Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And hast not suffered me to kiss my sons and my daughters? thou hast now done foolishly in so doing.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And hast not suffered H5203 me to kiss H5401 my sons H1121 and my daughters H1323? thou hast now done foolishly H5528 in so doing H6213.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
You didn't even let me kiss my sons and daughters good-bye! What a stupid thing to do!
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But you did not even let me kiss my grandchildren and my daughters goodbye. Now you have done a foolish thing.
Ask
American Standard Version
and didst not suffer me to kiss my sons and my daughters? now hast thou done foolishly.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and didn’t allow me to kiss my sons and my daughters? Now have you done foolishly.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But thou hast not suffered me to kisse my sonnes and my daughters: nowe thou hast done foolishly in doing so.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and hast not suffered me to kiss my sons and my daughters? --now thou hast acted foolishly in doing so ;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
The Migrations of Jacob (Part 1)
The Migrations of Jacob (Part 1) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 902 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 31:28 captures Jacob's impassioned rebuke of Laban, expressing profound indignation at being denied a proper farewell to his beloved children and highlighting Laban's manipulative and morally reprehensible conduct. This verse marks a pivotal moment in their strained relationship, as Jacob asserts his autonomy and calls out Laban's controlling behavior, setting the stage for their eventual, albeit uneasy, separation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is embedded within the dramatic confrontation between Jacob and Laban, following Jacob's clandestine departure from Paddan-Aram after twenty years of service. Having secretly fled with his wives, children, and possessions, Jacob is pursued by Laban for seven days, who finally overtakes him in the hill country of Gilead. The preceding verses Genesis 31:25-27 detail Laban's initial accusations, questioning Jacob's secret departure and expressing indignation at not being allowed to bid his daughters and grandchildren farewell with joy and music. Jacob's response in verse 28 directly refutes Laban's feigned concern, exposing the hypocrisy of his lament and highlighting his true, manipulative character. This exchange sets the stage for the subsequent search for Laban's stolen household gods (teraphim) and the eventual covenant between them.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, family bonds and proper farewells were deeply significant, often involving blessings, feasts, and public displays of affection. A secret departure, especially with family members, could be perceived as an act of theft or abduction, justifying pursuit. Laban's concern about not being allowed to "kiss" his daughters and grandchildren taps into this cultural expectation of proper familial goodbyes, yet his past actions contradict this sentiment. Furthermore, the patriarchal society granted fathers significant authority over their daughters and their marriages, which Laban had repeatedly exploited. Jacob's long servitude and Laban's constant manipulation of his wages Genesis 31:7 underscore the exploitative nature of their relationship, making Jacob's secret departure understandable, even if culturally unconventional.
  • Key Themes: Genesis 31:28 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. It powerfully illustrates Divine Sovereignty and Protection, as God intervenes to protect Jacob from Laban's potential harm Genesis 31:24 and guides him back to the promised land. The verse also highlights the pervasive theme of Human Sinfulness and Deceit, particularly through Laban's manipulative character, contrasting with Jacob's own journey of faith and flawed obedience. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of Family Bonds and Covenant, even amidst broken human relationships, as Jacob's passionate concern for his children demonstrates the enduring value of kinship within God's redemptive plan. The confrontation also foreshadows the Journey of Faith and Liberation, as Jacob's departure from Laban symbolizes a spiritual journey of freedom from oppressive circumstances, moving towards God's promised destiny.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • suffered (Hebrew, nâṭash', H5203): Meaning "to pound, i.e. smite; by implication (as if beating out, and thus expanding) to disperse; also, to thrust off, down, out or upon (inclusively, reject, let alone, permit, remit, etc.)." In this context, it signifies "to permit" or "to let alone." Jacob is accusing Laban of not permitting him the basic human decency of a farewell, implying Laban actively prevented or refused to allow this natural expression of affection.
  • kiss (Hebrew, nâshaq', H5401): Meaning "to kiss, literally or figuratively (touch)." This word denotes a tender, affectionate embrace, a common gesture of farewell and blessing in the ancient world. Jacob's lament emphasizes the emotional deprivation caused by Laban's actions, highlighting the profound personal loss of being denied this intimate moment with his children and grandchildren.
  • foolishly (Hebrew, çâkal', H5528): Meaning "to be silly; do (make, play the, turn into) fool(-ish, -ishly, -ishness)." This term, derived from the root for "fool," carries significant moral weight beyond mere lack of wisdom. It implies a moral deficiency, a contemptible or disgraceful act, often associated with rebellion against God or a disregard for proper conduct. Jacob's use of this word is a strong indictment, suggesting Laban's actions were not merely unwise but morally reprehensible and indicative of a character lacking in spiritual and ethical understanding.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And hast not suffered me to kiss my sons and my daughters?": This rhetorical question serves as Jacob's indignant protest and accusation against Laban. It highlights Laban's controlling and unloving behavior, which deprived Jacob of a fundamental and culturally expected act of farewell and affection towards his own children and grandchildren. Jacob's emphasis on "my sons and my daughters" underscores his paternal love and the deep emotional bond he shares with his family, which Laban had callously disregarded.
  • "thou hast now done foolishly in [so] doing.": This is Jacob's direct and forceful indictment of Laban's actions. The term "foolishly" (Hebrew, çâkal') elevates Laban's conduct beyond a simple error or oversight to a morally culpable and contemptible act. Jacob is not merely stating that Laban acted unwisely, but that his behavior was disgraceful, wicked, and demonstrated a profound lack of respect, affection, and moral discernment, particularly in denying a proper familial goodbye.

Literary Devices

The verse powerfully employs Rhetorical Question ("And hast not suffered me to kiss my sons and my daughters?") to convey Jacob's indignation and to expose the hypocrisy of Laban's earlier lament. This question is not seeking information but rather serves as a strong accusation, highlighting the obvious injustice and emotional deprivation inflicted upon Jacob. Following this, the direct Indictment ("thou hast now done foolishly in [so] doing") serves as a clear and unambiguous condemnation of Laban's character and actions. The use of the term "foolishly" (Hebrew, çâkal') functions as a form of Moral Denunciation, imbuing Laban's behavior with a deeper ethical failing beyond mere imprudence. This combination of rhetorical questioning and direct moral judgment effectively underscores the emotional intensity of the moment and Jacob's final assertion of autonomy against his manipulative father-in-law.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 31:28, while a personal exchange, resonates with profound theological truths about human relationships, divine oversight, and the nature of true wisdom. It reveals the destructive power of manipulation and greed, epitomized by Laban, and contrasts it with the deep, God-given value of family bonds. Jacob's passionate defense of his right to express affection to his children underscores the sanctity of familial love, a foundational element in God's design for humanity and the transmission of covenantal promises. Despite the brokenness of human interactions, God's protective hand is evident, ensuring His purposes for Jacob and his lineage will prevail.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 31:28 offers valuable insights for contemporary life, particularly concerning healthy relationships and the importance of closure. Jacob's desperate plea to kiss his children reminds us of the profound human need for proper goodbyes and the emotional pain that can result from their denial. Whether in family, friendships, or professional settings, denying closure can hinder healing and perpetuate resentment. Laban's manipulative behavior serves as a cautionary tale, urging us to recognize and resist controlling dynamics in our own lives, emphasizing the importance of establishing healthy boundaries and communicating openly and honestly. Furthermore, Jacob's unwavering love for his children, even amidst the turmoil, highlights the enduring strength of familial bonds and the biblical emphasis on nurturing these relationships. This passage encourages us to prioritize genuine affection and respect in our interactions, striving for reconciliation and peace, much like Jacob and Laban eventually form a covenant, allowing for forward movement.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might we, like Laban, inadvertently or intentionally deny others the opportunity for proper closure in relationships?
  • How can we cultivate healthier boundaries and communication patterns to avoid manipulative dynamics in our own lives?
  • What does Jacob's passionate defense of his family teach us about the value of familial love and connection in our own contexts?

FAQ

Why was Laban so determined to pursue Jacob?

Answer: Laban's intense pursuit of Jacob was driven by a complex mix of motives. Primarily, he was concerned about his missing household gods, the teraphim, which Rachel had stolen. These idols could have represented family inheritance rights or spiritual authority, making their loss significant. Beyond that, Laban likely felt deeply insulted and cheated by Jacob's secret departure, viewing it as an act of disrespect and a loss of control over his daughters and grandchildren. His greed also played a role, as he considered Jacob's accumulated wealth, gained through his service, as rightfully his own. He sought to reassert his authority and recover what he perceived as stolen property and family members.

What does the term 'foolishly' (nabal) tell us about Laban's character?

Answer: The Hebrew word nabal (נָבָל), translated as "foolishly" in the KJV, carries a much deeper and more severe connotation than simply lacking wisdom or making a mistake. It signifies moral depravity, wickedness, and a contemptible disregard for what is right, decent, or respectful, often implying a spiritual insensitivity or rebellion against God's ways. When Jacob declares that Laban "done foolishly," he is not merely criticizing Laban's poor judgment; he is condemning his character. It implies that Laban's actions—denying a proper farewell, attempting to reassert control, and his general manipulative behavior—were not just unwise, but morally reprehensible, indicative of a person who acts without regard for human decency, familial affection, or divine principles. This term is used elsewhere in Scripture to describe those who are morally bankrupt or spiritually senseless, such as Nabal in 1 Samuel 25:25.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 31:28 depicts a moment of human conflict and the brokenness of fallen relationships, it subtly points forward to the ultimate reconciliation and liberation found in Christ. Jacob's journey away from Laban's oppressive control foreshadows the believer's liberation from the bondage of sin and spiritual manipulation, a freedom fully realized through the atoning work of Jesus Christ. Just as God intervened to protect Jacob from Laban's harm and guided him safely toward the promised land, so too is Christ our faithful Shepherd and Protector, who leads His people through the wilderness of this world to their eternal inheritance. Laban's manipulative and unloving character serves as a stark reminder of humanity's fallen nature and the need for redemption, a redemption that is perfectly provided in Christ's perfect love and sacrifice on the cross. Furthermore, Jacob's passionate concern for his children and the emphasis on familial bonds point to the new family of God, forged through Christ's blood, where all relationships are healed, perfected, and eternally united in Him, transcending earthly farewells with the promise of eternal communion in the kingdom of God.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 31 verses 25–35

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here the reasoning, not to say the rallying, that took place between Laban and Jacob at their meeting, in that mountain which was afterwards called Gilead, Gen 31:25. Here is,

I. The high charge which Laban exhibited against him. He accuses him,

1.As a renegade that had unjustly deserted his service. To represent Jacob as a criminal, he will have it thought that he intended kindness to his daughters (Gen 31:27, Gen 31:28), that he would have dismissed them with all the marks of love and honour that could be, that he would have made a solemn business of it, would have kissed his little grandchildren (and that was all he would have given them), and, according to the foolish custom of the country, would have sent them away with mirth, and with songs, with tabret, and with harp: not as Rebekah was sent away out of the same family, above 120 years before, with prayers and blessings (Gen 24:60), but with sport and merriment, which was a sign that religion had very much decayed in the family, and that they had lost their seriousness. However, he pretends they would have been treated with respect at parting. Note, It is common for bad men, when they are disappointed in their malicious projects, to pretend that they designed nothing but what was kind and fair. When they cannot do the mischief they intended, they are loth it should be thought that they ever did intend it. When they have not done what they should have done they come off with this excuse, that they would have done it. Men may thus be deceived, but God cannot. He likewise suggests that Jacob had some bad design in stealing away thus (Gen 31:26), that he took his wives away as captives. Note, Those that mean ill themselves are most apt to put the worst construction upon what others do innocently. The insinuating and the aggravating of faults are the artifices of a designing malice, and those must be represented (though never so unjustly) as intending ill against whom ill is intended. Upon the whole matter, (1.) He boasts of his own power (Gen 31:29): It is in the power of my hand to do you hurt. He supposes that he had both right on his side (a good action, as we say, against Jacob) and strength on his side, either to avenge the wrong or recover the right. Note, Bad people commonly value themselves much upon their power to do hurt, whereas a power to do good is much more valuable. Those that will do nothing to make themselves amiable love to be thought formidable. And yet, (2.) He owns himself under the check and restraint of God's power; and, though it redounds much to the credit and comfort of Jacob, he cannot avoid telling him the caution God had given him the night before in a dream, Speak not to Jacob good nor bad. Note, As God has all wicked instruments in a chain, so when he pleases he can make them sensible of it, and force them to own it to his praise, as protector of the good, as Balaam did. Or we may look upon this as an instance of some conscientious regard felt by Laban for God's express prohibitions. As bad as he was he durst not injure one whom he saw to be the particular care of Heaven. Note, A great deal of mischief would be prevented if men would but attend to the caveats which their own consciences give them in slumberings upon the bed, and regard the voice of God in them.

2.As a thief, Gen 31:30. Rather than own that he had given him any colour of provocation to depart, he is willing to impute it to a foolish fondness for his father's house, which made him that he would needs begone; but then (says he) wherefore hast thou stolen my gods? Foolish man! to call those his gods that could be stolen! Could he expect protection from those that could neither resist nor discover their invaders? Happy are those who have the Lord for their God, for they have a God that they cannot be robbed of. Enemies may steal our goods, but not our God. Here Laban lays to Jacob's charge things that he knew not, the common distress of oppressed innocency.

II. Jacob's apology for himself. Those that commit their cause to God, yet are not forbidden to plead it themselves with meekness and fear. 1. As to the charge of stealing away his own wives he clears himself by giving the true reason why he went away unknown to Laban, Gen 31:31. He feared lest Laban would by force take away his daughters, and so oblige him, by the bond of his affection to his wives, to continue in his service. Note, Those that are unjust in the least, it may be suspected, will be unjust also in much, Luk 16:10. If Laban deceive Jacob in his wages, it is likely he will make no conscience of robbing him of his wives, and putting those asunder whom God has joined together. What may not be feared from men that have no principle of honesty? 2. As to the charge of stealing Laban's gods he pleads not guilty, Gen 31:32. He not only did not take them himself (he was not so fond of them), but he did not know that they were taken. Yet perhaps he spoke too hastily and inconsiderately when he said, "Whoever had taken them, let him not live;" upon this he might reflect with some bitterness when, not long after, Rachel who had taken them died suddenly in travail. How just soever we think ourselves to be, it is best to forbear imprecations, lest they fall heavier than we imagine.

III. The diligent search Laban made for his gods (Gen 31:33-35), partly out of hatred to Jacob, whom he would gladly have an occasion to quarrel with, partly out of love to his idols, which he was loth to part with. We do not find that he searched Jacob's flocks for stolen cattle; but he searched his furniture for stolen gods. He was of Micah's mind, You have taken away my gods, and what have I more? Jdg 18:24. Were the worshippers of false gods so set upon their idols? did they thus walk in the name of their gods? and shall not we be as solicitous in our enquires after the true God? When he has justly departed from us, how carefully should we ask, Where is God my Maker? O that I knew where I might find him! Job 23:3. Laban, after all his searches, missed of finding his gods, and was baffled in his enquiry with a sham; but our God will not only by found of those that seek him, but they shall find him their bountiful rewarder.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 25–35. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 31:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.