Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Laban went to shear his sheep: and Rachel had stolen the images that were her father's.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Laban H3837 went H1980 to shear H1494 his sheep H6629: and Rachel H7354 had stolen H1589 the images H8655 that were her father's H1.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Now Lavan had gone to shear his sheep, so Rachel stole the household idols that belonged to her father,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Now while Laban was out shearing his sheep, Rachel stole her father’s household idols.
Ask
American Standard Version
Now Laban was gone to shear his sheep: and Rachel stole the teraphim that were her father’s.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Now Laban had gone to shear his sheep: and Rachel stole the teraphim that were her father’s.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Whe Laban was gone to shere his sheepe, Then Rahel stole her fathers idoles.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Laban hath gone to shear his flock, and Rachel stealeth the teraphim which her father hath;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
The Migrations of Jacob (Part 1)
The Migrations of Jacob (Part 1) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 893 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 31:19 precisely sets the stage for Jacob's strategic departure from Laban, detailing Laban's absence for sheep shearing. This opportune moment is seized by Rachel, who secretly takes her father's household idols, known as teraphim. This act of theft not only facilitates Jacob's clandestine exodus but also foreshadows a tense confrontation and reveals the persistent spiritual struggles within Jacob's family as they journey towards the land of promise.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis 31:19 is a pivotal verse within the broader narrative of Jacob's departure from Laban, which spans Genesis 31. The preceding verses (Genesis 31:1-18) detail Jacob's growing discontent with Laban's changing demeanor and his perception of Laban's deceit, culminating in God's direct command for Jacob to return to his homeland. This divine directive provides the impetus for Jacob's secret flight. Verse 19 specifically describes the timing and a crucial detail of their departure, setting up the subsequent confrontation with Laban, who pursues Jacob upon discovering the theft of his teraphim (Genesis 31:22-29). Rachel's act directly precipitates the intense search and the dramatic encounter between Jacob and Laban.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The practice of sheep shearing was a significant annual event in ancient Near Eastern pastoral societies, often requiring the flock owner to travel to distant pastures and dedicate considerable time and resources to the task. This made Laban's absence in verse 19 a credible and strategic window for Jacob's escape. The "images" (Hebrew: teraphim) were household idols common in Mesopotamia. While their exact function varied, they were often associated with divination, protection, or, critically, with inheritance rights. Some scholars suggest that possession of teraphim could signify the right to family property or leadership, particularly in the absence of male heirs. Rachel's theft, therefore, might have been an attempt to secure a claim to her father's inheritance for Jacob or her children, or it could simply reflect a lingering attachment to pagan superstitions prevalent in her native culture, despite being part of Jacob's household, which was ostensibly dedicated to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes to several overarching themes in Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of divine providence and guidance, as God orchestrates Laban's absence to provide a clear path for Jacob's obedience to the command to return to Canaan, despite the human imperfections and deceptions involved. Secondly, the theft of the teraphim underscores the persistent challenge of idolatry versus true faith within the covenant family, a theme that re-emerges later when Jacob commands his household to put away foreign gods before approaching God at Bethel. Thirdly, the narrative continues the theme of familial deception and conflict, echoing Jacob's own earlier deceptions (Genesis 27) and Laban's repeated trickery (Genesis 29). Rachel's act adds another layer of dishonesty to the complex family dynamics, setting the stage for the dramatic pursuit and confrontation in Genesis 31.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • shear (Hebrew, gazâz', H1494): From the primitive root H1494, meaning "to cut off," specifically to shear a flock or shave hair. Figuratively, it can mean to destroy. In this context, it refers to the annual, labor-intensive process of removing wool from sheep, a significant event that would occupy Laban's full attention and take him away from home, thus creating the opportune moment for Jacob's departure.
  • stolen (Hebrew, gânab', H1589): From the primitive root H1589, meaning "to thieve" (literally or figuratively) or "to deceive." By implication, it means to "carry away," "secretly bring," or "get by stealth." Rachel's act is explicitly defined as a theft, emphasizing its clandestine and illicit nature, setting the stage for Laban's furious pursuit and the subsequent search for the missing items.
  • images (Hebrew, tᵉrâphîym', H8655): Plural from H8655, referring to "Teraphim," which were family idols or cultic objects. These were not merely decorative but held significant religious, cultural, and potentially legal importance in the ancient Near East, often associated with divination or signifying inheritance rights. Their theft by Rachel highlights a spiritual tension within Jacob's household and directly precipitates the dramatic confrontation with Laban.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Laban went to shear his sheep:" This clause establishes the critical timing for Jacob's secret departure. Laban's absence for sheep shearing was not a trivial errand but a significant annual undertaking that would draw him away from his home and fully occupy his attention, providing the necessary window of opportunity for Jacob and his family to flee without immediate detection. This detail underscores the strategic planning involved in their escape.
  • "and Rachel had stolen the images" This phrase reveals Rachel's specific, clandestine act during Laban's absence. The Hebrew verb "stolen" (gânab) emphasizes the secretive and illicit nature of her action. The "images" (teraphim) are the central objects of this theft, indicating their importance to Laban and foreshadowing the conflict that will ensue. Rachel's initiative in this act is notable, highlighting her agency within the narrative.
  • "that [were] her father's." This final clause clarifies the ownership of the stolen teraphim, emphasizing that they belonged to Laban. This detail is crucial for understanding Laban's subsequent furious pursuit of Jacob, as his "gods" were not merely possessions but held deep personal, cultural, and potentially legal significance for him, linking their loss directly to his perceived honor and patrimony.

Literary Devices

Genesis 31:19 employs several Literary Devices to enrich the narrative. The verse utilizes Foreshadowing, as Rachel's secretive act of stealing the teraphim directly sets the stage for the intense confrontation and search that dominates the latter half of Genesis 31. This seemingly minor detail becomes the central point of contention between Jacob and Laban. There is also an element of Irony present; while Jacob is fleeing Laban's deceitful practices, Rachel, a member of Jacob's own family, engages in an act of theft and deception, mirroring the very behavior they are trying to escape. This highlights the pervasive nature of human sin and the complex moral landscape of the patriarchal narratives. Furthermore, the verse uses Characterization to subtly reveal aspects of Rachel's personality—her resourcefulness, her potential lingering attachment to pagan practices, or perhaps her desire for a perceived inheritance claim. The mention of Laban's sheep shearing also serves as a Plot Device, providing the necessary logistical window for Jacob's escape, demonstrating divine timing even amidst human machinations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 31:19, while narrating a specific event, resonates with profound theological and thematic implications. It highlights the pervasive nature of idolatry even within the nascent covenant community, demonstrating that the struggle against false gods was not merely an external conflict but an internal one, deeply embedded within the family of Abraham. Rachel's attachment to the teraphim underscores the difficulty of fully shedding cultural and spiritual baggage when embracing a new path of faith, a tension that would persist throughout Israel's history. Yet, even amidst human deceit and spiritual compromise, the passage powerfully illustrates God's unwavering providence, orchestrating circumstances (Laban's absence) to ensure His covenant purposes for Jacob's return to the promised land are fulfilled.

  • Genesis 35:2: Jacob later commands his household to "put away the foreign gods," indicating the continued presence of idolatry within his family, a direct consequence of Rachel's actions in Genesis 31.
  • Judges 17:5: This verse illustrates the continued use of teraphim in Israelite society even much later, showing that the struggle against idolatry was a long-standing issue.
  • Hosea 3:4: This prophetic passage links the absence of teraphim with a period of spiritual desolation for Israel, suggesting their role in cultic practices, even if illicit.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 31:19 offers a compelling mirror for contemporary reflection. Rachel's act of stealing the teraphim serves as a potent reminder that our spiritual journeys are rarely linear or perfectly pure. Even when we commit to following God, lingering attachments to "idols"—whether tangible objects, personal ambitions, relational dependencies, or even deeply ingrained cultural superstitions—can subtly or overtly compete for our allegiance. This passage challenges us to honestly examine our own lives and "households" for anything that might subtly or overtly displace God from His rightful place of supreme authority and devotion. It calls us to consider what "images" we might be clinging to, perhaps for perceived security, control, or comfort, rather than fully trusting in God's provision and guidance. The narrative encourages a radical commitment to spiritual purity, urging us to actively "put away" anything that hinders our complete surrender to the one true God, trusting that His providence will guide us through all of life's complexities, even when our paths are imperfect.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "teraphim" or "images"—whether material possessions, relationships, or personal ambitions—might I be clinging to that subtly compete with my devotion to God?
  • How does this passage challenge my understanding of God's providence working through imperfect people and messy situations?
  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to use "stealth" or deception, rather than trusting God's timing and provision?

FAQ

What were the "images" (teraphim) that Rachel stole?

Answer: The "images" were teraphim (Hebrew: תְּרָפִים, H8655), which were household idols or cultic objects common in the ancient Near East. Their exact purpose is debated among scholars, but they were often associated with divination, used for consulting the future, or potentially served as symbols of family ownership and inheritance rights. They could vary in size, from small figurines to larger statues, and were considered significant family possessions.

Why did Rachel steal her father's teraphim?

Answer: The Bible does not explicitly state Rachel's motive, leaving it open to interpretation. Possible reasons include a lingering attachment to pagan superstitions for personal security or good fortune, reflecting her upbringing in Laban's idolatrous household. It could also have been an act of defiance or revenge against her father Laban, who had repeatedly deceived Jacob and withheld her dowry. Another widely discussed possibility, based on ancient Near Eastern legal customs, is that possessing teraphim might have been believed to secure inheritance rights for Jacob or her children, especially if Laban had no male heirs or if there was a dispute over property.

What does Laban's intense reaction to the theft of the teraphim reveal about him?

Answer: Laban's furious pursuit of Jacob and his thorough search for the teraphim (Genesis 31:30) reveal his deep attachment to them. This suggests that he valued them highly, whether for their perceived spiritual power, their economic value as property, or their significance as symbols of familial authority and inheritance rights. His reaction underscores his own idolatrous tendencies and materialism, prioritizing these objects—his "gods"—over the welfare of his daughters and son-in-law, and even over the covenant relationship he shared with Jacob. His pursuit is driven by the perceived loss of these idols, highlighting his spiritual priorities.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Genesis 31:19, with its depiction of Jacob's flight from Laban and Rachel's theft of the teraphim, subtly yet profoundly points to the redemptive work of Jesus Christ. Jacob's journey out of Laban's house, away from the influences of idolatry and deceit, and towards the promised land, serves as a powerful type of the spiritual exodus from sin and false gods that Christ accomplishes for His people. Just as God sovereignly orchestrated Laban's absence to enable Jacob's escape, so too does Christ, through His perfect sacrifice, free us from the bondage of sin and the allure of worldly idols, leading us into true worship and the inheritance of the heavenly Canaan. He is the ultimate deliverer who cleanses our "households" not merely of physical teraphim but of all spiritual idolatry—replacing our attachments to transient things with a singular devotion to God. Through Christ, we receive the promised inheritance, not through human cunning or stolen artifacts, but through grace and the perfect fulfillment of God's covenant, as we are made heirs with Him (Romans 8:17). He is our true security and the only one who can truly take away the sin of the world, including the idolatry of our hearts (John 1:29).

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 31 verses 17–24

Here is, I. Jacob's flight from Laban. We may suppose he had been long considering of it, and casting about in his mind respecting it; but when now, at last, God had given him positive orders to go, he made no delay, nor was he disobedient to the heavenly vision. The first opportunity that offered itself he laid hold of, when Laban was shearing his sheep (Gen 31:19), that part of his flock which was in the hands of his sons three days' journey off. Now, 1. It is certain that it was lawful for Jacob to leave his service suddenly, without giving a quarter's warning. It was not only justified by the particular instructions God gave him, but warranted by the fundamental law of self-preservation, which directs us, when we are in danger, to shift for our own safety, as far as we can do it without wronging our consciences. 2. It was his prudence to steal away unawares to Laban, lest, if Laban had known, he should have hindered him or plundered him. 3. It was honestly done to take no more than his own with him, the cattle of his getting, Gen 31:18. He took what Providence gave him, and was content with that, and would not take the repair of his damages into his own hands. Yet Rachel was not so honest as her husband; she stole her father's images (Gen 31:19) and carried them away with her. The Hebrew calls them teraphiam. Some think they were only little representations of the ancestors of the family, in statues or pictures, which Rachel had a particular fondness for, and was desirous to have with her, now that she was going into another country. It should rather seem that they were images for a religious use, penates, household-gods, either worshipped or consulted as oracles; and we are willing to hope (with bishop Patrick) that she took them away not out of covetousness of the rich metal they were made of, much less for her own use, or out of any superstitious fear lest Laban, by consulting his teraphim, might know which way they had gone (Jacob, no doubt, dwelt with his wives as a man of knowledge, and they were better taught than so), but out of a design hereby to convince her father of the folly of his regard to those as gods which could not secure themselves, Isa 46:1, Isa 46:2.

II. Laban's pursuit of Jacob. Tidings were brought him, on the third day, that Jacob had fled; he immediately raises the whole clan, takes his brethren, that is, the relations of his family, that were all in his interests, and pursues Jacob (as Pharaoh and his Egyptians afterwards pursued the seed of Jacob), to bring him back into bondage again, or with design to strip him of what he had. Seven days' journey he marched in pursuit of him, Gen 31:23. He would not have taken half the pains to have visited his best friends. But the truth is bad men will do more to serve their sinful passions than good men will to serve their just affections, and are more vehement in their anger than in their love. Well, at length Laban, overtook him, and the very night before he came up with him God interposed in the quarrel, rebuked Laban and sheltered Jacob, charging Laban not to speak unto him either good or bad (Gen 31:24), that is, to say nothing against his going on with his journey, for that it proceeded from the Lord. The same Hebraism we have, Gen 24:50. Laban, during his seven day's march, had been full of rage against Jacob, and was now full of hopes that his lust should be satisfied upon him (Exo 15:9); but God comes to him, and with one word ties his hands, though he does not turn his heart. Note, 1. In a dream, and in slumberings upon the bed, God has ways of opening the ears of men, and sealing their instruction, Job 33:15, Job 33:16. Thus he admonishes men by their consciences, in secret whispers, which the man of wisdom will hear and heed. 2. The safety of good men is very much owing to the hold God has of the consciences of bad men and the access he has to them. 3. God sometimes appears wonderfully for the deliverance of his people when they are upon the very brink of ruin. The Jews were saved from Haman's plot when the king's decree drew hear to be put in execution, Est 9:1.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 17–24. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON GENESIS 57.17
This was included not by chance but for us to know how they still clung to their ancestral habits and showed great devotion to the household gods. I mean, consider how [Rachel] went to so much trouble as to steal nothing else of her father’s than the household gods alone and did it without her husband noticing; Jacob would not have allowed it to happen, you see.
JeromeAD 420
Hebrew Questions on Genesis
(Verse 19) And Rachel stole her father's idols. Where we now read idols, it is written in Hebrew Theraphim, which Aquila interprets as μορφώματα, that is, figures or images. This is done so that we may understand what the word Theraphim means in the Book of Judges (17:5).
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 31:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.