コンテンツへスキップ

Deuteronomy 19:6

“The Law of Cities of Refuge”· Deuteronomy 19:1–13Read in context
King James Version
Lest the avenger of the blood pursue the slayer, while his heart is hot, and overtake him, because the way is long, and slay him; whereas he was not worthy of death, inasmuch as he hated him not in time past.
KJV (with Strong's)
Lest the avenger H1350 of the blood H1818 pursue H7291 the slayer H310 H7523, while H3588 his heart H3824 is hot H3179, and overtake H5381 him, because the way H1870 is long H7235, and slay H5221 him H5315; whereas he was not worthy H4941 of death H4194, inasmuch as H3588 he hated H8130 him not in time H8543 past H8032.
Complete Jewish Bible
Otherwise the next-of-kin avenger, in the heat of his anger, may pursue the killer, overtake him because the distance [to the city of refuge] is long, and strike him dead - even though he didn't deserve to die, inasmuch as he hadn't hated him in the past.
Berean Standard Bible
Otherwise, the avenger of blood might pursue the manslayer in a rage, overtake him if the distance is great, and strike him dead though he did not deserve to die, since he did not intend any harm.
American Standard Version
lest the avenger of blood pursue the manslayer, while his heart is hot, and overtake him, because the way is long, and smite him mortally; whereas he was not worthy of death, inasmuch as he hated him not in time past.
World English Bible Messianic
Otherwise, the avenger of blood might pursue the man slayer, while his heart is hot, and overtake him, because the way is long, and strike him mortally; even though he was not worthy of death, because he didn’t hate him in time past.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Least the auenger of the blood follow after the manslayer, while his heart is chafed, and ouertake him, because the way is long, and slaie him, although he be not worthy of death, because he hated him not in time passed.
Young's Literal Translation
lest the redeemer of blood pursue after the man-slayer when his heart is hot, and hath overtaken him (because the way is great), and hath smitten him--the life, and he hath no sentence of death, for he is not hating him heretofore;
日本語 · 口語訳
そうしなければ、復讐する者が怒って、その殺した者を追いかけ、道が長いために、ついに追いついて殺すであろう。しかし、その人は以前から彼を憎んでいた者でないから、殺される理由はない。
Translation
In the KJVVerse 5,413 of 31,102 · 17.4%

Study this verse

Summary

Deuteronomy 19:6 delineates the urgent necessity for cities of refuge, providing a critical legal safeguard for individuals who have unintentionally caused another's death. The verse vividly illustrates the peril faced by such a person from the "avenger of the blood," who, driven by raw grief and immediate anger, might impulsively pursue and slay the slayer before a proper legal determination of intent can be made. This divine provision underscores the Mosaic Law's commitment to due process, distinguishing between premeditated murder and accidental manslaughter based on the absence of prior malice, thereby ensuring that justice is administered with both precision and mercy.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is an integral component of the broader legal exposition found in Deuteronomy 19, specifically within the detailed instructions concerning the establishment and function of the cities of refuge (verses 1-13). Following the initial command to designate these sanctuaries in Deuteronomy 19:1-3, verses 4-6 present a concrete scenario illustrating the precise circumstances for which these cities were intended: an accidental killing without malicious intent. This immediate narrative flow clarifies the crucial distinction between intentional murder, which mandated capital punishment, and unintentional manslaughter, which necessitated refuge and a fair trial. The passage subsequently outlines the strict consequences for a premeditated murderer who attempts to flee to a city of refuge, emphasizing that such an individual should not be protected (Deuteronomy 19:11-13).

Historical & Cultural Context

In the ancient Near East, including Israel, the practice of blood vengeance was a deeply entrenched social custom. The "avenger of the blood" (Hebrew: go'el haddam) was typically the closest male relative of the deceased, whose sacred duty it was to restore family honor and balance by pursuing and executing the killer. While this system provided a form of retributive justice, it was inherently susceptible to impulsive and potentially unjust retaliation, particularly in cases of accidental death. The Mosaic Law, through the innovative institution of the cities of refuge, introduced a revolutionary legal safeguard. This system of due process meticulously distinguished between premeditated murder and unintentional killing, thereby protecting the innocent from summary execution and preventing the unchecked escalation of blood feuds. This legal refinement reflected a more sophisticated and divinely ordained system of justice than was prevalent in the surrounding pagan cultures, emphasizing a nuanced approach to culpability.

Key Themes

Deuteronomy 19:6 powerfully illuminates several core themes. Foremost is Justice and Due Process, underscoring God's unwavering demand for righteous judgment that meticulously differentiates between intent and accident. It highlights the Protection of the Innocent, providing a vital mechanism for those who caused accidental death to escape immediate, unregulated vengeance, thereby demonstrating God's profound compassion even for individuals who commit tragic errors. Furthermore, the verse emphasizes the Restraint of Vengeance, as the cities of refuge served to regulate the ancient custom of blood vengeance, channeling it through a structured legal framework rather than permitting uncontrolled retaliation. This divinely instituted system reflects God's desire for an orderly and just society where mercy tempers judgment, preventing the innocent from suffering the fate of the guilty, a principle echoed throughout the Mosaic Law, such as in the statutes concerning homicide in Exodus 21:12-14.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Avenger gâʼal' H1350

This primitive root means "to redeem" according to the Oriental law of kinship. It refers to the nearest kinsman (go'el) who had the right and responsibility to act on behalf of his family. In the context of homicide, the go'el haddam (avenger of blood) was tasked with avenging the death of a relative. However, the Mosaic Law carefully regulated this ancient custom, ensuring that the avenger's actions were legitimate only in cases of intentional murder, thereby preventing arbitrary or unjust retaliation.

Hot yâcham' H3179

This primitive root means "to be hot" or "to conceive." In this context, "while his heart is hot" (with lêbâb, H3824, for "heart") vividly describes the intense, immediate emotional state of the avenger. It signifies a burning rage, grief, and an impulsive desire for retribution, highlighting the danger posed by an avenger acting solely on raw, unreasoning emotion without the benefit of legal deliberation.

Hated sânêʼ' H8130

This primitive root means "to hate (personally)." The phrase "hated him not in time past" is the crucial legal criterion for distinguishing manslaughter from murder. It signifies the complete absence of any prior malice, animosity, or premeditation on the part of the slayer. This lack of pre-existing hatred is the definitive factor that classifies the killing as unintentional, making the slayer "not worthy of death" and eligible for sanctuary within a city of refuge.

Verse Breakdown

"Lest the avenger of the blood pursue the slayer"

This opening clause immediately establishes the central conflict and the underlying purpose of the cities of refuge. It highlights the inherent and urgent danger posed to the slayer by the go'el haddam, whose cultural and legal duty was to pursue and execute the killer of his kinsman. The use of "lest" signifies a preventative measure, emphasizing the critical and time-sensitive nature of the provision for refuge.

"while his heart is hot, and overtake him, because the way is long, and slay him"

This segment paints a dramatic and perilous picture of the avenger's relentless pursuit. "While his heart is hot" vividly conveys the avenger's intense emotional state—a combination of profound grief and unbridled rage—which drives an impulsive, unreasoning desire for immediate retribution. The subsequent phrase, "because the way is long," provides a practical justification for the establishment of multiple, strategically located cities of refuge, ensuring that the slayer could reach safety before being overtaken. The grim outcome, "and slay him," underscores the lethal consequence if refuge is not reached in time, highlighting the life-or-death urgency of the situation.

"whereas he [was] not worthy of death, inasmuch as he hated him not in time past"

This final and pivotal clause provides the legal and moral justification for the slayer's protection. It declares the slayer "not worthy of death," signifying that the act was not a capital offense deserving of execution. The definitive reason provided, "inasmuch as he hated him not in time past," establishes the critical legal criterion: the complete absence of any prior malice, premeditation, or pre-existing enmity. This nuanced distinction between unintentional killing and premeditated murder is foundational to the Mosaic legal system's commitment to precise, equitable, and divinely guided judgment.

Literary Devices

Deuteronomy 19:6 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its urgent message and legal precision. Vivid Imagery is powerfully utilized in phrases such as "while his heart is hot," which evokes the raw, unbridled emotion of the avenger, creating an immediate sense of danger and urgency. The description of "the way is long" further enhances this imagery, emphasizing the practical necessity for accessible cities of refuge. Legal Precision is profoundly evident in the meticulous distinction drawn between unintentional killing and murder, particularly through the crucial phrase "hated him not in time past." This phrase functions as a clear and unambiguous legal criterion, showcasing the Israelite legal system's emphasis on discerning intent. Finally, the verse employs Contrast by juxtaposing the impulsive, potentially unjust act of the avenger with the divinely ordained system of refuge. This contrast highlights the superiority of God's justice, which ensures due process and prevents the death of one "not worthy of death," over uncontrolled human vengeance.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Deuteronomy 19:6 profoundly illustrates God's multi-faceted character as both just and merciful, establishing a legal framework that tempers the ancient custom of blood vengeance with divine wisdom. It reveals a God who demands accountability for human life, underscoring its sanctity, but who also compassionately provides a means of protection for those who, through tragic accident and without malicious intent, cause another's death. This system of refuge prefigures the broader theological truth that God consistently provides a way of escape and a place of safety for those who seek it, especially when facing the dire consequences of actions not born of malicious intent. It underscores the importance of a legal system that values intent and provides due process, reflecting God's own righteous and compassionate judgment.

Reflection and Application

Deuteronomy 19:6, though deeply rooted in ancient legal and cultural customs, offers enduring principles for contemporary life and spiritual reflection. It challenges us to consider the profound importance of intent in our judgments of others, urging us to look beyond immediate outcomes and to diligently discern the heart and motivations behind actions. In a world often characterized by swift condemnation and "cancel culture," this verse serves as a powerful reminder of the divine call for due process, careful discernment, and the tempering of justice with compassion. Spiritually, it functions as a potent metaphor for the ultimate refuge we find in God. Just as the unintentional slayer found physical protection from an avenger, so too do believers find spiritual refuge in Christ from the just condemnation of sin. It encourages us to cultivate a spirit of empathy, to advocate for fair and equitable treatment for all, and to recognize that true justice is not merely punitive but also restorative and protective, reflecting the very nature of God, who is our ultimate sanctuary in times of accusation and distress.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the emphasis on "intent" in this verse challenge our modern tendencies toward quick judgment or "cancel culture" in our society?
  2. In what practical ways can we, as individuals or within our communities, embody the principles of "refuge" and "due process" in our daily interactions with others?
  3. How does the divine provision of cities of refuge demonstrate God's perfect balance of justice and mercy, and what does this teach us about His unchanging character?

FAQ

What was the primary distinction ancient Israelite law made between murder and manslaughter, as highlighted in Deuteronomy 19:6?

Deuteronomy 19:6, in conjunction with other passages like Numbers 35:22-25, clearly distinguishes between premeditated murder and unintentional killing (manslaughter) based fundamentally on the presence or absence of prior malice or hatred. For an act to be classified as manslaughter, the slayer must not have "hated him not in time past." This criterion means there was no pre-existing animosity, no intent to harm, and the death occurred purely by accident, such as an axe head flying off its handle while cutting wood (Deuteronomy 19:5). Conversely, if there was prior hatred, a deliberate ambush, or any clear intent to kill, the act was considered murder. In such cases, the killer was not afforded protection in a city of refuge but was to be handed over to the avenger of blood for execution (Deuteronomy 19:11-13). This crucial distinction ensured that justice was administered fairly, preventing innocent individuals from being executed by the "avenger of the blood" and upholding the sanctity of life with nuanced judgment.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Deuteronomy 19:6, with its vivid depiction of the urgent flight to a city of refuge from the pursuing avenger of blood, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the New Testament. The "avenger of the blood" can be seen as a powerful type of the just claims of God's holy law against sin, which unequivocally demands a life for a life, declaring that "the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23). Humanity, having universally sinned, stands justly condemned and is indeed "worthy of death" in a spiritual sense. However, just as the unintentional slayer found physical protection, so too does fallen humanity find ultimate and eternal refuge in Jesus Christ. He is our true and perfect "city of refuge," providing a secure sanctuary from the righteous wrath of God against sin. The writer of Hebrews speaks of believers having "fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us" (Hebrews 6:18). Christ, as our great High Priest, not only atones for our sins, making us "not worthy of death" in the spiritual and eternal sense, but also intercedes for us, perpetually protecting us from the ultimate judgment. His sacrificial death on the cross, the shedding of His own precious blood, fully satisfies the demands of divine justice, disarming the "avenger" of spiritual death and offering eternal life to all who, by faith, flee to Him (Colossians 2:13-14). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, providing a refuge that is not limited by distance or time, but is eternally accessible through faith alone (John 1:29).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Deuteronomy 19:1–13. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 13 verses
Passage under commentDeuteronomy 19:1–13
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

It was one of the precepts given to the sons of Noah that whoso sheddeth man's blood by man shall his blood be shed, that is, by the avenger of blood, Gen 9:6. Now here we have the law settled between blood and blood, between the blood of the murdered and the blood of the murderer, and effectual provision made,

I.That the cities of refuge should be a protection to him that slew another casually, so that he should not die for that as a crime which was not his voluntary act, but only his unhappiness. The appointment of these cities of refuge we had before (Exo 21:13), and the law laid down concerning them at large, Num 35:10, etc. It is here repeated, and direction is given concerning three things: -

1.The appointing of three cities in Canaan for this purpose. Moses had already appointed three on that side Jordan which he saw the conquest of; and now he bids them, when they should be settled in the other part of the country, to appoint three more, Deu 19:1-3, Deu 19:7. The country was to be divided into three districts, as near by as might be equal, and a city of refuge in the centre of each so that every corner of the land might have one within reach. Thus Christ is not a refuge at a distance, which we must ascend to heaven or go down to the deep for, but the word is nigh us, and Christ in the word, Rom 10:8. The gospel brings salvation to our door, and there it knocks for admission. To make the flight of the delinquent the more easy, the way must be prepared that led to the city of refuge. Probably they had causeways or street-ways leading to those cities, and the Jews say that the magistrates of Israel, upon one certain day in the year, sent out messengers to see that those roads were in good repair, and they were to remove stumbling-blocks, mend bridges that were broken, and, where two ways met, they were to set up a Mercurial post, with a finger to point the right way, on which was engraven in great letters, Miklat, Miklat - Refuge, Refuge. In allusion to this, gospel ministers are to show people the way to Christ, and to assist and direct them in flying by faith to him for refuge. They must be ready to remove their prejudices, and help them over their difficulties. And, blessed be God, the way of holiness, to all that seek it faithfully, is a highway so plain that the wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein.

2.The use to be made of these cities, Deu 19:4-6.

(1.)It is supposed that it might so happen that a man might be the death of his neighbour without any design upon him either from a sudden passion or malice prepense, but purely by accident, as by the flying off of an axe-head, which is the instance here given, with which every case of this kind was to be compared, and by it adjudged. See how human life lies exposed daily, and what deaths we are often in, and what need therefore we have to be always ready, our souls being continually in our hands. How are the sons of men snared in an evil time, when it falls suddenly upon them! Ecc 9:12. An evil time indeed it is when this happens not only to the slain but to the slayer.

(2.)It is supposed that the relations of the person slain would be forward to avenge the blood, in affection to their friend and in zeal for public justice. Though the law did not allow the avenging of any other affront or injury with death, yet the avenger of blood, the blood of a relation, shall have great allowances made for the heat of his heart upon such a provocation as that, and his killing only, should not be accounted murder if he did it before he got to the city of refuge, though it is owned he was not worthy of death. Thus would God possess people with a great horror and dread of the sin of murder: if mere chance-medley did thus expose a man, surely he that wilfully does violence to the blood of any person, whether from an old grudge or upon a sudden provocation, must flee to the pit, and let no man stay him (Pro 28:17); yet the New Testament represents the sin of murder as more heinous and more dangerous than even this law does. Jo1 3:15, You know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.

(3.)It is provided that, if an avenger of blood should be so unreasonable as to demand satisfaction for blood shed by accident only, then the city of refuge should protect the slayer. Sins of ignorance indeed do expose us to the wrath of God, but there is relief provided, if by faith and repentance we make use of it. Paul that had been a persecutor obtained mercy, because he did it ignorantly; and Christ prayed for his crucifiers, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.

3.The appointing of three cities more for this use in case God should hereafter enlarge their territories and the dominion of their religion, that all those places which came under the government of the law of Moses in other instances might enjoy the benefit of that law in this instance, Deu 19:8-10. Here is,

(1.)An intimation of God's gracious intention to enlarge their coast, as he had promised to their fathers, if they did not by their disobedience forfeit the promise, the condition of which is here carefully repeated, that, if it were not performed, the reproach might lie upon them, and not on God. He promised to give it, if thou shalt keep all these commandments; not otherwise.

(2.)A direction to them to appoint three cities more in their new conquests, which, the number intimates, should be as large as their first conquests were; wherever the border of Israel went this privilege must attend it, that innocent blood be not shed, Deu 19:10. Though God is the saviour and preserver of all men, and has a tender regard to all lives, yet the blood of Israelites is in a particular manner precious to him, Psa 72:14. The learned Ainsworth observes that the Jewish writers themselves own that, the condition not being performed, the promise of the enlarging of their coast was never fulfilled; so that there was no occasion for ever adding these three cities of refuge; yet the holy blessed God (say they) did not command it in vain, for in the days of Messiah the prince three other cities shall be added to these six: they expect it to be fulfilled in the letter, but we know that in Christ it has its spiritual accomplishment, for the borders of the gospel Israel are enlarged according to the promise, and in Christ, the Lord our righteousness, refuge is provided for those that by faith flee to him.

II.It is provided that the cities of refuge should be no sanctuary or shelter to a wilful murderer, but even thence he should be fetched, and delivered to the avenger of blood, Deu 19:11-13.

1.This shows that wilful murder must never be protected by the civil magistrate; he bears the sword of justice in vain if he suffers those to escape the edge of it that lie under the guilt of blood, which he by office is the avenger of. During the dominion of the papacy in our own land, before the Reformation, there were some churches and religious houses (as they called them) that were made sanctuaries for the protection of all sorts of criminals that fled to them, wilful murderers not excepted, so that (as Stamford says, in his Pleas of the Crown, lib. II. c. 38) the government follows not Moses but Romulus, and it was not till about the latter end of Henry VIII's time that this privilege of sanctuary for wilful murder was taken away, when in that, as in other cases, the word of God came to be regarded more than the dictates of the see of Rome. And some have thought it would be a completing of that instance of reformation if the benefit of clergy were taken away for man-slaughter, that is, the killing of a man upon a small provocation, since this law allowed refuge only in case of that which our law calls chance-medley.

2.It may be alluded to to show that in Jesus Christ there is no refuge for presumptuous sinners, that go on still in their trespasses. If we thus sin wilfully, sin and go on in it, there remains no sacrifice, Heb 10:26. Those that flee to Christ from their sins shall be safe in him, but not those that expect to be sheltered by him in their sins. Salvation itself cannot save such: divine justice will fetch them even from the city of refuge, the protection of which they are not entitled to.

Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Deuteronomy 19:6 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8