Oecumenius

"receives a blessing from God." For the fruitful land is blessed by God. Who is the fruitful land? The virtuous man.
"producing thorns." He did not say "bearing [Τίκτουσα]," but "producing [Ἐκφέρουσα]," hinting at the unnaturalness of the production, as if he said, "spitting out [ἐκβράσσουσα]." And "producing" indicates the production until the end and death. For he did not say "carrying out [Ἐξενεγκοῦσα]," but "producing [Ἐκφέρουσα]"; note this.
And by thorns and thistles, he speaks of sin, because it strikes from all sides and corrupts the one who holds it.
"and near to a curse."He spoke of the greatest comfort. For he did not say, "It is a self-curse," but rather, "and near to a curse." And one who is near to a curse can also become far away through repentance. For if he had said, "And it is a curse," he would have had to despair. But now, he says, "and near to a curse," speaking in fear and with caution; "Behold, you have become near to the curse; be afraid lest you fall into it, and flee from it." For one who is near can also flee; for he has not yet been seized.
"whose end is for burning." See again how securely he speaks, lest it be thought that the greatest remedy among men casts out repentance. For he did not say, "He who has accepted thorns and thistles is burned," but rather, "whose end is for burning." If we endure until the end, he says, and carry out the thorns until the very end, then we will be burned, indicating by contrast that if we do not endure the thorns until the end, but change our minds, we will not be burned.

Having sufficiently struck them by calling them sluggish, and saying other things, he now comforts them; therefore he did not say, "I think," but "I am convinced."
"and things pertaining to salvation." Being near.
"even though we speak in this way." He says, I know that you will not produce thorns and thistles, but I strike only with words, so that I may make you stronger.
"For God is not unjust." Therefore, we are convinced of the good things concerning you, knowing that God is not unjust. If He is not unjust, He will not forget your good work and the love which you have shown in His name, having endured all for Him. So do not lose heart, but always hope for better things; for God is always righteous. Therefore, I have not spoken about you in a discouraging way; for I know that you are not worthy of curses.
“in serving the saints.”Greatly testifies to them, not only by works, but also by works done with eagerness; for serving is a sign of eagerness. To the saints, that is, to the faithful. For every believer is holy, even if he is of the world [κοσμικὸς]. But see how he ministers to them. For he did not say, having served, and stood; but added, and serving; that is, continuing to do the same.
This love that you continue to show, he says, "we desire [Επιθυμοῦμεν]." He did not say, "We want [βουλόμεθα]," but rather, it was more affectionate, "We desire," he says.
"to show the same diligence." Then someone might say, "If you are convinced about the better things concerning us, and you know our works and our ministry to the saints, why then were you afraid to call us sluggish, and remembering the thorns? Why? Because “we desire each one of you," he says, "to show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope until the end”, that is, to be steadfast in your faith in Christ and the hope that comes from it. And he did not say, We wish; which would have been a teaching authority; but, we desire; which is of paternal affection. For this is not something we wish in words only, but our soul burns for you. For such a thing is meant by the phrase, we desire.
"that you may not be sluggish." And this is also for their healing; for it leads them to the future time.And although he said above, "You have become sluggish," (Heb. 5:11) he then said to their listening ears, "but now, all of you have become sluggish."
"imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises." Then he lists those who inherited the promises through faith, such as Abraham. What is meant by "through patience"? That is, through endurance. For he endured the promise being set forth for so many years, and still remained believing. For if the gift were to follow immediately upon the promise of God, there would no longer be any need for faith or endurance on the part of the one receiving the promise, since God would be completely truthful. But if, having promised, he is delayed, and the one receiving the promise patiently waits for the delay, then he believes purely, then he endures with self-control.

Of those who through faith inherited the promises, many have died, but they were kept safe for others; he only remembers Abraham, both because of the dignity of his person and because he especially was deemed worthy and attained the promises. And through this, he shows that one should not be faint-hearted, but should wait for God, having the habit not to hastily bring about the promised things, but through a long time.
“He swore by Himself.” When did God swear by himself? In those very words, in which he says, "By myself I have sworn." (Gen. 22:16) Perhaps also the word "Amen" could be considered a divine oath; for "Amen," truly "Amen," signifies nothing else but a confirmation of the truth; and what else could truth be but God? Therefore, when you see Christ saying, "Amen, amen, I say to you," understand that he swears by having no one greater than himself, and the "Amen" is an oath, just as the Father also swears. Yet some have thought that the Son swears to Abraham; for the Word swears, "Amen, I will bless you." For Scripture says that the angel spoke to Abraham. But nowhere do they say that the Father is an angel, but the Son is the angel of the great counsel.
"And so, having patiently." You see that the patience of Abraham accomplished something? He said that by being patient he obtained the promise, in order to show the great power of patience, and that it was not the promise alone that accomplished everything; but also patience.
"he attained the promise." And yet in the end, it says that all these, having seen them from afar and embraced them, did not receive the promises, so that they would not be made perfect apart from us. How then does he say here, "he attained the promise?" And we say, he did not speak about the same things. For the things here he has given to him, concerning which he now spoke, but those there, he keeps, concerning which he says at the end of the Epistle, "And the end of all their opposition." (Heb. 12:3) And the end of all opposition and dispute to confirm the things spoken by him is the oath. Both, however, the obtaining and the not yet obtaining, serve as encouragement to the faint-hearted; the one, that we also, if we endure patiently, will obtain; the other, that, since he has not yet obtained it, though perfected many years ago, we who are still struggling are not foolish because we have not yet obtained it.
“an end of all dispute.” And the conclusion of all contradiction and dispute to confirm what is said is the oath. For indeed many things are spoken and disputed on each side; but the oath, coming last and confirming, resolves all doubts.

It was necessary, therefore, he says, to believe in God who had promised without an oath, but since God wanted to do something more, he mediated the promise by an oath.
"to show the firmness of His counsel." He also came to us. For we are the heirs of the promise, being the seed of Abraham; and if we are the seed, then we are also heirs.
“He mediated with an oath.” See what he prepares. That the Son was thereafter the mediator of God and men (for he has also become a mediator in the incarnation); and then he mediated with the Father and with Abraham, confirming him with an oath; for the Word was he who both spoke to Abraham and swore. The meaning of the interpretation is well-founded, so that it may be thus. God, that is, the Word, wanting to show the unchangeable nature of those glorifying the Father, mediated with the Father and with Abraham with an oath, that is, he became a mediator in the oath. For through him, as the Word, God and the Father swore.
"that by two unchangeable things." Two things, both that God has promised, and that He has added an oath to the promise. For since among men the oath seems more trustworthy, on account of this He also added it Himself.
"In which it is impossible." In which, instead of "from which," from these two things, the promise is shown to be most trustworthy, and it is impossible for God to lie. Therefore, just as He swore by us (although it is unworthy of Him to swear), so also understand the "from which" He learned what He suffered. For men also consider it more credible to come through experience.
"we might have a strong encouragement," That is, a great exhortation and urging.
"who have fled." To him, he says. "to hold,” let us have strong encouragementto lay hold to the hope set before us. From those, he says, that were said to Abraham, let us be faithful also to the things to come, and to the kingdom of heaven. For this is our hope, which now is set before us in expectation, but then will be realized, as it was said; From those things, this will be understood. There it was made true, that in these things we may believe. And that for this reason he swore then, that now we may believe concerning the things to come. For there was nothing else, he says, and the things then promised with oaths, or the future hope of the faithful.
"we have as an anchor," which stabilizes the wavering ships, and hope makes those who are shaken by temptations brave, committed, and patient.
"safe and committed." Not simply an anchor, but also safe and secure. For there is an anchor that does not keep the ship unshaken when it is smaller than it ought to be.
"which enters." In order that, he says, while we are still here, hope may enter into the kingdom of heaven, that is, so that we may already be in our hopes. See what hope does. It anticipates what is to come.
“enters into the inner sanctuary behind the curtain.” The inner part of the curtain is called heaven.
“where Jesus has entered as a forerunner on our behalf.” Having said that our hope enters into heaven, he confirms what has been said, trusting this by the facts. For Christ himself entered there; and not only did he enter, but he entered on our behalf. And where our forerunner has entered, there it is necessary for us also to enter. For the forerunner is the forerunner of those who follow; and the difference between the forerunner and those who follow is not very great, just as between John and Christ. Do not be disturbed, then; as long as we have not yet entered, we will enter where our forerunner is. The "on our behalf" is extended so that he may be called our forerunner. The fact that he entered in the flesh is on our behalf, so that we also, having flesh, may obtain entrance.
“Having become a high priest.” And this is a great encouragement, if indeed our high priest is above and much better than those among the Jews; first, in manner; for he is not according to their order, but according to the order of Melchizedek; then, in place and tabernacle; for he is above and in heaven; third, in the covenant; for it is upon greater and more perfect promises; likewise, in permanence; for he is eternal, and not temporary; lastly, in person; for he is the Son of God. Therefore, do not lose heart. And well is the term "having become," because it was according to the flesh that he became a high priest.

It now also wishes to show the great excellence of the New Testament over the Old: and it demonstrates this through the priests. Saying, "According to the order of Melchizedek," (Heb. 7:17) he indicates that Melchizedek himself, the type of Christ (for he calls him a type of Christ), He surpassed the legal priests who were among the Jews: asserting this, he said that if the type of Christ was superior to those that were among the Jews, how much more the truth, that is, Christ himself.
“king of Salem.” Name of a city.
"from the slaughter of the kings." When he returned after defeating the kings who had captured Lot. You know the history. (Gen. 14:1)
"and having blessed him [εὐλογήσας]." Instead of "he blessed him [εὐλόγησεν]."
"gave a tenth." That is, to Melchizedek, Abraham gave a tenth, he says.
"first being interpreted.” Therefore, he wants to show how Melchizedek is a type of Christ, and first he does this from the name. For, he says, his name is interpreted, king of righteousness; Melchizedek, king; Salem, peace. Of whom else could he be a type, except of Christ the true King of Righteousness?
Then he also mentions the other interpretation from the city. Salem is peace. Therefore, he is not only a king of righteousness, but also of peace, as from the city of which he reigned; both of these Christ is, being both King of Righteousness and King of Peace.
“without father, without mother.” Therefore, is it possible that this Melchizedek, being a man, is without father and without mother, and having neither beginning of days nor end of life? No. How then did he say this? Observe. For it could be objected to him: How is Christ according to the order of Melchizedek, who died and was not made a priest forever? See what he says: “We do not know,” he says, “who he has as father or mother, or what lineage Melchizedek is, nor when he was born, or when he died.” And what does this matter? Someone might say: “although we do not know these things, since they are not mentioned in Scripture, nevertheless he had both a father and lineage, and birth and death.”
How then is such a one without father and mother, and having no beginning or end of life? And he says: Just as Melchizedek, because he is not genealogically recorded in Scripture, appears to us who are ignorant to have no parents, nor beginning or end of life, so Christ truly is. For just as we do not know the beginning and end of Melchizedek, so neither truly do we know those of Christ; but the former because it is not written, the latter because of the truth; for the type is not equal in all things to the truth (since he himself is found to be truth, and identity rather than type); but he has certain images and likenesses; for example, Melchizedek is without father according to our ignorance, Christ is without father in his earthly birth; for according to the flesh he was born only of the Virgin Mary; Melchizedek is without mother, Christ is without mother in his heavenly birth, in which he had neither beginning of days; for how could the maker of time have a beginning? For he was begotten from the Father alone before all ages, ineffably and unthinkably. And thus understand all things that Melchizedek had, which we are ignorant of concerning him, these things Christ truly has. For Melchizedek is a king of peace and righteousness even to the bare names; but Christ truly is so.

"but made like the Son of God." And where is the similarity? That both Melchizedek and Christ, the end is unknown and the beginning. But for Melchizedek, it is because it has not been written, and for Christ, it is because it does not exist.
"abides a priest forever." In this way, accept the eternal, as well as the others. For he says, as far as it relates to us who are ignorant of when he died, he has set aside the priesthood, he is a priest forever. For the type of indistinct images preserves the original; or that the manner of the priesthood of Melchizedek (you know what I mean) remains forever.
"Consider how great this man was." Since he applied the type to the truth, he wishes to show that the type of Christ himself, namely Melchizedek, was greater than those priests among the Jews. And what do I say about the priests? He was indeed greater than the patriarch Abraham himself. If the type of Christ, he says, is greater than the patriarch himself, what then could anyone say about Christ? In one way, Abraham was greater than Melchizedek, but the type was the one who conquers. Thus, Cyril among the saints in the second book concerning On Adoration in Spirit and Truth…
"‘to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth.’ It is not to be said, he says, that he gave him tithes, as one who has shared in the war; (for this is why he said above, ‘who met Abraham returning from the slaughter), but according to reverence and honor, just as giving first fruits. ‘gave a tenth of the spoils.’ From the loot and plunder. And if he is greater than the patriarch (and this is indicated by the giving of tithes), much more than those among the Jewish priests. For the patriarch is not brought forth without reason: but to show that if the patriarch, he says, has given, what is to be said about the priests?"