Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And it shall be, that whosoever shall go out of the doors of thy house into the street, his blood shall be upon his head, and we will be guiltless: and whosoever shall be with thee in the house, his blood shall be on our head, if any hand be upon him.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And it shall be, that whosoever H834 shall go out H3318 of the doors H1817 of thy house H1004 into the street H2351, his blood H1818 shall be upon his head H7218, and we will be guiltless H5355: and whosoever shall be with thee in the house H1004, his blood H1818 shall be on our head H7218, if any hand H3027 be upon him.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
If anyone goes out the doors of your house into the street, he will be responsible for his own blood, and we will be guiltless. But everyone who stays with you in the house - we will be responsible for his blood if anyone lays a hand on him.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
If anyone goes out the door of your house into the street, his blood will be on his own head, and we will be innocent. But if a hand is laid on anyone with you in the house, his blood will be on our heads.
Ask
American Standard Version
And it shall be, that whosoever shall go out of the doors of thy house into the street, his blood shall be upon his head, and we shall be guiltless: and whosoever shall be with thee in the house, his blood shall be on our head, if any hand be upon him.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
It shall be that whoever goes out of the doors of your house into the street, his blood will be on his head, and we will be guiltless. Whoever is with you in the house, his blood shall be on our head, if any hand is on him.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And whosoeuer then doeth goe out at the doores of thine house into the streete, his blood shalbe vpon his head, and we will be giltlesse: but whosoeuer shall be with thee in the house, his blood shalbe on our head, if any hande touch him:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and it hath been, any one who goeth out from the doors of thy house without, his blood is on his head, and we are innocent; and any one who is with thee in the house, his blood is on our head, if a hand is on him;
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 2:19 records the solemn oath made by the Israelite spies to Rahab, establishing the precise conditions for the safety of her household during the impending destruction of Jericho. It stipulates that anyone found outside her house during the attack would bear responsibility for their own death, thereby absolving the spies of guilt. Conversely, it declares that if any harm befell those who remained within the house, the responsibility and bloodguilt would fall upon the Israelites. This verse underscores the binding nature of their covenant and the critical importance of strict adherence to the stipulated terms for the promised salvation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Joshua 2:19 serves as the culmination of the covenant established between the two Israelite spies and Rahab, a harlot from Jericho. The narrative commences with Joshua dispatching the spies to reconnoiter the land, specifically Jericho, as detailed in Joshua 2:1. Upon their arrival, Rahab shelters them, hiding them from the king of Jericho's men. After ensuring their safe escape, Rahab, demonstrating remarkable faith in the God of Israel and acknowledging His overwhelming power, as expressed in Joshua 2:9-11, pleads for the salvation of her family. Verses Joshua 2:12-18 elaborate on the spies' agreement, the sign of the scarlet cord, and the explicit instructions for Rahab's family to gather within her house. Verse 19 then meticulously defines the precise terms of this conditional protection, emphasizing the dire consequences of adherence or deviation, directly preceding the spies' return to Joshua in Joshua 2:23.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Joshua 2 unfold during Israel's conquest of Canaan, a period marked by divine judgment against the idolatrous and morally corrupt Canaanite nations. Jericho, a strategically vital and heavily fortified city, was designated as the first target for conquest. The concept of "bloodguilt" was deeply ingrained in ancient Near Eastern legal and moral codes, signifying culpability for a death, often requiring retribution or atonement. Oaths and covenants were considered profoundly sacred and binding, frequently invoked with divine witnesses, and their violation carried severe consequences. The spies' oath to Rahab, therefore, was not a casual promise but a solemn, life-or-death commitment. Rahab's profession as a harlot, while socially marginalized, might have also positioned her house on the city wall, making it a convenient and inconspicuous place for spies to enter and observe, as implied by Joshua 2:15.
  • Key Themes: Joshua 2:19 significantly contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Joshua and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights Divine Protection and Conditional Salvation, demonstrating that God's deliverance often operates through specific instructions and human obedience. Rahab's family's safety is strictly contingent upon remaining within the designated sanctuary, paralleling the Passover narrative where safety was found within blood-marked homes, as seen in Exodus 12:13. Secondly, the verse underscores the concept of Covenant Faithfulness and Responsibility. The spies' willingness to take "blood on our head" for those inside the house emphasizes the gravity of their oath and their commitment to uphold their promise, reflecting God's own unwavering faithfulness to His covenants. This contrasts sharply with the self-inflicted "blood on his head" for those who disregard the terms. Finally, Rahab's story, culminating in this verse, exemplifies Faith Beyond Israel, showing that salvation is offered even to Gentiles who turn to the God of Israel, anticipating a broader scope of God's redemptive plan, as seen in the inclusion of Ruth the Moabitess in Israel's lineage, recorded in Ruth 4:13-22.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • House (Hebrew, bayith', H1004): This word, H1004, refers to a physical dwelling but also carries broader connotations of family, household, or even a place of refuge. In this verse, Rahab's "house" is not merely a structure but becomes a designated sanctuary, a specific place of safety and covenant protection for her and her entire family. Its significance extends beyond bricks and mortar to represent the sphere of the covenant's application.
  • Blood (Hebrew, dâm', H1818): "blood," in this context, refers to life itself and, more specifically, to the responsibility for a person's death. The idiom "his blood upon his head" (דָּמֹו בְרֹאשׁוֹ) signifies that the person's death is their own fault or responsibility, and no one else is culpable. Conversely, "his blood on our head" means the responsibility for the death falls upon the oath-takers, indicating their solemn commitment to protect and their culpability if they fail. This concept is deeply rooted in ancient Near Eastern legal systems and biblical law, where the shedding of innocent blood incurred severe guilt and often required retribution, as seen in Genesis 9:5-6.
  • Guiltless (Hebrew, nâqîy', H5355): "guiltless," denotes being innocent, clean, or absolved of responsibility or punishment. When the spies declare "we will be guiltless," they are asserting that if Rahab's family members violate the terms of the agreement by leaving the house, their subsequent harm or death would not be considered a breach of the spies' oath, nor would it incur bloodguilt upon them. It emphasizes the conditional nature of their promise and the clear delineation of accountability.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And it shall be, that whosoever shall go out of the doors of thy house into the street, his blood shall be upon his head, and we will be guiltless:" This clause establishes the first condition and its dire consequence. It clearly states that if any individual from Rahab's household ventures outside the safety of her home into the public thoroughfare during the impending Israelite attack, their death will be considered their own responsibility. The idiom "his blood shall be upon his head" signifies self-culpability, effectively absolving the Israelite spies (and by extension, Israel) from any responsibility or bloodguilt for that person's demise. This highlights the absolute necessity of remaining within the designated sanctuary.
  • "and whosoever shall be with thee in the house, his blood shall be on our head, if any hand be upon him." This second clause outlines the reciprocal commitment and its terms. It solemnly declares that if anyone who remains inside Rahab's house is harmed or killed by an Israelite hand, the responsibility for that death, the "bloodguilt," would fall directly upon the spies. This is a powerful affirmation of their oath, demonstrating the gravity of their promise to protect Rahab and her family who adhere to the conditions. It underscores their unwavering commitment to honor the covenant they have made.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices to convey its crucial message. Antithesis is prominent, starkly contrasting the fate and responsibility of those who leave the house ("his blood shall be upon his head") with those who remain inside ("his blood shall be on our head"). This sharp opposition highlights the binary choice Rahab's family faces and the clear, life-or-death consequences of each decision. Idiom is central to the meaning, particularly the phrase "his blood upon his head," which is a well-established Hebrew expression for personal culpability or self-inflicted judgment. The use of this idiom lends gravitas and legal precision to the covenant. Furthermore, the entire agreement functions as a Conditional Covenant, where divine protection (mediated through the spies' agency) is strictly contingent upon human obedience to specific instructions, mirroring larger biblical patterns of covenant relationship. The Repetition of the phrase "his blood" emphasizes the life-and-death stakes and the precise transfer of responsibility under the terms of the oath.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 2:19 powerfully illustrates the principle of conditional salvation and the binding nature of covenant. Rahab's faith, expressed earlier in the chapter, is met with a concrete divine provision mediated through the spies, but this provision is strictly contingent upon adherence to specific instructions: remaining within the designated sanctuary of her house. This echoes numerous biblical narratives where God's deliverance is tied to obedience, emphasizing that faith is not merely intellectual assent but active trust expressed through adherence to divine directives. The concept of "bloodguilt" also highlights the seriousness of life and death, and the moral accountability inherent in promises made, reflecting God's own unwavering faithfulness to His word.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Joshua 2:19 offers profound spiritual lessons for believers today. Just as Rahab's family found physical safety within the confines of her house, believers find spiritual security and protection by remaining within the boundaries God sets. This can refer to His commands, His covenant, and the spiritual sanctuary found in Christ. The narrative underscores that genuine faith is not passive; it requires active obedience to God's revealed will. Rahab's family's deliverance was contingent not just on her faith in the God of Israel, but also on their collective adherence to the spies' instructions to stay inside. This teaches us that our spiritual walk similarly requires both unwavering trust in God's promises and diligent obedience to His word. Furthermore, the spies' commitment to their oath, even to a Gentile, reflects God's own unwavering faithfulness to His covenants and His desire for all to come to salvation, provided they respond in faith and obedience. This passage reminds us that while God's grace is freely given, it often calls for a responsive act of obedience, demonstrating our trust in His protective hand.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "house" or "boundaries" has God given you to remain within for your spiritual protection and flourishing?
  • How does Rahab's story challenge your understanding of the relationship between faith and obedience?
  • In what ways might we, like those outside Rahab's house, be tempted to step outside of God's protective commands, and what are the potential consequences?

FAQ

What is the significance of "his blood shall be upon his head"?

Answer: This is a powerful Hebrew idiom signifying that an individual is solely responsible for their own death or misfortune. In the context of Joshua 2:19, it means that if any of Rahab's family members were to leave the house during the Israelite attack and subsequently be killed, their death would be considered their own fault for violating the terms of the agreement. The Israelite spies would be absolved of any guilt or responsibility. This idiom is used elsewhere in the Old Testament to denote culpability, such as in 2 Samuel 1:16 where David tells the Amalekite who claimed to have killed Saul, "Your blood be on your head."

Why was it so important for Rahab's family to stay inside her house?

Answer: Staying inside Rahab's house was the explicit and non-negotiable condition for their salvation and protection from the impending destruction of Jericho. The house, clearly marked by the scarlet cord, as specified in Joshua 2:18, served as a designated sanctuary, a specific place where the covenant of protection applied. This act of remaining inside was a visible and essential demonstration of their faith and obedience to the instructions given by the Israelite spies. It powerfully mirrored the Passover event in Exodus 12, where the Israelites were required to stay inside their blood-marked homes to be spared from the angel of death. Symbolically, it represented the necessity of being "under cover" or "under the blood" for salvation from divine judgment.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Joshua 2:19, with its emphasis on conditional protection within a designated sanctuary, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate salvation found in Jesus Christ. Rahab's house, marked by the scarlet cord, becomes a type of ark, a place of refuge from divine judgment, much like Noah's ark provided safety from the flood in Genesis 7:1. The "blood on our head" concept, where the spies willingly take responsibility for those within the house, points profoundly to Christ's substitutionary atonement. He willingly took the "bloodguilt" of humanity upon Himself, bearing the full consequences of sin on the cross, so that those "in Him" might be declared guiltless and receive eternal life, as proclaimed in 2 Corinthians 5:21. Just as Rahab's family was saved by remaining in the house, believers are saved by being in Christ, who is the true sanctuary and the mediator of a new and better covenant, as taught in Hebrews 9:15. The scarlet cord itself, a visual sign of the covenant and a symbol of life preserved through a specific mark, subtly prefigures the saving power of Christ's shed blood, through which forgiveness and new life are offered to all who believe and remain "under His covering" and protection, as revealed in Ephesians 1:7.

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 2 verses 8–21

The matter is here settled between Rahab and the spies respecting the service she was now to do for them, and the favour they were afterwards to show to her. She secures them on condition that they should secure her.

I. She gives them, and by them sends to Joshua and Israel, all the encouragement that could be desired to make their intended descent upon Canaan. this was what they came for, and it was worth coming for. Having got clear of the officers, she comes up to them to the roof of the house where they lay hid, finds them perhaps somewhat dismayed at the peril they apprehended themselves in from the officers, and scarcely recovered from the fright, but has that to say to them which will give them abundant satisfaction. 1. She lets them know that the report of the great things God had done for them had come to Jericho (v. 10), not only that they had an account of their late victories obtained over the Amorites in the neighbouring country, on the other side of the river, but that their miraculous deliverance out of Egypt, and passage through the Red Sea, a great way off, and forty years ago, were remembered and talked of afresh in Jericho, to the amazement of every body. Thus this Joshua and his fellows were men wondered at, Zac 3:8. See how God makes his wonderful works to be remembered (Psa 111:4), so that men shall speak of the might of his terrible acts, Psa 145:6. 2. She tells them what impressions the tidings of these things had made upon the Canaanites: Your terror has fallen upon us (Jos 2:9); our hearts did melt, Jos 2:11. If she kept a public house, this would give her an opportunity of understanding the sense of various companies and of travellers from other parts of the country, so that they could not know this any way better than by her information; and it would be of great use to Joshua and Israel to know it; it would put courage into the most cowardly Israelite to hear how their enemies were dispirited, and it was easy to conclude that those who now fainted before them would infallibly fall before them, especially because it was the accomplishment of a promise God had made them, that he would lay the fear and dread of them upon all this land (Deu 11:25), and so it would be an earnest of the accomplishment of all the other promises God had made to them. Let not the stout man glory in his courage, any more than the strong man in his strength; for God can weaken both mind and body. Let not God's Israel be afraid of their most powerful enemies; for their God can, when he pleases, make their most powerful enemies afraid of them. Let none think to harden their hearts against God and prosper; for he that made man's soul can at any time make the sword of his terrors approach to it. 3. She hereupon makes profession of her faith in God and his promise; and perhaps there was not found so great faith (all things considered), no, not in Israel, as in this woman of Canaan. (1.) who believes God's power and dominion over all the world (v. 11): "Jehovah your God, whom you worship and call upon, is so far above all gods that he is the only true God; for he is God in heaven above and in earth beneath, and is served by all the hosts of both." A vast distance there is between heaven and earth, yet both are equally under the inspection and government of the great Jehovah. Heaven is not above his power, nor is earth below his cognizance. (2.) She believes his promise to his people Israel (v. 9): I know that the Lord hath given you the land. The king of Jericho had heard as much as she had of the great things God had done for Israel, yet he cannot infer thence that the Lord had given them this land, but resolves to hold it out against them to the last extremity; for the most powerful means of conviction will not of themselves attain the end without divine grace, and by that grace Rahab the harlot, who had only heard of the wonders God had wrought, speaks with more assurance of the truth of the promise made to the fathers than all the elders of Israel had done who were eye-witnesses of those wonders, many of whom perished through unbelief of this promise. Blessed are those that have not seen, and yet have believed; so Rahab did. O woman, great is thy faith!

II. She engaged them to take her and her relations under their protection, that they might not perish in the destruction of Jericho, v. 12, 13. Now, 1. It was an evidence of the sincerity and strength of her faith concerning the approaching revolution in her country that she was so solicitous to make an interest for herself with the Israelites, and courted their kindness. She foresaw the conquest of her country, and in the belief of that bespoke in time the favour of the conquerors. Thus Noah, being moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house, and the condemning of the world, Heb 11:7. Those who truly believe the divine revelation concerning the ruin of sinners, and the grant of the heavenly land to God's Israel, will give diligence to flee from the wrath to come, and to lay hold of eternal life, by joining themselves to God and to his people. 2. The provision she made for the safety of her relations, as well as for her own, is a laudable instance of natural affection, and an intimation to us in like manner to do all we can for the salvation of the souls of those that are dear to us, and, with ourselves, to bring them, if possible, into the bond of the covenant. No mention is made of her husband and children, but only her parents, and brothers, and sisters, for whom, though she was herself a housekeeper, she retained a due concern. 3. Her request that they would swear unto her by Jehovah is an instance of her acquaintance with the only true God, and her faith in him and devotion towards him, one act of which is religiously to swear by his name. 4. Her petition is very just and reasonable, that, since she had protected them, they should protect her, and since her kindness to them extended to their people, for whom they were now negotiating, their kindness to her should take in all hers. It was the least they could do for one that had saved their lives with the hazard of her own. Note, Those that show mercy may expect to find mercy. Observe, She does not demand any preferment by way of reward for her kindness to them, though they lay so much at her mercy that she might have made her own terms, but only indents for her Life, which in a general destruction would be a singular favour. Thus God promised Ebed-Melech, in recompence for his kindness to Jeremiah, that in the worst of times he should have his life for a prey, Jer 39:18. Yet this Rahab was afterwards advanced to be a princess in Israel, the wife of Salmon, and one of the ancestors of Christ, Mat 1:5. Those that faithfully serve Christ and suffer for him he will not only protect, but prefer, and will do for them more than they are able to ask or think.

III. They solemnly engaged for her preservation in the common destruction (Jos 2:14): "Our life for yours. We will take as much care of your lives as of our own, and would as soon hurt ourselves as any of you." Nay, they imprecate God's judgments on themselves if they should violate their promise to her. She had pawned her life for theirs, and now they in requital pawn their lives for hers, and (as public persons) with them they pawn the public faith and the credit of their nation, for they plainly interest all Israel in the engagement in those words, When the Lord has given us the land, meaning not themselves only, but the people whose agents they were. No doubt they knew themselves sufficiently authorized to treat with Rahab concerning this matter, and were confident that Joshua would ratify what they did, else they had not dealt honestly; the general law that they should make no covenant with the Canaanites (Deu 7:2) did not forbid them to take under their protection a particular person, that had heartily come into their interests and had done them real kindnesses. The law of gratitude is one of the laws of nature. Now observe here, 1. The promises they made her. In general, "We will deal kindly and truly with thee, v. 14. We will not only be kind in promising now, but true in performing what we promise; and not only true in performing just what we promise, but kind in out-doing thy demands and expectations." The goodness of God is often expressed by his kindness and truth (Psa 117:2), and in both these we must be followers of him. In particular, "If a hand be upon any in the house with thee, his blood shall be on our head," v. 19. If hurt come through our carelessness to those whom we are obliged to protect, we thereby contract guilt, and blood will be found a heavy load. 2. The provisos and limitations of their promises. Though they were in haste, and it may be in some confusion, yet we find them very cautious in settling this agreement and the terms of it, not to bind themselves to more than was fit for them to perform. Note, Covenants must be made with care, and we must swear in judgment, lest we find ourselves perplexed and entangled when it is too late after vows to make enquiry. Those that will be conscientious in keeping their promises will be cautious in making them, and perhaps may insert conditions which others may think frivolous. Their promise is here accompanied with three provisos, and they were necessary ones. They will protect Rahab, and all her relations always, provided, (1.) That she tie the scarlet cord with which she was now about to let them down in the window of her house, v. 18. This was to be a mark upon the house, which the spies would take care to give notice of to the camp of Israel, that no soldier, how hot and eager soever he was in military executions, might offer any violence to the house that was thus distinguished. This was like the blood sprinkled upon the door-post, which secured the first-born from the destroying angel, and, being of the same colour, some allude to this also to represent the safety of believers under the protection of the blood of Christ sprinkled on the conscience. The same cord that she made use of for the preservation of these Israelites was to be made use of for her preservation. What we serve and honour God with we may expect he will bless and make comfortable to us. (2.) That she should have all those whose safety she had desired in the house with her and keep them there, and that, at the time of taking the town, none of them should dare to stir out of doors, v. 18, 19. This was a necessary proviso, for Rahab's kindred could not be distinguished any other way than by being in her distinguished house; should they mingle with their neighbours, there was no remedy, but the sword would devour one as well as another. It was a reasonable proviso that, since they were saved purely for Rahab's sake, her house should have the honour of being their castle, and that, if they would not perish with those that believed not, they should thus far believe the certainty and severity of the ruin coming upon their city as to retire into a place made safe by promise, as Noah into the ark and Lot into Zoar, and should save themselves from this untoward generation, by separating from them. It was likewise a significant proviso, intimating to us that those who are added to the church that they may be saved must keep close to the society of the faithful, and, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust, must take heed of being again entangled therein. (3.) That she should keep counsel (v. 14, 20): If thou utter this our business, that is, "If thou betray us when we are gone, or if thou make this agreement public, so as that others tie scarlet lines in their windows and so confound us, then we will be clear of thy oath." Those are unworthy of the secret of the Lord that know now how to keep it to themselves when there is occasion.

IV. She then took effectual care to secure her new friends, and sent them out another way, Jam 2:25. Having fully understood the bargain they made with her, and consented to it (Jos 2:21), she then let them down by a cord over the city wall (Jos 2:15), the situation of her house befriending them herein: thus Paul made his escape out of Damascus, Co2 11:33. She also directed them which way to go for their own safety, being better acquainted with the country than they were, Jos 2:16. she directs them to leave the high road, and abscond in the mountains till the pursuers returned, for till then they could not safely venture over Jordan. those that are in the way of God and their duty may expect that Providence will protect them, but this will not excuse them from taking all prudent methods for their own safety. God will keep us, but then we must not wilfully expose ourselves. Providence must be trusted, but not tempted. Calvin thinks that their charge to Rahab to keep this matter secret, and not to utter it, was intended for her safety, lest she, boasting of her security from the sword of Israel, should, before they came to protect her, fall into the hands of the king of Jericho and be put to death for treason: thus do they prudently advise her for her safety, as she advised them for theirs. And it is good advice, which we should at any time be thankful for, to take heed to ourselves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–21. Public domain.
Copy as
Clement of RomeAD 99
Clement's First Letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 12
On account of her faith and hospitality, Rahab the harlot was saved. For when spies were sent by Joshua, the son of Nun, to Jericho, the king of the country ascertained that they had come to spy out their land, and sent men to seize them, in order that, when taken, they might be put to death. But the hospitable Rahab receiving them, concealed them on the roof of her house under some stalks of flax. And when the men sent by the king arrived and said, "There came men unto you who are to spy out our land; bring them forth, for so the king commands," she answered them, "The two men whom you seek came unto me, but quickly departed again and are gone," thus not discovering the spies to them. Then she said to the men, "I know assuredly that the Lord your God has given you this city, for the fear and dread of you have fallen on its inhabitants. When therefore you shall have taken it, keep ye me and the house of my father in safety." And they said to her, "It shall be as you have spoken to us. As soon, therefore, as you know that we are at hand, you shall gather all your family under your roof, and they shall be preserved, but all that are found outside of your dwelling shall perish." Moreover, they gave her a sign to this effect, that she should hang forth from her house a scarlet thread. And thus they made it manifest that redemption should flow through the blood of the Lord to all them that believe and hope in God. You see, beloved, that there was not only faith, but prophecy, in this woman.
Origen of AlexandriaAD 253
HOMILIES ON JOSHUA 3.5
Also this commandment is given to the person who was once a prostitute: “All,” it says, “who will be found in your house will be saved. But concerning those who go out from the house, we ourselves are free of them by your oath.” Therefore, if anyone wants to be saved, let him come into the house of this one who was once a prostitute. Even if anyone from that people wants to be saved, let him come in order to be able to attain salvation. Let him come to this house in which the blood of Christ is the sign of redemption. For among those who said, “His blood be upon us and upon our children,” the blood of Christ is for condemnation. For Jesus had been appointed “for the ruin and the resurrection of many.” Therefore, for those refuting his sign, his blood effects punishment; for those who believe, salvation.Let no one persuade himself, let no one deceive himself. Outside this house, that is, outside the church, no one is saved. If anyone goes outside, he is responsible for his own death. This is the significance of the blood, for this is also the purification that is manifest through the blood.
CyprianAD 258
Epistle LXXV.4
For the faith of the sacred Scripture sets forth that the Church is not without, nor can be separated nor divided against itself, but maintains the unity of an inseparable and undivided house; since it is written of the sacrament of the passover, and of the lamb, which Lamb designated Christ: "In one house shall it be eaten: ye shall not carry forth the flesh abroad out of the house." Which also we see expressed concerning Rahab, who herself also bore a type of the Church, who received the command which said, "Thou shalt bring thy father, and thy mother, and thy brethren, and all thy father's household unto thee into thine house; and whosoever shall go out of the doors of thine house into the street, his blood shall be upon him." In which mystery is declared, that they who will live, and escape from the destruction of the world, must be gathered together into one house alone, that is, into the Church; but whosoever of those thus collected together shall go out abroad, that is, if any one, although he may have obtained grace in the Church, shall depart and go out of the Church, that his blood shall be upon him; that is, that he himself must charge it upon himself that he perishes; which the Apostle Paul explains, teaching and enjoining that a heretic must be avoided, as perverse, and a sinner, and as condemned of himself. For that man will be guilty of his own ruin, who, not being cast out by the bishop, but of his own accord deserting from the Church is by heretical presumption condemned of himself.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 2:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.