 2:18–55.
The persons mentioned in the former paragraph are most of them such as we read of, and most of them such as we read much of, in other scriptures; but very few of those to whom this paragraph relates are mentioned any where else. It should seem, the tribe of Judah were more full and exact in their genealogies than any other of the tribes, in which we must acknowledge a special providence, for the clearing of the genealogy of Christ. 1. Here we find Bezaleel, who was head-workman in building the tabernacle, Exo 31:2. 2. Hezron, who was the son of Pharez (Ch1 2:5), was the father of all this progeny, his sons, Caleb and Jerahmeel, being very fruitful, and he himself likewise, even in his old age, for he left his wife pregnant when he died, Ch1 2:24. This Hezron was one of the seventy that went down with Jacob into Egypt, Gen 46:12. There his family thus increased, as other oppressed families there did. We cannot but suppose that he died during the Israelites' bondage in Egypt; and yet it is here said he died in Caleb-Ephratah (that is, Bethlehem), in the land of Canaan, Ch1 2:24. Perhaps, though the body of the people continued in Egypt, yet some that were more active than the rest, at least before their bondage came to be extreme, visited Canaan sometimes and got footing there, though afterwards they lost it. The achievements of Jair, here mentioned (Ch1 2:22, Ch1 2:23), we had an account of in Num 32:41; and, it is supposed, they were long after the conquest of Canaan. The Jews say, Hezron married his third wife when he was sixty years old (Ch1 2:21), and another afterwards (Ch1 2:24), because he had a great desire of posterity in the family of Pharez, from whom the Messiah was to descend. 3. Here is mention of one that died without children (Ch1 2:30), and another (Ch1 2:32), and of one that had no sons, but daughters, Ch1 2:34. Let those that are in any of these ways afflicted not think their case new or singular. Providence orders these affairs of families by an incontestable sovereignty, as pleaseth him, giving children, or withholding them, or giving all of one sex. He is not bound to please us, but we are bound to acquiesce in his good pleasure. To those that love him he will himself be better than ten sons, and give them in his house a place and a name better than of sons and daughters. Let not those therefore that are written childless envy the families that are built up and replenished. Shall our eye be evil because God's is good? 4. Here is mention of one who had an only daughter, and married her to his servant an Egyptian, Ch1 2:34, Ch1 2:35. If it be mentioned to his praise, we must suppose that this Egyptian was proselyted to the Jewish religion and that he was very eminent for wisdom and virtue, otherwise it would not have become a true-born Israelite to match a daughter to him, especially an only daughter. If Egyptians become converts, and servants do worthily, neither their parentage nor their servitude should be a bar to their preferment. Such a one this Egyptian servant might be that she who married him might live as happily with him as if she had married one of the rulers of her tribe. 5. The pedigree of several of these terminates, not in a person, but in a place or country, as one is said to be the father of Kirjath-jearim (Ch1 2:50), another of Bethlehem (Ch1 2:51), which was afterwards David's city, because these places fell to their lot in the division of the land. 6. here are some that are said to be families of scribes (Ch1 2:55), such as kept up learning in their family, especially scripture-learning, and taught the people the good knowledge of God. Among all these great families we are glad to find some that were families of scribes. Would to God that all the Lord's people were prophets - all the families of Israel families of scribes, well instructed to the kingdom of heaven, and able to bring out of their treasury things new and old!
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 2:37 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 2:37 serves as a concise yet significant entry within the expansive genealogies of the tribe of Judah, meticulously tracing a specific segment of the lineage of Jerahmeel, a prominent clan descended from Hezron, who was a son of Perez and grandson of Judah. This verse, stating "And Zabad begat Ephlal, and Ephlal begat Obed," precisely records the continuation of a particular family line, underscoring the chronicler's profound commitment to preserving the tribal and familial identities essential for the post-exilic community's restoration and continuity.
Context
Literary Context
The book of 1 Chronicles commences with a sweeping genealogical survey spanning from Adam to the post-exilic return, dedicating its initial nine chapters almost exclusively to these detailed lists. Chapters 2-4 specifically zero in on the tribe of Judah, highlighting its preeminence and the eventual emergence of the Davidic line. Within this broader framework, 1 Chronicles 2:9-55 meticulously details the descendants of Hezron, a pivotal figure in Judah's lineage. This particular verse, 1 Chronicles 2:37, is situated within the sub-lineage of Jerahmeel (1 Chronicles 2:25-41), Hezron's firstborn son. While this specific line does not directly lead to the Davidic monarchy, its meticulous inclusion demonstrates the chronicler's profound concern for the integrity of all tribal records, affirming the continuity, structure, and divine preservation of the Israelite community. The pervasive repetition of the verb "begat" throughout these chapters creates a rhythmic and authoritative declaration of generational succession, reinforcing the unbroken chain of descent.
Historical & Cultural Context
The composition of 1 Chronicles is widely attributed to the post-exilic period, likely in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE, a time when the returned exiles were intensely focused on re-establishing their identity, validating land claims, and restoring temple worship in Judah. In this cultural milieu, genealogies were far more than mere historical records; they functioned as vital legal, social, and theological documents. They served to affirm tribal affiliation, validate claims to ancestral land, confirm eligibility for priestly or Levitical service, and establish the legitimacy of royal succession. For a community grappling with the trauma of displacement, loss of identity, and the need for restoration, these detailed records provided a tangible and irrefutable link to their past, ensuring continuity with God's covenant people and their cherished heritage. The inclusion of seemingly minor figures like Zabad, Ephlal, and Obed underscores the profound importance of every single link in the generational chain for the collective identity and future of the nation.
Key Themes
Though remarkably brief, 1 Chronicles 2:37 contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes woven throughout 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully emphasizes the continuity of lineage, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His chosen people across countless generations, even through periods of profound national crisis, exile, and dispersion. The unbroken chain of "begats" reinforces the profound theological truth that every individual, no matter how seemingly obscure, plays a vital part in the grand, unfolding narrative of God's redemptive plan. Secondly, it subtly but surely highlights God's faithfulness to His promises. The very existence of these meticulously preserved records testifies to the precise and intricate way God works through human history to fulfill His divine covenants, such as the promise to make Abraham a great nation found in the Abrahamic covenant and the promise of an eternal dynasty through the Davidic covenant. Finally, this verse quietly points to the significance of the "ordinary." While Zabad, Ephlal, and Obed are not celebrated heroes of faith, mighty kings, or prominent prophets, their inclusion in the sacred text affirms that every life is profoundly valued by God and contributes meaningfully to the unfolding of His divine purpose, even if their specific deeds are not extensively recorded. This meticulous record-keeping is foundational for understanding the broader historical and theological framework of Israel, culminating in the genealogy of Jesus Christ in the New Testament, where every link in the chain matters.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
Derived from the Hebrew root meaning "to give" or "to bestow," Zabad (H2066) literally means "giver" or "bestowed." While the biblical text provides no specific details about this individual's life, the meaning of his name subtly resonates with the broader theme of divine provision and the gifting of life through generations. In a genealogical context, his very existence is a "gift" that continues the lineage.
The Hebrew verb יָלַד (yâlad, H3205) is a foundational and frequently used term in biblical genealogies, meaning "to bear young," "to give birth," or "to beget." It signifies direct lineal descent, establishing a clear, unambiguous, and unbroken chain of fatherhood and generational succession. In this context, its repeated use emphasizes the precise and meticulous nature of the chronicler's record-keeping, ensuring the integrity and continuity of the family lines. It is a simple yet profoundly powerful verb that underpins the entire genealogical framework, acting as the essential connective tissue between generations.
As an active participle of the Hebrew verb meaning "to serve," Obed (H5744) literally means "serving" or "worshipper." Like Zabad, no specific actions are recorded for Obed in this verse. However, the meaning of his name, "serving," can be seen as a quiet theological statement, suggesting that even those whose lives are not highlighted in grand narratives are nonetheless part of God's people, called to a life of service or worship, contributing to the larger covenant community.
Verse Breakdown
"And Zabad begat Ephlal"
This initial clause establishes the first link in the specific segment of the Jerahmeelite lineage recorded in this verse. Zabad is clearly identified as the father of Ephlal, thereby continuing the generational progression within this family line. The conjunctive "And" seamlessly links this new generation to the preceding one, maintaining the continuous flow and rhythmic structure characteristic of genealogical lists throughout Chronicles.
"and Ephlal begat Obed"
This second clause extends the lineage by one more generation, identifying Ephlal as the father of Obed. The deliberate repetition of the verb "begat" powerfully reinforces the direct paternal relationship and the sequential, orderly nature of the family tree. Together, these two concise clauses provide a factual, unadorned record of three successive generations within a specific clan of Judah, contributing to the broader mosaic of Israel's ancestral history.
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 2:37, and indeed throughout the extensive genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles, is Repetition. The consistent and formulaic use of the verb "begat" (or its Hebrew equivalent) creates a rhythmic, almost liturgical cadence that powerfully underscores the unbroken continuity and divine preservation of the family lines. This pervasive repetition serves to emphasize the meticulousness of the chronicler's record-keeping and highlights God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving the generations of His covenant people. Furthermore, the entire section functions as a Genealogical Form, which is a distinct and highly significant literary genre prevalent in ancient Near Eastern and biblical literature. This form is not merely a dry list of names but a profound theological statement, conveying legitimacy, identity, and the fulfillment of divine promises through the orderly progression of human history. The concise, formulaic structure of "X begat Y" is a hallmark of this genre, making the information clear, authoritative, and easily traceable, serving both historical and theological purposes for the post-exilic community.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 2:37, despite its remarkable brevity and seemingly mundane nature, stands as a profound testament to God's meticulous involvement in human history and His unwavering commitment to His covenant people. It underscores the vital theological truth that every individual, even those not highlighted by grand narratives of heroism or leadership, is an integral part of God's overarching plan. The preservation of these names, however obscure they may seem to a modern reader, speaks volumes about God's faithfulness in remembering His people and meticulously guiding their lineage toward His ultimate redemptive purposes. It serves as a powerful reminder that divine providence works through the seemingly ordinary and unremarkable, ensuring the continuity of the covenant line and the eventual fulfillment of all His promises. This verse, therefore, is not merely about human ancestry but about the divine sovereignty that orchestrates history with precision and purpose.
Reflection and Application
In a world that frequently elevates and values only the famous, the powerful, or those whose lives are marked by grand, public accomplishments, 1 Chronicles 2:37 offers a quiet but profoundly counter-cultural message: every life, no matter how seemingly ordinary or unrecorded, matters deeply in God's eyes. Zabad, Ephlal, and Obed were not kings, mighty prophets, or celebrated warriors, yet their very existence was absolutely crucial for the continuation of their specific family line and, by extension, for the broader, intricate tapestry of God's people. This truth serves as a powerful reminder that our ultimate significance is not solely determined by our accomplishments, public recognition, or the accolades we receive, but fundamentally by our unique and irreplaceable place within God's vast, intricate, and eternally unfolding design. We are all integral parts of a larger story, participants in a rich heritage of faith passed down through countless generations, and our lives, however seemingly ordinary, contribute meaningfully to the unfolding of God's perfect purposes. This profound realization should encourage us to live faithfully and with intentionality, knowing that our "small" acts of obedience, our quiet presence, and our very existence are cherished, remembered, and orchestrated by a God who meticulously cares for and directs all of history.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why are biblical genealogies, like 1 Chronicles 2:37, considered so important if they often appear to be just long lists of names?
Biblical genealogies are far more than mere lists; they are vital theological, historical, and sociological documents that served multiple crucial purposes for the ancient Israelite community and continue to hold profound significance for believers today.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While 1 Chronicles 2:37 is part of a lineage not directly leading to the Davidic line, it nonetheless contributes profoundly to the broader Christ-centered narrative by affirming the meticulous preservation of God's covenant people, a necessary prerequisite for the Incarnation. The very existence of these detailed genealogies, even those for seemingly "ordinary" individuals like Zabad, Ephlal, and Obed, testifies to God's sovereign control over every thread of human history and His unwavering commitment to His covenant promises. Every single "begat" recorded in the Old Testament, from Adam onward, represents a deliberate step orchestrated by divine providence, leading inexorably to the "fullness of time" when God would send His Son. The careful record-keeping ensures that when the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, finally appeared, He would be unequivocally identified as the promised seed, born of a woman, born under the law, and descended from Abraham and David, precisely as foretold in the Scriptures. Thus, even the most obscure genealogical entry in Chronicles points to the faithfulness of God in preserving the human lineage through which the Savior would ultimately enter the world, fulfilling the hope of blessing to all nations. The detailed human history meticulously recorded here is the very canvas upon which God painted His masterpiece of redemption in Christ, ensuring that when God sent forth His Son, He was indeed the one for whom all previous generations had been preserved and prepared.