Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the king said, What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah? so let him curse, because the LORD hath said unto him, Curse David. Who shall then say, Wherefore hast thou done so?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the king H4428 said H559, What have I to do with you, ye sons H1121 of Zeruiah H6870? so let him curse H7043, because the LORD H3068 hath said H559 unto him, Curse H7043 David H1732. Who shall then say H559, Wherefore hast thou done so H6213?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The king said, "Do you sons of Tz'ruyah and I have anything in common? Let him curse. If ADONAI tells him, 'Curse David,' who has the right to ask, 'Why are you doing it?'"
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
But the king replied, “What have I to do with you, O sons of Zeruiah? If he curses me because the LORD told him, ‘Curse David,’ who can ask, ‘Why did you do this?’”
Ask
American Standard Version
And the king said, What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah? Because he curseth, and because Jehovah hath said unto him, Curse David; who then shall say, Wherefore hast thou done so?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The king said, “What have I to do with you, you sons of Zeruiah? Because he curses, and because the LORD has said to him, ‘Curse David;’ who then shall say, ‘Why have you done so?’”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
But the King saide, What haue I to doe with you, ye sonnes of Zeruiah? for he curseth, eue because the Lord hath bidden him curse Dauid: who dare then say, Wherfore hast thou done so?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And the king saith, `What--to me and to you, O sons of Zeruiah? for--let him revile; even because Jehovah hath said to him, Revile David; and who saith, Wherefore hast Thou done so?'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of David View full PDF
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem
Absalom Seizes Jerusalem View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 8,437 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

In 2 Samuel 16:10, King David, facing the humiliation of Absalom's rebellion and fleeing Jerusalem, demonstrates extraordinary spiritual discernment and submission to divine sovereignty when confronted by Shimei, a Benjamite from Saul's house, who curses him vehemently. Despite the zealous offer from his nephew Abishai to execute Shimei for his insolence, David restrains his commander, perceiving Shimei's actions not merely as a personal affront but as a divinely permitted affliction, perhaps even a consequence of his own past sins. This verse powerfully illustrates David's profound humility, his unwavering trust in God's ultimate control over all circumstances, and his commitment to leaving vengeance in the Lord's hands, even in the throes of deep personal crisis and public humiliation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This pivotal verse is situated at a critical and emotionally charged moment in David's reign, immediately following his forced exodus from Jerusalem due to the audacious coup led by his own son, Absalom. 2 Samuel 15 meticulously chronicles David's sorrowful departure, the loyalty of some of his followers, and the cunning betrayal orchestrated by Absalom. As David and his entourage make their way through Bahurim, they encounter Shimei, a man from the clan of Saul, who openly reviles the king, cursing him and throwing stones and dust. David's formidable military commander, Abishai, one of the "sons of Zeruiah," immediately proposes to execute Shimei for such an egregious act of disrespect against the anointed king. David's response in 2 Samuel 16:10 is a direct and profound theological counterpoint to Abishai's pragmatic, violent suggestion, revealing David's unique spiritual perspective on his suffering and his resolute refusal to retaliate, choosing instead to interpret the event through the lens of divine sovereignty.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, the act of cursing was far more than a mere insult; it was a serious offense, often believed to invoke divine judgment and bring misfortune upon the cursed. Shimei's actions—cursing, throwing stones, and casting dust—were public, symbolic expressions of profound contempt and a politically charged rejection of David's kingship, particularly potent given Shimei's allegiance to the deposed house of Saul. This was not simply personal animosity but a declaration that David was a usurper or divinely cursed. The "sons of Zeruiah" (Joab and Abishai) were renowned for their fierce loyalty to David and their decisive, often ruthless, military prowess (e.g., Joab's killing of Abner in 2 Samuel 3:30). David's restraint of them in this moment of extreme vulnerability is highly significant, demonstrating a king who, even in apparent weakness, maintains control over his powerful commanders and, more importantly, submits to a higher, divine authority. The theological principle that God can use human agents, even malicious ones, to achieve His purposes or administer discipline was well-understood in Israel (e.g., Isaiah 10:5-7).
  • Key Themes: 2 Samuel 16:10 encapsulates several profound theological themes. Foremost is Divine Sovereignty, as David attributes Shimei's cursing directly to the Lord's permission or command, recognizing God's hand even in apparent injustice. This connects to the broader theme of God's Control over All Circumstances, including adverse ones. Another crucial theme is Humility and Acceptance of Discipline, as David's willingness to endure Shimei's curses suggests an acknowledgment of his own past sins (particularly the Bathsheba and Uriah affair, and Nathan's prophecy in 2 Samuel 12:11). This demonstrates a spirit of Repentance and a readiness to bear the consequences of his actions. Finally, the verse powerfully highlights the theme of Restraining Vengeance and Trusting God for Justice, as David prevents immediate retribution, choosing to leave the ultimate judgment to God, a principle echoed throughout Scripture (e.g., Deuteronomy 32:35).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • King (Hebrew, melek', H4428): The term "king" here (H4428) refers to David, the anointed monarch of Israel. Despite his current state of vulnerability and flight from his rebellious son, David retains his regal authority and spiritual insight. His response in this verse is not that of a desperate fugitive, but of a sovereign ruler who understands his position before God and maintains control over his zealous subordinates. This highlights the paradox of David's situation: physically weak and fleeing, yet spiritually strong and authoritative.
  • Sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): The word "sons" (H1121) in "sons of Zeruiah" refers to David's nephews, Joab and Abishai, who were his most powerful and often volatile military commanders. The term "sons" can denote not just literal offspring but also those belonging to a group, clan, or exhibiting certain characteristics. Here, it signifies their close familial and military relationship to David, but also their shared aggressive and impulsive nature. David's exasperated question "What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah?" underscores his frequent need to rein in their violent tendencies, indicating a recurring tension between his spiritual discernment and their more pragmatic, often ruthless, approach to conflict.
  • Said (Hebrew, ʼâmar', H559): The verb "said" (H559) appears multiple times in this verse, first describing David's utterance, then referring to the Lord's "saying" to Shimei, and finally to the rhetorical question "Who shall then say...". This repetition emphasizes the power of spoken words, both human and divine. When applied to the Lord, "said" implies divine decree, permission, or orchestration, highlighting God's ultimate sovereignty over events. For David, it signifies a profound theological interpretation: Shimei's curse is not just human malice, but an act permitted or prompted by God, making resistance to it an act of resistance against God's will.
  • Curse (Hebrew, qâlal', H7043): The verb "curse" (H7043) signifies a verbal pronouncement intended to bring harm, misfortune, or divine judgment upon someone. Shimei's cursing of David was a deliberate act to invoke divine disfavor against him, implying David was already under God's judgment. David's acceptance of this curse, rather than resisting it, is remarkable. He understands that if God has "said" for Shimei to curse, then the curse itself is an instrument, not merely an act of human malice, and therefore, to resist it would be to resist God's will. This acceptance transforms the nature of the curse from a personal affront to a divinely orchestrated event.
  • Done (Hebrew, ʻâsâh', H6213): The verb "done" (H6213) in the rhetorical question "Wherefore hast thou done so?" refers to the action of the Lord. David's question implies that if the Lord is the ultimate agent behind Shimei's cursing, then no human has the right to question or challenge God's actions. This word underscores David's conviction in God's absolute sovereignty and His right to act as He sees fit, even through seemingly unjust or painful means. It reinforces the idea that God's purposes are beyond human scrutiny and interference.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the king said, What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah?": David's opening words convey exasperation and a firm rejection of Abishai's proposal to kill Shimei. The idiom "What have I to do with you?" is a strong expression of disassociation, indicating that Abishai's aggressive impulse is fundamentally misaligned with David's understanding of the situation and his desired response. It underscores David's authority, even in his vulnerable state, asserting his will over his zealous commanders and prioritizing a spiritual perspective over immediate, violent retribution.
  • "so let him curse, because the LORD hath said unto him, Curse David.": This clause is the theological core of David's response. He commands his men to allow Shimei to continue his cursing, because he believes Shimei is acting under divine permission or even prompting. David perceives God's hand in his suffering, interpreting Shimei's curses as a potential instrument of God's discipline, possibly for David's past sins. This demonstrates an extraordinary level of humility and submission to God's sovereign will, even when that will manifests through painful and humiliating circumstances orchestrated by a malicious human agent.
  • "Who shall then say, Wherefore hast thou done so?": This rhetorical question powerfully concludes David's argument. It is not seeking an answer but emphatically states David's conviction that if God is behind an event, no human has the right to question or challenge it. It implies that God's actions and purposes are ultimately inscrutable and beyond human scrutiny, and that to interfere with Shimei's cursing would be to question God's wisdom, authority, or justice. This statement reinforces David's profound trust in God's ultimate righteousness and His prerogative to act as He sees fit, even through seemingly unjust means.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices that amplify its theological depth. The most prominent is Rhetorical Question ("Who shall then say, Wherefore hast thou done so?"), which serves not to elicit an answer but to emphasize David's conviction that God's actions are unquestionable and beyond human challenge. This device powerfully conveys David's theological perspective and his profound submission to divine authority. The phrase "What have I to do with you?" is a potent Idiom expressing exasperation and a command to desist, highlighting the tension between David's spiritual discernment and his commanders' more pragmatic, aggressive instincts. There is also a profound element of Irony in David's statement: Shimei intends to curse David to bring him harm and misfortune, but David interprets this curse as potentially coming from the Lord, thus transforming an act of human malice into a potential act of divine discipline, which, paradoxically, could lead to purification, repentance, and eventual restoration. This divine permission for the curse also subtly Foreshadows the eventual vindication of David, as God's discipline often precedes His ultimate faithfulness and restoration.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Samuel 16:10 offers a profound theological statement on divine sovereignty, the nature of human suffering, and the proper response to injustice. David's perspective transforms a deeply personal attack into a divinely orchestrated event, demonstrating a deep trust that God is actively at work even in the midst of chaos, humiliation, and apparent defeat. This aligns with the broader biblical understanding that God can use all things, even the malice of men, to accomplish His overarching purposes, whether for discipline, testing, or the ultimate good of His people. David's immediate restraint of vengeance and his willingness to endure suffering point to a higher spiritual principle: that God is the ultimate arbiter of justice, and believers are called to trust His timing and methods rather than seeking immediate retribution. This posture of humility and submission is a hallmark of mature faith, recognizing that God's ways are higher than human ways, and His judgments are always righteous and ultimately for His glory.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

David's extraordinary response to Shimei in 2 Samuel 16:10 provides a powerful and counter-cultural model for believers facing adversity, criticism, or unjust treatment. It challenges us to look beyond the immediate human agent of our suffering and prayerfully consider the possibility of God's sovereign hand at work, even in the most painful circumstances. Instead of reacting with anger, defensiveness, or a desire for immediate retribution, David chose humility, self-control, and submission, trusting that God was either disciplining him for past sins or testing his faith for a greater, redemptive purpose. This calls us to cultivate a similar spiritual perspective: to pause before reacting impulsively, to examine our own hearts for any unconfessed sin that might be contributing to our trials, and to surrender our desire for personal vengeance or vindication. True spiritual maturity often manifests not in our ability to fight back or prove our innocence, but in our capacity to endure suffering with grace, trusting God to vindicate us in His perfect timing. It reminds us that our ultimate battle is not against flesh and blood, but against spiritual forces, and our ultimate trust must be in the Lord, who works all things according to the counsel of His will for the good of those who love Him.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do I typically react when I feel unjustly attacked, criticized, or humiliated? Is my first instinct to defend myself, retaliate, or seek God's perspective on the situation?
  • In what ways might God be using difficult people, challenging circumstances, or even malicious acts in my life to humble me, refine my character, or draw me into deeper dependence upon Him?
  • Do I truly believe that God is sovereign over all circumstances, even those that seem chaotic, unfair, or maliciously intended? How does this belief impact my emotional and spiritual response to adversity?
  • What specific steps can I take to surrender my desire for immediate vengeance or self-vindication and instead trust God to administer justice and work His purposes in His own way and time?

FAQ

Why didn't David punish Shimei immediately, especially when he had the power and loyal commanders to do so?

Answer: David's decision not to punish Shimei immediately, despite having loyal and capable commanders like Abishai ready to execute the offender, stemmed from a profound spiritual insight and a deep understanding of divine sovereignty. He perceived Shimei's cursing not merely as a personal insult or political defiance, but as an act permitted, and perhaps even prompted, by the Lord Himself. David's statement, "because the LORD hath said unto him, Curse David," indicates his belief that God was using Shimei as an instrument of discipline or testing. In his humility, David may have seen this public humiliation as a just consequence for his own past sins (e.g., the Bathsheba and Uriah affair, detailed in 2 Samuel 11). By refraining from immediate vengeance, David demonstrated his submission to God's sovereign will and his trust that God would ultimately administer justice or mercy as He saw fit. This also prevented David from acting impulsively in a moment of great personal vulnerability and ensured that any future action against Shimei would be God's timing, not man's.

What does "the LORD hath said unto him, Curse David" truly mean? Did God literally command Shimei to curse David?

Answer: This phrase does not imply a direct, audible, or explicit command from God to Shimei. Rather, it reflects David's deep theological understanding of God's divine sovereignty and His active involvement in all of life's circumstances. It means that God, in His overarching plan and permissive will, allowed or even orchestrated Shimei's actions to occur. The Bible often describes God "saying" or "doing" things when He permits or uses human agents, even those with malicious intent, to accomplish His purposes, whether for judgment, discipline, or the testing and refining of His people. For David, this was a moment of profound humility and acceptance of God's will, even if it came through a hostile human instrument. It signifies that nothing happens outside of God's ultimate control, and David recognized God's hand in his suffering, choosing to submit rather than resist, trusting in God's perfect wisdom and timing.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

David's profound response to Shimei's curses in 2 Samuel 16:10 finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. David, though a man after God's own heart, was still a sinner whose suffering could be seen, in part, as a consequence of his own actions. Yet, in his humility, he accepted the curse as from the Lord. Jesus, however, was the sinless Son of God, the perfect Lamb, who endured the ultimate curse not for His own sin, but for ours. Just as David restrained his zealous followers from defending him, Jesus willingly submitted to the unjust accusations, mockery, and violence of His enemies, even rebuking Peter for drawing his sword in Matthew 26:52. He did not retaliate when reviled, but "entrusted himself to him who judges justly" (1 Peter 2:23), demonstrating perfect obedience and trust in the Father's sovereign plan. The cursing of Shimei foreshadows the far greater humiliation and suffering endured by Christ on the cross, where He became a curse for us, as Galatians 3:13 declares, to redeem us from the curse of the law. David's acceptance of God's will in suffering points forward to Christ's perfect obedience, even to the point of death on a cross (Philippians 2:8), demonstrating the ultimate trust in the Father's sovereign plan of salvation and establishing the pattern for all who would follow Him.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Samuel 16 verses 5–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We here find how David bore Shimei's curses much better than he had borne Ziba's flatteries. By the latter he was brought to pass a wrong judgment on another, by the former to pass a right judgment on himself. The world's smiles are more dangerous than its frowns. Observe here,

I. How insolent and furious Shimei was, and how his malice took occasion from David's present distress to be so much the more outrageous. David, in his flight, had come to Bahurim, a city of Benjamin in or near which this Shimei lived, who, being of the house of Saul (with the fall of which all his hopes of preferment fell), had an implacable enmity to David, unjustly looking upon him as the ruin of Saul and his family only because, by the divine appointment, he succeeded Saul. While David was in prosperity and power, Shimei hated him as much as he did now, but he durst not then say anything against him. God knows what is in the hearts of those that are disaffected to him and his government, but earthly princes do not. Now he came forth, and cursed David with all the bad words and wishes he could invent, Sa2 16:5. Observe,

1.Why he took this opportunity to give vent to his malice. (1.) Because now he thought he might do it safely; yet, if David had thought proper to resent the provocation, it would have cost Shimei his life. (2.) Because now it would be most grievous to David, would add affliction to his grief, and pour vinegar into his wounds. He complains of those as most barbarous who talk to the grief of those whom God has wounded, Psa 69:26. So Shimei did, loading him with curses whom no generous eye could look upon without compassion. (3.) Because now he thought that Providence justified his reproaches, and that David's present afflictions proved him to be as bad a man as he was willing to represent him. Job's friends condemned him upon this false principle. Those that are under the rebukes of a gracious God must not think it strange if these bring upon them the reproaches of evil men. If once it be said, God hath forsaken him, presently it follows, Persecute and take him, Psa 71:11. But it is the character of a base spirit thus to trample upon those that are down, and insult over them.

2.How his malice was expressed. See, (1.) What this wretched man did: He cast stones at David (Sa2 16:6), as if his king had been a dog, or the worst of criminals, whom all Israel must stone with stones till he die. Perhaps he kept at such a distance that the stones he threw could not reach David, nor any of his attendants, yet he showed what he would have done if it had been in his power. He cast dust (Sa2 16:13), which, probably, would blow into his own eyes, like the curses he threw, which, being causeless, would return upon his own head. Thus, while his malice made him odious, the impotency of it made him ridiculous and contemptible. Those that fight against God cannot hurt him, though they hate him. If thou sinnest, what doest thou against him? Job 35:6. It was an aggravation of his wickedness that David was attended with his mighty men on his right hand and on his left, so that he was not in so forlorn a condition as he thought (persecuted but not forsaken), and that he continued to do it, and did it the more passionately, for David's bearing it patiently. (2.) What he said. With the stones he shot his arrows, even bitter words (Sa2 16:7, Sa2 16:8), in contempt of that law, Thou shalt not curse the gods, Exo 22:28. David was a man of honour and conscience, and in great reputation for every thing that was just and good; what could this foul mouth say against him? Why, truly, what was done long since to the house of Saul was the only thing which he could recollect, and with this he upbraided David because it was the thing that he himself was a loser by. See how apt we are to judge of men and their character by what they are to us, and to conclude that those are certainly evil men that have ever so justly been, or that we ever so unjustly think have been, instruments of evil to us. So partial are we to ourselves that no rule can be more fallacious than this. No man could be more innocent of the blood of the house of Saul than David was. Once and again he spared Saul's life, while Saul sought his. When Saul and his sons were slain by the Philistines, David and his men were many miles off; and, when they heard it, they lamented it. From the murder of Abner and Ish-bosheth he had sufficiently cleared himself; and yet all the blood of the house of Saul must be laid at his door. Innocency is no fence against malice and falsehood; nor are we to think it strange if we be charged with that from which we have been most careful to keep ourselves. It is well for us that men are not to be our judges, but he whose judgment is according to truth. The blood of the house of Saul is here most unjustly charged upon David, [1.] As that which gave him his character, and denominated him a bloody man and a man of Belial, Sa2 16:7. And, if a man of blood, no doubt a man of Belial, that is, a child of the devil, who is called Belial (Co2 6:15), and who was a murderer from the beginning. Bloody men are the worst of men. [2.] As that which brought the present trouble upon him: "Now that thou art dethroned, and driven out to the wilderness, the Lord has returned upon thee the blood of the house of Saul." See how forward malicious men are to press God's judgments into the service of their own passion and revenge. If any who have, as they think, wronged them, should come into trouble, the injury done to them must be made the cause of the trouble. But we must take heed lest we wrong God by making his providence thus to patronise our foolish and unjust resentments. As the wrath of man works not the righteousness of God, so the righteousness of God serves not the wrath of man. [3.] As that which would now be his utter ruin; for he endeavours to make him despair of ever recovering his throne again. Now they said, There is no help for him in God (Psa 3:2), the Lord hath delivered the kingdom into the hand of Absalom (not Mephibosheth - the house of Saul never dreamed of making him king, as Ziba suggested), and thou art taken in thy mischief, that is, "the mischief that will be thy destruction, and all because thou art a bloody man." Thus Shimei cursed.

II. See how patient and submissive David was under this abuse. The sons of Zeruiah, Abishai particularly, were forward to maintain David's honour with their swords; they resented the affront keenly, as well they might: Why should this dead dog be suffered to curse the king? Sa2 16:9. If David will but give them leave, they will put these lying cursing lips to silence, and take off his head; for his throwing stones at the king was an overt act, which abundantly proved that he compassed and imagined his death. But the king would by no means suffer it: What have I to do with you? So let him curse. Thus Christ rebuked the disciples, who, in zeal for his honour, would have commanded fire from heaven on the town that affronted him, Luk 9:55. Let us see with what considerations David quieted himself. 1. The chief thing that silenced him was that he had deserved this affliction. This is not mentioned indeed; for a man may truly repent, and yet needs not, upon all occasions, proclaim his penitent reflections. Shimei unjustly upbraided him with the blood of Saul: from that his conscience acquitted him, but, at the same time, it charged him with the blood of Uriah. "The reproach is too true" (thinks David), "though false as he means it." Note, A humble tender spirit will turn reproaches into reproofs, and so get good by them, instead of being provoked by them. 2. He observes the hand of God in it: The Lord hath said unto him, Curse David (Sa2 16:10), and again, So let him curse, for the Lord hath bidden him, Sa2 16:11. As it was Shimei's sin, it was not from God, but from the devil and his own wicked heart, nor did God's hand in it excuse or extenuate it, much less justify it, any more than it did the sin of those who put Christ to death, Act 2:23, Act 4:28. But, as it was David's affliction, it was from the Lord, one of the evils which he raised up against him. David looked above the instrument of his trouble to the supreme director, as Job, when the plunderers had stripped him, acknowledged, The Lord hath taken away. Nothing more proper to quiet a gracious soul under affliction than an eye to the hand of God in it. I opened not my mouth, because thou didst it. The scourge of the tongue is God's rod. 3. He quiets himself under the less affliction with the consideration of the greater (Sa2 16:11): My son seeks my life, much more may this Benjamite. Note, Tribulation works patience in those that are sanctified. The more we bear the better able we should be to bear still more; what tries our patience should improve it. The more we are inured to trouble the less we should be surprised at it, and not think it strange. Marvel not that enemies are injurious, when even friends are unkind; nor that friends are unkind, when even children are undutiful. 4. He comforts himself with hopes that God would, in some way or other, bring good to him out of his affliction, would balance the trouble itself, and recompense his patience under it: "The Lord will requite me good for his cursing. If God bid Shimei grieve me, it is that he himself may the more sensibly comfort me; surely he has mercy in store for me, which he is preparing me for by this trial." We may depend upon God as our pay-master, not only for our services, but for our sufferings. Let them curse, but bless thou. David, at length, is housed at Bahurim (Sa2 16:14), where he meets with refreshment, and is hidden from this strife of tongues.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On the Duties of the Clergy 1.48.236-38
We can show, too, that holy David was like Paul in this same class of virtue. When … Shimei cursed him and charged him with heavy offenses, at the first he was silent and humbled himself, and was silent even about his good deeds, that is, his knowledge of good works. Then he even asked to be cursed; for when he was cursed he hoped to gain divine pity.But see how he stored up humility and justice and prudence so as to merit grace from the Lord! At first he said, “Therefore he cursed me, because the Lord has said to him that he should curse.” Here we have humility; for he thought that those things which are divinely ordered were to be endured with an even mind, as though he were but some servant lad. Then he said, “Behold, my son, who came forth of my body, seeks my life.” Here we have justice. For if we suffer hard things at the hand of our own family, why are we angry at what is done to us by strangers? Lastly he says, “Let him alone that he may curse, for the Lord has bidden him. It may be that the Lord will look on my humiliation and requite me good for this cursing.” So he bore not only the abuse but left the man unpunished when throwing stones and following him. No, even more. After his victory he freely granted him pardon when he asked for it.
I have written to show that holy David, in true evangelical spirit, was not only not offended but was even thankful to his abuser and was delighted rather than angered by his wrongs, for which he thought some return would be granted to him. But, though perfect, he sought something still more perfect. As a man he grew hot at the pain of his wrongs, but like a good soldier he conquered, he endured like a brave wrestler.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On the Duties of the Clergy 1.6.21-22
What need is there to be troubled when we hear abuse? Why do we not imitate him who says, “I was dumb and humbled myself, and kept silence even from good words.” Or did David only say this, and not act up to it? No, he also acted up to it. For when Shimei the son of Gera reviled him, David was silent; and although he was surrounded with armed men he did not return the abuse, nor seek revenge: no, even when the son of Zeruiah spoke to him, because he wished to take vengeance on him, David did not permit it. He went on as though dumb and humbled; he went on in silence; nor was he disturbed, although called a bloody man, though he was conscious of his own gentleness. He therefore was not disturbed by insults, for he had full knowledge of his own good works.He, then, who is quickly roused by wrong makes himself seem deserving of insult, even while he wishes to be shown not to deserve it. He who despises wrongs is better off than he who grieves over them. For he who despises them looks down on them, as though he doesn’t feel them; but he who grieves over them is tormented, just as though he actually felt them.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON 2 CORINTHIANS 23.7
For if we suffer evil by human hands, we cut off no small part of our debt by nobly bearing what is done to us. Therefore we receive no injury; for God reckons the ill treatment towards our debt, not according to the principle of justice but of his lovingkindness; and for this cause he didn’t relieve the one who suffered evil.… And when he bore with Shimei cursing him, David said, “Let him alone, that the Lord may see my abasement and requite me [with] good for this day.” For when he doesn’t aid us when we suffer wrong, then we are advantaged most of all; for he sets it to the account of our sins, if we bear it thankfully.
JeromeAD 420
Against the Pelagians 2.20
Have recourse, O Lord, always to your mercy, and sustain the weakness of my flesh by your divine assistance. “What have I to do,” he says, “with you also, you sons of Zeruiah? Let Shimei curse. The Lord has bidden him to curse David. And who shall say to him, ‘Why have you done so?’ ” For the will of God is not to be discussed but kindly accepted.… Therefore, the commandments of God are possible, which we know David had kept; and, yet, we find holy people growing weary in maintaining justice forever.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
ON GRACE AND FREE WILL 20.41
And was it not likewise of his own will that the wicked son of Gera cursed King David? And yet what does David say, full of true and deep and pious wisdom? What did he say to him who wanted to strike the reviler? "What," he said, "have I to do with you, you sons of Zeruiah? Let him alone and let him curse, because the Lord has said to him, 'Curse David.' Who, then, shall say, 'Why have you done so?' " And then the inspired Scripture, as if it would confirm the king's profound utterance by repeating it once more, tells us, "And David said to Abishai, and to all his servants, 'Behold, my son, who came forth from my body, seeks my life: how much more may this Benjamite do it! Let him alone, and let him curse; for the Lord has bidden him. It may be that the Lord will look on my humiliation and will requite me for his cursing this day.' " Now what prudent reader will fail to understand in what way the Lord bade this profane man to curse David? It was not by a command that he bade him, in which case his obedience would be praiseworthy; but he inclined the man's will, which had become debased by his own perverseness, to commit this sin, by his own just and secret judgment. Therefore it is said, "The Lord said to him." Now if this person had obeyed a command of God, he would have deserved to be praised rather than punished, as we know he was afterwards punished for this sin. Nor is the reason an obscure one why the Lord told him after this manner to curse David. "It may be," said the humbled king, "that the Lord will look on my humiliation and will requite me good for his cursing this day." See, then, what proof we have here that God uses the hearts of even wicked people for the praise and assistance of the good.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
On Patience 9.8
By this patience we are supported even when we are in sound health, for, amid the stumbling blocks of this world, our true happiness is deferred.… With this patience holy David endured the insults of one abusing him, and, though he could easily have wreaked vengeance on him, he not only did not do this but even calmed another who was grieved and disturbed on his account and used his royal power to forbid rather than to exercise vengeance. He was not then suffering from any bodily disease or wound. But he did recognize the time of humility and accepted the will of God for whose sake he drank in the bitter reproach with the utmost patience.
Richard ChallonerAD 1781
Hath bid him curse: Not that the Lord was the author of Semei's sin, which proceeded purely from his own malice, and the abuse of his free will. But that knowing, and suffering his malicious disposition to break out on this occasion, he made use of him as his instrument to punish David for his sins.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Samuel 16:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.