Exodus 22:17

KJV

If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

KJV (with Strong's)

If her father {H1} utterly {H3985} refuse {H3985} to give {H5414} her unto him, he shall pay {H8254} money {H3701} according to the dowry {H4119} of virgins {H1330}.

Complete Jewish Bible

But if her father refuses to give her to him, he must pay a sum equivalent to the bride-price for virgins.

Berean Standard Bible

If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, the man still must pay an amount comparable to the bridal price of a virgin.

American Standard Version

If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him, he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins.

Commentary

### SUMMARY
Exodus 22:17 delineates the legal recourse when a man seduces an unbetrothed virgin, particularly addressing the father's right to reject the ensuing marriage. Even in such a refusal, the law unequivocally mandates that the seducer must pay a standard "dowry of virgins," serving as a critical form of restitution for the profound damage inflicted upon the woman's honor and her family's reputation, thereby upholding principles of justice, accountability, and the protection of the vulnerable within ancient Israelite society.

### CONTEXT
* **Literary Context:** Exodus 22:17 is an integral component of the "Book of the Covenant" found in [Exodus 20:22-23:33](/exodus/20-22-23-33 "Exodus 20:22-23:33 - The Book of the Covenant"), a divinely revealed corpus of civil and ceremonial laws given to Moses immediately following the foundational Ten Commandments. This specific verse directly builds upon and qualifies the preceding statute in [Exodus 22:16](/exodus/22-16 "Exodus 22:16 - Law Regarding Seduction"), which initially stipulates that a seducer of an unbetrothed virgin must marry her and pay a dowry. Verse 17 introduces a crucial caveat: the father's ultimate prerogative to reject this forced marriage. This sequential presentation highlights the meticulous and comprehensive nature of Mosaic law, anticipating various scenarios and ensuring that justice and appropriate compensation are administered even when the primary prescribed solution (marriage) is not deemed suitable by the injured party's family. The broader context of [Exodus 22](/exodus/22 "Exodus 22 - Laws on Property and Personal Injury") encompasses a wide array of civil laws concerning property rights, personal injury, and social ethics, reflecting God's profound concern for order, equity, and the well-being of His covenant community.

* **Historical & Cultural Context:** In ancient Near Eastern societies, including Israel, a woman's virginity was of paramount importance, intrinsically linked to her honor, her family's reputation, and her future marriageability. Marriage was predominantly an arrangement between families, with the father exercising significant patriarchal authority over his daughter's life and marital prospects. Seduction, especially of an unbetrothed virgin, was not merely a private transgression but a public offense that brought profound shame upon the woman and her entire family, significantly diminishing her value in the marriage market. The "dowry" (Hebrew: *mohar*) was a customary payment from the groom to the bride's father, signifying the groom's commitment, compensating the family for the loss of their daughter's labor, and demonstrating his ability to provide for his wife. The law in [Exodus 22:17](/exodus/22-17 "Exodus 22:17 - Father's Refusal and Dowry") acknowledges the father's ultimate right to protect his daughter's interests and the family's honor, even if it meant refusing a marriage that would otherwise be legally mandated. This refusal did not, however, absolve the seducer of responsibility; the payment of the dowry served as a necessary restitution for the irreparable damage to the woman's status and the family's honor, reflecting a pragmatic approach to justice in a society where a woman's social standing was intrinsically linked to her marital status. This principle of compensation for harm is also evident in other Mosaic laws, such as those found in [Deuteronomy 22:28-29](/deuteronomy/22-28-29 "Deuteronomy 22:28-29 - Law on Rape and Dowry"), which prescribes a similar payment for rape.

* **Key Themes:** This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within the Book of the Covenant and the wider Pentateuch. It powerfully underscores the theme of **Divine Justice and Equity**, demonstrating God's meticulous concern for fairness and the protection of the vulnerable within society, particularly those who might otherwise be exploited or dishonored. The law also highlights the theme of **Personal Accountability**, holding the seducer responsible for his actions and mandating restitution, even when the preferred outcome (marriage) is not realized. Furthermore, it reinforces the theme of **Sanctity of Sexual Purity and Marriage**, emphasizing the high value God places on virginity and the integrity of marital relationships, viewing their violation as a serious offense against both individuals and the community. The father's authority also reflects the broader theme of **Familial Honor and Protection**, where the patriarchal head is entrusted with safeguarding the well-being and reputation of his household. The provision for compensation, even in refusal, speaks to the overarching theme of **Restitution and Reparation** in Mosaic law, ensuring that victims of wrongdoing receive tangible redress for their suffering, as seen in other laws like those in [Leviticus 6:2-5](/leviticus/6-2-5 "Leviticus 6:2-5 - Laws of Restitution for Sins Against Others").

### EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

#### Key Word Analysis
* **Refuse (Hebrew, _mâʼên'_):** From Strong's H3985, this primitive root signifies a strong, emphatic refusal or rejection. In this context, it implies a deliberate and firm decision on the part of the father, indicating that his "utter refusal" is not a casual objection but a definitive and binding denial of the proposed marriage. This highlights the father's absolute authority in matters concerning his daughter's marital future and the severity of the offense that would lead to such a decisive rejection. The doubling of the verb (Hebrew: *ma'en yema'en*) intensifies the refusal, emphasizing its unyielding nature.
* **Dowry (Hebrew, _môhar'_):** From Strong's H4119, this term refers to a price (for a wife). The *môhar* was a customary payment made by the prospective groom (or his family) to the bride's father. It was not a "purchase price" for the woman herself, but rather a compensation to the family for the loss of their daughter's labor and presence, an affirmation of the groom's commitment, and a demonstration of his ability to provide for his wife. The phrase "dowry of virgins" (מֹהַר הַבְּתוּלֹת, *mohar ha'betulot*) specifically refers to the standard, expected amount for a virgin bride, which, as stipulated in [Deuteronomy 22:29](/deuteronomy/22-29 "Deuteronomy 22:29 - Dowry for a Virgin"), was 50 shekels of silver. This payment served as a form of restitution for the damage inflicted upon the woman's honor and her family's reputation, even if the marriage did not proceed.

#### Verse Breakdown
* **"If her father utterly refuse to give her unto him":** This protasis (the "if" clause) establishes the specific condition under which the subsequent legal consequence is triggered. It underscores the father's ultimate and decisive authority regarding his daughter's marital arrangements. The emphatic "utterly refuse" (Hebrew: *ma'en yema'en*) conveys a strong, non-negotiable rejection of the seducer as a suitable husband. This refusal is not arbitrary but likely stems from the profound dishonor or unsuitability perceived by the father, despite the seducer's legal obligation to marry her according to the preceding verse ([Exodus 22:16](/exodus/22-16 "Exodus 22:16 - Marriage Obligation")). It signifies that the father's right to protect his family's honor outweighs the seducer's obligation to marry.
* **"he shall pay money according to the dowry of virgins":** This apodosis (the "then" clause) specifies the mandatory consequence for the seducer when the marriage is refused. Even though he is not permitted to marry the woman, he is still held financially accountable for his actions. The "money according to the dowry of virgins" refers to the standard compensation expected for a virgin bride, typically 50 shekels of silver (cf. [Deuteronomy 22:29](/deuteronomy/22-29 "Deuteronomy 22:29 - Dowry Amount")). This payment serves as a crucial form of restitution for the damage done to the woman's honor, reputation, and future marriage prospects. It acknowledges the lasting harm caused by the seduction, even if the primary legal remedy (marriage) is rejected by the injured party's family, ensuring that the perpetrator bears the financial burden of his offense.

#### Literary Devices
The legal text of Exodus 22:17 primarily employs **Casuistic Law**, characterized by its conditional "if... then..." structure. This form of **Legal Prescription** clearly delineates specific circumstances and their corresponding legal consequences, leaving no ambiguity about the required action. The use of the infinitive absolute with the finite verb in "utterly refuse" (Hebrew: *ma'en yema'en*) serves as an **Intensification**, emphasizing the father's absolute and unyielding rejection. This linguistic device highlights the gravity of the father's decision and the severity of the offense that would provoke such a response. Furthermore, the underlying principle of **Restitutionary Justice** is a key legal device, where a financial penalty is imposed to compensate for harm, even when full restoration of the initial state (e.g., marriage) is impossible. The law's precision in specifying "the dowry of virgins" also functions as a form of **Legal Precision**, referencing a well-understood customary value and ensuring equitable compensation.

### THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Exodus 22:17 profoundly reveals God's unwavering concern for justice, the protection of the vulnerable, and the sanctity of covenant relationships within the community. While the specific customs of dowry and patriarchal authority are culturally bound to ancient Israel, the underlying divine principles are timeless and universally applicable. This law powerfully demonstrates that actions have consequences, and those who cause harm, particularly to the vulnerable, are held accountable. It underscores the divine imperative for restitution and compensation for damages, even when full restoration of the original state is impossible. The law also highlights the immense value God places on sexual purity and integrity, not merely as a social custom but as a foundational ethical standard that impacts individuals, families, and the broader community. It reflects a divine order where justice is pursued not just through punishment, but also through mechanisms that seek to mitigate harm, uphold the dignity of the injured party, and restore a measure of equity in the face of wrongdoing.

* [Deuteronomy 22:28-29](/deuteronomy/22-28-29 "Deuteronomy 22:28-29 - Law on Rape and Dowry")
* [Leviticus 6:2-5](/leviticus/6-2-5 "Leviticus 6:2-5 - Laws of Restitution for Sins Against Others")
* [Proverbs 6:27-29](/proverbs/6-27-29 "Proverbs 6:27-29 - Consequences of Adultery")

### REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While the direct application of a dowry system is not normative in most contemporary societies, the enduring principles embedded in Exodus 22:17 offer profound insights for believers today. This passage calls us to a deep sense of personal accountability for our actions, recognizing that our choices, particularly those involving sexual ethics, have far-reaching consequences on others, their dignity, and their future. It challenges us to consider how we, as individuals and as the church, are called to protect the vulnerable among us, advocating for justice and providing pathways for healing and restitution when harm occurs. Furthermore, the law's emphasis on the "dowry of virgins" underscores the biblical value of sexual purity and integrity, not as a legalistic burden, but as a commitment to honoring God's design for relationships and respecting the intrinsic worth of every individual. This calls us to cultivate a culture of respect, responsibility, and righteousness in all our interactions, reflecting the character of a just and holy God who champions the cause of the oppressed and values the purity of His people.

#### Questions for Reflection
* **How does this passage challenge my understanding of personal accountability for my actions, especially those that might cause harm or dishonor to others?**
* **In what ways can I, or my community of faith, actively protect and advocate for the vulnerable, ensuring justice and dignity are upheld in contemporary contexts?**
* **How does the biblical emphasis on sexual purity and the value of honor, as seen in this law, inform my understanding of healthy relationships and personal integrity today?**

### FAQ
**What was the "dowry of virgins" and why was it so important?**

Answer: The "dowry of virgins" (Hebrew: *mohar ha'betulot*) referred to the standard, customary payment made by a prospective groom to the father of a virgin bride. As specified in [Deuteronomy 22:29](/deuteronomy/22-29 "Deuteronomy 22:29 - Dowry Amount"), this amount was typically 50 shekels of silver. Its importance was multi-faceted: it compensated the bride's family for the loss of her labor and presence; it demonstrated the groom's commitment and ability to provide for his wife; and crucially, in cases of seduction or rape, it served as a form of restitution for the profound damage inflicted upon the woman's honor, reputation, and future marriage prospects. In ancient Israelite society, a woman's virginity was paramount to her social standing and marriageability, so its loss, especially outside of marriage, brought significant shame and disadvantage. The dowry payment, even if the father refused the marriage, was a legal recognition of this damage and a mandated compensation.

**Why did the father have the right to refuse the marriage, even if the seducer was willing to marry his daughter?**

Answer: In ancient Israelite society, fathers held significant patriarchal authority over their daughters, particularly regarding marital arrangements. While [Exodus 22:16](/exodus/22-16 "Exodus 22:16 - Law of Seduction") stipulated that a seducer must marry the unbetrothed virgin he defiled and pay a dowry, [Exodus 22:17](/exodus/22-17 "Exodus 22:17 - Father's Right to Refuse") introduces the father's prerogative to "utterly refuse" this union. This right was crucial for protecting the family's honor and the daughter's long-term well-being. A father might refuse the marriage if the seducer was deemed unsuitable, dishonorable, or if the union would bring further disgrace upon the family. The law recognized that forcing such a marriage could exacerbate the harm rather than mitigate it. Even with the refusal, the seducer was still obligated to pay the "dowry of virgins" as restitution for the damage caused, ensuring accountability and compensation despite the marriage not proceeding. This highlights the law's concern for the victim's dignity and the family's honor above merely enforcing a marriage.

**How does this law relate to the broader concept of justice in the Old Testament?**

Answer: This law exemplifies several key aspects of Old Testament justice. Firstly, it demonstrates a profound concern for the **protection of the vulnerable**, specifically women, ensuring that they are not left without recourse when wronged. Secondly, it highlights the principle of **restitution and compensation** for harm inflicted, rather than solely focusing on punitive measures. The payment of the dowry serves as a tangible form of restoration for the injured party, acknowledging the real-world consequences of the offense. This aligns with other laws in the Torah that mandate compensation for various damages, such as those found in [Exodus 21](/exodus/21 "Exodus 21 - Laws on Servants, Violence, and Property"). Thirdly, it underscores the importance of **personal accountability**, holding the seducer responsible for his actions even when the desired outcome (marriage) is prevented by the injured party's family. Ultimately, it reflects God's character as a righteous judge who cares for order, equity, and the well-being of His covenant people, as further elaborated in prophetic calls for justice like [Amos 5:24](/amos/5-24 "Amos 5:24 - Let Justice Roll Down").

### CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While Exodus 22:17 addresses specific civil laws for ancient Israel, its underlying principles find profound Christ-centered fulfillment, revealing God's enduring concern for justice, purity, and the restoration of humanity. The law's emphasis on restitution for a defiled virgin powerfully foreshadows the ultimate cost of sin and the perfect, redemptive work of Christ. Humanity, in its fallen state, is spiritually compromised, having lost its original purity and honor before a holy God. We are like the "defiled virgin," utterly unable to restore ourselves or pay the immense "dowry" required for reconciliation. Yet, God, in His infinite love, did not "refuse" us but provided the ultimate "dowry"—the precious blood of His Son, Jesus Christ. Just as the earthly dowry compensated for lost honor, Christ's sacrifice on the cross fully pays the infinite price for our sin, restoring our relationship with God and conferring upon us a new, unblemished purity (cf. [Ephesians 5:25-27](/ephesians/5-25-27 "Ephesians 5:25-27 - Christ and the Church")). He is the [Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world](/john/1-29 "John 1:29 - Jesus, the Lamb of God"), making full atonement where no human restitution could ever suffice. Furthermore, the law's protection of the vulnerable points to Christ as our ultimate Protector and Advocate, who continually intercedes for us ([Hebrews 7:25](/hebrews/7-25 "Hebrews 7:25 - Christ Our Intercessor")) and whose kingdom justice extends far beyond mere financial compensation to encompass spiritual renewal, eternal life, and complete restoration ([Romans 6:23](/romans/6-23 "Romans 6:23 - The Wages of Sin and Gift of God")). In Christ, the principles of accountability, restitution, and the valuing of purity are perfectly fulfilled, not through a legal payment from us, but through His gracious, complete, and unmerited payment on our behalf, making us pure and spotless before God ([Colossians 1:21-22](/colossians/1-21-22 "Colossians 1:21-22 - Reconciliation Through Christ")).

Note: Commentary is generated by AI with a directive for Biblical fidelity. Always rely on the Holy Spirit for discernment. The Scripture text and cross-references are from verified, non-AI sources.

Cross-References

Genesis 34:12

Ask me never so much dowry and gift, and I will give according as ye shall say unto me: but give me the damsel to wife.

1 Samuel 18:25

And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines.

Deuteronomy 22:29

Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty [shekels] of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

Deuteronomy 7:3

Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.

Deuteronomy 7:4

For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.

Genesis 23:16

¶ And Abraham hearkened unto Ephron; and Abraham weighed to Ephron the silver, which he had named in the audience of the sons of Heth, four hundred shekels of silver, current [money] with the merchant.