Skip to content
Share this page

Acts 22:1

“Paul's Defense and Jewish Credentials”Acts 22:1–5

King James Version
Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
Men G435, brethren G80, and G2532 fathers G3962, hear ye G191 my G3450 defence G627 which I make now G3568 unto G4314 you G5209.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
“Brothers and fathers, listen now to my defense before you.”

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
Brethren and fathers, hear ye the defence which I now make unto you.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
“Brothers and fathers, listen to the defense which I now make to you.”

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
Ye men, brethren and Fathers, heare my defence nowe towards you.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
`Men, brethren, and fathers, hear my defence now unto you;' --

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
11 Greek words
  1. ἌνδρεςAndresMenG435N-VPMNoun Vocative Plural Masculine
  2. ἀδελφοὶadelphoibrothersG80N-VPMNoun Vocative Plural Masculine
  3. καὶkaiandG2532CONJConjunction
  4. πατέρεςpateresfathersG3962N-VPMNoun Vocative Plural Masculine
  5. ἀκούσατέakousatedo hearG191V-AAM-2PVerb Aorist Active Imperative 2nd Plural
  6. μουmouof meG3165P-1GSPersonal pronoun Genitive 1st Singular
  7. τῆςtēstheG3588T-GSFDefinite article Genitive Singular Feminine
  8. πρὸςprostoG4314PREPPreposition
  9. ὑμᾶςhumasyouG4771P-2APPersonal pronoun Accusative 2nd Plural
  10. νυνὶnuninowG3570ADVAdverb
  11. ἀπολογίαςapologiasdefenseG627N-GSFNoun Genitive Singular Feminine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF
Overview of Paul's Journeys
Overview of Paul's Journeys View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,706 of 31,102 · 89.1%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Paul opens his defense by addressing the crowd that had tried to kill him as men, brethren and fathers, and asks them to hear the account he now gives.

“Men, brethren, and fathers,”

A respectful address to a Jewish assembly. anḗr speaks to the men in general, adelphós to them as kin, and patḗr honours the elders and leaders.

“hear ye my defence”

akoúō asks them to give audience, and apología is a spoken defence that clears his name.

“which I make now unto you.”

He speaks at once and directly to the people who had accused him.

Passage studyActs 22:1–5

Paul Defends Himself as a Zealous Jew

1Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you. 2(And when they heard that he spake in the Hebrew tongue to them, they kept the more silence: and he saith,) 3I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. 4And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women. 5As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished.

Summary

Rescued by Roman soldiers from a mob in the temple courts, Paul stands on the steps of the barracks and speaks to the people who wanted him dead. He calls them men, brethren and fathers, asks them to hear his defence, and speaks in the Hebrew tongue, so the crowd grows quieter still. Then he tells them who he was: a Jew born in Tarsus, brought up in Jerusalem at the feet of Gamaliel, taught the law of the fathers exactly, and as zealous for God as they are. He persecuted the Way to the death, bound men and women, and carried letters from the high priest and the council to Damascus to bring believers back for punishment. These five verses prepare for his account of meeting the risen Christ, and they show how far God’s grace reached when it took hold of him.

How Paul gains a hearing from a furious crowd

Acts 21 tells how Paul came back to Jerusalem, wanting to show that he still kept the customs of his people. Jews from Asia accused him of teaching against the law and of bringing Gentiles into the temple, and the crowd was beating him when the Roman tribune, Claudius Lysias, stepped in and carried him off to the barracks (Acts 21:27–36). Paul spoke to the tribune in Greek, which surprised him, told him he was a Jew of Tarsus, and asked leave to speak to the people (Acts 21:37–40). These verses are the opening of what he said, and the whole speech runs through Acts 22.

Men, brethren, and fathers

“Men, brethren, and fathers” was a traditional and respectful way to address a Jewish assembly. “Men” (anḗr) speaks to the men of the crowd in general. “Brethren” (adelphós, a brother, near or remote) claims the bond of one people and one heritage. “Fathers” (patḗr) means a father, and the word also covers parents and ancestors. Here it is a title of honour for the older men and leaders, those with authority among the people. The address moves from the general to the bond of kinship and then to respect for their elders, and Paul offers it to men who had just tried to tear him apart.

That gentleness in the face of hatred is part of what the verse teaches. Paul is innocent and sent by God, yet he opens with courtesy and claims common ground before he says anything hard. He later wrote that he became all things to all men in order to win some (1 Corinthians 9:19–23), and here he lives it out. He also asks for something he will ask for again and again through his trials, beginning before the council in Acts 23: a fair hearing.

Hear ye my defence

“Hear ye” is akoúō, to hear in various senses, which includes to give audience. Paul asks them to listen to him with attention. “Defence” is apología, a plea, an answer for oneself, a clearing of oneself. Our word “apology” comes from it, and here it keeps its older meaning: a reasoned account given to clear his name. He means to explain and defend what he has done, and he stands by the facts. “Which I make now unto you” points to this moment and these hearers. He speaks directly to the very people who accused him and stood ready to condemn him.

Why the crowd fell quieter

When the people heard that he spoke to them “in the Hebrew tongue”, they became stiller than before. The phrase joins Hebraḯs, the Hebrew or Jewish language, to diálektos, a mode of speech, a language or dialect. In Jerusalem at this time, Aramaic was the language of everyday life, Greek was the common tongue of the empire, and Hebrew was used mainly for Scripture and learned study. So the “Hebrew tongue” here was most likely Aramaic, the speech of the Jews of Judea, and that is what the crowd recognised. The verb for “heard” is the same akoúō that Paul used in verse 1.

Hearing their own language changed how they saw him. They had been told that he had abandoned the customs of his people (Acts 21:28), and now a man who might have been taken for a foreigner or a Greek-speaking apostate addressed them as one of their own. “They kept the more silence”: mâllon is “more”, in a greater degree, and hēsychía is stillness, a ceasing from noise and talk. The shouting gave way to a deeper quiet, and Paul was able to begin. The words “and he saith” lead into his account in Acts 22:3–21.

A proverb speaks of the joy of a fitting answer and of how good a word spoken at the right time is (Proverbs 15:23). God gave his servant the wisdom to speak a word this crowd would hear, and it opened a door for his testimony. Paul shows the same care for his hearers later, when he speaks before King Agrippa (Acts 26:1–29).

Who Paul had been: a Jew trained in the law

“I am verily a man which am a Jew” answers the charge at once. He is a Jew by birth, neither a Gentile nor a proselyte. “Born” is gennáō, to beget or bring forth, used here of his birth in Tarsus. Tarsus, in Cilicia, was a major Greek-speaking city, a centre of learning and trade and a Roman provincial capital, with a large Jewish community. Paul was also a Roman citizen (Acts 16:37), but before this crowd he stresses that he is a Jew.

“Yet brought up in this city” means Jerusalem, the heart of Jewish life, where he was raised from his youth. “At the feet of Gamaliel” is a way of saying that he was formally taught as a disciple of that master. Gamaliḗl, a name of Hebrew origin, was the revered Pharisee and teacher of the law usually called Gamaliel I, a leading member of the council, known for wisdom and moderation. Acts shows him counselling the council to leave the apostles alone, in case they should be found fighting against God (Acts 5:34–39). To name him as one’s teacher was to claim the finest religious education of the day.

“Taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers” says the same thing in another way. “Taught” is paideúō, to train up a child or to educate. “Perfect manner” is akríbeia, exactness, so he was trained in the law with strict precision. “Of the fathers” is patrōios, belonging to one’s fathers, inherited, the law handed down from their ancestors. Verse 1 shares the English “fathers”, and there the Greek is patḗr. His training covered the written law of Moses and the body of tradition and interpretation handed down with it, which was central to the Pharisees.

“And was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day.” “Zealous” is zēlōtḗs, a zealot, one full of fervent devotion, from a root meaning to be hot or to boil. Paul sets his past beside their present: what they are today, he was. He credits them with real zeal for God, and the same words gently suggest that their zeal, like his own once was, may be sincere and still aimed the wrong way. Elsewhere Paul writes that his zeal showed itself in persecuting the church (Philippians 3:4–7) and that he advanced in Judaism beyond many of his own age (Galatians 1:13–16).

God was preparing him through all of this. The learning he gained under Gamaliel, which he first turned against the church, later equipped him to explain the Scriptures and defend the gospel. The Lord told Ananias that Saul was his chosen vessel to carry his name (Acts 9:15).

Persecutor of the Way

“And I persecuted this way unto the death.” “Persecuted” is diṓkō, a strengthened form of a verb meaning to flee, so it means to pursue, to put to flight. It can mean simply to follow after, and here it means to hunt down with hostile intent. Paul names himself as the one who did it.

What “this way” means

“Way” is hodós, a road, and by extension a manner or means of life. In Acts “the Way” is a name for the followers of Jesus, used when Saul sought letters against any he found “of this way” (Acts 9:2), when some in Ephesus spoke evil of “that way” (Acts 19:9), and when Paul confesses before Felix that he worships God “after the way which they call heresy” (Acts 24:14). The name speaks of a whole manner of life centred on following Jesus Christ, who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). Saul once thought this Way a dangerous sect that had to be stamped out.

Unto the death

“Death” is thánatos. “Unto the death” can be read in two ways. It may mean that his persecution led to believers being killed, or that he pursued them so far that death was the intended end. Either way it shows how severe his campaign was. He was present at the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:54–60), and Acts records how he went on to ravage the church (Acts 8:1–3).

“Binding and delivering into prisons” describes his methods. “Binding” is desmeúō, to put a prisoner in chains, “delivering” is paradídōmi, to hand over or deliver up, and “prisons” is phylakḗ, a guard or a place of guarding. These are arrests and formal imprisonment, and they show that he acted with authority. “Both men and women” shows that he spared no one. He was a Pharisee, and he counted this a faithful service to God and the law.

Witnesses and warrants from the high priest

“As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders.” “Bear witness” is martyréō, to be a witness, to testify. Paul calls on the highest authorities of his people as men who can confirm his story. “The estate of the elders” is presbytérion, the order of elders. The word can name a Christian presbytery, and here it is the Sanhedrin, the supreme council of chief priests, scribes and elders. His persecution was sanctioned by the very council his hearers honoured.

“From whom also I received letters unto the brethren.” The letters (epistolḗ, a written message) served as warrants, giving him legal standing to arrest believers in Jesus far from Judea. “Brethren” is the same word adelphós that Paul used of the crowd in verse 1. It means his fellow Jews, the Jews of Damascus, and the people he went to arrest were Jewish believers in Jesus.

“And went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem.” Damascus was a major city of Syria with a large Jewish population, and the faith had already taken root there. Acts tells this journey in full (Acts 9:1–19). “Bound” here is déō, to bind or tie, while the “binding” of verse 4 is desmeúō, so the two verses share only the English word. He meant to bring them back as prisoners for trial before the council.

“For to be punished.” The verb timōréō means properly to protect one’s honour, and so to avenge or inflict a penalty. The penalty in view could range from flogging, which Paul himself later received from the Jews (2 Corinthians 11:24), to imprisonment, and in the worst cases death, as Stephen’s stoning shows. And there is a deep irony here. The man who once bound believers and led them away for punishment now stands bound himself, on trial for the faith he tried to destroy.

Did the council have authority as far as Damascus?

The council’s authority reached the Jewish communities of the empire in religious matters. Rome kept political control but generally left the internal religious affairs of the Jews to them, and the synagogues of cities like Damascus kept close ties with Jerusalem. Letters from the council would have been respected and acted on by synagogue leaders there. That authority covered Jews and their own religious disputes, and it gave no power over Roman citizens or Gentiles.

Why Paul tells the story of his past

Paul recounts all this to show that his change came from God. He knew the law thoroughly and served it with his whole heart, and he was utterly convinced that he was serving God. He later told Agrippa that he thought he ought to do many things against the name of Jesus (Acts 26:9). To him the claim that Jesus was the Messiah was blasphemy, and he believed he was defending the law and the traditions of his fathers. That is why the next part of his speech, his meeting with the risen Christ on the Damascus road (Acts 22:6–16), is so striking. Acts tells this conversion three times: in Acts 9 when it happened, here before the crowd, and again before Agrippa (Acts 26:9–18), each told for its own hearers.

His story shows that sincere zeal can still set a man against God. Saul was fervent and devout, and he was persecuting the church of God. Salvation came to him as a gift of grace through faith, unearned by any religious effort (Ephesians 2:8–9). Paul later counted all his credentials as loss for the sake of Christ (Philippians 3:7–8), for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4). He called himself the chief of sinners and said that he obtained mercy so that Christ might show in him all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who would believe after him (1 Timothy 1:12–16).

Christ behind Paul’s defense

Paul pleads his case before his accusers. Jesus, when he stood before his, offered no defence at all, as Isaiah foretold: “he was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7). God vindicated him by raising him from the dead, declaring him to be the Son of God with power (Romans 1:4), and he now pleads for us as our advocate with the Father (1 John 2:1). The punishment Saul wanted to bring on believers fell on Christ himself, who was wounded for our transgressions (Isaiah 53:5). The high priest of verse 5 signed letters to bind and punish, while Jesus, our great high priest (Hebrews 4:14), sets his people free.

Paul’s choice to speak in the people’s own tongue is a small picture of what Christ did on a far greater scale. He “made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men” (Philippians 2:7), the Word made flesh who lived among us (John 1:14). The hush that fell on the crowd is a faint echo of the authority of Jesus, who stilled a storm with a word (Mark 4:39) and whose teaching astonished the crowds (Matthew 7:28–29). And the gospel Paul was about to proclaim crosses every barrier of language, as Pentecost showed when people from many nations heard the wonderful works of God in their own tongues (Acts 2:4–11).

The Way that Saul persecuted belonged to Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). Jesus had told his followers that they would be hated for his name’s sake (Matthew 10:22), and the persecutor became one of them, suffering beatings, prisons and dangers for Christ (2 Corinthians 11:23–27). His whole life became a witness that the gospel is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes (Romans 1:16).

Grace that reached the persecutor

These verses give us a man who stood among his enemies with courtesy and courage, and who told the truth about the worst things he had done. They show us a God who chose Saul while he was still dragging believers to prison, and who used even his training under Gamaliel for the gospel he once fought. No one in the crowd that day was further from Christ than Paul had been.

Paul’s way of speaking is a pattern for the answer Peter tells us always to be ready to give for the hope that is in us, with meekness and fear (1 Peter 3:15). It is speech seasoned with grace (Colossians 4:6), given in the defence and confirmation of the gospel (Philippians 1:7). And it is a reason to pray with hope for the fiercest opponents of the faith, because the Lord who turned Saul around is the same today.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Acts 22:1–2. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 2 verses
Passage under commentActs 22:1–2
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Paul had, in the last verse of the foregoing chapter, gained a great point, by commanding so profound a silence after so loud a clamour. Now here observe,

I.With what an admirable composure and presence of mind he addresses himself to speak.

Never was poor man set upon in a more tumultuous manner, nor with more rage and fury; and yet, in what he said,

1.There appears o fright, but his mind is sedate and composed. Thus he makes his own words good, None of these things move me; and David's (Psalm 3:6), I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people that have set themselves against me round about.

2.There appears no passion. Though the suggestions against him were all frivolous and unjust, though it would have vexed any man alive to be charged with profaning the temple just then when he was contriving and designing to show his respect to it, yet he breaks out into no angry expressions, but is led as a lamb to the slaughter.

II.What respectful titles he gives even to those who thus abused him, and how humbly he craves their attention:

"Men, brethren, and fathers, Acts 22:1. To you, O men, I call; men, that should hear reason, and be ruled by it; men, from whom one may expect humanity. You, brethren of the common people; you, fathers of the priests." Thus he lets them know that he was one of them, and had not renounced his relation to the Jewish nation, but still had a kindness and concern for it. Note, Though we must not give flattering titles to any, yet we ought to give titles of due respect to all; and those we would do good to we should endeavour not to provoke. Though he was rescued out of their hands, and was taken under the protection of the chief captain, yet he does not fall foul upon them, with, Hear now, you rebels; but compliments them with, Men, brethren, and fathers. And observe, he does not exhibit a charge against them, does not recriminate, Hear now what I have to say against you, but, Hear now what I have to say for myself: Hear you my defence; a just and reasonable request, for every man that is accused has a right to answer for himself, and has not justice done him if his answer be not patiently and impartially heard.

III.The language he spoke in, which recommended what he said to the auditory; He spoke in the Hebrew tongue, that is, the vulgar language of the Jews, which, at this time, was not the pure Old Testament Hebrew, but the Syriac, a dialect of the Hebrew, or rather a corruption of it, as the Italian of the Latin. However,

1.It showed his continued respect to his countrymen, the Jews. Though he had conversed so much with the Gentiles, yet he still retained the Jews' language, and could talk it with ease; by this it appears he is a Jew, for his speech betrayeth him.

2.What he said was the more generally understood, for that was the language every body spoke, and therefore to speak in that language was indeed to appeal to the people, by which he might have somewhat to insinuate into their affections; and therefore, when they heard that he spoke in the Hebrew tongue, they kept the more silence. How can it be thought people should give any attention to that which is spoken to them in a language they do not understand? The chief captain was surprised to hear him speak Greek (Acts 21:37), the Jews were surprised to hear him speak Hebrew, and both therefore think the better of him. But how would they have been surprised if they had enquired, as they ought to have done, and found in what variety of tongues the Spirit gave him utterance! 1 Corinthians 14:18, I speak with tongues more than you all. But the truth is, many wise and good men are therefore slighted only because they are not known.

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 407–585
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceHomily on Acts 47
"He spake unto them," it says, "in the Hebrew tongue, saying, Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you." Mark his address, at once so free from all flattery, and so expressive of meekness. For he says not, "Masters," nor "Lords," but, "Brethren," just the word they most liked: "I am no alien from you," he says, nor "against you." "Men," he says, "brethren, and fathers:" this, a term of honor, that of kindred. "Hear ye," says he, "my" - he says not, "teaching," nor "harangue," but, "my defence which I now make unto you." He puts himself in the posture of a suppliant.
"Men, brethren, hear ye the account which I now give unto you," etc. Paul, being inclined to simplicity of heart, told the people, in order, how he had been chosen by the Lord when he was a persecutor of the church; he did not even fail to mention, with a broken heart, his crime relating to Stephen's blood; but he said that he had heard from the Lord, whom he could not oppose, that he would be sent to preach to the Gentiles. The Jews, who had been listening thus far, began to shout loudly to the tribune that a man trying to convince them of such things should be removed from the living.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Acts 22:1 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8