TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Exodus 22:16–24. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Here is, I. A law that he who debauched a young woman should be obliged to marry her, Exo 22:16, Exo 22:17. If she was betrothed to another, it was death to debauch her (Deu 22:23, Deu 22:24); but the law here mentioned respects her as single. But, if the father refused her to him, he was to give satisfaction in money for the injury and disgrace he had done her. This law puts an honour upon marriage and shows likewise how improper a thing it is that children should marry without their parents' consent: even here, where the divine law appointed the marriage, both as a punishment to him that had done wrong and a recompence to her that had suffered wrong, yet there was an express reservation for the father's power; if he denied his consent, it must be no marriage.
II.A law which makes witchcraft a capital crime, Exo 22:18.
Witchcraft not only gives that honour to the devil which is due to God alone, but bids defiance to the divine Providence, wages war with God's government, and puts his work into the devil's hand, expecting him to do good and evil, and so making him indeed the god of this world; justly therefore was it punished with death, especially among a people that were blessed with a divine revelation, and cared for by divine Providence above any people under the sun. By our law, consulting, covenanting with, invocating, or employing, any evil spirit, to any intent whatsoever, and exercising any enchantment, charm, or sorcery, whereby hurt shall be done to any person whatsoever, is made felony, without benefit of clergy; also pretending to tell where goods lost or stolen may be found, or the like, is an iniquity punishable by the judge, and the second offence with death. The justice of our law herein is supported by the law of God recorded here.
III.Unnatural abominations are here made capital; such beasts in the shape of men as are guilty of them are unfit to live (Exo 22:19): Whosoever lies with a beast shall die.
IV.Idolatry is also made capital, Exo 22:20.
God having declared himself jealous in this matter, the civil powers must be jealous in it too, and utterly destroy those persons, families, and places of Israel, that worshipped any god, save the Lord: this law might have prevented the woeful apostasies of the Jewish nation in after times, if those that should have executed it had not been ringleaders in the breach of it.
V.A caution against oppression.
Because those who were empowered to punish other crimes were themselves most in danger of this, God takes the punishing of it into his own hands.
1.Strangers must not be abused (Exo 22:21), not wronged in judgment by the magistrates, not imposed upon in contracts, nor must any advantage be taken of their ignorance or necessity; no, nor must they be taunted, trampled upon, treated with contempt, or upbraided with being strangers; for all these were vexations, and would discourage strangers from coming to live among them, or would strengthen their prejudices against their religion, to which, by all kind and gentle methods, they should endeavour to proselyte them. The reason given why they should be kind to strangers is, "You were strangers in Egypt, and knew what it was to be vexed and oppressed there," Note,
(1.)Humanity is one of the laws of religion, and obliges us particularly to be tender of those that lie most under disadvantages and discouragements, and to extend our compassionate concern to strangers, and those to whom we are not under the obligations of alliance or acquaintance. Those that are strangers to us are known to God, and he preserves them, Psa 146:9.
(2.)Those that profess religion should study to oblige strangers, that they may thereby recommend religion to their good opinion, and take heed of doing any thing that may tempt them to think ill of it or its professors, Pe1 2:12.
(3.)Those that have themselves been in poverty and distress, if Providence enrich and enlarge them, ought to show a particular tenderness towards those that are now in such circumstances as they were in formerly, doing now by them as they then wished to be done by.
2.Widows and fatherless must not be abused (Exo 22:22): You shall not afflict them, that is, "You shall comfort and assist them, and be ready upon all occasions to show them kindness." In making just demands from them, their condition must be considered, who have lost those that should deal for them, and protect them; they are supposed to be unversed in business, destitute of advice, timorous, and of a tender spirit, and therefore must be treated with kindness and compassion; no advantage must be taken against them, nor any hardship put upon them, from which a husband or a father would have sheltered them. For,
(1.)God takes particular cognizance of their case, Exo 22:23. Having no one else to complain and appeal to, they will cry unto God, and he will be sure to hear them; for his law and his providence are guardians to the widows and fatherless, and if men do not pity them, and will not hear them, he will. Note, It is a great comfort to those who are injured and oppressed by men that they have a God to go to who will do more than give them the hearing; and it ought to be a terror to those who are oppressive that they have the cry of the poor against them, which God will hear. Nay,
(2.)He will severely reckon with those that do oppress them. Though they escape punishments from men, God's righteous judgments will pursue and overtake them, Exo 22:24. Men that have a sense of justice and honour will espouse the injured cause of the weak and helpless; and shall not the righteous God do it? Observe the equity of the sentence here passed upon those that oppress the widows and fatherless: their wives shall become widows, and their children fatherless; and the Lord is known by these judgments, which he sometimes executes still.
Continue studying Exodus 22:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Exodus 22:17 delineates the legal recourse when a man seduces an unbetrothed virgin, particularly addressing the father's right to reject the ensuing marriage. Even in such a refusal, the law unequivocally mandates that the seducer must pay a standard "dowry of virgins," serving as a critical form of restitution for the profound damage inflicted upon the woman's honor and her family's reputation, thereby upholding principles of justice, accountability, and the protection of the vulnerable within ancient Israelite society.
Context
Literary Context
Exodus 22:17 is an integral component of the "Book of the Covenant" found in Exodus 20:22-23:33, a divinely revealed corpus of civil and ceremonial laws given to Moses immediately following the foundational Ten Commandments. This specific verse directly builds upon and qualifies the preceding statute in Exodus 22:16, which initially stipulates that a seducer of an unbetrothed virgin must marry her and pay a dowry. Verse 17 introduces a crucial caveat: the father's ultimate prerogative to reject this forced marriage. This sequential presentation highlights the meticulous and comprehensive nature of Mosaic law, anticipating various scenarios and ensuring that justice and appropriate compensation are administered even when the primary prescribed solution (marriage) is not deemed suitable by the injured party's family. The broader context of Exodus 22 encompasses a wide array of civil laws concerning property rights, personal injury, and social ethics, reflecting God's profound concern for order, equity, and the well-being of His covenant community.
Historical & Cultural Context
In ancient Near Eastern societies, including Israel, a woman's virginity was of paramount importance, intrinsically linked to her honor, her family's reputation, and her future marriageability. Marriage was predominantly an arrangement between families, with the father exercising significant patriarchal authority over his daughter's life and marital prospects. Seduction, especially of an unbetrothed virgin, was not merely a private transgression but a public offense that brought profound shame upon the woman and her entire family, significantly diminishing her value in the marriage market. The "dowry" (Hebrew: mohar) was a customary payment from the groom to the bride's father, signifying the groom's commitment, compensating the family for the loss of their daughter's labor, and demonstrating his ability to provide for his wife. The law in Exodus 22:17 acknowledges the father's ultimate right to protect his daughter's interests and the family's honor, even if it meant refusing a marriage that would otherwise be legally mandated. This refusal did not, however, absolve the seducer of responsibility; the payment of the dowry served as a necessary restitution for the irreparable damage to the woman's status and the family's honor, reflecting a pragmatic approach to justice in a society where a woman's social standing was intrinsically linked to her marital status. This principle of compensation for harm is also evident in other Mosaic laws, such as those found in Deuteronomy 22:28-29, which prescribes a similar payment for rape.
Key Themes
This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within the Book of the Covenant and the wider Pentateuch. It powerfully underscores the theme of Divine Justice and Equity, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for fairness and the protection of the vulnerable within society, particularly those who might otherwise be exploited or dishonored. The law also highlights the theme of Personal Accountability, holding the seducer responsible for his actions and mandating restitution, even when the preferred outcome (marriage) is not realized. Furthermore, it reinforces the theme of Sanctity of Sexual Purity and Marriage, emphasizing the high value God places on virginity and the integrity of marital relationships, viewing their violation as a serious offense against both individuals and the community. The father's authority also reflects the broader theme of Familial Honor and Protection, where the patriarchal head is entrusted with safeguarding the well-being and reputation of his household. The provision for compensation, even in refusal, speaks to the overarching theme of Restitution and Reparation in Mosaic law, ensuring that victims of wrongdoing receive tangible redress for their suffering, as seen in other laws like those in Leviticus 6:2-5.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
From Strong's H3985, this primitive root signifies a strong, emphatic refusal or rejection. In this context, it implies a deliberate and firm decision on the part of the father, indicating that his "utter refusal" is not a casual objection but a definitive and binding denial of the proposed marriage. This highlights the father's absolute authority in matters concerning his daughter's marital future and the severity of the offense that would lead to such a decisive rejection. The doubling of the verb (Hebrew: ma'en yema'en) intensifies the refusal, emphasizing its unyielding nature.
From Strong's H4119, this term refers to a price (for a wife). The môhar was a customary payment made by the prospective groom (or his family) to the bride's father. It was not a "purchase price" for the woman herself, but rather a compensation to the family for the loss of their daughter's labor and presence, an affirmation of the groom's commitment, and a demonstration of his ability to provide for his wife. The phrase "dowry of virgins" (מֹהַר הַבְּתוּלֹת, mohar ha'betulot) specifically refers to the standard, expected amount for a virgin bride, which, as stipulated in Deuteronomy 22:29, was 50 shekels of silver. This payment served as a form of restitution for the damage inflicted upon the woman's honor and her family's reputation, even if the marriage did not proceed.
Verse Breakdown
"If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him"
This protasis (the "if" clause) establishes the specific condition under which the subsequent legal consequence is triggered. It underscores the father's ultimate and decisive authority regarding his daughter's marital arrangements. The emphatic "utterly refuse" (Hebrew: ma'en yema'en) conveys a strong, non-negotiable rejection of the seducer as a suitable husband. This refusal is not arbitrary but likely stems from the profound dishonor or unsuitability perceived by the father, despite the seducer's legal obligation to marry her according to the preceding verse (Exodus 22:16). It signifies that the father's right to protect his family's honor outweighs the seducer's obligation to marry.
"he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins"
This apodosis (the "then" clause) specifies the mandatory consequence for the seducer when the marriage is refused. Even though he is not permitted to marry the woman, he is still held financially accountable for his actions. The "money according to the dowry of virgins" refers to the standard compensation expected for a virgin bride, typically 50 shekels of silver (Deuteronomy 22:29). This payment serves as a crucial form of restitution for the damage done to the woman's honor, reputation, and future marriage prospects. It acknowledges the lasting harm caused by the seduction, even if the primary legal remedy (marriage) is rejected by the injured party's family, ensuring that the perpetrator bears the financial burden of his offense.
Literary Devices
The legal text of Exodus 22:17 primarily employs Casuistic Law, characterized by its conditional "if... then..." structure. This form of Legal Prescription clearly delineates specific circumstances and their corresponding legal consequences, leaving no ambiguity about the required action. The use of the infinitive absolute with the finite verb in "utterly refuse" (Hebrew: ma'en yema'en) serves as an Intensification, emphasizing the father's absolute and unyielding rejection. This linguistic device highlights the gravity of the father's decision and the severity of the offense that would provoke such a response. Furthermore, the underlying principle of Restitutionary Justice is a key legal device, where a financial penalty is imposed to compensate for harm, even when full restoration of the initial state (e.g., marriage) is impossible. The law's precision in specifying "the dowry of virgins" also functions as a form of Legal Precision, referencing a well-understood customary value and ensuring equitable compensation.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Exodus 22:17 profoundly reveals God's unwavering concern for justice, the protection of the vulnerable, and the sanctity of covenant relationships within the community. While the specific customs of dowry and patriarchal authority are culturally bound to ancient Israel, the underlying divine principles are timeless and universally applicable. This law powerfully demonstrates that actions have consequences, and those who cause harm, particularly to the vulnerable, are held accountable. It underscores the divine imperative for restitution and compensation for damages, even when full restoration of the original state is impossible. The law also highlights the immense value God places on sexual purity and integrity, not merely as a social custom but as a foundational ethical standard that impacts individuals, families, and the broader community. It reflects a divine order where justice is pursued not just through punishment, but also through mechanisms that seek to mitigate harm, uphold the dignity of the injured party, and restore a measure of equity in the face of wrongdoing.
Reflection and Application
While the direct application of a dowry system is not normative in most contemporary societies, the enduring principles embedded in Exodus 22:17 offer profound insights for believers today. This passage calls us to a deep sense of personal accountability for our actions, recognizing that our choices, particularly those involving sexual ethics, have far-reaching consequences on others, their dignity, and their future. It challenges us to consider how we, as individuals and as the church, are called to protect the vulnerable among us, advocating for justice and providing pathways for healing and restitution when harm occurs. Furthermore, the law's emphasis on the "dowry of virgins" underscores the biblical value of sexual purity and integrity, not as a legalistic burden, but as a commitment to honoring God's design for relationships and respecting the intrinsic worth of every individual. This calls us to cultivate a culture of respect, responsibility, and righteousness in all our interactions, reflecting the character of a just and holy God who champions the cause of the oppressed and values the purity of His people.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What was the "dowry of virgins" and why was it so important?
The "dowry of virgins" (Hebrew: mohar ha'betulot) referred to the standard, customary payment made by a prospective groom to the father of a virgin bride. As specified in Deuteronomy 22:29, this amount was typically 50 shekels of silver. Its importance was multi-faceted: it compensated the bride's family for the loss of her labor and presence; it demonstrated the groom's commitment and ability to provide for his wife; and crucially, in cases of seduction or rape, it served as a form of restitution for the profound damage inflicted upon the woman's honor, reputation, and future marriage prospects. In ancient Israelite society, a woman's virginity was paramount to her social standing and marriageability, so its loss, especially outside of marriage, brought significant shame and disadvantage. The dowry payment, even if the father refused the marriage, was a legal recognition of this damage and a mandated compensation.
Why did the father have the right to refuse the marriage, even if the seducer was willing to marry his daughter?
In ancient Israelite society, fathers held significant patriarchal authority over their daughters, particularly regarding marital arrangements. While Exodus 22:16 stipulated that a seducer must marry the unbetrothed virgin he defiled and pay a dowry, Exodus 22:17 introduces the father's prerogative to "utterly refuse" this union. This right was crucial for protecting the family's honor and the daughter's long-term well-being. A father might refuse the marriage if the seducer was deemed unsuitable, dishonorable, or if the union would bring further disgrace upon the family. The law recognized that forcing such a marriage could exacerbate the harm rather than mitigate it. Even with the refusal, the seducer was still obligated to pay the "dowry of virgins" as restitution for the damage caused, ensuring accountability and compensation despite the marriage not proceeding. This highlights the law's concern for the victim's dignity and the family's honor above merely enforcing a marriage.
How does this law relate to the broader concept of justice in the Old Testament?
This law exemplifies several key aspects of Old Testament justice. Firstly, it demonstrates a profound concern for the protection of the vulnerable, specifically women, ensuring that they are not left without recourse when wronged. Secondly, it highlights the principle of restitution and compensation for harm inflicted, rather than solely focusing on punitive measures. The payment of the dowry serves as a tangible form of restoration for the injured party, acknowledging the real-world consequences of the offense. This aligns with other laws in the Torah that mandate compensation for various damages, such as those found in Exodus 21. Thirdly, it underscores the importance of personal accountability, holding the seducer responsible for his actions even when the desired outcome (marriage) is prevented by the injured party's family. Ultimately, it reflects God's character as a righteous judge who cares for order, equity, and the well-being of His covenant people, as further elaborated in prophetic calls for justice like Amos 5:24.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
While Exodus 22:17 addresses specific civil laws for ancient Israel, its underlying principles find profound Christ-centered fulfillment, revealing God's enduring concern for justice, purity, and the restoration of humanity. The law's emphasis on restitution for a defiled virgin powerfully foreshadows the ultimate cost of sin and the perfect, redemptive work of Christ. Humanity, in its fallen state, is spiritually compromised, having lost its original purity and honor before a holy God. We are like the "defiled virgin," utterly unable to restore ourselves or pay the immense "dowry" required for reconciliation. Yet, God, in His infinite love, did not "refuse" us but provided the ultimate "dowry"—the precious blood of His Son, Jesus Christ. Just as the earthly dowry compensated for lost honor, Christ's sacrifice on the cross fully pays the infinite price for our sin, restoring our relationship with God and conferring upon us a new, unblemished purity (Ephesians 5:25-27). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, making full atonement where no human restitution could ever suffice. Furthermore, the law's protection of the vulnerable points to Christ as our ultimate Protector and Advocate, who continually intercedes for us (Hebrews 7:25) and whose kingdom justice extends far beyond mere financial compensation to encompass spiritual renewal, eternal life, and complete restoration (Romans 6:23). In Christ, the principles of accountability, restitution, and the valuing of purity are perfectly fulfilled, not through a legal payment from us, but through His gracious, complete, and unmerited payment on our behalf, making us pure and spotless before God (Colossians 1:21-22).